Safety Zone; Independence Day Fireworks Celebration for the City of Richmond, Richmond, CA, 37012-37014 [2011-15798]
Download as PDF
37012
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter
the safety zone on VHF–16 or the 24hour Command Center via telephone at
(415) 399–3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 9 a.m. on July 3, 2011
through 10:15 p.m. on July 4, 2011.
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Cynthia. L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
Regulatory Information
[FR Doc. 2011–15795 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0399]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Independence Day
Fireworks Celebration for the City of
Richmond, Richmond, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters of Richmond Inner
Harbor, off of the Lucretia Edwards Park
in Richmond, CA in support of the
Independence Day Fireworks
Celebration for the City of Richmond.
This temporary safety zone is
established to ensure the safety of
participants and spectators from the
dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or remaining in
the safety zone without permission of
the Captain of the Port or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m.
through 10 p.m. on July 3, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0399 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0399 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade Liezl
Nicholas at (415) 399–7436, or e-mail
D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
event would occur before the
rulemaking process would be
completed. Because of the dangers
posed by the pyrotechnics used in these
fireworks displays, the safety zones are
necessary to provide for the safety of
event participants, spectators, spectator
craft, and other vessels transiting the
event area. For the safety concerns
noted, it would be impracticable to not
have these regulations in effect during
the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Any delay in the effective date
of this rule would expose mariners to
the dangers posed by the pyrotechnics
used in the fireworks display.
Background and Purpose
The City of Richmond will sponsor
the Independence Day Fireworks
Celebration for the City of Richmond on
July 3, 2011, on the navigable waters of
Richmond Inner Harbor, off of the
Lucretia Edwards Park, Richmond,
California. The fireworks display is
meant for entertainment purposes. This
temporary safety zone establishes a
temporary restricted area on the waters
surrounding the fireworks launch site
during the fireworks displays. This
temporary safety zone around the
launch site is necessary to protect
spectators, vessels, and other property
from the hazards associated with the
pyrotechnics over the water. The Coast
Guard has granted the event sponsor a
marine event permit for the fireworks
displays.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion of Rule
From 9 a.m. until 9:30 p.m. on July 3,
2011, the temporary safety zone will
extend 100 feet while pyrotechnics are
loaded onto the land launch site at
position 37°54′34.14″ N, 122°21′16.93″
W (NAD 83). The fireworks display will
occur from 9:30 p.m. until 9:50 p.m.,
during which the safety zone will
extend 1,000 feet off of the Lucretia
Edwards Park land launch site at
position 37°51′40.34″ N, 122°19′19.59″
W (NAD 83). At 10 p.m. the safety zone
shall terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety
zone will be to restrict navigation in the
vicinity of the fireworks site while the
fireworks are set up, and until the
conclusion of the scheduled displays.
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations
are needed to keep spectators and
vessels a safe distance away from the
launch site to ensure the safety of
participants, spectators, and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this rule restricts access to
the waters encompassed by the safety
zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant. The entities most likely to
be affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities. In addition, the
rule will only restrict access for a
limited time. Finally, the Public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners will notify
the users of local waterway to ensure
that the safety zone will result in
minimum impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Although this rule may affect owners
and operators of pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities and
sightseeing, it will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for several
reasons: (i) This rule will encompass
only a small portion of the waterway for
a limited period of time; (ii) vessel
traffic can pass safely around the area;
(iii) vessels engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing have ample
space outside of the affected areas of
San Francisco Bay, CA, to engage in
these activities; and (iv) the maritime
public will be advised in advance of this
safety zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37013
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under Figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas
and security or safety zones.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
37014
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T11–424 to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T11–424 Safety Zone; Independence
Day Fireworks Celebration for the City of
Richmond, Richmond, CA.
(a) Location. (1) This temporary safety
zone is established for the navigable
waters of Richmond Inner Harbor, off of
the Lucretia Edwards Park, Richmond,
CA. The fireworks launch site will be
located in position: 37°54′34.14″ N,
122°21′16.93″ W (NAD 83).
(2) From 9 a.m. until 9:30 p.m., the
temporary safety zone will extend 100
feet while pyrotechnics are loaded onto
the land launch site. From 9:30 p.m.
until 9:50 p.m., the area to which the
temporary safety zone applies will
encompass the navigable waters around
the fireworks launch site off of the
Lucretia Edwards Park within a radius
of 1,000 feet. At 10 p.m., the safety zone
shall terminate.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zones on VHF–16 or through the 24hour Command Center at telephone
(415) 399–3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 9 a.m. through 10 p.m. on
July 3, 2011.
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Cynthia L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2011–15798 Filed 6–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
measurement techniques and greater
flexibility in the selection of analytical
methods, thereby reducing monitoring
costs while maintaining public health
protection.
DATES:
This action is effective June 24,
2011.
Safe
Drinking Water Hotline (800) 426–4791
or Glynda Smith, Technical Support
Center, Standards and Risk Management
Division, Office of Ground Water and
Drinking Water (MS 140),
Environmental Protection Agency, 26
West Martin Luther King Drive,
Cincinnati, OH 45268; telephone
number: (513) 569–7652; e-mail address:
smith.glynda@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
I. General Information
40 CFR Part 141
A. Does this action apply to me?
[EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0413; FRL–9322–3]
Public water systems are the regulated
entities required to measure
contaminants in drinking water
samples. In addition, EPA Regions as
well as States and Tribal governments
with authority to administer the
regulatory program for public water
systems under SDWA may also measure
contaminants in water samples. When
EPA sets a monitoring requirement in its
national primary drinking water
regulations for a given contaminant, the
Agency also establishes in the
regulations standardized test procedures
for analysis of the contaminant. This
action makes alternative testing
methods available for particular
drinking water contaminants beyond the
testing methods currently established in
the regulations. EPA is providing public
water systems required to test water
samples with a choice of using either a
test procedure already established in the
existing regulations or an alternative test
procedure that has been approved in
this action or in prior expedited
approval actions. Categories and entities
that may ultimately be affected by this
action include:
Expedited Approval of Alternative Test
Procedures for the Analysis of
Contaminants Under the Safe Drinking
Water Act; Analysis and Sampling
Procedures
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action announces the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA’s) approval of alternative testing
methods for use in measuring the levels
of contaminants in drinking water and
determining compliance with national
primary drinking water regulations. The
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
authorizes EPA to approve the use of
alternative testing methods through
publication in the Federal Register. EPA
is using this streamlined authority to
make 11 additional methods available
for analyzing drinking water samples
required by regulation. This expedited
approach provides public water
systems, laboratories, and primacy
agencies with more timely access to new
SUMMARY:
NAICS 1
Category
Examples of potentially regulated entities
State, Local, & Tribal Governments.
States, local and tribal governments that analyze water samples on behalf of public water systems
required to conduct such analysis; States, local and tribal governments that themselves operate
community and non-transient non-community water systems required to monitor.
Private operators of community and non-transient non-community water systems required to monitor
Municipal operators of community and non-transient non-community water systems required to monitor.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Industry ............................
Municipalities ....................
1 North
924110
221310
924110
American Industry Classification System.
This table is not exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding
entities likely to be affected by this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:28 Jun 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
action. This table lists the types of
entities that EPA is now aware could
potentially be affected by this action.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Other types of entities not listed in the
table could also be impacted. To
determine whether your facility is
E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM
24JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37012-37014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15798]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0399]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Independence Day Fireworks Celebration for the City
of Richmond, Richmond, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of Richmond Inner Harbor, off of the Lucretia Edwards
Park in Richmond, CA in support of the Independence Day Fireworks
Celebration for the City of Richmond. This temporary safety zone is
established to ensure the safety of participants and spectators from
the dangers associated with the pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
remaining in the safety zone without permission of the Captain of the
Port or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. through 10 p.m. on July 3,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0399 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0399 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade Liezl Nicholas at (415)
399-7436, or e-mail
D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the event would occur before the
rulemaking process would be completed. Because of the dangers posed by
the pyrotechnics used in these fireworks displays, the safety zones are
necessary to provide for the safety of event participants, spectators,
spectator craft, and other vessels transiting the event area. For the
safety concerns noted, it would be impracticable to not have these
regulations in effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay in the effective date of
this rule would expose mariners to the dangers posed by the
pyrotechnics used in the fireworks display.
Background and Purpose
The City of Richmond will sponsor the Independence Day Fireworks
Celebration for the City of Richmond on July 3, 2011, on the navigable
waters of Richmond Inner Harbor, off of the Lucretia Edwards Park,
Richmond, California. The fireworks display is meant for entertainment
purposes. This temporary safety zone establishes a temporary restricted
area on the waters surrounding the fireworks launch site during the
fireworks displays. This temporary safety zone around the launch site
is necessary to protect spectators, vessels, and other property from
the hazards associated with the pyrotechnics over the water. The Coast
Guard has granted the event sponsor a marine event permit for the
fireworks displays.
Discussion of Rule
From 9 a.m. until 9:30 p.m. on July 3, 2011, the temporary safety
zone will extend 100 feet while pyrotechnics are loaded onto the land
launch site at position 37[deg]54'34.14'' N, 122[deg]21'16.93'' W (NAD
83). The fireworks display will occur from 9:30 p.m. until 9:50 p.m.,
during which the safety zone will extend 1,000 feet off of the Lucretia
Edwards Park land launch site at position 37[deg]51'40.34'' N,
122[deg]19'19.59'' W (NAD 83). At 10 p.m. the safety zone shall
terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the fireworks site while the fireworks
are set up, and until the conclusion of the scheduled displays. Except
for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted area. These
regulations are needed to keep spectators and vessels a safe distance
away from the launch site to ensure the safety of participants,
spectators, and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by
the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant. The
entities most likely to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities. In addition, the rule will only restrict
access for a limited time. Finally, the Public Broadcast Notice to
Mariners will notify the users of local waterway to ensure that the
safety zone will result in minimum impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently
[[Page 37013]]
owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Although this rule may affect owners and operators of pleasure
craft engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing, it will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for several reasons: (i) This rule will encompass only a small
portion of the waterway for a limited period of time; (ii) vessel
traffic can pass safely around the area; (iii) vessels engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing have ample space outside of the
affected areas of San Francisco Bay, CA, to engage in these activities;
and (iv) the maritime public will be advised in advance of this safety
zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under Figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or
safety zones.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 37014]]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T11-424 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-424 Safety Zone; Independence Day Fireworks Celebration
for the City of Richmond, Richmond, CA.
(a) Location. (1) This temporary safety zone is established for the
navigable waters of Richmond Inner Harbor, off of the Lucretia Edwards
Park, Richmond, CA. The fireworks launch site will be located in
position: 37[deg]54'34.14'' N, 122[deg]21'16.93'' W (NAD 83).
(2) From 9 a.m. until 9:30 p.m., the temporary safety zone will
extend 100 feet while pyrotechnics are loaded onto the land launch
site. From 9:30 p.m. until 9:50 p.m., the area to which the temporary
safety zone applies will encompass the navigable waters around the
fireworks launch site off of the Lucretia Edwards Park within a radius
of 1,000 feet. At 10 p.m., the safety zone shall terminate.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec. 165.23,
entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zones on VHF-16 or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is effective from 9 a.m. through
10 p.m. on July 3, 2011.
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Cynthia L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2011-15798 Filed 6-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P