Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California, 31677-31678 [2011-13545]

Download as PDF 31677 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices extension near Laredo and the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. In addition, after further study and interagency coordination, it was determined that the SR138 and SR18 projects in Los Angeles County and San Bernardino County, California, should be combined into one project. A new NOI was issued and an EIS will be prepared. State Project name Original NOI date Rescinded NOI date CA ...... CA ...... CA ...... ID ....... IA ........ ME ...... MS ...... MS ...... MS ...... MS ...... NM ..... NY ...... TN ...... TN ...... TX ...... TX ...... TX ...... TX ...... VA ...... WA ..... WA ..... New State Route 138 project in Los Angeles County ........................................................................................ High Desert Corridor project, State Route 18, in San Bernardino County ......................................................... 24th Street Improvement Project in Kern County ............................................................................................... State Highway 44 in Ada and Canyon County ................................................................................................... Roadway improvement project in Warren County .............................................................................................. The Skowhegan transportation and accessibility project in Somerset County .................................................. I–10/SR–25 connector in Harrison and Stone Counties ..................................................................................... US–49/I–20 interchange in Ranking County ....................................................................................................... US–82/I–69 connector in Washington and Bolivar Counties .............................................................................. SR–15 near Beaumont, Harrison, George, Greene, Jackson, Perry, and Stone .............................................. Northwest Loop project in Sandoval and Bernalillo Counties ............................................................................ Bridge Rehabilitation and Interchange Improvements Project, Queens County ................................................ Route 475 in Knoxville, Loudon, Knox, and Anderson Counties ....................................................................... SR–374 extension in Montgomery County ......................................................................................................... SH–71 in Travis County ...................................................................................................................................... US–181/SH–286 in Cameron County ................................................................................................................. US–181/SH–286 in Nueces County .................................................................................................................... I–69 extension near Laredo and the Lower Rio Grande Valley ......................................................................... Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt in Chesapeake and Virginia Beach ....................................................... Seattle Ferry Terminal (Colman Dock) in Seattle ............................................................................................... Forest Road 56 in King County .......................................................................................................................... 10/12/07 1/27/2009 4/23/2008 8/28/2007 4/26/2007 11/29/2005 8/12/2005 5/22/2009 11/29/2005 5/28/2009 1/16/2009 3/12/2004 11/4/2005 4/21/2010 6/2/2008 4/6/2007 4/6/2007 1/15/2004 12/24/2003 3/17/2006 4/27/2001 9/24/2010 9/24/2010 11/10/2010 3/17/2011 8/4/2010 9/3/2010 11/22/2010 11/30/2010 12/1/2010 12/28/2010 4/15/2011 9/7/2010 9/21/2010 1/19/2011 9/7/2010 10/15/2010 11/3/2010 1/25/2011 11/17/2010 2/10/2011 2/28/2011 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.) Issued on: May 23, 2011. Victor M. Mendez, Federal Highway Administrator. [FR Doc. 2011–13541 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–22–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. AGENCY: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. ACTION: The FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is issuing this notice to announce actions taken by Caltrans that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a proposed highway project, the US 101/ Broadway Interchange Reconstruction Project in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California (Post Miles 16.30 to 17.06). Those actions grant licenses, permits, and approvals for the project. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:48 May 31, 2011 Jkt 223001 By this notice, the FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the highway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before November 28, 2011. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less than 180 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period still applies. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Brent, Caltrans District 4 Office of Environmental Analysis, 111 Grand Avenue, P.O. Box 23660, Oakland, CA 94623–0660, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, Telephone (510) 286– 5231, e-mail melanie_brent@dot.ca.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) assigned, and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) assumed, environmental responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Notice is hereby given that Caltrans and certain federal agencies have taken final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing licenses, permits, and approvals for the US 101/Broadway Interchange Reconstruction Project in the State of California. The project will construct a new seven-lane Broadway overcrossing approximately 170 feet to the north of the existing four-lane structure in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 movements and access around the interchange, accommodate future traffic increases at adjacent intersections, improve operations at the southbound US 101 ramps, and increase bicyclist and pedestrian access. The project length is 0.76 mile, and construction is anticipated to take 2 to 2.5 years. The actions by the Federal agencies, and the laws under which such actions were taken, are described in the Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) for the project, approved on March 18, 2011, in the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) issued on March 18, 2011, and in other documents in the FHWA project records. The IS/EA, FONSI, and other project records are available by contacting Caltrans at the address provided above. The Caltrans IS/EA and FONSI can be viewed and downloaded from the project Web site at https://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/documents/ 101_broadway_interch/ea_235840_ 101bdwy_fed_1_front_matter_thru_ chapter_6.pdf. This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions as of the issuance date of this notice and all laws under which such actions were taken, including but not limited to: 1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– 4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128]. 2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401– 7671(q)]. E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 31678 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices 3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]. 4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and Section 1536]; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d)]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712]. 5. Historic and Cultural Resources: Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]. 6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)– 2000(d)(1)]. 7. Wetlands and Water Resources: Clean Water Act (Section 404, Section 401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251– 1377]; Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 300(f)–300(j)(6)]. 8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898 Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.) Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). Issued on: May 25, 2011. Maiser Khaled, Acting Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. 2011–13545 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. FD 35500] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Saratoga and North Creek Railway, LLC—Acquisition and Operation Exemption–Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. d/b/a Canadian Pacific Saratoga and North Creek Railway, LLC (Saratoga),1 a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. d/b/a Canadian Pacific (CP) a permanent and exclusive freight rail easement over, 1 Saratoga is a limited liability company, wholly owned by San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad (SLRG). SLRG is a Class III rail carrier and a subsidiary of Permian Basin Railways, Inc., which in turn is owned by Iowa Pacific Holdings, LLC. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:48 May 31, 2011 Jkt 223001 and to operate, approximately 16.45miles of rail line known as the Adirondack Branch extending between Adirondack Branch milepost 39.44 at or near Saratoga Springs, NY, and Adirondack Branch milepost 55.89 at or near Corinth, NY.2 In addition, Saratoga states that it will acquire approximately 3.2 miles of operating rights for the purpose of interchange with CP between Adirondack Branch milepost 39.44 and CP’s yard at Saratoga Springs located at Canadian Subdivision milepost 35.3 The Town will remain the owner of the tracks and right-of-way. Saratoga states that it is negotiating the terms of an agreement with CP covering its acquisition of the permanent and exclusive freight easement and operating rights over CP’s reserved operating easement, as well as an agreement with the Town for the use of its track and right-of-way.4 This transaction is related to two simultaneously filed notices of exemption: (1) Docket No. FD 35500 (Sub-No. 1), Saratoga and North Creek Railway, LLC–Operation Exemption– Warren County, NY, in which Saratoga seeks an exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate over approximately 39.07 miles of rail line owned by Warren County, NY, extending between milepost 55.89 at or near Corinth, NY, and milepost 94.96 at North Creek, NY; and (2) Docket No. FD 35499, San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad–Continuance in Control Exemption–Saratoga and North Creek Railway, LLC, in which SLRG seeks an exemption to continue in control of Saratoga upon Saratoga’s becoming a Class III rail carrier. As a result of these transactions, Saratoga will have authority to operate from Saratoga Springs to North Creek. 2 CP sold the underlying track and right-of-way to the Town of Corinth, NY (the Town), subject to CP’s reservation of an exclusive and permanent easement to continue to provide common carrier freight service over the line. See The Town of Corinth, NY–Acquisition and Operation Exemption–Canadian Pac. Ry., FD 34803 (STB served Jan. 11, 2006 and Mar. 9, 2006). The transaction was structured so that the Town would not incur a freight rail common carrier obligation when it purchased those rail line assets from CP. See Me. Dep’t of Transp.–Aquis. & Operation Exemption–Me. Cent. R.R., 8 I.C.C.2d 835 (1991). Saratoga is acquiring the easement and the associated freight rail common carrier rights and obligations that CP reserved for itself at the time of the sale. 3 By letter filed May 18, 2011, Saratoga explains that the apparent discrepancy between the mileposts and total mileage arose over the years from CP’s making changes to the track or right-ofway with the result that the distance was shortened and/or the milepost at the point of interchange was changed. 4 While the parties have not completed the agreements, Saratoga must acquire sufficient rights to fully meet the common carrier obligation being acquired from CP. PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Saratoga indicates that its agreement with the Town will not permit the collecting, sorting, loading, unloading, transferring, or transporting of municipal solid waste or construction and demolition material.5 Saratoga certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of this transaction will not result in Saratoga’s becoming a Class II or Class I rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million. Saratoga intends to consummate the transaction in either late June or early July 2011. The earliest the transaction may be consummated is after the June 15, 2011 effective date of the exemption (30 days after the exemption was filed). If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. Stay petitions must be filed no later than June 8, 2011 (at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective). An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 35500, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on John D. Heffner, John D. Heffner, PLLC, 1750 K Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at https:// www.stb.dot.gov. Decided: May 26, 2011. By the Board. Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. Andrea Pope-Matheson, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2011–13493 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4915–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. FD 35499] San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad— Continuance in Control Exemption— Saratoga and North Creek Railway, LLC San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad (SLRG), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption to continue in control of Saratoga and 5 Saratoga is reminded that it cannot by contract avoid its common carrier obligation to transport a commodity over the line. E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31677-31678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13545]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in 
California

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions 
by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), pursuant to 
23 U.S.C. 327.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is issuing this notice to 
announce actions taken by Caltrans that are final within the meaning of 
23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a proposed highway project, 
the US 101/Broadway Interchange Reconstruction Project in the City of 
Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California (Post Miles 16.30 
to 17.06). Those actions grant licenses, permits, and approvals for the 
project.

DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is advising the 
public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim 
seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the highway 
project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before November 
28, 2011. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim 
provides a time period of less than 180 days for filing such claim, 
then that shorter time period still applies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Brent, Caltrans District 4 
Office of Environmental Analysis, 111 Grand Avenue, P.O. Box 23660, 
Oakland, CA 94623-0660, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, 
Telephone (510) 286-5231, e-mail melanie_brent@dot.ca.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway 
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and the California Department of 
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed, environmental responsibilities for 
this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Notice is hereby given that 
Caltrans and certain federal agencies have taken final agency actions 
subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing licenses, permits, and 
approvals for the US 101/Broadway Interchange Reconstruction Project in 
the State of California. The project will construct a new seven-lane 
Broadway overcrossing approximately 170 feet to the north of the 
existing four-lane structure in the City of Burlingame, County of San 
Mateo. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic movements and 
access around the interchange, accommodate future traffic increases at 
adjacent intersections, improve operations at the southbound US 101 
ramps, and increase bicyclist and pedestrian access. The project length 
is 0.76 mile, and construction is anticipated to take 2 to 2.5 years. 
The actions by the Federal agencies, and the laws under which such 
actions were taken, are described in the Initial Study with Mitigated 
Negative Declaration/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) for the project, 
approved on March 18, 2011, in the Finding of No Significant Impact 
(FONSI) issued on March 18, 2011, and in other documents in the FHWA 
project records. The IS/EA, FONSI, and other project records are 
available by contacting Caltrans at the address provided above. The 
Caltrans IS/EA and FONSI can be viewed and downloaded from the project 
Web site at https://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/documents/101_broadway_interch/ea_235840_101bdwy_fed_1_front_matter_thru_chapter_6.pdf.
    This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions as of the 
issuance date of this notice and all laws under which such actions were 
taken, including but not limited to:
    1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 
4321-4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
    2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q)].

[[Page 31678]]

    3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303].
    4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544 and 
Section 1536]; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661-
667(d)]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703-712].
    5. Historic and Cultural Resources: Section 106 of the National 
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et 
seq.].
    6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 
2000(d)-2000(d)(1)].
    7. Wetlands and Water Resources: Clean Water Act (Section 404, 
Section 401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251-1377]; Safe Drinking Water 
Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 300(f)-300(j)(6)].
    8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898 Federal Actions to Address 
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income 
Populations; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Authority:  23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).

    Issued on: May 25, 2011.
Maiser Khaled,
Acting Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, 
Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2011-13545 Filed 5-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.