Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Alabama, Georgia, and Tennessee: Chattanooga and Macon; Determination of Attainment by Applicable Attainment Date for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Standards, 31900-31903 [2011-13670]
Download as PDF
31900
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
action is being taken pursuant to section
179(c)(1) of the CAA, and is consistent
with the CAA and its implementing
regulations.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
This action proposes to make a
determination of attainment based on
air quality, and would not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed
determination that the Rome Area
attained the 1997 annual average PM2.5
NAAQS does not have Tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIPs are not
approved to apply in Indian country
located in the states, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Dated: May 23, 2011.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2011–13668 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0408–201132; FRL–
9314–1]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality
Planning Purposes; Alabama, Georgia,
and Tennessee: Chattanooga and
Macon; Determination of Attainment by
Applicable Attainment Date for the
1997 Annual Fine Particulate
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to
determine pursuant to Clean Air Act
(CAA), that the Chattanooga, TennesseeGeorgia, fine particulate (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘the Chattanooga Area’’) and the
Macon, Georgia PM2.5 nonattainment
area (hereafter referred to as ‘‘the Macon
Area’’) attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS) by the applicable attainment
date of April 5, 2010. The
determinations of attainment were
previously proposed by EPA on March
22, 2011, and were based on qualityassured and certified monitoring data
for the 2007—2009 monitoring period.
The Chattanooga Area is comprised of
Hamilton County in Tennessee, Catoosa
and Walker Counties in Georgia, and a
portion of Jackson County in Alabama.
The Macon Area is comprised of Bibb
County in its entirety and a portion of
Monroe County in Georgia. EPA is now
proposing to find that both of the aboveidentified areas attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by their
applicable attainment dates. EPA is
proposing these actions because they are
consistent with the CAA and its
implementing regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 5, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2011–0408, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0408,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms.
Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2011–
0408. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Waterson or Joel Huey of the Regulatory
Development Section, in the Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Sara
Waterson may be reached by phone at
(404) 562–9061, or via electronic mail at
waterson.sara@epa.gov. Joel Huey may
be reached by phone at (404) 562–9104,
or via electronic mail at
huey.joel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. What are the actions EPA is taking?
II. What is the background for these actions?
III. What is the air quality for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2007–2009
monitoring period?
A. Chattanooga
B. Macon
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
31901
V. What are the proposed actions?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
II. What is the background for these
actions?
I. What are the actions is EPA taking?
Based on EPA’s review of the qualityassured and certified monitoring data
for 2007–2009, and in accordance with
section 179(c)(1) of the CAA and EPA’s
regulations, EPA proposes to determine
that the Chattanooga and Macon Areas
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
by the applicable attainment date of
April 5, 2010.
On March 22, 2011, EPA published
two proposed rulemakings to make
determinations of attainment to suspend
the requirements for the Chattanooga
and Macon Areas to submit attainment
demonstrations and associated
reasonably available control measures
(RACM), reasonable further progress
(RFP) plans, contingency measures, and
other planning State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revisions related to
attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS so long as the Areas continue
to attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
See 76 FR 15895 for the proposed
rulemaking related to the Chattanooga
Area; see 76 FR 15892 for the proposed
rulemaking related to the Macon Area.
Those proposed rulemakings also
include useful background information
on the PM2.5 NAAQS relevant to the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas. EPA is
moving forward with final action on the
proposals to find that the Chattanooga
and Macon Areas are attaining the PM2.5
NAAQS. Today’s proposed actions,
however, make determinations that the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas attained
the1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the
applicable attainment date of April 5,
2010. These actions are not a reproposal of the March 22, 2011,
attainment determinations to suspend
the requirements for the Chattanooga
and Macon Areas to submit an
attainment demonstration and
associated RACM, a RFP plan,
contingency measures, and other
planning SIP revisions related to
attainment of the standard. Rather,
today’s actions are simply focused on
the date by which the areas had
attaining data.
As nonattainment areas for the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the Chattanooga
and Macon Areas had an applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010 (based
on 2007–2009 monitoring data).
Pursuant to section 179(c) of the CAA,
EPA is required to make a determination
on whether the Areas attained the
standard by their applicable attainment
date. Specifically, section 179(c)(1) of
the CAA reads as follows: ‘‘As
expeditiously as practicable after the
applicable attainment date for any
nonattainment area, but not later than 6
months after such date, the
Administrator shall determine, based on
the area’s air quality as of the attainment
date, whether the area attained the
standard by that date.’’ Today’s action is
EPA’s proposal that the Chattanooga
and Macon areas attained the annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
III. What is the air quality for the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2007–2009
monitoring period?
Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR
50.7, the 1997 annual primary and
secondary PM2.5 standards are met when
the annual arithmetic mean
concentration, as determined in
accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix N, is less than or equal to
15.0 μg/m3 at all relevant monitoring
sites in the subject area.
EPA reviewed the ambient air
monitoring data for the Chattanooga and
Macon Areas in accordance with the
provisions of 40 CFR part 50, Appendix
N. All data considered have been
quality-assured, certified, and recorded
in EPA’s Air Quality System database.
This review addresses air quality data
collected in the 3-year period from
2007–2009. The 3-year period from
2007–2009 is the period EPA must
consider for areas that had an applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010.
A. Chattanooga
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
31902
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE CHATTANOOGA AREA (2007–2009)
Site name
Tombras Avenue .........................................................................................................................................
Soddy Daisy High School ............................................................................................................................
Siskin Drive ..................................................................................................................................................
Rossville .......................................................................................................................................................
As shown above in Table 1, during
the 2007–2009 design period, the
Chattanooga Area met the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. The official annual
design value for the Chattanooga Area
Annual average
concentration
(μg/m3)
Site No.
for the 2007–2009 period is 12.7 μg/m3.
More detailed information on the
monitoring data for the Chattanooga
Area during the 2007–2009 design
period is provided in EPA’s March 22,
47–065–0031
47–065–1011
47–065–4002
13–295–0002
12.6
11.7
12.7
1 12.3
2011, proposed rulemaking to approve
the clean data determination for the
Chattanooga Area for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 15895.
B. Macon
TABLE 2—ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE MACON AREA (2007–2009)
Site name
Site No.
Macon Allied ....................................................................................................................
Macon SE ........................................................................................................................
13–021–0007
13–021–0012
As shown above in Table 2, during
the 2007–2009 design period, the Macon
Area met the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
both with and without data substitution.
The official annual design value for the
Macon Area for the 2007–2009 period is
13.7 μg/m3. More detailed information
on the monitoring data for the Macon
Area during the 2007–2009 design
period is provided in EPA’s March 22,
2011, proposed rulemaking to approve
the clean data determination for the
Macon Area for the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS. See 76 FR 15892.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Annual average
concentration
(μg/m3) without
data substitution
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
Today’s actions are only proposed
determinations that the Chattanooga and
Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by their applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010,
consistent with CAA section 179(c)(1).
Finalizing these proposed actions would
not constitute a redesignation of either
the Chattanooga or Macon Areas to
attainment of 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the
CAA. Further, finalizing these proposed
actions do not involve approving
maintenance plans for either the
Chattanooga or Macon Areas as required
under section 175A of the CAA, nor
would it find that the Chattanooga or
Macon Areas have met all other
requirements for redesignation. Even if
1 The Rossville site did not meet 75 percent data
completeness for the 2007–2009 time period due to
roof replacement and subsequent relocation of the
monitor. Because the site passed data substitution
analysis, the design value for the Area is the highest
reading monitor, which is Tombras Avenue.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
EPA finalizes today’s proposed actions,
the designation status of the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas would
remain nonattainment for the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as
EPA determines that the individual area
meets the CAA requirements for
redesignation to attainment and takes
action to redesignate the individual
area.
V. What are the proposed actions?
EPA is proposing to determine, based
on quality-assured and certified
monitoring data for the 2007–2009
monitoring period, that the Chattanooga
and the Macon Areas attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010. These
proposed actions are being taken
pursuant to section 179(c)(1) of the
CAA, and are consistent with the CAA
and its implementing regulations.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
These actions propose to make
determinations of attainment based on
air quality, and would not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
these proposed actions:
• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
2 Macon Allied design value considers co-located
data where primary data are not available.
3 Macon Allied design value considers data
substitution of 58.1 μg/m3 for all missing data in 1st
quarter of 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Annual average
concentration
(μg/m3) with
data substitution
213.7
314.9
12.0
413.3
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Are not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Are not significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Are not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
4 Macon SE Annual Mean considers data
substitution for second and fourth quarters of 2008
and 3rd quarter of 2009.
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these proposed
determinations that the Chattanooga and
Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual
average PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable
attainment date do not have Tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIPs are not
approved to apply in Indian country
located in the states, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 23, 2011.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2011–13670 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS–R9–ES–2011–0003; MO 92210–
1113F120–B6]
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of petition finding and
initiation of status review.
AGENCY:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
You may submit
information by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for docket
FWS–R9–ES–2011–0003 and then
follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWSFWS–R9–ES–2011–0003; Division of
Policy and Directives Management; U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N.
Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM;
Arlington, VA 22203.
We will post all information received
on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see the Information Solicited section
below for more details).
ADDRESSES:
Janine Van Norman, Chief, Branch of
Foreign Species, Endangered Species
Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420,
Arlington, VA 22203; telephone 703–
358–2171; facsimile 703–358–1735. If
you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), please call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce a 90-day
finding on a petition to reclassify the
Torghar Hills population of straighthorned markhor, or Suleiman markhor,
(Capra falconeri jerdoni or C. f.
megaceros) from endangered to
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
Based on our review, we find that the
petition presents substantial scientific
or commercial information indicating
that reclassifying this subspecies of
markhor in the Torghar Hills of Pakistan
may be warranted. Therefore, with the
publication of this notice, we are
initiating a review of the status of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
To allow us adequate time to
conduct this review, we request that we
receive information on or before August
1, 2011.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a
Petition to Reclassify the StraightHorned Markhor (Capra falconeri
jerdoni) of Torghar Hills as Threatened
SUMMARY:
entire subspecies to determine if the
petitioned action is warranted. To
ensure that this status review is
comprehensive, we are requesting
scientific and commercial data and
other information regarding the straighthorned markhor or the Torghar Hills
population. Based on the status review,
we will issue a 12-month finding on the
petition, which will address whether
the petitioned action is warranted, as
provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.
Information Solicited
When we make a finding that a
petition presents substantial
information indicating that reclassifying
a species may be warranted, we are
required to promptly review the status
of the species (status review). For the
status review to be complete and based
on the best available scientific and
commercial information, we request
information on the straight-horned
markhor from the public, governmental
agencies, Tribal communities, the
scientific community, industry, and any
other interested parties. We seek
information on:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31903
(1) The straight-horned markhor’s
biology, range, and population trends,
including:
(a) Habitat requirements for feeding,
breeding, and sheltering;
(b) Genetics and taxonomy on Capra
falconeri jerdoni and C. f. megaceros to
determine if these two subspecies
constitute a single subspecies;
(c) Historical and current range
including distribution patterns;
(d) Intermountain movement;
(e) Historical and current population
levels, and current and projected trends;
and
(f) Past and ongoing conservation
measures for the subspecies, its habitat,
or both.
(g) Information on the straight-horned
markhor subspecies for the purpose of
determining if the markhor in the
Torghar Hills constitutes a distinct
vertebrate population segment (DPS; see
Evaluation of Listable Entities).
(2) The factors that are the basis for
making a listing/delisting/downlisting
determination for a species under
section 4(a) of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are:
(a) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(b) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
(c) Disease or predation;
(d) The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
(e) Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
(3) Information on whether changing
climatic conditions are affecting the
subspecies or its habitat.
Please include sufficient information
with your submission (such as scientific
journal articles or other publications) to
allow us to verify any scientific or
commercial information you include.
We will base our status review on the
best scientific and commercial
information available, including all
information we receive during the
public comment period. Please note that
comments merely stating support for or
opposition to the action under
consideration without providing
supporting information, although noted,
will not be considered in making a
determination, as section 4(b)(1)(A) of
the Act directs that determinations as to
whether any species is an endangered or
threatened species must be made ‘‘solely
on the basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available.’’ At the
conclusion of the status review, we will
issue the 12-month finding on the
petition, as provided in section
4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31900-31903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13670]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2011-0408-201132; FRL-9314-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Alabama,
Georgia, and Tennessee: Chattanooga and Macon; Determination of
Attainment by Applicable Attainment Date for the 1997 Annual Fine
Particulate Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to determine pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA),
that the Chattanooga, Tennessee-Georgia, fine particulate
(PM2.5) nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as ``the
Chattanooga Area'') and the Macon, Georgia PM2.5
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as ``the Macon Area'')
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010.
The determinations of attainment were previously proposed by EPA on
March 22, 2011, and were based on quality-assured and certified
monitoring data for the 2007--2009 monitoring period. The Chattanooga
Area is comprised of Hamilton County in Tennessee, Catoosa and Walker
Counties in Georgia, and a portion of Jackson County in Alabama. The
Macon Area is comprised of Bibb County in its entirety and a portion of
Monroe County in Georgia. EPA is now proposing to find that both of the
above-identified areas attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
by their applicable attainment dates. EPA is proposing these actions
because they are consistent with the CAA and its implementing
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2011-0408, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: EPA-R04-OAR-2011-0408, Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, Chief,
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2011-0408. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of
[[Page 31901]]
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Waterson or Joel Huey of the
Regulatory Development Section, in the Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Sara Waterson may be reached by phone at (404) 562-9061, or
via electronic mail at waterson.sara@epa.gov. Joel Huey may be reached
by phone at (404) 562-9104, or via electronic mail at
huey.joel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What are the actions EPA is taking?
II. What is the background for these actions?
III. What is the air quality for the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS for the 2007-2009 monitoring period?
A. Chattanooga
B. Macon
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
V. What are the proposed actions?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What are the actions is EPA taking?
Based on EPA's review of the quality-assured and certified
monitoring data for 2007-2009, and in accordance with section 179(c)(1)
of the CAA and EPA's regulations, EPA proposes to determine that the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010.
On March 22, 2011, EPA published two proposed rulemakings to make
determinations of attainment to suspend the requirements for the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas to submit attainment demonstrations and
associated reasonably available control measures (RACM), reasonable
further progress (RFP) plans, contingency measures, and other planning
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions related to attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS so long as the Areas continue to
attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 15895 for the
proposed rulemaking related to the Chattanooga Area; see 76 FR 15892
for the proposed rulemaking related to the Macon Area. Those proposed
rulemakings also include useful background information on the
PM2.5 NAAQS relevant to the Chattanooga and Macon Areas. EPA
is moving forward with final action on the proposals to find that the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas are attaining the PM2.5 NAAQS.
Today's proposed actions, however, make determinations that the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas attained the1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. These actions
are not a re-proposal of the March 22, 2011, attainment determinations
to suspend the requirements for the Chattanooga and Macon Areas to
submit an attainment demonstration and associated RACM, a RFP plan,
contingency measures, and other planning SIP revisions related to
attainment of the standard. Rather, today's actions are simply focused
on the date by which the areas had attaining data.
II. What is the background for these actions?
As nonattainment areas for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS,
the Chattanooga and Macon Areas had an applicable attainment date of
April 5, 2010 (based on 2007-2009 monitoring data). Pursuant to section
179(c) of the CAA, EPA is required to make a determination on whether
the Areas attained the standard by their applicable attainment date.
Specifically, section 179(c)(1) of the CAA reads as follows: ``As
expeditiously as practicable after the applicable attainment date for
any nonattainment area, but not later than 6 months after such date,
the Administrator shall determine, based on the area's air quality as
of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard by that
date.'' Today's action is EPA's proposal that the Chattanooga and Macon
areas attained the annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable
attainment date of April 5, 2010.
III. What is the air quality for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
for the 2007-2009 monitoring period?
Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR 50.7, the 1997 annual primary and
secondary PM2.5 standards are met when the annual arithmetic
mean concentration, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix N, is less than or equal to 15.0 [mu]g/m\3\ at all relevant
monitoring sites in the subject area.
EPA reviewed the ambient air monitoring data for the Chattanooga
and Macon Areas in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix N. All data considered have been quality-assured, certified,
and recorded in EPA's Air Quality System database. This review
addresses air quality data collected in the 3-year period from 2007-
2009. The 3-year period from 2007-2009 is the period EPA must consider
for areas that had an applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010.
A. Chattanooga
[[Page 31902]]
Table 1--Annual Average Concentrations in the Chattanooga Area (2007-
2009)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual average
Site name Site No. concentration
([mu]g/m\3\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tombras Avenue.................... 47-065-0031 12.6
Soddy Daisy High School........... 47-065-1011 11.7
Siskin Drive...................... 47-065-4002 12.7
Rossville......................... 13-295-0002 \1\ 12.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As shown above in Table 1, during the 2007-2009 design period, the
Chattanooga Area met the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The
official annual design value for the Chattanooga Area for the 2007-2009
period is 12.7 [mu]g/m\3\. More detailed information on the monitoring
data for the Chattanooga Area during the 2007-2009 design period is
provided in EPA's March 22, 2011, proposed rulemaking to approve the
clean data determination for the Chattanooga Area for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 15895.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Rossville site did not meet 75 percent data completeness
for the 2007-2009 time period due to roof replacement and subsequent
relocation of the monitor. Because the site passed data substitution
analysis, the design value for the Area is the highest reading
monitor, which is Tombras Avenue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Macon
Table 2--Annual Average Concentrations in the Macon Area (2007-2009)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual average Annual average
concentration concentration
Site name Site No. ([mu]g/m\3\) ([mu]g/m\3\) with
without data data
substitution substitution
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Macon Allied.............................................. 13-021-0007 \2\13.7 \3\14.9
Macon SE.................................................. 13-021-0012 12.0 \4\13.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As shown above in Table 2, during the 2007-2009 design period, the
Macon Area met the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS both with and
without data substitution. The official annual design value for the
Macon Area for the 2007-2009 period is 13.7 [mu]g/m\3\. More detailed
information on the monitoring data for the Macon Area during the 2007-
2009 design period is provided in EPA's March 22, 2011, proposed
rulemaking to approve the clean data determination for the Macon Area
for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 15892.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Macon Allied design value considers co-located data where
primary data are not available.
\3\ Macon Allied design value considers data substitution of
58.1 [mu]g/m\3\ for all missing data in 1st quarter of 2008.
\4\ Macon SE Annual Mean considers data substitution for second
and fourth quarters of 2008 and 3rd quarter of 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. What is the effect of these actions?
Today's actions are only proposed determinations that the
Chattanooga and Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS by their applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010, consistent
with CAA section 179(c)(1). Finalizing these proposed actions would not
constitute a redesignation of either the Chattanooga or Macon Areas to
attainment of 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS under section
107(d)(3) of the CAA. Further, finalizing these proposed actions do not
involve approving maintenance plans for either the Chattanooga or Macon
Areas as required under section 175A of the CAA, nor would it find that
the Chattanooga or Macon Areas have met all other requirements for
redesignation. Even if EPA finalizes today's proposed actions, the
designation status of the Chattanooga and Macon Areas would remain
nonattainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS until such
time as EPA determines that the individual area meets the CAA
requirements for redesignation to attainment and takes action to
redesignate the individual area.
V. What are the proposed actions?
EPA is proposing to determine, based on quality-assured and
certified monitoring data for the 2007-2009 monitoring period, that the
Chattanooga and the Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5,
2010. These proposed actions are being taken pursuant to section
179(c)(1) of the CAA, and are consistent with the CAA and its
implementing regulations.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
These actions propose to make determinations of attainment based on
air quality, and would not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, these proposed actions:
Are not ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not an economically significant regulatory action
based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Are not significant regulatory action subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as
[[Page 31903]]
appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, these proposed determinations that the Chattanooga and
Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual average PM2.5 NAAQS by
its applicable attainment date do not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIPs are not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the states, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 23, 2011.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2011-13670 Filed 6-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P