Mango Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Reapportionment, 36281-36283 [2011-15630]
Download as PDF
36281
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 120
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1206
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0092]
Mango Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Reapportionment
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule reduces the number
of National Mango Board (Board)
members from 20 to 18 to reflect the
elimination of two non-voting
wholesaler/retailer positions. In
accordance with the Mango Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
(Order), which is authorized under the
Commodity Promotion, Research, and
Information Act of 1996 (Act), a review
of the composition of the Board must be
conducted every five years. The Board
reviewed the production volumes and
geographical distribution of domestic
and imported mangos, and submitted
this information to the U.S. Department
of Agriculture with a recommendation
that no changes be made to the number
of importer, first handler, or producer
seats on the Board. However, the Board
recommended elimination of two nonvoting wholesaler/retailer positions that
have not been filled since 2007.
DATES: Effective Date: June 23, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Veronica Douglass, Marketing
Specialist, Research and Promotion
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Stop 0244, Room 0632–S, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone:
888–720–9917; fax: 202–205–2800; or
e-mail:
veronica.douglass@ams.usda.gov.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:22 Jun 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
This rule
is issued under the Mango Promotion,
Research, and Consumer Information
Order (Order) [7 CFR part 1206]. The
Order is authorized by the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (Act) [7 U.S.C. 7411–7425].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has waived the review process
required by Executive Order 12866 for
this action.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. It is not intended to have a
retroactive effect.
Section 524 of the Act provides that
the Act shall not affect or preempt any
other State or Federal law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
Under the Act, a person subject to an
order may file a petition with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (Department)
stating that an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not
established in accordance with the law,
and requesting a modification of an
order or an exemption from an order.
Any petition filed challenging an order,
any provision of an order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
an order, shall be filed within two years
after the effective date of an order,
provision, or obligation subject to
challenge in the petition. The petitioner
will have the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. Thereafter, the
Department will issue a ruling on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States for
any district in which the petitioner
resides or conducts business shall have
the jurisdiction to review a final ruling
on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later
than 20 days after the date of the entry
of the Department’s final ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–
612), the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic
impact of this rule on small entities that
would be affected by this rule. The
purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory
action to scale on businesses subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
such action, so that small businesses
will not be disproportionately
burdened.
The Small Business Administration
defines small agricultural producers as
those having annual receipts of no more
than $750,000, and small agricultural
service firms as those having annual
receipts of no more than $7 million (13
CFR part 121). First handlers, importers,
wholesalers, and retailers would be
considered agricultural service firms.
Currently, fewer than five first handlers
and 193 importers are subject to
assessment under the Order. The
majority of producers would be
considered small businesses. The
majority of these first handlers and
importers would be considered small
businesses, while wholesalers and
retailers would not.
First handlers and importers who
market or import less than 500,000
pounds of mangos annually are exempt
from the assessment. Mangos that are
exported out of the United States are
also exempt from assessment. In
addition, domestic producers, foreign
producers, wholesalers, and retailers are
not subject to assessment under the
Order, but such individuals are eligible
to serve on the Board along with
importers and first handlers.
Section 1206.30(c) of the Order
requires that the Board review the
volume and geographical distribution of
mango production and imports at least
once every five years. If warranted, the
Board will recommend to the
Department that membership on the
Board be altered to reflect any changes
in the volume and geographical
distribution of mango production and
imports.
The Order currently provides for a
Board of 20 members including eight
importers, one first handler, two
domestic producers, seven foreign
producers, and two non-voting
wholesalers and/or retailers. At its
November 16, 2010 meeting, the Board
reviewed the volume and geographic
distribution of mango production and
imports from 2006 through 2009. Based
on data from U.S. Customs and Border
Patrol, the volume of mango imports to
the U.S. declined from 666,772,761
pounds in 2006 to 627,271,605 pounds
in 2009. The Board’s eight importer
seats are allocated based on the volume
of mangos imported into each of the
four Districts defined in the Order. The
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
36282
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
current allocation is two seats for
District I, three seats for District II, two
seats for District III, and one seat for
District IV. The percentage of the total
mango import volume imported into
District I remained at 25 percent from
2006 to 2009. Imports into District II
grew from 35 percent of the total in
2006 to 41 percent in 2009. Imports into
District III fell from 28 percent of the
total in 2006 to 23 percent in 2009.
Imports into District IV fell from 12
percent of the total in 2006 to 11 percent
in 2009. Much of the domestic mango
production was adversely affected by
hurricanes during the early 2000s.
Accordingly, data provided by the
Board shows that in 2006, no
assessments were collected on domestic
mangos, while in 2009 assessments
were collected on 1,539,306 pounds of
domestic mangos. After reviewing the
data regarding mango imports and
domestic production, the Board voted to
recommend that no changes be made at
this time to the number of importer, first
handler, domestic producer, or foreign
producer seats; or to the allocation of
importer seats among the four districts.
At the same meeting, the Board voted
to request elimination of the wholesaler/
retailer positions from the Order. These
positions were included so that the
Board would include members with
direct customer sales experience. The
Board has made numerous attempts to
nominate individuals to those positions;
however, wholesalers and retailers are
not interested in or do not have the time
to serve on the Board. As a result, the
two wholesaler/retailer positions have
been vacant since 2008. These two
positions do not represent assessment
payers. If the wholesaler/retailer
positions are eliminated, the Board
would consist of a total of 18 members
including eight importers, one first
handler, two domestic producers, and
seven foreign producers.
Nominations and appointments to the
Board are conducted pursuant to
sections 1206.31 and 1206.33 of the
Order. Appointments to the Board are
made by the Secretary from a slate of
nominated candidates. Pursuant to
section 1206.31 of the Order, candidates
for the importer, first handler, and
domestic producer positions are
nominated by their peers. Nominations
for the foreign producer positions are
solicited from foreign mango producer
organizations. The Board nominates the
wholesaler/retailer members. The Order
requires that two nominees be
submitted for each vacant position.
In accordance with OMB regulation
[5 CFR part 1320], which implements
information collection requirements
imposed by the Paperwork Reduction
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:22 Jun 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.],
there are no new requirements
contained in this rule. In fact, a decrease
of 0.33 hours per year in the information
collection burden for the mango
program is expected. The information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB under
OMB control number 0581–0093.
The Department has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Background
The Order, which became effective
November 3, 2004, is authorized under
the Act and administered by the Board.
The Order provides for a 20-member
Board consisting of eight importers, one
first handler, two domestic producers,
seven foreign producers, and two nonvoting wholesalers and/or retailers.
Under the Order, the Board
administers a nationally coordinated
program of promotion, research, and
information designed to strengthen the
position of mangos in the marketplace
and to develop, maintain, and expand
the demand for mangos in the United
States. The program is financed by an
assessment of 1⁄2 cent per pound on first
handlers and importers who market or
import 500,000 pounds or more of
mangos annually. Under the Order, first
handlers remit assessments directly to
the Board, and assessments paid by
importers are collected and remitted by
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol.
Pursuant to section 1206.30(c) of the
Order, at least once in each five-year
period, the Board shall review the
volume and geographical distribution of
mango production and imports and, if
warranted, make a recommendation to
the Secretary to alter the Board’s
membership. On November 16, 2010, at
its fall meeting, the Board voted to
recommend that no changes be made to
the importer, first handler, domestic
producer, or foreign producer positions,
but that the non-voting wholesaler/
retailer positions be eliminated. If the
wholesaler/retailer positions are
eliminated, the Board’s membership
will be reduced from 20 to 18.
Accordingly, this action will amend
the Order by removing the definition of
retailer in section 1206.19, the
definition of wholesaler in section
1206.24, and references to wholesalers
and/or retailers in sections 1206.31 and
1206.32.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on March 14, 2011 [76 FR
13530]. Copies of the proposed rule
were made available on the Internet by
the Department and the Office of the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Register. In addition, AMS
published a press release announcing
the comment period. The proposed rule
provided a 30-day comment period,
which ended April 13, 2011. Twelve
comments were received by the
deadline.
Summary of Comments
In response to the proposed rule,
USDA received 12 comments regarding
the proposed amendment of the Order
to eliminate two non-voting wholesaler/
retailer positions on the Board. Of the
12 comments received, nine supported
the proposed amendment and three did
not support the proposed amendment.
A total of eight comments in support
of the proposed amendment discussed
the Board’s reasons for requesting
elimination of the wholesaler/retailer
positions. Seven of the comments cited
the potential for conflict of interest
created by participation of wholesalers
and/or retailers in Board meetings
where decisions could be influenced by
their business interests with individual
Board members.
Five comments in favor of the
proposed amendment mentioned the
Board’s retention of retail account
managers who gather input from the
retail sector and help the Board to
develop appropriate programs. These
commenters stated that having a
dedicated team of retail account
managers is an effective means of
communicating with wholesalers and
retailers.
Five comments expressed support for
the elimination of the wholesaler/
retailer positions on the basis that input
from wholesalers and/or retailers can be
obtained as needed through their ad hoc
participation on the Board’s committees.
The Board’s bylaws permit the Board’s
chairman to appoint committees that
may include persons other than Board
members. Subject to Board approval,
committee chairmen are also permitted
to appoint committee members who are
not Board members.
Four commenters supported
elimination of the wholesaler/retailer
positions, stating that past wholesaler/
retailer members struggled with the time
and travel demands of Board
membership and rarely attended Board
meetings.
Three comments in favor of the
proposed amendment stated that the
funds used to service the wholesaler/
retailer positions would be better spent
on the Board’s promotional programs.
One commenter agreed with the
proposed rule without providing
additional explanation.
Two commenters expressed
opposition to the notion that
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
representation on the Board is linked to
the payment of assessments. The Order
requires a review of the composition of
the Board to be conducted every five
years and states that the review is to be
based on Board assessment records and
statistics from USDA. The number of
importer, first handler, and domestic
producer seats, as well as the
distribution of importer seats, is
adjusted as needed based on the volume
and geographic distribution of mango
production and imports. In addition, the
volume of imports for each country of
origin is considered in appointments of
foreign producer members. Because the
volume handled or imported is linked to
the value of assessments received by the
Board, representation of importers, first
handlers, domestic producers and
foreign producers is necessarily linked
to the payment of assessments.
However, that is not the case for the
wholesaler/retailer positions.
Two commenters expressed
opposition to the proposed elimination
of the wholesaler/retailer positions on
the grounds that wholesalers and/or
retailers could provide valuable insight
to the Board. As stated above, the
Board’s bylaws permit the participation
of non-members on the Board’s
committees. Thus the Board is able to
seek input from wholesalers and/or
retailers as needed.
One commenter expressed doubt that
the Board has made sufficient efforts to
secure nominees to fill the wholesaler/
retailer positions. As discussed in the
proposed rule, the Board has made
numerous attempts to nominate
individuals to those positions; however,
wholesalers and retailers are either not
interested in or do not have the time to
serve on the Board.
One commenter recommended that
wholesalers and/or retailers be given
full voting rights on the Board. The
question of whether or not wholesaler/
retailer members should be permitted to
vote is not considered in this rule as it
is not relevant given the Board’s
inability to find wholesalers and/or
retailers to serve on the Board. The same
commenter also suggested that the
Board consider adding consumer
members. Currently, all Board meetings
are open to the public, and any person
has the opportunity to contact the Board
at any time. As such, consumer
participation in Board activities does
not require amendment of the Order.
One comment objecting to the
regulation of mangos was outside the
scope of this rule.
The Department has considered all of
the comments and is not making any
changes to the proposed rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:22 Jun 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, the Board’s
recommendation, public comments and
other information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as published in the
Federal Register [76 FR 13530] on
March 14, 2011, is consistent with and
will effectuate the purpose of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1206
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements,
Mango Promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 1206 is amended
as follows:
PART 1206—MANGO PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
ORDER
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1206 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425 and
7 U.S.C. 7401.
■
2. Remove and reserve § 1206.19.
§ 1206.19
■
[Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve § 1206.24.
§ 1206.24
[Reserved]
4. Amend § 1206.30 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 1206.30 Establishment of the National
Mango Promotion Board.
(a) Establishment of the National
Mango Promotion Board. There is
hereby established a National Mango
Promotion Board composed of eight
importers, one first handler, two
domestic producers, and seven foreign
producers. The chairperson shall reside
in the United States and the Board office
shall also be located in the United
States.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 1206.31 by removing
paragraph (h), and redesignating
paragraph (i) as paragraph (h).
■ 6. Revise § 1206.32 to read as follows:
§ 1206.32
Term of office.
The term of office for first handler,
importer, domestic producer, and
foreign producer members of the Board
will be three years, and these members
may serve a maximum of two
consecutive three-year terms. When the
Board is first established, the first
handler, two importers, one domestic
producer, and two foreign producers
will be assigned initial terms of four
years; three importers, one domestic
producer, and two foreign producers
will be assigned initial terms of three
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36283
years; and three importers and three
foreign producers will be assigned
initial terms of two years. Thereafter,
each of these positions will carry a full
three-year term. Members serving initial
terms of two or four years will be
eligible to serve a second term of three
years. Each term of office will end on
December 31, with new terms of office
beginning on January 1.
Dated: June 16, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–15630 Filed 6–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0259; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–196–AD; Amendment
39–16730; AD 2011–13–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Aviation Model FALCON 7X Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to the products listed above.
This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
Several occurrences of untimely radioaltimeter lock-up have been reported, where
the failed radio-altimeter indicated a negative
distance to the ground despite the aircraft
was flying at medium or high altitude.
A locked radio-altimeter #1 leads to
untimely inhibition of warnings that could be
displayed along with certain abnormal
conditions while the avionic system switches
into landing mode during altitude cruise.
*
*
*
*
*
[Untimely radio altimeter lock-up] may
cause the crew to be unaware of possible
system failures that could require urgent
crew’s actions.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
27, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM
22JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36281-36283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15630]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 22, 2011 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 36281]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1206
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-0092]
Mango Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Reapportionment
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule reduces the number of National Mango Board (Board)
members from 20 to 18 to reflect the elimination of two non-voting
wholesaler/retailer positions. In accordance with the Mango Promotion,
Research, and Information Order (Order), which is authorized under the
Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (Act), a
review of the composition of the Board must be conducted every five
years. The Board reviewed the production volumes and geographical
distribution of domestic and imported mangos, and submitted this
information to the U.S. Department of Agriculture with a recommendation
that no changes be made to the number of importer, first handler, or
producer seats on the Board. However, the Board recommended elimination
of two non-voting wholesaler/retailer positions that have not been
filled since 2007.
DATES: Effective Date: June 23, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Veronica Douglass, Marketing
Specialist, Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 0244, Room 0632-S,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0244; telephone:
888-720-9917; fax: 202-205-2800; or e-mail:
veronica.douglass@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under the Mango
Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order (Order) [7 CFR part
1206]. The Order is authorized by the Commodity Promotion, Research,
and Information Act of 1996 (Act) [7 U.S.C. 7411-7425].
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has waived the review
process required by Executive Order 12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have a retroactive effect.
Section 524 of the Act provides that the Act shall not affect or
preempt any other State or Federal law authorizing promotion or
research relating to an agricultural commodity.
Under the Act, a person subject to an order may file a petition
with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Department) stating that an
order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the
law, and requesting a modification of an order or an exemption from an
order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be
filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision,
or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, the
Department will issue a ruling on the petition. The Act provides that
the district court of the United States for any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of the Department's final ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities that would be affected
by this rule. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory action to
scale on businesses subject to such action, so that small businesses
will not be disproportionately burdened.
The Small Business Administration defines small agricultural
producers as those having annual receipts of no more than $750,000, and
small agricultural service firms as those having annual receipts of no
more than $7 million (13 CFR part 121). First handlers, importers,
wholesalers, and retailers would be considered agricultural service
firms. Currently, fewer than five first handlers and 193 importers are
subject to assessment under the Order. The majority of producers would
be considered small businesses. The majority of these first handlers
and importers would be considered small businesses, while wholesalers
and retailers would not.
First handlers and importers who market or import less than 500,000
pounds of mangos annually are exempt from the assessment. Mangos that
are exported out of the United States are also exempt from assessment.
In addition, domestic producers, foreign producers, wholesalers, and
retailers are not subject to assessment under the Order, but such
individuals are eligible to serve on the Board along with importers and
first handlers.
Section 1206.30(c) of the Order requires that the Board review the
volume and geographical distribution of mango production and imports at
least once every five years. If warranted, the Board will recommend to
the Department that membership on the Board be altered to reflect any
changes in the volume and geographical distribution of mango production
and imports.
The Order currently provides for a Board of 20 members including
eight importers, one first handler, two domestic producers, seven
foreign producers, and two non-voting wholesalers and/or retailers. At
its November 16, 2010 meeting, the Board reviewed the volume and
geographic distribution of mango production and imports from 2006
through 2009. Based on data from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, the
volume of mango imports to the U.S. declined from 666,772,761 pounds in
2006 to 627,271,605 pounds in 2009. The Board's eight importer seats
are allocated based on the volume of mangos imported into each of the
four Districts defined in the Order. The
[[Page 36282]]
current allocation is two seats for District I, three seats for
District II, two seats for District III, and one seat for District IV.
The percentage of the total mango import volume imported into District
I remained at 25 percent from 2006 to 2009. Imports into District II
grew from 35 percent of the total in 2006 to 41 percent in 2009.
Imports into District III fell from 28 percent of the total in 2006 to
23 percent in 2009. Imports into District IV fell from 12 percent of
the total in 2006 to 11 percent in 2009. Much of the domestic mango
production was adversely affected by hurricanes during the early 2000s.
Accordingly, data provided by the Board shows that in 2006, no
assessments were collected on domestic mangos, while in 2009
assessments were collected on 1,539,306 pounds of domestic mangos.
After reviewing the data regarding mango imports and domestic
production, the Board voted to recommend that no changes be made at
this time to the number of importer, first handler, domestic producer,
or foreign producer seats; or to the allocation of importer seats among
the four districts.
At the same meeting, the Board voted to request elimination of the
wholesaler/retailer positions from the Order. These positions were
included so that the Board would include members with direct customer
sales experience. The Board has made numerous attempts to nominate
individuals to those positions; however, wholesalers and retailers are
not interested in or do not have the time to serve on the Board. As a
result, the two wholesaler/retailer positions have been vacant since
2008. These two positions do not represent assessment payers. If the
wholesaler/retailer positions are eliminated, the Board would consist
of a total of 18 members including eight importers, one first handler,
two domestic producers, and seven foreign producers.
Nominations and appointments to the Board are conducted pursuant to
sections 1206.31 and 1206.33 of the Order. Appointments to the Board
are made by the Secretary from a slate of nominated candidates.
Pursuant to section 1206.31 of the Order, candidates for the importer,
first handler, and domestic producer positions are nominated by their
peers. Nominations for the foreign producer positions are solicited
from foreign mango producer organizations. The Board nominates the
wholesaler/retailer members. The Order requires that two nominees be
submitted for each vacant position.
In accordance with OMB regulation [5 CFR part 1320], which
implements information collection requirements imposed by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.], there are no new
requirements contained in this rule. In fact, a decrease of 0.33 hours
per year in the information collection burden for the mango program is
expected. The information collection requirements have been previously
approved by OMB under OMB control number 0581-0093.
The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Background
The Order, which became effective November 3, 2004, is authorized
under the Act and administered by the Board. The Order provides for a
20-member Board consisting of eight importers, one first handler, two
domestic producers, seven foreign producers, and two non-voting
wholesalers and/or retailers.
Under the Order, the Board administers a nationally coordinated
program of promotion, research, and information designed to strengthen
the position of mangos in the marketplace and to develop, maintain, and
expand the demand for mangos in the United States. The program is
financed by an assessment of \1/2\ cent per pound on first handlers and
importers who market or import 500,000 pounds or more of mangos
annually. Under the Order, first handlers remit assessments directly to
the Board, and assessments paid by importers are collected and remitted
by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol.
Pursuant to section 1206.30(c) of the Order, at least once in each
five-year period, the Board shall review the volume and geographical
distribution of mango production and imports and, if warranted, make a
recommendation to the Secretary to alter the Board's membership. On
November 16, 2010, at its fall meeting, the Board voted to recommend
that no changes be made to the importer, first handler, domestic
producer, or foreign producer positions, but that the non-voting
wholesaler/retailer positions be eliminated. If the wholesaler/retailer
positions are eliminated, the Board's membership will be reduced from
20 to 18.
Accordingly, this action will amend the Order by removing the
definition of retailer in section 1206.19, the definition of wholesaler
in section 1206.24, and references to wholesalers and/or retailers in
sections 1206.31 and 1206.32.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on March 14, 2011 [76 FR 13530]. Copies of the proposed rule
were made available on the Internet by the Department and the Office of
the Federal Register. In addition, AMS published a press release
announcing the comment period. The proposed rule provided a 30-day
comment period, which ended April 13, 2011. Twelve comments were
received by the deadline.
Summary of Comments
In response to the proposed rule, USDA received 12 comments
regarding the proposed amendment of the Order to eliminate two non-
voting wholesaler/retailer positions on the Board. Of the 12 comments
received, nine supported the proposed amendment and three did not
support the proposed amendment.
A total of eight comments in support of the proposed amendment
discussed the Board's reasons for requesting elimination of the
wholesaler/retailer positions. Seven of the comments cited the
potential for conflict of interest created by participation of
wholesalers and/or retailers in Board meetings where decisions could be
influenced by their business interests with individual Board members.
Five comments in favor of the proposed amendment mentioned the
Board's retention of retail account managers who gather input from the
retail sector and help the Board to develop appropriate programs. These
commenters stated that having a dedicated team of retail account
managers is an effective means of communicating with wholesalers and
retailers.
Five comments expressed support for the elimination of the
wholesaler/retailer positions on the basis that input from wholesalers
and/or retailers can be obtained as needed through their ad hoc
participation on the Board's committees. The Board's bylaws permit the
Board's chairman to appoint committees that may include persons other
than Board members. Subject to Board approval, committee chairmen are
also permitted to appoint committee members who are not Board members.
Four commenters supported elimination of the wholesaler/retailer
positions, stating that past wholesaler/retailer members struggled with
the time and travel demands of Board membership and rarely attended
Board meetings.
Three comments in favor of the proposed amendment stated that the
funds used to service the wholesaler/retailer positions would be better
spent on the Board's promotional programs.
One commenter agreed with the proposed rule without providing
additional explanation.
Two commenters expressed opposition to the notion that
[[Page 36283]]
representation on the Board is linked to the payment of assessments.
The Order requires a review of the composition of the Board to be
conducted every five years and states that the review is to be based on
Board assessment records and statistics from USDA. The number of
importer, first handler, and domestic producer seats, as well as the
distribution of importer seats, is adjusted as needed based on the
volume and geographic distribution of mango production and imports. In
addition, the volume of imports for each country of origin is
considered in appointments of foreign producer members. Because the
volume handled or imported is linked to the value of assessments
received by the Board, representation of importers, first handlers,
domestic producers and foreign producers is necessarily linked to the
payment of assessments. However, that is not the case for the
wholesaler/retailer positions.
Two commenters expressed opposition to the proposed elimination of
the wholesaler/retailer positions on the grounds that wholesalers and/
or retailers could provide valuable insight to the Board. As stated
above, the Board's bylaws permit the participation of non-members on
the Board's committees. Thus the Board is able to seek input from
wholesalers and/or retailers as needed.
One commenter expressed doubt that the Board has made sufficient
efforts to secure nominees to fill the wholesaler/retailer positions.
As discussed in the proposed rule, the Board has made numerous attempts
to nominate individuals to those positions; however, wholesalers and
retailers are either not interested in or do not have the time to serve
on the Board.
One commenter recommended that wholesalers and/or retailers be
given full voting rights on the Board. The question of whether or not
wholesaler/retailer members should be permitted to vote is not
considered in this rule as it is not relevant given the Board's
inability to find wholesalers and/or retailers to serve on the Board.
The same commenter also suggested that the Board consider adding
consumer members. Currently, all Board meetings are open to the public,
and any person has the opportunity to contact the Board at any time. As
such, consumer participation in Board activities does not require
amendment of the Order.
One comment objecting to the regulation of mangos was outside the
scope of this rule.
The Department has considered all of the comments and is not making
any changes to the proposed rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, the Board's
recommendation, public comments and other information, it is hereby
found that this rule, as published in the Federal Register [76 FR
13530] on March 14, 2011, is consistent with and will effectuate the
purpose of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1206
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements, Mango Promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1206 is
amended as follows:
PART 1206--MANGO PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ORDER
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1206 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. Remove and reserve Sec. 1206.19.
Sec. 1206.19 [Reserved]
0
3. Remove and reserve Sec. 1206.24.
Sec. 1206.24 [Reserved]
0
4. Amend Sec. 1206.30 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1206.30 Establishment of the National Mango Promotion Board.
(a) Establishment of the National Mango Promotion Board. There is
hereby established a National Mango Promotion Board composed of eight
importers, one first handler, two domestic producers, and seven foreign
producers. The chairperson shall reside in the United States and the
Board office shall also be located in the United States.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 1206.31 by removing paragraph (h), and redesignating
paragraph (i) as paragraph (h).
0
6. Revise Sec. 1206.32 to read as follows:
Sec. 1206.32 Term of office.
The term of office for first handler, importer, domestic producer,
and foreign producer members of the Board will be three years, and
these members may serve a maximum of two consecutive three-year terms.
When the Board is first established, the first handler, two importers,
one domestic producer, and two foreign producers will be assigned
initial terms of four years; three importers, one domestic producer,
and two foreign producers will be assigned initial terms of three
years; and three importers and three foreign producers will be assigned
initial terms of two years. Thereafter, each of these positions will
carry a full three-year term. Members serving initial terms of two or
four years will be eligible to serve a second term of three years. Each
term of office will end on December 31, with new terms of office
beginning on January 1.
Dated: June 16, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-15630 Filed 6-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P