Safety Zone; Bullhead City Regatta, Bullhead City, AZ, 38568-38570 [2011-16539]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
38568
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
any license or permit granted prior to the
effective date of this order.
Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction by a United
States person or within the United States that
evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading
or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts
to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in
this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any
of the prohibitions set forth in this order is
prohibited.
Sec. 8. Nothing in this order shall prohibit
transactions for the conduct of the official
business of the Federal Government by
employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
Sec. 9. For the purposes of this order:
(a) The term ‘‘person’’ means an individual
or entity;
(b) The term ‘‘entity’’ means a partnership,
association, trust, joint venture, corporation,
group, subgroup, or other organization; and
(c) The term ‘‘United States person’’ means
any United States citizen or national,
permanent resident alien, entity organized
under the laws of the United States or any
jurisdiction within the United States
(including foreign branches), or any person
in the United States.
Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, is
hereby authorized to take such actions,
including the promulgation of rules and
regulations, and to employ all powers
granted to the President by IEEPA as may be
necessary to carry out the purposes of this
order. The Secretary of the Treasury may
redelegate any of these functions to other
officers and agencies of the United States
Government consistent with applicable law.
All agencies of the United States Government
are hereby directed to take all appropriate
measures within their authority to carry out
the provisions of this order.
Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, is
hereby authorized to determine that
circumstances no longer warrant the blocking
of the property and interests in property of
a person listed in the Annex to this order,
and to take necessary action to give effect to
that determination.
Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, is
hereby authorized to submit the recurring
and final reports to the Congress on the
national emergency declared in this order,
consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50
U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA
(50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).
Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and
does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law
or in equity by any party against the United
States, its departments, agencies, or entities,
its officers, employees, or agents, or any other
person.
Sec. 14. This order is effective at 8 p.m.
eastern standard time on February 25, 2011.
Barack Obama
THE WHITE HOUSE,
February 25, 2011.
ANNEX
Individuals
1. Ayesha QADHAFI [Lieutenant General
in the Libyan Army, born circa 1976 or 1977]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
2. Khamis QADHAFI [born 1980]
3. Muammar QADHAFI [Head of State of
Libya, born 1942]
4. Mutassim QADHAFI [National Security
Advisor and Lieutenant Colonel in the
Libyan Army, born circa 1975]
5. Saif Al-Islam QADHAFI [born June 5,
1972]
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Adam J. Szubin,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Approved: June 28, 2011.
David S. Cohen,
Acting Under Secretary, Office of Terrorism
and Financial Intelligence, Department of the
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2011–16621 Filed 6–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0410]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Bullhead City Regatta,
Bullhead City, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the Colorado
River in Bullhead City, Arizona for the
Bullhead City Regatta on August 13,
2011. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels would be prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective August 13,
2011, from 6 a.m. through 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0410 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0410 the ‘‘Keyword’’ box,
and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Petty Officer Shane Jackson,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard;
telephone 619–278–7267, e-mail
Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
publishing a NPRM would be
impracticable since immediate action is
needed to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, and other vessels and users of
the waterway during the Regatta event.
Basis and Purpose
The City of Bullhead is sponsoring the
Bullhead City Regatta, which is held on
the navigable waters of the Colorado
River in Bullhead City, Arizona. The
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, and other vessels and users of
the waterway. This event involves
people floating down the river on
inflatable rafts, inner tubes and floating
platforms. The size of vessels used
would vary in length from 3 feet to 100
feet. Approximately 15,000 to 20,000
people would be participating in this
event. The sponsor would provide 37
patrol and rescue boats to help facilitate
the event and ensure public safety.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone that would be
enforced from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on
August 13, 2011. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
crews, spectators, participants, and
other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
of the Port, or his designated
representative. The temporary safety
zone would include the waters of the
Colorado River between Davis Camp to
Rotary Park in Bullhead City, Arizona.
Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will publish a Local Notice to
Mariners (LNM).
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This determination is based on the
size and location of the safety zone.
Vessels will not be allowed to transit
through the established safety zone
during the specified times unless
authorized to do so by the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the waters of the Colorado
River between Davis Camp to Rotary
Park in Bullhead City, Arizona from
7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on August 13, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Although the
safety zone would apply to the entire
width of the river, traffic would be
allowed to pass through the zone with
the permission of the Coast Guard patrol
commander. Before the effective period,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
38569
the Coast Guard will publish a Local
Notice to Mariners (LNM).
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Petty Officer
Shane Jackson, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego,
Coast Guard at (619) 278–7267. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
38570
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 127 / Friday, July 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
involves establishing a safety zone and
is categorically excluded under figure
2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and
local, state, and Federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners can request permission to
transit through the safety zone from the
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander can be contacted on VHF–
FM channels 16 and 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other Federal, state, or local agencies.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Dated: June 7, 2011.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
33 CFR Part 165
[FR Doc. 2011–16539 Filed 6–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Add § 165.T11–425 to read as
follows:
■
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0588]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks
Event, Pagan River, Smithfield, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T11–425 Safety zone; Bullhead City
Regatta, Bullhead City, AZ.
ACTION:
(a) Location. This temporary safety
zone includes the waters of the
Colorado River between Davis Camp to
Rotary Park in Bullhead City, Arizona.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
is in effect from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on
August 13, 2011. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a
Local Notice to Mariners (LNM). If the
event concludes prior to the scheduled
termination time, the Captain of the Port
will cease enforcement of this safety
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a 420-foot radius safety
zone on the navigable waters of the
Pagan River in Smithfield, VA in
support of the Fourth of July Fireworks
event. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic movement to protect
mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with aerial fireworks
displays.
DATES: This rule will be effective from
9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 3, 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Jun 30, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0588 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0588 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail LCDR Christopher A.
O’Neal, Waterways Management
Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads,
Coast Guard; telephone 757–668–5580,
e-mail Carlos.A.Hernandez@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
Coast Guard did not receive the
application for this event in sufficient
time to allow for publication of an
NPRM, and any delay encountered in
this regulation’s effective date by
publishing a NPRM would require
either the cancellation of the event, or
require that the event be held without
a safety zone. Either course of action
would be contrary to the public interest
since immediate action is needed to
provide for the safety of life and
property on navigable waters.
Additionally, this temporary safety zone
will be enforced for approximately one
hour on Sunday, July 3, 2011 while the
fireworks display is in progress. This
safety zone should have a minimal
impact on transiting vessels because
mariners are not precluded from using
any portion of the waterway except the
area within the safety zone. In addition,
publishing an NPRM is unnecessary
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 127 (Friday, July 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38568-38570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16539]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0410]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Bullhead City Regatta, Bullhead City, AZ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Colorado River in Bullhead City, Arizona for
the Bullhead City Regatta on August 13, 2011. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the
waterway. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective August 13, 2011, from 6 a.m. through 6
p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0410 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0410 the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Petty Officer Shane Jackson, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard; telephone 619-278-7267, e-
mail Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because publishing a NPRM would be
impracticable since immediate action is needed to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and
other vessels and users of the waterway during the Regatta event.
Basis and Purpose
The City of Bullhead is sponsoring the Bullhead City Regatta, which
is held on the navigable waters of the Colorado River in Bullhead City,
Arizona. The temporary safety zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and
other vessels and users of the waterway. This event involves people
floating down the river on inflatable rafts, inner tubes and floating
platforms. The size of vessels used would vary in length from 3 feet to
100 feet. Approximately 15,000 to 20,000 people would be participating
in this event. The sponsor would provide 37 patrol and rescue boats to
help facilitate the event and ensure public safety.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone that would
be enforced from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on August 13, 2011. This safety zone
is necessary to provide for the safety of the crews, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels would be prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain
[[Page 38569]]
of the Port, or his designated representative. The temporary safety
zone would include the waters of the Colorado River between Davis Camp
to Rotary Park in Bullhead City, Arizona. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
This determination is based on the size and location of the safety
zone. Vessels will not be allowed to transit through the established
safety zone during the specified times unless authorized to do so by
the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the waters of the
Colorado River between Davis Camp to Rotary Park in Bullhead City,
Arizona from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. on August 13, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons.
Although the safety zone would apply to the entire width of the river,
traffic would be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission
of the Coast Guard patrol commander. Before the effective period, the
Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Petty Officer Shane Jackson,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard at
(619) 278-7267. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
[[Page 38570]]
procedures; and related management systems practices) that are
developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves establishing a
safety zone and is categorically excluded under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-425 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-425 Safety zone; Bullhead City Regatta, Bullhead City,
AZ.
(a) Location. This temporary safety zone includes the waters of the
Colorado River between Davis Camp to Rotary Park in Bullhead City,
Arizona.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section is in effect from 7 a.m. to 3
p.m. on August 13, 2011. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard
will publish a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM). If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will
cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and Federal law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated representative.
(2) Mariners can request permission to transit through the safety
zone from the Patrol Commander. The Patrol Commander can be contacted
on VHF-FM channels 16 and 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, state, or
local agencies.
Dated: June 7, 2011.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2011-16539 Filed 6-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P