Modification of Restricted Areas R-4401A, R-4401B, and R-4401C; Camp Shelby, MS, 36871-36873 [2011-15702]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
considered in accordance with
§ 25.301(b):
1. Conditions corresponding to steady
rolling velocities must be investigated.
In addition, conditions corresponding to
maximum angular acceleration must be
investigated for airplanes with engines
or other weight concentrations outboard
of the fuselage. For the angular
acceleration conditions, zero rolling
velocity may be assumed in the absence
of a rational time history investigation
of the maneuver.
2. At VA, sudden movement of the
cockpit roll control up to the limit is
assumed. The position of the cockpit
roll control must be maintained until a
steady roll rate is achieved and then
must be returned suddenly to the
neutral position.
3. At VC, the cockpit roll control must
be moved suddenly and maintained so
as to achieve a roll rate not less than
that obtained in paragraph 2.
4. At VD, the cockpit roll control must
be moved suddenly and maintained so
as to achieve a roll rate not less than one
third of that obtained in paragraph 2.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 13,
2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–15708 Filed 6–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0110; Airspace
Docket No. 07–ASW–8]
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification of Restricted Areas R–
4401A, R–4401B, and R–4401C; Camp
Shelby, MS
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies
restricted areas R–4401A, R–4401B, and
R–4401C, at Camp Shelby, MS, to
ensure that aircraft remain within the
confines of restricted airspace during
high altitude munitions delivery and to
enhance the efficient use of airspace in
the vicinity of Camp Shelby, MS.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, August
25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace, Regulations and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Special Use Airspace (SUA) at Camp
Shelby, MS, currently consists of three
restricted areas that are layered from the
surface up to 29,000 feet MSL.
Restricted area R–4401A extends from
the surface up to 4,000 feet MSL; R–
4401B overlies R–4401A and extends
from 4,000 feet MSL up to 18,000 feet
MSL; R–4401C overlies A and B and
extends from 18,000 feet MSL up to
29,000 feet MSL. Adjacent to the
restricted areas are two military
operations areas (MOA). The De Soto 1
MOA abuts the north, east and south
sides of the restricted areas and extends
from 500 feet AGL up to 10,000 feet
MSL. The De Soto 2 MOA lies adjacent
to the east and south sides of De Soto
1 MOA and extends from 100 feet AGL
up to 5,000 feet MSL.
Military Operations Areas (MOA)
MOAs are nonregulatory airspace
areas that are established
administratively and published in the
National Flight Data Digest (NFDD)
rather than through rulemaking
procedures. MOAs are established to
separate or segregate non-hazardous
military flight activities from aircraft
operating in accordance with
instrument flight rules (IFR), and to
advise pilots flying under visual flight
rules (VFR) where these activities are
conducted. IFR aircraft may be routed
through an active MOA only by
agreement with the using agency and
only when air traffic control can provide
approved separation from the MOA
activity. VFR pilots are not restricted
from flying in an active MOA, but they
are advised to exercise caution while
doing so. Although MOAs are not
regulatory airspace actions, the De Soto
MOAs are described in this rule because
they form an integral part of the Camp
Shelby Range airspace area. The MOA
changes will be published separately in
the NFDD.
History
On Wednesday, February 20, 2008,
the FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to modify
Restricted Areas R–4401A, R–4401B and
R–4401C at Camp Shelby, MS, by
moving the southeastern corner of the
restricted areas approximately 2
nautical miles (NM) to the east of the
present alignment (73 FR 9241). The
FAA proposed this change to ‘‘square
off’’ the corner to ensure that aircraft
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36871
conducting high altitude munitions
delivery training remain within the
confines of restricted airspace.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
In a separate action, on February 11,
2008, the FAA distributed a
nonrulemaking circular soliciting public
comment on a proposal to modify the
De Soto 1 and De Soto 2 MOAs and to
establish two new MOAs in order to
raise the upper altitude limit of the
MOA airspace at the Camp Shelby
Range up to but not including FL 180
(Airspace Study No. 08–ASW–09NR). In
the circular, the FAA proposed to
modify the De Soto 1 MOA boundary to
match the amended R–4401A/R–4401B
boundary and to change the De Soto 1
MOA ceiling to read ‘‘to but not
including 10,000 feet MSL.’’ The De
Soto 2 MOA altitude ceiling would be
changed to read ‘‘to but not including
5,000 feet MSL,’’ but the De Soto 2
boundary would not be changed.
In addition, two new MOAs were
proposed. The De Soto 3 MOA would
overlie De Soto 1 and would extend
from 10,000 feet MSL to but not
including FL 180; and the De Soto 4
would overlie De Soto 2 with altitudes
extending from 5,000 feet MSL to but
not including FL 180. The Air National
Guard (ANG) requested this change
because the current MOAs do not
provide sufficient altitudes to
accommodate aircrew training in longrange set-up and stand-off tactics.
Seven comments were received in
response to the NPRM and the circular.
Discussion of Comments
All of the commenters opposed the
proposed rulemaking. Most commenters
argued that the proposed airspace
expansions would adversely impact
civil aircraft operations in the area; and,
in particular, those aircraft transiting the
area via VOR Federal airways V–11 and
V–70. Since this is a small boundary
adjustment, with the expansion
extending into existing MOA airspace,
the FAA concluded the restricted area
boundary change is not expected to
impact air traffic in the area. Airways
V–11 and V–70 do extend through the
proposed expanded MOA airspace.
However, in response to the
comments, the configuration and
altitude structure of the MOAs have
been revised. Instead of one large MOA
(De Soto 4) overlying the entire Desoto
2 MOA, the proposed De Soto 4 MOA
airspace is split into two separate MOAs
(i.e., De Soto 4 and De Soto 5). The
Desoto 4 MOA will extend from 5,000
feet MSL to but not including FL 180
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
36872
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
and will overlie only the northern
portion of De Soto 2 (i.e., north of
airway V–70). The De Soto 5 MOA will
overlie the remaining part of De Soto 2
(which is traversed by V–70). Also, the
floor of the new De Soto 5 MOA is set
at 11,000 feet MSL instead of 5,000 feet
MSL. This creates a gap in MOA
airspace between 5,000 feet MSL and
11,000 feet MSL along V–70 allowing
uninhibited access to five IFR altitudes
along the airway. Additional steps to
further minimize potential impacts
include: Imposing time restrictions on
use of the De Soto 4 and De Soto 5
MOAs; the airspace will be subject to
recall for weather or civil air traffic; and
communications lines between Range
Control and the FAA controlling agency
(Houston ARTCC) are being added to
expedite coordination. These measures
are designed to facilitate real time use
of the airspace as well as improve civil
aviation access to the airspace when not
required for military training.
Several commenters suggested that
the range airspace be moved to another
location in the United States where
there is less air traffic. One commenter
added that the training could be
conducted over water in the existing
warning areas that are located less than
50 miles from the De Soto MOA
complex. Prior to submitting its airspace
proposal, the proponent did consider
alternative locations. However,
alternative sites were either already
saturated with test, evaluation, and
training activities and/or did not have
an associated air-to-ground bombing
range. A bombing range, containing an
array of target complexes, is required for
conducting realistic maneuvering for
actual and simulated ordnance delivery
training. Use of the off-shore warning
areas was judged to be unsuitable, in
part, due to the lack of the required
bombing range and the absence of
usable ground references over water.
Another option explored was to limit
the proposed MOA expansion to just the
De Soto 3 only. While this option would
allow some training activities to be
completed, it would not provide enough
airspace to contain training in tactics
requiring standoff distances that extend
beyond the current De Soto 1 MOA
boundary.
Differences From NPRM
The NPRM proposed a minor
expansion of the boundaries of
restricted areas R–4401A, R–4401B, and
R–4401C to move the southeastern
corner of the areas approximately 2 NM
to the east. However, in response to
public comments, and to provide for
better real time use of the airspace, the
FAA and the proponent decided to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
further stratify the restricted areas into
five sections instead of the original
three, while maintaining the current
restricted area altitude structure that
extends from the surface up to Flight
Level (FL) 290. In addition, the name of
the restricted area using agency is
updated to reflect the current
organization; and, the time of
designation for R–4401A, B and C is
simplified as described in ‘‘The Rule’’
section, below.
The NPRM did not include a
discussion of the De Soto MOA changes,
which are processed under
nonrulemaking procedures. However,
because the MOAs are an integral part
of the Camp Shelby Range airspace, the
FAA has included a discussion of these
changes in this rule.
Summary of De Soto MOA Changes
The existing De Soto 1 MOA is being
amended to adjust the boundaries to
match the revised southeast corner of
restricted areas R–4401A and R–4401B.
In addition, the altitude of the De Soto
1 MOA will be amended to read ‘‘500
feet AGL to but not including 10,000
feet MSL,’’ and the name of the using
agency is updated to reflect the current
organization title. The altitude of the De
Soto 2 MOA will be amended to read
‘‘100 feet AGL to but not including
5,000 feet MSL,’’ and the name of the
using agency is also updated. The
boundaries of the De Soto 2 MOA are
not being changed. Instead of
establishing two new MOAs as
originally proposed (i.e., De Soto 3 and
De Soto 4), three new MOAs will be
established (De Soto 3, 4 and 5). This
allows greater flexibility to facilitate real
time use of the airspace as well as
improve civil access to the airspace
when not required by the military. As
originally proposed, the De Soto 3
overlies the De Soto 1 MOA and extends
from 10,000 feet MSL to but not
including FL 180. However, the
proposed De Soto 4 MOA airspace is
revised so that, instead of overlying the
entire De Soto 2 MOA, it overlies only
the northern portion of De Soto 2 and
extends from 5,000 feet MSL up to but
not including FL 180. The new De Soto
5 MOA overlies the southern portion of
De Soto 2. In addition, the De Soto 5
MOA has a floor of 11,000 feet MSL and
extends up to but not including FL 180.
This creates a gap in MOA airspace
between the 5,000 foot MSL ceiling of
the De Soto 2 MOA and the 11,000 foot
MSL floor of the De Soto 5 MOA,
bracketing a portion of airway V–70.
This gap between De Soto 2 and De Soto
5 provides five IFR altitudes (i.e., from
6,000 feet MSL to 10,000 feet MSL
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
inclusive) along V–70 that are always
clear of MOA airspace.
The new MOA configuration allows
better real time use of the airspace so
that parts of the MOAs that are not
needed for the military mission can be
released for access by other users. These
measures lessen the potential impact on
other airspace users, and facilitate better
access to airways V–11 and V–70, which
pass through, or in the vicinity of, the
De Soto 2, 4 and 5 MOAs.
The above MOA changes will be
published in the NFDD.
The Rule
This rule amends 14 CFR part 73 by
modifying restricted areas R–4401A, R–
4401B, and R–4401C to ‘‘square off’’ the
southeast boundary of the areas, realign
the altitude structure of the restricted
airspace, update the using agency name,
and simplify the time of designation
statement. In addition, two new
restricted areas are designated: R–4401D
and R–4401E. These changes do not
alter the overall altitude limits of the
Camp Shelby restricted areas, which
remain as currently designated (i.e.,
from the surface to but not including
29,000 feet MSL). However, to
accommodate more flexible use of the
airspace and to lessen the potential
impact on other airspace users by
enabling parts of the area to be released
when not needed for the military
mission, the existing altitude structure
is divided into five subareas instead of
three. With these changes, the restricted
airspace at Camp Shelby, MS, consists
of: R–4401A, extending from the surface
to but not including 4,000 feet MSL; R–
4401B, extending from 4,000 feet MSL
to but not including 10,000 feet MSL; R–
4401C, extending from 10,000 feet MSL
to but not including FL 180; R–4401D,
extending from FL 180 to but not
including FL 230; and R–4401E,
extending from FL 230 to FL 290. All
five subareas share the same boundary
alignment. The time of designation for
R–4401A, B and C remains by NOTAM
at least 24 hours in advance, except that
the words ‘‘NOTAMS to contain
information concerning deactivation of
the area’’ are deleted from the
description. This statement is not
required because SUA NOTAMs
normally include the times when the
airspace is in effect.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this proposed
regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it modifies restricted airspace in the
vicinity of Camp Shelby, MS, to
enhance the safe and the efficient use of
the National Airspace System.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Environmental Review
In July 2008, the Air National Guard
(ANG) published a Final Environmental
Assessment (FEA) ‘‘Modification of
CRTC-Used Airspace: Combat Readiness
Training Center’’ and associated Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) dated
July 1, 2008. The ANG prepared the
FEA and associated FONSI in
compliance with their obligations under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and as specified in ANG
environmental regulations. The FAA
was a cooperating agency in the NEPA
process and provided input during the
ANG environmental process.
Additionally, in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 404d, the FAA has
independently evaluated the
information contained in the FEA and is
adopting the content that addresses
FAA actions pursuant to 40 CFR
1506.3(a) and (c) and has issued a
FONSI/Record of Decision (ROD) dated
May 2011. This final rule, which
modifies the Camp Shelby. MS,
restricted areas, will not result in
significant environmental impacts.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73
Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted
areas.
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 73 as follows:
PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 73.44
[Amended]
2. Section 73.44 is amended as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
1. R–4401A Camp Shelby, MS [Amended]
By removing the current boundaries,
altitudes, time of designation and using
agency and substituting the following:
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°12′55″ N.,
long. 89°11′03″ W.; to lat. 31°11′49″ N., long.
89°00′00″ W.; to lat. 31°10′16″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
89°11′00″ W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. Surface to but not
including 4,000 feet MSL.
Time of designation. By NOTAM at least
24 hours in advance.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp
Shelby, MS.
2. R–4401B Camp Shelby, MS [Amended]
By removing the current boundaries,
designated altitudes, time of designation and
using agency and substituting the following:
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°12′55″ N.,
long. 89°11′03″ W.; to lat. 31°11′49″ N., long.
89°00′00″ W.; to lat. 31°10′16″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
89°11′00″ W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. 4,000 feet MSL to but
not including 10,000 feet MSL.
Time of designation. By NOTAM at least
24 hours in advance.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp
Shelby, MS.
3. R–4401C Camp Shelby, MS [Amended]
By removing the current boundaries,
designated altitudes, time of designation and
using agency and substituting the following:
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°12′55″ N.,
long. 89°11′03″ W.; to lat. 31°11′49″ N., long.
89°00′00″ W.; to lat. 31°10′16″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
89°11′00″ W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. 10,000 feet MSL to
but not including FL 180.
Time of designation. By NOTAM at least
24 hours in advance.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp
Shelby, MS.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36873
4. R–4401D Camp Shelby, MS [New]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°12′55″ N.,
long. 89°11′03″ W.; to lat. 31°11′49″ N., long.
89°00′00″ W.; to lat. 31°10′16″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
89°11′00″ W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. FL 180 to but not
including FL 230.
Time of designation. By NOTAM 4 hours
in advance.
Controlling agency. FAA, Houston ARTCC.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp
Shelby, MS.
5. R–4401E
Camp Shelby, MS [New]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°12′55″ N.,
long. 89°11′03″ W.; to lat. 31°11′49″ N., long.
89°00′00″ W.; to lat. 31°10′16″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
88°56′34″ W.; to lat. 31°04′37″ N., long.
89°11′00″ W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. FL 230 to FL 290.
Time of designation. By NOTAM four
hours in advance.
Controlling agency. FAA, Houston ARTCC.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp
Shelby, MS.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 15,
2011.
Gary A. Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2011–15702 Filed 6–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–1036–201138; FRL–
9322–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality
Planning Purposes; Georgia: Atlanta;
Determination of Attainment for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
determine that the Atlanta, Georgia 1997
8-hour ozone nonattainment area has
attained the 1997 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
based on quality assured, quality
controlled monitoring data from 2008–
2010. The Atlanta, Georgia 1997 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area (hereafter
referred to as the ‘‘Atlanta Area’’ or ‘‘the
Area’’) is comprised of Barrow, Bartow,
Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb,
Coweta, Dekalb, Douglas, Fayette,
Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry,
Newton, Paulding, Rockdale, Spalding
and Walton Counties in Georgia. This
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36871-36873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15702]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0110; Airspace Docket No. 07-ASW-8]
RIN 2120-AA66
Modification of Restricted Areas R-4401A, R-4401B, and R-4401C;
Camp Shelby, MS
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action modifies restricted areas R-4401A, R-4401B, and R-
4401C, at Camp Shelby, MS, to ensure that aircraft remain within the
confines of restricted airspace during high altitude munitions delivery
and to enhance the efficient use of airspace in the vicinity of Camp
Shelby, MS.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, August 25, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace, Regulations
and ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Special Use Airspace (SUA) at Camp Shelby, MS, currently consists
of three restricted areas that are layered from the surface up to
29,000 feet MSL. Restricted area R-4401A extends from the surface up to
4,000 feet MSL; R-4401B overlies R-4401A and extends from 4,000 feet
MSL up to 18,000 feet MSL; R-4401C overlies A and B and extends from
18,000 feet MSL up to 29,000 feet MSL. Adjacent to the restricted areas
are two military operations areas (MOA). The De Soto 1 MOA abuts the
north, east and south sides of the restricted areas and extends from
500 feet AGL up to 10,000 feet MSL. The De Soto 2 MOA lies adjacent to
the east and south sides of De Soto 1 MOA and extends from 100 feet AGL
up to 5,000 feet MSL.
Military Operations Areas (MOA)
MOAs are nonregulatory airspace areas that are established
administratively and published in the National Flight Data Digest
(NFDD) rather than through rulemaking procedures. MOAs are established
to separate or segregate non-hazardous military flight activities from
aircraft operating in accordance with instrument flight rules (IFR),
and to advise pilots flying under visual flight rules (VFR) where these
activities are conducted. IFR aircraft may be routed through an active
MOA only by agreement with the using agency and only when air traffic
control can provide approved separation from the MOA activity. VFR
pilots are not restricted from flying in an active MOA, but they are
advised to exercise caution while doing so. Although MOAs are not
regulatory airspace actions, the De Soto MOAs are described in this
rule because they form an integral part of the Camp Shelby Range
airspace area. The MOA changes will be published separately in the
NFDD.
History
On Wednesday, February 20, 2008, the FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify Restricted
Areas R-4401A, R-4401B and R-4401C at Camp Shelby, MS, by moving the
southeastern corner of the restricted areas approximately 2 nautical
miles (NM) to the east of the present alignment (73 FR 9241). The FAA
proposed this change to ``square off'' the corner to ensure that
aircraft conducting high altitude munitions delivery training remain
within the confines of restricted airspace. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking proceeding by submitting
written comments on the proposal to the FAA.
In a separate action, on February 11, 2008, the FAA distributed a
nonrulemaking circular soliciting public comment on a proposal to
modify the De Soto 1 and De Soto 2 MOAs and to establish two new MOAs
in order to raise the upper altitude limit of the MOA airspace at the
Camp Shelby Range up to but not including FL 180 (Airspace Study No.
08-ASW-09NR). In the circular, the FAA proposed to modify the De Soto 1
MOA boundary to match the amended R-4401A/R-4401B boundary and to
change the De Soto 1 MOA ceiling to read ``to but not including 10,000
feet MSL.'' The De Soto 2 MOA altitude ceiling would be changed to read
``to but not including 5,000 feet MSL,'' but the De Soto 2 boundary
would not be changed.
In addition, two new MOAs were proposed. The De Soto 3 MOA would
overlie De Soto 1 and would extend from 10,000 feet MSL to but not
including FL 180; and the De Soto 4 would overlie De Soto 2 with
altitudes extending from 5,000 feet MSL to but not including FL 180.
The Air National Guard (ANG) requested this change because the current
MOAs do not provide sufficient altitudes to accommodate aircrew
training in long-range set-up and stand-off tactics.
Seven comments were received in response to the NPRM and the
circular.
Discussion of Comments
All of the commenters opposed the proposed rulemaking. Most
commenters argued that the proposed airspace expansions would adversely
impact civil aircraft operations in the area; and, in particular, those
aircraft transiting the area via VOR Federal airways V-11 and V-70.
Since this is a small boundary adjustment, with the expansion extending
into existing MOA airspace, the FAA concluded the restricted area
boundary change is not expected to impact air traffic in the area.
Airways V-11 and V-70 do extend through the proposed expanded MOA
airspace.
However, in response to the comments, the configuration and
altitude structure of the MOAs have been revised. Instead of one large
MOA (De Soto 4) overlying the entire Desoto 2 MOA, the proposed De Soto
4 MOA airspace is split into two separate MOAs (i.e., De Soto 4 and De
Soto 5). The Desoto 4 MOA will extend from 5,000 feet MSL to but not
including FL 180
[[Page 36872]]
and will overlie only the northern portion of De Soto 2 (i.e., north of
airway V-70). The De Soto 5 MOA will overlie the remaining part of De
Soto 2 (which is traversed by V-70). Also, the floor of the new De Soto
5 MOA is set at 11,000 feet MSL instead of 5,000 feet MSL. This creates
a gap in MOA airspace between 5,000 feet MSL and 11,000 feet MSL along
V-70 allowing uninhibited access to five IFR altitudes along the
airway. Additional steps to further minimize potential impacts include:
Imposing time restrictions on use of the De Soto 4 and De Soto 5 MOAs;
the airspace will be subject to recall for weather or civil air
traffic; and communications lines between Range Control and the FAA
controlling agency (Houston ARTCC) are being added to expedite
coordination. These measures are designed to facilitate real time use
of the airspace as well as improve civil aviation access to the
airspace when not required for military training.
Several commenters suggested that the range airspace be moved to
another location in the United States where there is less air traffic.
One commenter added that the training could be conducted over water in
the existing warning areas that are located less than 50 miles from the
De Soto MOA complex. Prior to submitting its airspace proposal, the
proponent did consider alternative locations. However, alternative
sites were either already saturated with test, evaluation, and training
activities and/or did not have an associated air-to-ground bombing
range. A bombing range, containing an array of target complexes, is
required for conducting realistic maneuvering for actual and simulated
ordnance delivery training. Use of the off-shore warning areas was
judged to be unsuitable, in part, due to the lack of the required
bombing range and the absence of usable ground references over water.
Another option explored was to limit the proposed MOA expansion to just
the De Soto 3 only. While this option would allow some training
activities to be completed, it would not provide enough airspace to
contain training in tactics requiring standoff distances that extend
beyond the current De Soto 1 MOA boundary.
Differences From NPRM
The NPRM proposed a minor expansion of the boundaries of restricted
areas R-4401A, R-4401B, and R-4401C to move the southeastern corner of
the areas approximately 2 NM to the east. However, in response to
public comments, and to provide for better real time use of the
airspace, the FAA and the proponent decided to further stratify the
restricted areas into five sections instead of the original three,
while maintaining the current restricted area altitude structure that
extends from the surface up to Flight Level (FL) 290. In addition, the
name of the restricted area using agency is updated to reflect the
current organization; and, the time of designation for R-4401A, B and C
is simplified as described in ``The Rule'' section, below.
The NPRM did not include a discussion of the De Soto MOA changes,
which are processed under nonrulemaking procedures. However, because
the MOAs are an integral part of the Camp Shelby Range airspace, the
FAA has included a discussion of these changes in this rule.
Summary of De Soto MOA Changes
The existing De Soto 1 MOA is being amended to adjust the
boundaries to match the revised southeast corner of restricted areas R-
4401A and R-4401B. In addition, the altitude of the De Soto 1 MOA will
be amended to read ``500 feet AGL to but not including 10,000 feet
MSL,'' and the name of the using agency is updated to reflect the
current organization title. The altitude of the De Soto 2 MOA will be
amended to read ``100 feet AGL to but not including 5,000 feet MSL,''
and the name of the using agency is also updated. The boundaries of the
De Soto 2 MOA are not being changed. Instead of establishing two new
MOAs as originally proposed (i.e., De Soto 3 and De Soto 4), three new
MOAs will be established (De Soto 3, 4 and 5). This allows greater
flexibility to facilitate real time use of the airspace as well as
improve civil access to the airspace when not required by the military.
As originally proposed, the De Soto 3 overlies the De Soto 1 MOA and
extends from 10,000 feet MSL to but not including FL 180. However, the
proposed De Soto 4 MOA airspace is revised so that, instead of
overlying the entire De Soto 2 MOA, it overlies only the northern
portion of De Soto 2 and extends from 5,000 feet MSL up to but not
including FL 180. The new De Soto 5 MOA overlies the southern portion
of De Soto 2. In addition, the De Soto 5 MOA has a floor of 11,000 feet
MSL and extends up to but not including FL 180. This creates a gap in
MOA airspace between the 5,000 foot MSL ceiling of the De Soto 2 MOA
and the 11,000 foot MSL floor of the De Soto 5 MOA, bracketing a
portion of airway V-70. This gap between De Soto 2 and De Soto 5
provides five IFR altitudes (i.e., from 6,000 feet MSL to 10,000 feet
MSL inclusive) along V-70 that are always clear of MOA airspace.
The new MOA configuration allows better real time use of the
airspace so that parts of the MOAs that are not needed for the military
mission can be released for access by other users. These measures
lessen the potential impact on other airspace users, and facilitate
better access to airways V-11 and V-70, which pass through, or in the
vicinity of, the De Soto 2, 4 and 5 MOAs.
The above MOA changes will be published in the NFDD.
The Rule
This rule amends 14 CFR part 73 by modifying restricted areas R-
4401A, R-4401B, and R-4401C to ``square off'' the southeast boundary of
the areas, realign the altitude structure of the restricted airspace,
update the using agency name, and simplify the time of designation
statement. In addition, two new restricted areas are designated: R-
4401D and R-4401E. These changes do not alter the overall altitude
limits of the Camp Shelby restricted areas, which remain as currently
designated (i.e., from the surface to but not including 29,000 feet
MSL). However, to accommodate more flexible use of the airspace and to
lessen the potential impact on other airspace users by enabling parts
of the area to be released when not needed for the military mission,
the existing altitude structure is divided into five subareas instead
of three. With these changes, the restricted airspace at Camp Shelby,
MS, consists of: R-4401A, extending from the surface to but not
including 4,000 feet MSL; R-4401B, extending from 4,000 feet MSL to but
not including 10,000 feet MSL; R-4401C, extending from 10,000 feet MSL
to but not including FL 180; R-4401D, extending from FL 180 to but not
including FL 230; and R-4401E, extending from FL 230 to FL 290. All
five subareas share the same boundary alignment. The time of
designation for R-4401A, B and C remains by NOTAM at least 24 hours in
advance, except that the words ``NOTAMS to contain information
concerning deactivation of the area'' are deleted from the description.
This statement is not required because SUA NOTAMs normally include the
times when the airspace is in effect.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant
[[Page 36873]]
rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies restricted airspace in the vicinity of Camp Shelby, MS,
to enhance the safe and the efficient use of the National Airspace
System.
Environmental Review
In July 2008, the Air National Guard (ANG) published a Final
Environmental Assessment (FEA) ``Modification of CRTC-Used Airspace:
Combat Readiness Training Center'' and associated Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) dated July 1, 2008. The ANG prepared the FEA
and associated FONSI in compliance with their obligations under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and as specified in ANG
environmental regulations. The FAA was a cooperating agency in the NEPA
process and provided input during the ANG environmental process.
Additionally, in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,'' paragraph 404d, the FAA has
independently evaluated the information contained in the FEA and is
adopting the content that addresses FAA actions pursuant to 40 CFR
1506.3(a) and (c) and has issued a FONSI/Record of Decision (ROD) dated
May 2011. This final rule, which modifies the Camp Shelby. MS,
restricted areas, will not result in significant environmental impacts.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73
Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas.
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 73 as follows:
PART 73--SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 73.44 [Amended]
0
2. Section 73.44 is amended as follows:
* * * * *
1. R-4401A Camp Shelby, MS [Amended]
By removing the current boundaries, altitudes, time of
designation and using agency and substituting the following:
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31[deg]12'55'' N., long.
89[deg]11'03'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]11'49'' N., long. 89[deg]00'00''
W.; to lat. 31[deg]10'16'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat.
31[deg]04'37'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]04'37''
N., long. 89[deg]11'00'' W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. Surface to but not including 4,000 feet
MSL.
Time of designation. By NOTAM at least 24 hours in advance.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp Shelby, MS.
2. R-4401B Camp Shelby, MS [Amended]
By removing the current boundaries, designated altitudes, time
of designation and using agency and substituting the following:
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31[deg]12'55'' N., long.
89[deg]11'03'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]11'49'' N., long. 89[deg]00'00''
W.; to lat. 31[deg]10'16'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat.
31[deg]04'37'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]04'37''
N., long. 89[deg]11'00'' W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. 4,000 feet MSL to but not including 10,000
feet MSL.
Time of designation. By NOTAM at least 24 hours in advance.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp Shelby, MS.
3. R-4401C Camp Shelby, MS [Amended]
By removing the current boundaries, designated altitudes, time
of designation and using agency and substituting the following:
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31[deg]12'55'' N., long.
89[deg]11'03'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]11'49'' N., long. 89[deg]00'00''
W.; to lat. 31[deg]10'16'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat.
31[deg]04'37'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]04'37''
N., long. 89[deg]11'00'' W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. 10,000 feet MSL to but not including FL
180.
Time of designation. By NOTAM at least 24 hours in advance.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp Shelby, MS.
4. R-4401D Camp Shelby, MS [New]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31[deg]12'55'' N., long.
89[deg]11'03'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]11'49'' N., long. 89[deg]00'00''
W.; to lat. 31[deg]10'16'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat.
31[deg]04'37'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]04'37''
N., long. 89[deg]11'00'' W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. FL 180 to but not including FL 230.
Time of designation. By NOTAM 4 hours in advance.
Controlling agency. FAA, Houston ARTCC.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp Shelby, MS.
5. R-4401E Camp Shelby, MS [New]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31[deg]12'55'' N., long.
89[deg]11'03'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]11'49'' N., long. 89[deg]00'00''
W.; to lat. 31[deg]10'16'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat.
31[deg]04'37'' N., long. 88[deg]56'34'' W.; to lat. 31[deg]04'37''
N., long. 89[deg]11'00'' W.; to the point of beginning.
Designated altitudes. FL 230 to FL 290.
Time of designation. By NOTAM four hours in advance.
Controlling agency. FAA, Houston ARTCC.
Using agency. Commanding Officer, Camp Shelby, MS.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 15, 2011.
Gary A. Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2011-15702 Filed 6-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P