National Forest System Invasive Species Management Policy, 32135-32141 [2011-13800]
Download as PDF
32135
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 107
Friday, June 3, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
RIN 0596–AC77
National Forest System Invasive
Species Management Policy
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of proposed directive;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service is seeking
comment on it’s proposal to establish an
internal directive to Forest Service
Manual (FSM) 2900 for invasive species
management. The proposed invasive
species management directive will
provide foundational comprehensive
guidance for the management of
invasive species on aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System (NFS). The directive articulates
broad objectives, policies,
responsibilities, and definitions for
Forest Service employees and partners
to more effectively communicate NFS
invasive species management
requirements at the local, regional, and
national levels. The directive primarily
serves to clarify and improve the
understanding, scope, roles, principles,
and responsibilities associated with
NFS invasive species management for
Forest Service employees and the
public. This directive will increase
Forest Service effectiveness when
planning and implementing invasive
species management activities; using a
collaborative and holistic approach for
protecting and restoring aquatic and
terrestrial ecosystems from the impacts
of invasive plants, pathogens,
vertebrates, and invertebrates.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by August 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments through
the World Wide Web/Internet Web site
https://www.regulations.gov or mail
written comments to Director,
Rangeland Management, Mailstop 1103,
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
Forest Service, USDA, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20250–1103. All comments,
including names and addresses when
provided, are placed in the record and
are available for public inspection and
copying. Persons wishing to inspect the
comments are encouraged to call ahead
(202) 205–1049 to facilitate entrance
into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Ielmini, National Invasive Species
Program Coordinator, National Forest
System, USDA Forest Service, Mailstop
1103, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, (202) 205–1049.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest
Service is amending its directives by
establishing a new title in the Forest
Service Manual, FSM 2900—Invasive
Species Management.
Background and Need for the Proposed
Directive
Background for the Proposed Directive
The management of aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species across the
landscape is widely recognized, and the
Forest Service has conducted invasive
species management activities across
many programs for decades. However,
during the development of the Forest
Service National Strategy and
Implementation Plan for Invasive
Species Management (2004), it was
identified that the National Forest
System lacked a comprehensive policy
(Forest Service directive) to provide
specific direction to the field on the
management of a full suite of aquatic
and terrestrial invasive species. The
need for a consolidated stand-alone
directive for NFS invasive species
management operations was further
identified as a limiting factor during the
program performance review, as well as
during an ongoing program audit by the
USDA Office of Inspector General.
These assessments highlighted that the
invasive species issue was not well
understood in some agency programs,
and based on information gathered on
NFS program activities and annual
program performance there was a need
to better describe the roles and
responsibilities for various levels of
agency staff and leadership to more
effectively address invasive species
threats impacting the National Forest
System.
In addition to establishing this broad
policy, the Agency is developing
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specific operational requirements,
standards, criteria, and guidance for
invasive species management operations
through an accompanying handbook
that will be issued through the
Directives system. The process to
develop this draft handbook has begun
and public comment will be sought in
the near future.
Need for the Proposed Directive
The proposed invasive species
management directive will provide
foundational, comprehensive guidance
for the management of invasive species
on aquatic and terrestrial areas of the
National Forest System. The directive
articulates objectives, policies,
principles, and definitions for Forest
Service employees and partners to more
effectively communicate NFS invasive
species management requirements at the
local, regional, and national levels. The
directive primarily serves to clarify and
improve the understanding, scope,
roles, principles, and responsibilities
associated with NFS invasive species
management for Forest Service
employees and the public. The directive
will increase Forest Service
effectiveness when planning and
implementing invasive species
management activities; using a
collaborative and holistic approach for
protecting and restoring aquatic and
terrestrial ecosystems from the impacts
of invasive plants, pathogens,
vertebrates, and invertebrates.
The proposed directive applies to all
of the National Forest System’s resource
management programs. For example, it
recognizes the need to integrate invasive
species prevention, early detection and
rapid response, control, restoration,
cooperation, education and awareness,
and mitigation activities across NFS
resource management programs, Forest
land use planning activities, projectlevel planning activities, and other NFS
operations. By improving the overall
NFS effectiveness against aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species, the
proposed directive will help the Forest
Service to better manage healthy,
resilient landscapes which will have
greater capacity to survive natural
disturbances and large scale threats to
sustainability, especially under
changing and uncertain future
environmental conditions such as those
driven by climate change and increasing
human uses; a benefit for all
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
32136
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
communities. Through the roles and
responsibilities identified in the
proposed directive, the Forest Service
will be able to more effectively address
invasive species in the conext of
environmental issues such as adaptation
to climate change, increasing wildfire
risk, watershed restoration,
fragmentation of habitats, loss of
biodiversity, and human health
concerns while engaging the public,
including participation by underserved
communities in these programs and
benefits. The proposed directive
strengthens the Agency’s ability to
communicate (outreach) invasive
species management needs at the local,
regional, and national levels by
articulating objectives, policies,
principles, and definitions of invasive
species management for Agency
employees and diverse partners. The
proposed directive fosters a better
understanding and collaboration among
diverse interests among the local to
national levels in order to: (a) Develop
integrated pest management strategies,
goals, objectives, and projects; (b)
reduce the threat invasive species pose
to local economies; and (c) increase
support for and accomplishment of
priority invasive species management
projects threatening aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System and neighboring lands. This will
increase the Agency’s effectiveness
when planning and implementing
invasive species management activities
as a tool for achieving sustainable
management and providing a broad
range of ecosystem services from NFS
lands benefiting all communities.
Implementation of the directive is
projected to increase the amount of
invasive species work planned and
accomplished, increasing economic
development opportunities and
improving local economic stability,
including job and contracting
opportunities among small business
entities, low-income and socially
disadvantaged groups and communities.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments Being Sought
The Agency is specifically seeking
comment on the following objectives or
goals, policy or broad governing
principles, and definitions.
Proposed Objectives or Goals.
Management activities for aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species (including
vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and
pathogens) will be based upon an
integrated pest management approach
on all areas within the National Forest
System, and on areas managed outside
of the National Forest System under the
authority of the Wyden Amendment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
(Pub. L. 109–54, Section 434),
prioritizing prevention and early
detection and rapid response actions as
necessary. All National Forest System
invasive species management activities
will be conducted within the following
strategic objectives:
1. Prevention. Take proactive
approaches to manage all aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System in a manner to protect native
species and ecosystems from the
introduction, establishment, and spread
of invasive species. Prevention can also
include actions to design public-use
facilities to reduce accidental spread of
invasive species, and actions to educate
and raise awareness with internal and
external audiences about the invasive
species threat and respective
management solutions.
2. Early Detection and Rapid
Response (EDRR). Inventory and survey
susceptible aquatic and terrestrial areas
of the National Forest System so as to
quickly detect invasive species
infestations, and subsequently
implement immediate and specific
actions to eradicate those infestations
before they become established and/or
spread. Coordinate detection and
response activities with internal and
external partners to achieve an effective
EDRR approach across all aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System. EDRR actions are grouped into
three main categories: early detection,
rapid assessment, and rapid response.
EDRR systems will be consistent with
guidance from the National Invasive
Species Council, such as the ‘Guidelines
for Early Detection and Rapid
Response’.
3. Control and Management. Conduct
integrated invasive species management
activities on priority aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System will be consistent with guidance
from the National Invasive Species
Council, such as the ‘Control and
Management Guidelines’, to contain,
reduce, and remove established
infestations of aquatic and terrestrial
invasive species, and to limit the
adverse effects of those infestations on
native species, human health, and other
National Forest System resources.
4. Restoration. Pro-actively manage
aquatic and terrestrial areas of the
National Forest System to increase the
ability of those areas to be selfsustaining and resistant (resilience) to
the establishment of invasive species.
Where necessary, implement
restoration, rehabilitation, and/or
revegetation activities following
invasive species treatments to prevent
or reduce the likelihood of the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reoccurrence or spread of aquatic or
terrestrial invasive species.
5. Organizational Collaboration.
Cooperate with other federal agencies,
state agencies, local governments, tribes,
academic institutions, and the private
sector to increase public awareness of
the invasive species threat, and promote
a better understanding of integrated
activities necessary to effectively
manage aquatic and terrestrial invasive
species throughout the National Forest
System. Coordinate National Forest
System invasive species management
activities with other Forest Service
programs and external partners to
reduce, minimize, or eliminate the
potential for introduction,
establishment, spread, and impact of
aquatic and terrestrial invasive species.
Coordinate and integrate invasive
species research and technical
assistance activities conducted by Forest
Service Research and Development, and
State and Private Forestry programs
with National Forest System programs
to increase the management
effectiveness against aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species infestations
impacting or threatening the National
Forest System.
Proposed Policy or Principles
The management of aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species (including
vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and
pathogens) will be based on an
integrated pest management approach,
throughout the National Forest System.
1. Initiate, coordinate, and sustain
actions to prevent, control, and
eliminate priority infestations of
invasive species in aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System using an integrated pest
management approach, and collaborate
with stakeholders to implement
cooperative invasive species
management activities in accordance
with law and policy.
2. When applicable, invasive species
management actions and standards
should be incorporated into resource
management plans at the forest level,
and in programmatic environmental
planning and assessment documents at
the regional or national levels.
3. Determine the vectors,
environmental factors, and pathways
that favor the establishment and spread
of invasive species in aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System, and design management
practices to reduce or mitigate the risk
for introduction or spread of invasive
species in those areas.
4. Determine the risk of introducing,
establishing or spreading invasive
species associated with any proposed
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
action, as an integral component of
project planning and analysis, and
where necessary provide for alternatives
or mitigation measures to reduce or
eliminate that risk prior to project
approval.
5. Ensure that all Forest Service
management activities are designed to
minimize or eliminate the possibility of
establishment or spread of invasive
species on the National Forest System,
or to adjacent areas. Integrate visitor use
strategies with invasive species
management activities on aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System. At no time are invasive species
to be promoted or used in site
restoration or re-vegetation work,
watershed rehabilitation projects,
planted for bio-fuels production, or
other management activities on national
forests and grasslands.
6. Use contract and permit clauses to
require that the activities of contractors
and permittees are conducted to prevent
and control the introduction,
establishment, and spread of aquatic
and terrestrial invasive species. For
example, where determined to be
appropriate use agreement clauses to
require contractors or permittees to meet
Forest Service-approved vehicle and
equipment cleaning requirements/
standards prior to using the vehicle or
equipment in the National Forest
System.
7. Make every effort to prevent the
accidental spread of invasive species
carried by contaminated vehicles,
equipment, personnel, or materials
(including plants, wood, plant/wood
products, water, soil, rock, sand, gravel,
mulch, seeds, grain, hay, straw, or other
materials).
a. Establish and implement standards
and requirements for vehicle and
equipment cleaning to prevent the
accidental spread of aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species on the
National Forest System or to adjacent
areas.
b. Make every effort to ensure that all
materials used on the National Forest
System are free of invasive species and/
or noxious weeds (including free of
reproductive/propagative material such
as seeds, roots, stems, flowers, leaves,
larva, eggs, veligers, and so forth).
8. Where States have legislative
authority to certify materials as weedfree (or invasive-free) and have an active
State program to make those Statecertified materials available to the
public, forest officers shall develop
rules restricting the possession, use, and
transport of those materials unless proof
exists that they have been State-certified
as weed-free (or invasive-free), as
provided in 36 CFR part 261.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
9. Monitor all management activities
for potential spread or establishment of
invasive species in aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System.
10. Manage invasive species in
aquatic and terrestrial areas on the
National Forest System using an
integrated pest management approach to
achieve the goals and objectives
identified in Forest Land and Resource
Management plans, and other Forest
Service planning documents, and other
plans developed in cooperation with
external partners for the management of
natural or cultural resources.
11. Integrate invasive species
management funding broadly across a
variety of National Forest System
programs, while associating the funding
with the specific aquatic or terrestrial
invasive species that is being prioritized
for management, as well as the purpose
and need of the project or program
objective.
12. Develop and utilize site-based and
species-based risk assessments to
prioritize the management of invasive
species infestations in aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System. Where appropriate, use a
structured decision-making process and
adaptive management or similar
strategies to help identify and prioritize
invasive species management
approaches and actions.
13. Comply with the Forest Service
performance accountability system
requirements for invasive species
management to ensure efficient use of
limited resources at all levels of the
Agency and to provide information for
adapting management actions to meet
changing program needs and priorities.
When appropriate, utilize a structured
decision-making process to address
invasive species management problems
in changing conditions, uncertainty, or
when information is limited.
14. Establish and maintain a national
record keeping database system for the
collection and reporting of information
related to invasive species infestations
and management activities, including
invasive species management
performance, associated with the
National Forest System. Require all
information associated with National
Forest System invasive species
management (including inventories,
surveys, and treatments) to be collected,
recorded, and reported consistent with
national program protocols, rules, and
standards.
15. Where appropriate, integrate
invasive species management activities,
such as inventory, survey, treatment,
prevention, monitoring, and so forth,
into National Forest System
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32137
management programs. Use inventory
and treatment information to help set
priorities and select integrated
management actions to address new or
expanding invasive species infestations
in aquatic and terrestrial areas of the
National Forest System.
16. Assist and promote cooperative
efforts with internal and external
partners, including private, State, tribal,
and local entities, research
organizations, and international groups
to collaboratively address priority
invasive species issues affecting the
National Forest System.
17. Coordinate as needed with Forest
Service Research and Development and
State and Private Forestry programs,
other agencies included under the
National Invasive Species Council, and
external partners to identify priority/
high-risk invasive species that threaten
aquatic and terrestrial areas of the
National Forest System. Encourage
applied research to develop techniques
and technology to reduce invasive
species impacts to the National Forest
System.
18. As appropriate, collaborate and
coordinate with adjacent landowners
and other stakeholders to improve
invasive species management
effectiveness across the landscape.
Encourage cooperative partnerships to
address invasive species threats within
a broad geographical area.
Proposed Definitions
Adaptive Management. A system of
management practices based on clearly
identified intended outcomes and
monitoring to determine if management
actions are meeting those outcomes;
and, if not, to facilitate management
changes that will best ensure that those
outcomes are met or reevaluated.
Adaptive management stems from the
recognition that knowledge about
natural resource systems is sometimes
uncertain.
Control. With respect to invasive
species (plant, pathogen, vertebrate, or
invertebrate species), control is defined
as any activity or action taken to reduce
the population, contain, limit the
spread, or reduce the effects of an
invasive species. Control activities are
generally directed at established freeliving infestations, and may not
necessarily be intended to eradicate the
targeted infestation in all cases.
Early Detection. The process of
finding, identifying, and quantifying
new, small, or previously unknown
infestations of aquatic or terrestrial
invasive species prior to (or in the
initial stages of) its establishment as
free-living expanding population. Early
detection of an invasive species is
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
32138
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
typically coupled with integrated
activities to rapidly assess and respond
with quick and immediate actions to
eradicate, control, or contain it.
Eradication. With respect to invasive
species (plant, pathogen, vertebrate, or
invertebrate species), eradication is
defined as the removal or elimination of
the last remaining individual invasive
species in the target infestation on a
given site. It is determined to be
complete when the target species is
absent from the site for a continuous
time period (that is, several years after
the last individual was observed).
Eradication of an infestation of invasive
species is relative to the time-frame
provided for the treatment procedures.
Considering the need for multiple
treatments over time, certain
populations can be eradicated using
proper integrated management
techniques.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM). A
pest (in this context an invasive species)
control strategy based on the
determination of an economic, human
health, or environmental threshold that
indicates when a pest population is
approaching the level at which control
measures are necessary to prevent a
decline in the desired conditions
(economic or environmental factors). In
principle, IPM is an ecologically-based
holistic strategy that relies on natural
mortality factors, such as natural
enemies, weather, and environmental
management, and seeks control tactics
that disrupt these factors as little as
possible. Integrated pest management
techniques are defined within four
broad categories: (1) Biological, (2)
Cultural, (3) Mechanical/Physical, and
(4) Chemical techniques.
Invasive Species. Executive Order
13112 defines an invasive species as ‘‘an
alien species whose introduction does
or is likely to cause economic or
environmental harm or harm to human
health.’’ The Forest Service relies on
Executive Order 13112 to provide the
basis for labeling certain organisms as
invasive. Based on this definition, the
labeling of a species as ‘invasive’
requires closely examining both the
origin and effects of the species. The key
is that the species must cause harm and
be exotic to the ecosystem it has
infested before we can consider labeling
it as ‘‘invasive’’. Thus, native pests are
not considered ‘invasive’’, even though
they may cause harm. Invasive species
infest both aquatic and terrestrial areas
and can be identified within any of the
following four taxonomic categories:
Plants, Vertebrates, Invertebrates, and
Pathogens. Additional information on
this definition can be found in
Executive Order 13112.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
Invasive Species Management.
Activities to prevent, control, contain,
eradicate, survey, detect, identify,
inventory, and monitor invasive species;
includes rehabilitation and restoration
of affected sites and educational
activities related to invasive species.
Management actions are based upon
species-specific or site-specific plans
(including forest plans, IPM plans,
watershed restoration plans, and so
forth), and support the accomplishment
of plan goals and objectives and achieve
successful restoration or protection of
priority areas identified in the
respective plan(s).
Inventory. Invasive species
inventories are generally defined as the
observance and collection of
information related to the occurrence,
population or infestation of the detected
species across the landscape or with
respect to a more narrowly-defined area
or site. Inventory attributes and
purposes will vary, but are typically
designed to meet specific management
objectives which need information
about the extent of an invasive species
infestation. Inventories are typically
conducted to quantify the extent of, and
other attributes related to, infestations
identified during survey activities.
Memorandum of Understanding. A
written agreement between the Forest
Service and local, State, or Federal
entities, or private organizations,
entered into when there is no exchange
of funds from one organization to
another.
Monitoring. For the purposes of
invasive species program performance
and accountability, the term
‘‘monitoring’’ refers to the observance
and recording of information related to
the responses to treating an invasive
species infestation, and reported as
treatment efficacy. By monitoring the
treatment results over time, a measure of
overall programmatic treatment efficacy
can be determined and an adaptive
management process can be used in
subsequent treatment activities.
Noxious Weed. The term ‘‘Noxious
Weed’’ is defined for the Federal
government in the Plant Protection Act
of 2000 and in some individual State
statutes. For purposes of this chapter,
the term has the same meaning as found
in the Plant Protection Act of 2000 as
follows: The term ‘‘noxious weed’’
means any plant or plant product that
can directly or indirectly injure or cause
damage to crops (including nursery
stock or plant products), livestock,
poultry, or other interests of agriculture,
irrigation, navigation, the natural
resources of the United States, the
public health, or the environment. The
term typically describes species of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
plants that have been determined to be
undesirable or injurious in some
capacity. Federal noxious weeds are
regulated by USDA–Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service under the
Plant Protection Act of 2000 which
superseded the Federal Noxious Weed
Act of 1974. State statues for noxious
weeds vary widely, with some states
lacking any laws defining or regulating
noxious weeds. Depending on the
individual State law, some plants listed
by a State statute as ‘‘noxious’’ may be
native plants which that state has
determined to be undesirable. When the
species are native they are not
considered invasive species by the
Federal government. However, in most
cases, State noxious weed lists include
only exotic (non-native) species.
Prevention. Prevention measures for
invasive species management programs
include a wide range of actions and
activities to reduce or eliminate the
chance of an invasive species entering
or becoming established in a particular
area. Preventative activities can include
projects for education and awareness as
well as more traditional prevention
activities such as vehicle/equipment
cleaning, boat inspections, or native
plant restoration plantings. Restoration
activities typically prevent invasive
species infestations by improving site
resilience, and reducing or eliminating
the conditions on a site that may
facilitate or promote invasive species
establishment.
Priority Area Treated. Program or
project plans (primarily at the district or
forest level) will identify priority areas
on which to focus integrated
management actions to directly prevent,
control, or eradicate a priority/high-risk
aquatic or terrestrial invasive species.
Priority areas indentified for invasive
species treatments may include any
specifically-delineated project area.
Examples include, but are not limited
to: a fuels treatment area, a developed
recreation area, a transportation
corridor, a facility, a sensitive habitat for
rare species, a wetland, a river, a lake,
a stream, an irrigation ditch, a grazing
allotment, a stock pond, a fire camp,
wildlife winter range, a burned area, a
fire-break, a timber sale area, a
wilderness area, a Research Natural
Area, an energy transmission right of
way, and so forth). The size of the
priority area treated will typically be
measured in acres. For linear features
(such as a stream/river, trail, roadway,
power-line, ditch, and so forth) the area
size can be calculated from the length
and average width. In some cases, a
smaller portion of a delineated project
area infested by invasive species may be
prioritized for treatment over the larger
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
infestation. Guidance on determining
and establishing priorities for invasive
species management is provided in the
Forest Service Invasive Species
Management Handbook (FSH 2900).
Rapid Response. With respect to
invasive species (plant, pathogen,
vertebrate, or invertebrate species),
rapid responses are defined as the quick
and immediate actions taken to
eradicate, control, or contain
infestations that must be completed
within a relatively short time to
maximize the biological and economic
effectiveness against the targeted
invasive species. Depending on the risk
of the targeted invasive species, rapid
response actions may be supported by
an emergency situation determination
and emergency considerations would
include the geographic extent of the
infestation, distance from other known
infestations, mobility and rate of spread
of the invasive species, threat level and
potential impacts, and available
treatments.
Restored. With respect to performance
specifically, the invasive species
program is driven by an outcome-based
performance measure centered on
‘restoration’. An area treated (see
‘‘treatment’’ definition) against invasive
species has been ‘restored’ when the
targeted invasive species defined in the
project plan was controlled or
eradicated directly as a result of the
treatment activity. In some instances,
actions taken across particular areas to
prevent the establishment and spread of
specific invasive species are also
included in this treatment definition.
‘Restored’ acres are a subset of ‘treated’
acres, which are tracked annually to
determine the effectiveness of
treatments. Preventing, controlling, or
eradicating invasive species assists in
the recovery of the area’s resilience and
the capacity of a system to adapt to
change if the environment where the
system exists has been degraded,
damaged, or destroyed (in this case by
invasive species); and helps to
reestablish ecosystem functions by
modifying or managing composition and
processes necessary to make terrestrial
and aquatic ecosystems sustainable, and
resilient, under current and future
conditions (as described in FSM 2020).
In most cases, this is a performance
measure defined in the project plan, and
project managers have the flexibility to
set the parameters for determining when
the treated areas have been restored.
Absence of an individual invasive
species organism, whether through
eradication or prevention efforts, is most
often the criteria used to determine
when acres have been restored.
Monitoring treatment efficacy is critical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
to reporting invasive species
management performance.
Resilience. The capacity of an
ecosystem to absorb disturbance and
reorganize while undergoing change, so
as to still retain essentially the same
function, structure, identity, and
feedbacks. By working toward the goals
of diverse native ecosystems that are
connected and can absorb disturbance,
it is expected that over time,
management would create ecological
conditions that support the abundance
and distribution of native species within
a geographic area to provide for native
plant and animal diversity.
State Agency. A State Department of
Agriculture, State Department of Natural
Resources, other State agency, or
subdivision thereof, responsible for the
administration or implementation of
State laws pertaining to invasive
species, noxious weeds, exotic species,
or other pest/undesirable species.
Structured Decision Making (SDM). A
general term for carefully-organized
analysis of problems in order to reach
decisions that are focused clearly on
achieving fundamental objectives. Based
in decision theory and risk analysis,
SDM encompasses a simple set of
concepts and helpful steps, rather than
a rigidly-prescribed approach for
problem solving. Key SDM concepts
include making decisions based on
clearly articulated fundamental
objectives, dealing explicitly with
uncertainty, and responding
transparently to legal mandates and
public preferences or values in decision
making; thus, SDM integrates science
and policy explicitly. Every decision
consists of several primary elements,
management objectives, decision
options, and predictions of decision
outcomes. By analyzing each
component separately and thoughtfully
within a comprehensive decision
framework, it is possible to improve the
quality of decision-making. The core
SDM concepts and steps to better
decision making are useful across all
types of decisions: from individuals
making minor decisions to complex
public sector decisions involving
multiple decision makers, scientists and
other stakeholders.
Survey. An invasive species survey is
a process of systematically searching a
geographic area for a particular
(targeted) invasive species, or a group of
invasive species, to determine if the
species exists in that area. It is
important to know where and when
surveys have occurred, even if the object
of the survey (target species) was not
located. Information on the absence of
an invasive species can be as valuable
as information on the presence of the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32139
species, and can be used as a foundation
to an early detection system. Unlike
inventories, surveys typically do not
collect additional detailed attributes of
the infestation or the associated site.
Targeted Invasive Species. An
individual invasive species or
population of invasive species, which
has been prioritized at the project-level
for management action based upon risk
assessments, project objectives,
economic considerations, and other
priority-setting decision support tools.
Treatment. Any activity or action
taken to directly prevent, control, or
eradicate a targeted invasive species.
Treatment of an invasive species
infestation may not necessarily result in
the elimination of the infestation, and
multiple treatments on the same site or
population are sometimes required to
affect a change in the status of the
infestation. Treatment activities
typically fall within any of the four
general categories of integrated
management techniques: Biological
treatments, Cultural treatments,
Mechanical treatments, or Chemical
treatments. For example, the use of
domestic goats to control invasive
plants would be considered a biological
treatment; the use of a piscicide to
control invasive fishes would be
characterized as a chemical treatment;
planting of native seeds used to prevent
invasive species infestations and restore
a degraded site would be considered a
cultural treatment technique;
developing an aquatic species barrier to
prevent invasive species from spreading
throughout a watershed would be
considered a physical treatment;
cleaning, scraping, or otherwise
removing invasive species attached to
equipment, structures, or vehicles
would be considered a mechanical
treatment designed to directly control
and prevent the spread of those species.
Regulatory Certifications
Environmental Impact
The proposed directive establishes
broad, foundational policy for invasive
species management on the National
Forest System and associated resources.
Agency procedure at 36 CFR 220.6(d)(2)
(73 FR 43093) excludes from
documentation in an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement ‘‘rules, regulations, or policies
to establish Service-wide administrative
procedures, program processes, or
instructions.’’ The Agency has
concluded that the proposed directive
falls within this category of actions and
that no extraordinary circumstances
exist which would require preparation
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
32140
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
Federalism
of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Regulatory Impact
This proposed directive has been
reviewed under USDA procedures and
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review. It has been
determined that this is not an
economically significant action. This
action to issue agency policy will not
have an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the economy nor adversely
affect productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or
safety, nor state or local governments.
This action will not interfere with an
action taken or planned by another
agency. This action will not alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients of
such programs. However, because of the
extensive interest in the management of
National Forest System land, this
proposed agency directive has been
designated as significant and, therefore,
is subject to Office of Management and
Budget review under Executive Order
12866.
This proposed directive has been
considered in light of Executive Order
13272 regarding proper consideration of
small entities and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA), which amended the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq). A small enitities flexibility
assessment has determined that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as defined by
SBREFA. This proposed directive is
focused on National Forest System
invasive species management activities,
is not a regulation, and imposes no
requirements on small or large entities.
Addtionally, the proposed directive will
increase agency effectiveness when
planning and implementing invasive
species management activities at the
local level and, in turn, will provide
opportunities to facilitate economic
development for local communities and
provide job opportunities for small
business entities or individuals.
This proposed directive is consistent
with the terminology and requirements
identified in Executive Order 13112 on
invasive species, and correlates the
Forest Service roles and responsibilities
with the goals, objectives, and priority
actions to manage invasive species
identified in the National Invasive
Species Council’s National Invasive
Species Management Plan (2001 and
2008–2012, as amended).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
The Agency has considered this
proposed directive under the
requirements of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism. The Agency has concluded
that the proposed directive conforms
with the federalism principles set out in
this Executive Order; will not impose
any compliance costs on the States; and
will not have substantial direct effects
on the States or the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore,
the Agency has determined that no
further assessment of federalism
implications is necessary.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175 of
November 6, 2000, ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments,’’ the Agency has assessed
the impact of this proposed directive on
Indian Tribes and has determined that
it does not have substantial direct or
unique effects on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. The
proposed directive does not have tribal
implications, affect the rights of Indian
tribes to self-governance, and does not
impact tribal sovereignty or selfdetermination. Specifically, the
proposed directive represents a
compilation and consolidation of
existing invasive species management
authorities, roles, and responsibilities
focused on the duties of Forest Service
personnel on the National Forest
System, and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Therefore, after discussions and
coordination with the Forest Service
Office of Tribal Relations and regional
Forest Service tribal coordinators
regarding this proposed directive, the
Agency has determined that formal
consultation with Tribal governments
on this proposed directive is
unnecessary prior to publishing this
proposed directive in the Federal
Register.
Implementation of this directive
primarily occurs at the local level
(national forest or grassland unit)
through land management planning and
project-level planning and
accomplishment. Therefore,
coordination with Tribes, other
governmental organizations, and the
public is most applicable at the forest
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and grassland level because it is at that
level that specific invasive species
management goals and objectives are
established. Also, at that level the
design and effects of invasive species
management activities are most
effectively managed in relation to the
Agency’s tribal trust responsibilities and
Indian tribal treaty rights.
In addition, during the review and
coordination with the Forest Service
Office of Tribal Relations, it was agreed
that the Agency would coordinate an
outreach effort through the respective
regional OTR directors/staff regarding
the future development of the Forest
Service Handbook for NFS Invasive
Species Management; inviting
additional review and collaboration
with interested Tribal governments
during that process. This future Forest
Service Handbook on Invasive Species
Management would tier directly from
this proposed [final] directive and
would provide the detailed operational
requirements, standards, criteria, and
guidance which would be most
applicable to Tribal government
interests.
No Takings Implications
This proposed directive has been
analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, and it has been determined that
the proposed directive does not pose the
risk of a taking of protected private
property.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed directive has been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988
of February 7, 1996, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform.’’ After adoption of this
proposed directive, (1) All state and
local laws and regulations that conflict
with this proposed directive or that
would impede full implementation of
this directive would be preempted; (2)
no retroactive effect would be given to
this proposed directive; and (3) the
proposed directive would not require
the use of administrative proceedings
before parties could file suit in court
challenging its provisions.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538), which the President signed
into law on March 22, 1995, the Agency
has assessed the effects of this proposed
directive on State, local, and Tribal
governments and the private sector.
This proposed directive does not
compel the expenditure of funds by any
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 / Notices
State, local, or Tribal government or
anyone in the private sector. Therefore,
a statement under section 202 of the Act
is not required.
Energy Effects
This proposed directive has been
reviewed under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. It has been
determined that this proposed directive
does not constitute a significant energy
action as defined in the Executive
Order.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
Public
This proposed directive does not
contain any additional record keeping
or reporting requirements or other
information collection requirements as
defined in 5 CFR part 1320 that are not
already required by law or not already
approved for use, and therefore,
imposes no additional paperwork
burden on the public. Accordingly, the
review provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) and its implementing
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not
apply.
Dated: May 27, 2011.
Mary Wagner,
Associate Chief.
[FR Doc. 2011–13800 Filed 6–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Alaska Pacific Halibut Fisheries:
Charter Recordkeeping.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0575.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Number of Respondents: 1,909.
Average Hours per Response: 4
minutes.
Burden Hours: 2,415.
Needs and Uses: This request is for an
extension of a currently approved
information collection.
Pacific halibut is an unusual resource
in that halibut management in both state
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:49 Jun 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
and federal waters is an international
and federal responsibility under the
North Pacific Halibut Act of 1982.
Annual catch quotas are determined by
the International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC), and federal
responsibility for halibut management
extends to halibut stocks and fishing
activity within State of Alaska waters. In
order to manage halibut effectively,
international and federal managers need
information on halibut fishing effort and
harvest by all user groups, including the
guided sport charter sector of the
fishery.
In order to minimize the
recordkeeping and reporting burden on
guided charter operations, federal and
international managers depend on
fishing activity and harvest information
collected by the State of Alaska through
its charter logbook program. Federal
regulations at 50 CFR 300.65 require
charter vessel operators fishing in IPHC
Areas 2C and 3A to comply with the
State of Alaska logbook reporting
requirements.
The State of Alaska Department of
Fish and Game (ADF&G) Division of
Sport Fish initiated a mandatory
logbook program for charter vessels in
1998 requiring annual registration of
sport fishing guides and businesses and
logbook reporting. The logbook and
registration program was intended to
provide information on actual
participation and harvest by individual
charter vessels and businesses in
various regions of the state.
ADF&G issues charter logbooks to
licensed businesses only and also
provides operators with registration
stickers and statistical area maps. A
schedule of logbook due dates is printed
inside the front cover of each logbook.
NMFS and ADF&G coordinated
closely in the development of this
information collection to use the
existing ADF&G logbook to record
information necessary for the
monitoring and enforcement of the
charter vessel angler daily catch limit of
halibut, so that a separate federal
logbook system would not be necessary.
This approach reduces burden to both
the charter vessel industry, and federal
and state management agencies.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
OMB Desk Officer:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32141
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: May 31, 2011.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–13810 Filed 6–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Application for the
President’s ‘‘E’’ and ‘‘E STAR’’ Awards
for Export Expansion
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Laura Barmby,
Laura.Barmby@trade.gov, phone 202–
482–2675, fax 202–482–6902.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The President’s ‘‘E’’ Award for
Excellence in Exporting is our nation’s
highest award to honor American
exporters. ‘‘E’’ Awards recognize
persons, firms, and organizations
making significant contributions to the
increase of American exports. The
President’s ‘‘E STAR’’ Award recognizes
the sustained superior international
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32135-32141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13800]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2011 /
Notices
[[Page 32135]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
RIN 0596-AC77
National Forest System Invasive Species Management Policy
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of proposed directive; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is seeking comment on it's proposal to
establish an internal directive to Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2900 for
invasive species management. The proposed invasive species management
directive will provide foundational comprehensive guidance for the
management of invasive species on aquatic and terrestrial areas of the
National Forest System (NFS). The directive articulates broad
objectives, policies, responsibilities, and definitions for Forest
Service employees and partners to more effectively communicate NFS
invasive species management requirements at the local, regional, and
national levels. The directive primarily serves to clarify and improve
the understanding, scope, roles, principles, and responsibilities
associated with NFS invasive species management for Forest Service
employees and the public. This directive will increase Forest Service
effectiveness when planning and implementing invasive species
management activities; using a collaborative and holistic approach for
protecting and restoring aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems from the
impacts of invasive plants, pathogens, vertebrates, and invertebrates.
DATES: Comments must be received in writing by August 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments through the World Wide Web/Internet Web site
https://www.regulations.gov or mail written comments to Director,
Rangeland Management, Mailstop 1103, Forest Service, USDA, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-1103. All comments,
including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record
and are available for public inspection and copying. Persons wishing to
inspect the comments are encouraged to call ahead (202) 205-1049 to
facilitate entrance into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Ielmini, National Invasive
Species Program Coordinator, National Forest System, USDA Forest
Service, Mailstop 1103, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20250, (202) 205-1049.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Service is amending its
directives by establishing a new title in the Forest Service Manual,
FSM 2900--Invasive Species Management.
Background and Need for the Proposed Directive
Background for the Proposed Directive
The management of aquatic and terrestrial invasive species across
the landscape is widely recognized, and the Forest Service has
conducted invasive species management activities across many programs
for decades. However, during the development of the Forest Service
National Strategy and Implementation Plan for Invasive Species
Management (2004), it was identified that the National Forest System
lacked a comprehensive policy (Forest Service directive) to provide
specific direction to the field on the management of a full suite of
aquatic and terrestrial invasive species. The need for a consolidated
stand-alone directive for NFS invasive species management operations
was further identified as a limiting factor during the program
performance review, as well as during an ongoing program audit by the
USDA Office of Inspector General. These assessments highlighted that
the invasive species issue was not well understood in some agency
programs, and based on information gathered on NFS program activities
and annual program performance there was a need to better describe the
roles and responsibilities for various levels of agency staff and
leadership to more effectively address invasive species threats
impacting the National Forest System.
In addition to establishing this broad policy, the Agency is
developing specific operational requirements, standards, criteria, and
guidance for invasive species management operations through an
accompanying handbook that will be issued through the Directives
system. The process to develop this draft handbook has begun and public
comment will be sought in the near future.
Need for the Proposed Directive
The proposed invasive species management directive will provide
foundational, comprehensive guidance for the management of invasive
species on aquatic and terrestrial areas of the National Forest System.
The directive articulates objectives, policies, principles, and
definitions for Forest Service employees and partners to more
effectively communicate NFS invasive species management requirements at
the local, regional, and national levels. The directive primarily
serves to clarify and improve the understanding, scope, roles,
principles, and responsibilities associated with NFS invasive species
management for Forest Service employees and the public. The directive
will increase Forest Service effectiveness when planning and
implementing invasive species management activities; using a
collaborative and holistic approach for protecting and restoring
aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems from the impacts of invasive plants,
pathogens, vertebrates, and invertebrates.
The proposed directive applies to all of the National Forest
System's resource management programs. For example, it recognizes the
need to integrate invasive species prevention, early detection and
rapid response, control, restoration, cooperation, education and
awareness, and mitigation activities across NFS resource management
programs, Forest land use planning activities, project-level planning
activities, and other NFS operations. By improving the overall NFS
effectiveness against aquatic and terrestrial invasive species, the
proposed directive will help the Forest Service to better manage
healthy, resilient landscapes which will have greater capacity to
survive natural disturbances and large scale threats to sustainability,
especially under changing and uncertain future environmental conditions
such as those driven by climate change and increasing human uses; a
benefit for all
[[Page 32136]]
communities. Through the roles and responsibilities identified in the
proposed directive, the Forest Service will be able to more effectively
address invasive species in the conext of environmental issues such as
adaptation to climate change, increasing wildfire risk, watershed
restoration, fragmentation of habitats, loss of biodiversity, and human
health concerns while engaging the public, including participation by
underserved communities in these programs and benefits. The proposed
directive strengthens the Agency's ability to communicate (outreach)
invasive species management needs at the local, regional, and national
levels by articulating objectives, policies, principles, and
definitions of invasive species management for Agency employees and
diverse partners. The proposed directive fosters a better understanding
and collaboration among diverse interests among the local to national
levels in order to: (a) Develop integrated pest management strategies,
goals, objectives, and projects; (b) reduce the threat invasive species
pose to local economies; and (c) increase support for and
accomplishment of priority invasive species management projects
threatening aquatic and terrestrial areas of the National Forest System
and neighboring lands. This will increase the Agency's effectiveness
when planning and implementing invasive species management activities
as a tool for achieving sustainable management and providing a broad
range of ecosystem services from NFS lands benefiting all communities.
Implementation of the directive is projected to increase the amount of
invasive species work planned and accomplished, increasing economic
development opportunities and improving local economic stability,
including job and contracting opportunities among small business
entities, low-income and socially disadvantaged groups and communities.
Comments Being Sought
The Agency is specifically seeking comment on the following
objectives or goals, policy or broad governing principles, and
definitions.
Proposed Objectives or Goals.
Management activities for aquatic and terrestrial invasive species
(including vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and pathogens) will be
based upon an integrated pest management approach on all areas within
the National Forest System, and on areas managed outside of the
National Forest System under the authority of the Wyden Amendment (Pub.
L. 109-54, Section 434), prioritizing prevention and early detection
and rapid response actions as necessary. All National Forest System
invasive species management activities will be conducted within the
following strategic objectives:
1. Prevention. Take proactive approaches to manage all aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest System in a manner to protect
native species and ecosystems from the introduction, establishment, and
spread of invasive species. Prevention can also include actions to
design public-use facilities to reduce accidental spread of invasive
species, and actions to educate and raise awareness with internal and
external audiences about the invasive species threat and respective
management solutions.
2. Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR). Inventory and survey
susceptible aquatic and terrestrial areas of the National Forest System
so as to quickly detect invasive species infestations, and subsequently
implement immediate and specific actions to eradicate those
infestations before they become established and/or spread. Coordinate
detection and response activities with internal and external partners
to achieve an effective EDRR approach across all aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest System. EDRR actions are
grouped into three main categories: early detection, rapid assessment,
and rapid response. EDRR systems will be consistent with guidance from
the National Invasive Species Council, such as the `Guidelines for
Early Detection and Rapid Response'.
3. Control and Management. Conduct integrated invasive species
management activities on priority aquatic and terrestrial areas of the
National Forest System will be consistent with guidance from the
National Invasive Species Council, such as the `Control and Management
Guidelines', to contain, reduce, and remove established infestations of
aquatic and terrestrial invasive species, and to limit the adverse
effects of those infestations on native species, human health, and
other National Forest System resources.
4. Restoration. Pro-actively manage aquatic and terrestrial areas
of the National Forest System to increase the ability of those areas to
be self-sustaining and resistant (resilience) to the establishment of
invasive species. Where necessary, implement restoration,
rehabilitation, and/or revegetation activities following invasive
species treatments to prevent or reduce the likelihood of the
reoccurrence or spread of aquatic or terrestrial invasive species.
5. Organizational Collaboration. Cooperate with other federal
agencies, state agencies, local governments, tribes, academic
institutions, and the private sector to increase public awareness of
the invasive species threat, and promote a better understanding of
integrated activities necessary to effectively manage aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species throughout the National Forest System.
Coordinate National Forest System invasive species management
activities with other Forest Service programs and external partners to
reduce, minimize, or eliminate the potential for introduction,
establishment, spread, and impact of aquatic and terrestrial invasive
species. Coordinate and integrate invasive species research and
technical assistance activities conducted by Forest Service Research
and Development, and State and Private Forestry programs with National
Forest System programs to increase the management effectiveness against
aquatic and terrestrial invasive species infestations impacting or
threatening the National Forest System.
Proposed Policy or Principles
The management of aquatic and terrestrial invasive species
(including vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and pathogens) will be
based on an integrated pest management approach, throughout the
National Forest System.
1. Initiate, coordinate, and sustain actions to prevent, control,
and eliminate priority infestations of invasive species in aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest System using an integrated
pest management approach, and collaborate with stakeholders to
implement cooperative invasive species management activities in
accordance with law and policy.
2. When applicable, invasive species management actions and
standards should be incorporated into resource management plans at the
forest level, and in programmatic environmental planning and assessment
documents at the regional or national levels.
3. Determine the vectors, environmental factors, and pathways that
favor the establishment and spread of invasive species in aquatic and
terrestrial areas of the National Forest System, and design management
practices to reduce or mitigate the risk for introduction or spread of
invasive species in those areas.
4. Determine the risk of introducing, establishing or spreading
invasive species associated with any proposed
[[Page 32137]]
action, as an integral component of project planning and analysis, and
where necessary provide for alternatives or mitigation measures to
reduce or eliminate that risk prior to project approval.
5. Ensure that all Forest Service management activities are
designed to minimize or eliminate the possibility of establishment or
spread of invasive species on the National Forest System, or to
adjacent areas. Integrate visitor use strategies with invasive species
management activities on aquatic and terrestrial areas of the National
Forest System. At no time are invasive species to be promoted or used
in site restoration or re-vegetation work, watershed rehabilitation
projects, planted for bio-fuels production, or other management
activities on national forests and grasslands.
6. Use contract and permit clauses to require that the activities
of contractors and permittees are conducted to prevent and control the
introduction, establishment, and spread of aquatic and terrestrial
invasive species. For example, where determined to be appropriate use
agreement clauses to require contractors or permittees to meet Forest
Service-approved vehicle and equipment cleaning requirements/standards
prior to using the vehicle or equipment in the National Forest System.
7. Make every effort to prevent the accidental spread of invasive
species carried by contaminated vehicles, equipment, personnel, or
materials (including plants, wood, plant/wood products, water, soil,
rock, sand, gravel, mulch, seeds, grain, hay, straw, or other
materials).
a. Establish and implement standards and requirements for vehicle
and equipment cleaning to prevent the accidental spread of aquatic and
terrestrial invasive species on the National Forest System or to
adjacent areas.
b. Make every effort to ensure that all materials used on the
National Forest System are free of invasive species and/or noxious
weeds (including free of reproductive/propagative material such as
seeds, roots, stems, flowers, leaves, larva, eggs, veligers, and so
forth).
8. Where States have legislative authority to certify materials as
weed-free (or invasive-free) and have an active State program to make
those State-certified materials available to the public, forest
officers shall develop rules restricting the possession, use, and
transport of those materials unless proof exists that they have been
State-certified as weed-free (or invasive-free), as provided in 36 CFR
part 261.
9. Monitor all management activities for potential spread or
establishment of invasive species in aquatic and terrestrial areas of
the National Forest System.
10. Manage invasive species in aquatic and terrestrial areas on the
National Forest System using an integrated pest management approach to
achieve the goals and objectives identified in Forest Land and Resource
Management plans, and other Forest Service planning documents, and
other plans developed in cooperation with external partners for the
management of natural or cultural resources.
11. Integrate invasive species management funding broadly across a
variety of National Forest System programs, while associating the
funding with the specific aquatic or terrestrial invasive species that
is being prioritized for management, as well as the purpose and need of
the project or program objective.
12. Develop and utilize site-based and species-based risk
assessments to prioritize the management of invasive species
infestations in aquatic and terrestrial areas of the National Forest
System. Where appropriate, use a structured decision-making process and
adaptive management or similar strategies to help identify and
prioritize invasive species management approaches and actions.
13. Comply with the Forest Service performance accountability
system requirements for invasive species management to ensure efficient
use of limited resources at all levels of the Agency and to provide
information for adapting management actions to meet changing program
needs and priorities. When appropriate, utilize a structured decision-
making process to address invasive species management problems in
changing conditions, uncertainty, or when information is limited.
14. Establish and maintain a national record keeping database
system for the collection and reporting of information related to
invasive species infestations and management activities, including
invasive species management performance, associated with the National
Forest System. Require all information associated with National Forest
System invasive species management (including inventories, surveys, and
treatments) to be collected, recorded, and reported consistent with
national program protocols, rules, and standards.
15. Where appropriate, integrate invasive species management
activities, such as inventory, survey, treatment, prevention,
monitoring, and so forth, into National Forest System management
programs. Use inventory and treatment information to help set
priorities and select integrated management actions to address new or
expanding invasive species infestations in aquatic and terrestrial
areas of the National Forest System.
16. Assist and promote cooperative efforts with internal and
external partners, including private, State, tribal, and local
entities, research organizations, and international groups to
collaboratively address priority invasive species issues affecting the
National Forest System.
17. Coordinate as needed with Forest Service Research and
Development and State and Private Forestry programs, other agencies
included under the National Invasive Species Council, and external
partners to identify priority/high-risk invasive species that threaten
aquatic and terrestrial areas of the National Forest System. Encourage
applied research to develop techniques and technology to reduce
invasive species impacts to the National Forest System.
18. As appropriate, collaborate and coordinate with adjacent
landowners and other stakeholders to improve invasive species
management effectiveness across the landscape. Encourage cooperative
partnerships to address invasive species threats within a broad
geographical area.
Proposed Definitions
Adaptive Management. A system of management practices based on
clearly identified intended outcomes and monitoring to determine if
management actions are meeting those outcomes; and, if not, to
facilitate management changes that will best ensure that those outcomes
are met or reevaluated. Adaptive management stems from the recognition
that knowledge about natural resource systems is sometimes uncertain.
Control. With respect to invasive species (plant, pathogen,
vertebrate, or invertebrate species), control is defined as any
activity or action taken to reduce the population, contain, limit the
spread, or reduce the effects of an invasive species. Control
activities are generally directed at established free-living
infestations, and may not necessarily be intended to eradicate the
targeted infestation in all cases.
Early Detection. The process of finding, identifying, and
quantifying new, small, or previously unknown infestations of aquatic
or terrestrial invasive species prior to (or in the initial stages of)
its establishment as free-living expanding population. Early detection
of an invasive species is
[[Page 32138]]
typically coupled with integrated activities to rapidly assess and
respond with quick and immediate actions to eradicate, control, or
contain it.
Eradication. With respect to invasive species (plant, pathogen,
vertebrate, or invertebrate species), eradication is defined as the
removal or elimination of the last remaining individual invasive
species in the target infestation on a given site. It is determined to
be complete when the target species is absent from the site for a
continuous time period (that is, several years after the last
individual was observed). Eradication of an infestation of invasive
species is relative to the time-frame provided for the treatment
procedures. Considering the need for multiple treatments over time,
certain populations can be eradicated using proper integrated
management techniques.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM). A pest (in this context an
invasive species) control strategy based on the determination of an
economic, human health, or environmental threshold that indicates when
a pest population is approaching the level at which control measures
are necessary to prevent a decline in the desired conditions (economic
or environmental factors). In principle, IPM is an ecologically-based
holistic strategy that relies on natural mortality factors, such as
natural enemies, weather, and environmental management, and seeks
control tactics that disrupt these factors as little as possible.
Integrated pest management techniques are defined within four broad
categories: (1) Biological, (2) Cultural, (3) Mechanical/Physical, and
(4) Chemical techniques.
Invasive Species. Executive Order 13112 defines an invasive species
as ``an alien species whose introduction does or is likely to cause
economic or environmental harm or harm to human health.'' The Forest
Service relies on Executive Order 13112 to provide the basis for
labeling certain organisms as invasive. Based on this definition, the
labeling of a species as `invasive' requires closely examining both the
origin and effects of the species. The key is that the species must
cause harm and be exotic to the ecosystem it has infested before we can
consider labeling it as ``invasive''. Thus, native pests are not
considered `invasive'', even though they may cause harm. Invasive
species infest both aquatic and terrestrial areas and can be identified
within any of the following four taxonomic categories: Plants,
Vertebrates, Invertebrates, and Pathogens. Additional information on
this definition can be found in Executive Order 13112.
Invasive Species Management. Activities to prevent, control,
contain, eradicate, survey, detect, identify, inventory, and monitor
invasive species; includes rehabilitation and restoration of affected
sites and educational activities related to invasive species.
Management actions are based upon species-specific or site-specific
plans (including forest plans, IPM plans, watershed restoration plans,
and so forth), and support the accomplishment of plan goals and
objectives and achieve successful restoration or protection of priority
areas identified in the respective plan(s).
Inventory. Invasive species inventories are generally defined as
the observance and collection of information related to the occurrence,
population or infestation of the detected species across the landscape
or with respect to a more narrowly-defined area or site. Inventory
attributes and purposes will vary, but are typically designed to meet
specific management objectives which need information about the extent
of an invasive species infestation. Inventories are typically conducted
to quantify the extent of, and other attributes related to,
infestations identified during survey activities.
Memorandum of Understanding. A written agreement between the Forest
Service and local, State, or Federal entities, or private
organizations, entered into when there is no exchange of funds from one
organization to another.
Monitoring. For the purposes of invasive species program
performance and accountability, the term ``monitoring'' refers to the
observance and recording of information related to the responses to
treating an invasive species infestation, and reported as treatment
efficacy. By monitoring the treatment results over time, a measure of
overall programmatic treatment efficacy can be determined and an
adaptive management process can be used in subsequent treatment
activities.
Noxious Weed. The term ``Noxious Weed'' is defined for the Federal
government in the Plant Protection Act of 2000 and in some individual
State statutes. For purposes of this chapter, the term has the same
meaning as found in the Plant Protection Act of 2000 as follows: The
term ``noxious weed'' means any plant or plant product that can
directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including
nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other
interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources
of the United States, the public health, or the environment. The term
typically describes species of plants that have been determined to be
undesirable or injurious in some capacity. Federal noxious weeds are
regulated by USDA-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service under the
Plant Protection Act of 2000 which superseded the Federal Noxious Weed
Act of 1974. State statues for noxious weeds vary widely, with some
states lacking any laws defining or regulating noxious weeds. Depending
on the individual State law, some plants listed by a State statute as
``noxious'' may be native plants which that state has determined to be
undesirable. When the species are native they are not considered
invasive species by the Federal government. However, in most cases,
State noxious weed lists include only exotic (non-native) species.
Prevention. Prevention measures for invasive species management
programs include a wide range of actions and activities to reduce or
eliminate the chance of an invasive species entering or becoming
established in a particular area. Preventative activities can include
projects for education and awareness as well as more traditional
prevention activities such as vehicle/equipment cleaning, boat
inspections, or native plant restoration plantings. Restoration
activities typically prevent invasive species infestations by improving
site resilience, and reducing or eliminating the conditions on a site
that may facilitate or promote invasive species establishment.
Priority Area Treated. Program or project plans (primarily at the
district or forest level) will identify priority areas on which to
focus integrated management actions to directly prevent, control, or
eradicate a priority/high-risk aquatic or terrestrial invasive species.
Priority areas indentified for invasive species treatments may include
any specifically-delineated project area. Examples include, but are not
limited to: a fuels treatment area, a developed recreation area, a
transportation corridor, a facility, a sensitive habitat for rare
species, a wetland, a river, a lake, a stream, an irrigation ditch, a
grazing allotment, a stock pond, a fire camp, wildlife winter range, a
burned area, a fire-break, a timber sale area, a wilderness area, a
Research Natural Area, an energy transmission right of way, and so
forth). The size of the priority area treated will typically be
measured in acres. For linear features (such as a stream/river, trail,
roadway, power-line, ditch, and so forth) the area size can be
calculated from the length and average width. In some cases, a smaller
portion of a delineated project area infested by invasive species may
be prioritized for treatment over the larger
[[Page 32139]]
infestation. Guidance on determining and establishing priorities for
invasive species management is provided in the Forest Service Invasive
Species Management Handbook (FSH 2900).
Rapid Response. With respect to invasive species (plant, pathogen,
vertebrate, or invertebrate species), rapid responses are defined as
the quick and immediate actions taken to eradicate, control, or contain
infestations that must be completed within a relatively short time to
maximize the biological and economic effectiveness against the targeted
invasive species. Depending on the risk of the targeted invasive
species, rapid response actions may be supported by an emergency
situation determination and emergency considerations would include the
geographic extent of the infestation, distance from other known
infestations, mobility and rate of spread of the invasive species,
threat level and potential impacts, and available treatments.
Restored. With respect to performance specifically, the invasive
species program is driven by an outcome-based performance measure
centered on `restoration'. An area treated (see ``treatment''
definition) against invasive species has been `restored' when the
targeted invasive species defined in the project plan was controlled or
eradicated directly as a result of the treatment activity. In some
instances, actions taken across particular areas to prevent the
establishment and spread of specific invasive species are also included
in this treatment definition. `Restored' acres are a subset of
`treated' acres, which are tracked annually to determine the
effectiveness of treatments. Preventing, controlling, or eradicating
invasive species assists in the recovery of the area's resilience and
the capacity of a system to adapt to change if the environment where
the system exists has been degraded, damaged, or destroyed (in this
case by invasive species); and helps to reestablish ecosystem functions
by modifying or managing composition and processes necessary to make
terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems sustainable, and resilient, under
current and future conditions (as described in FSM 2020). In most
cases, this is a performance measure defined in the project plan, and
project managers have the flexibility to set the parameters for
determining when the treated areas have been restored. Absence of an
individual invasive species organism, whether through eradication or
prevention efforts, is most often the criteria used to determine when
acres have been restored. Monitoring treatment efficacy is critical to
reporting invasive species management performance.
Resilience. The capacity of an ecosystem to absorb disturbance and
reorganize while undergoing change, so as to still retain essentially
the same function, structure, identity, and feedbacks. By working
toward the goals of diverse native ecosystems that are connected and
can absorb disturbance, it is expected that over time, management would
create ecological conditions that support the abundance and
distribution of native species within a geographic area to provide for
native plant and animal diversity.
State Agency. A State Department of Agriculture, State Department
of Natural Resources, other State agency, or subdivision thereof,
responsible for the administration or implementation of State laws
pertaining to invasive species, noxious weeds, exotic species, or other
pest/undesirable species.
Structured Decision Making (SDM). A general term for carefully-
organized analysis of problems in order to reach decisions that are
focused clearly on achieving fundamental objectives. Based in decision
theory and risk analysis, SDM encompasses a simple set of concepts and
helpful steps, rather than a rigidly-prescribed approach for problem
solving. Key SDM concepts include making decisions based on clearly
articulated fundamental objectives, dealing explicitly with
uncertainty, and responding transparently to legal mandates and public
preferences or values in decision making; thus, SDM integrates science
and policy explicitly. Every decision consists of several primary
elements, management objectives, decision options, and predictions of
decision outcomes. By analyzing each component separately and
thoughtfully within a comprehensive decision framework, it is possible
to improve the quality of decision-making. The core SDM concepts and
steps to better decision making are useful across all types of
decisions: from individuals making minor decisions to complex public
sector decisions involving multiple decision makers, scientists and
other stakeholders.
Survey. An invasive species survey is a process of systematically
searching a geographic area for a particular (targeted) invasive
species, or a group of invasive species, to determine if the species
exists in that area. It is important to know where and when surveys
have occurred, even if the object of the survey (target species) was
not located. Information on the absence of an invasive species can be
as valuable as information on the presence of the species, and can be
used as a foundation to an early detection system. Unlike inventories,
surveys typically do not collect additional detailed attributes of the
infestation or the associated site.
Targeted Invasive Species. An individual invasive species or
population of invasive species, which has been prioritized at the
project-level for management action based upon risk assessments,
project objectives, economic considerations, and other priority-setting
decision support tools.
Treatment. Any activity or action taken to directly prevent,
control, or eradicate a targeted invasive species. Treatment of an
invasive species infestation may not necessarily result in the
elimination of the infestation, and multiple treatments on the same
site or population are sometimes required to affect a change in the
status of the infestation. Treatment activities typically fall within
any of the four general categories of integrated management techniques:
Biological treatments, Cultural treatments, Mechanical treatments, or
Chemical treatments. For example, the use of domestic goats to control
invasive plants would be considered a biological treatment; the use of
a piscicide to control invasive fishes would be characterized as a
chemical treatment; planting of native seeds used to prevent invasive
species infestations and restore a degraded site would be considered a
cultural treatment technique; developing an aquatic species barrier to
prevent invasive species from spreading throughout a watershed would be
considered a physical treatment; cleaning, scraping, or otherwise
removing invasive species attached to equipment, structures, or
vehicles would be considered a mechanical treatment designed to
directly control and prevent the spread of those species.
Regulatory Certifications
Environmental Impact
The proposed directive establishes broad, foundational policy for
invasive species management on the National Forest System and
associated resources. Agency procedure at 36 CFR 220.6(d)(2) (73 FR
43093) excludes from documentation in an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement ``rules, regulations, or policies to
establish Service-wide administrative procedures, program processes, or
instructions.'' The Agency has concluded that the proposed directive
falls within this category of actions and that no extraordinary
circumstances exist which would require preparation
[[Page 32140]]
of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.
Regulatory Impact
This proposed directive has been reviewed under USDA procedures and
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. It has been
determined that this is not an economically significant action. This
action to issue agency policy will not have an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy nor adversely affect productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, nor state
or local governments. This action will not interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency. This action will not alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs
or the rights and obligations of recipients of such programs. However,
because of the extensive interest in the management of National Forest
System land, this proposed agency directive has been designated as
significant and, therefore, is subject to Office of Management and
Budget review under Executive Order 12866.
This proposed directive has been considered in light of Executive
Order 13272 regarding proper consideration of small entities and the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
which amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq). A
small enitities flexibility assessment has determined that this action
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities as defined by SBREFA. This proposed directive is focused
on National Forest System invasive species management activities, is
not a regulation, and imposes no requirements on small or large
entities. Addtionally, the proposed directive will increase agency
effectiveness when planning and implementing invasive species
management activities at the local level and, in turn, will provide
opportunities to facilitate economic development for local communities
and provide job opportunities for small business entities or
individuals.
This proposed directive is consistent with the terminology and
requirements identified in Executive Order 13112 on invasive species,
and correlates the Forest Service roles and responsibilities with the
goals, objectives, and priority actions to manage invasive species
identified in the National Invasive Species Council's National Invasive
Species Management Plan (2001 and 2008-2012, as amended).
Federalism
The Agency has considered this proposed directive under the
requirements of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The Agency has
concluded that the proposed directive conforms with the federalism
principles set out in this Executive Order; will not impose any
compliance costs on the States; and will not have substantial direct
effects on the States or the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, the
Agency has determined that no further assessment of federalism
implications is necessary.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000,
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' the
Agency has assessed the impact of this proposed directive on Indian
Tribes and has determined that it does not have substantial direct or
unique effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. The proposed directive does not have
tribal implications, affect the rights of Indian tribes to self-
governance, and does not impact tribal sovereignty or self-
determination. Specifically, the proposed directive represents a
compilation and consolidation of existing invasive species management
authorities, roles, and responsibilities focused on the duties of
Forest Service personnel on the National Forest System, and does not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments
or preempt tribal law. Therefore, after discussions and coordination
with the Forest Service Office of Tribal Relations and regional Forest
Service tribal coordinators regarding this proposed directive, the
Agency has determined that formal consultation with Tribal governments
on this proposed directive is unnecessary prior to publishing this
proposed directive in the Federal Register.
Implementation of this directive primarily occurs at the local
level (national forest or grassland unit) through land management
planning and project-level planning and accomplishment. Therefore,
coordination with Tribes, other governmental organizations, and the
public is most applicable at the forest and grassland level because it
is at that level that specific invasive species management goals and
objectives are established. Also, at that level the design and effects
of invasive species management activities are most effectively managed
in relation to the Agency's tribal trust responsibilities and Indian
tribal treaty rights.
In addition, during the review and coordination with the Forest
Service Office of Tribal Relations, it was agreed that the Agency would
coordinate an outreach effort through the respective regional OTR
directors/staff regarding the future development of the Forest Service
Handbook for NFS Invasive Species Management; inviting additional
review and collaboration with interested Tribal governments during that
process. This future Forest Service Handbook on Invasive Species
Management would tier directly from this proposed [final] directive and
would provide the detailed operational requirements, standards,
criteria, and guidance which would be most applicable to Tribal
government interests.
No Takings Implications
This proposed directive has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, and it has been determined that the proposed directive
does not pose the risk of a taking of protected private property.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed directive has been reviewed under Executive Order
12988 of February 7, 1996, ``Civil Justice Reform.'' After adoption of
this proposed directive, (1) All state and local laws and regulations
that conflict with this proposed directive or that would impede full
implementation of this directive would be preempted; (2) no retroactive
effect would be given to this proposed directive; and (3) the proposed
directive would not require the use of administrative proceedings
before parties could file suit in court challenging its provisions.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1531-1538), which the President signed into law on March 22,
1995, the Agency has assessed the effects of this proposed directive on
State, local, and Tribal governments and the private sector. This
proposed directive does not compel the expenditure of funds by any
[[Page 32141]]
State, local, or Tribal government or anyone in the private sector.
Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the Act is not required.
Energy Effects
This proposed directive has been reviewed under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use. It has been determined that this proposed
directive does not constitute a significant energy action as defined in
the Executive Order.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public
This proposed directive does not contain any additional record
keeping or reporting requirements or other information collection
requirements as defined in 5 CFR part 1320 that are not already
required by law or not already approved for use, and therefore, imposes
no additional paperwork burden on the public. Accordingly, the review
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not apply.
Dated: May 27, 2011.
Mary Wagner,
Associate Chief.
[FR Doc. 2011-13800 Filed 6-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P