Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability, 37124-37126 [2011-15799]
Download as PDF
37124
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
FR 6621), the Agency announced that
the proposed information collection had
been submitted to OMB for review and
clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned
OMB control number 0910–0557. The
approval expires on May 31, 2014. A
copy of the supporting statement for this
information collection is available on
the Internet at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain.
Dated: June 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–15800 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–D–0610]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry on Postmarketing Adverse
Event Reporting for Medical Products
and Dietary Supplements During an
Influenza Pandemic; Availability
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by July 25,
2011.
SUMMARY:
To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–New and
title ‘‘Draft Guidance for Industry on
Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting
for Medical Products and Dietary
Supplements During an Influenza
Pandemic.’’ Also include the FDA
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and
Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–
796–3792,
Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov.
In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance: Draft Guidance
for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse
Event Reporting for Medical Products
and Dietary Supplements During an
Influenza Pandemic; Availability—
(OMB Control Number 0910–New)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
AGENCY:
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FDA is announcing the availability of
a revised draft guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Postmarketing Adverse Event
Reporting for Medical Products and
Dietary Supplements During an
Influenza Pandemic.’’ In the Federal
Register of December 16, 2008 (73 FR
76364), FDA published notice of the
availability of a draft guidance of the
same title. FDA anticipates that during
an influenza pandemic, industry and
FDA workforces may be reduced while
reporting of adverse events related to
widespread use of medical products
indicated for the treatment and
prevention of influenza may increase,
although the extent of these possible
changes is unknown. The revised draft
guidance discusses FDA’s intended
approach to enforcement of adverse
event reporting requirements for drugs,
biologics, medical devices, and dietary
supplements during an influenza
pandemic.
II. Revisions to the 2008 Draft Guidance
FDA is issuing a revised draft
guidance that includes
recommendations for planning,
notification, and documentation for
firms that report postmarketing adverse
events. The revised draft guidance
recommends that each firm’s pandemic
influenza continuity of operations plan
(COOP) include instructions for
reporting adverse events and a plan for
the submission of stored reports that
were not submitted within regulatory
timeframes. The revised draft guidance
recommends that firms that are unable
to fulfill normal adverse event reporting
requirements during an influenza
pandemic do the following:
• Document the conditions that
prevent them from meeting normal
reporting requirements,
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Notify the appropriate FDA
organizational unit responsible for
adverse event reporting compliance
when these conditions exist and when
the reporting process is restored, and
• Maintain records to identify what
reports have been stored.
These recommendations represent
collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) discussed
in section IV of this document. In
issuing this revised draft guidance, FDA
considered all comments that were
submitted in response to the December
2008 draft guidance. Most comments
requested that greater clarity be
provided in certain sections; FDA has
revised these sections accordingly.
This draft guidance does not address
monitoring and reporting of adverse
events that might be imposed as a
condition of authorization for products
authorized for emergency use under
section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 360bbb–3). This draft guidance
also does not address monitoring and
reporting of adverse events as required
by regulations establishing the
conditions for investigational use of
drugs, biologics, and devices. (See 21
CFR parts 312 and 812.)
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the Agency’s current thinking
on postmarketing adverse event
reporting for medical products and
dietary supplements during pandemic
influenza. It does not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public.
An alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the PRA, Federal agencies must
obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information that they
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
37125
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of
information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C.
3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and
includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies
to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register for each proposed
collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing this
notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of
information associated with this draft
guidance, FDA invites comments on the
following topics: (1) Whether the
proposed information collected is
necessary for the proper performance of
FDA’s functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimated
burden of the proposed information
collected, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of
information collected on the
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
The draft guidance explains FDA’s
approach to enforcement of adverse
event reporting requirements for drugs,
biologics, medical devices, and dietary
supplements during an influenza
pandemic, including an intent not to
object to changes in the timing of
submission of certain reports during
some stages of the pandemic response.
The Agency recommends that each
firm’s pandemic influenza COOP
include instructions for reporting
adverse events, including a plan for the
submission of stored reports that were
not submitted within regulatory
timeframes. The draft guidance explains
that firms that are unable to fulfill
normal adverse event reporting
requirements during an influenza
pandemic should: (1) Maintain
documentation of the conditions that
prevent them from meeting normal
reporting requirements; (2) notify the
appropriate FDA organizational unit
responsible for adverse event reporting
compliance when the conditions exist
and when the reporting process is
restored; and (3) maintain records to
identify what reports have been stored.
Based on the number of
manufacturers that would be covered by
the draft guidance, we estimate that
approximately 5,000 firms will add the
following to their COOP: (1) Instructions
for reporting adverse events; and (2) a
plan for submitting stored reports that
were not submitted within regulatory
timeframes. We estimate that each firm
will take approximately 50 hours to
prepare the adverse event reporting plan
for its COOP.
We estimate that approximately 500
firms will be unable to fulfill normal
adverse event reporting requirements
because of conditions caused by an
influenza pandemic and that these firms
will notify the appropriate FDA
organizational unit responsible for
adverse event reporting compliance
when the conditions exist. Although we
do not anticipate such pandemic
influenza conditions to occur every
year, for purposes of the PRA, we
estimate that each of these firms will
notify FDA approximately once each
year, and that each notification will
takem approximately 8 hours to prepare
and submit.
Concerning the recommendation in
the draft guidance that firms unable to
fulfill normal adverse event reporting
requirements maintain documentation
of the conditions that prevent them from
meeting these requirements and also
maintain records to identify what
adverse event reports have been stored
and when the reporting process is
restored, we estimate that
approximately 500 firms will each need
approximately 8 hours to maintain the
documentation and that approximately
500 firms will each need approximately
8 hours to maintain the records.
Therefore, the total recordkeeping
burden that would result from the draft
guidance would be 258,000 hours.
The draft guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA’s adverse
event reporting requirements in 21 CFR
310.305, 314.80, 314.98, 600.80,
606.170, 640.73, 1271.350, and part 803.
These regulations contain collections of
information that are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
are approved under OMB control
numbers 0910–0116, 0910–0291, 0910–
0230, 0910–0308, 0910–0437, and 0910–
0543. In addition, the draft guidance
also refers to adverse event reports for
nonprescription human drug products
marketed without an approved
application and dietary supplements
required under sections 760 and 761 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 379aa and
379aa–1), which include collections of
information approved under OMB
control numbers 0910–0636 and 0910–
0635.
In the Federal Register of January 7,
2011 (76 FR 1170), FDA published a 60day notice requesting public comment
on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Notify FDA when normal reporting is not feasible ...............
1 There
Number of
responses per
respondent
500
Total annual
responses
1
Average
burden
per response
500
8
Total hours
4,000
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
Annual
frequency per
recordkeeping
Total annual
records
Hours per
record
Total hours
5,000
1
5,000
50
250,000
500
1
500
8
4,000
Add adverse event reporting plan to COOP .......................
Maintain documentation of influenza pandemic conditions
and resultant high absenteeism .......................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
37126
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1—Continued
Number of
recordkeepers
Annual
frequency per
recordkeeping
Total annual
records
Hours per
record
Total hours
500
1
500
8
4,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
258,000
Maintain records to identify what reports have been stored
and when the reporting process was restored ................
Total ..............................................................................
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
V. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm, https://
www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatory
Information/Guidances/default.htm,
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm,
https://www.fda.gov/Food/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov.
of his right to a hearing concerning this
action.
DATES: This order is effective June 24,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit applications for
termination of debarment to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Shade, Division of Compliance
Policy (HFC–230), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–4640.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: June 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
I. Background
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(I))
permits FDA to debar an individual if it
finds that the individual has been
convicted of a misdemeanor under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of drug products under the
FD&C Act, and if FDA finds that the
type of conduct that served as the basis
for the conviction undermines the
process for the regulation of drugs.
On October 18, 2007, Dr. Rosio
pleaded guilty to one count of receipt
and delivery of a misbranded drug in
violation of 21 U.S.C. 331(c) and one
count of misbranding of drugs held for
sale in violation of 21 U.S.C. 331(k). On
October 26, 2007, the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of California
entered judgment against Dr. Rosio for
misdemeanor misbranding on those
charges.
FDA’s finding that debarment is
appropriate is based on the
misdemeanor convictions referenced
herein. The factual basis for the
convictions is as follows: Dr. Rosio was
a licensed physician in the State of
California. Between on or about
February 23, 2004, and on or about
August 26, 2004, in the Eastern District
of California, Dr. Rosio received
Botulinum Toxin Type A (TRI-toxin)
from Toxin Research International (TRI),
which had been shipped in interstate
commerce, from Arizona to his clinic in
the Eastern District of California. The
TRI-toxin that he received was
[FR Doc. 2011–15799 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0472]
Timothy J. Rosio: Debarment Order
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing an
order under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring
Timothy J. Rosio, M.D. for 4 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person that has an approved or pending
drug product application. FDA bases
this order on findings that Dr. Rosio was
convicted of misdemeanors under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of a drug product under the
FD&C Act and that the type of conduct
underlying the conviction undermines
the process for the regulation of drugs.
Dr. Rosio was given notice of the
proposed debarment and an opportunity
to request a hearing within the
timeframe prescribed by regulation. Dr.
Rosio failed to respond. Dr. Rosio’s
failure to respond constitutes a waiver
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
misbranded in that it lacked adequate
directions for use in humans. The drug
was not approved for use in humans by
FDA. After receiving the unapproved
drug, Dr. Rosio proffered the delivery
and caused the delivery of the drug to
patients, some on multiple occasions, in
the form of injections, for pay and
otherwise, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
331(c). Dr. Rosio additionally held the
drug for sale as BOTOX, the FDA
approved Botulinum Toxin Type A
product. In so doing, Dr. Rosio acted in
a way that caused the drug to be further
misbranded by offering it for sale to the
public under the name of another drug,
specifically BOTOX, in violation of 21
U.S.C. 331(k).
As a result of his convictions, on
February 16, 2011, FDA sent Dr. Rosio
a notice by certified mail proposing to
debar him for 4 years from providing
services in any capacity to a person that
has an approved or pending drug
product application. The proposal was
based on a finding, under section
306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the FD& C Act, that
Dr. Rosio was convicted of a
misdemeanor under Federal law for
conduct relating to the regulation of
drug products under the FD&C Act, and
that the conduct that served as a basis
for the conviction undermines the
process for the regulation of drugs. The
proposal also offered Dr. Rosio an
opportunity to request a hearing,
providing him 30 days from the date of
receipt of the letter in which to file the
request, and advised him that failure to
request a hearing constituted a waiver of
the opportunity for a hearing and of any
contentions concerning this action. Dr.
Rosio failed to respond within the
timeframe prescribed by regulation and
has, therefore, waived his opportunity
for a hearing and waived any
contentions concerning his debarment
(21 CFR part 12).
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Director, Office of
Enforcement, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(I)
of the FD& C Act under authority
delegated to him (Staff Manual Guide
1410.35), finds that Timothy J. Rosio has
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37124-37126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15799]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-D-0610]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products
and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July
25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-New and
title ``Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing Adverse Event
Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements During an
Influenza Pandemic.'' Also include the FDA docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3792,
Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance: Draft Guidance for Industry on Postmarketing
Adverse Event Reporting for Medical Products and Dietary Supplements
During an Influenza Pandemic; Availability--(OMB Control Number 0910-
New)
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a revised draft guidance for
industry entitled ``Postmarketing Adverse Event Reporting for Medical
Products and Dietary Supplements During an Influenza Pandemic.'' In the
Federal Register of December 16, 2008 (73 FR 76364), FDA published
notice of the availability of a draft guidance of the same title. FDA
anticipates that during an influenza pandemic, industry and FDA
workforces may be reduced while reporting of adverse events related to
widespread use of medical products indicated for the treatment and
prevention of influenza may increase, although the extent of these
possible changes is unknown. The revised draft guidance discusses FDA's
intended approach to enforcement of adverse event reporting
requirements for drugs, biologics, medical devices, and dietary
supplements during an influenza pandemic.
II. Revisions to the 2008 Draft Guidance
FDA is issuing a revised draft guidance that includes
recommendations for planning, notification, and documentation for firms
that report postmarketing adverse events. The revised draft guidance
recommends that each firm's pandemic influenza continuity of operations
plan (COOP) include instructions for reporting adverse events and a
plan for the submission of stored reports that were not submitted
within regulatory timeframes. The revised draft guidance recommends
that firms that are unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting
requirements during an influenza pandemic do the following:
Document the conditions that prevent them from meeting
normal reporting requirements,
Notify the appropriate FDA organizational unit responsible
for adverse event reporting compliance when these conditions exist and
when the reporting process is restored, and
Maintain records to identify what reports have been
stored.
These recommendations represent collections of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520)
discussed in section IV of this document. In issuing this revised draft
guidance, FDA considered all comments that were submitted in response
to the December 2008 draft guidance. Most comments requested that
greater clarity be provided in certain sections; FDA has revised these
sections accordingly.
This draft guidance does not address monitoring and reporting of
adverse events that might be imposed as a condition of authorization
for products authorized for emergency use under section 564 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-
3). This draft guidance also does not address monitoring and reporting
of adverse events as required by regulations establishing the
conditions for investigational use of drugs, biologics, and devices.
(See 21 CFR parts 312 and 812.)
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on
postmarketing adverse event reporting for medical products and dietary
supplements during pandemic influenza. It does not create or confer any
rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the PRA, Federal agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information that they
[[Page 37125]]
conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register for each proposed collection of
information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the
proposed collection of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of information associated with this
draft guidance, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1)
Whether the proposed information collected is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimated burden of
the proposed information collected, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of information collected on the respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
The draft guidance explains FDA's approach to enforcement of
adverse event reporting requirements for drugs, biologics, medical
devices, and dietary supplements during an influenza pandemic,
including an intent not to object to changes in the timing of
submission of certain reports during some stages of the pandemic
response. The Agency recommends that each firm's pandemic influenza
COOP include instructions for reporting adverse events, including a
plan for the submission of stored reports that were not submitted
within regulatory timeframes. The draft guidance explains that firms
that are unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements
during an influenza pandemic should: (1) Maintain documentation of the
conditions that prevent them from meeting normal reporting
requirements; (2) notify the appropriate FDA organizational unit
responsible for adverse event reporting compliance when the conditions
exist and when the reporting process is restored; and (3) maintain
records to identify what reports have been stored.
Based on the number of manufacturers that would be covered by the
draft guidance, we estimate that approximately 5,000 firms will add the
following to their COOP: (1) Instructions for reporting adverse events;
and (2) a plan for submitting stored reports that were not submitted
within regulatory timeframes. We estimate that each firm will take
approximately 50 hours to prepare the adverse event reporting plan for
its COOP.
We estimate that approximately 500 firms will be unable to fulfill
normal adverse event reporting requirements because of conditions
caused by an influenza pandemic and that these firms will notify the
appropriate FDA organizational unit responsible for adverse event
reporting compliance when the conditions exist. Although we do not
anticipate such pandemic influenza conditions to occur every year, for
purposes of the PRA, we estimate that each of these firms will notify
FDA approximately once each year, and that each notification will takem
approximately 8 hours to prepare and submit.
Concerning the recommendation in the draft guidance that firms
unable to fulfill normal adverse event reporting requirements maintain
documentation of the conditions that prevent them from meeting these
requirements and also maintain records to identify what adverse event
reports have been stored and when the reporting process is restored, we
estimate that approximately 500 firms will each need approximately 8
hours to maintain the documentation and that approximately 500 firms
will each need approximately 8 hours to maintain the records.
Therefore, the total recordkeeping burden that would result from the
draft guidance would be 258,000 hours.
The draft guidance also refers to previously approved collections
of information found in FDA's adverse event reporting requirements in
21 CFR 310.305, 314.80, 314.98, 600.80, 606.170, 640.73, 1271.350, and
part 803. These regulations contain collections of information that are
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and are
approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0116, 0910-0291, 0910-0230,
0910-0308, 0910-0437, and 0910-0543. In addition, the draft guidance
also refers to adverse event reports for nonprescription human drug
products marketed without an approved application and dietary
supplements required under sections 760 and 761 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 379aa and 379aa-1), which include collections of information
approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0636 and 0910-0635.
In the Federal Register of January 7, 2011 (76 FR 1170), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Number of responses per Total annual burden per Total hours
respondents respondent responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notify FDA when normal reporting 500 1 500 8 4,000
is not feasible................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
Table 2--Estimated Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Number of frequency per Total annual Hours per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeping records record
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add adverse event reporting plan to COOP........................... 5,000 1 5,000 50 250,000
Maintain documentation of influenza pandemic conditions and 500 1 500 8 4,000
resultant high absenteeism........................................
[[Page 37126]]
Maintain records to identify what reports have been stored and when 500 1 500 8 4,000
the reporting process was restored................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.......................................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... 258,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
V. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm,
or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: June 20, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-15799 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P