Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California, 31677-31678 [2011-13545]
Download as PDF
31677
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices
extension near Laredo and the Lower
Rio Grande Valley, Texas.
In addition, after further study and
interagency coordination, it was
determined that the SR138 and SR18
projects in Los Angeles County and San
Bernardino County, California, should
be combined into one project. A new
NOI was issued and an EIS will be
prepared.
State
Project name
Original
NOI date
Rescinded
NOI date
CA ......
CA ......
CA ......
ID .......
IA ........
ME ......
MS ......
MS ......
MS ......
MS ......
NM .....
NY ......
TN ......
TN ......
TX ......
TX ......
TX ......
TX ......
VA ......
WA .....
WA .....
New State Route 138 project in Los Angeles County ........................................................................................
High Desert Corridor project, State Route 18, in San Bernardino County .........................................................
24th Street Improvement Project in Kern County ...............................................................................................
State Highway 44 in Ada and Canyon County ...................................................................................................
Roadway improvement project in Warren County ..............................................................................................
The Skowhegan transportation and accessibility project in Somerset County ..................................................
I–10/SR–25 connector in Harrison and Stone Counties .....................................................................................
US–49/I–20 interchange in Ranking County .......................................................................................................
US–82/I–69 connector in Washington and Bolivar Counties ..............................................................................
SR–15 near Beaumont, Harrison, George, Greene, Jackson, Perry, and Stone ..............................................
Northwest Loop project in Sandoval and Bernalillo Counties ............................................................................
Bridge Rehabilitation and Interchange Improvements Project, Queens County ................................................
Route 475 in Knoxville, Loudon, Knox, and Anderson Counties .......................................................................
SR–374 extension in Montgomery County .........................................................................................................
SH–71 in Travis County ......................................................................................................................................
US–181/SH–286 in Cameron County .................................................................................................................
US–181/SH–286 in Nueces County ....................................................................................................................
I–69 extension near Laredo and the Lower Rio Grande Valley .........................................................................
Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt in Chesapeake and Virginia Beach .......................................................
Seattle Ferry Terminal (Colman Dock) in Seattle ...............................................................................................
Forest Road 56 in King County ..........................................................................................................................
10/12/07
1/27/2009
4/23/2008
8/28/2007
4/26/2007
11/29/2005
8/12/2005
5/22/2009
11/29/2005
5/28/2009
1/16/2009
3/12/2004
11/4/2005
4/21/2010
6/2/2008
4/6/2007
4/6/2007
1/15/2004
12/24/2003
3/17/2006
4/27/2001
9/24/2010
9/24/2010
11/10/2010
3/17/2011
8/4/2010
9/3/2010
11/22/2010
11/30/2010
12/1/2010
12/28/2010
4/15/2011
9/7/2010
9/21/2010
1/19/2011
9/7/2010
10/15/2010
11/3/2010
1/25/2011
11/17/2010
2/10/2011
2/28/2011
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Issued on: May 23, 2011.
Victor M. Mendez,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–13541 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions
on Proposed Highway in California
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
ACTION:
The FHWA, on behalf of
Caltrans, is issuing this notice to
announce actions taken by Caltrans that
are final within the meaning of 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a
proposed highway project, the US 101/
Broadway Interchange Reconstruction
Project in the City of Burlingame,
County of San Mateo, State of California
(Post Miles 16.30 to 17.06). Those
actions grant licenses, permits, and
approvals for the project.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
By this notice, the FHWA, on
behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public
of final agency actions subject to 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking
judicial review of the Federal agency
actions on the highway project will be
barred unless the claim is filed on or
before November 28, 2011. If the Federal
law that authorizes judicial review of a
claim provides a time period of less
than 180 days for filing such claim, then
that shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie Brent, Caltrans District 4 Office
of Environmental Analysis, 111 Grand
Avenue, P.O. Box 23660, Oakland, CA
94623–0660, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific
Standard Time, Telephone (510) 286–
5231, e-mail melanie_brent@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and
the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed,
environmental responsibilities for this
project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
Notice is hereby given that Caltrans and
certain federal agencies have taken final
agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C.
139(l)(1) by issuing licenses, permits,
and approvals for the US 101/Broadway
Interchange Reconstruction Project in
the State of California. The project will
construct a new seven-lane Broadway
overcrossing approximately 170 feet to
the north of the existing four-lane
structure in the City of Burlingame,
County of San Mateo. The purpose of
the project is to improve traffic
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
movements and access around the
interchange, accommodate future traffic
increases at adjacent intersections,
improve operations at the southbound
US 101 ramps, and increase bicyclist
and pedestrian access. The project
length is 0.76 mile, and construction is
anticipated to take 2 to 2.5 years. The
actions by the Federal agencies, and the
laws under which such actions were
taken, are described in the Initial Study
with Mitigated Negative Declaration/
Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) for
the project, approved on March 18,
2011, in the Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) issued on March 18,
2011, and in other documents in the
FHWA project records. The IS/EA,
FONSI, and other project records are
available by contacting Caltrans at the
address provided above. The Caltrans
IS/EA and FONSI can be viewed and
downloaded from the project Web site at
https://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/documents/
101_broadway_interch/ea_235840_
101bdwy_fed_1_front_matter_thru_
chapter_6.pdf.
This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
such actions were taken, including but
not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q)].
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
31678
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303].
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act
[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section
1536]; Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d)]; Migratory
Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights
Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–
2000(d)(1)].
7. Wetlands and Water Resources:
Clean Water Act (Section 404, Section
401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251–
1377]; Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
[42 U.S.C. 300(f)–300(j)(6)].
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 13112 Invasive
Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: May 25, 2011.
Maiser Khaled,
Acting Director, State Programs, Federal
Highway Administration, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2011–13545 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35500]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Saratoga and North Creek Railway,
LLC—Acquisition and Operation
Exemption–Delaware and Hudson
Railway Company, Inc. d/b/a Canadian
Pacific
Saratoga and North Creek Railway,
LLC (Saratoga),1 a noncarrier, has filed
a verified notice of exemption under 49
CFR 1150.31 to acquire from Delaware
and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.
d/b/a Canadian Pacific (CP) a permanent
and exclusive freight rail easement over,
1 Saratoga is a limited liability company, wholly
owned by San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad (SLRG).
SLRG is a Class III rail carrier and a subsidiary of
Permian Basin Railways, Inc., which in turn is
owned by Iowa Pacific Holdings, LLC.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
and to operate, approximately 16.45miles of rail line known as the
Adirondack Branch extending between
Adirondack Branch milepost 39.44 at or
near Saratoga Springs, NY, and
Adirondack Branch milepost 55.89 at or
near Corinth, NY.2 In addition, Saratoga
states that it will acquire approximately
3.2 miles of operating rights for the
purpose of interchange with CP between
Adirondack Branch milepost 39.44 and
CP’s yard at Saratoga Springs located at
Canadian Subdivision milepost 35.3 The
Town will remain the owner of the
tracks and right-of-way.
Saratoga states that it is negotiating
the terms of an agreement with CP
covering its acquisition of the
permanent and exclusive freight
easement and operating rights over CP’s
reserved operating easement, as well as
an agreement with the Town for the use
of its track and right-of-way.4
This transaction is related to two
simultaneously filed notices of
exemption: (1) Docket No. FD 35500
(Sub-No. 1), Saratoga and North Creek
Railway, LLC–Operation Exemption–
Warren County, NY, in which Saratoga
seeks an exemption under 49 CFR
1150.31 to operate over approximately
39.07 miles of rail line owned by
Warren County, NY, extending between
milepost 55.89 at or near Corinth, NY,
and milepost 94.96 at North Creek, NY;
and (2) Docket No. FD 35499, San Luis
& Rio Grande Railroad–Continuance in
Control Exemption–Saratoga and North
Creek Railway, LLC, in which SLRG
seeks an exemption to continue in
control of Saratoga upon Saratoga’s
becoming a Class III rail carrier. As a
result of these transactions, Saratoga
will have authority to operate from
Saratoga Springs to North Creek.
2 CP sold the underlying track and right-of-way to
the Town of Corinth, NY (the Town), subject to CP’s
reservation of an exclusive and permanent
easement to continue to provide common carrier
freight service over the line. See The Town of
Corinth, NY–Acquisition and Operation
Exemption–Canadian Pac. Ry., FD 34803 (STB
served Jan. 11, 2006 and Mar. 9, 2006). The
transaction was structured so that the Town would
not incur a freight rail common carrier obligation
when it purchased those rail line assets from CP.
See Me. Dep’t of Transp.–Aquis. & Operation
Exemption–Me. Cent. R.R., 8 I.C.C.2d 835 (1991).
Saratoga is acquiring the easement and the
associated freight rail common carrier rights and
obligations that CP reserved for itself at the time of
the sale.
3 By letter filed May 18, 2011, Saratoga explains
that the apparent discrepancy between the
mileposts and total mileage arose over the years
from CP’s making changes to the track or right-ofway with the result that the distance was shortened
and/or the milepost at the point of interchange was
changed.
4 While the parties have not completed the
agreements, Saratoga must acquire sufficient rights
to fully meet the common carrier obligation being
acquired from CP.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Saratoga indicates that its agreement
with the Town will not permit the
collecting, sorting, loading, unloading,
transferring, or transporting of
municipal solid waste or construction
and demolition material.5
Saratoga certifies that its projected
annual revenues as a result of this
transaction will not result in Saratoga’s
becoming a Class II or Class I rail carrier
and will not exceed $5 million.
Saratoga intends to consummate the
transaction in either late June or early
July 2011. The earliest the transaction
may be consummated is after the June
15, 2011 effective date of the exemption
(30 days after the exemption was filed).
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Stay petitions must be
filed no later than June 8, 2011 (at least
7 days before the exemption becomes
effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
35500, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on John D. Heffner, John D.
Heffner, PLLC, 1750 K Street, NW.,
Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: May 26, 2011.
By the Board.
Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011–13493 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35499]
San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad—
Continuance in Control Exemption—
Saratoga and North Creek Railway,
LLC
San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad
(SLRG), a Class III rail carrier, has filed
a verified notice of exemption to
continue in control of Saratoga and
5 Saratoga is reminded that it cannot by contract
avoid its common carrier obligation to transport a
commodity over the line.
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31677-31678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13545]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in
California
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions
by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), pursuant to
23 U.S.C. 327.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is issuing this notice to
announce actions taken by Caltrans that are final within the meaning of
23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a proposed highway project,
the US 101/Broadway Interchange Reconstruction Project in the City of
Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California (Post Miles 16.30
to 17.06). Those actions grant licenses, permits, and approvals for the
project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is advising the
public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim
seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the highway
project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before November
28, 2011. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim
provides a time period of less than 180 days for filing such claim,
then that shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Brent, Caltrans District 4
Office of Environmental Analysis, 111 Grand Avenue, P.O. Box 23660,
Oakland, CA 94623-0660, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time,
Telephone (510) 286-5231, e-mail melanie_brent@dot.ca.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed, environmental responsibilities for
this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Notice is hereby given that
Caltrans and certain federal agencies have taken final agency actions
subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing licenses, permits, and
approvals for the US 101/Broadway Interchange Reconstruction Project in
the State of California. The project will construct a new seven-lane
Broadway overcrossing approximately 170 feet to the north of the
existing four-lane structure in the City of Burlingame, County of San
Mateo. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic movements and
access around the interchange, accommodate future traffic increases at
adjacent intersections, improve operations at the southbound US 101
ramps, and increase bicyclist and pedestrian access. The project length
is 0.76 mile, and construction is anticipated to take 2 to 2.5 years.
The actions by the Federal agencies, and the laws under which such
actions were taken, are described in the Initial Study with Mitigated
Negative Declaration/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) for the project,
approved on March 18, 2011, in the Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) issued on March 18, 2011, and in other documents in the FHWA
project records. The IS/EA, FONSI, and other project records are
available by contacting Caltrans at the address provided above. The
Caltrans IS/EA and FONSI can be viewed and downloaded from the project
Web site at https://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/documents/101_broadway_interch/ea_235840_101bdwy_fed_1_front_matter_thru_chapter_6.pdf.
This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions as of the
issuance date of this notice and all laws under which such actions were
taken, including but not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C.
4321-4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q)].
[[Page 31678]]
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303].
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544 and
Section 1536]; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661-
667(d)]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703-712].
5. Historic and Cultural Resources: Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et
seq.].
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C.
2000(d)-2000(d)(1)].
7. Wetlands and Water Resources: Clean Water Act (Section 404,
Section 401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251-1377]; Safe Drinking Water
Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 300(f)-300(j)(6)].
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898 Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: May 25, 2011.
Maiser Khaled,
Acting Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration,
Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2011-13545 Filed 5-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P