Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Under Title VII, the ADA, and GINA, 31892-31895 [2011-13629]
Download as PDF
31892
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
references ‘‘§§ 917.16 and 917.21,’’ and
suspend the section indefinitely.
§ 917.29
[Amended]
20. In § 917.29, lift the suspension of
April 4, 1994 (59 FR 10055), remove the
words ‘‘and of the Peach Commodity
Committee’’ and ‘‘each’’ from paragraph
(b), remove the final sentence of
paragraph (d), and suspend the section
indefinitely.
§§ 917.30 through 917.33
[Suspended]
21. Sections 917.30 through 917.33
are suspended indefinitely.
§ 917.36
§ 917.122
§ 917.143
§ 917.150
§ 917.258
§ 917.34
§ 917.259
[Amended]
[Amended]
24. In § 917.35, lift the suspension of
April 4, 1994 (59 FR 10055), remove the
words ‘‘Peach and’’ and ‘‘each’’ wherever
they appear in paragraph (a), remove the
final sentence of paragraph (d), and
suspend the section indefinitely.
[Amended]
25. In § 917.37, remove the final three
sentences of paragraph (b) and suspend
the section indefinitely.
§§ 917.38 through 917.43
[Removed]
[Removed]
36. Remove § 917.258.
23. In § 917.34, lift the suspension of
April 4, 1994 (59 FR 10055), remove the
references ‘‘§§ 917.21 and 917.22’’ in
paragraph (k) and add in their place the
references ‘‘§ 917.21,’’ and suspend the
section indefinitely.
§ 917.37
[Amended]
35. Remove § 917.150.
[Suspended]
[Removed]
37. Remove § 917.259.
§ 917.442
[Removed]
38. Remove § 917.442.
§ 917.459
[Removed]
39. Remove § 917.459.
Dated: May 24, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–13498 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Chapter III
[Docket No. SSA–2011–0042]
[Suspended]
26. Sections 917.38 through 917.43
are suspended indefinitely.
Retrospective Review Under E.O.
13563
§ 917.45
AGENCY:
[Suspended]
ACTION:
27. Section 917.45 is suspended
indefinitely.
§ 917.50
28. Section 917.50 is suspended
indefinitely.
§§ 917.60 through 917.69
[Suspended]
29. Sections 917.60 through 917.69
are suspended indefinitely.
§ 917.100
[Amended]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
30. In § 917.100, lift the suspension of
April 4, 1994 (59 FR 10055), remove the
words ‘‘and peaches,’’ and suspend the
section indefinitely.
§§ 917.101 through 917.115
[Suspended]
31. Sections 917.101 through 917.115
are suspended indefinitely.
§ 917.119
[Amended]
32. In § 917.119, remove paragraph
(a), redesignate paragraphs (b) through
(e) as paragraphs (a) through (d), and
suspend the section indefinitely.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Social Security Administration.
Request for information.
In accordance with Executive
Order (E.O.) 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ we
are announcing that our preliminary
plan for retrospective review is available
for public comment. We are now
requesting comments on the plan.
DATES: To be sure that we consider your
comments, we must receive them by
June 27, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
to RegsReview@ssa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Sussman, Senior Advisor for
Regulations, Social Security
Administration, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401,
(410) 965–1767. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
national toll-free number, 1–800–772–
1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit
our Internet site, Social Security Online,
at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUMMARY:
[Suspended]
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On
January 18, 2011, the President issued
E.O. 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review,’’ which requires
Federal agencies to develop a
preliminary plan to ‘‘periodically review
its existing significant regulations’’
(section 6(b)). On January 25, 2011, we
issued a press release and posted
information on our Open Government
Web site requesting public comment
about which of our regulations we
should review to ensure they are not
outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or
excessively burdensome.
We developed a preliminary plan for
retrospective review and submitted it to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget. The plan focuses on our process
for updating the Listing of Impairments
(Listings) that we use to evaluate
disability claims under titles II and XVI
of the Social Security Act (Act). The
listings are examples of impairments
that we consider severe enough to
prevent an adult from doing any gainful
activity or that we consider severe
enough to result in marked and severe
functional limitations for a child
seeking SSI payments. The plan also
includes two initiatives to reduce
paperwork burdens on the public
imposed by certain agency regulations.
We have posted the preliminary plan
on our Open Government Web site,
https://www.socialsecurity.gov/open/
regsreview, and are now requesting
public comments on the plan. Please
note that in this notice, we are not
requesting comments on the content of
the Listings, but rather on the plan
itself, which describes our process for
updating the Listings. We will carefully
review all comments, but we will not to
respond to them individually.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
34. In § 917.143, lift the suspension of
April 4, 1994 (59 FR 10055); remove the
words ‘‘and peaches’’ from paragraph (b)
introductory text and from paragraphs
(b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(4); remove the
words ‘‘and 200 pounds of peaches’’
from paragraph (b)(3); and suspend the
section indefinitely.
22. Section 917.36 is suspended
indefinitely.
§ 917.35
[Suspended]
33. Section 917.122 is suspended
indefinitely.
Dated: May 25, 2011.
Dean Landis,
Deputy Chief of Staff, Social Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–13620 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1602
RIN 3046–AA89
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements Under Title VII, the ADA,
and GINA
Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
The Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (‘‘EEOC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) proposes to extend its
existing recordkeeping requirements
under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (Title VII) and the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) to entities
covered by title II of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of
2008 (‘‘GINA’’), which prohibits
employment discrimination based on
genetic information.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 1, 2011.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000e–8(c), a
public hearing concerning these
proposed changes will be held at a place
and time to be announced.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments by
mail to Stephen Llewellyn, Executive
Officer, Executive Secretariat, Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission,
131 M Street, NE., Suite 6NE03F,
Washington, DC 20507. Written
comments of six or fewer pages may be
faxed to the Executive Secretariat at
(202) 663–4114. (There is no toll free
FAX number.) Receipt of facsimile
transmittals will not be acknowledged,
except that the sender may request
confirmation of receipt by calling the
Executive Secretariat staff at (202) 663–
4070 (voice) or (202) 663–4074 (TTY).
(These are not toll free numbers.) In lieu
of sending written comments, comments
may be submitted to EEOC
electronically on the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. After accessing
this Web site, follow its instructions for
submitting comments.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide.
Copies of the received comments also
will be available for inspection in the
EEOC Library by advance appointment
only, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday except legal holidays.
Persons who schedule an appointment
in the EEOC Library and need assistance
to view the comments will be provided
with appropriate aids upon request,
such as readers or print magnifiers. To
schedule an appointment to inspect the
comments at the EEOC Library, contact
the EEOC Library by calling (202) 663–
4630 (voice) or (202) 663–4641 (TTY).
(These are not toll free numbers.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas J. Schlageter, Assistant Legal
Counsel, (202) 663–4668, or Erin N.
Norris, Senior Attorney, (202) 663–4876,
Office of Legal Counsel, 131 M Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20507. Copies of
this notice are available in the following
alternate formats: Large print, braille,
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
electronic computer disk, and audio
tape. Requests for this notice in an
alternative format should be made to the
Publications Center at 1–800–699–3362
(voice), 1–800–800–3302 (TTY), or 703–
821–2098 (FAX—this is not a toll free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
21, 2008, President George W. Bush
signed the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (‘‘GINA’’)
into law. Title II of GINA protects job
applicants, current and former
employees, labor union members, and
apprentices and trainees from
discrimination based on their genetic
information. Title II of GINA’s coverage
corresponds with that of title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
covering employers with 15 or more
employees, employment agencies, labor
unions, and joint labor-management
training programs, as well as Federal
sector employers. Title II became
effective on November 21, 2009. EEOC
has issued interpretive regulations
under GINA (See 75 FR 68912). Further,
EEOC issued a final rule implementing
changes to its administrative and
procedural regulations in a separate
notice found at 74 FR 63981. In the
current rulemaking, EEOC is proposing
to amend its recordkeeping regulations
to add references to GINA. Neither
EEOC’s existing recordkeeping
regulations nor this proposal requires
creation of any documents. The
proposed change would impose the
same record retention requirements
under GINA that are imposed under
Title VII and the ADA, i.e., any records
made or kept must be retained for the
period of time specified in the Title VII
and ADA regulations.
The EEOC proposal does not impose
any reporting requirements under GINA,
but reserves the right in the future to
issue reporting regulations as may be
necessary to accomplish the purposes of
GINA.
Persons wishing to present their
views orally should notify the
Commission of their desire to do so in
writing no later than July 5, 2011 with
a request to Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat,
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, 131 M Street, NE., Suite
6NE03F, Washington, DC 20507. The
request should include a written
summary of the remarks to be offered.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Commission has complied with
the principles in section 1(b) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31893
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review. This
rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under section 3(f) of the Order
12866, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of the
Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed changes to EEOC’s
existing regulations contain information
collection requirements subject to
review and approval by the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. It is
estimated that the public recordkeeping
burden will not increase significantly as
a result of the amendments because all
employers affected by them are already
required to retain all personnel or
employment records that they make or
keep for one year, and the only new
requirement is that they retain those
records relevant to a charge of
discrimination filed under GINA until
the charge is resolved. As required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
is submitting to the Office of
Management and Budget a request for
approval of these information collection
requirements under section 3507(d) of
the Act. Organizations or individuals
desiring to submit comments for
consideration by OMB on these
information collection requirements
should address them to Chad Lallemand
in the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10235, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503 or by e-mail to
Chad_A._Lallemand@omb.eop.gov.
Collection title: Recordkeeping under
Title VII, the ADA, and GINA.
OMB number: 3046–0040.
Description of affected public:
Employers with 15 or more employees
are subject to Title VII, the ADA, and
GINA.
Number of respondents: 899,580.
Reporting hours: Not applicable.
Number of forms: None.
Federal cost: None.
Abstract: Section 207 of GINA, 42
U.S.C. 2000ff et seq., incorporates the
powers, procedures, and remedies
found in section 709 of Title VII.
Section 709(c) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
2000e–8(c), requires the Commission to
establish regulations pursuant to which
employers subject to the Act shall
preserve certain records to assist the
EEOC in assuring compliance with the
Act’s nondiscrimination in employment
requirements. Any of the records
maintained which are subsequently
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
31894
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
disclosed to the EEOC during an
investigation are protected from public
disclosure by the confidentiality
provisions of sections 706(b) and 709(e)
of Title VII. EEOC has issued
recordkeeping regulations under Title
VII and the ADA which require all
covered entities to maintain all
employment and personnel records they
make or keep for a period of one year
and all records relevant to a Title VII or
ADA charge until the charge is resolved.
The proposed revision will extend these
same requirements to records relevant to
a GINA charge.
Burden statement: This recordkeeping
requirement does not require reports or
the creation of new documents; it
merely requires retention of documents
that the employer has already made or
kept, and the burden imposed by these
regulations is therefore minimal. An
employer subject to the existing
requirement in 29 CFR part 1602
currently must retain all personnel or
employment records made or kept by
that employer for one year, and must
retain any records relevant to charges
filed under Title VII or the ADA until
final disposition of those matters, which
may be longer than one year. This
proposed rulemaking would require
employers to also retain documents
relevant to charges filed under GINA
until final disposition of those charges.
Existing Burdens Prior to Change
—Establishing Recordkeeping System:
There are 899,580 employers subject
to the recordkeeping requirement in
Part 1602. The currently approved
Title VII and ADA recordkeeping
requirement in Part 1602 imposes a
total burden on covered employers in
the aggregate of approximately 16,002
hours, which represents the
aggregated time that must be spent by
all new firms taken together to ensure
that their record maintenance systems
comply with EEOC’s recordkeeping
requirements. Based on the fact that
these regulations do not require
employers to create any records and
do not impose any reporting
requirements, but merely require
employers to maintain the records
that they do create, we estimate that
it would take each new firm ten
minutes or less to comply. Established
firms bear no burden under this
analysis, because their systems for
retaining Title VII and ADA records
are already in place.
—Retention of Records When Charge Is
Filed: For firms that have
recordkeeping systems in place, the
fact that a Title VII or ADA charge is
filed should not impose any
additional burden, because we
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
assume that employers set up their
recordkeeping systems in such a way
as to ensure that records related to a
charge are retained in accordance
with EEOC regulations.
Effect of Proposed Change on Existing
Burdens
—Establishing Recordkeeping System:
There will be no increase in the
existing burden as a result of this
proposed change. As stated above,
established firms bear no burden
because their systems for retaining
employment records under Title VII
and ADA records are already in place.
The burden imposed upon new firms
created after the proposed regulatory
change becomes effective would be
the same as the burden shouldered by
new firms prior to the change because
it will take no longer to set up a
recordkeeping system to retain
records relevant to Title VII, ADA,
and GINA charges than it did to set up
a recordkeeping system to retain
records relevant to Title VII and ADA
charges. Consequently, the aggregate
burden for new firms of establishing
a compliant recordkeeping system
remains at 16,002 hours.
—Retention of Records When Charge Is
Filed: The only employers who may
be subject to an increased burden are
those existing firms that become
parties to charges filed under GINA
and must therefore ensure that
relevant records are retained until the
final disposition of the charges. We
estimate that an employer that is a
party to a GINA charge will need less
than ten minutes to ensure that its
previously existing system of
retaining records pertinent to charges
filed under Title VII and the ADA is
revised to retain records relating to
charges filed under GINA (based upon
our estimate that a new firm would
need 10 minutes to set up its
recordkeeping system to comply with
EEOC regulations). Assuming that 200
GINA charges will be filed and using
a burden estimate of 10 minutes per
charge, the annual aggregate burden
would increase by only about 33
hours. This estimated increase is most
likely higher than the actual burden
because approximately 75 percent of
all charges filed under GINA in the
last fiscal year were also filed under
the ADA. In other words, employers
would have been required to maintain
the records relevant to 75 percent of
the GINA charges under the existing
recordkeeping requirements because
those records were relevant to ADA
charges.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, and OMB regulation 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1), the Commission solicits
public comment to enable it to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
Commission’s functions, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Commission’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Title II of GINA applies to all
employers with fifteen or more
employees, approximately 822,000 of
which are small firms (entities with 15–
500 employees) according to data
provided by the Small Business
Administration Office of Advocacy. See
Firm Size Data at https://sba.gov/advo/
research/data.html#us. We estimate that
there will be 200 new charges filed
under GINA per year. We estimate that
typical human resources professionals
will need to dedicate no more than ten
minutes per charge to satisfy the
requirements of the amended regulation
by altering the employer’s record
retention system to retain any personnel
documents relevant to a charge of
discrimination under GINA until the
resolution of the matter. We further
estimate that the median hourly pay rate
of an HR professional is approximately
$46.40. See Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Occupational Employment and Wages,
May 2009 at https://www.bls.gov/oes/
current/oes113049.htm. Even assuming
that every one of the estimated 200
GINA charges is filed against a small
business, EEOC does not believe that a
cost of approximately $7.73 per charge
will be significant for the impacted
small entities. Further, if each of the 200
GINA charges was filed against a
different small entity, 200 affected firms
out of 822,000 is not a substantial
number of small firms. Accordingly, the
Commission certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because any burden it may impose on
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
business entities is minimal. For this
reason, a regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, or Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not
a ‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1602
Administrative practice and
procedure, Equal Employment
Opportunity.
For the Commission.
Dated: May 25, 2011.
Jacqueline A. Berrien,
Chair.
Accordingly, part 1602 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 1602—RECORDKEEPING AND
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER
TITLE VII, THE ADA, AND GINA
1. The authority citation for part 1602
continues to read as follows:
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000e–8, 2000e–12;
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 12117; 42
U.S.C. 2000ff–6.
2. Amend Part 1602 by removing the
words ‘‘title VII or the ADA’’ and adding
in their place the words ‘‘title VII, the
ADA, or GINA’’ in the following places:
• § 1602.14;
• § 1602.21(b);
• § 1602.28(a);
• § 1602.31.
[FR Doc. 2011–13629 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0125]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Magothy
River, Sillery Bay, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary regulated
navigation area (RNA) in certain waters
of the Magothy River, in Sillery Bay,
Maryland, on July 23, 2011. This RNA
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life, property and the environment. This
RNA restricts the movement of vessels
throughout the regulated area during
The Bumper Bash 2011 event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 5, 2011. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before the end of the
comment period.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0125 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald Houck,
Sector Baltimore Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone 410–576–2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31895
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0125),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0125’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31892-31895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13629]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1602
RIN 3046-AA89
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Under Title VII, the
ADA, and GINA
AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 31893]]
SUMMARY: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (``EEOC'' or
``Commission'') proposes to extend its existing recordkeeping
requirements under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title
VII) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to entities covered
by title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
(``GINA''), which prohibits employment discrimination based on genetic
information.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 1, 2011.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8(c), a public hearing concerning these
proposed changes will be held at a place and time to be announced.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments by mail to Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat, Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, 131 M Street, NE., Suite 6NE03F, Washington, DC 20507.
Written comments of six or fewer pages may be faxed to the Executive
Secretariat at (202) 663-4114. (There is no toll free FAX number.)
Receipt of facsimile transmittals will not be acknowledged, except that
the sender may request confirmation of receipt by calling the Executive
Secretariat staff at (202) 663-4070 (voice) or (202) 663-4074 (TTY).
(These are not toll free numbers.) In lieu of sending written comments,
comments may be submitted to EEOC electronically on the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. After accessing this
Web site, follow its instructions for submitting comments.
All comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
Copies of the received comments also will be available for inspection
in the EEOC Library by advance appointment only, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday except legal holidays. Persons who schedule an
appointment in the EEOC Library and need assistance to view the
comments will be provided with appropriate aids upon request, such as
readers or print magnifiers. To schedule an appointment to inspect the
comments at the EEOC Library, contact the EEOC Library by calling (202)
663-4630 (voice) or (202) 663-4641 (TTY). (These are not toll free
numbers.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Schlageter, Assistant Legal
Counsel, (202) 663-4668, or Erin N. Norris, Senior Attorney, (202) 663-
4876, Office of Legal Counsel, 131 M Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.
Copies of this notice are available in the following alternate formats:
Large print, braille, electronic computer disk, and audio tape.
Requests for this notice in an alternative format should be made to the
Publications Center at 1-800-699-3362 (voice), 1-800-800-3302 (TTY), or
703-821-2098 (FAX--this is not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 21, 2008, President George W. Bush
signed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (``GINA'')
into law. Title II of GINA protects job applicants, current and former
employees, labor union members, and apprentices and trainees from
discrimination based on their genetic information. Title II of GINA's
coverage corresponds with that of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, covering employers with 15 or more employees,
employment agencies, labor unions, and joint labor-management training
programs, as well as Federal sector employers. Title II became
effective on November 21, 2009. EEOC has issued interpretive
regulations under GINA (See 75 FR 68912). Further, EEOC issued a final
rule implementing changes to its administrative and procedural
regulations in a separate notice found at 74 FR 63981. In the current
rulemaking, EEOC is proposing to amend its recordkeeping regulations to
add references to GINA. Neither EEOC's existing recordkeeping
regulations nor this proposal requires creation of any documents. The
proposed change would impose the same record retention requirements
under GINA that are imposed under Title VII and the ADA, i.e., any
records made or kept must be retained for the period of time specified
in the Title VII and ADA regulations.
The EEOC proposal does not impose any reporting requirements under
GINA, but reserves the right in the future to issue reporting
regulations as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of GINA.
Persons wishing to present their views orally should notify the
Commission of their desire to do so in writing no later than July 5,
2011 with a request to Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer, Executive
Secretariat, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street,
NE., Suite 6NE03F, Washington, DC 20507. The request should include a
written summary of the remarks to be offered.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Commission has complied with the principles in section 1(b) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f)
of the Order 12866, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These proposed changes to EEOC's existing regulations contain
information collection requirements subject to review and approval by
the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
It is estimated that the public recordkeeping burden will not increase
significantly as a result of the amendments because all employers
affected by them are already required to retain all personnel or
employment records that they make or keep for one year, and the only
new requirement is that they retain those records relevant to a charge
of discrimination filed under GINA until the charge is resolved. As
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission is submitting to the Office of Management and
Budget a request for approval of these information collection
requirements under section 3507(d) of the Act. Organizations or
individuals desiring to submit comments for consideration by OMB on
these information collection requirements should address them to Chad
Lallemand in the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by e-mail to Chad_A._Lallemand@omb.eop.gov.
Collection title: Recordkeeping under Title VII, the ADA, and GINA.
OMB number: 3046-0040.
Description of affected public: Employers with 15 or more employees
are subject to Title VII, the ADA, and GINA.
Number of respondents: 899,580.
Reporting hours: Not applicable.
Number of forms: None.
Federal cost: None.
Abstract: Section 207 of GINA, 42 U.S.C. 2000ff et seq.,
incorporates the powers, procedures, and remedies found in section 709
of Title VII. Section 709(c) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8(c),
requires the Commission to establish regulations pursuant to which
employers subject to the Act shall preserve certain records to assist
the EEOC in assuring compliance with the Act's nondiscrimination in
employment requirements. Any of the records maintained which are
subsequently
[[Page 31894]]
disclosed to the EEOC during an investigation are protected from public
disclosure by the confidentiality provisions of sections 706(b) and
709(e) of Title VII. EEOC has issued recordkeeping regulations under
Title VII and the ADA which require all covered entities to maintain
all employment and personnel records they make or keep for a period of
one year and all records relevant to a Title VII or ADA charge until
the charge is resolved. The proposed revision will extend these same
requirements to records relevant to a GINA charge.
Burden statement: This recordkeeping requirement does not require
reports or the creation of new documents; it merely requires retention
of documents that the employer has already made or kept, and the burden
imposed by these regulations is therefore minimal. An employer subject
to the existing requirement in 29 CFR part 1602 currently must retain
all personnel or employment records made or kept by that employer for
one year, and must retain any records relevant to charges filed under
Title VII or the ADA until final disposition of those matters, which
may be longer than one year. This proposed rulemaking would require
employers to also retain documents relevant to charges filed under GINA
until final disposition of those charges.
Existing Burdens Prior to Change
--Establishing Recordkeeping System: There are 899,580 employers
subject to the recordkeeping requirement in Part 1602. The currently
approved Title VII and ADA recordkeeping requirement in Part 1602
imposes a total burden on covered employers in the aggregate of
approximately 16,002 hours, which represents the aggregated time that
must be spent by all new firms taken together to ensure that their
record maintenance systems comply with EEOC's recordkeeping
requirements. Based on the fact that these regulations do not require
employers to create any records and do not impose any reporting
requirements, but merely require employers to maintain the records that
they do create, we estimate that it would take each new firm ten
minutes or less to comply. Established firms bear no burden under this
analysis, because their systems for retaining Title VII and ADA records
are already in place.
--Retention of Records When Charge Is Filed: For firms that have
recordkeeping systems in place, the fact that a Title VII or ADA charge
is filed should not impose any additional burden, because we assume
that employers set up their recordkeeping systems in such a way as to
ensure that records related to a charge are retained in accordance with
EEOC regulations.
Effect of Proposed Change on Existing Burdens
--Establishing Recordkeeping System: There will be no increase in the
existing burden as a result of this proposed change. As stated above,
established firms bear no burden because their systems for retaining
employment records under Title VII and ADA records are already in
place. The burden imposed upon new firms created after the proposed
regulatory change becomes effective would be the same as the burden
shouldered by new firms prior to the change because it will take no
longer to set up a recordkeeping system to retain records relevant to
Title VII, ADA, and GINA charges than it did to set up a recordkeeping
system to retain records relevant to Title VII and ADA charges.
Consequently, the aggregate burden for new firms of establishing a
compliant recordkeeping system remains at 16,002 hours.
--Retention of Records When Charge Is Filed: The only employers who may
be subject to an increased burden are those existing firms that become
parties to charges filed under GINA and must therefore ensure that
relevant records are retained until the final disposition of the
charges. We estimate that an employer that is a party to a GINA charge
will need less than ten minutes to ensure that its previously existing
system of retaining records pertinent to charges filed under Title VII
and the ADA is revised to retain records relating to charges filed
under GINA (based upon our estimate that a new firm would need 10
minutes to set up its recordkeeping system to comply with EEOC
regulations). Assuming that 200 GINA charges will be filed and using a
burden estimate of 10 minutes per charge, the annual aggregate burden
would increase by only about 33 hours. This estimated increase is most
likely higher than the actual burden because approximately 75 percent
of all charges filed under GINA in the last fiscal year were also filed
under the ADA. In other words, employers would have been required to
maintain the records relevant to 75 percent of the GINA charges under
the existing recordkeeping requirements because those records were
relevant to ADA charges.
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and OMB regulation
5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the Commission solicits public comment to enable it
to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the Commission's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Title II of GINA applies to all employers with fifteen or more
employees, approximately 822,000 of which are small firms (entities
with 15-500 employees) according to data provided by the Small Business
Administration Office of Advocacy. See Firm Size Data at https://sba.gov/advo/research/data.html#us. We estimate that there will be 200
new charges filed under GINA per year. We estimate that typical human
resources professionals will need to dedicate no more than ten minutes
per charge to satisfy the requirements of the amended regulation by
altering the employer's record retention system to retain any personnel
documents relevant to a charge of discrimination under GINA until the
resolution of the matter. We further estimate that the median hourly
pay rate of an HR professional is approximately $46.40. See Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2009 at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes113049.htm. Even assuming that every one of
the estimated 200 GINA charges is filed against a small business, EEOC
does not believe that a cost of approximately $7.73 per charge will be
significant for the impacted small entities. Further, if each of the
200 GINA charges was filed against a different small entity, 200
affected firms out of 822,000 is not a substantial number of small
firms. Accordingly, the Commission certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because any burden it may impose on
[[Page 31895]]
business entities is minimal. For this reason, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local,
or Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action does not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties and, accordingly, is not a ``rule'' as that term
is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1602
Administrative practice and procedure, Equal Employment
Opportunity.
For the Commission.
Dated: May 25, 2011.
Jacqueline A. Berrien,
Chair.
Accordingly, part 1602 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1602--RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER TITLE
VII, THE ADA, AND GINA
1. The authority citation for part 1602 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8, 2000e-12; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 12117; 42 U.S.C. 2000ff-6.
2. Amend Part 1602 by removing the words ``title VII or the ADA''
and adding in their place the words ``title VII, the ADA, or GINA'' in
the following places:
Sec. 1602.14;
Sec. 1602.21(b);
Sec. 1602.28(a);
Sec. 1602.31.
[FR Doc. 2011-13629 Filed 6-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P