United States Standards for Grades of Frozen Onions, 31575-31576 [2011-13501]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices
The 2002 Farm Bill provides that the
Board’s makeup will include three
producers and three peanut industry
representatives from States specified in
each of the following producing regions:
Southeast (Alabama, Georgia, and
Florida); Southwest (Texas, Oklahoma,
and New Mexico); and Virginia/Carolina
(Virginia and North Carolina).
The term ‘‘peanut industry
representatives’’ includes, but is not
limited to, representatives of shellers,
manufacturers, buying points, and
marketing associations and marketing
cooperatives. The 2002 Farm Bill
exempted the appointment of the Board
from the requirements of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act.
USDA invites individuals,
organizations, and groups affiliated with
the categories listed above to nominate
individuals for membership on the
Board. Nominees sought by this action
would fill two positions in the
Southeast region; two positions in the
Southwest region; and two positions in
the Virginia/North Carolina region, one
of which is currently vacant.
Nominees should complete a Peanut
Standards Board Background
Information form and submit it to Mrs.
Clark at the address provided in the
‘‘Addresses’’ section above. Copies of
this form may be obtained at the
Internet site https://www.ams.usda.gov/
PeanutStandardsBoard, or from Mrs.
Clark. USDA seeks a diverse group of
members representing the peanut
industry.
Equal opportunity practices will be
followed in all appointments to the
Board in accordance with USDA
policies. To ensure that the
recommendations of the Board have
taken into account the needs of the
diverse groups within the peanut
industry, membership shall include, to
the extent practicable, individuals with
demonstrated abilities to represent
minorities, women, persons with
disabilities, and limited resource
agriculture producers.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7958.
Dated: May 24, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–13499 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document Number AMS: AMS–FV–08–
0076]
United States Standards for Grades of
Frozen Onions
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is soliciting
comments on its proposal to create new
United States Standards for Grades of
Frozen Onions. USDA has received
additional industry comments from
several discussion drafts. The grade
standards would provide a common
language for trade, a means of
measuring value in the marketing of
frozen onions, and provide guidance in
the effective utilization of frozen onions.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted to: Myron Betts, Processed
Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250; or by fax (202)
690–1527; or via Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the date and page of this issue
of the Federal Register.
Please be advised that the identity of
the individual or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet via https://www.regulations.gov
or https://www.ams.usda.gov/
processedinspection. Any comments
received, regarding these proposed
standards also will be posted on these
sites.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Myron Betts, Processed
Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
0709, So. Building; STOP 0247,
Washington, DC 20250. Phone (202)
720–5021; Fax: (202) 690–1527. Copies
of the proposed U.S. Standards for
Grades of Frozen Onions are available
on the Internet at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/processedinspection
or https://www.regulations.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as
amended, directs and authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture ‘‘to develop and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31575
improve standards of quality, condition,
quantity, grade and packaging and
recommend and demonstrate such
standards in order to encourage
uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.’’
AMS is committed to carrying out this
authority in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request. Those United
States standards for grades of processed
fruits and vegetables no longer appear in
the Code of Federal Regulations but are
maintained by USDA/AMS/Fruit and
Vegetable Programs at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/
processedinspection.
AMS is proposing to establish the
U.S. Standards for Grades of Frozen
Onions using the procedures that appear
in part 36, Title 7 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
Background
AMS received a petition from
American Frozen Food Institute (AFFI),
requesting the development of new
standards for frozen onions. The
petitioners represent almost all of the
processors of frozen onions in the
United States. The petition provided
information on style, sample size, and
product description to develop the
standards.
AMS developed the grade standards
for frozen onions to incorporate
comments from AFFI members,
published notices on the proposed grade
standards in order to receive comments
from interested parties (see 66 FR
21116, 68 FR 11801, 68 FR 27010) as
appropriate and circulated several
discussion drafts between April 2007
and June 2010. AMS received and
evaluated samples of various styles of
frozen onions to collect information on
how to ascertain the grade of frozen
onions. Comments from the trade
association’s members were used to
further develop the proposed standards.
The comments referenced the style of
whole onions and questioned the
specific size ranges for whole peeled
onions and the total allowance for peel
in whole onions. Also the comments
suggested that stem material, sprout
material, and root material be included
as major defects in the ‘‘core material’’
defect category.
In addition, AMS met with members
of AFFI at their annual meeting in
February 2007 to discuss the comments.
AFFI suggested that dark green units
with dark green stripes across 50
percent or more of the onion units
would be considered a defect and under
the style of whole onion units greater
than 3⁄8 inch (10mm) or less than 3⁄4
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
31576
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices
inch (20mm) be addressed. AFFI
requested a change in the style
designations for minced style, and a
correction to the text. The members
agreed with the proposed section
concerning requirements for Styles,
Type I, Whole onions and Type II, Pearl
onions. The members did not agree with
the proposed descriptions in
requirements for whole onions and
pearl onions for Styles: Type I, whole
onions of 3⁄4 inch to 1–7/8 inches in
diameter and Type II, pearl onions of 1⁄4
inch to 7⁄8 inch in diameter. Also, the
members did not agree with the
proposed section concerning Acceptable
Quality Levels (AQLs) for quality
defects and submitted examples of
specifications from buyers. The
members expressed concern because
defects were defined by weight, not by
count. Larger units would be allowed a
smaller number of defects and smaller
units would be allowed a large number
of defects. The members stated that the
definitions of ‘‘good appearance’’ and
‘‘reasonably good appearance’’ were too
similar.
AFFI recommended that the product
description include a heat treatment and
suggested that AMS consider a
requirement that onions be blanched.
AFFI members requested that the
product description be limited to
individually quick frozen onions. There
were also concerns that microbiological
requirements, storage temperatures,
shelf life requirements, and limits for
chemical and pesticide residues were
not addressed in the proposed frozen
onion grade standards.
AMS incorporated these comments to
make further changes to the proposed
grade standards in the discussion draft.
However, in June 2010 AMS received
additional feedback from AFFI
members. These AFFI members
indicated that this and other frozen
vegetable grade standards did not
include requirements for shelf-life,
storage temperature, microbiological, or
chemical pesticide residue.
Nonetheless, commodities covered by
U.S. grade standards must comply with
all of the regulatory food safety
requirements of the Food and Drug
Administration, the Environmental
Protection Agency, and applicable state
and local regulations.
The proposed standards for frozen
onions would continue to use the
standard format for U.S. standards for
grades using ‘‘individual attributes.’’
Specifically, the standards would
provide for the ‘‘individual attribute’’
procedure for product grading with
sample sizes, tolerances, and acceptance
numbers of allowable defects with
single letter grade designation. Also, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 May 31, 2011
Jkt 223001
standards would define the term ‘‘frozen
onions’’ and establish ‘‘strips,’’ ‘‘diced,’’
‘‘whole,’’ ‘‘chopped,’’ and ‘‘other’’ as the
style designations. The proposal also
would define quality factors, AQLs, and
tolerances for defects that affect frozen
onions and determine sample unit sizes
for this commodity. These grade
standards would establish the grade
levels ‘‘A,’’ ‘‘B,’’ and ‘‘Substandard.’’ The
AQLs, tolerances, and acceptance
numbers for each quality factor as
defined for each grade level would also
be established.
The grade of a sample unit of frozen
onions would be ascertained
considering the factors of varietal
characteristics, flavor and odor,
appearance, color, defects, absence of
grit or dirt, and character.
These grade standards would provide
a common language for trade, a means
of measuring value in the marketing of
frozen onions, and provide guidance in
the effective utilization of frozen onions.
The official grade of a lot of frozen
onions covered by these standards
would be determined by the procedures
set forth in the Regulations Governing
Inspection and Certification of
Processed Products Thereof, and Certain
Other Processed Foods Products (§ 52.1
to 52.83).
AMS is publishing this notice with a
sixty-day comment period that will
provide a sufficient amount of time for
interested persons to comments on the
proposed new standards for frozen
onions.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: May 24, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–13501 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2011–0035]
Notice of Request for Extension of
Approval of an Information Collection;
Importation of Clementines From
Spain
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Extension of approval of an
information collection; comment
request.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Animal and Plant
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Health Inspection Service’s intention to
request an extension of approval of an
information collection associated with
regulations for the importation of
clementines from Spain.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before August 1,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/main?main=DocketDetail&
d=APHIS-2011-0035 to submit or view
comments and to view supporting and
related materials available
electronically.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send one copy of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2011–0035,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2011–0035.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on regulations for the
importation of clementines from Spain,
contact Mr. William Wesela, Staff
Officer, Preclearance, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 60, Riverdale, MD
20737–1236; (301) 734–5718. For copies
of more detailed information on the
information collection, contact Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS’ Information
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–
2908.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title:
Importation of Clementines From Spain.
OMB Number: 0579–0203.
Type of Request: Extension of an
approval of an information collection.
Abstract: The Plant Protection Act
(PPA, 7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.) authorizes
the Secretary of Agriculture to restrict
the importation, entry, or interstate
movement of plants, plant products, and
other articles to prevent the
introduction of plant pests, including
fruit flies, into the United States or their
dissemination within the United States.
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31575-31576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13501]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document Number AMS: AMS-FV-08-0076]
United States Standards for Grades of Frozen Onions
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is soliciting comments on its proposal to create new
United States Standards for Grades of Frozen Onions. USDA has received
additional industry comments from several discussion drafts. The grade
standards would provide a common language for trade, a means of
measuring value in the marketing of frozen onions, and provide guidance
in the effective utilization of frozen onions.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to: Myron Betts, Processed
Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250; or by fax (202) 690-1527; or via Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the date and page
of this issue of the Federal Register.
Please be advised that the identity of the individual or entities
submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet via https://www.regulations.gov or https://www.ams.usda.gov/processedinspection. Any
comments received, regarding these proposed standards also will be
posted on these sites.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Myron Betts, Processed
Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Room 0709, So. Building; STOP 0247, Washington, DC 20250. Phone (202)
720-5021; Fax: (202) 690-1527. Copies of the proposed U.S. Standards
for Grades of Frozen Onions are available on the Internet at https://www.ams.usda.gov/processedinspection or https://www.regulations.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing
Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627), as amended, directs and authorizes
the Secretary of Agriculture ``to develop and improve standards of
quality, condition, quantity, grade and packaging and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to encourage uniformity and
consistency in commercial practices.''
AMS is committed to carrying out this authority in a manner that
facilitates the marketing of agricultural commodities and makes copies
of official standards available upon request. Those United States
standards for grades of processed fruits and vegetables no longer
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations but are maintained by USDA/
AMS/Fruit and Vegetable Programs at https://www.ams.usda.gov/processedinspection.
AMS is proposing to establish the U.S. Standards for Grades of
Frozen Onions using the procedures that appear in part 36, Title 7 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
Background
AMS received a petition from American Frozen Food Institute (AFFI),
requesting the development of new standards for frozen onions. The
petitioners represent almost all of the processors of frozen onions in
the United States. The petition provided information on style, sample
size, and product description to develop the standards.
AMS developed the grade standards for frozen onions to incorporate
comments from AFFI members, published notices on the proposed grade
standards in order to receive comments from interested parties (see 66
FR 21116, 68 FR 11801, 68 FR 27010) as appropriate and circulated
several discussion drafts between April 2007 and June 2010. AMS
received and evaluated samples of various styles of frozen onions to
collect information on how to ascertain the grade of frozen onions.
Comments from the trade association's members were used to further
develop the proposed standards. The comments referenced the style of
whole onions and questioned the specific size ranges for whole peeled
onions and the total allowance for peel in whole onions. Also the
comments suggested that stem material, sprout material, and root
material be included as major defects in the ``core material'' defect
category.
In addition, AMS met with members of AFFI at their annual meeting
in February 2007 to discuss the comments. AFFI suggested that dark
green units with dark green stripes across 50 percent or more of the
onion units would be considered a defect and under the style of whole
onion units greater than \3/8\ inch (10mm) or less than \3/4\
[[Page 31576]]
inch (20mm) be addressed. AFFI requested a change in the style
designations for minced style, and a correction to the text. The
members agreed with the proposed section concerning requirements for
Styles, Type I, Whole onions and Type II, Pearl onions. The members did
not agree with the proposed descriptions in requirements for whole
onions and pearl onions for Styles: Type I, whole onions of \3/4\ inch
to 1-7/8 inches in diameter and Type II, pearl onions of \1/4\ inch to
\7/8\ inch in diameter. Also, the members did not agree with the
proposed section concerning Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs) for
quality defects and submitted examples of specifications from buyers.
The members expressed concern because defects were defined by weight,
not by count. Larger units would be allowed a smaller number of defects
and smaller units would be allowed a large number of defects. The
members stated that the definitions of ``good appearance'' and
``reasonably good appearance'' were too similar.
AFFI recommended that the product description include a heat
treatment and suggested that AMS consider a requirement that onions be
blanched.
AFFI members requested that the product description be limited to
individually quick frozen onions. There were also concerns that
microbiological requirements, storage temperatures, shelf life
requirements, and limits for chemical and pesticide residues were not
addressed in the proposed frozen onion grade standards.
AMS incorporated these comments to make further changes to the
proposed grade standards in the discussion draft. However, in June 2010
AMS received additional feedback from AFFI members. These AFFI members
indicated that this and other frozen vegetable grade standards did not
include requirements for shelf-life, storage temperature,
microbiological, or chemical pesticide residue.
Nonetheless, commodities covered by U.S. grade standards must
comply with all of the regulatory food safety requirements of the Food
and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and
applicable state and local regulations.
The proposed standards for frozen onions would continue to use the
standard format for U.S. standards for grades using ``individual
attributes.'' Specifically, the standards would provide for the
``individual attribute'' procedure for product grading with sample
sizes, tolerances, and acceptance numbers of allowable defects with
single letter grade designation. Also, the standards would define the
term ``frozen onions'' and establish ``strips,'' ``diced,'' ``whole,''
``chopped,'' and ``other'' as the style designations. The proposal also
would define quality factors, AQLs, and tolerances for defects that
affect frozen onions and determine sample unit sizes for this
commodity. These grade standards would establish the grade levels
``A,'' ``B,'' and ``Substandard.'' The AQLs, tolerances, and acceptance
numbers for each quality factor as defined for each grade level would
also be established.
The grade of a sample unit of frozen onions would be ascertained
considering the factors of varietal characteristics, flavor and odor,
appearance, color, defects, absence of grit or dirt, and character.
These grade standards would provide a common language for trade, a
means of measuring value in the marketing of frozen onions, and provide
guidance in the effective utilization of frozen onions.
The official grade of a lot of frozen onions covered by these
standards would be determined by the procedures set forth in the
Regulations Governing Inspection and Certification of Processed
Products Thereof, and Certain Other Processed Foods Products (Sec.
52.1 to 52.83).
AMS is publishing this notice with a sixty-day comment period that
will provide a sufficient amount of time for interested persons to
comments on the proposed new standards for frozen onions.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
Dated: May 24, 2011.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-13501 Filed 5-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P