Siuslaw National Forest; Oregon; Oregon Dunes NRA Management Area 10 (C) Route and Area Designation, 37059-37061 [2011-15917]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Form FNS–339,
Federal-State Supplemental Nutrition
Program(s) Agreement
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
proposed information collections. The
proposed information collection is a
revision to a currently approved
collection of information relating to the
reporting and recordkeeping burden
associated with completing and
submitting form FNS–339, the Federal
and State Agreement for the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for
Women, Infants and Children (WIC); the
WIC Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program
(FMNP); and/or the Senior Farmers’
Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP).
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received on or before August
23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments may be sent to: Debra
Whitford, Director, Supplemental Food
Programs Division, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 520,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via email to WICHQSFPD@fns.usda.gov. Be sure to include
the title of the Notice in the subject line
of the message. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia
22302, Room 518. All responses to this
Notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval, and will become a matter of
public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
form and instructions should be
directed to: Joan Carroll, (703) 305–
2746.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Federal-State Supplemental
Nutrition Program(s) Agreement.
OMB Number: 0584–0332.
Form Number: FNS–339.
Expiration Date: November 30, 2012.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Healthy, Hunger-Free
Kids Act of 2010 (the Act), Public Law
111–296, was enacted by the President
on December 13, 2010. Section 361 of
the Act requires that the Secretary of
Agriculture incorporate in the FederalState Agreement (form FNS–339) a
provision for the WIC Program and
FMNP that supports full use of Federal
funds and excludes such funds from
State budget restrictions or limitations
including, at a minimum, hiring freezes,
work furloughs, and travel restrictions
affecting the WIC Program or the FMNP.
Additional technical amendments are
also being made to the FNS–339, as
follows: (1) The title is changed to
include FMNP and SFMNP; (2) coverage
by statutes as well as regulations is
added; (3) references to FMNP and
SFMNP are added as necessary and
appropriate; and (4) several
typographical errors are corrected.
The agreement requires the signature
of the Chief State agency official and
includes a certification/assurance
regarding drug free workplace, a
certification regarding lobbying and a
disclosure of lobbying activities. The
signed agreement is the contract
between USDA and each State agency
that administers WIC, FMNP and
SFMNP, thereby authorizing USDA to
release funds to the State agencies for
the administration of the Program(s) in
the jurisdiction of the State in
accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR
parts 246, 248, and/or 249.
This revision does not increase the
burden per response. However, the
number of respondents (agencies
administering WIC, FMNP and SFMNP)
increased from 140 to 142 increasing the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37059
total annual burden from 35 to 35.5
hours.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.25 hours per
response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information.
Affected Public: State, Territorial and
Tribal Agencies: Respondent Type: The
Chief Health Officer of the WIC State
agency, or the Chief Agency Official of
the FMNP or SFMNP State agency (e.g.,
a State Commissioner of Agriculture or
Agency on Aging), if not administered
by the WIC State agency in that state.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
142 respondents.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: One.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 35.5 hours.
Dated: June 15, 2011.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–15873 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Siuslaw National Forest; Oregon;
Oregon Dunes NRA Management Area
10 (C) Route and Area Designation
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to amend the 1990
Siuslaw National Forest Land and
Resources Management Plan (as
amended by the 1994 Oregon Dunes
Plan) in order to:
(1) Designate Off Highway Vehicle
(OHV), also called Off Road Vehicle
(ORV) routes within Management Area
(MA) 10 (C) of the Oregon Dunes
National Recreation Area (ODNRA)
beyond the three year timeframe
identified in the Plan;
(2) modify the boundaries of some
areas currently zoned MA 10 (C) to MA
10 (B), in order to meet the management
objectives of MA 10 (B); and
(3) designate the Banshee Hill route as
a site specific exception within the 10
(C) Management Area.
Management Area 10 (C) requires that
OHVs be operated only on designated
routes, while Management Area 10 (B)
allows OHVs to be operated anywhere
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
37060
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
within the area. This document is being
prepared under the following authority:
40 CFR 1501.7 and 40 CFR 1508.22.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by 30
days from date of publication in the
Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected December 2011 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected May 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Siuslaw National Forest, 855 Highway
101, Reedsport, OR 97467 Attention:
Angie Morris, Team Lead. Comments
may also be sent via e-mail to
comments-pacificnorthwest-siuslawcentralcoast@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to
541–271–6034.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angie Morris, Recreation Planner, (541)
271–6040.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1994,
the Oregon Dunes Plan amended
Siuslaw National Forest Plan direction
for the Oregon Dunes National
Recreation Area (ODNRA). The Plan
allocated eleven Management Areas
(MAs) within the ODNRA. One of the
allocations is MA 10 (C), wherein ORVs
are Restricted to Designated Routes. The
Plan specifies that MA 10 (C) be
managed to ‘‘protect vegetated habitats
while providing controlled
opportunities for Off Road Vehicles
(ORV) touring and traveling on
designated routes.’’ The Plan further
states that the goal for this management
area is ‘‘to minimize ORV impacts on
vegetated areas while allowing
controlled opportunities for riding and
travel through the area on designated
routes for access to the beach and other
areas which are open for ORV use.’’
Approximately 4,445 acres are currently
designated MA 10 (C).
With few exceptions, the routes
originally designated with Plan
approval and those designated prior to
1997 have remained the only officially
designated routes in MA 10 (C). The
incompleteness of the existing route
system plus the lack of adequate signing
and formal closure orders for most areas
allocated MA 10 (C) permitted and, to
a degree, encouraged the continued use
of undesignated routes and the
establishment of additional userdeveloped routes. As a result, the
majority of existing routes traveled by
OHVs within MA 10 (C) today are not
designated routes. This has in turn led
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
to greater and unnecessary impacts to
important plant communities within the
MA 10 (C) areas. The current effort is
aimed at providing adequate OHV
access and reasonable, enjoyable
connections between valued riding
areas while minimizing impacts to
adjacent and intervening plant
communities and habitat areas.
open sand to vegetation, the existence of
designated dispersed sand camps, and
the predominance of non-native,
invasive vegetation (i.e. Scotch broom
and/or European beachgrass) over native
non-invasive species. Non-native,
invasive species, such as Scotch broom
and European beachgrass do not need to
be protected from impacts by OHVs.
Purpose and Need for Action
The primary purpose and need for the
project is to complete the designation
and development of a comprehensive,
understandable designated OHV route
system within MA 10 (C) areas of the
ODNRA as foreseen and directed by the
Oregon Dunes Plan. Designation of
additional routes to enhance alreadyexisting designated routes and create a
comprehensive, understandable system,
coupled with enhanced route signing,
subsequent rider education,
unauthorized route closure under
provisions at 36 CFR part 212, and
strong enforcement:
→ Will simplify and facilitate OHV
rider access through various parts of MA
10 (C) areas that are currently difficult
to understand and navigate on the
ground;
→ Will thereby encourage user
acceptance of and compliance with
designated route requirements in MA
10 (C) areas;
→ Will discourage use of
unauthorized user-developed routes
allowing them, in turn, to be
rehabilitated or to revert naturally to a
more natural condition;
→ Will simplify OHV management
within MA 10 (C), allowing agency
personnel to focus more on visitor
education, resource restoration and
strong enforcement against those who
would persist in using unauthorized
routes.
A secondary purpose and need for the
project is to correct OHV management
inconsistencies arising from minor
mapping errors between 10 (C) and
10 (B) that date back to the original
aerial photo interpretation and
vegetation typing done for the 1994
Dunes Plan. Some small areas totaling
about 287 acres out of a total of about
10,400 acres allocated for OHV use were
erroneously allocated to MA 10 (C). In
actuality, they were subsequently found
on the ground to better meet the
appearance, conditions and
management objectives of MA 10 (B).
Managing areas differently that appear
the same on the ground, but are
allocated as different management areas
is problematic for visitor understanding,
education efforts and enforcement. The
criteria for changing areas from MA 10
(C) to MA 10 (B) include the ratio of
Proposed Action
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Within the Oregon Dunes National
Recreation Area MA 10 (C), the Siuslaw
National Forest proposes a nonsignificant Plan amendment to designate
an additional ten routes open to
motorized vehicles totalling
approximately 3.96 miles. Nine of the
ten proposed routes already exist on the
ground as historic, user-developed
routes and will involve no new
construction or ground disturbance. One
new route of approximately 0.62 miles
would be constructed to replace a
currently designated route that would
be closed because it is impassible due
to high water most of the year. Under
provisions at 36 CFR part 212, existing
user-developed routes not designated
under this action would by definition be
closed to future motorized use and
would be obliterated or allowed to
naturally revert. Approximately 103
miles of unathorized user-developed
routes would be closed and eventually
naturalized by this action. The project
would also modify Management Area
boundaries, changing approximately
287 acres, encompassing about 32 miles
of user-created routes, from MA 10 (C)
to MA 10 (B) in order to meet the
management objectives of MA 10 (B).
This action results in no net gain or loss
of acres managed for OHV use and does
not affect any other management areas.
Finally, the route commonly known as
Banshee Hill in the Umpqua Dunes
riding area will be designated. It will be
a site specific exception to the criteria
otherwise used for designating routes
within the 10C area because it does not
connect otherwise unconnected riding
areas and it does not serve all vehicle
classes, being restricted by steepness
and width to Class 1 (quads) and Class
3 (motorcycles) vehicles. Prior decisions
such as those made in the Plan to
allocate large blocks of land as open or
closed to motorized use, areas managed
for habitat protection, etc. will not be
revisited.
In summary, the proposed action
amends the Dunes Management Plan to:
(1) Designate an additional 3.96 miles
of OHV routes within the 10 (C) area
beyond the 3 year standard and
guideline timeframe identified in the
Plan;
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
(2) modify some Management Area
boundaries, changing 287 acres from
MA 10 (C) to MA 10 (B);
(3) designate the route known as
Banshee Hill as a site specific exception
within Management Area 10 (C).
Possible Alternatives
The EIS will consider the following
alternatives:
(1) A ‘‘No Action/No Change’’
Alternative, that would not designate
additional routes or reallocate MA 10
(C) areas to MA 10 (B);
(2) The proposed action;
(3) Alternatives to the proposed action
that are within the scope of the project,
meet the purpose and need, are
responsive to the comments received
during the scoping period and are
approved by the Forest Supervisor for
consideration.
Responsible Official
The responsible official will be the
Forest Supervisor of the Siuslaw
National Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made falls within
the broad framework of the existing
Forest Plan. The Forest Supervisor of
the Siuslaw National Forest will decide
whether to implement the action as
proposed, whether to take no action at
this time, or whether to implement any
alternatives that are proposed. Proposed
actions are believed to constitute nonsignificant amendments of the Forest
Plan and are narrow in scope, dealing
only with off highway vehicle riding
areas (MAs 10 (C) and 10 (B)) at the
Oregon Dunes NRA, an area comprising
approximately 2% of the entire Siuslaw
National Forest.
Preliminary Issues
(1) Designation of OHV routes in MA
10 (C) may cause adverse effects to
natural resources, nearby residents and/
or other recreational users of the 10 (C)
area.
(2) Minor modifications of MA 10 (C)
to MA 10 (B) and associated changes in
OHV use of the area may cause adverse
effects to natural resources, nearby
residents and/or other recreation users
of motorized use areas.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Public comments
about this proposal are requested in
order to assist in identifying issues,
determine how to best manage the
resources, and to focus the analysis.
Comments received to this notice,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
including names and addresses of those
who comment, will be considered part
of the public record on this proposed
action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit
anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent
decision under 36 CFR part 215.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d),
any person may request the agency to
withhold a submission from the public
record by showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that,
under FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the agency’s decision
regarding the request for confidentiality,
and where the request is denied the
agency will return the submission and
notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without
name and address within a specified
number of days.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions
[Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)].
Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft EIS stage but
that are not raised until after completion
of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon
v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that comments and
objections are made available to the
Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits
of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37061
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
A draft EIS will be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and available for public review by
December 2011. The EPA will publish a
Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft
EIS in the Federal Register. The
comment period on the draft EIS will be
45 days from the date the EPA publishes
the notice of availability in the Federal
Register. The final EIS is scheduled to
be available Summer 2012.
Dated: June 8, 2011.
Katherine Harbick,
Acting Siuslaw National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011–15917 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE; P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Lolo and Kootenai National Forests’
Sanders County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Sanders County
Resource Advisory Committee Meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393) the Lolo and Kootenai National
Forests’ Sanders County Resource
Advisory Committee will meet on July
21, 2011 at 7 p.m. and on August 11,
2011 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls,
Montana for business meetings. These
meetings are open to the public. The
committee will meet on June 18, 2011
in Thompson Falls, Montana for a field
trip to project sites. This trip is open to
the public.
DATES: June 18, 2011; July 21, 2011;
August 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111
Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT
59873.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randy Hojem, Designated Federal
Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains
Ranger District, Lolo National Forest at
(406) 826–3821.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The June
18, 2011 meeting will include a field
trip to project sites. The July 21, 2011
meeting agenda will include an
overview of all 2011 project proposal
submissions. The August 11, 2011
meeting will be a voting meeting where
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37059-37061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15917]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Siuslaw National Forest; Oregon; Oregon Dunes NRA Management Area
10 (C) Route and Area Designation
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to amend the 1990 Siuslaw National Forest Land and
Resources Management Plan (as amended by the 1994 Oregon Dunes Plan) in
order to:
(1) Designate Off Highway Vehicle (OHV), also called Off Road
Vehicle (ORV) routes within Management Area (MA) 10 (C) of the Oregon
Dunes National Recreation Area (ODNRA) beyond the three year timeframe
identified in the Plan;
(2) modify the boundaries of some areas currently zoned MA 10 (C)
to MA 10 (B), in order to meet the management objectives of MA 10 (B);
and
(3) designate the Banshee Hill route as a site specific exception
within the 10 (C) Management Area.
Management Area 10 (C) requires that OHVs be operated only on
designated routes, while Management Area 10 (B) allows OHVs to be
operated anywhere
[[Page 37060]]
within the area. This document is being prepared under the following
authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 40 CFR 1508.22.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is expected December 2011 and the final
environmental impact statement is expected May 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Siuslaw National Forest, 855
Highway 101, Reedsport, OR 97467 Attention: Angie Morris, Team Lead.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to comments-pacificnorthwest-siuslaw-centralcoast@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to 541-271-6034.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angie Morris, Recreation Planner,
(541) 271-6040.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1994, the Oregon Dunes Plan amended
Siuslaw National Forest Plan direction for the Oregon Dunes National
Recreation Area (ODNRA). The Plan allocated eleven Management Areas
(MAs) within the ODNRA. One of the allocations is MA 10 (C), wherein
ORVs are Restricted to Designated Routes. The Plan specifies that MA 10
(C) be managed to ``protect vegetated habitats while providing
controlled opportunities for Off Road Vehicles (ORV) touring and
traveling on designated routes.'' The Plan further states that the goal
for this management area is ``to minimize ORV impacts on vegetated
areas while allowing controlled opportunities for riding and travel
through the area on designated routes for access to the beach and other
areas which are open for ORV use.'' Approximately 4,445 acres are
currently designated MA 10 (C).
With few exceptions, the routes originally designated with Plan
approval and those designated prior to 1997 have remained the only
officially designated routes in MA 10 (C). The incompleteness of the
existing route system plus the lack of adequate signing and formal
closure orders for most areas allocated MA 10 (C) permitted and, to a
degree, encouraged the continued use of undesignated routes and the
establishment of additional user-developed routes. As a result, the
majority of existing routes traveled by OHVs within MA 10 (C) today are
not designated routes. This has in turn led to greater and unnecessary
impacts to important plant communities within the MA 10 (C) areas. The
current effort is aimed at providing adequate OHV access and
reasonable, enjoyable connections between valued riding areas while
minimizing impacts to adjacent and intervening plant communities and
habitat areas.
Purpose and Need for Action
The primary purpose and need for the project is to complete the
designation and development of a comprehensive, understandable
designated OHV route system within MA 10 (C) areas of the ODNRA as
foreseen and directed by the Oregon Dunes Plan. Designation of
additional routes to enhance already-existing designated routes and
create a comprehensive, understandable system, coupled with enhanced
route signing, subsequent rider education, unauthorized route closure
under provisions at 36 CFR part 212, and strong enforcement:
[rtarr] Will simplify and facilitate OHV rider access through
various parts of MA 10 (C) areas that are currently difficult to
understand and navigate on the ground;
[rtarr] Will thereby encourage user acceptance of and compliance
with designated route requirements in MA 10 (C) areas;
[rtarr] Will discourage use of unauthorized user-developed routes
allowing them, in turn, to be rehabilitated or to revert naturally to a
more natural condition;
[rtarr] Will simplify OHV management within MA 10 (C), allowing
agency personnel to focus more on visitor education, resource
restoration and strong enforcement against those who would persist in
using unauthorized routes.
A secondary purpose and need for the project is to correct OHV
management inconsistencies arising from minor mapping errors between 10
(C) and 10 (B) that date back to the original aerial photo
interpretation and vegetation typing done for the 1994 Dunes Plan. Some
small areas totaling about 287 acres out of a total of about 10,400
acres allocated for OHV use were erroneously allocated to MA 10 (C). In
actuality, they were subsequently found on the ground to better meet
the appearance, conditions and management objectives of MA 10 (B).
Managing areas differently that appear the same on the ground, but are
allocated as different management areas is problematic for visitor
understanding, education efforts and enforcement. The criteria for
changing areas from MA 10 (C) to MA 10 (B) include the ratio of open
sand to vegetation, the existence of designated dispersed sand camps,
and the predominance of non-native, invasive vegetation (i.e. Scotch
broom and/or European beachgrass) over native non-invasive species.
Non-native, invasive species, such as Scotch broom and European
beachgrass do not need to be protected from impacts by OHVs.
Proposed Action
Within the Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area MA 10 (C), the
Siuslaw National Forest proposes a non-significant Plan amendment to
designate an additional ten routes open to motorized vehicles totalling
approximately 3.96 miles. Nine of the ten proposed routes already exist
on the ground as historic, user-developed routes and will involve no
new construction or ground disturbance. One new route of approximately
0.62 miles would be constructed to replace a currently designated route
that would be closed because it is impassible due to high water most of
the year. Under provisions at 36 CFR part 212, existing user-developed
routes not designated under this action would by definition be closed
to future motorized use and would be obliterated or allowed to
naturally revert. Approximately 103 miles of unathorized user-developed
routes would be closed and eventually naturalized by this action. The
project would also modify Management Area boundaries, changing
approximately 287 acres, encompassing about 32 miles of user-created
routes, from MA 10 (C) to MA 10 (B) in order to meet the management
objectives of MA 10 (B). This action results in no net gain or loss of
acres managed for OHV use and does not affect any other management
areas. Finally, the route commonly known as Banshee Hill in the Umpqua
Dunes riding area will be designated. It will be a site specific
exception to the criteria otherwise used for designating routes within
the 10C area because it does not connect otherwise unconnected riding
areas and it does not serve all vehicle classes, being restricted by
steepness and width to Class 1 (quads) and Class 3 (motorcycles)
vehicles. Prior decisions such as those made in the Plan to allocate
large blocks of land as open or closed to motorized use, areas managed
for habitat protection, etc. will not be revisited.
In summary, the proposed action amends the Dunes Management Plan
to:
(1) Designate an additional 3.96 miles of OHV routes within the 10
(C) area beyond the 3 year standard and guideline timeframe identified
in the Plan;
[[Page 37061]]
(2) modify some Management Area boundaries, changing 287 acres from
MA 10 (C) to MA 10 (B);
(3) designate the route known as Banshee Hill as a site specific
exception within Management Area 10 (C).
Possible Alternatives
The EIS will consider the following alternatives:
(1) A ``No Action/No Change'' Alternative, that would not designate
additional routes or reallocate MA 10 (C) areas to MA 10 (B);
(2) The proposed action;
(3) Alternatives to the proposed action that are within the scope
of the project, meet the purpose and need, are responsive to the
comments received during the scoping period and are approved by the
Forest Supervisor for consideration.
Responsible Official
The responsible official will be the Forest Supervisor of the
Siuslaw National Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made falls within the broad framework of the
existing Forest Plan. The Forest Supervisor of the Siuslaw National
Forest will decide whether to implement the action as proposed, whether
to take no action at this time, or whether to implement any
alternatives that are proposed. Proposed actions are believed to
constitute non-significant amendments of the Forest Plan and are narrow
in scope, dealing only with off highway vehicle riding areas (MAs 10
(C) and 10 (B)) at the Oregon Dunes NRA, an area comprising
approximately 2% of the entire Siuslaw National Forest.
Preliminary Issues
(1) Designation of OHV routes in MA 10 (C) may cause adverse
effects to natural resources, nearby residents and/or other
recreational users of the 10 (C) area.
(2) Minor modifications of MA 10 (C) to MA 10 (B) and associated
changes in OHV use of the area may cause adverse effects to natural
resources, nearby residents and/or other recreation users of motorized
use areas.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. Public comments
about this proposal are requested in order to assist in identifying
issues, determine how to best manage the resources, and to focus the
analysis. Comments received to this notice, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public
record on this proposed action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR part 215.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the
agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality.
Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under
FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service
will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding the
request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied the agency
will return the submission and notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a specified
number of days.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)]. Also, environmental
objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not
raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334,
1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by
the close of the 45-day comment period so that comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
A draft EIS will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and available for public review by December 2011. The EPA will
publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft EIS in the Federal
Register. The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the
date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register. The final EIS is scheduled to be available Summer 2012.
Dated: June 8, 2011.
Katherine Harbick,
Acting Siuslaw National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-15917 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE; P