Onions Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, OR; Modification of Handling Regulations, 35997-36000 [2011-15445]
Download as PDF
35997
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 119
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 958
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0025; FV11–958–1
PR]
Onions Grown in Certain Designated
Counties in Idaho, and Malheur
County, OR; Modification of Handling
Regulations
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This rule invites comments
on revisions to the handling regulation
for onions handled under the IdahoEastern Oregon onion marketing order.
The marketing order regulates the
handling of onions grown in designated
counties in Idaho, and Malheur County,
Oregon, and is administered locally by
the Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onion
Committee (Committee). This rule
would revise the marketing order’s
handling regulation to allow special
purpose shipments of onions for
experimentation. The revision would
allow the Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion
industry to identify and develop new
market niches and is expected to benefit
producers, handlers, and consumers of
onions. This proposal also announces
the Agricultural Marketing Service’s
(AMS) intent to request a revision of the
currently approved information
collection requirements under the order.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jun 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this rule will
be included in the record and will be
made available to the public. Please be
advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry Broadbent or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 805 SW., Broadway, Suite
930, Portland, OR 97205; Telephone:
(503) 326–2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or
E-mail: Barry.Broadbent@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 130 and Marketing Order No. 958,
both as amended (7 CFR part 958),
regulating the handling of onions grown
in certain designated counties in Idaho,
and Malheur County, Oregon,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
§ 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler
subject to an order may file with USDA
a petition stating that the order, any
provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is
not in accordance with law and request
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a modification of the order or to be
exempted therefrom. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule invites comments
on revisions to the handling regulation
for onions handled under the order.
Specifically, this rule would revise the
handling regulation to allow special
purpose shipments of onions for the
purpose of experimentation without
regard to the minimum grade, size,
maturity, pack, and inspection
requirements of the order. The revision
would give the Idaho-Eastern Oregon
onion industry the opportunity to
identify and develop new markets. The
changes are expected to benefit
producers, handlers, and consumers of
onions. This rule was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at its
January 20, 2011, meeting.
Sections 958.42, 958.51, 958.52, and
958.60 of the order provide authority for
assessment, mandatory inspection, and
establishment of grade, size, quality,
maturity, and pack regulations
applicable to the handling of onions.
Section 958.53 of the order provides
authority for the issuance of special
regulations, or the modification,
suspension, or termination of
requirements in effect pursuant to
§§ 958.42, 958.52, 958.60, or any
combination thereof, in order to
facilitate the handling of onions for
certain specified purposes.
Section 958.328 establishes minimum
requirements for onions handled subject
to the order. Currently, no person shall
handle any lot of onions unless such
onions are inspected, are at least
‘‘moderately cured’’, and meet the
grade, size, maturity, and pack
requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), and
(c). Paragraph (e) delineates specific
types of special purpose shipments that
are exempt from the requirements of the
order. Paragraph (f) outlines the
safeguards for such special purpose
shipments.
The Committee recommended the
proposed revision to the handling
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
35998
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
regulations to respond to the industry’s
desire to have greater flexibility in
identifying and pursuing unique
marketing opportunities for onions that
do not conform to the requirements of
the order. The concern from the onion
industry is that onion producers and
handlers within the order’s production
area are at a competitive disadvantage,
relative to other onion producing
regions, with respect to their ability to
identify and develop new markets for
non-standard onions. Adding authority
to allow experimental onion shipments
under the order would give handlers
access to markets not currently available
to them.
An example of a scenario that would
demonstrate the benefits of such a
provision to the industry would be a
handler’s desire to produce and ship a
unique, irregularly shaped small onion
(i.e., a heart or a square shape) targeted
for a newly developed niche market.
Since irregular shape is a physical
characteristic that does not conform to
the order’s grade requirements, such
onions would ordinarily not be allowed
to be handled under the marketing
order. With an exemption for
experimentation, however, the
Committee could allow the shipment of
those specific type onions while still
maintaining the integrity of the order.
Should the market for such onions grow
to a significant size, the Committee
could then incorporate changes into the
handling regulations to accommodate
their handling without the continued
need for an exemption.
The potential for marketing
opportunities like the one described
above motivated the Committee to
recommend modifying the handling
regulation to add ‘‘experimentation’’ to
the already established list of special
purpose shipments allowed under the
order. Shipments for experimental
purposes would be exempt from the
grade, size, maturity, pack, and
inspection requirements of the handling
regulation. Shipments made under the
experimental exemption would
continue to be subject to the assessment
requirement of the order. With a special
purpose shipment provision for
experimentation, handlers would have
greater flexibility in pursuing various
types of unique marketing opportunities
that are currently not available under
the handling regulation.
The Committee would require
handlers to request pre-approval for
such experimental exemptions. Through
the approval process, the Committee
would be able to regulate the quantity
and timing of such shipments. It is the
goal of the Committee that any
experimental shipments of onions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jun 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
would be temporary in nature. At the
point that the emerging experimental
market were to reach a sufficient
volume or continue for such a length of
time as to be deemed sustainable by the
Committee, the Committee could then
recommend changes to the handling
regulation requirements to
accommodate the marketing of such
onions on a permanent basis.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 35 handlers
of Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions who are
subject to regulation under the order
and about 250 onion producers in the
regulated area. Small agricultural
service firms, which include onion
handlers and receivers, are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $7,000,000, and
small agricultural producers are defined
as those whose annual receipts are less
than $750,000.
The National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) reported in the
‘‘Vegetables 2010 Summary,’’ published
in January 2011, that the total F.O.B.
value of onions in the regulated
production area for 2010 was
$133,041,000. Based on an industry
estimate of 35 handlers, the average
value of onions handled per handler is
$3,801,000, well below the SBA
threshold for defining small agricultural
service firms. In addition, based on an
industry estimate of 250 producers, the
average F.O.B. value of onions produced
in the industry is $532,164 per
producer. Since the F.O.B. value is
usually significantly higher than the
farm gate value that the producers
actually receive, most onion producers
within the order’s production area
would be considered small agricultural
producers under the SBA definition.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the
majority of handlers and producers of
Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions may be
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
classified as small entities as defined by
the SBA.
This rule would revise § 958.328(e) of
the order’s handling regulation to allow
special purpose shipments of onions for
the purpose of experimentation without
regard to the minimum grade, size,
maturity, pack, and inspection
requirements currently prescribed under
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of § 958.328.
The recommended revision would allow
the Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion
industry to identify and develop new
markets for non-standard onions that are
currently not open to them. The changes
are expected to benefit producers,
handlers, and consumers of onions.
At the January 20, 2011 meeting, the
Committee discussed the impact of the
recommended changes on handlers and
producers in terms of increased costs.
The Committee believes that, since this
proposed change exempts certain
shipments of onions from regulation,
this action would not add any
additional requirements or costs relative
to the existing regulation. Since the
utilization of the special purpose
shipment provision is voluntary in
nature, any additional regulatory burden
placed on a handler as a result of this
proposed rule would be by their choice.
The proposed changes may, however,
create opportunities for producers and
handlers to develop new markets and to
enhance revenues. The Committee
believes that the potential benefit
associated with this proposed action
outweighs any potential increase in
administrative cost or regulatory burden
incurred by the handler.
The Committee discussed various
alternatives to adding experimental
shipments to the list of special purpose
shipment exemptions contained in the
order’s handling regulation. Some
members suggested that the provision
was too broad in scope and needed
greater restrictions. After deliberation,
the Committee concluded that it would
be impossible to anticipate what might
be ‘‘experimental’’ in the future and that
affording the greatest latitude to the
provision, while maintaining strict
Committee oversight, was in the best
interest of the industry. The Committee
also considered taking no action with
regard to adding an experimental
shipment provision, citing the potential
for abuse. After deliberation, the
Committee agreed that the experimental
shipment provision is needed to
respond to changes in the industry and
that there would be sufficient safeguards
to protect the integrity of the order.
This proposed rule would impose
additional reporting burdens on
handlers who make special purpose
shipments of experimental onions. This
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
action would require the modification of
two existing Committee forms and an
increase in burden hours for three
existing forms. The information
collection requirements are discussed
later in this document. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies. In
addition, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
onion industry, and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the January 20, 2011 meeting
was a public meeting and all entities,
both large and small, were able to
express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), this notice announces that
AMS is requesting the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
approval for a revision to currently
approved forms used to collect
information under this marketing order.
Once the modified forms are approved,
they will be merged with the forms
contained in OMB No. 0581–0178
‘‘Generic OMB Vegetable Crops.’’
Title: Onions Grown in Certain
Designated Counties in Idaho, and
Malheur County, Oregon; Marketing
Order No. 958.
OMB Number: 0581–0178.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved information
collection.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jun 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Abstract: The information collection
requirements in this request are
essential to carry out the intent of the
Act, to provide the respondents the type
of service they request, and to
administer the Idaho-Eastern Oregon
onion marketing order.
On January 20, 2011, the Committee
unanimously recommended revising the
handling regulation to allow special
purpose shipments of onions for
experimentation. To maintain the
handling regulation safeguards, the
proposed action would require minor
revisions to three previously approved
Committee forms: FV–34, FV–35, and
FV–36.
Safeguard requirements in the order’s
handling regulation require each
handler making special purpose
shipments outside the production area
to furnish an Application to Make
Special Purpose Shipments—Certificate
of Privilege, Form FV–34 to the
Committee. The FV–34 form would be
modified as a result of this proposed
action by adding ‘‘Experimentation’’ to
the list of approved purposes for special
purpose onion shipments. In addition,
the words ‘‘except as expressly
authorized by the Committee’’ would be
added to the end of the first sentence of
the form’s certification statement. The
proposed modifications to the form are
not expected to increase the time it
takes each handler to complete the form.
The FV–34 form has already been
approved for 10 burden hours by OMB.
However, the estimated number of
respondents is expected to increase as a
result of this proposed action. As such,
the total burden hours would need to be
increased to account for that change.
Also, after an approved handler has
shipped and billed or consigned a
special purpose onion shipment or
shipments, the handler shall furnish to
the Committee an Onion Diversion
Report, Form FV–35 to report the
number of shipments and the quantity
of onions shipped under the Certificate
of Privilege. No modification to this
form would be required as a result of the
proposed action. This form has already
been approved for 266 burden hours by
OMB. As a result of this proposed
action, however, the estimated number
of respondents is expected to increase.
Accordingly, the total burden hours
would need to be increased to account
for that change.
In addition, as authorized in the
order’s handling regulation safeguards,
the Committee may contact the receiver
or receiver’s agent of special purpose
onion shipments for verification and
request that such receiver or receiver’s
agent complete a Special Purpose
Shipment Receiver Certification, Form
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35999
FV–36. The FV–36 form would be
modified as a result of this proposed
action by adding ‘‘Experimentation’’ to
the list of approved outlets for special
purpose onion shipments. In addition,
the words ‘‘except as expressly
authorized by the Committee’’ would be
added to the end of the first sentence of
the form’s certification statement. The
proposed modifications to the form are
not expected to increase the time it
takes each handler to complete the form.
This form has already been approved for
1.67 burden hours by OMB. However,
the estimated number of respondents is
expected to increase as a result of this
proposed action. Consequently, the total
burden hours would need to be
increased to account for that change.
The information collected will be
used only by authorized representatives
of the USDA, including AMS, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs’ regional and
headquarters’ staff, and authorized
Committee employees. Authorized
Committee employees are the primary
users of the information and AMS is the
secondary user.
The request for approval of the
modification of information collection
under the order is as follows:
Application to Make Special Purpose
Shipments—Certificate of Privilege.
As discussed previously, Form FV–34,
Application to Make Special Purpose
Shipments—Certificate of Privilege, is
already approved under OMB No. 0581–
0178, for 10 hours (25 respondents × 3
responses per respondent × .133 hours
per response, for a total of 10 burden
hours). Because the number of
respondents is expected to increase
from 25 to 30, the estimated total
burden is now 12 hours (30 respondents
× 3 responses × .133 hours). As a result
of this proposed action, the burden is
being increased by 2 hours.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 8 minutes. There
is no change from the previous estimate.
Respondents: Idaho-Eastern Oregon
onion handlers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
30.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 3.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 12 hours.
Onion Diversion Report
Also as mentioned previously, Form
FV–35, Onion Diversion Report, is
already approved under OMB No. 0581–
0178, for 266 hours (20 respondents ×
100 responses per respondent × .133
hours per response, for a total of 266
burden hours). Because the number of
respondents is expected to increase
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
36000
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
from 20 to 25, the estimated total
burden is now 333 hours (25
respondents × 100 responses × .133
hours). As a result of this action, the
burden is being increased by 67 hours.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 8 minutes. There
is no change from the previous estimate.
Respondents: Idaho-Eastern Oregon
onion handlers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
25.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 100.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 333 hours.
Special Purpose Shipment Receiver
Certification
Additionally, as previously
mentioned, Form FV–36, Special
Purpose Shipment Receiver
Certification, is already approved under
OMB No. 0581–0178, for 1.67 hours (50
respondents × 1 responses per
respondent × .033 hours per response,
for a total of 1.67 burden hours).
Because the number of respondents is
expected to increase from 50 to 60, the
estimated total burden is now 2 hours
(60 respondents × 1 responses × .033
hours). As a result of this action, the
burden is being increased by .33 hours.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 2 minutes. There
is no change from the previous estimate.
Respondents: Receivers of special
purpose shipments of Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
60.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No.
0581–0178 and the Marketing Order for
Onions Grown in Certain Counties of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jun 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon,
and be sent to the USDA in care of the
Docket Clerk at the previously
mentioned address. All comments
timely received will be available for
public inspection during regular
business hours at the same address.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record. Upon
OMB approval, this collection will be
merged with the forms currently
approved for use under OMB No. 0581–
0241 ‘‘Generic OMB Vegetable Crops.’’
As mentioned previously, all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 958
Marketing agreements, Onions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR
part 958 is proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 958—ONIONS GROWN IN
CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY,
OREGON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 958 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 958.328, revise paragraph (e)
and paragraph (f) introductory text to
read as follows:
§ 958.328
Handling regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Special purpose shipments. (1)
The minimum grade, size, maturity,
pack, assessment, and inspection
requirements of this section shall not be
applicable to shipments of onions for
any of the following purposes:
(i) Planting,
(ii) Livestock feed,
(iii) Charity,
(iv) Dehydration,
(v) Canning,
(vi) Freezing,
(vii) Extraction,
(viii) Pickling, and
(ix) Disposal.
(2) Shipments of onions for the
purpose of experimentation, as
approved by the Committee, may be
made without regard to the minimum
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
grade, size, maturity, pack, and
inspection requirements of this section.
Assessment requirements shall be
applicable to such shipments.
(3) The minimum grade, size, and
maturity requirements set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section shall not be
applicable to shipments of pearl onions,
but the maximum size requirement in
paragraph (h) of this section and the
assessment and inspection requirements
shall be applicable to shipments of
pearls onions.
(f) Safeguards. Each handler making
shipments of onions outside the
production area for dehydration,
canning, freezing, extraction, pickling,
or experimentation pursuant to
paragraph (e) of this section shall:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 15, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–15445 Filed 6–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
11 CFR Part 109
[Notice 2011–09]
Rulemaking Petition: Independent
Expenditure Reporting
Federal Election Commission.
Rulemaking petition: Notice of
availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On April 21, 2011, the
Commission received a Petition for
Rulemaking from Representative Chris
Van Hollen. The Petition urges the
Commission to revise and amend the
regulations at 11 CFR 109.10(e)(1)(vi)
regarding the reporting of independent
expenditures by persons other than
political committees. The Petition is
available for inspection in the
Commission’s Public Records Office, on
its website, https://www.fec.gov/fosers/,
and through its Faxline service.
DATES: Statements in support of or in
opposition to the Petition must be
submitted on or before August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: All comments must be in
writing. Comments may be submitted
electronically via the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.fec.gov/fosers/.
Commenters are encouraged to submit
comments electronically to ensure
timely receipt and consideration.
Alternatively, comments may be
submitted in paper form. Paper
comments must be sent to the Federal
Election Commission, Attn.: Robert M.
Knop, Assistant General Counsel, 999 E
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35997-36000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15445]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 35997]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 958
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0025; FV11-958-1 PR]
Onions Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur
County, OR; Modification of Handling Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments on revisions to the handling
regulation for onions handled under the Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion
marketing order. The marketing order regulates the handling of onions
grown in designated counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon, and
is administered locally by the Idaho-Eastern Oregon Onion Committee
(Committee). This rule would revise the marketing order's handling
regulation to allow special purpose shipments of onions for
experimentation. The revision would allow the Idaho-Eastern Oregon
onion industry to identify and develop new market niches and is
expected to benefit producers, handlers, and consumers of onions. This
proposal also announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS)
intent to request a revision of the currently approved information
collection requirements under the order.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Broadbent or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 805 SW., Broadway,
Suite 930, Portland, OR 97205; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503)
326-7440, or E-mail: Barry.Broadbent@usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 130 and Marketing Order No. 958, both as amended (7 CFR
part 958), regulating the handling of onions grown in certain
designated counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under Sec. 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule invites comments on revisions to the handling
regulation for onions handled under the order. Specifically, this rule
would revise the handling regulation to allow special purpose shipments
of onions for the purpose of experimentation without regard to the
minimum grade, size, maturity, pack, and inspection requirements of the
order. The revision would give the Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion industry
the opportunity to identify and develop new markets. The changes are
expected to benefit producers, handlers, and consumers of onions. This
rule was unanimously recommended by the Committee at its January 20,
2011, meeting.
Sections 958.42, 958.51, 958.52, and 958.60 of the order provide
authority for assessment, mandatory inspection, and establishment of
grade, size, quality, maturity, and pack regulations applicable to the
handling of onions. Section 958.53 of the order provides authority for
the issuance of special regulations, or the modification, suspension,
or termination of requirements in effect pursuant to Sec. Sec. 958.42,
958.52, 958.60, or any combination thereof, in order to facilitate the
handling of onions for certain specified purposes.
Section 958.328 establishes minimum requirements for onions handled
subject to the order. Currently, no person shall handle any lot of
onions unless such onions are inspected, are at least ``moderately
cured'', and meet the grade, size, maturity, and pack requirements of
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c). Paragraph (e) delineates specific types
of special purpose shipments that are exempt from the requirements of
the order. Paragraph (f) outlines the safeguards for such special
purpose shipments.
The Committee recommended the proposed revision to the handling
[[Page 35998]]
regulations to respond to the industry's desire to have greater
flexibility in identifying and pursuing unique marketing opportunities
for onions that do not conform to the requirements of the order. The
concern from the onion industry is that onion producers and handlers
within the order's production area are at a competitive disadvantage,
relative to other onion producing regions, with respect to their
ability to identify and develop new markets for non-standard onions.
Adding authority to allow experimental onion shipments under the order
would give handlers access to markets not currently available to them.
An example of a scenario that would demonstrate the benefits of
such a provision to the industry would be a handler's desire to produce
and ship a unique, irregularly shaped small onion (i.e., a heart or a
square shape) targeted for a newly developed niche market. Since
irregular shape is a physical characteristic that does not conform to
the order's grade requirements, such onions would ordinarily not be
allowed to be handled under the marketing order. With an exemption for
experimentation, however, the Committee could allow the shipment of
those specific type onions while still maintaining the integrity of the
order. Should the market for such onions grow to a significant size,
the Committee could then incorporate changes into the handling
regulations to accommodate their handling without the continued need
for an exemption.
The potential for marketing opportunities like the one described
above motivated the Committee to recommend modifying the handling
regulation to add ``experimentation'' to the already established list
of special purpose shipments allowed under the order. Shipments for
experimental purposes would be exempt from the grade, size, maturity,
pack, and inspection requirements of the handling regulation. Shipments
made under the experimental exemption would continue to be subject to
the assessment requirement of the order. With a special purpose
shipment provision for experimentation, handlers would have greater
flexibility in pursuing various types of unique marketing opportunities
that are currently not available under the handling regulation.
The Committee would require handlers to request pre-approval for
such experimental exemptions. Through the approval process, the
Committee would be able to regulate the quantity and timing of such
shipments. It is the goal of the Committee that any experimental
shipments of onions would be temporary in nature. At the point that the
emerging experimental market were to reach a sufficient volume or
continue for such a length of time as to be deemed sustainable by the
Committee, the Committee could then recommend changes to the handling
regulation requirements to accommodate the marketing of such onions on
a permanent basis.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 35 handlers of Idaho-Eastern Oregon onions
who are subject to regulation under the order and about 250 onion
producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms,
which include onion handlers and receivers, are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are
defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $750,000.
The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported in the
``Vegetables 2010 Summary,'' published in January 2011, that the total
F.O.B. value of onions in the regulated production area for 2010 was
$133,041,000. Based on an industry estimate of 35 handlers, the average
value of onions handled per handler is $3,801,000, well below the SBA
threshold for defining small agricultural service firms. In addition,
based on an industry estimate of 250 producers, the average F.O.B.
value of onions produced in the industry is $532,164 per producer.
Since the F.O.B. value is usually significantly higher than the farm
gate value that the producers actually receive, most onion producers
within the order's production area would be considered small
agricultural producers under the SBA definition. Therefore, it can be
concluded that the majority of handlers and producers of Idaho-Eastern
Oregon onions may be classified as small entities as defined by the
SBA.
This rule would revise Sec. 958.328(e) of the order's handling
regulation to allow special purpose shipments of onions for the purpose
of experimentation without regard to the minimum grade, size, maturity,
pack, and inspection requirements currently prescribed under paragraphs
(a), (b), and (c) of Sec. 958.328. The recommended revision would
allow the Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion industry to identify and develop
new markets for non-standard onions that are currently not open to
them. The changes are expected to benefit producers, handlers, and
consumers of onions.
At the January 20, 2011 meeting, the Committee discussed the impact
of the recommended changes on handlers and producers in terms of
increased costs. The Committee believes that, since this proposed
change exempts certain shipments of onions from regulation, this action
would not add any additional requirements or costs relative to the
existing regulation. Since the utilization of the special purpose
shipment provision is voluntary in nature, any additional regulatory
burden placed on a handler as a result of this proposed rule would be
by their choice. The proposed changes may, however, create
opportunities for producers and handlers to develop new markets and to
enhance revenues. The Committee believes that the potential benefit
associated with this proposed action outweighs any potential increase
in administrative cost or regulatory burden incurred by the handler.
The Committee discussed various alternatives to adding experimental
shipments to the list of special purpose shipment exemptions contained
in the order's handling regulation. Some members suggested that the
provision was too broad in scope and needed greater restrictions. After
deliberation, the Committee concluded that it would be impossible to
anticipate what might be ``experimental'' in the future and that
affording the greatest latitude to the provision, while maintaining
strict Committee oversight, was in the best interest of the industry.
The Committee also considered taking no action with regard to adding an
experimental shipment provision, citing the potential for abuse. After
deliberation, the Committee agreed that the experimental shipment
provision is needed to respond to changes in the industry and that
there would be sufficient safeguards to protect the integrity of the
order.
This proposed rule would impose additional reporting burdens on
handlers who make special purpose shipments of experimental onions.
This
[[Page 35999]]
action would require the modification of two existing Committee forms
and an increase in burden hours for three existing forms. The
information collection requirements are discussed later in this
document. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the onion industry, and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like
all Committee meetings, the January 20, 2011 meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express
their views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), this notice announces that AMS is requesting the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) approval for a revision to currently
approved forms used to collect information under this marketing order.
Once the modified forms are approved, they will be merged with the
forms contained in OMB No. 0581-0178 ``Generic OMB Vegetable Crops.''
Title: Onions Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and
Malheur County, Oregon; Marketing Order No. 958.
OMB Number: 0581-0178.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: The information collection requirements in this request
are essential to carry out the intent of the Act, to provide the
respondents the type of service they request, and to administer the
Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion marketing order.
On January 20, 2011, the Committee unanimously recommended revising
the handling regulation to allow special purpose shipments of onions
for experimentation. To maintain the handling regulation safeguards,
the proposed action would require minor revisions to three previously
approved Committee forms: FV-34, FV-35, and FV-36.
Safeguard requirements in the order's handling regulation require
each handler making special purpose shipments outside the production
area to furnish an Application to Make Special Purpose Shipments--
Certificate of Privilege, Form FV-34 to the Committee. The FV-34 form
would be modified as a result of this proposed action by adding
``Experimentation'' to the list of approved purposes for special
purpose onion shipments. In addition, the words ``except as expressly
authorized by the Committee'' would be added to the end of the first
sentence of the form's certification statement. The proposed
modifications to the form are not expected to increase the time it
takes each handler to complete the form. The FV-34 form has already
been approved for 10 burden hours by OMB. However, the estimated number
of respondents is expected to increase as a result of this proposed
action. As such, the total burden hours would need to be increased to
account for that change.
Also, after an approved handler has shipped and billed or consigned
a special purpose onion shipment or shipments, the handler shall
furnish to the Committee an Onion Diversion Report, Form FV-35 to
report the number of shipments and the quantity of onions shipped under
the Certificate of Privilege. No modification to this form would be
required as a result of the proposed action. This form has already been
approved for 266 burden hours by OMB. As a result of this proposed
action, however, the estimated number of respondents is expected to
increase. Accordingly, the total burden hours would need to be
increased to account for that change.
In addition, as authorized in the order's handling regulation
safeguards, the Committee may contact the receiver or receiver's agent
of special purpose onion shipments for verification and request that
such receiver or receiver's agent complete a Special Purpose Shipment
Receiver Certification, Form FV-36. The FV-36 form would be modified as
a result of this proposed action by adding ``Experimentation'' to the
list of approved outlets for special purpose onion shipments. In
addition, the words ``except as expressly authorized by the Committee''
would be added to the end of the first sentence of the form's
certification statement. The proposed modifications to the form are not
expected to increase the time it takes each handler to complete the
form. This form has already been approved for 1.67 burden hours by OMB.
However, the estimated number of respondents is expected to increase as
a result of this proposed action. Consequently, the total burden hours
would need to be increased to account for that change.
The information collected will be used only by authorized
representatives of the USDA, including AMS, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs' regional and headquarters' staff, and authorized Committee
employees. Authorized Committee employees are the primary users of the
information and AMS is the secondary user.
The request for approval of the modification of information
collection under the order is as follows:
Application to Make Special Purpose Shipments--Certificate of
Privilege.
As discussed previously, Form FV-34, Application to Make Special
Purpose Shipments--Certificate of Privilege, is already approved under
OMB No. 0581-0178, for 10 hours (25 respondents x 3 responses per
respondent x .133 hours per response, for a total of 10 burden hours).
Because the number of respondents is expected to increase from 25 to
30, the estimated total burden is now 12 hours (30 respondents x 3
responses x .133 hours). As a result of this proposed action, the
burden is being increased by 2 hours.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 8 minutes. There is no change from
the previous estimate.
Respondents: Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion handlers.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 30.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 3.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 12 hours.
Onion Diversion Report
Also as mentioned previously, Form FV-35, Onion Diversion Report,
is already approved under OMB No. 0581-0178, for 266 hours (20
respondents x 100 responses per respondent x .133 hours per response,
for a total of 266 burden hours). Because the number of respondents is
expected to increase
[[Page 36000]]
from 20 to 25, the estimated total burden is now 333 hours (25
respondents x 100 responses x .133 hours). As a result of this action,
the burden is being increased by 67 hours.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 8 minutes. There is no change from
the previous estimate.
Respondents: Idaho-Eastern Oregon onion handlers.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 25.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 100.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 333 hours.
Special Purpose Shipment Receiver Certification
Additionally, as previously mentioned, Form FV-36, Special Purpose
Shipment Receiver Certification, is already approved under OMB No.
0581-0178, for 1.67 hours (50 respondents x 1 responses per respondent
x .033 hours per response, for a total of 1.67 burden hours). Because
the number of respondents is expected to increase from 50 to 60, the
estimated total burden is now 2 hours (60 respondents x 1 responses x
.033 hours). As a result of this action, the burden is being increased
by .33 hours.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 2 minutes. There is no change from
the previous estimate.
Respondents: Receivers of special purpose shipments of Idaho-
Eastern Oregon onions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 60.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No. 0581-0178 and the Marketing Order
for Onions Grown in Certain Counties of Idaho, and Malheur County,
Oregon, and be sent to the USDA in care of the Docket Clerk at the
previously mentioned address. All comments timely received will be
available for public inspection during regular business hours at the
same address.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public
record. Upon OMB approval, this collection will be merged with the
forms currently approved for use under OMB No. 0581-0241 ``Generic OMB
Vegetable Crops.'' As mentioned previously, all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector
agencies.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 958
Marketing agreements, Onions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR part 958 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 958--ONIONS GROWN IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN IDAHO, AND
MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 958 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. In Sec. 958.328, revise paragraph (e) and paragraph (f)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 958.328 Handling regulation.
* * * * *
(e) Special purpose shipments. (1) The minimum grade, size,
maturity, pack, assessment, and inspection requirements of this section
shall not be applicable to shipments of onions for any of the following
purposes:
(i) Planting,
(ii) Livestock feed,
(iii) Charity,
(iv) Dehydration,
(v) Canning,
(vi) Freezing,
(vii) Extraction,
(viii) Pickling, and
(ix) Disposal.
(2) Shipments of onions for the purpose of experimentation, as
approved by the Committee, may be made without regard to the minimum
grade, size, maturity, pack, and inspection requirements of this
section. Assessment requirements shall be applicable to such shipments.
(3) The minimum grade, size, and maturity requirements set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section shall not be applicable to shipments of
pearl onions, but the maximum size requirement in paragraph (h) of this
section and the assessment and inspection requirements shall be
applicable to shipments of pearls onions.
(f) Safeguards. Each handler making shipments of onions outside the
production area for dehydration, canning, freezing, extraction,
pickling, or experimentation pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section
shall:
* * * * *
Dated: June 15, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-15445 Filed 6-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P