Vidalia Onions Grown in Georgia; Change in Late Payment and Interest Requirements on Past Due Assessments, 37618-37620 [2011-16139]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
37618
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
review, USDA received five comments
from interested parties. In general, the
comments addressed issues that were
the subject of a separate notice and
comment informal rulemaking action
concerning proposed changes to the
regulatory period under the marketing
order that was completed with
publication of a final rule on February
5, 2010 (75 FR 5879). It is noted that the
commenters also submitted similar
comments in response to that
rulemaking action. The comments have
been addressed in that rulemaking
proceeding.
In considering the order’s complexity,
AMS has determined that the marketing
order is not unduly complex.
During the review, the order was also
checked for duplication and overlap
with other regulations. AMS did not
identify any relevant Federal rules, or
State and local regulations that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
marketing order for California desert
grapes.
The marketing order was established
in 1980. Since its inception, AMS and
the California desert grape industry
have continuously monitored its
operations. Changes in regulations have
been implemented to reflect current
industry operating practices, and to
solve marketing problems as they occur.
The goal of these evaluations is to
assure that the order and the regulations
implemented under it fit the needs of
the industry and are consistent with the
Act.
The Committee meets whenever
needed to discuss the marketing order
and the various regulations issued
thereunder, and to determine if, or
what, changes may be necessary to
reflect current industry practices. As a
result, numerous regulatory changes
have been made over the years to
address industry operation changes and
to improve program administration. The
marketing order itself has never been
amended since its inception, but several
regulatory changes have been made
through informal rulemaking, as noted
above, to ensure the program continues
to meet the industry’s needs.
Accordingly, AMS has determined
that the California desert grape
marketing order should be continued.
The marketing order was established to
help the desert grape industry work
with USDA to solve marketing
problems. The marketing order
continues to be beneficial to producers,
handlers, and consumers.
AMS will continue to work with the
California desert grape industry in
maintaining an effective program.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:42 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: June 22, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–16136 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 955
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0016; FV11–955–1
FR]
Vidalia Onions Grown in Georgia;
Change in Late Payment and Interest
Requirements on Past Due
Assessments
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule changes the
delinquent assessment requirements in
effect under the marketing order for
Vidalia onions grown in Georgia (order).
The order regulates the handling of
Vidalia onions grown in Georgia and is
administered locally by the Vidalia
Onion Committee (Committee). This
rule establishes a late payment charge of
10 percent on unpaid assessments that
are 10 days past due and increases the
interest rate applied to delinquent
assessments from 1 percent to 1.5
percent per month. This action should
improve handler compliance with the
assessment and reporting provisions of
the order and help reduce the
Committee’s collection expenditures.
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennie M. Varela, Marketing Specialist,
or Christian D. Nissen, Regional
Manager, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or E-mail:
Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUMMARY:
This final
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 955, both as
amended (7 CFR part 955), regulating
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the handling of Vidalia onions grown in
Georgia, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule changes the delinquent
assessment requirements in effect under
the order. This rule establishes a late
payment charge of 10 percent on unpaid
assessments that are 10 days past due
and increases the interest rate applied to
delinquent assessments from 1 percent
to 1.5 percent per month. The change
was recommended unanimously by the
Committee at a meeting on February 17,
2011.
Section 955.42 of the order provides
authority for imposition of a late charge
or interest rate or both on delinquent
assessments. Section 955.142 of the
order’s rules and regulations prescribes
the requirements for delinquent
assessments. Prior to this action,
§ 955.142 specified that each handler
pay an interest charge of 1 percent per
month on any unpaid assessments and
accrued unpaid interest beginning the
day after the assessments are due. This
rule modifies § 955.142 to include a 10
percent late charge on delinquent
assessments that are 10 days past due
and increases the interest rate on
delinquent assessments to 1.5 percent
per month.
The order requires handlers to pay to
the Committee a pro rata assessment on
the volume of onions handled. The
volume of onions handled is based on
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
a monthly shipping report handlers are
required to submit to the Committee.
The monthly shipping report and its
associated assessments are due in the
Committee office by the fifth day of the
month following the month in which
the shipments were made, unless the
fifth day falls on a weekend or holiday,
and then the due date is the first prior
business day.
At the Committee’s January 20, 2011,
meeting, Committee staff indicated that
some handlers have been late in
reporting shipments and paying the
associated assessments, and that this
has been an ongoing problem for the last
few seasons. The handlers eventually
comply with the order requirements, but
late payments deprive the Committee of
expected operating income and increase
Committee costs.
Vidalia onions are typically shipped
from late April through August of each
year. This creates a compressed window
in which the Committee collects the
funds it uses throughout the year for its
operating expenses. In addition, the
Committee spends the majority of funds
allocated to promotion during the
shipping season. With promotional
expenses accounting for more than 50
percent of the Committee’s total budget,
timely payment of assessments is
necessary for the Committee to have
funds available to cover expenditures.
When several handlers are late in
paying assessments, the Committee can
lack the operating funds required. If
sufficient operating funds are not
available, the Committee has to borrow
money, increasing operating costs.
Further, there are costs associated
with trying to collect the delinquent
assessments. Some handlers require
numerous contacts from Committee staff
by mail and telephone, with others
requiring on-site visits from the
Committee’s compliance officer.
Throughout a season, these collection
activities expend time and resources.
In addition to the costs associated
with unpaid assessments, the failure of
handlers to report on time is also a
problem for the Committee. The
monthly shipping report serves several
functions, including providing volume
information on which handler
assessments are based. Without
complete shipping information, the
Committee is unable to provide timely
and accurate market information to the
industry. Also, monthly reports play an
important role in terms of order
compliance.
In an effort to address this problem,
the Committee staff has provided
additional information to handlers on
when reports and assessments are due
and on the importance of timely
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:42 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
submission. They have also increased
the number of reminder calls made to
handlers when submissions are late, and
visits have been made to delinquent
handler facilities to collect late reports
and payments. However, these efforts
have not been successful in resolving
this concern.
In its discussion of this issue, the
Committee agreed the current interest
rate applied to unpaid assessments does
not provide sufficient incentive for
handlers to turn in monthly reports and
their associated assessments on time. As
it stands, the rate is low enough that
some handlers view the interest rate as
a cost of doing business, and only
submit reports and assessments after
numerous contacts from the Committee
staff.
Committee members wanted to find a
solution that encourages handlers to
submit their reports and payments as
required. Initially, at its January
meeting, the Committee favored
changing the way the interest rate was
compounded and calculated as a way to
address the problem. However, it was
determined that such a change could
exceed what USDA considered
reasonable and customary under
marketing order programs. At its
meeting in February, the Committee
reviewed different scenarios imposed by
other marketing orders to address this
issue. Several other marketing orders
utilize late payment charges to
encourage compliance, and that
authority is available under the order for
Vidalia onions. As such, the Committee
decided to impose a late payment
charge, as well as increase the monthly
interest rate.
Committee members agreed that
establishing a 10 percent late charge on
late assessments helps provide some
additional incentive for handlers to
submit their reports and assessments on
time. The Committee also discussed an
appropriate grace period to set before
the late penalty was applied.
Recognizing the importance of the
timely receipt of reports and payments,
the Committee did not want to set an
overly long grace period. The
Committee agreed that 10 days provides
a sufficient buffer for those who may
mistakenly miss a due date, while still
supporting timely reports and
payments.
As an added incentive to report and
pay on time, the Committee also
believes the monthly interest charge on
delinquent assessments should also be
increased. Consequently, the Committee
unanimously recommended imposing a
late payment charge of 10 percent on
any assessments paid 10 days after the
date the shipping report and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37619
assessments are due and increasing the
interest rate applied to unpaid
assessments by .5 percent to 1.5 percent
per month.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 50 handlers
of Vidalia onions subject to regulation
under the order and around 80
producers in the designated production
area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those whose
annual receipts are less than $7,000,000,
and small agricultural producers are
defined as those whose annual receipts
are less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on National Agricultural
Statistical Service and Committee data,
the average annual grower price for
fresh Vidalia onions during the 2010
season was around $20 per 40-pound
container, and total Vidalia onion
shipments were around 4,503,000 40pound containers. Using available data,
more than 90 percent of Vidalia onion
handlers have annual receipts less than
$7,000,000. However, the average
receipts for Vidalia producers were
around $1,118,970 in 2010, which is
higher than the SBA threshold for small
producers. Assuming a normal
distribution, the majority of handlers of
Vidalia onions may be classified as
small entities, while the majority of
producers may be classified as large
entities, according to the SBA
definition.
This action establishes a late payment
charge of 10 percent on unpaid
assessments that are 10 days past due
and increases the interest rate applied to
delinquent assessments from 1 percent
to 1.5 percent per month. This change
is expected to motivate handlers to
submit shipping reports and
assessments on time. This change also
helps lower or offset the Committee’s
compliance expenditures associated
with delinquent reports and
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
37620
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
assessments. The authority for this
action is provided in § 955.42 of the
order. This change amends § 955.142.
The Committee unanimously
recommended this action at its February
17, 2011, meeting.
This rule does not impose any
additional costs on handlers that are
complying with the requirements under
the order. This action only represents
additional costs for handlers who are
delinquent in submitting their reports
and assessments. A 10 day grace period
is also provided before the late penalty
is applied, giving delinquent handlers
additional time to avoid the costs
associated with the late payment charge.
In addition, the late charge and interest
rate were considered reasonable by
industry members who participated in
the discussion of this issue. Since the
late payment charge and interest rate are
percentages of amounts due, the costs,
when applicable, are proportionate and
will not place an extra burden on small
entities as compared to large entities. In
addition, the industry overall benefits if
handler reports and assessments are
collected on time and the Committee’s
compliance costs are reduced,
regardless of entity size.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this change, including not making a
change to the delinquent assessment
requirements. However, a number of
members commented that if some
handlers are not paying on time, a
change was necessary. The Committee
also considered increasing the interest
rate accrual to daily rather than
monthly, but this option could result in
an interest charge that was
disproportionately large and considered
to be beyond the scope of what is
reasonable and customary under
marketing order programs. Thus, these
alternatives were rejected.
This action will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Vidalia onion handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies. As
noted in the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility analysis, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:42 Jun 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Vidalia onion industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the
February 17, 2011, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on
this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on May 13, 2011 (76 FR 27919).
Copies of the rule were mailed or sent
via facsimile to all Committee members
and Vidalia onion handlers. Finally, the
rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 15-day comment
period ending May 31, 2011, was
provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously mentioned address in the
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 955.142 is amended by
designating the first paragraph as
paragraph (a) and the second paragraph
as paragraph (b), and revising newly
designated paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 955.142
Delinquent assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Each handler shall pay interest of
1.5 percent per month on any
assessments levied pursuant to § 955.42
and on any accrued unpaid interest
beginning the day immediately after the
date the monthly assessments were due,
until the delinquent handler’s
assessments, plus applicable interest,
have been paid in full. In addition to the
interest charge, the Committee shall
impose a late payment charge on any
handler whose assessment payment has
not been received within 10 days of the
due date. The late payment charge shall
be 10 percent of the late assessments.
Dated: June 22, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–16139 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already
shipping Vidalia onions from the 2011
crop and the Committee wants to
implement these changes as soon as
possible. Further, handlers are aware of
this rule, which was recommended at a
public meeting. Also, a 15-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 955
Marketing agreements, Onions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 955 is amended as
follows:
PART 955—VIDALIA ONIONS GROWN
IN GEORGIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 955 continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 3
[Docket No. –2010–0009]
RIN 1557–AD33
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Parts 208 and 225
[Regulations H and Y; Docket No. R–1402]
RIN 7100–AD62
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 325
RIN 3064–AD58
Risk-Based Capital Standards:
Advanced Capital Adequacy
Framework—Basel II; Establishment of
a Risk-Based Capital Floor
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury; Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System; and the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC), Board of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 28, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37618-37620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16139]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 955
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0016; FV11-955-1 FR]
Vidalia Onions Grown in Georgia; Change in Late Payment and
Interest Requirements on Past Due Assessments
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule changes the delinquent assessment requirements in
effect under the marketing order for Vidalia onions grown in Georgia
(order). The order regulates the handling of Vidalia onions grown in
Georgia and is administered locally by the Vidalia Onion Committee
(Committee). This rule establishes a late payment charge of 10 percent
on unpaid assessments that are 10 days past due and increases the
interest rate applied to delinquent assessments from 1 percent to 1.5
percent per month. This action should improve handler compliance with
the assessment and reporting provisions of the order and help reduce
the Committee's collection expenditures.
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennie M. Varela, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Manager, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax:
(863) 325-8793, or E-mail: Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 955, both as amended (7 CFR part 955),
regulating the handling of Vidalia onions grown in Georgia, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule changes the delinquent assessment requirements in
effect under the order. This rule establishes a late payment charge of
10 percent on unpaid assessments that are 10 days past due and
increases the interest rate applied to delinquent assessments from 1
percent to 1.5 percent per month. The change was recommended
unanimously by the Committee at a meeting on February 17, 2011.
Section 955.42 of the order provides authority for imposition of a
late charge or interest rate or both on delinquent assessments. Section
955.142 of the order's rules and regulations prescribes the
requirements for delinquent assessments. Prior to this action, Sec.
955.142 specified that each handler pay an interest charge of 1 percent
per month on any unpaid assessments and accrued unpaid interest
beginning the day after the assessments are due. This rule modifies
Sec. 955.142 to include a 10 percent late charge on delinquent
assessments that are 10 days past due and increases the interest rate
on delinquent assessments to 1.5 percent per month.
The order requires handlers to pay to the Committee a pro rata
assessment on the volume of onions handled. The volume of onions
handled is based on
[[Page 37619]]
a monthly shipping report handlers are required to submit to the
Committee. The monthly shipping report and its associated assessments
are due in the Committee office by the fifth day of the month following
the month in which the shipments were made, unless the fifth day falls
on a weekend or holiday, and then the due date is the first prior
business day.
At the Committee's January 20, 2011, meeting, Committee staff
indicated that some handlers have been late in reporting shipments and
paying the associated assessments, and that this has been an ongoing
problem for the last few seasons. The handlers eventually comply with
the order requirements, but late payments deprive the Committee of
expected operating income and increase Committee costs.
Vidalia onions are typically shipped from late April through August
of each year. This creates a compressed window in which the Committee
collects the funds it uses throughout the year for its operating
expenses. In addition, the Committee spends the majority of funds
allocated to promotion during the shipping season. With promotional
expenses accounting for more than 50 percent of the Committee's total
budget, timely payment of assessments is necessary for the Committee to
have funds available to cover expenditures. When several handlers are
late in paying assessments, the Committee can lack the operating funds
required. If sufficient operating funds are not available, the
Committee has to borrow money, increasing operating costs.
Further, there are costs associated with trying to collect the
delinquent assessments. Some handlers require numerous contacts from
Committee staff by mail and telephone, with others requiring on-site
visits from the Committee's compliance officer. Throughout a season,
these collection activities expend time and resources.
In addition to the costs associated with unpaid assessments, the
failure of handlers to report on time is also a problem for the
Committee. The monthly shipping report serves several functions,
including providing volume information on which handler assessments are
based. Without complete shipping information, the Committee is unable
to provide timely and accurate market information to the industry.
Also, monthly reports play an important role in terms of order
compliance.
In an effort to address this problem, the Committee staff has
provided additional information to handlers on when reports and
assessments are due and on the importance of timely submission. They
have also increased the number of reminder calls made to handlers when
submissions are late, and visits have been made to delinquent handler
facilities to collect late reports and payments. However, these efforts
have not been successful in resolving this concern.
In its discussion of this issue, the Committee agreed the current
interest rate applied to unpaid assessments does not provide sufficient
incentive for handlers to turn in monthly reports and their associated
assessments on time. As it stands, the rate is low enough that some
handlers view the interest rate as a cost of doing business, and only
submit reports and assessments after numerous contacts from the
Committee staff.
Committee members wanted to find a solution that encourages
handlers to submit their reports and payments as required. Initially,
at its January meeting, the Committee favored changing the way the
interest rate was compounded and calculated as a way to address the
problem. However, it was determined that such a change could exceed
what USDA considered reasonable and customary under marketing order
programs. At its meeting in February, the Committee reviewed different
scenarios imposed by other marketing orders to address this issue.
Several other marketing orders utilize late payment charges to
encourage compliance, and that authority is available under the order
for Vidalia onions. As such, the Committee decided to impose a late
payment charge, as well as increase the monthly interest rate.
Committee members agreed that establishing a 10 percent late charge
on late assessments helps provide some additional incentive for
handlers to submit their reports and assessments on time. The Committee
also discussed an appropriate grace period to set before the late
penalty was applied. Recognizing the importance of the timely receipt
of reports and payments, the Committee did not want to set an overly
long grace period. The Committee agreed that 10 days provides a
sufficient buffer for those who may mistakenly miss a due date, while
still supporting timely reports and payments.
As an added incentive to report and pay on time, the Committee also
believes the monthly interest charge on delinquent assessments should
also be increased. Consequently, the Committee unanimously recommended
imposing a late payment charge of 10 percent on any assessments paid 10
days after the date the shipping report and assessments are due and
increasing the interest rate applied to unpaid assessments by .5
percent to 1.5 percent per month.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 50 handlers of Vidalia onions subject to
regulation under the order and around 80 producers in the designated
production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) as those whose annual receipts are
less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on National Agricultural Statistical Service and Committee
data, the average annual grower price for fresh Vidalia onions during
the 2010 season was around $20 per 40-pound container, and total
Vidalia onion shipments were around 4,503,000 40-pound containers.
Using available data, more than 90 percent of Vidalia onion handlers
have annual receipts less than $7,000,000. However, the average
receipts for Vidalia producers were around $1,118,970 in 2010, which is
higher than the SBA threshold for small producers. Assuming a normal
distribution, the majority of handlers of Vidalia onions may be
classified as small entities, while the majority of producers may be
classified as large entities, according to the SBA definition.
This action establishes a late payment charge of 10 percent on
unpaid assessments that are 10 days past due and increases the interest
rate applied to delinquent assessments from 1 percent to 1.5 percent
per month. This change is expected to motivate handlers to submit
shipping reports and assessments on time. This change also helps lower
or offset the Committee's compliance expenditures associated with
delinquent reports and
[[Page 37620]]
assessments. The authority for this action is provided in Sec. 955.42
of the order. This change amends Sec. 955.142. The Committee
unanimously recommended this action at its February 17, 2011, meeting.
This rule does not impose any additional costs on handlers that are
complying with the requirements under the order. This action only
represents additional costs for handlers who are delinquent in
submitting their reports and assessments. A 10 day grace period is also
provided before the late penalty is applied, giving delinquent handlers
additional time to avoid the costs associated with the late payment
charge. In addition, the late charge and interest rate were considered
reasonable by industry members who participated in the discussion of
this issue. Since the late payment charge and interest rate are
percentages of amounts due, the costs, when applicable, are
proportionate and will not place an extra burden on small entities as
compared to large entities. In addition, the industry overall benefits
if handler reports and assessments are collected on time and the
Committee's compliance costs are reduced, regardless of entity size.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this change, including not
making a change to the delinquent assessment requirements. However, a
number of members commented that if some handlers are not paying on
time, a change was necessary. The Committee also considered increasing
the interest rate accrual to daily rather than monthly, but this option
could result in an interest charge that was disproportionately large
and considered to be beyond the scope of what is reasonable and
customary under marketing order programs. Thus, these alternatives were
rejected.
This action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Vidalia onion
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the Vidalia onion industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the February
17, 2011, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on May 13, 2011 (76 FR 27919). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and Vidalia onion
handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 15-day comment period
ending May 31, 2011, was provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already shipping
Vidalia onions from the 2011 crop and the Committee wants to implement
these changes as soon as possible. Further, handlers are aware of this
rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 15-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 955
Marketing agreements, Onions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 955 is
amended as follows:
PART 955--VIDALIA ONIONS GROWN IN GEORGIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 955 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 955.142 is amended by designating the first paragraph as
paragraph (a) and the second paragraph as paragraph (b), and revising
newly designated paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 955.142 Delinquent assessments.
* * * * *
(b) Each handler shall pay interest of 1.5 percent per month on any
assessments levied pursuant to Sec. 955.42 and on any accrued unpaid
interest beginning the day immediately after the date the monthly
assessments were due, until the delinquent handler's assessments, plus
applicable interest, have been paid in full. In addition to the
interest charge, the Committee shall impose a late payment charge on
any handler whose assessment payment has not been received within 10
days of the due date. The late payment charge shall be 10 percent of
the late assessments.
Dated: June 22, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-16139 Filed 6-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P