Safety Zone, Pantego Creek; Belhaven, NC, 37267-37269 [2011-15972]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
West Yellowstone, MT, Yellowstone, NDB
RWY 1, Amdt 4
Oak Island, NC, Cape Fear Rgnl Jetport/
Howie Franklin Fld, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5,
Amdt 1B
Millville, NJ, Millville Muni, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 10, Orig
Monongahela, PA, Rostraver, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1A
Effective 25 AUG 2011
Unalakleet, AK, Unalakleet, RNAV (GPS) Y
RWY 33, Orig-A
Unalakleet, AK, Unalakleet, RNAV (GPS) Z
RWY 33, Orig
Riverside/Rubidoux, CA, Flabob, RNAV
(GPS)-A, Orig
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado
Springs Muni, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 35L,
Orig-A
Destin, FL, Destin-Fort Walton Beach, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 1
Destin, FL, Destin-Fort Walton Beach, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 32, Amdt 1
Homestead, FL, Homestead General Aviation,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Homestead, FL, Homestead General Aviation,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Cedartown, GA, Polk County Arpt-Cornelius
Moore Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Cedartown, GA, Polk County Arpt-Cornelius
Moore Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Cedartown, GA, Polk County Arpt-Cornelius
Moore Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Cedartown, GA, Polk County Arpt-Cornelius
Moore Field, VOR–A, Amdt 13
Cedartown, GA, Polk County Arpt-Cornelius
Moore Field, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS
RWY 9, Amdt 2B, CANCELLED
Cedartown, GA, Polk County Arpt-Cornelius
Moore Field, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS
RWY 27, Amdt 2A, CANCELLED
Macon, GA, Middle Georgia Rgnl, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1
Baltimore, MD, Martin State, LOC RWY 15,
Amdt 3
Baltimore, MD, Martin State, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 15, Amdt 1
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, GPS RWY
21, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, ILS OR
LOC/DME RWY 3, ILS RWY 3 (SA CAT I),
ILS RWY 3 (CAT II), ILS RWY 3 (CAT III),
Amdt 5
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, RNAV (GPS)
Y RWY 3, Amdt 3
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, RNAV (GPS)
Y RWY 21, Orig
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, RNAV (RNP)
Z RWY 3, Orig
Great Falls, MT, Great Falls Intl, RNAV (RNP)
Z RWY 21, Orig
Maxton, NC, Laurinburg-Maxton, ILS OR
LOC RWY 5, Amdt 2
Maxton, NC, Laurinburg-Maxton, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1
Maxton, NC, Laurinburg-Maxton, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1
Somerville, NJ, Somerset, RNAV (GPS) RWY
12, Orig-A
Fremont, OH, Sandusky County Rgnl, GPS
RWY 6, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Fremont, OH, Sandusky County Rgnl, GPS
RWY 24, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Fremont, OH, Sandusky County Rgnl, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 6, Orig
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jun 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
Fremont, OH, Sandusky County Rgnl, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 24, Orig
Fremont, OH, Sandusky County Rgnl,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Fremont, OH, Sandusky County Rgnl, VOR/
DME RWY 24, Amdt 1
Galion, OH, Galion Muni, Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle DP, Orig
Charleston, SC, Charleston AFB/Intl, ILS OR
LOC RWY 15, ILS RWY 15 (CAT II), Amdt
23
Charleston, SC, Charleston AFB/Intl, ILS OR
LOC/DME RWY 33, Amdt 8
Charleston, SC, Charleston AFB/Intl, RNAV
(GPS) Y RWY 3, Amdt 2
Charleston, SC, Charleston AFB/Intl, RNAV
(GPS) Y RWY 15, Amdt 3
Charleston, SC, Charleston AFB/Intl, RNAV
(GPS) Y RWY 21, Amdt 2
Charleston, SC, Charleston AFB/Intl, RNAV
(GPS) Y RWY 33, Amdt 3
Charleston, SC, Charleston Executive, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 3
Charleston, SC, Charleston Executive, RNAV
(GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 2
Crosbyton, TX, Crosbyton Muni, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Houston, TX, Lone Star Executive, ILS OR
LOC RWY 14, Amdt 2C
Sulphur Springs, TX, Sulphur Springs Muni,
Takeoff Minumims and Obstabcle DP,
Amdt 1
West Point, VA, Middle Peninsula Rgnl,
RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Snohomish, WA, Harvey Field, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
La Crosse, WI, La Crosse Muni, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 6
[FR Doc. 2011–15398 Filed 6–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0473]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Pantego Creek; Belhaven,
NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Pantego Creek, Belhaven, NC. This
action is necessary to protect the life
and property of the maritime public
from the hazards posed by fireworks
displays. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the
Pantego Creek during the Belhaven
Fourth of July Fireworks.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37267
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0473 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0473 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail CWO3 Joseph M.
Edge, Sector North Carolina Waterways
Management, Coast Guard; telephone
252–247–4525, e-mail
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the
event. The necessary information
regarding the date for this fireworks
event was not provided to the Coast
Guard with sufficient time to publish an
NPRM. The potential dangers associated
with a fireworks display, including
accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles and falling hot
embers makes a safety zone necessary to
provide for the safety of participants,
spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. For the safety
concerns noted, it is in the public
interest to have these regulations in
effect during the event. The Coast Guard
will issue broadcast notice to mariners
to advise vessel operators of
navigational restrictions. On scene Coast
Guard and local law enforcement
vessels will also provide actual notice to
mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
37268
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. The potential dangers posed
by fireworks displays conducted in
close proximity to transiting vessels
makes a safety zone necessary. Delaying
the effective date would be contrary to
the public interest, since immediate
action is needed to ensure the safety of
the event participants, patrol vessels,
spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. However, the
Coast Guard will provide advance
notifications to users of the effected
waterways via marine information
broadcasts, local notice to mariners,
along with sponsor event notifications
using commercial radio stations and
area newspapers.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background and Purpose
On July 4, 2011, fireworks will be
launched from a point on land near the
Pantego Creek to commemorate the
Nation’s birthday. The temporary safety
zone created by this rule is necessary to
ensure the safety of vessels and
spectators from hazards associated with
the fireworks display. Such hazards
include obstructions to the waterway
that may cause death, serious bodily
harm, or property damage. Establishing
a safety zone to control vessel
movement around the location of the
launch area will help ensure the safety
of persons and property in the vicinity
of this event and help minimize the
associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the setup, loading, and
launching of the Belhaven Fourth of
July Fireworks Display. The fireworks
display will occur from approximately
8:45 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on July 4, 2011.
The safety zone will encompass all
waters on the Pantego Creek within a
600 foot radius of the launch site on
land at position 35°32′35″ N, 076°37′46″
W from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on July 4,
2011. All geographic coordinates are
North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83).
The effect of this temporary safety zone
will be to restrict navigation in the
regulated area during the fireworks
display.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast guard
Captain of the Port or the designated on
scene patrol personnel. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector North Carolina or his designated
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jun 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
Notification of the temporary safety
zone will be provided to the public via
marine information broadcasts.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because
that it will have minimal impact on the
economy, will not interfere with other
agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients,
and will not raise any novel legal or
policy issues. The safety zone around
the launch area will be relatively small
and exist for only a minimal time. Thus,
restrictions on vessel movement within
any particular area of the Pantego Creek
are expected to be minimal. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels
may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by the Captain on the
Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
this portion of the Pantego Creek
between 8:45 p.m. and 9:45 p.m. on July
4, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
substantial number of small entities
because: (i) Vessels may transit around
the event zone with permission from the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander; (ii) the
zone is of limited size and duration; (iii)
in the event a vessel deems it necessary
to transit through the zone during the
enforcement period, the COTP may
afford the vessel the opportunity to do
so upon request. The Coast Guard will
give notice to the public via a Local
Notice to Mariners that the regulation is
in effect in order to allow mariners to
make alternate plans for transiting the
affected area.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jun 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
37269
Representative means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: This safety zone will
encompass all waters on the Pantego
Creek within a 600 foot radius of the
launch site on land at position 35°32′35″
N, 076°37′46″ W. All geographic
coordinates are North American Datum
1983 (NAD 83).
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in § 165.23 of this
part apply to the area described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through any portion of
the safety zone must first request
authorization from the Captain of the
Port, or a designated representative,
unless the Captain of the Port
previously announced via Marine Safety
Radio Broadcast on VHF Marine Band
Radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz) that this
regulation will not be enforced in that
portion of the safety zone. The Captain
of the Port can be contacted at telephone
number (910) 343–3882 or by radio on
VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13
and 16.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m.
on July 4, 2011 unless cancelled earlier
by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: June 7, 2011.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011–15972 Filed 6–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Coast Guard
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0501]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Safety Zone; Charleston Sharkfest
Swim, Charleston Harbor, Charleston,
SC
■
33 CFR Part 165
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–0473 to
read as follows:
AGENCY:
§ 165.T05–0473 Safety Zone, Pantego
Creek; Belhaven, NC
SUMMARY:
■
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port means
the Commander, Sector North Carolina.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Charleston Harbor, in
Charleston, South Carolina during the
Charleston Sharkfest Swim on Sunday,
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 123 (Monday, June 27, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37267-37269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15972]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0473]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Pantego Creek; Belhaven, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Pantego Creek, Belhaven, NC. This action is necessary to protect the
life and property of the maritime public from the hazards posed by
fireworks displays. This zone is intended to restrict vessels from a
portion of the Pantego Creek during the Belhaven Fourth of July
Fireworks.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0473 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0473 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail CWO3 Joseph M. Edge, Sector North
Carolina Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone 252-247-4525, e-
mail Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because immediate action is needed to
minimize potential danger to the public during the event. The necessary
information regarding the date for this fireworks event was not
provided to the Coast Guard with sufficient time to publish an NPRM.
The potential dangers associated with a fireworks display, including
accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles and falling
hot embers makes a safety zone necessary to provide for the safety of
participants, spectator craft and other vessels transiting the event
area. For the safety concerns noted, it is in the public interest to
have these regulations in effect during the event. The Coast Guard will
issue broadcast notice to mariners to advise vessel operators of
navigational restrictions. On scene Coast Guard and local law
enforcement vessels will also provide actual notice to mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for
[[Page 37268]]
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. The potential dangers posed by fireworks displays
conducted in close proximity to transiting vessels makes a safety zone
necessary. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the public
interest, since immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of the
event participants, patrol vessels, spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. However, the Coast Guard will provide
advance notifications to users of the effected waterways via marine
information broadcasts, local notice to mariners, along with sponsor
event notifications using commercial radio stations and area
newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On July 4, 2011, fireworks will be launched from a point on land
near the Pantego Creek to commemorate the Nation's birthday. The
temporary safety zone created by this rule is necessary to ensure the
safety of vessels and spectators from hazards associated with the
fireworks display. Such hazards include obstructions to the waterway
that may cause death, serious bodily harm, or property damage.
Establishing a safety zone to control vessel movement around the
location of the launch area will help ensure the safety of persons and
property in the vicinity of this event and help minimize the associated
risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the setup, loading, and launching of the
Belhaven Fourth of July Fireworks Display. The fireworks display will
occur from approximately 8:45 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on July 4, 2011.
The safety zone will encompass all waters on the Pantego Creek
within a 600 foot radius of the launch site on land at position
35[deg]32'35'' N, 076[deg]37'46'' W from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on July
4, 2011. All geographic coordinates are North American Datum 1983 (NAD
83). The effect of this temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the regulated area during the fireworks display.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene patrol
personnel. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector North
Carolina or his designated representative. The Captain of the Port or
his designated representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Notification of the temporary safety zone will be provided to the
public via marine information broadcasts.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because that it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of
any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or
policy issues. The safety zone around the launch area will be
relatively small and exist for only a minimal time. Thus, restrictions
on vessel movement within any particular area of the Pantego Creek are
expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may
still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain on
the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in this portion of the Pantego Creek between 8:45
p.m. and 9:45 p.m. on July 4, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because: (i) Vessels may transit
around the event zone with permission from the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander; (ii) the zone is of limited size and duration; (iii) in the
event a vessel deems it necessary to transit through the zone during
the enforcement period, the COTP may afford the vessel the opportunity
to do so upon request. The Coast Guard will give notice to the public
via a Local Notice to Mariners that the regulation is in effect in
order to allow mariners to make alternate plans for transiting the
affected area.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the
[[Page 37269]]
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-0473 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0473 Safety Zone, Pantego Creek; Belhaven, NC
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina. Representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: This safety zone
will encompass all waters on the Pantego Creek within a 600 foot radius
of the launch site on land at position 35[deg]32'35'' N,
076[deg]37'46'' W. All geographic coordinates are North American Datum
1983 (NAD 83).
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in Sec.
165.23 of this part apply to the area described in paragraph (b) of
this section.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through any
portion of the safety zone must first request authorization from the
Captain of the Port, or a designated representative, unless the Captain
of the Port previously announced via Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on
VHF Marine Band Radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz) that this regulation will
not be enforced in that portion of the safety zone. The Captain of the
Port can be contacted at telephone number (910) 343-3882 or by radio on
VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13 and 16.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2011 unless cancelled earlier by the Captain of
the Port.
Dated: June 7, 2011.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011-15972 Filed 6-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P