Special Local Regulation for Marine Events; Temporary Change of Dates for Recurring Marine Events in the Fifth Coast Guard District, John H. Kerr Reservoir, Clarksville VA, 37293-37296 [2011-15971]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules
rule, call or e-mail. If you have
questions on this temporary rule, call or
e-mail LCDR Christopher O’Neal,
Waterways Management Division Chief,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone 757–668–5581, e-mail
Christopher.A.ONeal@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0545]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation for Marine
Events; Temporary Change of Dates
for Recurring Marine Events in the
Fifth Coast Guard District, John H.
Kerr Reservoir, Clarksville VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily change the enforcement
period of special local regulations for
one recurring marine event in the Fifth
Coast Guard District, specifically, the
‘‘Clarksville Hydroplane Challenge,’’
hydroplane races on the waters of the
John H. Kerr Reservoir. Because this
event will consist of approximately 80
hydroplane powerboats conducting
high-speed competitive races in heats
counter-clockwise around an oval
racecourse on the water of the John H.
Kerr Reservoir, this regulation is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the John H. Kerr
Reservoir in Clarksville, Virginia during
the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 27, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0545 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 Jun 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0545),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0545’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8c by 11
inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37293
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0545’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation, West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meeting, contact LCDR
Christopher O’Neal at the telephone
number or e-mail address indicated
under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this notice.
Basis and Purpose
Marine events are frequently held on
the navigable waters within the
boundary of Fifth Coast Guard District.
The water activities that typically
comprise marine events include sailing
regattas, power boat races, swim races
and holiday parades. For a description
of the geographical area of each Coast
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
37294
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Guard Sector—Captain of the Port Zone,
please see 33 CFR 3.25.
This regulation proposes to
temporarily change the enforcement
period of special local regulations for
one recurring marine event within Fifth
Coast Guard District. This proposed
regulation applies to one marine event
in 33 CFR 100.501, Table to § 100.501.
On September 24 and 25, 2011, the
Cambridge Power Boat Racing
Association will sponsor the
‘‘Clarksville Hydroplane Challenge’’
hydroplane races on the waters of the
John H. Kerr Reservoir. The regulation
at 33 CFR 100.501 is effective annually
for this hydroplane boat race marine
event. The event will consist of
approximately 80 hydroplane
powerboats conducting high-speed
competitive races in heats counterclockwise around an oval racecourse on
the water of the John H. Kerr Reservoir
adjacent to Occoneechee State Park,
Clarksville, Virginia and State Route 15
Highway Bridge. A fleet of spectator
vessels is expected to gather near the
event site to view the competition. To
provide for the safety of participants,
spectators, support and transiting
vessels, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
event area during the hydroplane races.
The regulation at 33 CFR 100.501 would
be enforced for the duration of the
event. Under the provisions of 33 CFR
100.501, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on
September 24 and 25, 2011, vessels may
not enter the regulated area unless they
receive permission from the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary special local regulation on
specified waters of John H. Kerr
Reservoir, in Clarksville, Virginia. The
regulated area will be established in the
interest of public safety during the
‘‘Clarksville Hydroplane Challenge’’,
and will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 6
p.m. on September 24 and 25, 2011. The
Coast Guard, at its discretion, when
practical will allow the passage of
vessels when races are not taking place.
Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his Representative, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the regulated
area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 Jun 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. Although this rule
prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of certain waterways during specified
times, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant due to the limited
duration that the regulated area will be
in effect and the extensive advance
notifications that will be made to the
maritime community via marine
information broadcasts, local radio
stations and area newspapers so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. Additionally, this
rulemaking does not change the
permanent regulated areas that have
been published in 33 CFR 100.501,
Table to § 100.501. In some cases vessel
traffic may be able to transit the
regulated area when the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander deems it is safe to do
so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
this section of the John H. Kerr
Reservoir during the event.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ADDRESSES)
explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
This regulation will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because: (i) It
will be enforced only for a short period
of time on two consecutive days; (ii)
vessels may be granted the opportunity
to transit the safety zone during the
period of enforcement if the Patrol
Commander deems it safe to do so; (iii)
vessels may transit around the safety
zone; and (iv) before the enforcement
period, the Coast Guard will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR
Christopher O’Neal. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
37295
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Technical Standards
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction.
This rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR part 100 that
apply to organized marine events on the
navigable waters of the United States
that may have potential for negative
impact on the safety or other interest of
waterway users and shore side activities
in the event area. The category of water
activities includes but is not limited to
sail boat regattas, boat parades, power
boat racing, swimming events, crew
racing, and sail board racing. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. In § 100.501, suspend line No. 47
in the Table to § 100.501.
3. In § 100.501, on September 24 and
25, 2011, add line No. 62 in Table to
§ 100.501; to be enforced from 9 a.m. to
6 p.m. on September 24, 2011 and from
9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on September 25, 2011,
to read as follows:
§ 100.501 Special Local Regulations;
Marine Events in the Fifth Coast Guard
District.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE TO § 100.501–ALL COORDINATES LISTED IN THE TABLE TO § 100.501 REFERENCE DATUM NAD 1983
Number
Date
*
Event
Sponsor
*
*
Location
*
*
*
*
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads—COTP Zone
62 .........
September 24
and 25, 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 Jun 24, 2011
Clarksville Hydroplane Challenge.
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Cambridge Power
Boat Racing
Assoc.
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
The waters of the John H. Kerr Reservoir, adjacent to the State Route
15 Highway Bridge and Occoneechee State Park, Clarksville, Virginia,
from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on the south by a line running
northeasterly from a point along the shoreline at latitude 36°37′14″ N,
longitude 078°32′46.5″ W, thence to latitude 36°37′39.2″ N, longitude
078°32′08.8″ W, and bounded on the north by the State Route 15
Highway Bridge.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
37296
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
Dated: June 16, 2011.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2011–15971 Filed 6–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
37 CFR Parts 1 and 41
[PTO–C–2010–0019]
RIN 0651–AC44
Revision of Patent Fees for Fiscal Year
2012
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (Office) is proposing
to adjust certain patent fee amounts for
fiscal year 2012 to reflect fluctuations in
the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The
patent statute provides for the annual
CPI adjustment of patent fees set by
statute to recover the higher costs
associated with doing business.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 27, 2011. No
public hearing will be held.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN number RIN 0651–
AC44, by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail:
Walter.Schlueter@uspto.gov. Include
RIN number RIN 0651–AC44 in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: (571) 273–6299, marked to the
attention of Walter Schlueter.
• Mail: Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450,
marked to the attention of Walter
Schlueter.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
for this proposed rule making. For
additional information on the rule
making process, see the heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Walter Schlueter by e-mail at
Walter.Schlueter@uspto.gov, by
telephone at (571) 272–6299, or by fax
at (571) 273–6299.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 Jun 24, 2011
The
USPTO is proposing to adjust certain
patent fees in accordance with the
applicable provisions of title 35, United
States Code, as amended by the
Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub.
L. 108–447, 118 Stat. 2809 (2004)).
Background: Statutory Provisions:
Patent fees are set by or under the
authority provided in 35 U.S.C. 41, 119,
120, 132(b), 156, 157(a), 255, 302, 311,
376, section 532(a)(2) of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act (URAA) (Pub. L.
103–465, § 532(a)(2), 108 Stat. 4809,
4985 (1994)), and section 4506 of the
American Inventors Protection Act of
1999 (AIPA) (Pub. L. 106–113, 113 Stat.
1501, 1501A–565 (1999)). For fees paid
under 35 U.S.C. 41(a) and (b) and
132(b), independent inventors, small
business concerns, and nonprofit
organizations who meet the
requirements of 35 U.S.C. 41(h)(1) are
entitled to a fifty-percent reduction.
Section 41(f) of title 35, United States
Code, provides that fees established
under 35 U.S.C. 41(a) and (b) may be
adjusted on October 1, 1992, and every
year thereafter, to reflect fluctuations in
the CPI over the previous twelve
months.
Section 41(g) of title 35, United States
Code, provides that new fee amounts
established by the Director under 35
U.S.C. 41 may take effect thirty days
after notice in the Federal Register and
the Official Gazette of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
The fiscal year 2005 Consolidated
Appropriations Act (section 801 of
Division B) provided that 35 U.S.C.
41(a), (b), and (d) shall be administered
in a manner that revises patent
application fees (35 U.S.C. 41(a)) and
patent maintenance fees (35 U.S.C.
41(b)), and provides for a separate filing
fee (35 U.S.C. 41(a)), search fee (35
U.S.C. 41(d)(1)), and examination fee
(35 U.S.C. 41(a)(3)) during fiscal years
2005 and 2006. See Pub. L. 108–447,
118 Stat. 2809, 2924–30 (2004). The
patent and trademark fee provisions of
the fiscal year 2005 Consolidated
Appropriations Act have been extended
through September 30, 2011, via the
Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009. See
Pub. L. 112–4, 125 Stat. 6 (2011); Pub.
L. 111–322, 124 Stat. 3518 (2010); Pub.
L. 111–317, 124 Stat. 3454 (2010); Pub.
L. 111–290, 124 Stat. 3063 (2010); Pub.
L. 111–242, 124 Stat. 2607 (2010); Pub.
L. 111–224, 124 Stat. 2385 (2010); Pub.
L. 111–117, 123 Stat. 3034 (2009); Pub.
L. 111–8, 123 Stat. 524 (2009); Pub. L.
111–6, 123 Stat. 522 (2009); Pub. L.
111–5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009); Pub. L.
110–329, 122 Stat. 3574 (2008); Pub. L.
110–161, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007); Pub. L.
110–149, 121 Stat. 1819 (2007); Pub. L.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
110–137, 121 Stat. 1454 (2007); Pub. L.
110–116, 121 Stat. 1295 (2007); Pub. L.
110–92, 121 Stat. 989 (2007); Pub. L.
110–5, 121 Stat. 8 (2007); Pub. L. 109–
383, 120 Stat. 2678 (2006); Pub. L. 109–
369, 120 Stat. 2642 (2006); and Pub. L.
109–289, 120 Stat. 1257 (2006). The
USPTO anticipates the enactment of
legislation that would extend the patent
and trademark fee provisions of the
fiscal year 2005 Consolidated
Appropriations Act through fiscal year
2012.
Fee Adjustment Level: The patent
statutory fees established by 35 U.S.C.
41(a) and (b) are proposed to be adjusted
to reflect the most recent fluctuations
occurring during the twelve-month
period prior to publication of the final
rule, as measured by the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI–U).
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has advised that in calculating
these fluctuations, the USPTO should
use CPI–U data as determined by the
Secretary of Labor.
In accordance with previous feesetting methodology, the USPTO
proposes to adjust patent statutory fee
amounts based on the most recent
annual increase in the CPI–U, as
reported by the Secretary of Labor, at
the time the final rule is implemented.
Proposed adjusted fee amounts are not
included in this proposed rule in order
to avoid confusion that could arise from
using projected increases in the
proposed rule that may not end up
matching actual increases at the time of
the final rule. Annual increases to the
CPI–U are published monthly, and
before the final fee amounts are
published, the fee amounts may be
adjusted based on actual fluctuations in
the CPI–U. Adjusted patent statutory fee
amounts based on the most recent
annual increase in the CPI–U, as
reported by the Secretary of Labor, will
be published in a final rules notice.
The fee amounts will be rounded by
applying standard arithmetic rules so
that the amounts rounded will be
convenient to the user. Fees for other
than a small entity of $100 or more will
be rounded to the nearest $10. Fees of
less than $100 will be rounded to an
even number so that any comparable
small entity fee will be a whole number.
General Procedures: Any fee amount
that is paid on or after the effective date
of the proposed fee adjustment would
be subject to the new fees then in effect.
The amount of the fee to be paid will
be determined by the time of filing. The
time of filing will be determined either
according to the date of receipt in the
Office (37 CFR 1.6) or the date reflected
on a proper Certificate of Mailing or
E:\FR\FM\27JNP1.SGM
27JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 123 (Monday, June 27, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37293-37296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15971]
[[Page 37293]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0545]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation for Marine Events; Temporary Change of
Dates for Recurring Marine Events in the Fifth Coast Guard District,
John H. Kerr Reservoir, Clarksville VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to temporarily change the enforcement
period of special local regulations for one recurring marine event in
the Fifth Coast Guard District, specifically, the ``Clarksville
Hydroplane Challenge,'' hydroplane races on the waters of the John H.
Kerr Reservoir. Because this event will consist of approximately 80
hydroplane powerboats conducting high-speed competitive races in heats
counter-clockwise around an oval racecourse on the water of the John H.
Kerr Reservoir, this regulation is necessary to provide for the safety
of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is intended
to restrict vessel traffic in portions of the John H. Kerr Reservoir in
Clarksville, Virginia during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 27, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0545 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail. If you have questions on this temporary rule,
call or e-mail LCDR Christopher O'Neal, Waterways Management Division
Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-5581, e-
mail Christopher.A.ONeal@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0545), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0545'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8[frac12] by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0545'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation, West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact LCDR Christopher O'Neal at the telephone number or e-mail
address indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
Basis and Purpose
Marine events are frequently held on the navigable waters within
the boundary of Fifth Coast Guard District. The water activities that
typically comprise marine events include sailing regattas, power boat
races, swim races and holiday parades. For a description of the
geographical area of each Coast
[[Page 37294]]
Guard Sector--Captain of the Port Zone, please see 33 CFR 3.25.
This regulation proposes to temporarily change the enforcement
period of special local regulations for one recurring marine event
within Fifth Coast Guard District. This proposed regulation applies to
one marine event in 33 CFR 100.501, Table to Sec. 100.501.
On September 24 and 25, 2011, the Cambridge Power Boat Racing
Association will sponsor the ``Clarksville Hydroplane Challenge''
hydroplane races on the waters of the John H. Kerr Reservoir. The
regulation at 33 CFR 100.501 is effective annually for this hydroplane
boat race marine event. The event will consist of approximately 80
hydroplane powerboats conducting high-speed competitive races in heats
counter-clockwise around an oval racecourse on the water of the John H.
Kerr Reservoir adjacent to Occoneechee State Park, Clarksville,
Virginia and State Route 15 Highway Bridge. A fleet of spectator
vessels is expected to gather near the event site to view the
competition. To provide for the safety of participants, spectators,
support and transiting vessels, the Coast Guard will temporarily
restrict vessel traffic in the event area during the hydroplane races.
The regulation at 33 CFR 100.501 would be enforced for the duration of
the event. Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.501, from 9 a.m. to 6
p.m. on September 24 and 25, 2011, vessels may not enter the regulated
area unless they receive permission from the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation on specified waters of John H. Kerr Reservoir, in
Clarksville, Virginia. The regulated area will be established in the
interest of public safety during the ``Clarksville Hydroplane
Challenge'', and will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on September 24
and 25, 2011. The Coast Guard, at its discretion, when practical will
allow the passage of vessels when races are not taking place. Except
for participants and vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his Representative, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under that those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Although this
rule prevents traffic from transiting a portion of certain waterways
during specified times, the effect of this regulation will not be
significant due to the limited duration that the regulated area will be
in effect and the extensive advance notifications that will be made to
the maritime community via marine information broadcasts, local radio
stations and area newspapers so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. Additionally, this rulemaking does not change the
permanent regulated areas that have been published in 33 CFR 100.501,
Table to Sec. 100.501. In some cases vessel traffic may be able to
transit the regulated area when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems
it is safe to do so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit this section of the John H.
Kerr Reservoir during the event.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it. This regulation will not
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities
because: (i) It will be enforced only for a short period of time on two
consecutive days; (ii) vessels may be granted the opportunity to
transit the safety zone during the period of enforcement if the Patrol
Commander deems it safe to do so; (iii) vessels may transit around the
safety zone; and (iv) before the enforcement period, the Coast Guard
will issue maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LCDR Christopher O'Neal. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the
[[Page 37295]]
effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction. This
rule involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR part 100 that
apply to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United
States that may have potential for negative impact on the safety or
other interest of waterway users and shore side activities in the event
area. The category of water activities includes but is not limited to
sail boat regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events,
crew racing, and sail board racing. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. In Sec. 100.501, suspend line No. 47 in the Table to Sec.
100.501.
3. In Sec. 100.501, on September 24 and 25, 2011, add line No. 62
in Table to Sec. 100.501; to be enforced from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on
September 24, 2011 and from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on September 25, 2011, to
read as follows:
Sec. 100.501 Special Local Regulations; Marine Events in the Fifth
Coast Guard District.
* * * * *
Table To Sec. 100.501-All Coordinates Listed in the Table to Sec. 100.501 Reference Datum NAD 1983
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Date Event Sponsor Location
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads--COTP Zone
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
62................................. September 24 and 25, Clarksville Cambridge Power Boat The waters of the John H. Kerr Reservoir,
2011. Hydroplane Challenge. Racing Assoc. adjacent to the State Route 15 Highway Bridge
and Occoneechee State Park, Clarksville,
Virginia, from shoreline to shoreline,
bounded on the south by a line running
northeasterly from a point along the
shoreline at latitude 36[deg]37'14'' N,
longitude 078[deg]32'46.5'' W, thence to
latitude 36[deg]37'39.2'' N, longitude
078[deg]32'08.8'' W, and bounded on the north
by the State Route 15 Highway Bridge.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 37296]]
* * * * *
Dated: June 16, 2011.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2011-15971 Filed 6-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P