Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Rutherfordton, NC, 31510-31511 [2011-13561]
Download as PDF
31510
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1112; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to:
9–ANM–116–AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
Related Information
(m) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2010–0184, dated September 6,
2010; and Saab Service Bulletin 2000–53–
048, Revision 01, dated September 3, 2009;
for related information.
[FR Doc. 2011–13505 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1330; Airspace
Docket No. 10–ASO–41]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Rutherfordton, NC
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
This action proposes to
amend Class E Airspace at
Rutherfordton, NC, to accommodate the
additional airspace needed for the
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAPs) developed for
Rutherford County Airport. This action
would enhance the safety and airspace
management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 18, 2011. The Director of
the Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part
51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA, Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–
647–5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You
must identify the Docket Number FAA–
2010–1330; Airspace Docket No. 10–
ASO–41, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit and
review received comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Comments Invited
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 20,
2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
Interested persons are invited to
comment on this rule by submitting
such written data, views, or arguments,
as they may desire. Comments that
provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are
particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the
proposal. Comments are specifically
invited on the overall regulatory,
aeronautical, economic, environmental,
and energy-related aspects of the
proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2010–1330; Airspace Docket No. 10–
ASO–41) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management System (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Annotators wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2010–1330; Airspace
Docket No. 10–ASO–41.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received before
the specified closing date for comments
will be considered before taking action
on the proposed rule. The proposal
contained in this notice may be changed
in light of the comments received. A
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerned with this rulemaking will be
filed in the docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can
also be accessed through the FAA’s web
page at https://www.faa.gov/
airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/
publications/airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, room 210, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is considering an
amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend
Class E airspace at Rutherfordton, NC to
provide controlled airspace required to
support new standard instrument
approach procedures for Rutherford
County Airport. The existing Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface would be
modified for the safety and management
of IFR operations.
Class E airspace designations are
published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA
order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010,
and effective September 15, 2010, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This proposed
rulemaking is promulgated under the
authority described in subtitle VII, part
A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This proposed regulation is
within the scope of that authority as it
would amend Class E airspace at
Rutherford County Airport,
Rutherfordton, NC.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9U,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:26 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective
September 15, 2010, is amended as
follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASO NC E5 Rutherfordton, NC [Amended]
Rutherford County Airport, NC
(Lat. 35°25′44″ N., Long. 81°56′06″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 11.6-mile
radius of the Rutherford County Airport.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 13,
2011.
Barry A. Knight,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011–13561 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Parts 217, 241, 298
(Docket Nos OST–98–4043)
RIN 2105–AC71
Aviation Data Modernization
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Transportation (the Department) is
withdrawing a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) issued on February
17, 2005 (70 FR 8140 et seq.) that
proposed revisions to the rules
governing the nature, scope, source of
and means for collecting and processing
aviation traffic data.
We are withdrawing this NPRM
because, after review of all comments,
we have determined that the approach
we proposed to solve the identified
problems does not adequately address a
number of aspects, including measures
that could both enhance the utility,
integrity and accuracy of the data and
reduce the cost of reporting. This action
is being taken to allow for later revision
and refinement of a proposed
methodology for aviation data
modernization.
DATES: June 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Pittaway, Office of Aviation
Analysis, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
Room W86–461, Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 366–8856.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31511
Electronic Access: You can view and
download related documents and public
comments by going to the Web site
https://www.regulations.gov. Enter the
docket number DOT–OST–1998–4043
in the search field.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 15, 1998, the Department
published an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) (63 FR
28128) requesting comment on a variety
of issues related to aviation economic
data collection. The ANPRM noted that
the Origin-Destination Survey of Airline
Passenger Traffic (O&D Survey) and
Form 41, Schedule T–100—U.S. Air
Carrier Traffic and Capacity Data by
Nonstop Segment and On-flight Market
and Form 41, and Schedule T–100(f)—
Foreign Air Carrier Traffic and Capacity
Data by Nonstop Segment and On-flight
Market (the last two are known
collectively as the T–100/T–100(f))O&D
Survey and the T–100/T–100(f)) may
not provide sufficiently reliable data in
some circumstances to ensure that the
Department can meet its obligation to
disseminate information that enables
the transportation system to adapt to the
present and future needs of the
American public. At that time, we stated
our concern that the aviation data
systems should be reviewed and
modernized in order to meet our
statutory responsibilities.
Also, because of difficulties private
industry would have in assembling
these data, the need for scheduled air
traffic information cannot be satisfied
other than through governmental means.
However, while there are no other
sources of comprehensive traffic data
available in the aviation industry, a
significant market exists in supplying
services to supplement the Department’s
information offerings using the service
provider’s own statistical insight and
experience. The public, academics,
manufacturers, airports, air carriers,
local, state and various branches of the
Federal government all remain
dependent on the reliability of this
commercially enhanced data.
Approximately 50 comments were
filed in response to the ANPRM by
airlines, airports, trade associations,
unions, and private citizens who use
this data. Commenters confirmed that
these data are not only critical to the
work of both private and public aviation
stakeholders (including the reporting
airlines themselves), but that there are
universal concerns about the capability
and accuracy of the existing data
collection to satisfy the changing needs
of the industry and its stakeholders. The
respondents overwhelmingly agreed
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31510-31511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13561]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1330; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-41]
Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Rutherfordton, NC
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E Airspace at
Rutherfordton, NC, to accommodate the additional airspace needed for
the Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) developed for
Rutherford County Airport. This action would enhance the safety and
airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the
airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 18, 2011. The
Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA, Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone: 1-800-647-5527; Fax: 202-493-2251. You must identify the
Docket Number FAA-2010-1330; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-41, at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit and review received
comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2010-1330; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-41) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Annotators wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2010-1330; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-41.'' The postcard will
be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through https://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
web page at https://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, room 210, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267-9677, to
request a copy of Advisory circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend Class E airspace at
Rutherfordton, NC to provide controlled airspace required to support
new standard instrument approach procedures for Rutherford County
Airport. The existing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface would be modified for the safety and management of
IFR operations.
Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of
FAA order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
[[Page 31511]]
71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the
use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope
of that authority as it would amend Class E airspace at Rutherford
County Airport, Rutherfordton, NC.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective September 15, 2010,
is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *
ASO NC E5 Rutherfordton, NC [Amended]
Rutherford County Airport, NC
(Lat. 35[deg]25[min]44[sec] N., Long. 81[deg]56[min]06[sec] W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within an 11.6-mile radius of the Rutherford County Airport.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 13, 2011.
Barry A. Knight,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011-13561 Filed 5-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P