Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Coastal Commercial Fireworks Displays at Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, CA, 37788-37793 [2011-16204]
Download as PDF
37788
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: June 21, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Dated: June 23, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–16168 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
[FR Doc. 2011–16217 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA522
RIN 0648–XA521
Fisheries of the South Atlantic and
Gulf of Mexico; South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council; Public Meeting
Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
AGENCY:
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting via
conference call.
AGENCY:
The South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (SAFMC) will
hold a meeting of its Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) to discuss
the Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC)
recommendation for Atlantic Migratory
Group Spanish mackerel and
assessment priorities for 2013. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Friday, July 29, 2011, via conference
call from 1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. E.D.T.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: Listening stations are
available at the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, 4055 Faber Place
Drive #201, North Charleston, SC 29405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
Iverson, Public Information Officer,
4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, North
Charleston, SC 29405; telephone: (843)
571–4366; e-mail:
Kim.Iverson@safmc.net.
SUMMARY:
Under the
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorized Act,
the SSC is the body responsible for
reviewing the Council’s scientific
materials. The SSC will discuss an
alternative approach to deriving ABC for
Atlantic Migratory Group Spanish
Mackerel and SEDAR assessment
priorities for 2013.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Special Accommodations
The meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to the
Council office (see ADDRESSES) at least 3
business days prior to the meeting.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
The South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council) will
hold a meeting of its Law Enforcement
AP in Orlando, FL.
DATES: The meeting will take place July
20, 2011. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Marriott Renaissance Orlando Hotel,
5445 Forbes Place, Orlando, FL 32812;
telephone: (407) 240–1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
Iverson, Public Information Officer,
South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council, 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite
201, N. Charleston, SC 29405;
telephone: (843) 571–4366 or toll free:
(866) SAFMC–10; fax: (843) 769–4520;
e-mail: kim.iverson@safmc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members
of the Law Enforcement AP will meet
from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on July 20,
2011.
The Law Enforcement AP will review
the Comprehensive Annual Catch Limit
(ACL) Amendment as well as Regulatory
Amendment 11 to the Snapper Grouper
Fishery Management Plan. The
Comprehensive ACL Amendment
establishes ACLs and Accountability
Measures for species not undergoing
overfishing in order to comply with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. Changes affect
snapper grouper complex species,
dolphin, wahoo and golden crab.
Regulatory Amendment 11 addresses
the current 240-foot depth closure (also
known as the 40-fathom closure)
implemented through Amendment 17B.
The closure currently applies to
deepwater snapper grouper species
(snowy grouper, blueline tilefish,
yellowedge grouper, misty grouper,
queen snapper, and silk snapper) and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
was put in place to minimize bycatch of
speckled hind and warsaw grouper. The
AP will receive an overview of the
amendments and provide
recommendations.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during this meeting. Action will
be restricted to those issues specifically
listed in this notice and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, provided the public has been
notified of the Council’s intent to take
final action to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
The meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
auxiliary aids should be directed to the
Council office (see ADDRESSES) 3 days
prior to the meeting.
Note: The times and sequence specified in
this agenda are subject to change.
Dated: June 23, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–16170 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA402
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Coastal
Commercial Fireworks Displays at
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary, CA
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as
amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) to the
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary (MBNMS) to incidentally
harass, by Level B harassment only, two
species of marine mammals incidental
to permitting professional fireworks
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
displays within the sanctuary in
California waters.
DATES: This authorization is effective
from July 4, 2011, through July 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and
application are available by writing to
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
A copy of the application containing
a list of the references used in this
document may be obtained by writing to
the above address, telephoning the
contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) or visiting the
Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Supplemental documents are available
at the same site. Documents cited in this
notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the
aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben
Laws, NMFS, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1371 (a)(5)(D)) directs the
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
authorize, upon request, the incidental,
but not intentional, taking by
harassment of small numbers of marine
mammals of a species or population
stock, by United States citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental taking of
small numbers of marine mammals shall
be granted if NMFS finds that the taking
will have a negligible impact on the
species or stock(s), and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant). The
authorization must set forth the
permissible methods of taking, other
means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on the species or stock
and its habitat, and monitoring and
reporting of such takings. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ‘‘* * * an impact resulting
from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
establishes a 45-day time limit for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
NMFS’ review of an application
followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of small numbers of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the public comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny the
authorization.
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On April 28, 2011, NMFS received an
application from the MBNMS requesting
an IHA under section 101 (a)(5)(D) of
the MMPA for the potential harassment
of California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) and harbor seals (Phoca
vitulina) incidental to coastal fireworks
displays conducted at MBNMS under
permits issued by MBNMS. This would
effectively constitute a renewed
authorization; NMFS first issued an IHA
to MBNMS on July 4, 2005 (70 FR
39235; July 7, 2005), and subsequently
issued five-year regulations governing
the annual issuance of Letters of
Authorization under section 101
(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (71 FR 40928;
July 19, 2006). Those regulations expire
on July 3, 2011.
The MBNMS adjoins 276 mi (444 km),
or approximately 25 percent, of the
central California coastline, and
encompasses ocean waters from mean
high tide to an average of 25 mi (40 km)
offshore between Rocky Point in Marin
County and Cambria in San Luis Obispo
County. Fireworks displays have been
conducted over current MBNMS waters
for many years as part of national and
community celebrations (e.g.,
Independence Day, municipal
anniversaries), and to foster public use
and enjoyment of the marine
environment. In central California,
marine venues are the preferred setting
for fireworks in order to optimize public
access and avoid the fire hazard
associated with terrestrial display sites.
Many fireworks displays occur at the
height of the dry season in central
California, when area vegetation is
particularly prone to ignition from
sparks or embers.
In 1992, the MBNMS was the first
national marine sanctuary (NMS) to be
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37789
designated along urban shorelines and
therefore has addressed many regulatory
issues previously not encountered by
the NMS program. Since 1993, the
MBNMS, a component of NOAA’s
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries,
has processed requests for the
professional display of fireworks that
affect the sanctuary. The MBNMS has
determined that debris fallout (i.e.,
spent pyrotechnic materials) from
fireworks events may constitute a
discharge into the sanctuary and thus
violate sanctuary regulations, unless a
permit is issued by the superintendent.
Therefore, sponsors of fireworks
displays conducted in the MBNMS are
required to obtain sanctuary
authorization prior to conducting such
displays (see 15 CFR 922.132).
Authorization of professional firework
displays has required a steady
refinement of policies and procedures
related to this activity. Fireworks
displays, and the attendant increase in
human activity, are known to result in
the behavioral disturbance of pinnipeds,
although there is no known instance of
this disturbance resulting in more than
temporary abandonment of haul-outs.
As a result, pinnipeds hauled out in the
vicinity of permitted fireworks displays
may exhibit behavioral responses that
indicate incidental take by Level B
harassment under the MMPA. Numbers
of California sea lions and harbor seals,
the species that may be subject to
harassment, have been recorded
extensively at four regions where
fireworks displays are permitted in
MBNMS. Based on these data and
MBNMS’ estimated maximum number
of fireworks displays, NMFS has
authorized MBNMS’ request to
incidentally harass up to 6,170
California sea lions and 1,065 harbor
seals during the one-year time span of
the proposed IHA, from July 4, 2011 to
July 3, 2012.
Description of the Specified Activity
In accordance with regulations
implementing the MMPA, NMFS
published notice of the proposed IHA in
the Federal Register on May 20, 2011
(76 FR 29196). A complete description
of the action was included in that notice
and will not be reproduced here.
The MBNMS has issued 87 permits
for professional fireworks displays since
1993. However, the MBNMS staff
projects that as many as 20 coastal
displays per year may be conducted in,
or adjacent to, MBNMS boundaries in
the future. Thus, the number of displays
will be limited to not more than 20
events per year in four specific areas
along 276 mi (444 km) of coastline.
Fireworks displays will not exceed 30
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
37790
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices
minutes (with the exception of up to
two displays per year, each not to
exceed 1 hour) in duration and will
occur with an average frequency of less
than or equal to once every two months
within each of the four prescribed
display areas. NMFS believes—and
extensive monitoring data indicates—
that incidental take resulting from
fireworks displays will be, at most, the
short-term flushing and evacuation of
non-breeding haul-out sites by
California sea lions and harbor seals.
MBNMS’ four designated display
areas, which were described in detail in
NMFS’ notice of proposed IHA (76 FR
29196), include Half Moon Bay, the
Santa Cruz/Soquel area, the
northeastern Monterey Peninsula, and
Cambria (Santa Rosa Creek). The
number of displays will be limited to
not more than 20 total events per year
within these four specific areas
combined, along the whole 276 mi (444
km) of coastline. This effectively limits
permitted fireworks displays to
approximately five percent of the
MBNMS coastline.
A more detailed description of the
fireworks displays permitted by
MBNMS may be found in MBNMS’
application, in MBNMS’ Assessment of
Pyrotechnic Displays and Impacts
within the MBNMS 1993–2001 (2001),
or in the report of Marine Mammal
Acoustic and Behavioral Monitoring for
the MBNMS Fireworks Display, 4 July
2007 (2007), which are available at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments and Responses
On May 20, 2011, NMFS published a
notice of the proposed IHA (76 FR
29196) in response to MBNMS’ request
to take marine mammals incidental to
permitting of coastal fireworks displays
and requested comments and
information concerning that request.
During the 30-day public comment
period, NMFS received comments from
the Marine Mammal Commission
(MMC). The MMC recommended that
NMFS issue the requested
authorization, subject to inclusion of the
proposed mitigation and monitoring
measures. As described in this
document, NMFS has included the
proposed measures in the final
authorization.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species that may
be harassed incidental to permitted
fireworks displays are the harbor seal
and California sea lion. Neither of these
species is listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA, nor are they
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
categorized as depleted under the
MMPA. NMFS presented a more
detailed discussion of the status of these
stocks and their occurrence in the action
area in the notice of the proposed IHA
(76 FR 29196; May 20, 2011).
Potential Effects of the Activity on
Marine Mammals
NMFS has determined that permitted
coastal fireworks displays, as outlined
in the project description, have the
potential to result in behavioral
harassment of California sea lions and
harbor seals that may be swimming,
foraging, or resting in the display
vicinity. Based on the analysis
contained in NMFS’ notice of proposed
IHA, it is unlikely that this project will
result in temporary or permanent
hearing impairment or non-auditory
physical or physiological effects for any
marine mammal. Given the frequency,
duration, and intensity of sounds
(maximum measured 82 dB sound
pressure level for larger aerial shells)
that marine mammals may be exposed
to, it is unlikely that they would sustain
temporary, much less permanent,
hearing impairment during fireworks
displays. Observations of behavioral
disturbance of pinnipeds, resulting from
sound and light from fireworks displays
or from increased vessel traffic in the
vicinity of a display, have been limited
to short-term disturbance only.
The effects of behavioral disturbance
resulting from this project are difficult
to predict, as behavioral responses to
sound are highly variable and context
specific. A number of factors may
influence an animal’s response to noise,
including its previous experience, its
auditory sensitivity, its biological and
social status (including age and sex),
and its behavioral state and activity at
the time of exposure. These behavioral
changes may include changes in
vocalization; visible startle response or
aggressive behavior; avoidance of areas
where noise sources are located; and/or
flight responses. Pinnipeds may
increase their time spent in water,
possibly to avoid disturbance on land.
Because permitted fireworks displays
are limited in number and are of short
duration, they are unlikely to result in
permanent displacement from a given
area. In addition, timing restrictions are
in place to ensure that no displays are
permitted during sensitive breeding
periods. Temporary avoidance of haulout areas resulting from fireworks
displays could be experienced by
individual marine mammals but would
not be likely to cause population level
impacts, or affect any individual’s longterm fitness.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Anticipated Effects on Habitat
NMFS provided a detailed discussion
of the potential effects of this action on
marine mammal habitat in the notice of
the proposed IHA (76 FR 29196; May
20, 2011). Coastal fireworks displays at
MBNMS will not result in permanent
impacts to habitats used directly by
marine mammals, such as haul-out sites,
and are unlikely to impact food sources
such as forage fish. As described in the
proposed IHA, impacts to habitat could
come through debris or chemical
residue from fireworks. However, no
negative impacts to water quality have
been detected, and it is unlikely that the
limited amount of fireworks used per
year would degrade habitats. In
addition, MBNMS requires permittees to
remove all debris following fireworks
displays. While some debris is likely to
remain, NMFS does not believe the
small amount of remaining debris is
likely to significantly impact the
environment, including marine
mammals or their habitat. Therefore, the
main impact issue associated with the
proposed activity will be temporarily
elevated noise levels and the associated
direct effects on marine mammals, as
discussed previously in this document,
and habitat is unlikely to suffer
significant impacts.
Mitigation
In order to issue an IHA under
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible
methods of taking pursuant to such
activity, and other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact on
such species or stock and its habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of
such species or stock for taking for
certain subsistence uses.
The MBNMS and NMFS worked to
craft a set of mitigation measures
designed to minimize fireworks impacts
on the marine environment, as well as
to outline the locations, frequency, and
conditions under which the MBNMS
will authorize marine fireworks
displays. These mitigation measures,
which were successfully implemented
under NMFS-issued ITAs from 2005–
2010, include four broad approaches for
managing fireworks displays:
• Establish a sanctuary-wide seasonal
prohibition to safeguard pinniped
reproductive periods. Fireworks events
will not be authorized between March 1
and June 30 of any year, since this
period is the primary reproductive
season for pinnipeds in MBNMS.
• Establish four conditional display
areas and prohibit displays along the
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices
remaining 95 percent of sanctuary
coastal areas. Permitted fireworks
displays will be confined to four
prescribed areas of the sanctuary while
prohibiting displays along the
remaining 95 percent of sanctuary
coastal areas. The conditional display
areas are located at Half Moon Bay, the
Santa Cruz/Soquel area, the
northeastern Monterey Peninsula, and
Cambria (Santa Rosa Creek).
• Create a per-annum limit on the
number of displays allowed in each
display area. There is a per-annum limit
of 20 displays along the entire sanctuary
coastline in order to prevent cumulative
negative environmental effects from
fireworks proliferation. Additionally,
displays will be authorized at a
frequency equal to or less than one
every two months in each area.
• Retain permitting requirements and
general and special restrictions for each
event. Fireworks displays will not
exceed thirty minutes with the
exception of two longer displays per
year that will not exceed one hour.
Standard requirements include the use
of a ramp-up period, wherein salutes are
not allowed in the first five minutes of
the display; the removal of plastic and
aluminum labels and wrappings; and
post-show reporting and cleanup. The
sanctuary will continue to assess
displays and restrict the number of
aerial salute effects on a case-by-case
basis, and will implement general and
special restrictions unique to each
fireworks event as necessary.
These measures are designed to
prevent an incremental proliferation of
fireworks displays and disturbance
throughout the sanctuary and minimize
area of impact by confining displays to
primary traditional use areas. They also
effectively remove fireworks impacts
from 95 percent of the sanctuary’s
coastal areas, place an annual quota and
multiple permit conditions on the
displays authorized within the
remaining five percent of the coast, and
impose a sanctuary-wide seasonal
prohibition on all fireworks displays.
These measures were developed in
order to assure that protected species
and habitats are not jeopardized by
fireworks activities. They have been
well received by local fireworks
sponsors who have pledged their
cooperation in protecting sanctuary
resources.
NMFS has carefully evaluated the
mitigation measures described
previously and considered their
effectiveness in past implementation to
determine whether they are likely to
effect the least practicable adverse
impact on the affected marine mammal
species and stocks and their habitat. Our
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
37791
evaluation of potential measures
includes consideration of the following
factors in relation to one another: (1)
The manner in which, and the degree to
which, the successful implementation of
the measure is expected to minimize
adverse impacts to marine mammals, (2)
the proven or likely efficacy of the
specific measure to minimize adverse
impacts as planned; (3) the
practicability of the measure for
applicant implementation, including
consideration of personnel safety, and
practicality of implementation.
It is unlikely that injury, serious
injury, or mortality to marine mammals
would result from any permitted coastal
fireworks display. The impacts of the
project will likely be limited to
temporary behavioral disturbance.
However, to reduce the amount and
degree of behavioral disturbance that
occurs, NMFS and MBNMS have
developed the previously described
mitigation measures. Based on
evaluation of the applicant’s proposed
measures and their efficacy over the
past 6 years of permitting fireworks,
NMFS has determined that these
mitigation measures provide the means
of effecting the least practicable impact
on marine mammal species or stocks
and their habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds,
and areas of similar significance.
In order to continue the long-term
understanding of the effects of fireworks
displays on pinnipeds, as well as to
estimate levels of incidental take and
ensure compliance with MMPA
authorizations, MBNMS will require its
applicants to conduct a pre-event
census of local marine mammal
populations within the acute fireworks
impact area no earlier than 36 hours
prior to the display. Each applicant will
also be required to conduct post-event
monitoring in the acute fireworks
impact area to record injured or dead
marine mammals, within 24 hours of
completion of the display. In addition,
applicants will be required to notify
NMFS and the local stranding network
of any injured or dead marine mammals
discovered during post-event
monitoring.
MBNMS must submit a draft annual
monitoring report to NMFS within 60
days after the conclusion of the calendar
year. MBNMS must submit a final
annual monitoring report to the NMFS
within thirty days after receiving
comments from NMFS on the draft
report. If no comments are received
from NMFS, the draft report will be
considered to be the final report. In
addition, the MBNMS will continue to
make its information available to other
marine mammal researchers upon
request.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an
activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of the
MMPA states that NMFS must set forth
‘‘requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such
taking’’. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13)
indicate that requests for IHAs must
include the suggested means of
accomplishing the necessary monitoring
and reporting that will result in
increased knowledge of the species and
of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are
expected to be present.
The MBNMS has monitored
commercial fireworks displays for
potential impacts to marine life and
habitats for many years, beginning in
1993. Though monitoring techniques
and intensity have varied over the years
and visual monitoring of wildlife
abundance and behavioral responses to
nighttime displays is challenging,
observed impacts have been consistent.
Wildlife activity nearest to disturbance
areas returns to normal (pre-display
species distribution, abundance, and
activity patterns) within 12–15 hours,
and no signs of wildlife injury or
mortality have ever been discovered as
a result of managed fireworks displays.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
NMFS is authorizing MBNMS to take
harbor seals and California sea lions, by
Level B harassment only, incidental to
permitting of coastal fireworks displays.
These activities are expected to harass
marine mammals present in the vicinity
of the displays through behavioral
disturbance only, in the form of
temporary evacuation of usual and
accustomed haul-out sites. The
estimated take of sea lions and harbor
seals was determined by using a
synthesis of information, including
unpublished data gathered by MBNMS
biologists at the specific display sites,
unpublished aerial survey data from
Point Piedras Blancas to Bodega Rock,
results of independent surveys
conducted in the MBNMS and personal
communication with those researchers,
and population estimates from surveys
covering larger geographic areas.
Numbers of animals that may be present
were analyzed for four general areas:
Half Moon Bay (HMB), North Monterey
Bay (NMB; containing Santa Cruz/
Soquel sites), South Monterey Bay
(SMB; containing Monterey Peninsula
sites), and Cambria. Table 1 details the
total number of authorized takes.
Methodology of take estimation was
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
37792
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices
discussed in detail in NMFS’ notice of
proposed IHA (76 FR 29196; May 20,
2011).
TABLE 1—AUTHORIZED NUMBERS OF INCIDENTAL MARINE MAMMAL TAKES, BY DISPLAY AREA
Display location
Estimated maximum number of animals
present per event (total)
Estimated maximum
number of events per
year
Time of year
California sea lions
Harbor seals
HMB .........................................................................
NMB (Santa Cruz) ...................................................
NMB (Aptos) ............................................................
NMB (Capitola) ........................................................
SMB (Monterey) .......................................................
SMB (Monterey) .......................................................
SMB (Pacific Grove) ................................................
Cambria* (high intensity) .........................................
Cambria* (low intensity) ...........................................
July ............................
October ......................
October ......................
May ............................
July ............................
January ......................
July ............................
July ............................
July ............................
4
3
2
1
4
1
1
2
2
100 (400)
190 (570)
5 (10)
190
800 (3,200)
1,500
150
50 (100)
25 (50)
65 (260)
5 (15)
50 (100)
50
60 (240)
60
100
60 (120)
60 (120)
Total ..................................................................
....................................
20
6,170
1,065
* Intensity refers to public and private displays. Private displays tend to be of lower intensity, and would thus likely result in lower numbers of
California sea lions disturbed. Harbor seals are more sensitive to stimuli than California sea lions and numbers disturbed would likely be
unchanged.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers
Analysis and Determination
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘ * * *
an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
In determining whether or not
authorized incidental take will have a
negligible impact on affected species
stocks, NMFS considers a number of
criteria regarding the impact of the
proposed action, including the number,
nature, intensity, and duration of Level
B harassment take that may occur. The
effects of coastal fireworks displays are
typically limited to short term and
localized changes in behavior, including
temporary departures from haul-outs to
avoid the sight and sound of
commercial fireworks. Fireworks
displays are inherently highly limited in
duration and will not occur on
consecutive days at any fireworks site in
the sanctuary. The mitigation measures
proposed by MBNMS—and
implemented as components of NMFS’
incidental take authorizations since
2005—further reduce potential impacts.
As described previously, these measures
ensure that permitted fireworks displays
avoid times of importance for breeding,
as well as limiting displays to five
percent of sanctuary coastline that is
already heavily used by humans, and
generally limiting the overall amount
and intensity of activity. No take by
injury and/or death is anticipated, and
harassment takes will be at the lowest
level practicable due to incorporation of
the mitigation measures mentioned
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
previously in this document.
Additionally, the MBNMS fireworks
displays will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of
marine mammal stocks for subsistence
use, as there are no subsistence uses for
California sea lions or harbor seals in
California waters.
As shown in Table 1, at all four
designated display sites combined,
twenty fireworks events per year could
likely disturb a maximum total of 6,170
California sea lions out of a total
estimated population of 238,000. This
number is small relative to the
population size (2.6 percent). For harbor
seals, a maximum of 1,065 animals out
of a total estimated population of 34,233
could be disturbed within the sanctuary
as a result of twenty fireworks events
per year at all four designated display
sites combined. These numbers are
small relative to the population size (3.1
percent).
Based on the foregoing analysis,
behavioral disturbance to marine
mammals in MBNMS will be of low
intensity and limited duration. To
ensure minimal disturbance, MBNMS
will implement the mitigation measures
described previously, which NMFS has
determined will serve as the means for
effecting the least practicable adverse
effect on marine mammals stocks or
populations and their habitat. NMFS
finds that MBNMS’ permitting of coastal
fireworks displays will result in the
incidental take of small numbers of
marine mammals, and that the
authorized number of takes will have no
more than a negligible impact on the
affected species and stocks.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species for Taking for Subsistence Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of marine mammals implicated by this
action.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
There are no ESA-listed marine
mammals under NMFS’ jurisdiction
found in the action area that will be
affected by the action; therefore, no
consultation under the ESA is required
by NMFS.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as implemented by
the regulations published by the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6, NMFS and
MBNMS prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) on the Issuance of
Regulations Authorizing Incidental Take
of Marine Mammals and Issuance of
National Marine Sanctuary
Authorizations for Coastal Commercial
Fireworks Displays within the Monterey
Bay National Marine Sanctuary, to
consider the direct, indirect and
cumulative effects to the human
environment resulting from issuance of
sanctuary permits for fireworks displays
and issuance of an IHA to MBNMS.
NMFS signed a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) on June 21,
2006. NMFS has reviewed MBNMS’s
application and determined that there
are no substantial changes to the
proposed action and that there are no
new direct, indirect, or cumulative
effects to the human environment
resulting from issuance of an IHA to
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices
MBNMS. Therefore, NMFS has
determined that a new or supplemental
EA or Environmental Impact Statement
is unnecessary, and reaffirms the
existing FONSI for this action. The
existing EA and FONSI for this action
are available for review at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm.
Determinations
NMFS has determined that the impact
of conducting the specific activities
described in this notice and in the IHA
request in the specific geographic region
in California may result, at worst, in a
temporary modification in behavior
(Level B harassment) of small numbers
of marine mammals. Further, this
activity is expected to result in a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stocks of marine mammals. The
provision requiring that the activity not
have an unmitigable impact on the
availability of the affected species or
stock of marine mammals for
subsistence uses is not implicated for
this action.
Authorization
As a result of these determinations,
NMFS has issued an IHA to MBNMS to
permit fireworks displays in the coastal
waters of California from the period of
July 4, 2011, through July 3, 2012,
provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
Dated: June 23, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–16204 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 11–C0005]
Viking Range Corporation, Provisional
Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement
and Order
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
16:46 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: June 21, 2011.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
Settlement Agreement
1. In accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20,
Viking Range Corporation (‘‘Viking’’)
and the staff (‘‘Staff’’) of the United
States Consumer Product Safety
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby
enter into this Settlement Agreement
(‘‘Agreement’’) under the Consumer
Product Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’). The
Agreement and the incorporated
attached Order resolve the Staff’s
allegations set forth below.
2. The Staff is the staff of the
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
an independent federal regulatory
agency established pursuant to, and
responsible for, the enforcement of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089.
3. Viking is a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State
of Mississippi, with its principal
corporate office located at 111 W. Front
Street, Greenwood, Mississippi.
Staff Allegations
It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally-accepted
Settlement Agreement with Viking
Range Corporation, containing a civil
penalty of $450,000.00.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 11–C0005, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William J. Moore, Trial Attorney,
Division of Enforcement and
Information, Office of the General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408;
telephone (301) 504–7583.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
ADDRESSES:
The Parties
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
SUMMARY:
Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by July 13,
2011.
DATES:
4. Between 1999 and April 2006,
Viking manufactured and distributed
approximately forty-five thousand
(45,000) built-in, 48 inch, side-by-side
refrigerators and 36 inch refrigerators
with bottom freezers under the Viking
brand name (the ‘‘Refrigerators’’). The
Refrigerators were sold nationwide
through retailers and authorized Viking
distributors for between $4,700 and
$6,400.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37793
5. The Refrigerators are ‘‘consumer
products’’ and, at all times relevant
hereto, Viking was a ‘‘manufacturer’’ of
these consumer products, which were
‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those
terms are defined or used in sections
3(a)(5), (8) and (11) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8) and (11).
6. The Refrigerators are defective
because the ‘‘tower’’ hinges attaching
the Refrigerator door to the cabinet can
detach, allowing the door to fall on
consumers.
7. Viking received its first complaints
involving hinge failure in January 2001
and introduced redesigned hinges by
January 2002.
8. By September 2006, Viking stopped
using the ‘‘tower’’ hinge on new
production. By April 2008, Viking had
received eight injury complaints. In
April 2008, Viking developed a new
field repair fix kit for consumers whose
refrigerators exhibited problems with
the hinges.
9. Despite being aware of the
information set forth in Paragraphs six
through eight, Viking did not report to
the Commission until April of 2009. By
that time, Viking was aware of at least
ten injury reports involving Refrigerator
hinge failures. The Refrigerators were
recalled in June of 2009.
10. Although Viking had obtained
sufficient information to reasonably
support the conclusion that the
Refrigerators contained a defect which
could create a substantial product
hazard, or created an unreasonable risk
of serious injury or death, Viking failed
to immediately inform the Commission
of such defect or risk as required by
sections 15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). In failing to do
so, Viking knowingly violated section
19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2068(a)(4) as the term ‘‘knowingly’’ is
defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2069(d).
11. Pursuant to section 20 of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Viking is subject
to civil penalties for its knowing failure
to report as required under section 15(b)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
Response of Viking Range Corporation
12. Viking denies the allegations of
the Staff that the Refrigerators contain a
defect which could create a substantial
product hazard or create an
unreasonable risk of serious injury or
death, and denies that it violated the
reporting requirements of Section 15(b)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
Agreement of the Parties
13. Under the CPSA, the Commission
has jurisdiction over this matter and
over Viking.
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37788-37793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16204]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XA402
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Coastal Commercial Fireworks
Displays at Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to
the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) to incidentally
harass, by Level B harassment only, two species of marine mammals
incidental to permitting professional fireworks
[[Page 37789]]
displays within the sanctuary in California waters.
DATES: This authorization is effective from July 4, 2011, through July
3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and application are available by writing
to Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
A copy of the application containing a list of the references used
in this document may be obtained by writing to the above address,
telephoning the contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) or visiting the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications. Supplemental documents are
available at the same site. Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular business hours, at the
aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Laws, NMFS, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1371 (a)(5)(D)) directs
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to authorize, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking by harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals of a species or population stock, by United States
citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial
fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are
made and a notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental taking of small numbers of marine
mammals shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or stock(s), and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where relevant). The authorization must
set forth the permissible methods of taking, other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact on the species or stock and its
habitat, and monitoring and reporting of such takings. NMFS has defined
``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``* * * an impact resulting
from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and
is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA establishes a 45-day time limit
for NMFS' review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice
and comment period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental
harassment of small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the
close of the public comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the
authorization.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On April 28, 2011, NMFS received an application from the MBNMS
requesting an IHA under section 101 (a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for the
potential harassment of California sea lions (Zalophus californianus)
and harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) incidental to coastal fireworks
displays conducted at MBNMS under permits issued by MBNMS. This would
effectively constitute a renewed authorization; NMFS first issued an
IHA to MBNMS on July 4, 2005 (70 FR 39235; July 7, 2005), and
subsequently issued five-year regulations governing the annual issuance
of Letters of Authorization under section 101 (a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (71
FR 40928; July 19, 2006). Those regulations expire on July 3, 2011.
The MBNMS adjoins 276 mi (444 km), or approximately 25 percent, of
the central California coastline, and encompasses ocean waters from
mean high tide to an average of 25 mi (40 km) offshore between Rocky
Point in Marin County and Cambria in San Luis Obispo County. Fireworks
displays have been conducted over current MBNMS waters for many years
as part of national and community celebrations (e.g., Independence Day,
municipal anniversaries), and to foster public use and enjoyment of the
marine environment. In central California, marine venues are the
preferred setting for fireworks in order to optimize public access and
avoid the fire hazard associated with terrestrial display sites. Many
fireworks displays occur at the height of the dry season in central
California, when area vegetation is particularly prone to ignition from
sparks or embers.
In 1992, the MBNMS was the first national marine sanctuary (NMS) to
be designated along urban shorelines and therefore has addressed many
regulatory issues previously not encountered by the NMS program. Since
1993, the MBNMS, a component of NOAA's Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries, has processed requests for the professional display of
fireworks that affect the sanctuary. The MBNMS has determined that
debris fallout (i.e., spent pyrotechnic materials) from fireworks
events may constitute a discharge into the sanctuary and thus violate
sanctuary regulations, unless a permit is issued by the superintendent.
Therefore, sponsors of fireworks displays conducted in the MBNMS are
required to obtain sanctuary authorization prior to conducting such
displays (see 15 CFR 922.132).
Authorization of professional firework displays has required a
steady refinement of policies and procedures related to this activity.
Fireworks displays, and the attendant increase in human activity, are
known to result in the behavioral disturbance of pinnipeds, although
there is no known instance of this disturbance resulting in more than
temporary abandonment of haul-outs. As a result, pinnipeds hauled out
in the vicinity of permitted fireworks displays may exhibit behavioral
responses that indicate incidental take by Level B harassment under the
MMPA. Numbers of California sea lions and harbor seals, the species
that may be subject to harassment, have been recorded extensively at
four regions where fireworks displays are permitted in MBNMS. Based on
these data and MBNMS' estimated maximum number of fireworks displays,
NMFS has authorized MBNMS' request to incidentally harass up to 6,170
California sea lions and 1,065 harbor seals during the one-year time
span of the proposed IHA, from July 4, 2011 to July 3, 2012.
Description of the Specified Activity
In accordance with regulations implementing the MMPA, NMFS
published notice of the proposed IHA in the Federal Register on May 20,
2011 (76 FR 29196). A complete description of the action was included
in that notice and will not be reproduced here.
The MBNMS has issued 87 permits for professional fireworks displays
since 1993. However, the MBNMS staff projects that as many as 20
coastal displays per year may be conducted in, or adjacent to, MBNMS
boundaries in the future. Thus, the number of displays will be limited
to not more than 20 events per year in four specific areas along 276 mi
(444 km) of coastline. Fireworks displays will not exceed 30
[[Page 37790]]
minutes (with the exception of up to two displays per year, each not to
exceed 1 hour) in duration and will occur with an average frequency of
less than or equal to once every two months within each of the four
prescribed display areas. NMFS believes--and extensive monitoring data
indicates--that incidental take resulting from fireworks displays will
be, at most, the short-term flushing and evacuation of non-breeding
haul-out sites by California sea lions and harbor seals.
MBNMS' four designated display areas, which were described in
detail in NMFS' notice of proposed IHA (76 FR 29196), include Half Moon
Bay, the Santa Cruz/Soquel area, the northeastern Monterey Peninsula,
and Cambria (Santa Rosa Creek). The number of displays will be limited
to not more than 20 total events per year within these four specific
areas combined, along the whole 276 mi (444 km) of coastline. This
effectively limits permitted fireworks displays to approximately five
percent of the MBNMS coastline.
A more detailed description of the fireworks displays permitted by
MBNMS may be found in MBNMS' application, in MBNMS' Assessment of
Pyrotechnic Displays and Impacts within the MBNMS 1993-2001 (2001), or
in the report of Marine Mammal Acoustic and Behavioral Monitoring for
the MBNMS Fireworks Display, 4 July 2007 (2007), which are available
at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm.
Comments and Responses
On May 20, 2011, NMFS published a notice of the proposed IHA (76 FR
29196) in response to MBNMS' request to take marine mammals incidental
to permitting of coastal fireworks displays and requested comments and
information concerning that request. During the 30-day public comment
period, NMFS received comments from the Marine Mammal Commission (MMC).
The MMC recommended that NMFS issue the requested authorization,
subject to inclusion of the proposed mitigation and monitoring
measures. As described in this document, NMFS has included the proposed
measures in the final authorization.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species that may be harassed incidental to
permitted fireworks displays are the harbor seal and California sea
lion. Neither of these species is listed as threatened or endangered
under the ESA, nor are they categorized as depleted under the MMPA.
NMFS presented a more detailed discussion of the status of these stocks
and their occurrence in the action area in the notice of the proposed
IHA (76 FR 29196; May 20, 2011).
Potential Effects of the Activity on Marine Mammals
NMFS has determined that permitted coastal fireworks displays, as
outlined in the project description, have the potential to result in
behavioral harassment of California sea lions and harbor seals that may
be swimming, foraging, or resting in the display vicinity. Based on the
analysis contained in NMFS' notice of proposed IHA, it is unlikely that
this project will result in temporary or permanent hearing impairment
or non-auditory physical or physiological effects for any marine
mammal. Given the frequency, duration, and intensity of sounds (maximum
measured 82 dB sound pressure level for larger aerial shells) that
marine mammals may be exposed to, it is unlikely that they would
sustain temporary, much less permanent, hearing impairment during
fireworks displays. Observations of behavioral disturbance of
pinnipeds, resulting from sound and light from fireworks displays or
from increased vessel traffic in the vicinity of a display, have been
limited to short-term disturbance only.
The effects of behavioral disturbance resulting from this project
are difficult to predict, as behavioral responses to sound are highly
variable and context specific. A number of factors may influence an
animal's response to noise, including its previous experience, its
auditory sensitivity, its biological and social status (including age
and sex), and its behavioral state and activity at the time of
exposure. These behavioral changes may include changes in vocalization;
visible startle response or aggressive behavior; avoidance of areas
where noise sources are located; and/or flight responses. Pinnipeds may
increase their time spent in water, possibly to avoid disturbance on
land. Because permitted fireworks displays are limited in number and
are of short duration, they are unlikely to result in permanent
displacement from a given area. In addition, timing restrictions are in
place to ensure that no displays are permitted during sensitive
breeding periods. Temporary avoidance of haul-out areas resulting from
fireworks displays could be experienced by individual marine mammals
but would not be likely to cause population level impacts, or affect
any individual's long-term fitness.
Anticipated Effects on Habitat
NMFS provided a detailed discussion of the potential effects of
this action on marine mammal habitat in the notice of the proposed IHA
(76 FR 29196; May 20, 2011). Coastal fireworks displays at MBNMS will
not result in permanent impacts to habitats used directly by marine
mammals, such as haul-out sites, and are unlikely to impact food
sources such as forage fish. As described in the proposed IHA, impacts
to habitat could come through debris or chemical residue from
fireworks. However, no negative impacts to water quality have been
detected, and it is unlikely that the limited amount of fireworks used
per year would degrade habitats. In addition, MBNMS requires permittees
to remove all debris following fireworks displays. While some debris is
likely to remain, NMFS does not believe the small amount of remaining
debris is likely to significantly impact the environment, including
marine mammals or their habitat. Therefore, the main impact issue
associated with the proposed activity will be temporarily elevated
noise levels and the associated direct effects on marine mammals, as
discussed previously in this document, and habitat is unlikely to
suffer significant impacts.
Mitigation
In order to issue an IHA under Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to such
activity, and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on such species or stock and its habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of such species or stock for
taking for certain subsistence uses.
The MBNMS and NMFS worked to craft a set of mitigation measures
designed to minimize fireworks impacts on the marine environment, as
well as to outline the locations, frequency, and conditions under which
the MBNMS will authorize marine fireworks displays. These mitigation
measures, which were successfully implemented under NMFS-issued ITAs
from 2005-2010, include four broad approaches for managing fireworks
displays:
Establish a sanctuary-wide seasonal prohibition to
safeguard pinniped reproductive periods. Fireworks events will not be
authorized between March 1 and June 30 of any year, since this period
is the primary reproductive season for pinnipeds in MBNMS.
Establish four conditional display areas and prohibit
displays along the
[[Page 37791]]
remaining 95 percent of sanctuary coastal areas. Permitted fireworks
displays will be confined to four prescribed areas of the sanctuary
while prohibiting displays along the remaining 95 percent of sanctuary
coastal areas. The conditional display areas are located at Half Moon
Bay, the Santa Cruz/Soquel area, the northeastern Monterey Peninsula,
and Cambria (Santa Rosa Creek).
Create a per-annum limit on the number of displays allowed
in each display area. There is a per-annum limit of 20 displays along
the entire sanctuary coastline in order to prevent cumulative negative
environmental effects from fireworks proliferation. Additionally,
displays will be authorized at a frequency equal to or less than one
every two months in each area.
Retain permitting requirements and general and special
restrictions for each event. Fireworks displays will not exceed thirty
minutes with the exception of two longer displays per year that will
not exceed one hour. Standard requirements include the use of a ramp-up
period, wherein salutes are not allowed in the first five minutes of
the display; the removal of plastic and aluminum labels and wrappings;
and post-show reporting and cleanup. The sanctuary will continue to
assess displays and restrict the number of aerial salute effects on a
case-by-case basis, and will implement general and special restrictions
unique to each fireworks event as necessary.
These measures are designed to prevent an incremental proliferation
of fireworks displays and disturbance throughout the sanctuary and
minimize area of impact by confining displays to primary traditional
use areas. They also effectively remove fireworks impacts from 95
percent of the sanctuary's coastal areas, place an annual quota and
multiple permit conditions on the displays authorized within the
remaining five percent of the coast, and impose a sanctuary-wide
seasonal prohibition on all fireworks displays. These measures were
developed in order to assure that protected species and habitats are
not jeopardized by fireworks activities. They have been well received
by local fireworks sponsors who have pledged their cooperation in
protecting sanctuary resources.
NMFS has carefully evaluated the mitigation measures described
previously and considered their effectiveness in past implementation to
determine whether they are likely to effect the least practicable
adverse impact on the affected marine mammal species and stocks and
their habitat. Our evaluation of potential measures includes
consideration of the following factors in relation to one another: (1)
The manner in which, and the degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure is expected to minimize adverse impacts
to marine mammals, (2) the proven or likely efficacy of the specific
measure to minimize adverse impacts as planned; (3) the practicability
of the measure for applicant implementation, including consideration of
personnel safety, and practicality of implementation.
It is unlikely that injury, serious injury, or mortality to marine
mammals would result from any permitted coastal fireworks display. The
impacts of the project will likely be limited to temporary behavioral
disturbance. However, to reduce the amount and degree of behavioral
disturbance that occurs, NMFS and MBNMS have developed the previously
described mitigation measures. Based on evaluation of the applicant's
proposed measures and their efficacy over the past 6 years of
permitting fireworks, NMFS has determined that these mitigation
measures provide the means of effecting the least practicable impact on
marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of
the MMPA states that NMFS must set forth ``requirements pertaining to
the monitoring and reporting of such taking''. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that requests for IHAs
must include the suggested means of accomplishing the necessary
monitoring and reporting that will result in increased knowledge of the
species and of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be present.
The MBNMS has monitored commercial fireworks displays for potential
impacts to marine life and habitats for many years, beginning in 1993.
Though monitoring techniques and intensity have varied over the years
and visual monitoring of wildlife abundance and behavioral responses to
nighttime displays is challenging, observed impacts have been
consistent. Wildlife activity nearest to disturbance areas returns to
normal (pre-display species distribution, abundance, and activity
patterns) within 12-15 hours, and no signs of wildlife injury or
mortality have ever been discovered as a result of managed fireworks
displays.
In order to continue the long-term understanding of the effects of
fireworks displays on pinnipeds, as well as to estimate levels of
incidental take and ensure compliance with MMPA authorizations, MBNMS
will require its applicants to conduct a pre-event census of local
marine mammal populations within the acute fireworks impact area no
earlier than 36 hours prior to the display. Each applicant will also be
required to conduct post-event monitoring in the acute fireworks impact
area to record injured or dead marine mammals, within 24 hours of
completion of the display. In addition, applicants will be required to
notify NMFS and the local stranding network of any injured or dead
marine mammals discovered during post-event monitoring.
MBNMS must submit a draft annual monitoring report to NMFS within
60 days after the conclusion of the calendar year. MBNMS must submit a
final annual monitoring report to the NMFS within thirty days after
receiving comments from NMFS on the draft report. If no comments are
received from NMFS, the draft report will be considered to be the final
report. In addition, the MBNMS will continue to make its information
available to other marine mammal researchers upon request.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
NMFS is authorizing MBNMS to take harbor seals and California sea
lions, by Level B harassment only, incidental to permitting of coastal
fireworks displays. These activities are expected to harass marine
mammals present in the vicinity of the displays through behavioral
disturbance only, in the form of temporary evacuation of usual and
accustomed haul-out sites. The estimated take of sea lions and harbor
seals was determined by using a synthesis of information, including
unpublished data gathered by MBNMS biologists at the specific display
sites, unpublished aerial survey data from Point Piedras Blancas to
Bodega Rock, results of independent surveys conducted in the MBNMS and
personal communication with those researchers, and population estimates
from surveys covering larger geographic areas. Numbers of animals that
may be present were analyzed for four general areas: Half Moon Bay
(HMB), North Monterey Bay (NMB; containing Santa Cruz/Soquel sites),
South Monterey Bay (SMB; containing Monterey Peninsula sites), and
Cambria. Table 1 details the total number of authorized takes.
Methodology of take estimation was
[[Page 37792]]
discussed in detail in NMFS' notice of proposed IHA (76 FR 29196; May
20, 2011).
Table 1--Authorized Numbers of Incidental Marine Mammal Takes, by Display Area
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated maximum number of animals
Estimated maximum present per event (total)
Display location Time of year number of events per ---------------------------------------
year California sea
lions Harbor seals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HMB.......................................... July....................................... 4 100 (400) 65 (260)
NMB (Santa Cruz)............................. October.................................... 3 190 (570) 5 (15)
NMB (Aptos).................................. October.................................... 2 5 (10) 50 (100)
NMB (Capitola)............................... May........................................ 1 190 50
SMB (Monterey)............................... July....................................... 4 800 (3,200) 60 (240)
SMB (Monterey)............................... January.................................... 1 1,500 60
SMB (Pacific Grove).......................... July....................................... 1 150 100
Cambria* (high intensity).................... July....................................... 2 50 (100) 60 (120)
Cambria* (low intensity)..................... July....................................... 2 25 (50) 60 (120)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................... ........................................... 20 6,170 1,065
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Intensity refers to public and private displays. Private displays tend to be of lower intensity, and would thus likely result in lower numbers of
California sea lions disturbed. Harbor seals are more sensitive to stimuli than California sea lions and numbers disturbed would likely be unchanged.
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers Analysis and Determination
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as `` * *
* an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
In determining whether or not authorized incidental take will have
a negligible impact on affected species stocks, NMFS considers a number
of criteria regarding the impact of the proposed action, including the
number, nature, intensity, and duration of Level B harassment take that
may occur. The effects of coastal fireworks displays are typically
limited to short term and localized changes in behavior, including
temporary departures from haul-outs to avoid the sight and sound of
commercial fireworks. Fireworks displays are inherently highly limited
in duration and will not occur on consecutive days at any fireworks
site in the sanctuary. The mitigation measures proposed by MBNMS--and
implemented as components of NMFS' incidental take authorizations since
2005--further reduce potential impacts. As described previously, these
measures ensure that permitted fireworks displays avoid times of
importance for breeding, as well as limiting displays to five percent
of sanctuary coastline that is already heavily used by humans, and
generally limiting the overall amount and intensity of activity. No
take by injury and/or death is anticipated, and harassment takes will
be at the lowest level practicable due to incorporation of the
mitigation measures mentioned previously in this document.
Additionally, the MBNMS fireworks displays will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of marine mammal stocks for
subsistence use, as there are no subsistence uses for California sea
lions or harbor seals in California waters.
As shown in Table 1, at all four designated display sites combined,
twenty fireworks events per year could likely disturb a maximum total
of 6,170 California sea lions out of a total estimated population of
238,000. This number is small relative to the population size (2.6
percent). For harbor seals, a maximum of 1,065 animals out of a total
estimated population of 34,233 could be disturbed within the sanctuary
as a result of twenty fireworks events per year at all four designated
display sites combined. These numbers are small relative to the
population size (3.1 percent).
Based on the foregoing analysis, behavioral disturbance to marine
mammals in MBNMS will be of low intensity and limited duration. To
ensure minimal disturbance, MBNMS will implement the mitigation
measures described previously, which NMFS has determined will serve as
the means for effecting the least practicable adverse effect on marine
mammals stocks or populations and their habitat. NMFS finds that MBNMS'
permitting of coastal fireworks displays will result in the incidental
take of small numbers of marine mammals, and that the authorized number
of takes will have no more than a negligible impact on the affected
species and stocks.
Impact on Availability of Affected Species for Taking for Subsistence
Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals implicated
by this action.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
There are no ESA-listed marine mammals under NMFS' jurisdiction
found in the action area that will be affected by the action;
therefore, no consultation under the ESA is required by NMFS.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as implemented by the regulations published
by the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and
NOAA Administrative Order 216-6, NMFS and MBNMS prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) on the Issuance of Regulations
Authorizing Incidental Take of Marine Mammals and Issuance of National
Marine Sanctuary Authorizations for Coastal Commercial Fireworks
Displays within the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, to consider
the direct, indirect and cumulative effects to the human environment
resulting from issuance of sanctuary permits for fireworks displays and
issuance of an IHA to MBNMS. NMFS signed a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) on June 21, 2006. NMFS has reviewed MBNMS's application
and determined that there are no substantial changes to the proposed
action and that there are no new direct, indirect, or cumulative
effects to the human environment resulting from issuance of an IHA to
[[Page 37793]]
MBNMS. Therefore, NMFS has determined that a new or supplemental EA or
Environmental Impact Statement is unnecessary, and reaffirms the
existing FONSI for this action. The existing EA and FONSI for this
action are available for review at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm.
Determinations
NMFS has determined that the impact of conducting the specific
activities described in this notice and in the IHA request in the
specific geographic region in California may result, at worst, in a
temporary modification in behavior (Level B harassment) of small
numbers of marine mammals. Further, this activity is expected to result
in a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks of marine
mammals. The provision requiring that the activity not have an
unmitigable impact on the availability of the affected species or stock
of marine mammals for subsistence uses is not implicated for this
action.
Authorization
As a result of these determinations, NMFS has issued an IHA to
MBNMS to permit fireworks displays in the coastal waters of California
from the period of July 4, 2011, through July 3, 2012, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
Dated: June 23, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-16204 Filed 6-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P