Taking and Importing Marine Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Navy Training Exercises in Three East Coast Range Complexes, 33266-33270 [2011-14148]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
33266
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2011 / Notices
populations, and cumulative impacts
when taking into account successive/
contemporaneous actions when added
to baseline data);
(4) The status of stock or species of
marine mammals (i.e., depleted, not
depleted, decreasing, increasing, stable,
impact relative to the size of the
population);
(5) Impacts on habitat affecting rates
of recruitment/survival; and
(6) The effectiveness of monitoring
and mitigation measures.
As mentioned previously, NMFS
estimates that 12 species of marine
mammals could be potentially affected
by Level B harassment over the course
of the IHA. For each species, these
numbers are small (each, less than one
percent) relative to the population size.
No injuries, serious injuries, or
mortalities are anticipated to occur as a
result of the USGS’s planned marine
seismic survey, and none are
authorized. Only short-term behavioral
disturbance is anticipated to occur due
to the brief and sporadic duration of the
survey activities. No mortality or injury
is expected to occur, and due to the
nature, degree, and context of
behavioral harassment anticipated, the
activity is not expected to impact rates
of recruitment or survival.
NMFS has preliminarily determined,
provided that the aforementioned
mitigation and monitoring measures are
implemented, that the impact of
conducting a marine geophysical survey
in the central-western Bering Sea,
August, 2011, may result, at worst, in a
temporary modification in behavior
and/or low-level physiological effects
(Level B harassment) of small numbers
of certain species of marine mammals.
While behavioral modifications,
including temporarily vacating the area
during the operation of the airgun(s),
may be made by these species to avoid
the resultant acoustic disturbance, the
availability of alternate areas within
these areas and the short and sporadic
duration of the research activities, have
led NMFS to preliminary determine that
this action will have a negligible impact
on the species in the specified
geographic region.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
mitigation and monitoring measures,
NMFS preliminarily finds that USGS’s
planned research activities, will result
in the incidental take of small numbers
of marine mammals, by Level B
harassment only, and that the total
taking from the marine seismic survey
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:51 Jun 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
will have a negligible impact on the
affected species or stocks.
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species or Stock for Taking for
Subsistence Uses
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
also requires NMFS to determine that
the authorization will not have an
unmitigable adverse effect on the
availability of marine mammal species
or stocks for subsistence use. There are
no relevant subsistence uses of marine
mammals in the study area (deep,
offshore waters of the central-western
Bering Sea) that implicate MMPA
section 101(a)(5)(D).
Endangered Species Act
Of the species of marine mammals
that may occur in the proposed survey
area, several are listed as endangered
under the ESA, including the North
Pacific right, humpback, sei, fin, blue,
and sperm whales, as well as the
western stock of Steller sea lions. The
eastern stock of Steller sea lions is listed
as threatened. Under section 7 of the
ESA, USGS has initiated formal
consultation with the NMFS, Office of
Protected Resources, Endangered
Species Division, on this proposed
seismic survey. NMFS’s Office of
Protected Resources, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
has initiated formal consultation under
section 7 of the ESA with NMFS’ Office
of Protected Resources, Endangered
Species Division, to obtain a Biological
Opinion evaluating the effects of issuing
the IHA on threatened and endangered
marine mammals and, if appropriate,
authorizing incidental take. NMFS will
conclude formal section 7 consultation
prior to making a determination on
whether or not to issue the IHA. If the
IHA is issued, USGS, in addition to the
mitigation and monitoring requirements
included in the IHA, will be required to
comply with the Terms and Conditions
of the Incidental Take Statement
corresponding to NMFS’s Biological
Opinion issued to both USGS and
NMFS’s Office of Protected Resources.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
With its complete application, USGS
provided NMFS an EA analyzing the
direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental impacts of the proposed
specified activities on marine mammals
including those listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA. The EA,
prepared by LGL on behalf of USGS is
entitled ‘‘Environmental Assessment of a
Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V
MARCUS G. LANGSETH in the centralwestern Bering Sea, August 2011.’’ Prior
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to making a final decision on the IHA
application, NMFS will either prepare
an independent EA, or, after review and
evaluation of the USGS EA for
consistency with the regulations
published by the Council of
Environmental Quality (CEQ) and
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6,
Environmental Review Procedures for
Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act, adopt the
USGS EA and make a decision of
whether or not to issue a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI).
Proposed Authorization
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to
USGS for conducting a marine
geophysical survey in the centralwestern Bering Sea, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated. The duration of the
IHA would not exceed one year from the
date of its issuance.
Information Solicited
NMFS requests interested persons to
submit comments and information
concerning this proposed project and
NMFS’ preliminary determination of
issuing an IHA (see ADDRESSES).
Concurrent with the publication of this
notice in the Federal Register, NMFS is
forwarding copies of this application to
the Marine Mammal Commission and
its Committee of Scientific Advisors.
Dated: June 1, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–14136 Filed 6–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA372
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Navy Training Exercises
in Three East Coast Range Complexes
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of three Letters
of Authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), as amended, and
implementing regulations, notification
is hereby given that NMFS has issued
three one-year Letters of Authorization
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2011 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(LOAs) to take marine mammals by
harassment incidental to the U.S. Navy’s
training activities within the Navy’s
Virginia Capes (VACAPES), Jacksonville
(JAX), and Cherry Point (CHPT) Range
Complexes to the Commander, U.S.
Fleet Forces Command, 1562 Mitscher
Avenue, Suite 250, Norfolk, VA 23551–
2487 and persons operating under his
authority.
DATES: Effective from June 5, 2011,
through June 4, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Navy’s
January 2011 LOA applications, the
LOAs, the Navy’s 2010 marine mammal
monitoring report and the Navy’s 2010
exercise report are available by writing
to P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation, and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, by telephoning the contact listed
here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT), or online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS (301) 713–2289 x 137.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) directs the Secretary
of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a military readiness activity if
certain findings are made and
regulations are issued.
Authorization may be granted for
periods of 5 years or less if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), and
will not have an unmitigable adverse
impact on the availability of the species
or stock(s) for certain subsistence uses.
In addition, NMFS must prescribe
regulations that include permissible
methods of taking and other means
effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on the species and its habitat,
and on the availability of the species for
subsistence uses, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds,
and areas of similar significance. The
regulations also must include
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
Regulations governing the taking of
marine mammals incidental to the U.S.
Navy’s training activities at the Navy’s
VACAPES, JAX, and Cherry Point range
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:51 Jun 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
complexes were published on June 15,
2009 (VACAPES: 74 FR 28328; JAX: 74
FR 28349; CHPT: 74 FR 28370) and
remain in effect through June 4, 2014.
They are codified at 50 CFR part 218
subpart A (for VACAPES Range
Complex), subpart B (for JAX Range
Complex), and subpart C (for Cherry
Point Range Complex). These
regulations include mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
for the incidental taking of marine
mammals by the Navy’s range complex
training exercises. For detailed
information on these actions, please
refer to the June 15, 2009 Federal
Register Notices and 50 CFR part 218
subparts A, B, and C. An interim final
rule for the modification of certain Navy
training activities at VACAPES and JAX
was published on May 26, 2011 (76 FR
30552).
Summary of LOA Request
NMFS received an application from
the U.S. Navy for three LOAs covering
the Navy’s training activities at the
VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT range
complexes off the US East Coast under
the regulations issued on June 15, 2009
(VACAPES: 74 FR 28328; JAX: 74 FR
28349; Cherry Point: 74 FR 28370). The
Navy requested several minor
modifications to their training activities
within the VACAPES and JAX Range
Complexes starting in 2011 (see detailed
description in ‘‘Planned Activities for
2011’’ section), and requested that these
LOAs become effective on June 5, 2011.
In order to allow for the Navy’s
proposed modification in its training
activities at VACAPES and JAX range
complexes, NMFS issued an interim
final rule (76 FR 30552; May 26, 2011)
to allow flexibilities in the Navy’s
evolving training programs as long as
the impacts to the environment do not
exceed the impacts analyzed in the
original regulations for these range
complexes. The application requested
authorization, for a period not to exceed
one year, to take, by harassment, marine
mammals incidental to proposed
training activities that involve
underwater explosives.
Summary of Activity Under the 2010
VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT LOAs
As described in the Navy’s exercise
reports for VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT
Range Complexes, in 2010, the training
activities conducted by the Navy were
within the scope and amounts
contemplated by the final rule and
identified by the 2010 LOAs. In fact, the
number of training exercises was below
the Navy’s proposed 2010 operations,
except for mine exercises (MINEX) at
VACAPES Range Complex, which
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33267
exceeded the annual planned amount of
24 events by an extra 31 events.
However, this level is still under the
total of 120 events authorized under the
5-year rule, and the take of marine
mammals was still below that
authorized in the LOAs. A detailed
description of the Navy’s 2010 training
activities can be found in the exercise
reports posted on NMFS Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Planned Activities for 2011
In 2011, the Navy plans to make some
minor modifications to its training
activities at the VACAPES and JAX
range complexes, while maintaining the
same type and amount of training
activities at the CHPT Range Complex,
as compared to the final rules and the
2010 LOAs. A detailed description of
these proposed modifications is
provided below.
Modification for Training at VACAPES
Range Complex
Within the VACAPES Range
Complex, the Navy estimates an
increase in the number of MINEX
training events. In June 2009, NMFS
specified 20 lb NEW charges for
VACAPES Range Complex based on the
Navy’s preliminary estimate of 24
events at the time of the original
Request for Letter of Authorization. To
accommodate emergent MINEX training
requirements, the Navy requested a
revised authorization of 9 5-lb NEW
charges, 150 10-lb NEW charges, and
160 20-lb NEW charges per year, as
listed in Table 1. No change is requested
for MINEX using the Airborne Mine
Neutralization System (AMNS).
Training using 5-, 10-, and 20-lb NEW
charges during MINEX would occur at
the same locations in VACAPES where
previous 20-lb NEW charges would
typically occur. These locations are the
same MINEX training areas described
under NMFS June 15, 2009, final rule
(VACAPES: 74 FR 28328).
In addition, the Navy estimates an
increase in the number of bombing
exercise (BOMBEX) training events.
However, instead of training with the
MK–83 (1,000 lb) bombs, training will
use the MK–82 (500 lb) bombs. In June
2009, NMFS authorized 20 MK–83
bombs per year for VACAPES Range
Complex based on the Navy’s
preliminary estimate at the time of the
original Request for Letter of
Authorization. To accommodate an
increased need for BOMBEX training
based on changes to training
requirements, the Navy requests that
MK–82 bombs be added to the list of
ordnance for BOMBEX. For 2011–2013,
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
33268
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2011 / Notices
the Navy anticipates 40 MK–82 (500 lb)
bombs and no MK–83 (1,000 lb) bombs
will be used per year, as listed in Table
1. Although the number of bombs
requested is increasing, the type of
bomb (MK–82) is smaller (500 lb) and
has fewer explosives, and therefore the
potential exposures are reduced.
Training using MK–82 bombs during
BOMBEX would occur at the same
location in VACAPES Range Complex
where MK–83 bomb use would typically
occur. This location is the same
BOMBEX training area described under
NMFS June 15, 2009, final rule
(VACAPES: 74 FR 28328).
Modification for Training at JAX Range
Complex
With in the JAX Range Complex, the
Navy estimates a reduction in the
number of MINEX 20-lb NEW charge
training events. In June 2009, NMFS
authorized 12 events using 20-lb NEW
charges per year for JAX Range Complex
based on the Navy’s preliminary
estimate at the time of the original
Request for Letter of Authorization.
Given new information on planned
Fleet MINEX training that was not
previously available, the Navy requested
a revised authorization for 10 MINEX
events per year as listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1—COMPARISON OF CHANGES FOR ANNUAL TRAINING ACTIVITIES STARTING FROM 2011 AT THE VACAPES AND
JAX RANGE COMPLEXES
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
VACAPES Range Complex
MINEX (5-lb NEW charges) .................................................
MINEX (10-lb NEW charges) ...............................................
MINEX (20-lb NEW charges) ...............................................
BOMBEX (MK–82 bombs) ...................................................
BOMBEX (MK–83 bombs) ...................................................
0
0
24
0
20
0
0
24
0
20
9
150
160
40
0
9
150
160
40
0
9
150
160
40
0
12
3
10
0
12
10
5
5
10
10
5
5
10
10
5
5
JAX Range Complex
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
MINEX (20-lb NEW charges) ...............................................
MISSILEX (Maverick missiles) .............................................
FIREX with IMPASS (BB & CC box) ...................................
FIREX with IMPASS (JAX Deepwater Site) ........................
In addition, the Navy estimates an
increase in the number of Maverick
missile exercise (MISSILEX) training
events. In June 2009, NMFS authorized
3 events using Maverick missiles per
year for training at the JAX Range
Complex based on the Navy’s
preliminary estimate at the time of
original Request for Letter of
Authorizations submission. To
accommodate an increased need for
Maverick MISSILEX training based on
changes to training requirements, the
Navy requested a revised authorization
of 10 events using Maverick missiles per
year as listed in Table 1.
Finally, the Navy requires an
additional training location for firing
exercise (FIREX) with Integrated
Maritime Portable Acoustic Scoring and
Simulation System (IMPASS) training
events. In June 2009, NMFS authorized
10 FIREX with IMPASS events per year
for JAX Range Complex within the BB
and CC boxes based on the preliminary
estimate available at the time of the
original Request for Letter of
Authorization. Given new information
on planned Fleet FIREX with IMPASS
training that was not previously
available, the Navy requested a revised
annual authorization for FIREX with
IMPASS events to also occur in the new
proposed FIREX with IMPASS training
location, the JAX Deepwater IMPASS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:51 Jun 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
12
3
10
0
Site further offshore. The Navy also
requested a reduction in the number of
events occurring at the BB and CC sites.
The total number of events from training
at both locations remains the same (10
events).
No modification is proposed by the
Navy for its planned 2011 activities at
the CHPT Range Complex.
In addition, due to a recent
underwater detonation (UNDET)
training event during which common
dolphins were killed, the Navy is
suspending all underwater explosive
detonations using time-delay devices
during training. While this suspension
is in place, the Navy will continue to
conduct UNDETs under positive
control, when detonation can be
suspended if a marine mammal enters a
pre-established safety zone. For these
events, the Navy shall continue to
follow all UNDET training mitigation
measures as outlined in the final rule
and the LOA.
Estimated Take for 2011
The estimated takes for the Navy’s
proposed 2011 training exercises are the
same as those authorized in 2010. No
change has been made in the estimated
takes from the 2009 LOAs.
Although the Navy has made several
changes to its training activities within
the VACAPES and JAX range
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complexes, the calculation of exposures
for these changes were completed by the
Navy using the same model, criteria,
and location originally used to calculate
exposures from these activities when
the Navy applied for the LOAs. The
methodology is described on pages 6—
21 of the original VACAPES LOA
application (DoN 2008a) and pages 6—
17 of the original JAX LOA application
(DoN 2008b), respectively.
For the MINEX activities within the
VACAPES Range Complex, the change
from 24 20-lb NEW charges to 9 5-lb
NEW charges, 150 10-lb NEW charges,
and 160 20-lb NEW charges would
result in an additional 7 Level B
exposures and 1 Level A exposure.
For the BOMBEX activities within the
VACAPES Range Complex, the change
from 20 MK–83 (1,000 lb) bombs to 40
MK–82 (500 lb) bombs would result in
a reduction of 313 Level B exposures
and 4 Level A exposures.
A detailed description of these
changes by species in Level A and Level
B exposure at the VACAPES Range
Complex is shown in Table 2. While the
annual exposures anticipated from the
requested changes are less than the
amount of take originally authorized as
a result of the conservative analyses, the
amount of annual take requested
remains the same as in the original
authorization.
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
33269
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 2—CHANGES OF MODELED EXPOSURES BY SPECIES AT THE VACAPES RANGE COMPLEX
Original modeled exposure
Species
Revised modeled exposure
0
0
1
0
2
2
4
1
+2
+2
+3
+1
B
B
B
A
9
17
31
2,059
64
11
17
1
7
15
26
1,766
55
9
15
0
-2
-2
-5
-293
-9
-2
-2
-1
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
MINEX:
Bottlenose Dolphin ...................................................................................
Clymene dolphin .......................................................................................
Pantropical spotted dolphin ......................................................................
Pantropical spotted dolphin ......................................................................
BOMBEX:
Atlantic spotted dolphin ............................................................................
Bottlenose dolphin ....................................................................................
Clymene dolphin .......................................................................................
Common dolphin ......................................................................................
Pantropical spotted dolphin ......................................................................
Risso’s dolphin .........................................................................................
Common dolphin ......................................................................................
Pantropical spotted dolphin ......................................................................
For the MINEX activities within the
JAX Range Complex, the change from 12
20-lb NEW charges to 10 20-lb NEW
charges would result in no change in
exposure numbers.
For the MISSILEX activities within
the JAX Range Complex, the change
from 3 Maverick missiles to 10 Maverick
missiles would result in an additional 4
Level B exposures.
For the FIREX with IMPASS activities
within the JAX Range Complex, the
change from 10 events in BB and CC
boxes to 5 events in BB and CC boxes
and 5 events in the new JAX Deepwater
IMPASS Site would result in a
reduction of 15 Level B exposures and
1 Level A exposure. This reduction of
exposures is mainly due to the lower
marine mammal density at the JAX
Deepwater IMPASS Site.
Change
Level
A detailed description of these
changes by species in Level A and Level
B exposure at the JAX Range Complex
is shown in Table 3. While the annual
exposures anticipated from the
requested changes are less than the
amount of take originally authorized as
a result of the conservative analyses, the
amount of annual take requested
remains the same as in the original
authorization.
TABLE 3—CHANGES OF MODELED EXPOSURES BY SPECIES AT THE JAX RANGE COMPLEX
Original modeled exposure
Species
Revised modeled exposure
1
5
+4
B
23
10
1
1
1
3
1
12
6
0
2
2
2
0
-11
-4
-1
+1
+1
-1
-1
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
MISSILEX:
Atlantic spotted dolphin ...................................................................................
FIREX with IMPASS:
Atlantic spotted dolphin ...................................................................................
Bottlenose Dolphin ...........................................................................................
Clymene dolphin ..............................................................................................
Pantropical spotted dolphin .............................................................................
Pilot whale .......................................................................................................
Risso’s dolphin .................................................................................................
Atlantic spotted dolphin ...................................................................................
proposed. No training exercise was
conducted at the Cherry Point Range
Complex, though a total of 38 exercises
were proposed.
Summary of Monitoring, Reporting,
and Other Requirements Under the
2010 LOA
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Annual Exercise Reports
The Navy submitted their 2010
exercise report within the required
timeframes and it is posted on NMFS
Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm. NMFS has
reviewed the report and it contains the
information required by the 2010 LOAs.
The report lists the amount of training
exercises conducted between June 2010
and January 2011. For training exercises
conducted at the VACAPES Range
Complex, the Navy conducted 77
exercises out of the total of 176
proposed. For training exercises at the
JAX Range Complex, the Navy
conducted 14 out of 175 exercises
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:51 Jun 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Monitoring and Annual Monitoring
Reports
The Navy conducted the monitoring
required by the 2010 LOA and described
in the Monitoring Plan, which included
aerial and vessel surveys of training
exercises by marine mammal observers.
The Navy submitted their 2010
Monitoring Report, which is posted on
NMFS’ Web site (https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm), within the required
timeframe. The Navy included a
summary of their 2010 monitoring effort
and results (beginning on page 3 of the
monitoring report).
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Change
Level
Based on the Navy’s monitoring
report, approximately 107 cetaceans
were sighted from 7 sightings during the
MINEX vessel visual survey and FIREX
visual survey on August 9 and 10, 2010,
respectively. These cetaceans include 65
common dolphins, 12 bottlenose
dolphins, 6 Risso’s dolphins, 10
Atlantic spotted dolphins, and 14
unidentified cetacean species. None of
these animals were expected to be
affected because they were all outside
the take zones.
In addition, approximately 172
cetaceans were sighted from 11
sightings during the MISSILEX
(Maverick) aerial visual survey on
August 9, 2010, and during the FIREX
aerial visual surveys on October 5 and
6, 2010. These cetaceans include
approximately 100 Atlantic spotted
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
33270
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2011 / Notices
dolphins, 51 bottlenose dolphins, and
21 unidentified cetacean species. Most
of the cetaceans were sighted either
outside the take zone or before the Navy
exercise, and were not expected to be
affected. Only one bottlenose dolphin
was sighted approximately 68 yards
from the vessel during a break between
the 1st and 2nd round of FIREX event.
No unusual behavior was observed from
the bottlenose dolphin, and the area was
monitored for 30 minutes after the
sighting, without the animal being
sighted again, before training activities
were resumed.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Integrated Comprehensive Management
Program (ICMP) Plan
The ICMP will be used both as: (1) A
planning tool to focus Navy monitoring
priorities (pursuant to ESA/MMPA
requirements) across Navy Range
Complexes and Exercises; and (2) an
adaptive management tool, through the
consolidation and analysis of the Navy’s
monitoring and marine observer data, as
well as new information from other
Navy programs (e.g., research and
development), and other appropriate
newly published information. The Navy
updated its 2010 ICMP Plan and will
comply with the Plan. The ICMP may be
viewed at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm.
NOAA Workshops
In a January 19, 2010, letter to the
Council on Environmental Quality,
NOAA identified the need for two
interrelated workshops on marine
mammals and sound in the ocean. To
address this commitment, NOAA is
convening two parallel, focused,
relatively small, and product-driven
working groups. One will identify and
map cetacean ‘‘hot spots’’, defined as
areas of known, or reasonably
predictable, biological importance (i.e.,
for reproduction, feeding, migration)
and/or high densities. The second
working group will be directed toward
developing a comprehensive data
collection and analysis plan for
describing and predicting underwater
sound fields in different areas. The
outcomes of these working groups will
be integrated and analyzed in a broader
follow-on symposium to include a larger
audience of scientists, industries,
federal agencies, conservation managers,
and environmental NGOs. The final
products and analyses will provide a
more robust, comprehensive, and
context-specific biological and acoustic
basis by which to inform subsequent
management decisions regarding human
noise in our oceans. The steering
committee has been convened and met
for the first time in October 2010. Both
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:51 Jun 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
working groups had their first meeting
in March 2011 in Boston, MA. The
working group efforts should take about
a year to complete, and we expect the
final symposium to be held in early
2012. The results of these working
groups will be analyzed by NMFS in an
adaptive management context, as related
to the three east coast training ranges
final rules, and mitigation or monitoring
measures may be modified, as
appropriate.
Adaptive Management
NMFS and the Navy conducted an
adaptive management meeting in
October 2010 wherein we reviewed the
Navy monitoring results through August
1, 2010, discussed other Navy research
and development efforts, and discussed
other new information that could
potentially inform decisions regarding
Navy mitigation and monitoring. Based
on the review, NMFS determines that
the Navy’s current monitoring plans for
the VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT range
complexes are robust and no changes
are warranted.
In terms of the Navy’s proposed
modification for its future training
activities, NMFS conducted a thorough
analysis and issued an interim final rule
to allow flexibility in the Navy’s
training program, as long as the effects
on marine mammal species and their
habitat are within the scope of NMFS’
analysis conducted in 2009 for the
initial final rules governing
authorization of these actions (see
Planned Activities for 2011 section
above).
Authorization
The Navy complied with the
requirements of the 2010 LOAs. Based
on our review of the record, NMFS has
determined that the marine mammal
take resulting from the 2010 military
readiness training and research
activities falls within the levels
previously anticipated, analyzed, and
authorized, and was likely lower given
the fact that Navy conducted fewer
operations in 2010 than originally
planned. Further, the level of taking
authorized in 2011 for the Navy’s
training exercises at VACAPES, JAX,
and CHPT range complexes is consistent
with our previous findings made for the
total taking allowed under these range
complexes regulations. Finally, the
record supports NMFS’ conclusion that
the total number of marine mammals
taken by the 2011 training exercises at
VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT range
complexes will have no more than a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stock of marine mammals and will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on the availability of these species or
stocks for taking for subsistence uses.
Accordingly, NMFS has issued three
one-year LOAs for Navy training
exercises conducted at these East Coast
range complexes from June 5, 2011,
through June 4, 2012.
Dated: June 1, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–14148 Filed 6–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Cancellation of the Notice of Intent To
Prepare a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Geothermal
Development Program, Naval Air
Facility El Centro, Imperial County, CA
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Navy
(DoN) announces the cancellation of its
Notice of Intent to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS) for the proposed
Geothermal Development Program,
Naval Air Facility El Centro, Imperial
County, CA, as published in the Federal
Register, May 5, 2008 (73 FR 87). It has
been determined that preparation of a
PEIS is not appropriate at this time
when considering the current project
scale and stage of geothermal energy
development at Superstition Mountain
on Naval Air Facility El Centro. The
DoN will develop an internal document
known as an environmental and
operational feasibility study. This
internal document will analyze the
environmental and operational
framework within which a geothermal
development may proceed and will
provide the DoN with information
required to determine the DoN’s
geothermal energy program needs at
Naval Air Facility El Centro. Should
geothermal development be indicated as
feasible and a project to be developed,
the appropriate level of National
Environmental Policy Act analysis and
process will be performed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Bjornstad, United States Navy
Geothermal Program Office (PW–8),
Naval Air Weapons Station, 429 East
Bowen Road, Mail Stop 4011, China
Lake, CA 93555–6108, telephone: 760–
939–4048, e-mail:
steven.bjornstad@navy.mil.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33266-33270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14148]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XA372
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Navy Training Exercises in Three East Coast Range
Complexes
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of three Letters of Authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended, and implementing regulations, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued three one-year Letters of Authorization
[[Page 33267]]
(LOAs) to take marine mammals by harassment incidental to the U.S.
Navy's training activities within the Navy's Virginia Capes (VACAPES),
Jacksonville (JAX), and Cherry Point (CHPT) Range Complexes to the
Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, 1562 Mitscher Avenue, Suite 250,
Norfolk, VA 23551-2487 and persons operating under his authority.
DATES: Effective from June 5, 2011, through June 4, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Navy's January 2011 LOA applications, the
LOAs, the Navy's 2010 marine mammal monitoring report and the Navy's
2010 exercise report are available by writing to P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation, and Education Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, by telephoning the contact listed
here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications. Documents
cited in this notice may be viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS (301) 713-2289 x 137.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) directs
the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the incidental, but
not intentional taking of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in
a military readiness activity if certain findings are made and
regulations are issued.
Authorization may be granted for periods of 5 years or less if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for certain subsistence uses.
In addition, NMFS must prescribe regulations that include permissible
methods of taking and other means effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on the species and its habitat, and on the availability
of the species for subsistence uses, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance. The
regulations also must include requirements pertaining to the monitoring
and reporting of such taking.
Regulations governing the taking of marine mammals incidental to
the U.S. Navy's training activities at the Navy's VACAPES, JAX, and
Cherry Point range complexes were published on June 15, 2009 (VACAPES:
74 FR 28328; JAX: 74 FR 28349; CHPT: 74 FR 28370) and remain in effect
through June 4, 2014. They are codified at 50 CFR part 218 subpart A
(for VACAPES Range Complex), subpart B (for JAX Range Complex), and
subpart C (for Cherry Point Range Complex). These regulations include
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements for the incidental
taking of marine mammals by the Navy's range complex training
exercises. For detailed information on these actions, please refer to
the June 15, 2009 Federal Register Notices and 50 CFR part 218 subparts
A, B, and C. An interim final rule for the modification of certain Navy
training activities at VACAPES and JAX was published on May 26, 2011
(76 FR 30552).
Summary of LOA Request
NMFS received an application from the U.S. Navy for three LOAs
covering the Navy's training activities at the VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT
range complexes off the US East Coast under the regulations issued on
June 15, 2009 (VACAPES: 74 FR 28328; JAX: 74 FR 28349; Cherry Point: 74
FR 28370). The Navy requested several minor modifications to their
training activities within the VACAPES and JAX Range Complexes starting
in 2011 (see detailed description in ``Planned Activities for 2011''
section), and requested that these LOAs become effective on June 5,
2011. In order to allow for the Navy's proposed modification in its
training activities at VACAPES and JAX range complexes, NMFS issued an
interim final rule (76 FR 30552; May 26, 2011) to allow flexibilities
in the Navy's evolving training programs as long as the impacts to the
environment do not exceed the impacts analyzed in the original
regulations for these range complexes. The application requested
authorization, for a period not to exceed one year, to take, by
harassment, marine mammals incidental to proposed training activities
that involve underwater explosives.
Summary of Activity Under the 2010 VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT LOAs
As described in the Navy's exercise reports for VACAPES, JAX, and
CHPT Range Complexes, in 2010, the training activities conducted by the
Navy were within the scope and amounts contemplated by the final rule
and identified by the 2010 LOAs. In fact, the number of training
exercises was below the Navy's proposed 2010 operations, except for
mine exercises (MINEX) at VACAPES Range Complex, which exceeded the
annual planned amount of 24 events by an extra 31 events. However, this
level is still under the total of 120 events authorized under the 5-
year rule, and the take of marine mammals was still below that
authorized in the LOAs. A detailed description of the Navy's 2010
training activities can be found in the exercise reports posted on NMFS
Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Planned Activities for 2011
In 2011, the Navy plans to make some minor modifications to its
training activities at the VACAPES and JAX range complexes, while
maintaining the same type and amount of training activities at the CHPT
Range Complex, as compared to the final rules and the 2010 LOAs. A
detailed description of these proposed modifications is provided below.
Modification for Training at VACAPES Range Complex
Within the VACAPES Range Complex, the Navy estimates an increase in
the number of MINEX training events. In June 2009, NMFS specified 20 lb
NEW charges for VACAPES Range Complex based on the Navy's preliminary
estimate of 24 events at the time of the original Request for Letter of
Authorization. To accommodate emergent MINEX training requirements, the
Navy requested a revised authorization of 9 5-lb NEW charges, 150 10-lb
NEW charges, and 160 20-lb NEW charges per year, as listed in Table 1.
No change is requested for MINEX using the Airborne Mine Neutralization
System (AMNS).
Training using 5-, 10-, and 20-lb NEW charges during MINEX would
occur at the same locations in VACAPES where previous 20-lb NEW charges
would typically occur. These locations are the same MINEX training
areas described under NMFS June 15, 2009, final rule (VACAPES: 74 FR
28328).
In addition, the Navy estimates an increase in the number of
bombing exercise (BOMBEX) training events. However, instead of training
with the MK-83 (1,000 lb) bombs, training will use the MK-82 (500 lb)
bombs. In June 2009, NMFS authorized 20 MK-83 bombs per year for
VACAPES Range Complex based on the Navy's preliminary estimate at the
time of the original Request for Letter of Authorization. To
accommodate an increased need for BOMBEX training based on changes to
training requirements, the Navy requests that MK-82 bombs be added to
the list of ordnance for BOMBEX. For 2011-2013,
[[Page 33268]]
the Navy anticipates 40 MK-82 (500 lb) bombs and no MK-83 (1,000 lb)
bombs will be used per year, as listed in Table 1. Although the number
of bombs requested is increasing, the type of bomb (MK-82) is smaller
(500 lb) and has fewer explosives, and therefore the potential
exposures are reduced.
Training using MK-82 bombs during BOMBEX would occur at the same
location in VACAPES Range Complex where MK-83 bomb use would typically
occur. This location is the same BOMBEX training area described under
NMFS June 15, 2009, final rule (VACAPES: 74 FR 28328).
Modification for Training at JAX Range Complex
With in the JAX Range Complex, the Navy estimates a reduction in
the number of MINEX 20-lb NEW charge training events. In June 2009,
NMFS authorized 12 events using 20-lb NEW charges per year for JAX
Range Complex based on the Navy's preliminary estimate at the time of
the original Request for Letter of Authorization. Given new information
on planned Fleet MINEX training that was not previously available, the
Navy requested a revised authorization for 10 MINEX events per year as
listed in Table 1.
Table 1--Comparison of Changes for Annual Training Activities Starting From 2011 at the VACAPES and JAX Range
Complexes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VACAPES Range Complex
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINEX (5-lb NEW charges)........ 0 0 9 9 9
MINEX (10-lb NEW charges)....... 0 0 150 150 150
MINEX (20-lb NEW charges)....... 24 24 160 160 160
BOMBEX (MK-82 bombs)............ 0 0 40 40 40
BOMBEX (MK-83 bombs)............ 20 20 0 0 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JAX Range Complex
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINEX (20-lb NEW charges)....... 12 12 12 10 10
MISSILEX (Maverick missiles).... 3 3 10 10 10
FIREX with IMPASS (BB & CC box). 10 10 5 5 5
FIREX with IMPASS (JAX Deepwater 0 0 5 5 5
Site)..........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Navy estimates an increase in the number of
Maverick missile exercise (MISSILEX) training events. In June 2009,
NMFS authorized 3 events using Maverick missiles per year for training
at the JAX Range Complex based on the Navy's preliminary estimate at
the time of original Request for Letter of Authorizations submission.
To accommodate an increased need for Maverick MISSILEX training based
on changes to training requirements, the Navy requested a revised
authorization of 10 events using Maverick missiles per year as listed
in Table 1.
Finally, the Navy requires an additional training location for
firing exercise (FIREX) with Integrated Maritime Portable Acoustic
Scoring and Simulation System (IMPASS) training events. In June 2009,
NMFS authorized 10 FIREX with IMPASS events per year for JAX Range
Complex within the BB and CC boxes based on the preliminary estimate
available at the time of the original Request for Letter of
Authorization. Given new information on planned Fleet FIREX with IMPASS
training that was not previously available, the Navy requested a
revised annual authorization for FIREX with IMPASS events to also occur
in the new proposed FIREX with IMPASS training location, the JAX
Deepwater IMPASS Site further offshore. The Navy also requested a
reduction in the number of events occurring at the BB and CC sites. The
total number of events from training at both locations remains the same
(10 events).
No modification is proposed by the Navy for its planned 2011
activities at the CHPT Range Complex.
In addition, due to a recent underwater detonation (UNDET) training
event during which common dolphins were killed, the Navy is suspending
all underwater explosive detonations using time-delay devices during
training. While this suspension is in place, the Navy will continue to
conduct UNDETs under positive control, when detonation can be suspended
if a marine mammal enters a pre-established safety zone. For these
events, the Navy shall continue to follow all UNDET training mitigation
measures as outlined in the final rule and the LOA.
Estimated Take for 2011
The estimated takes for the Navy's proposed 2011 training exercises
are the same as those authorized in 2010. No change has been made in
the estimated takes from the 2009 LOAs.
Although the Navy has made several changes to its training
activities within the VACAPES and JAX range complexes, the calculation
of exposures for these changes were completed by the Navy using the
same model, criteria, and location originally used to calculate
exposures from these activities when the Navy applied for the LOAs. The
methodology is described on pages 6--21 of the original VACAPES LOA
application (DoN 2008a) and pages 6--17 of the original JAX LOA
application (DoN 2008b), respectively.
For the MINEX activities within the VACAPES Range Complex, the
change from 24 20-lb NEW charges to 9 5-lb NEW charges, 150 10-lb NEW
charges, and 160 20-lb NEW charges would result in an additional 7
Level B exposures and 1 Level A exposure.
For the BOMBEX activities within the VACAPES Range Complex, the
change from 20 MK-83 (1,000 lb) bombs to 40 MK-82 (500 lb) bombs would
result in a reduction of 313 Level B exposures and 4 Level A exposures.
A detailed description of these changes by species in Level A and
Level B exposure at the VACAPES Range Complex is shown in Table 2.
While the annual exposures anticipated from the requested changes are
less than the amount of take originally authorized as a result of the
conservative analyses, the amount of annual take requested remains the
same as in the original authorization.
[[Page 33269]]
Table 2--Changes of modeled exposures by species at the VACAPES Range Complex
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Revised
Species modeled modeled Change Level
exposure exposure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINEX:
Bottlenose Dolphin.......................... 0 2 +2 B
Clymene dolphin............................. 0 2 +2 B
Pantropical spotted dolphin................. 1 4 +3 B
Pantropical spotted dolphin................. 0 1 +1 A
BOMBEX:
Atlantic spotted dolphin.................... 9 7 -2 B
Bottlenose dolphin.......................... 17 15 -2 B
Clymene dolphin............................. 31 26 -5 B
Common dolphin.............................. 2,059 1,766 -293 B
Pantropical spotted dolphin................. 64 55 -9 B
Risso's dolphin............................. 11 9 -2 B
Common dolphin.............................. 17 15 -2 A
Pantropical spotted dolphin................. 1 0 -1 A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the MINEX activities within the JAX Range Complex, the change
from 12 20-lb NEW charges to 10 20-lb NEW charges would result in no
change in exposure numbers.
For the MISSILEX activities within the JAX Range Complex, the
change from 3 Maverick missiles to 10 Maverick missiles would result in
an additional 4 Level B exposures.
For the FIREX with IMPASS activities within the JAX Range Complex,
the change from 10 events in BB and CC boxes to 5 events in BB and CC
boxes and 5 events in the new JAX Deepwater IMPASS Site would result in
a reduction of 15 Level B exposures and 1 Level A exposure. This
reduction of exposures is mainly due to the lower marine mammal density
at the JAX Deepwater IMPASS Site.
A detailed description of these changes by species in Level A and
Level B exposure at the JAX Range Complex is shown in Table 3. While
the annual exposures anticipated from the requested changes are less
than the amount of take originally authorized as a result of the
conservative analyses, the amount of annual take requested remains the
same as in the original authorization.
Table 3--Changes of modeled exposures by species at the JAX Range Complex
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Revised
Species modeled modeled Change Level
exposure exposure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MISSILEX:
Atlantic spotted dolphin........................ 1 5 +4 B
FIREX with IMPASS:
Atlantic spotted dolphin........................ 23 12 -11 B
Bottlenose Dolphin.............................. 10 6 -4 B
Clymene dolphin................................. 1 0 -1 B
Pantropical spotted dolphin..................... 1 2 +1 B
Pilot whale..................................... 1 2 +1 B
Risso's dolphin................................. 3 2 -1 B
Atlantic spotted dolphin........................ 1 0 -1 A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Monitoring, Reporting, and Other Requirements Under the 2010
LOA
Annual Exercise Reports
The Navy submitted their 2010 exercise report within the required
timeframes and it is posted on NMFS Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. NMFS has reviewed the report and it contains
the information required by the 2010 LOAs. The report lists the amount
of training exercises conducted between June 2010 and January 2011. For
training exercises conducted at the VACAPES Range Complex, the Navy
conducted 77 exercises out of the total of 176 proposed. For training
exercises at the JAX Range Complex, the Navy conducted 14 out of 175
exercises proposed. No training exercise was conducted at the Cherry
Point Range Complex, though a total of 38 exercises were proposed.
Monitoring and Annual Monitoring Reports
The Navy conducted the monitoring required by the 2010 LOA and
described in the Monitoring Plan, which included aerial and vessel
surveys of training exercises by marine mammal observers. The Navy
submitted their 2010 Monitoring Report, which is posted on NMFS' Web
site (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm), within the
required timeframe. The Navy included a summary of their 2010
monitoring effort and results (beginning on page 3 of the monitoring
report).
Based on the Navy's monitoring report, approximately 107 cetaceans
were sighted from 7 sightings during the MINEX vessel visual survey and
FIREX visual survey on August 9 and 10, 2010, respectively. These
cetaceans include 65 common dolphins, 12 bottlenose dolphins, 6 Risso's
dolphins, 10 Atlantic spotted dolphins, and 14 unidentified cetacean
species. None of these animals were expected to be affected because
they were all outside the take zones.
In addition, approximately 172 cetaceans were sighted from 11
sightings during the MISSILEX (Maverick) aerial visual survey on August
9, 2010, and during the FIREX aerial visual surveys on October 5 and 6,
2010. These cetaceans include approximately 100 Atlantic spotted
[[Page 33270]]
dolphins, 51 bottlenose dolphins, and 21 unidentified cetacean species.
Most of the cetaceans were sighted either outside the take zone or
before the Navy exercise, and were not expected to be affected. Only
one bottlenose dolphin was sighted approximately 68 yards from the
vessel during a break between the 1st and 2nd round of FIREX event. No
unusual behavior was observed from the bottlenose dolphin, and the area
was monitored for 30 minutes after the sighting, without the animal
being sighted again, before training activities were resumed.
Integrated Comprehensive Management Program (ICMP) Plan
The ICMP will be used both as: (1) A planning tool to focus Navy
monitoring priorities (pursuant to ESA/MMPA requirements) across Navy
Range Complexes and Exercises; and (2) an adaptive management tool,
through the consolidation and analysis of the Navy's monitoring and
marine observer data, as well as new information from other Navy
programs (e.g., research and development), and other appropriate newly
published information. The Navy updated its 2010 ICMP Plan and will
comply with the Plan. The ICMP may be viewed at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm.
NOAA Workshops
In a January 19, 2010, letter to the Council on Environmental
Quality, NOAA identified the need for two interrelated workshops on
marine mammals and sound in the ocean. To address this commitment, NOAA
is convening two parallel, focused, relatively small, and product-
driven working groups. One will identify and map cetacean ``hot
spots'', defined as areas of known, or reasonably predictable,
biological importance (i.e., for reproduction, feeding, migration) and/
or high densities. The second working group will be directed toward
developing a comprehensive data collection and analysis plan for
describing and predicting underwater sound fields in different areas.
The outcomes of these working groups will be integrated and analyzed in
a broader follow-on symposium to include a larger audience of
scientists, industries, federal agencies, conservation managers, and
environmental NGOs. The final products and analyses will provide a more
robust, comprehensive, and context-specific biological and acoustic
basis by which to inform subsequent management decisions regarding
human noise in our oceans. The steering committee has been convened and
met for the first time in October 2010. Both working groups had their
first meeting in March 2011 in Boston, MA. The working group efforts
should take about a year to complete, and we expect the final symposium
to be held in early 2012. The results of these working groups will be
analyzed by NMFS in an adaptive management context, as related to the
three east coast training ranges final rules, and mitigation or
monitoring measures may be modified, as appropriate.
Adaptive Management
NMFS and the Navy conducted an adaptive management meeting in
October 2010 wherein we reviewed the Navy monitoring results through
August 1, 2010, discussed other Navy research and development efforts,
and discussed other new information that could potentially inform
decisions regarding Navy mitigation and monitoring. Based on the
review, NMFS determines that the Navy's current monitoring plans for
the VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT range complexes are robust and no changes
are warranted.
In terms of the Navy's proposed modification for its future
training activities, NMFS conducted a thorough analysis and issued an
interim final rule to allow flexibility in the Navy's training program,
as long as the effects on marine mammal species and their habitat are
within the scope of NMFS' analysis conducted in 2009 for the initial
final rules governing authorization of these actions (see Planned
Activities for 2011 section above).
Authorization
The Navy complied with the requirements of the 2010 LOAs. Based on
our review of the record, NMFS has determined that the marine mammal
take resulting from the 2010 military readiness training and research
activities falls within the levels previously anticipated, analyzed,
and authorized, and was likely lower given the fact that Navy conducted
fewer operations in 2010 than originally planned. Further, the level of
taking authorized in 2011 for the Navy's training exercises at VACAPES,
JAX, and CHPT range complexes is consistent with our previous findings
made for the total taking allowed under these range complexes
regulations. Finally, the record supports NMFS' conclusion that the
total number of marine mammals taken by the 2011 training exercises at
VACAPES, JAX, and CHPT range complexes will have no more than a
negligible impact on the affected species or stock of marine mammals
and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of
these species or stocks for taking for subsistence uses. Accordingly,
NMFS has issued three one-year LOAs for Navy training exercises
conducted at these East Coast range complexes from June 5, 2011,
through June 4, 2012.
Dated: June 1, 2011.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-14148 Filed 6-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P