National Organic Program; Notice of Draft Guidance for Accredited Certifying Agents and Certified Operations, 34180-34181 [2011-14500]
Download as PDF
34180
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
55. DHS/USCIS–ICE–CBP—001 Alien File,
Index, and National File Tracking System of
Records consists of electronic and paper
records and will be used by USCIS, ICE, and
CBP. DHS/USCIS–ICE–CBP—001 Alien File,
Index, and National File Tracking System of
Records is a repository of information held
by DHS in connection with its several and
varied missions and functions, including, but
not limited to: the enforcement of civil and
criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings thereunder; and national
security and intelligence activities. DHS/
USCIS–ICE–CBP—001 Alien File, Index, and
National File Tracking System of Records
contains information that is collected by, on
behalf of, in support of, or in cooperation
with DHS and its components and may
contain personally identifiable information
collected by other Federal, state, local, Tribal,
territorial, foreign, or international
government agencies. The Secretary of
Homeland Security has exempted this system
from the following provisions of the Privacy
Act, subject to limitations set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (c)(4): (d); (e)(1), (e)(2),
(e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5),
(e)(8), (e)(12); (f); (g)(1); and (h) pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). Additionally, the
Secretary of Homeland Security has
exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to
limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3);
(d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f)
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(2).
Exemptions from these particular subsections
are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for
the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the
records could permit the individual who is
the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Jun 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
impose an unreasonable administrative
burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear, or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of the
investigation, thereby interfering with that
investigation and related law enforcement
activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information could impede law enforcement
by compromising the existence of a
confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses, DHS employees’
identities, or confidential informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f)
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may access and view records pertaining to
themselves in the system would undermine
investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because with the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (e)(12) (Computer
Matching) if the agency is a recipient agency
or a source agency in a matching program
with a non-Federal agency, with respect to
any establishment or revision of a matching
program, at least 30 days prior to conducting
such program, publish in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Register notice of such establishment or
revision.
(j) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies)
to the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
(k) From subsection (h) (Legal Guardians)
the parent of any minor, or the legal guardian
of any individual who has been declared to
be incompetent due to physical or mental
incapacity or age by a court of competent
jurisdiction, may act on behalf of the
individual.
Dated: May 27, 2011.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–14486 Filed 6–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 205
[Doc. AMS–NOP–11–0002; NOP–11–02]
National Organic Program; Notice of
Draft Guidance for Accredited
Certifying Agents and Certified
Operations
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Availability With
Request For Comments.
AGENCY:
The National Organic
Program (NOP) is announcing the
availability of four draft guidance
documents intended for use by
accredited certifying agents and
certified operations. The draft guidance
documents are entitled as follows: ‘‘The
Use of Kelp in Organic Livestock Feed
(NOP 5027)’’; ‘‘Responding to Results
from Pesticide Residue Testing (NOP
5028)’’; ‘‘Seeds, Annual Seedlings, and
Planting Stock in Organic Crop
Production (NOP 5029)’’; and
‘‘Evaluating Allowed Ingredients and
Sources of Vitamins and Minerals For
Organic Livestock Feed, Feed
Supplements, and Feed Additives (NOP
5030)’’.
These draft guidance documents are
intended to inform the public of NOP’s
current thinking on these topics. A
notice of availability of final guidance
on these topics will be issued upon their
final approval. Once finalized, these
guidance documents will be available
from the NOP through ‘‘The Program
Handbook: Guidance and Instructions
for Accredited Certifying Agents (ACAs)
and Certified Operations.
DATES: To ensure that NOP considers
your comment on this draft guidance
before it begins work on the final
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
version of the guidance, submit written
comments on the draft guidance by
August 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
hard copies of these draft guidance
documents to Toni Strother,
Agricultural Marketing Specialist,
National Organic Program, USDA–
AMS–NOP, 1400 Independence Ave.,
SW., Room 2646 So., Ag Stop 0268,
Washington, DC 20250–0268. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance
documents.
Interested persons may comment on
these four draft guidance documents
using the following procedures:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Comments may be submitted by
mail to: Toni Strother, Agricultural
Marketing Specialist, National Organic
Program, USDA–AMS–NOP, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Room 2646
So., Ag Stop 0268, Washington, DC
20250–0268.
Written comments responding to this
request should be identified with the
document number AMS–NOP–11–0002;
NOP–11–02. You should clearly
indicate your position and the reasons
for your position. You should clearly
indicate which guidance document you
are commenting on, especially if you
choose to comment on more than one
draft guidance document. If you are
suggesting changes to a draft guidance
document, you should include
recommended language changes, as
appropriate, along with any relevant
supporting documentation.
USDA intends to make available all
comments, including names and
addresses when provided, regardless of
submission procedure used, on https://
www.regulations.gov and at USDA,
AMS, NOP, Room 2646–South building,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC, from 9 a.m. to noon
and from 1 to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except official Federal holidays).
Persons wanting to visit the USDA
South building to view comments from
the public to this notice are requested to
make an appointment by calling (202)
720–3252.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa R. Bailey, PhD, Director,
Standards Division, National Organic
Program (NOP), USDA–AMS–NOP,
1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room
2646–So., Ag Stop 0268, Washington,
DC 20250–0268, Telephone: (202) 720–
3252, E-mail:
NOP.guidance@ams.usda.gov, or visit
the NOP Web site at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/nop.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Jun 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
I. Background
The NOP selected the topics for the
four draft guidance documents
announced through this notice in
response to recommendations issued by
the National Organic Standards Board
(NOSB) and the need to improve
consistency in how certifying agents
and certified operations are
implementing the NOP regulations at 7
CFR part 205. The NOP developed
‘‘Seeds, Annual Seedlings, and Planting
Stock in Organic Crop Production (NOP
5029)’’, and ‘‘Evaluating Allowed
Ingredients and Sources of Vitamins and
Minerals For Organic Livestock Feed,
Feed Supplements, and Feed Additives
(NOP 5030)’’ in response to outstanding
NOSB recommendations from May
2002, February 2005, and November
2008. The NOP developed ‘‘The Use of
Kelp in Organic Livestock Feed (NOP
5027)’’ in response to requests by
certifying agents and certified
operations for clarifications on this
issue. The NOP developed ‘‘Responding
to Results from Pesticide Residue
Testing (NOP 5028)’’ to describe the
reporting scheme and actions that
certifying agents should be instituting to
meet the requirements at § 205.670 of
the NOP regulations.
II. Significance of Guidance
These draft guidance documents are
being issued in accordance with the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Bulletin on Agency Good
Guidance Practices (GGPs) (January 25,
2007, 72 FR 3432–3440).
The purpose of GGPs is to ensure that
program guidance documents are
developed with adequate public
participation, are readily available to the
public, and are not applied as binding
requirements. The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the NOP’s
current thinking on these topics. It does
not create or confer any rights for, or on,
any person and does not operate to bind
the NOP or the public. Guidance
documents are intended to provide a
uniform method for operations to
comply that can reduce the burden of
developing their own methods and
simplify audits and inspections.
Alternative approaches that can
demonstrate compliance with the
Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA),
as amended (7 U.S.C. 6501–6522), and
its implementing regulations are also
acceptable. As with any alternative
compliance approach, the NOP strongly
encourages industry to discuss
alternative approaches with the NOP
before implementing them to avoid
unnecessary or wasteful expenditures of
resources and to ensure the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34181
alternative approach complies with the
Act and its implementing regulations.
Electronic Access
Persons with access to Internet may
obtain the draft guidance at either
NOP’s Web site at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/nop or https://
www.regulations.gov. Requests for hard
copies of the draft guidance documents
can be obtained by submitting a written
request to the person listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this Notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501–6522.
Dated: June 7, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–14500 Filed 6–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0099; FV11–983–1
PR]
Pistachios Grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico; Proposed
Amendments to Marketing Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Four amendments to
Marketing Agreement and Order No.
983, which regulates the handling of
pistachios grown in California, Arizona,
and New Mexico, were proposed by the
Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (Committee), which is
responsible for local administration of
the order. The proposed amendments
would provide authority to establish
aflatoxin and quality regulations for
pistachios shipped to export markets,
including authority to establish different
regulations for different markets. The
order currently provides authority for
aflatoxin and quality regulations only
for pistachios shipped to domestic
markets. These proposed amendments
are intended to provide authority to
ensure uniform and consistent aflatoxin
and quality regulations in the domestic
and various export markets.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34180-34181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14500]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 205
[Doc. AMS-NOP-11-0002; NOP-11-02]
National Organic Program; Notice of Draft Guidance for Accredited
Certifying Agents and Certified Operations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Availability With Request For Comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Organic Program (NOP) is announcing the
availability of four draft guidance documents intended for use by
accredited certifying agents and certified operations. The draft
guidance documents are entitled as follows: ``The Use of Kelp in
Organic Livestock Feed (NOP 5027)''; ``Responding to Results from
Pesticide Residue Testing (NOP 5028)''; ``Seeds, Annual Seedlings, and
Planting Stock in Organic Crop Production (NOP 5029)''; and
``Evaluating Allowed Ingredients and Sources of Vitamins and Minerals
For Organic Livestock Feed, Feed Supplements, and Feed Additives (NOP
5030)''.
These draft guidance documents are intended to inform the public of
NOP's current thinking on these topics. A notice of availability of
final guidance on these topics will be issued upon their final
approval. Once finalized, these guidance documents will be available
from the NOP through ``The Program Handbook: Guidance and Instructions
for Accredited Certifying Agents (ACAs) and Certified Operations.
DATES: To ensure that NOP considers your comment on this draft guidance
before it begins work on the final
[[Page 34181]]
version of the guidance, submit written comments on the draft guidance
by August 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for hard copies of these draft
guidance documents to Toni Strother, Agricultural Marketing Specialist,
National Organic Program, USDA-AMS-NOP, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Room 2646 So., Ag Stop 0268, Washington, DC 20250-0268. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft
guidance documents.
Interested persons may comment on these four draft guidance
documents using the following procedures:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Comments may be submitted by mail to: Toni Strother,
Agricultural Marketing Specialist, National Organic Program, USDA-AMS-
NOP, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Room 2646 So., Ag Stop 0268,
Washington, DC 20250-0268.
Written comments responding to this request should be identified
with the document number AMS-NOP-11-0002; NOP-11-02. You should clearly
indicate your position and the reasons for your position. You should
clearly indicate which guidance document you are commenting on,
especially if you choose to comment on more than one draft guidance
document. If you are suggesting changes to a draft guidance document,
you should include recommended language changes, as appropriate, along
with any relevant supporting documentation.
USDA intends to make available all comments, including names and
addresses when provided, regardless of submission procedure used, on
https://www.regulations.gov and at USDA, AMS, NOP, Room 2646-South
building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC, from 9 a.m. to
noon and from 1 to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday (except official
Federal holidays). Persons wanting to visit the USDA South building to
view comments from the public to this notice are requested to make an
appointment by calling (202) 720-3252.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa R. Bailey, PhD, Director,
Standards Division, National Organic Program (NOP), USDA-AMS-NOP, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Room 2646-So., Ag Stop 0268, Washington, DC
20250-0268, Telephone: (202) 720-3252, E-mail:
NOP.guidance@ams.usda.gov, or visit the NOP Web site at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/nop.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The NOP selected the topics for the four draft guidance documents
announced through this notice in response to recommendations issued by
the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) and the need to improve
consistency in how certifying agents and certified operations are
implementing the NOP regulations at 7 CFR part 205. The NOP developed
``Seeds, Annual Seedlings, and Planting Stock in Organic Crop
Production (NOP 5029)'', and ``Evaluating Allowed Ingredients and
Sources of Vitamins and Minerals For Organic Livestock Feed, Feed
Supplements, and Feed Additives (NOP 5030)'' in response to outstanding
NOSB recommendations from May 2002, February 2005, and November 2008.
The NOP developed ``The Use of Kelp in Organic Livestock Feed (NOP
5027)'' in response to requests by certifying agents and certified
operations for clarifications on this issue. The NOP developed
``Responding to Results from Pesticide Residue Testing (NOP 5028)'' to
describe the reporting scheme and actions that certifying agents should
be instituting to meet the requirements at Sec. 205.670 of the NOP
regulations.
II. Significance of Guidance
These draft guidance documents are being issued in accordance with
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Bulletin on Agency Good
Guidance Practices (GGPs) (January 25, 2007, 72 FR 3432-3440).
The purpose of GGPs is to ensure that program guidance documents
are developed with adequate public participation, are readily available
to the public, and are not applied as binding requirements. The draft
guidance, when finalized, will represent the NOP's current thinking on
these topics. It does not create or confer any rights for, or on, any
person and does not operate to bind the NOP or the public. Guidance
documents are intended to provide a uniform method for operations to
comply that can reduce the burden of developing their own methods and
simplify audits and inspections. Alternative approaches that can
demonstrate compliance with the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA), as
amended (7 U.S.C. 6501-6522), and its implementing regulations are also
acceptable. As with any alternative compliance approach, the NOP
strongly encourages industry to discuss alternative approaches with the
NOP before implementing them to avoid unnecessary or wasteful
expenditures of resources and to ensure the proposed alternative
approach complies with the Act and its implementing regulations.
Electronic Access
Persons with access to Internet may obtain the draft guidance at
either NOP's Web site at https://www.ams.usda.gov/nop or https://www.regulations.gov. Requests for hard copies of the draft guidance
documents can be obtained by submitting a written request to the person
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501-6522.
Dated: June 7, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-14500 Filed 6-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P