Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of 12 Species in the Mountain-Prairie Region, 35906-35908 [2011-15183]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
35906
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2011 / Notices
Screen
outs
ALL MODES
Total Number Responses .....................................................................................................
Total Burden Hours ..............................................................................................................
Status of the proposed information
collection: Continuing under current
authorization.
Authority: Section 8(C)(1) of the United
States Housing Act of 1937.
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Raphael W. Bostic,
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development
& Research.
[FR Doc. 2011–15275 Filed 6–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R6–ES–2011–N101; 60120–1113–
0000; C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of
12 Species in the Mountain-Prairie
Region
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews;
request for information.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year
status reviews under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
of 2 animal and 10 plant species. We are
requesting any information that has
become available since our original
listing of each of these species. Based on
review results, we will determine
whether we should change the listing
status of any of these species.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written information by
August 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: For how and where to send
comments or information, see ‘‘VIII.
Contacts.’’
SUMMARY:
To
request information, see ‘‘VIII.
Contacts.’’ Individuals who are hearing
impaired or speech impaired may call
the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8337 for TTY (telephone typewriter or
teletypewriter) assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
initiating 5-year status reviews under
the Act of 2 animal and 10 plant
species: Autumn buttercup (Ranunculus
acriformis var. aestivalis), clay phacelia
(Phacelia argillacea), Colorado butterfly
plant (Gaura neomexicana ssp.
coloradensis), desert yellowhead
(Yermo xanthocephalus), dwarf bearpoppy (Arctomecon humilis), Last
Chance townsendia (Townsendia
aprica), Neosho madtom (Noturus
placidus), Penland alpine fen mustard
(Eutrema penlandii), Salt Creek tiger
beetle (Cicindela nevadica lincolniana),
San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus
despainii), Welsh’s milkweed (Asclepias
welshii), and Winkler cactus
(Pediocactus winkleri) species.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Why do we conduct 5-year reviews?
We conduct 5-year status reviews to
ensure that our classification of each
species on the Lists of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants as
threatened or endangered is accurate. A
5-year review assesses the best scientific
and commercial data available at the
time of the review. We are requesting
any information that has become
available since our original listing of the
species under review. Based on review
results, we will determine whether we
should change the listing status of any
of these species.
Under the Act, we maintain Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants (which we collectively refer
to as the List) in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for
animals) and 17.12 (for plants). Section
8572
602
Stayers
Movers
........................
........................
........................
........................
4(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires us to
review each listed species’ status at least
once every 5 years. Then, under section
4(c)(2)(B), we determine whether to
remove any species from the List
(delist), to reclassify it from endangered
to threatened, or to reclassify it from
threatened to endangered. Any change
in Federal classification requires a
separate rulemaking process.
In classifying, we use the following
definitions, from 50 CFR 424.02:
A. Species includes any species or
subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
and any distinct population segment of
any species of vertebrate, that
interbreeds when mature;
B. Endangered species means any
species that is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range; and
C. Threatened species means any
species that is likely to become an
endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
We must support delisting by the best
scientific and commercial data
available, and only consider delisting if
data substantiate that the species is
neither endangered nor threatened for
one or more of the following reasons (50
CFR 424.11(d)):
A. The species is considered extinct;
B. The species is considered to be
recovered; or
C. The original data available when
the species was listed, or the
interpretation of data, were in error.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing the species
we are reviewing.
II. What species are under review?
This notice announces our active 5year status reviews of the species in
Table 1.
TABLE 1—CURRENT LISTING STATUS OF SPECIES UNDER 5-YEAR STATUS REVIEW
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Common name
Scientific name
Status
Where listed
Final listing rule publication
date & citation
ANIMALS
Beetle, Salt Creek Tiger ....
Madtom, Neosho ...............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Cicindela nevadica
lincolniana.
Noturus placidus ...............
16:50 Jun 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Endangered .......................
U.S.A. (NE) .......................
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (KS, MO, OK) ........
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
October 6, 2005 (70 FR
58335).
May 22, 1990 (55 FR
21148).
35907
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 1—CURRENT LISTING STATUS OF SPECIES UNDER 5-YEAR STATUS REVIEW—Continued
Common name
Where listed
Final listing rule publication
date & citation
Endangered .......................
U.S.A. (UT) .......................
Endangered .......................
U.S.A. (UT) .......................
July 21, 1989 (54 FR
30550).
September 28, 1978 (43
FR 44810).
October 18, 2000 (65 FR
62302).
March 14, 2002 (67 FR
11442).
November 6, 1979 (44 FR
64250).
August 21, 1985 (50 FR
33734).
July 28, 1993 (58 FR
40539).
September 16, 1987 (52
FR 34914).
October 28, 1987 (52 FR
41435).
August 20, 1998 (63 FR
44587).
Scientific name
Status
PLANTS
Autumn buttercup ..............
Clay phacelia .....................
Colorado butterfly plant .....
Ranunculus acriformis var.
aestivalis.
Phacelia argillacea ............
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (WY, NE, CO) ........
Desert yellowhead .............
Gaura Neomexicana ssp.
coloradensis.
Yermo xanthocephalus .....
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (WY) ......................
Dwarf bear-poppy ..............
Arctomecon humilis ...........
Endangered .......................
U.S.A. (UT) .......................
Last Chance townsendia ...
Townsendia aprica ............
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (UT) .......................
Penland alpine fen mustard.
San Rafael cactus .............
Eutrema penlandii .............
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (CO) .......................
Pediocactus despainii .......
Endangered .......................
U.S.A. (UT) .......................
Welsh’s milkweed ..............
Asclepias welshii ...............
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (AZ, UT) .................
Winkler cactus ...................
Pediocactus winkleri .........
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (UT) .......................
III. What do we consider in our review?
We consider all new information
available at the time we conduct a 5year status review. We consider the best
scientific and commercial data that has
become available since our current
listing determination or most recent
status review, such as:
A. Species biology, including but not
limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics;
B. Habitat conditions, including but
not limited to amount, distribution, and
suitability;
C. Conservation measures that have
been implemented that benefit the
species;
D. Threat status and trends (see five
factors under heading ‘‘IV. How do we
determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened?’’); and
E. Other new information, data, or
corrections, including but not limited to
taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,
identification of erroneous information
contained in the List, and improved
analytical methods.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. How do we determine whether a
species is endangered or threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that
we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors:
A. The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Jun 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
B. Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
C. Disease or predation;
D. The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
E. Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we
must base our assessment of these
factors solely on the best scientific and
commercial data available.
V. What could happen as a result of our
review?
For each species under review, if we
find new information that indicates a
change in classification may be
warranted, we may propose a new rule
that could do one of the following:
A. Reclassify the species from
threatened to endangered (uplist);
B. Reclassify the species from
endangered to threatened (downlist); or
C. Remove the species from the List
(delist).
If we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then the
species remains on the List under its
current status.
VI. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is
complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we request new
information from all sources. See ‘‘III.
What do we consider in our review?’’
for specific criteria. If you submit
information, support it with
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
documentation such as maps,
bibliographic references, methods used
to gather and analyze the data, and/or
copies of any pertinent publications,
reports, or letters by knowledgeable
sources.
Submit your comments and materials
to the appropriate Fish and Wildlife
Office listed under ‘‘VIII. Contacts.’’
VII. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the offices where the comments
are submitted.
VIII. Contacts
Send your comments and information
on the following species, as well as
requests for information, to the
corresponding contacts/addresses
included in Table 2. You may view
information we receive in response to
this notice, as well as other
documentation in our files, at the
following locations by appointment,
during normal business hours.
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
35908
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 2—CONTACT INFORMATION FOR SPECIES UNDER 5-YEAR STATUS REVIEW
Species
Contact person, phone, e-mail
Contact address
Neosho Madtom ................................................
Mike LeValley, Kansas Field Supervisor; (785)
539–3474; e-mail Mike_LeValley@fws.gov.
Salt Creek Tiger Beetle .....................................
Michael George, Nebraska Field Supervisor;
(308)
382–6468;
e-mail
Mike_George@fws.gov.
Autumn buttercup, Clay phacelia, Dwarf bearpoppy, Last Chance townsendia, San Rafael
cactus, Winkler cactus, Welsh’s milkweed.
Larry Crist, Utah Field Supervisor; (801) 975–
3330; e-mail Larry_Crist@fws.gov.
Colorado butterfly plant, Desert yellowhead .....
Mark Sattelberg, Wyoming Field Supervisor;
(307)
772–2374;
e-mail
Mark_Sattelberg@fws.gov.
Penland alpine fen mustard ...............................
Al Pfister, Western Colorado Supervisor; (970)
243–2778; e-mail Al_Pfister@fws.gov.
Kansas Field Office, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Attention: Neosho Madtom 5-Year Review, 2609 Anderson Avenue, Manhattan,
KS 66502.
Nebraska Field Office, U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service, Attention: Salt Creek Tiger Beetle
5-Year Review, 203 West Second, 2nd
Floor, Federal Building, Grand Island, NE
68801.
Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service,
Attention: 5-Year Review, 2369 West Orton
Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, UT
84119.
Wyoming Field Office, U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service, Attention: 5-Year Review, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Suite 308A, Cheyenne,
WY 82009.
Western Colorado Field Office, U.S. Fish &
Wildlife Service, Attention: 5-Year Review,
764 Horizon Drive, Building B, Grand Junction, CO 81506–3946.
IX. Authority
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
We publish this notice under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Bureau of Land Management
Dated: May 25, 2011.
Noreen E. Walsh,
Deputy Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
Filing of Plats of Survey; Oregon/
Washington
[LLOR957000–L631000000–HD000; HAG11–
0249]
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
Notice.
[FR Doc. 2011–15183 Filed 6–17–11; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
The plats of survey of the
following described lands are scheduled
to be officially filed in the Bureau of
Land Management Oregon/Washington
State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days
from the date of this publication.
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVS00560.L58530000.FR0000.241A; N–
57230; 11–08807; MO#450020986;
TAS:14X5232]
Notice of Correction for Conveyance of
Public Lands for Airport Purposes in
Clark County, Nevada
In notice document 2011–12626
appearing on page 29784 in the issue of
Monday, May 23, 2011 make the
following correction:
In the second column, under the
heading ‘‘Mount Diablo Meridian’’ in
the fifth line ‘‘NW14NE14SE1⁄4’’ should
read ‘‘NW1⁄4NE1⁄4SE1⁄4’’.
Willamette Meridian
Oregon
T. 30 S., R. 3 W., accepted May 2, 2011.
T. 23 S., R. 3 W., accepted May 2, 2011.
T. 7 S., R. 9 W., accepted May 13, 2011.
T. 30 S., R. 8 W., accepted May 13,
2011.
T. 15 S., R. 1 W., accepted May 13,
2011.
T. 27 S., R. 3 W., accepted May 18,
2011.
T. 27 S., R. 4 W. accepted May 18, 2011.
T. 34 S., R. 3 W., accepted May 25,
2011.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. C1–2011–12626 Filed 6–17–11; 8:45 am]
Washington
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
T. 20 N., R. 2 W., accepted May 13,
2011.
A copy of the plats may be
obtained from the Land Office at the
Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/
Washington State Office, 333 SW 1st
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Jun 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
required payment. A person or party
who wishes to protest against a survey
must file a notice that they wish to
protest (at the above address) with the
Oregon/Washington State Director,
Bureau of Land Management, Portland,
Oregon.
Kyle
Hensley, (503) 808–6124, Branch of
Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land
Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue,
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fred O’Ferrall,
Chief, Branch of Land, Mineral, and Energy
Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011–15184 Filed 6–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 118 (Monday, June 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35906-35908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15183]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R6-ES-2011-N101; 60120-1113-0000; C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status
Reviews of 12 Species in the Mountain-Prairie Region
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year
status reviews under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(Act), of 2 animal and 10 plant species. We are requesting any
information that has become available since our original listing of
each of these species. Based on review results, we will determine
whether we should change the listing status of any of these species.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written information by
August 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: For how and where to send comments or information, see
``VIII. Contacts.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request information, see ``VIII.
Contacts.'' Individuals who are hearing impaired or speech impaired may
call the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8337 for TTY (telephone
typewriter or teletypewriter) assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are initiating 5-year status reviews
under the Act of 2 animal and 10 plant species: Autumn buttercup
(Ranunculus acriformis var. aestivalis), clay phacelia (Phacelia
argillacea), Colorado butterfly plant (Gaura neomexicana ssp.
coloradensis), desert yellowhead (Yermo xanthocephalus), dwarf bear-
poppy (Arctomecon humilis), Last Chance townsendia (Townsendia aprica),
Neosho madtom (Noturus placidus), Penland alpine fen mustard (Eutrema
penlandii), Salt Creek tiger beetle (Cicindela nevadica lincolniana),
San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii), Welsh's milkweed (Asclepias
welshii), and Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) species.
I. Why do we conduct 5-year reviews?
We conduct 5-year status reviews to ensure that our classification
of each species on the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants as threatened or endangered is accurate. A 5-year review
assesses the best scientific and commercial data available at the time
of the review. We are requesting any information that has become
available since our original listing of the species under review. Based
on review results, we will determine whether we should change the
listing status of any of these species.
Under the Act, we maintain Lists of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants (which we collectively refer to as the List) in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and
17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires us to review
each listed species' status at least once every 5 years. Then, under
section 4(c)(2)(B), we determine whether to remove any species from the
List (delist), to reclassify it from endangered to threatened, or to
reclassify it from threatened to endangered. Any change in Federal
classification requires a separate rulemaking process.
In classifying, we use the following definitions, from 50 CFR
424.02:
A. Species includes any species or subspecies of fish, wildlife, or
plant, and any distinct population segment of any species of
vertebrate, that interbreeds when mature;
B. Endangered species means any species that is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range; and
C. Threatened species means any species that is likely to become an
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
We must support delisting by the best scientific and commercial
data available, and only consider delisting if data substantiate that
the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more of the
following reasons (50 CFR 424.11(d)):
A. The species is considered extinct;
B. The species is considered to be recovered; or
C. The original data available when the species was listed, or the
interpretation of data, were in error.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing the species we are reviewing.
II. What species are under review?
This notice announces our active 5-year status reviews of the
species in Table 1.
Table 1--Current Listing Status of Species Under 5-Year Status Review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final listing rule
Common name Scientific name Status Where listed publication date &
citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANIMALS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beetle, Salt Creek Tiger........ Cicindela nevadica Endangered........ U.S.A. (NE)....... October 6, 2005
lincolniana. (70 FR 58335).
Madtom, Neosho.................. Noturus placidus.. Threatened........ U.S.A. (KS, MO, May 22, 1990 (55
OK). FR 21148).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 35907]]
PLANTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autumn buttercup................ Ranunculus Endangered........ U.S.A. (UT)....... July 21, 1989 (54
acriformis var. FR 30550).
aestivalis.
Clay phacelia................... Phacelia Endangered........ U.S.A. (UT)....... September 28, 1978
argillacea. (43 FR 44810).
Colorado butterfly plant........ Gaura Neomexicana Threatened........ U.S.A. (WY, NE, October 18, 2000
ssp. coloradensis. CO). (65 FR 62302).
Desert yellowhead............... Yermo Threatened........ U.S.A. (WY)....... March 14, 2002 (67
xanthocephalus. FR 11442).
Dwarf bear-poppy................ Arctomecon humilis Endangered........ U.S.A. (UT)....... November 6, 1979
(44 FR 64250).
Last Chance townsendia.......... Townsendia aprica. Threatened........ U.S.A. (UT)....... August 21, 1985
(50 FR 33734).
Penland alpine fen mustard...... Eutrema penlandii. Threatened........ U.S.A. (CO)....... July 28, 1993 (58
FR 40539).
San Rafael cactus............... Pediocactus Endangered........ U.S.A. (UT)....... September 16, 1987
despainii. (52 FR 34914).
Welsh's milkweed................ Asclepias welshii. Threatened........ U.S.A. (AZ, UT)... October 28, 1987
(52 FR 41435).
Winkler cactus.................. Pediocactus Threatened........ U.S.A. (UT)....... August 20, 1998
winkleri. (63 FR 44587).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. What do we consider in our review?
We consider all new information available at the time we conduct a
5-year status review. We consider the best scientific and commercial
data that has become available since our current listing determination
or most recent status review, such as:
A. Species biology, including but not limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
B. Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount,
distribution, and suitability;
C. Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit
the species;
D. Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ``IV.
How do we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened?'');
and
E. Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not
limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of
erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical
methods.
IV. How do we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that we determine whether a
species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five
following factors:
A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
C. Disease or predation;
D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we must base our assessment of
these factors solely on the best scientific and commercial data
available.
V. What could happen as a result of our review?
For each species under review, if we find new information that
indicates a change in classification may be warranted, we may propose a
new rule that could do one of the following:
A. Reclassify the species from threatened to endangered (uplist);
B. Reclassify the species from endangered to threatened (downlist);
or
C. Remove the species from the List (delist).
If we determine that a change in classification is not warranted,
then the species remains on the List under its current status.
VI. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial information, we request new
information from all sources. See ``III. What do we consider in our
review?'' for specific criteria. If you submit information, support it
with documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods used
to gather and analyze the data, and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources.
Submit your comments and materials to the appropriate Fish and
Wildlife Office listed under ``VIII. Contacts.''
VII. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. Comments and materials received will be available for
public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
offices where the comments are submitted.
VIII. Contacts
Send your comments and information on the following species, as
well as requests for information, to the corresponding contacts/
addresses included in Table 2. You may view information we receive in
response to this notice, as well as other documentation in our files,
at the following locations by appointment, during normal business
hours.
[[Page 35908]]
Table 2--Contact Information for Species Under 5-Year Status Review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact person,
Species phone, e-mail Contact address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neosho Madtom................... Mike LeValley, Kansas Field
Kansas Field Office, U.S. Fish
Supervisor; (785) & Wildlife
539-3474; e-mail Service,
Mike--LeValley@fw Attention: Neosho
s.gov. Madtom 5-Year
Review, 2609
Anderson Avenue,
Manhattan, KS
66502.
Salt Creek Tiger Beetle......... Michael George, Nebraska Field
Nebraska Field Office, U.S. Fish
Supervisor; (308) & Wildlife
382-6468; e-mail Service,
Mike--George@fws. Attention: Salt
gov. Creek Tiger
Beetle 5-Year
Review, 203 West
Second, 2nd
Floor, Federal
Building, Grand
Island, NE 68801.
Autumn buttercup, Clay phacelia, Larry Crist, Utah Utah Field Office,
Dwarf bear-poppy, Last Chance Field Supervisor; U.S. Fish &
townsendia, San Rafael cactus, (801) 975-3330; e- Wildlife Service,
Winkler cactus, Welsh's mail Larry-- Attention: 5-Year
milkweed. Crist@fws.gov. Review, 2369 West
Orton Circle,
Suite 50, West
Valley City, UT
84119.
Colorado butterfly plant, Desert Mark Sattelberg, Wyoming Field
yellowhead. Wyoming Field Office, U.S. Fish
Supervisor; (307) & Wildlife
772-2374; e-mail Service,
Mark--Sattelberg@ Attention: 5-Year
fws.gov. Review, 5353
Yellowstone Road,
Suite 308A,
Cheyenne, WY
82009.
Penland alpine fen mustard...... Al Pfister, Western Colorado
Western Colorado Field Office,
Supervisor; (970) U.S. Fish &
243-2778; e-mail Wildlife Service,
Al--Pfister@fws.g Attention: 5-Year
ov. Review, 764
Horizon Drive,
Building B, Grand
Junction, CO
81506-3946.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IX. Authority
We publish this notice under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: May 25, 2011.
Noreen E. Walsh,
Deputy Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2011-15183 Filed 6-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
