Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Surface Coating Processes, 31856-31858 [2011-13267]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31856
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: https://
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 222
Education, Grant programs—
education, Application procedures,
Construction programs.
Dated: May 26, 2011.
´
Thelma Melendez de Santa Ana,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2011–13590 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0099; FRL–9312–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Adoption of Control
Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood
Paneling Surface Coating Processes
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania). This SIP
revision includes amendments to
Chapter 121—General Provisions and
Chapter 129—Standards for Sources, of
Title 25 of the Pennsylvania Code.
Pennsylvania’s SIP revision meets the
requirement to adopt Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)
for sources covered by EPA’s Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards
for flat wood paneling surface coating
SUMMARY:
processes. EPA is approving this
revision concerning the adoption of the
EPA CTG requirements for flat wood
paneling surface coating processes in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on July 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0099. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during
normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality
Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, 42
U.S.C. 7511a(b)(2), requires that States
having moderate nonattainment areas
for ozone revise their SIP to include
provisions requiring the implementation
of RACT for certain sources, including
categories of Volatile Organic
Compound (VOC) sources covered by a
CTG document issued by the
Administrator between November 15,
1990 and the date of attainment. EPA
originally developed CTG standards for
flat wood paneling surface coating
processes in 1978 and revised them in
2006. Pennsylvania subsequently made
changes to its SIP which adopted EPA’s
CTG standards for flat wood paneling
surface coating processes. The formal
SIP revision was submitted by
Pennsylvania to EPA on January 4,
2011. On March 14, 2011 (76 FR 13567),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for Pennsylvania. The
NPR proposed approval of
Pennsylvania’s SIP revision for adoption
of the CTG standards for flat wood
paneling surface coating processes. The
formal SIP revision was submitted by
Pennsylvania on January 4, 2011.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On January 4, 2011, PADEP submitted
to EPA a SIP revision concerning the
adoption of the CTG standards for flat
wood paneling surface coating
processes. EPA develops CTGs as
guidance on control requirements for
source categories. States can follow the
CTGs or adopt more restrictive
standards. Pennsylvania has adopted
EPA’s CTG standards for flat wood
paneling surface coating processes.
These regulations are in Chapter 121—
General Provisions and in Chapter
129—Standards for Sources, in Title 25
of the Pennsylvania Code. Specifically,
this revision amends the existing
regulations at sections 121.1, 129.51,
129.66, and adds new section 129.52c.
Several definitions were added in
section 121.1, and section 129.51 was
amended to extend coverage to flat
wood paneling surface coating
processes. The new section 129.52c
includes VOC emission limits, work
practices, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements, all of which are
consistent with EPA’s CTG for flat wood
paneling surface coating processes. The
emission limits of VOCs for flat wood
paneling surface coatings are shown in
Table 1. These emission limits apply if
the total actual VOC emissions from all
flat wood paneling surface coating
operations at the facility are equal to or
greater than 15 pounds (lb) (6.8
kilograms (kg)) per day, before
consideration of controls.
TABLE 1—EMISSION LIMITS OF VOCS FOR FLAT WOOD PANELING SURFACE COATINGS
Should meet one of these emission
limits
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Surface coatings, inks, or adhesives applied to the following flat wood paneling categories
lb VOC/gallon
coating solids
Printed interior panels made of hardwood, plywood, or thin particleboard ................................................
Natural finish hardwood plywood panels .....................................................................................................
Class II finishes on hardboard panels .........................................................................................................
Tileboards ....................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
02JNR1
grams VOC/Liter
coating solids
350
350
350
350
31857
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—EMISSION LIMITS OF VOCS FOR FLAT WOOD PANELING SURFACE COATINGS—Continued
Should meet one of these emission
limits
Surface coatings, inks, or adhesives applied to the following flat wood paneling categories
lb VOC/gallon
coating solids
Exterior siding ..............................................................................................................................................
Other specific requirements
concerning this rulemaking and the
rationale for EPA’s action are explained
in the NPR and the Technical Support
Document (TSD) and will not be
restated here. No public comments were
received on the NPR.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Pennsylvania’s
adoption of the CTG requirements for
flat wood paneling surface coating
processes as a revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
grams VOC/Liter
coating solids
2.9
350
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by August 1, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
concerning Pennsylvania’s adoption of a
CTG for flat wood paneling surface
coating processes may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: May 9, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(c)(1) is amended by revising the entries
for Sections 121.1, 129.51 and 129.66;
and adding an entry for Section 129.52c
after the existing entry for Section
129.52. The amendments read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
*
*
31858
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
State effective date
State citation
Title/subject
Title 25—Environmental
Protection
Article III—Air Resources
Chapter 121—General
Provisions
Section 121.1 ................
Definitions ..........................................................
EPA approval date
Additional explanation/
§ 52.2063 citation
12/18/10
6/2/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
Eighteen new definitions
are added.
*
Chapter 129—Standards for Sources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Sources of VOCs
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Section 129.51 ..............
*
*
*
General ..............................................................
12/18/10
*
*
6/2/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
Paragraph 129.51(a) is
amended.
*
Section 129.52c ............
*
*
*
Control of VOC emissions from flat wood paneling surface coating processes.
12/18/10
*
*
6/2/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
New section is added.
*
Section 129.66 ..............
*
*
*
Compliance schedules and final compliance
dates.
12/18/10
*
*
6/2/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
This section is amended.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–13267 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0055–201136; FRL–
9313–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality
Planning Purposes; Georgia: Macon;
Determination of Attaining Data for the
1997 Annual Fine Particulate Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA has determined that the
Macon, Georgia, fine particulate (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘the Macon Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’) has
attained the 1997 annual average PM2.5
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS). The Macon Area is
comprised of Bibb County in its entirety
and a portion of Monroe County. This
determination of attainment is based
upon complete, quality-assured and
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
*
*
certified ambient air monitoring data for
the 2007–2009 period showing that the
Area has monitored attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The
requirements for the Area to submit an
attainment demonstration and
associated reasonably available control
measures (RACM), a reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan, contingency
measures, and other planning State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
related to attainment of the standard
shall be suspended so long as the Area
continues to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on July 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0055. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during
normal business hours at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
Huey or Sara Waterson, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Huey
may be reached by phone at (404) 562–
9104 or via electronic mail at
huey.joel@epa.gov. Ms. Waterson may
be reached by phone at (404) 562–9061
or via electronic mail at
waterson.sara@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA taking?
II. What is the effect of this action?
III. What is EPA’s final action?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is determining that the Macon
Area (comprised of Bibb County in its
entirety and a portion of Monroe
E:\FR\FM\02JNR1.SGM
02JNR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31856-31858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13267]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0099; FRL-9312-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood
Paneling Surface Coating Processes
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania). This SIP
revision includes amendments to Chapter 121--General Provisions and
Chapter 129--Standards for Sources, of Title 25 of the Pennsylvania
Code. Pennsylvania's SIP revision meets the requirement to adopt
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for sources covered by
EPA's Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards for flat wood
paneling surface coating processes. EPA is approving this revision
concerning the adoption of the EPA CTG requirements for flat wood
paneling surface coating processes in accordance with the requirements
of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on July 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0099. All documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air
Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7511a(b)(2), requires that
States having moderate nonattainment areas for ozone revise their SIP
to include provisions requiring the implementation of RACT for certain
sources, including categories of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)
sources covered by a CTG document issued by the Administrator between
November 15, 1990 and the date of attainment. EPA originally developed
CTG standards for flat wood paneling surface coating processes in 1978
and revised them in 2006. Pennsylvania subsequently made changes to its
SIP which adopted EPA's CTG standards for flat wood paneling surface
coating processes. The formal SIP revision was submitted by
Pennsylvania to EPA on January 4, 2011. On March 14, 2011 (76 FR
13567), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for
Pennsylvania. The NPR proposed approval of Pennsylvania's SIP revision
for adoption of the CTG standards for flat wood paneling surface
coating processes. The formal SIP revision was submitted by
Pennsylvania on January 4, 2011.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On January 4, 2011, PADEP submitted to EPA a SIP revision
concerning the adoption of the CTG standards for flat wood paneling
surface coating processes. EPA develops CTGs as guidance on control
requirements for source categories. States can follow the CTGs or adopt
more restrictive standards. Pennsylvania has adopted EPA's CTG
standards for flat wood paneling surface coating processes. These
regulations are in Chapter 121--General Provisions and in Chapter 129--
Standards for Sources, in Title 25 of the Pennsylvania Code.
Specifically, this revision amends the existing regulations at sections
121.1, 129.51, 129.66, and adds new section 129.52c. Several
definitions were added in section 121.1, and section 129.51 was amended
to extend coverage to flat wood paneling surface coating processes. The
new section 129.52c includes VOC emission limits, work practices, and
recordkeeping and reporting requirements, all of which are consistent
with EPA's CTG for flat wood paneling surface coating processes. The
emission limits of VOCs for flat wood paneling surface coatings are
shown in Table 1. These emission limits apply if the total actual VOC
emissions from all flat wood paneling surface coating operations at the
facility are equal to or greater than 15 pounds (lb) (6.8 kilograms
(kg)) per day, before consideration of controls.
Table 1--Emission Limits of VOCs for Flat Wood Paneling Surface Coatings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should meet one of these emission
Surface coatings, inks, or limits
adhesives applied to the following -------------------------------------
flat wood paneling categories lb VOC/gallon grams VOC/Liter
coating solids coating solids
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printed interior panels made of 2.9 350
hardwood, plywood, or thin
particleboard....................
Natural finish hardwood plywood 2.9 350
panels...........................
Class II finishes on hardboard 2.9 350
panels...........................
Tileboards........................ 2.9 350
[[Page 31857]]
Exterior siding................... 2.9 350
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other specific requirements concerning this rulemaking and the
rationale for EPA's action are explained in the NPR and the Technical
Support Document (TSD) and will not be restated here. No public
comments were received on the NPR.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Pennsylvania's adoption of the CTG requirements
for flat wood paneling surface coating processes as a revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 1, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action concerning Pennsylvania's adoption of a CTG for
flat wood paneling surface coating processes may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: May 9, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (c)(1) is amended by
revising the entries for Sections 121.1, 129.51 and 129.66; and adding
an entry for Section 129.52c after the existing entry for Section
129.52. The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
[[Page 31858]]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Additional explanation/Sec. 52.2063
date citation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title 25--Environmental Protection
Article III--Air Resources
Chapter 121--General Provisions
Section 121.1......................... Definitions.................. 12/18/10 6/2/11 [Insert page Eighteen new definitions are added.
number where the
document begins].
* * * * * * *
Chapter 129--Standards for Sources
* * * * * * *
Sources of VOCs
* * * * * * *
Section 129.51........................ General...................... 12/18/10 6/2/11 [Insert page Paragraph 129.51(a) is amended.
number where the
document begins].
* * * * * * *
Section 129.52c....................... Control of VOC emissions from 12/18/10 6/2/11 [Insert page New section is added.
flat wood paneling surface number where the
coating processes. document begins].
* * * * * * *
Section 129.66........................ Compliance schedules and 12/18/10 6/2/11 [Insert page This section is amended.
final compliance dates. number where the
document begins].
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-13267 Filed 6-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
