Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model GVI Airplane; Design Roll Maneuver Requirement for Electronic Flight Controls, 36870-36871 [2011-15708]
Download as PDF
36870
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM441; Special Conditions No.
25–433–SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model
GVI Airplane; Design Roll Maneuver
Requirement for Electronic Flight
Controls
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Gulfstream GVI airplane.
This airplane will have a novel or
unusual design feature associated with
an electronic flight control system that
provides roll control of the airplane
through pilot inputs to the flight
computers. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: July 25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Niedermeyer, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety Branch, ANM–115, Transport
Standards Staff, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–2279; electronic
mail carl.niedermeyer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Background
On March 29, 2005, Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘Gulfstream’’) applied for
an FAA type certificate for its new
Gulfstream Model GVI passenger
airplane. Gulfstream later applied for,
and was granted, an extension of time
for the type certificate, which changed
the effective application date to
September 28, 2006. The Gulfstream
Model GVI airplane will be an all-new,
two-engine jet transport airplane. The
maximum takeoff weight will be 99,600
pounds, with a maximum passenger
count of 19 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17,
Gulfstream must show that the
Gulfstream Model GVI airplane
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the GVI’’)
meets the applicable provisions of 14
CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–119, 25–
122, and 25–124. If the Administrator
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for the GVI because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to complying with the
applicable airworthiness regulations
and special conditions, the GVI must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The
FAA must also issue a finding of
regulatory adequacy pursuant to section
611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design features, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under provisions of § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Gulfstream Model GVI airplane is
equipped with an electronic flight
control system that provides roll control
of the airplane through pilot inputs to
the flight computers. The current design
roll maneuver requirement for structural
loads in 14 CFR part 25 is inadequate
for addressing an airplane with
electronic flight controls that affect
maneuvering. Special conditions are
needed to take into account the effects
of an electronic flight control system.
Discussion
The GVI is equipped with an
electronic flight control system that
provides roll control of the airplane
through pilot inputs to the flight
computers. Current part 25
airworthiness regulations account for
‘‘control laws’’ for which aileron
deflection is proportional to control
wheel deflection. They do not address
any nonlinearities 1 or other effects on
aileron and spoiler actuation that may
be caused by electronic flight controls.
Therefore, the FAA considers the flight
control system to be a novel and
unusual feature compared to those
envisioned when the current regulations
were adopted. Since this type of system
may affect flight loads, and therefore the
1 A nonlinearity is a situation where output does
not change in the same proportion as input.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
structural capability of the airplane,
special conditions are needed to address
these effects.
These special conditions differ from
current requirements in that the special
conditions require that the roll
maneuver result from defined
movements of the cockpit roll control as
opposed to defined aileron deflections.
Also, these special conditions require an
additional load condition at design
maneuvering speed (VA), in which the
cockpit roll control is returned to
neutral following the initial roll input.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions
No. 25–11–01–SC for Gulfstream GVI
airplanes was published in the Federal
Register on February 14, 2011 (76 FR
8319). Only one comment was received,
which was supportive, so these special
conditions are adopted as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the
Gulfstream Model GVI airplane. Should
Gulfstream apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include
another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design features, these
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features of the GVI. It
is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Gulfstream GVI
airplanes.
In lieu of compliance with § 25.349(a),
Gulfstream must comply with the
following special conditions.
The following conditions, speeds, and
cockpit roll control motions (except as
the motions may be limited by pilot
effort) must be considered in
combination with an airplane load
factor of zero and of two-thirds of the
positive maneuvering factor used in
design. In determining the resulting
control surface deflections, the torsional
flexibility of the wing must be
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
considered in accordance with
§ 25.301(b):
1. Conditions corresponding to steady
rolling velocities must be investigated.
In addition, conditions corresponding to
maximum angular acceleration must be
investigated for airplanes with engines
or other weight concentrations outboard
of the fuselage. For the angular
acceleration conditions, zero rolling
velocity may be assumed in the absence
of a rational time history investigation
of the maneuver.
2. At VA, sudden movement of the
cockpit roll control up to the limit is
assumed. The position of the cockpit
roll control must be maintained until a
steady roll rate is achieved and then
must be returned suddenly to the
neutral position.
3. At VC, the cockpit roll control must
be moved suddenly and maintained so
as to achieve a roll rate not less than
that obtained in paragraph 2.
4. At VD, the cockpit roll control must
be moved suddenly and maintained so
as to achieve a roll rate not less than one
third of that obtained in paragraph 2.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 13,
2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–15708 Filed 6–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0110; Airspace
Docket No. 07–ASW–8]
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification of Restricted Areas R–
4401A, R–4401B, and R–4401C; Camp
Shelby, MS
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies
restricted areas R–4401A, R–4401B, and
R–4401C, at Camp Shelby, MS, to
ensure that aircraft remain within the
confines of restricted airspace during
high altitude munitions delivery and to
enhance the efficient use of airspace in
the vicinity of Camp Shelby, MS.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, August
25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace, Regulations and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Special Use Airspace (SUA) at Camp
Shelby, MS, currently consists of three
restricted areas that are layered from the
surface up to 29,000 feet MSL.
Restricted area R–4401A extends from
the surface up to 4,000 feet MSL; R–
4401B overlies R–4401A and extends
from 4,000 feet MSL up to 18,000 feet
MSL; R–4401C overlies A and B and
extends from 18,000 feet MSL up to
29,000 feet MSL. Adjacent to the
restricted areas are two military
operations areas (MOA). The De Soto 1
MOA abuts the north, east and south
sides of the restricted areas and extends
from 500 feet AGL up to 10,000 feet
MSL. The De Soto 2 MOA lies adjacent
to the east and south sides of De Soto
1 MOA and extends from 100 feet AGL
up to 5,000 feet MSL.
Military Operations Areas (MOA)
MOAs are nonregulatory airspace
areas that are established
administratively and published in the
National Flight Data Digest (NFDD)
rather than through rulemaking
procedures. MOAs are established to
separate or segregate non-hazardous
military flight activities from aircraft
operating in accordance with
instrument flight rules (IFR), and to
advise pilots flying under visual flight
rules (VFR) where these activities are
conducted. IFR aircraft may be routed
through an active MOA only by
agreement with the using agency and
only when air traffic control can provide
approved separation from the MOA
activity. VFR pilots are not restricted
from flying in an active MOA, but they
are advised to exercise caution while
doing so. Although MOAs are not
regulatory airspace actions, the De Soto
MOAs are described in this rule because
they form an integral part of the Camp
Shelby Range airspace area. The MOA
changes will be published separately in
the NFDD.
History
On Wednesday, February 20, 2008,
the FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to modify
Restricted Areas R–4401A, R–4401B and
R–4401C at Camp Shelby, MS, by
moving the southeastern corner of the
restricted areas approximately 2
nautical miles (NM) to the east of the
present alignment (73 FR 9241). The
FAA proposed this change to ‘‘square
off’’ the corner to ensure that aircraft
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36871
conducting high altitude munitions
delivery training remain within the
confines of restricted airspace.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
In a separate action, on February 11,
2008, the FAA distributed a
nonrulemaking circular soliciting public
comment on a proposal to modify the
De Soto 1 and De Soto 2 MOAs and to
establish two new MOAs in order to
raise the upper altitude limit of the
MOA airspace at the Camp Shelby
Range up to but not including FL 180
(Airspace Study No. 08–ASW–09NR). In
the circular, the FAA proposed to
modify the De Soto 1 MOA boundary to
match the amended R–4401A/R–4401B
boundary and to change the De Soto 1
MOA ceiling to read ‘‘to but not
including 10,000 feet MSL.’’ The De
Soto 2 MOA altitude ceiling would be
changed to read ‘‘to but not including
5,000 feet MSL,’’ but the De Soto 2
boundary would not be changed.
In addition, two new MOAs were
proposed. The De Soto 3 MOA would
overlie De Soto 1 and would extend
from 10,000 feet MSL to but not
including FL 180; and the De Soto 4
would overlie De Soto 2 with altitudes
extending from 5,000 feet MSL to but
not including FL 180. The Air National
Guard (ANG) requested this change
because the current MOAs do not
provide sufficient altitudes to
accommodate aircrew training in longrange set-up and stand-off tactics.
Seven comments were received in
response to the NPRM and the circular.
Discussion of Comments
All of the commenters opposed the
proposed rulemaking. Most commenters
argued that the proposed airspace
expansions would adversely impact
civil aircraft operations in the area; and,
in particular, those aircraft transiting the
area via VOR Federal airways V–11 and
V–70. Since this is a small boundary
adjustment, with the expansion
extending into existing MOA airspace,
the FAA concluded the restricted area
boundary change is not expected to
impact air traffic in the area. Airways
V–11 and V–70 do extend through the
proposed expanded MOA airspace.
However, in response to the
comments, the configuration and
altitude structure of the MOAs have
been revised. Instead of one large MOA
(De Soto 4) overlying the entire Desoto
2 MOA, the proposed De Soto 4 MOA
airspace is split into two separate MOAs
(i.e., De Soto 4 and De Soto 5). The
Desoto 4 MOA will extend from 5,000
feet MSL to but not including FL 180
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36870-36871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15708]
[[Page 36870]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM441; Special Conditions No. 25-433-SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model GVI Airplane; Design Roll
Maneuver Requirement for Electronic Flight Controls
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Gulfstream GVI
airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with an electronic flight control system that provides roll
control of the airplane through pilot inputs to the flight computers.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that
the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: July 25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Niedermeyer, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety Branch, ANM-115, Transport Standards Staff, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2279; electronic
mail carl.niedermeyer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 29, 2005, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (hereafter
referred to as ``Gulfstream'') applied for an FAA type certificate for
its new Gulfstream Model GVI passenger airplane. Gulfstream later
applied for, and was granted, an extension of time for the type
certificate, which changed the effective application date to September
28, 2006. The Gulfstream Model GVI airplane will be an all-new, two-
engine jet transport airplane. The maximum takeoff weight will be
99,600 pounds, with a maximum passenger count of 19 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
21.17, Gulfstream must show that the Gulfstream Model GVI airplane
(hereafter referred to as ``the GVI'') meets the applicable provisions
of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-119, 25-
122, and 25-124. If the Administrator finds that the applicable
airworthiness regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the GVI because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of Sec. 21.16.
In addition to complying with the applicable airworthiness
regulations and special conditions, the GVI must comply with the fuel
vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The FAA must also issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to section 611 of Public Law
92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design features, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Gulfstream Model GVI airplane is equipped with an electronic
flight control system that provides roll control of the airplane
through pilot inputs to the flight computers. The current design roll
maneuver requirement for structural loads in 14 CFR part 25 is
inadequate for addressing an airplane with electronic flight controls
that affect maneuvering. Special conditions are needed to take into
account the effects of an electronic flight control system.
Discussion
The GVI is equipped with an electronic flight control system that
provides roll control of the airplane through pilot inputs to the
flight computers. Current part 25 airworthiness regulations account for
``control laws'' for which aileron deflection is proportional to
control wheel deflection. They do not address any nonlinearities \1\ or
other effects on aileron and spoiler actuation that may be caused by
electronic flight controls. Therefore, the FAA considers the flight
control system to be a novel and unusual feature compared to those
envisioned when the current regulations were adopted. Since this type
of system may affect flight loads, and therefore the structural
capability of the airplane, special conditions are needed to address
these effects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A nonlinearity is a situation where output does not change
in the same proportion as input.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These special conditions differ from current requirements in that
the special conditions require that the roll maneuver result from
defined movements of the cockpit roll control as opposed to defined
aileron deflections. Also, these special conditions require an
additional load condition at design maneuvering speed (VA),
in which the cockpit roll control is returned to neutral following the
initial roll input.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions No. 25-11-01-SC for
Gulfstream GVI airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
February 14, 2011 (76 FR 8319). Only one comment was received, which
was supportive, so these special conditions are adopted as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Gulfstream Model GVI airplane. Should Gulfstream apply at a later date
for a change to the type certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual design features, these special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
of the GVI. It is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Gulfstream GVI airplanes.
In lieu of compliance with Sec. 25.349(a), Gulfstream must comply
with the following special conditions.
The following conditions, speeds, and cockpit roll control motions
(except as the motions may be limited by pilot effort) must be
considered in combination with an airplane load factor of zero and of
two-thirds of the positive maneuvering factor used in design. In
determining the resulting control surface deflections, the torsional
flexibility of the wing must be
[[Page 36871]]
considered in accordance with Sec. 25.301(b):
1. Conditions corresponding to steady rolling velocities must be
investigated. In addition, conditions corresponding to maximum angular
acceleration must be investigated for airplanes with engines or other
weight concentrations outboard of the fuselage. For the angular
acceleration conditions, zero rolling velocity may be assumed in the
absence of a rational time history investigation of the maneuver.
2. At VA, sudden movement of the cockpit roll control up
to the limit is assumed. The position of the cockpit roll control must
be maintained until a steady roll rate is achieved and then must be
returned suddenly to the neutral position.
3. At VC, the cockpit roll control must be moved
suddenly and maintained so as to achieve a roll rate not less than that
obtained in paragraph 2.
4. At VD, the cockpit roll control must be moved
suddenly and maintained so as to achieve a roll rate not less than one
third of that obtained in paragraph 2.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 13, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-15708 Filed 6-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P