Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability, 37124-37126 [2011-15799]

Download as PDF 37124 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices FR 6621), the Agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910–0557. The approval expires on May 31, 2014. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at https://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain. Dated: June 20, 2011. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–15800 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2008–D–0610] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July 25, 2011. SUMMARY: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910–New and title ‘‘Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic.’’ Also include the FDA srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ADDRESSES: VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:06 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 223001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301– 796–3792, Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov. In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance: Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability— (OMB Control Number 0910–New) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background BILLING CODE 4160–01–P AGENCY: docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FDA is announcing the availability of a revised draft guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic.’’ In the Federal Register of December 16, 2008 (73 FR 76364), FDA published notice of the availability of a draft guidance of the same title. FDA anticipates that during an influenza pandemic, industry and FDA workforces may be reduced while reporting of adverse events related to widespread use of medical products indicated for the treatment and prevention of influenza may increase, although the extent of these possible changes is unknown. The revised draft guidance discusses FDA’s intended approach to enforcement of adverse event reporting requirements for drugs, biologics, medical devices, and dietary supplements during an influenza pandemic. II. Revisions to the 2008 Draft Guidance FDA is issuing a revised draft guidance that includes recommendations for planning, notification, and documentation for firms that report postmarketing adverse events. The revised draft guidance recommends that each firm’s pandemic influenza continuity of operations plan (COOP) include instructions for reporting adverse events and a plan for the submission of stored reports that were not submitted within regulatory timeframes. The revised draft guidance recommends that firms that are unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements during an influenza pandemic do the following: • Document the conditions that prevent them from meeting normal reporting requirements, PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • Notify the appropriate FDA organizational unit responsible for adverse event reporting compliance when these conditions exist and when the reporting process is restored, and • Maintain records to identify what reports have been stored. These recommendations represent collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) discussed in section IV of this document. In issuing this revised draft guidance, FDA considered all comments that were submitted in response to the December 2008 draft guidance. Most comments requested that greater clarity be provided in certain sections; FDA has revised these sections accordingly. This draft guidance does not address monitoring and reporting of adverse events that might be imposed as a condition of authorization for products authorized for emergency use under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–3). This draft guidance also does not address monitoring and reporting of adverse events as required by regulations establishing the conditions for investigational use of drugs, biologics, and devices. (See 21 CFR parts 312 and 812.) This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA’s good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the Agency’s current thinking on postmarketing adverse event reporting for medical products and dietary supplements during pandemic influenza. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. III. Comments Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Under the PRA, Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information that they E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM 24JNN1 37125 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register for each proposed collection of information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the proposed collection of information set forth in this document. With respect to the collection of information associated with this draft guidance, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1) Whether the proposed information collected is necessary for the proper performance of FDA’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimated burden of the proposed information collected, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of information collected on the respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. The draft guidance explains FDA’s approach to enforcement of adverse event reporting requirements for drugs, biologics, medical devices, and dietary supplements during an influenza pandemic, including an intent not to object to changes in the timing of submission of certain reports during some stages of the pandemic response. The Agency recommends that each firm’s pandemic influenza COOP include instructions for reporting adverse events, including a plan for the submission of stored reports that were not submitted within regulatory timeframes. The draft guidance explains that firms that are unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements during an influenza pandemic should: (1) Maintain documentation of the conditions that prevent them from meeting normal reporting requirements; (2) notify the appropriate FDA organizational unit responsible for adverse event reporting compliance when the conditions exist and when the reporting process is restored; and (3) maintain records to identify what reports have been stored. Based on the number of manufacturers that would be covered by the draft guidance, we estimate that approximately 5,000 firms will add the following to their COOP: (1) Instructions for reporting adverse events; and (2) a plan for submitting stored reports that were not submitted within regulatory timeframes. We estimate that each firm will take approximately 50 hours to prepare the adverse event reporting plan for its COOP. We estimate that approximately 500 firms will be unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements because of conditions caused by an influenza pandemic and that these firms will notify the appropriate FDA organizational unit responsible for adverse event reporting compliance when the conditions exist. Although we do not anticipate such pandemic influenza conditions to occur every year, for purposes of the PRA, we estimate that each of these firms will notify FDA approximately once each year, and that each notification will takem approximately 8 hours to prepare and submit. Concerning the recommendation in the draft guidance that firms unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements maintain documentation of the conditions that prevent them from meeting these requirements and also maintain records to identify what adverse event reports have been stored and when the reporting process is restored, we estimate that approximately 500 firms will each need approximately 8 hours to maintain the documentation and that approximately 500 firms will each need approximately 8 hours to maintain the records. Therefore, the total recordkeeping burden that would result from the draft guidance would be 258,000 hours. The draft guidance also refers to previously approved collections of information found in FDA’s adverse event reporting requirements in 21 CFR 310.305, 314.80, 314.98, 600.80, 606.170, 640.73, 1271.350, and part 803. These regulations contain collections of information that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and are approved under OMB control numbers 0910–0116, 0910–0291, 0910– 0230, 0910–0308, 0910–0437, and 0910– 0543. In addition, the draft guidance also refers to adverse event reports for nonprescription human drug products marketed without an approved application and dietary supplements required under sections 760 and 761 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 379aa and 379aa–1), which include collections of information approved under OMB control numbers 0910–0636 and 0910– 0635. In the Federal Register of January 7, 2011 (76 FR 1170), FDA published a 60day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. No comments were received. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1 Number of respondents Notify FDA when normal reporting is not feasible ............... 1 There Number of responses per respondent 500 Total annual responses 1 Average burden per response 500 8 Total hours 4,000 are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES TABLE 2—ESTIMATED RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1 Number of recordkeepers Annual frequency per recordkeeping Total annual records Hours per record Total hours 5,000 1 5,000 50 250,000 500 1 500 8 4,000 Add adverse event reporting plan to COOP ....................... Maintain documentation of influenza pandemic conditions and resultant high absenteeism ....................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:06 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM 24JNN1 37126 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices TABLE 2—ESTIMATED RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1—Continued Number of recordkeepers Annual frequency per recordkeeping Total annual records Hours per record Total hours 500 1 500 8 4,000 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 258,000 Maintain records to identify what reports have been stored and when the reporting process was restored ................ Total .............................................................................. 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection. V. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/default.htm, https:// www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatory Information/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ DeviceRegulationandGuidance/ GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/Food/Guidance ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, or https://www.regulations.gov. of his right to a hearing concerning this action. DATES: This order is effective June 24, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit applications for termination of debarment to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA– 305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Shade, Division of Compliance Policy (HFC–230), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–4640. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: June 20, 2011. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. I. Background Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(I)) permits FDA to debar an individual if it finds that the individual has been convicted of a misdemeanor under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of drug products under the FD&C Act, and if FDA finds that the type of conduct that served as the basis for the conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. On October 18, 2007, Dr. Rosio pleaded guilty to one count of receipt and delivery of a misbranded drug in violation of 21 U.S.C. 331(c) and one count of misbranding of drugs held for sale in violation of 21 U.S.C. 331(k). On October 26, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California entered judgment against Dr. Rosio for misdemeanor misbranding on those charges. FDA’s finding that debarment is appropriate is based on the misdemeanor convictions referenced herein. The factual basis for the convictions is as follows: Dr. Rosio was a licensed physician in the State of California. Between on or about February 23, 2004, and on or about August 26, 2004, in the Eastern District of California, Dr. Rosio received Botulinum Toxin Type A (TRI-toxin) from Toxin Research International (TRI), which had been shipped in interstate commerce, from Arizona to his clinic in the Eastern District of California. The TRI-toxin that he received was [FR Doc. 2011–15799 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0472] Timothy J. Rosio: Debarment Order AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing an order under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring Timothy J. Rosio, M.D. for 4 years from providing services in any capacity to a person that has an approved or pending drug product application. FDA bases this order on findings that Dr. Rosio was convicted of misdemeanors under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of a drug product under the FD&C Act and that the type of conduct underlying the conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. Dr. Rosio was given notice of the proposed debarment and an opportunity to request a hearing within the timeframe prescribed by regulation. Dr. Rosio failed to respond. Dr. Rosio’s failure to respond constitutes a waiver srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:06 Jun 23, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 misbranded in that it lacked adequate directions for use in humans. The drug was not approved for use in humans by FDA. After receiving the unapproved drug, Dr. Rosio proffered the delivery and caused the delivery of the drug to patients, some on multiple occasions, in the form of injections, for pay and otherwise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 331(c). Dr. Rosio additionally held the drug for sale as BOTOX, the FDA approved Botulinum Toxin Type A product. In so doing, Dr. Rosio acted in a way that caused the drug to be further misbranded by offering it for sale to the public under the name of another drug, specifically BOTOX, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 331(k). As a result of his convictions, on February 16, 2011, FDA sent Dr. Rosio a notice by certified mail proposing to debar him for 4 years from providing services in any capacity to a person that has an approved or pending drug product application. The proposal was based on a finding, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD& C Act, that Dr. Rosio was convicted of a misdemeanor under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of drug products under the FD&C Act, and that the conduct that served as a basis for the conviction undermines the process for the regulation of drugs. The proposal also offered Dr. Rosio an opportunity to request a hearing, providing him 30 days from the date of receipt of the letter in which to file the request, and advised him that failure to request a hearing constituted a waiver of the opportunity for a hearing and of any contentions concerning this action. Dr. Rosio failed to respond within the timeframe prescribed by regulation and has, therefore, waived his opportunity for a hearing and waived any contentions concerning his debarment (21 CFR part 12). II. Findings and Order Therefore, the Director, Office of Enforcement, Office of Regulatory Affairs, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD& C Act under authority delegated to him (Staff Manual Guide 1410.35), finds that Timothy J. Rosio has E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM 24JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37124-37126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-D-0610]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office 
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for 
Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products 
and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July 
25, 2011.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are 
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, 
FAX: 202-395-7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All 
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-New and 
title ``Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event 
Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an 
Influenza Pandemic.'' Also include the FDA docket number found in 
brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3792, 
Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has 
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for 
review and clearance: Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing 
Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements 
During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability--(OMB Control Number 0910-
New)

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a revised draft guidance for 
industry entitled ``Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical 
Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic.'' In the 
Federal Register of December 16, 2008 (73 FR 76364), FDA published 
notice of the availability of a draft guidance of the same title. FDA 
anticipates that during an influenza pandemic, industry and FDA 
workforces may be reduced while reporting of adverse events related to 
widespread use of medical products indicated for the treatment and 
prevention of influenza may increase, although the extent of these 
possible changes is unknown. The revised draft guidance discusses FDA's 
intended approach to enforcement of adverse event reporting 
requirements for drugs, biologics, medical devices, and dietary 
supplements during an influenza pandemic.

II. Revisions to the 2008 Draft Guidance

    FDA is issuing a revised draft guidance that includes 
recommendations for planning, notification, and documentation for firms 
that report postmarketing adverse events. The revised draft guidance 
recommends that each firm's pandemic influenza continuity of operations 
plan (COOP) include instructions for reporting adverse events and a 
plan for the submission of stored reports that were not submitted 
within regulatory timeframes. The revised draft guidance recommends 
that firms that are unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting 
requirements during an influenza pandemic do the following:
     Document the conditions that prevent them from meeting 
normal reporting requirements,
     Notify the appropriate FDA organizational unit responsible 
for adverse event reporting compliance when these conditions exist and 
when the reporting process is restored, and
     Maintain records to identify what reports have been 
stored.
    These recommendations represent collections of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) 
discussed in section IV of this document. In issuing this revised draft 
guidance, FDA considered all comments that were submitted in response 
to the December 2008 draft guidance. Most comments requested that 
greater clarity be provided in certain sections; FDA has revised these 
sections accordingly.
    This draft guidance does not address monitoring and reporting of 
adverse events that might be imposed as a condition of authorization 
for products authorized for emergency use under section 564 of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-
3). This draft guidance also does not address monitoring and reporting 
of adverse events as required by regulations establishing the 
conditions for investigational use of drugs, biologics, and devices. 
(See 21 CFR parts 312 and 812.)
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good 
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when 
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on 
postmarketing adverse event reporting for medical products and dietary 
supplements during pandemic influenza. It does not create or confer any 
rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the 
public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies 
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management 
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this 
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no 
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify 
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of 
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets 
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Under the PRA, Federal agencies must obtain approval from the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of 
information that they

[[Page 37125]]

conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or 
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, 
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a 
60-day notice in the Federal Register for each proposed collection of 
information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To 
comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the 
proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the collection of information associated with this 
draft guidance, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1) 
Whether the proposed information collected is necessary for the proper 
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimated burden of 
the proposed information collected, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to 
minimize the burden of information collected on the respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when 
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
    The draft guidance explains FDA's approach to enforcement of 
adverse event reporting requirements for drugs, biologics, medical 
devices, and dietary supplements during an influenza pandemic, 
including an intent not to object to changes in the timing of 
submission of certain reports during some stages of the pandemic 
response. The Agency recommends that each firm's pandemic influenza 
COOP include instructions for reporting adverse events, including a 
plan for the submission of stored reports that were not submitted 
within regulatory timeframes. The draft guidance explains that firms 
that are unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements 
during an influenza pandemic should: (1) Maintain documentation of the 
conditions that prevent them from meeting normal reporting 
requirements; (2) notify the appropriate FDA organizational unit 
responsible for adverse event reporting compliance when the conditions 
exist and when the reporting process is restored; and (3) maintain 
records to identify what reports have been stored.
    Based on the number of manufacturers that would be covered by the 
draft guidance, we estimate that approximately 5,000 firms will add the 
following to their COOP: (1) Instructions for reporting adverse events; 
and (2) a plan for submitting stored reports that were not submitted 
within regulatory timeframes. We estimate that each firm will take 
approximately 50 hours to prepare the adverse event reporting plan for 
its COOP.
    We estimate that approximately 500 firms will be unable to fulfill 
normal adverse event reporting requirements because of conditions 
caused by an influenza pandemic and that these firms will notify the 
appropriate FDA organizational unit responsible for adverse event 
reporting compliance when the conditions exist. Although we do not 
anticipate such pandemic influenza conditions to occur every year, for 
purposes of the PRA, we estimate that each of these firms will notify 
FDA approximately once each year, and that each notification will takem 
approximately 8 hours to prepare and submit.
    Concerning the recommendation in the draft guidance that firms 
unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements maintain 
documentation of the conditions that prevent them from meeting these 
requirements and also maintain records to identify what adverse event 
reports have been stored and when the reporting process is restored, we 
estimate that approximately 500 firms will each need approximately 8 
hours to maintain the documentation and that approximately 500 firms 
will each need approximately 8 hours to maintain the records. 
Therefore, the total recordkeeping burden that would result from the 
draft guidance would be 258,000 hours.
    The draft guidance also refers to previously approved collections 
of information found in FDA's adverse event reporting requirements in 
21 CFR 310.305, 314.80, 314.98, 600.80, 606.170, 640.73, 1271.350, and 
part 803. These regulations contain collections of information that are 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and are 
approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0116, 0910-0291, 0910-0230, 
0910-0308, 0910-0437, and 0910-0543. In addition, the draft guidance 
also refers to adverse event reports for nonprescription human drug 
products marketed without an approved application and dietary 
supplements required under sections 760 and 761 of the FD&C Act (21 
U.S.C. 379aa and 379aa-1), which include collections of information 
approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0636 and 0910-0635.
    In the Federal Register of January 7, 2011 (76 FR 1170), FDA 
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed 
collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of                        Average
                                     Number of     responses per   Total annual     burden  per     Total hours
                                    respondents     respondent       responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notify FDA when normal reporting             500               1             500               8           4,000
 is not feasible................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.


                                                       Table 2--Estimated Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                           Annual
                                                                        Number of      frequency per     Total annual      Hours per       Total hours
                                                                      recordkeepers    recordkeeping       records           record
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add adverse event reporting plan to COOP...........................           5,000                1            5,000               50          250,000
Maintain documentation of influenza pandemic conditions and                     500                1              500                8            4,000
 resultant high absenteeism........................................

[[Page 37126]]

 
Maintain records to identify what reports have been stored and when             500                1              500                8            4,000
 the reporting process was restored................................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total..........................................................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............         258,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.

V. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at 
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, 
or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: June 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-15799 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.