Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices; Classification of the Wireless Air-Conduction Hearing Aid, 34845-34847 [2011-14790]
Download as PDF
34845
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 115
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 874
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0361]
Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat
Devices; Classification of the Wireless
Air-Conduction Hearing Aid
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
wireless air-conduction hearing aid into
class II (special controls). The Agency is
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) in order to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective July 15,
2011. The classification was effective on
March 31, 2011.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vasant Dasika, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 2443, Silver Spring
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5365.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)),
devices that were not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976 (the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976), generally
referred to as postamendments devices,
are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate
device that does not require premarket
approval. The Agency determines
whether new devices are substantially
equivalent to predicate devices by
means of premarket notification
procedures in section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part
807 of the regulations (21 CFR part 807).
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act
provides that any person who submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified may,
within 30 days after receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1), request FDA to
classify the device under the criteria set
forth in section 513(a)(1). FDA will,
within 60 days of receiving this request,
classify the device by written order.
This classification will be the initial
classification of the device. Within 30
days after the issuance of an order
classifying the device, FDA must
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing this classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, FDA issued an order on
September 13, 2010, classifying the
CLEAR 440 Series of hearing aids into
class III, because it was not substantially
equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce for commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, or a
device that was subsequently
reclassified into class I or class II. On
October 13, 2010, Widex Hearing Aid
Co. submitted a petition requesting
classification of the CLEAR 440 Series
of hearing aids under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act. The manufacturer
recommended that the device be
classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
petition in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1). FDA classifies
devices into class II if general controls
by themselves are insufficient to
provide reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness, but there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the petition
and information submitted during
interactive review, FDA determined that
the device can be classified into class II
with the establishment of special
controls. FDA believes these special
controls will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
The device is assigned the generic
name wireless air-conduction hearing
aid, and it is identified as a wearable
sound-amplifying device, intended to
compensate for impaired hearing, that
incorporates wireless technology in its
programming or use.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated with this type of
device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Identified risk
Required measures
Degradations in device function due to electromagnetic interference (EMI) ..................
Degradations in device function due to wireless technology disruption such as slowdown, lost or corrupted information, security issues including potential cross-talk or
control by other users with a similar medical device.
Exposure to non-ionizing radiation emitted by wireless technology can potentially induce tissue heating.
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing; labeling.
Wireless technology design, description, and testing;
performance testing; labeling.
FDA believes that the following
special controls, in addition to general
controls, address the risks to health and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jun 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Wireless technology design, description, analysis, and
testing; labeling.
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device:
(1) Appropriate analysis/testing should
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
validate EMC and safety of exposure to
non-ionizing radiation; (2) Design,
description, and performance data
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
34846
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
should validate wireless technology
functions; and (3) Labeling should
specify appropriate instructions,
warnings, and information relating to
EMC and wireless technology and
human exposure to non-ionizing
radiation. Therefore, on March 31, 2011,
FDA issued an order to the petitioner
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding § 874.3305.
Following the effective date of this
final classification rule, any firm
introducing a wireless air-conduction
hearing aid into interstate commerce in
the United States will need to comply
with the special controls named in the
regulation. However, the firm need only
show that its device meets the
recommendations of the special controls
or in some other way provides
equivalent assurance of safety and
effectiveness.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) if
FDA determines that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type
of device, FDA has determined that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this device type is exempt
from premarket notification
requirements.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
III. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866,
Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). Executive Order
12866 directs Agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The Agency
believes that this final rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:05 Jun 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires Agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because reclassification of this
device from class III to class II will
relieve manufacturers of the device of
the cost of complying with the
premarket approval requirements of
section 515 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360e), and may permit small potential
competitors to enter the marketplace by
lowering their costs, the Agency
certifies that the final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any one year.’’
The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $136 million, using the
most current (2010) Implicit Price
Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product.
FDA does not expect this final rule to
result in any 1-year expenditure that
would meet or exceed this amount.
IV. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a)
of the Executive order requires Agencies
to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal statute to
preempt State law only where the
statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear
evidence that the Congress intended
preemption of State law, or where the
exercise of State authority conflicts with
the exercise of Federal authority under
the Federal statute.’’ Federal law
includes an express preemption
provision that preempts certain state
requirements ‘‘different from or in
addition to’’ certain Federal
requirements applicable to devices. (See
section 521 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360k); See Medtronic v. Lohr, 518 U.S.
470 (1996); Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.,
552 U.S. 312 (2008). The special
controls established by this final rule
create ‘‘requirements’’ for specific
medical devices under 21 U.S.C. 360k,
even though product sponsors have
some flexibility in how they meet those
requirements. (See Papike v.
Tambrands, Inc., 107., 107 F.3d 737,
740–42 (9th Cir. 1997).)
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA concludes that this final rule
contains no new collections of
information. Therefore, clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) is not required.
VI. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
1. Petition from Widex Hearing Aid
Co., dated October 13, 2010.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 874
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 874 is
amended as follows:
PART 874—EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT
DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 874 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
2. Section § 874.3305 is added to
subpart D to read as follows:
■
§ 874.3305 Wireless Air-Conduction
Hearing Aid.
(a) Identification. A wireless airconduction hearing aid is a wearable
sound-amplifying device, intended to
compensate for impaired hearing that
incorporates wireless technology in its
programming or use.
(b) Classification: Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Appropriate analysis/testing
should validate electro magnetic
compatibility (EMC) and safety of
exposure to non-ionizing radiation;
(2) Design, description, and
performance data should validate
wireless technology functions; and
(3) Labeling should specify
appropriate instructions, warnings, and
information relating to EMC and
wireless technology and human
exposure to non-ionizing radiation.
(c) Premarket notification. The
wireless air-conduction hearing aid is
exempt from the premarket notification
procedures in subpart E of part 807 of
this chapter subject to § 874.9.
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
34847
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Nancy K. Stade,
Deputy Director for Policy, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2011–14790 Filed 6–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4022 and 4044
Allocation of Assets in SingleEmployer Plans; Benefits Payable in
Terminated Single-Employer Plans;
Interest Assumptions for Valuing and
Paying Benefits
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s
regulations on Benefits Payable in
Terminated Single-Employer Plans and
Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer
Plans to prescribe interest assumptions
under the benefit payments regulation
for valuation dates in July 2011 and
interest assumptions under the asset
allocation regulation for valuation dates
in the third quarter of 2011. The interest
assumptions are used for valuing and
paying benefits under terminating
single-employer plans covered by the
pension insurance system administered
by PBGC.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine B. Klion
(Klion.Catherine@PBGC.gov), Manager,
Regulatory and Policy Division,
Legislative and Regulatory Department,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005, 202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD users
may call the Federal relay service toll
free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PBGC’s
regulations on Allocation of Assets in
Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part
4044) and Benefits Payable in
Terminated Single-Employer Plans (29
CFR part 4022) prescribe actuarial
assumptions—including interest
assumptions—for valuing and paying
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Rate set
For plans with a valuation
date
On or after
*
213
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Before
*
7–1–11
15:05 Jun 14, 2011
plan benefits under terminating singleemployer plans covered by title IV of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974. The interest
assumptions in the regulations are also
published on PBGC’s Web site (https://
www.pbgc.gov).
The interest assumptions in Appendix
B to Part 4044 are used to value benefits
for allocation purposes under ERISA
section 4044. PBGC uses the interest
assumptions in Appendix B to part 4022
to determine whether a benefit is
payable as a lump sum and to determine
the amount to pay. Appendix C to part
4022 contains interest assumptions for
private-sector pension practitioners to
refer to if they wish to use lump-sum
interest rates determined using PBGC’s
historical methodology. Currently, the
rates in Appendices B and C of the
benefit payment regulation are the same.
The interest assumptions are intended
to reflect current conditions in the
financial and annuity markets.
Assumptions under the asset allocation
regulation are updated quarterly;
assumptions under the benefit payments
regulation are updated monthly. This
final rule updates the benefit payments
interest assumptions for July 2011 and
updates the asset allocation interest
assumptions for the third quarter (July
through September) of 2011.
The third quarter 2011 interest
assumptions under the allocation
regulation will be 4.21 percent for the
first 25 years following the valuation
date and 4.34 percent thereafter. In
comparison with the interest
assumptions in effect for the second
quarter of 2011, these interest
assumptions represent an increase of
five years in the select period (the
period during which the select rate (the
initial rate) applies), an increase of 0.25
percent in the select rate, and an
increase of 0.02 percent in the ultimate
rate (the final rate).
The July 2011 interest assumptions
under the benefit payments regulation
will be 2.25 percent for the period
during which a benefit is in pay status
and 4.00 percent during any years
preceding the benefit’s placement in pay
status. In comparison with the interest
assumptions in effect for June 2011,
these interest assumptions represent a
decrease of 0.25 percent in the
*
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
2.25
Frm 00003
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4022
Employee benefit plans, Pension
insurance, Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
29 CFR Part 4044
Employee benefit plans, Pension
insurance, Pensions.
In consideration of the foregoing, 29
CFR parts 4022 and 4044 are amended
as follows:
PART 4022—BENEFITS PAYABLE IN
TERMINATED SINGLE-EMPLOYER
PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 4022
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302, 1322, 1322b,
1341(c)(3)(D), and 1344.
2. In appendix B to part 4022, Rate Set
213, as set forth below, is added to the
table.
■
Appendix B to Part 4022—Lump Sum
Interest Rates for PBGC Payments
*
*
*
*
*
Deferred annuities
(percent)
Immediate
annuity rate
(percent)
8–1–11
immediate annuity rate and are
otherwise unchanged.
PBGC has determined that notice and
public comment on this amendment are
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This finding is based on the
need to determine and issue new
interest assumptions promptly so that
the assumptions can reflect current
market conditions as accurately as
possible.
Because of the need to provide
immediate guidance for the valuation
and payment of benefits under plans
with valuation dates during July 2011,
PBGC finds that good cause exists for
making the assumptions set forth in this
amendment effective less than 30 days
after publication.
PBGC has determined that this action
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under the criteria set forth in Executive
Order 12866.
Because no general notice of proposed
rulemaking is required for this
amendment, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980 does not apply. See 5 U.S.C.
601(2).
i1
i2
*
4.00
4.00
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
i3
*
n1
*
4.00
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
n2
*
7
8
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34845-34847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14790]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 15, 2011 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 34845]]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 874
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0361]
Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices; Classification of
the Wireless Air-Conduction Hearing Aid
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
wireless air-conduction hearing aid into class II (special controls).
The Agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls)
in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness
of the device.
DATES: This rule is effective July 15, 2011. The classification was
effective on March 31, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vasant Dasika, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 2443, Silver Spring MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5365.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were not
in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of enactment
of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred to as
postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute into
class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain in
class III and require premarket approval, unless and until the device
is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues an
order finding the device to be substantially equivalent, in accordance
with section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate device that does
not require premarket approval. The Agency determines whether new
devices are substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means of
premarket notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 of the regulations (21 CFR part 807).
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act provides that any person who
submits a premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
for a device that has not previously been classified may, within 30
days after receiving an order classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1), request FDA to classify the device under the
criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1). FDA will, within 60 days of
receiving this request, classify the device by written order. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device. Within
30 days after the issuance of an order classifying the device, FDA must
publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing this
classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, FDA issued an
order on September 13, 2010, classifying the CLEAR 440 Series of
hearing aids into class III, because it was not substantially
equivalent to a device that was introduced or delivered for
introduction into interstate commerce for commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, or a device that was subsequently reclassified
into class I or class II. On October 13, 2010, Widex Hearing Aid Co.
submitted a petition requesting classification of the CLEAR 440 Series
of hearing aids under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the device be classified into class II
(Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the petition in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1). FDA classifies devices
into class II if general controls by themselves are insufficient to
provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, but there is
sufficient information to establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the information submitted in the
petition and information submitted during interactive review, FDA
determined that the device can be classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA believes these special controls
will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of
the device.
The device is assigned the generic name wireless air-conduction
hearing aid, and it is identified as a wearable sound-amplifying
device, intended to compensate for impaired hearing, that incorporates
wireless technology in its programming or use.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated with
this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risk Required measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Degradations in device function due to Electromagnetic compatibility
electromagnetic interference (EMI). (EMC) testing; labeling.
Degradations in device function due to Wireless technology design,
wireless technology disruption such as description, and testing;
slow-down, lost or corrupted performance testing;
information, security issues including labeling.
potential cross-talk or control by
other users with a similar medical
device.
Exposure to non-ionizing radiation Wireless technology design,
emitted by wireless technology can description, analysis, and
potentially induce tissue heating. testing; labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that the following special controls, in addition to
general controls, address the risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device: (1)
Appropriate analysis/testing should validate EMC and safety of exposure
to non-ionizing radiation; (2) Design, description, and performance
data
[[Page 34846]]
should validate wireless technology functions; and (3) Labeling should
specify appropriate instructions, warnings, and information relating to
EMC and wireless technology and human exposure to non-ionizing
radiation. Therefore, on March 31, 2011, FDA issued an order to the
petitioner classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding Sec. 874.3305.
Following the effective date of this final classification rule, any
firm introducing a wireless air-conduction hearing aid into interstate
commerce in the United States will need to comply with the special
controls named in the regulation. However, the firm need only show that
its device meets the recommendations of the special controls or in some
other way provides equivalent assurance of safety and effectiveness.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k) if FDA determines that premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the
device. For this type of device, FDA has determined that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device. Therefore, this device type is
exempt from premarket notification requirements.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4). Executive Order 12866 directs Agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Agency
believes that this final rule is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because reclassification of this device from class
III to class II will relieve manufacturers of the device of the cost of
complying with the premarket approval requirements of section 515 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e), and may permit small potential
competitors to enter the marketplace by lowering their costs, the
Agency certifies that the final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $136 million, using the most current (2010) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
IV. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a) of the Executive order
requires Agencies to ``construe * * * a Federal statute to preempt
State law only where the statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear evidence that the Congress
intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of State
authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the
Federal statute.'' Federal law includes an express preemption provision
that preempts certain state requirements ``different from or in
addition to'' certain Federal requirements applicable to devices. (See
section 521 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360k); See Medtronic v. Lohr,
518 U.S. 470 (1996); Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).
The special controls established by this final rule create
``requirements'' for specific medical devices under 21 U.S.C. 360k,
even though product sponsors have some flexibility in how they meet
those requirements. (See Papike v. Tambrands, Inc., 107., 107 F.3d 737,
740-42 (9th Cir. 1997).)
V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA concludes that this final rule contains no new collections of
information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520) is not required.
VI. References
The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. Petition from Widex Hearing Aid Co., dated October 13, 2010.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 874
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
874 is amended as follows:
PART 874--EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 874 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
0
2. Section Sec. 874.3305 is added to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 874.3305 Wireless Air-Conduction Hearing Aid.
(a) Identification. A wireless air-conduction hearing aid is a
wearable sound-amplifying device, intended to compensate for impaired
hearing that incorporates wireless technology in its programming or
use.
(b) Classification: Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Appropriate analysis/testing should validate electro magnetic
compatibility (EMC) and safety of exposure to non-ionizing radiation;
(2) Design, description, and performance data should validate
wireless technology functions; and
(3) Labeling should specify appropriate instructions, warnings, and
information relating to EMC and wireless technology and human exposure
to non-ionizing radiation.
(c) Premarket notification. The wireless air-conduction hearing aid
is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of
part 807 of this chapter subject to Sec. 874.9.
[[Page 34847]]
Dated: June 9, 2011.
Nancy K. Stade,
Deputy Director for Policy, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-14790 Filed 6-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P