Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-516A), Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 30927-30928 [2011-13153]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology.
Dated: May 23, 2011.
Darrin A. King,
Director, Information Collection Clearance
Division, Privacy, Information and Records
Management Services, Office of Management.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Office of Planning, Evaluation and
Policy Development
Type of Review: New.
Title of Collection: Evaluation of the
Effectiveness of Online Learning
Courses for Secondary Students.
OMB Control Number: 1875–NEW.
Agency Form Number(s): N/A.
Frequency of Responses: Once.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 1,761.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 220.
Abstract: Given the considerable scale
at which online learning is being used
in schools today, it is particularly
important that policymakers have
research-based guidance available about
how best to deploy online learning
activities. However, few rigorous studies
have been completed that compare K–12
student achievement in online learning
to traditional, classroom-based
education. Similarly, while many
articles provide advice regarding the
‘‘best’’ ways to implement online
learning, few report an empirical basis
for recommended practices. To fill this
critical gap in knowledge, this study
will provide rigorous empirical data on
the effectiveness of online learning for
secondary students. This study will
conduct surveys of teachers and
students engaged in online learning
courses in two states: Florida and North
Carolina. Both states have large-scale,
statewide virtual school providers. In
Florida, the impact of a game-based,
online U.S. History course offered by
the Florida Virtual School (FLVS) on
student learning will be compared to a
traditional FLVS U.S. History online
course using an experimental design,
randomly assigning students to
conditions. Learning outcomes will be
assessed at the end of two topical
units—Civil Rights and the Industrial
Revolution. In North Carolina, the
impact of online learning for secondary
students enrolled in five different
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
courses offered by the North Carolina
Virtual Public School will be compared
with peers enrolled in similar courses in
face-to-face instruction. The North
Carolina study will use a quasiexperimental design using propensity
score matching. State end-of-course
exams for each course and the scores on
the Advanced Placement U.S. History
exam will be used as the primary
outcome measures. In addition to the
surveys of online teachers and students,
a sample of North Carolina teachers
teaching similar courses in face-to-face
instruction will be administered a
survey to collect information on
instructional practices in the
comparison face-to-face courses.
Copies of the proposed information
collection request may be accessed from
https://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the
‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and
by clicking on link number 4629. When
you access the information collection,
click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to
view. Written requests for information
should be addressed to U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection and OMB Control Number
when making your request.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
[FR Doc. 2011–13210 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. IC11–516A–000]
Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–516A), Proposed
Collection; Comment Request;
Extension
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) is
soliciting public comment on the
specific aspects of the information
collection described below.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30927
Comments in consideration of
the collection of information are due
July 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Commenters must send an
original of their comments to: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission,
Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Comments may be filed either on paper
or on CD/DVD, and should refer to
Docket No. IC11–516A–000. Documents
must be prepared in an acceptable filing
format and in compliance with
Commission submission guidelines at
https://www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. eFiling and eSubscription are
not available for Docket No. IC11–
516A–000, due to a system issue.
All comments and FERC issuances
may be viewed, printed or downloaded
remotely through FERC’s eLibrary at
https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
elibrary.asp, by searching on Docket No.
IC11–516A. For user assistance, contact
FERC Online Support by e-mail at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by phone
at: (866) 208–3676 (toll-free), or (202)
502–8659 for TTY.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at DataClearance@FERC.gov, telephone
at (202) 502–8663, and fax at (202) 273–
0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
information collected under the
requirements of FERC–516A, ‘‘Small
Generator Interconnection Agreements’’
(OMB No. 1902–2003), is used by the
Commission to enforce the statutory
provisions of sections 205 and 206 of
the Federal Power Act (FPA), as
amended by Title II, section 211 of the
Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978 (PURPA)(16 U.S.C. 825d). FPA
sections 205 and 206 require the
Commission to remedy undue
discriminatory practices within
interstate electric utility operations.
The Commission amended its
regulations in 2005 with Order No. 2006
to require public utilities that own,
control, or operate facilities used for the
transmission of electric energy in
interstate commerce to amend their
Open Access Transmission Tariffs
(OATTs) to include a Commissionapproved pro forma interconnection
procedures document and a standard
interconnection agreement for the
interconnection of generating facilities
having a capacity of no more than 20
MW (Small Generators).1
Prior to Order No. 2006, the
Commission’s policy had been to
DATES:
1 Standardization of Small Generator
Interconnection Agreements and Procedures, Order
No. 2006, 70 FR 34189 (May 12, 2005), FERC Stats.
& Regs. ¶ 31,180 (2005).
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
30928
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2011 / Notices
address interconnection issues on a
case-by-case basis. Although a number
of transmission providers had filed
interconnection procedures as part of
their OATTs, many industry
participants remained dissatisfied with
existing interconnection policies and
procedures. With an increasing number
of interconnection-related disputes, it
became apparent that the case-by-case
approach was an inadequate and
inefficient means to address
interconnection issues. This prompted
the Commission to adopt, in Order No.
2006, a single set of procedures for
jurisdictional transmission providers
and a single uniformly applicable
interconnection agreement for
transmission providers to use in
interconnecting with Small Generators.
With the incorporation of these
documents in their OATTs, there is no
longer a need for transmitting utilities to
file case-by-case interconnection
agreements and procedures with the
Commission. However, on occasion,
circumstances warrant non-conforming
agreements or a situation-specific set of
procedures. These non-conforming
documents must be filed in their
entirety with the Commission for review
and action.
The information collected is in
response to a mandatory requirement.
The Commission implements these
filing requirements in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR
part 35, 35.28(f).
Action: The Commission is requesting
a three-year extension of the current
expiration date, with no changes to the
existing collection of data.
Burden Statement: Public reporting
burden for this collection is estimated
as:
Number of respondents annually
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total annual
burden hours
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1) × (2) × (3)
1
1
1
25
238
1,000
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
238 (maintenance of documents) ................................................................................................
40 (filing of conforming agreements) ...........................................................................................
........................
........................
1,238
The estimated burden of the
continued requirement to maintain the
procedures and agreement documents in
transmission providers’ OATTs is
reflected herein as is the filing of nonconforming interconnection procedures
and agreements that occur on occasion.
The estimated total cost to respondents
is $84,739 (rounded). [1,238 hours
divided by 2,080 hours 2 per year, times
$142,372 3 equals $84,739]. The average
cost per respondent is $305 (rounded).
The reporting burden includes the
total time, effort, or financial resources
expended to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose, or provide the information
including: (1) Reviewing instructions;
(2) developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating,
verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information;
(3) adjusting the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; (4)
training personnel to respond to a
collection of information; (5) searching
data sources; (6) completing and
reviewing the collection of information;
and (7) transmitting, or otherwise
disclosing the information.
The estimate of cost for respondents
is based upon salaries for professional
and clerical support, as well as direct
and indirect overhead costs. Direct costs
include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as
administrative costs and the cost for
information technology. Indirect or
overhead costs are costs incurred by an
organization in support of its mission.
These costs apply to activities, which
benefit the whole organization rather
than any one particular function or
activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: May 20, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–13153 Filed 5–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
2 Number
of hours an employee works each year.
annual salary, benefits, and overhead
per employee.
3 Average
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 May 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. IC11–588–000]
Commision Information Collection
Activities (FERC–588), Proposed
Collection; Comment Request;
Extension
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of proposed information
collection and request for comments.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) is
soliciting public comment on the
specific aspects of the information
collection described below.
DATES: Comments in consideration of
the collection of information are due
July 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed
either electronically (eFiled) or in paper
format, and should refer to Docket No.
IC11–588–000. Documents must be
prepared in an acceptable filing format
and in compliance with Commission
submission guidelines at: https://
www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. eFiling instructions are
available at: https://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/efiling.asp. First time users must
follow eRegister instructions at: https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
eregistration.asp, to establish a
username and password before eFiling.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30927-30928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13153]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. IC11-516A-000]
Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-516A),
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3506(c)(2)(a)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the information collection described below.
DATES: Comments in consideration of the collection of information are
due July 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Commenters must send an original of their comments to:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments may be filed either
on paper or on CD/DVD, and should refer to Docket No. IC11-516A-000.
Documents must be prepared in an acceptable filing format and in
compliance with Commission submission guidelines at https://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. eFiling and eSubscription are
not available for Docket No. IC11-516A-000, due to a system issue.
All comments and FERC issuances may be viewed, printed or
downloaded remotely through FERC's eLibrary at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp, by searching on Docket No. IC11-516A. For
user assistance, contact FERC Online Support by e-mail at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by phone at: (866) 208-3676 (toll-free),
or (202) 502-8659 for TTY.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at DataClearance@FERC.gov, telephone at (202) 502-8663, and fax at
(202) 273-0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected under the
requirements of FERC-516A, ``Small Generator Interconnection
Agreements'' (OMB No. 1902-2003), is used by the Commission to enforce
the statutory provisions of sections 205 and 206 of the Federal Power
Act (FPA), as amended by Title II, section 211 of the Public Utility
Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA)(16 U.S.C. 825d). FPA sections
205 and 206 require the Commission to remedy undue discriminatory
practices within interstate electric utility operations.
The Commission amended its regulations in 2005 with Order No. 2006
to require public utilities that own, control, or operate facilities
used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce to
amend their Open Access Transmission Tariffs (OATTs) to include a
Commission-approved pro forma interconnection procedures document and a
standard interconnection agreement for the interconnection of
generating facilities having a capacity of no more than 20 MW (Small
Generators).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Standardization of Small Generator Interconnection
Agreements and Procedures, Order No. 2006, 70 FR 34189 (May 12,
2005), FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,180 (2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to Order No. 2006, the Commission's policy had been to
[[Page 30928]]
address interconnection issues on a case-by-case basis. Although a
number of transmission providers had filed interconnection procedures
as part of their OATTs, many industry participants remained
dissatisfied with existing interconnection policies and procedures.
With an increasing number of interconnection-related disputes, it
became apparent that the case-by-case approach was an inadequate and
inefficient means to address interconnection issues. This prompted the
Commission to adopt, in Order No. 2006, a single set of procedures for
jurisdictional transmission providers and a single uniformly applicable
interconnection agreement for transmission providers to use in
interconnecting with Small Generators.
With the incorporation of these documents in their OATTs, there is
no longer a need for transmitting utilities to file case-by-case
interconnection agreements and procedures with the Commission. However,
on occasion, circumstances warrant non-conforming agreements or a
situation-specific set of procedures. These non-conforming documents
must be filed in their entirety with the Commission for review and
action.
The information collected is in response to a mandatory
requirement. The Commission implements these filing requirements in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR part 35, 35.28(f).
Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current expiration date, with no changes to the existing collection of
data.
Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated as:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Number of respondents annually responses per hours per Total annual
respondent response burden hours
(1) (2) (3) (1) x (2) x
(3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
238 (maintenance of documents).................... 1 1 238
40 (filing of conforming agreements).............. 1 25 1,000
-------------------------------------------------------------
Totals........................................ .............. .............. 1,238
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The estimated burden of the continued requirement to maintain the
procedures and agreement documents in transmission providers' OATTs is
reflected herein as is the filing of non-conforming interconnection
procedures and agreements that occur on occasion. The estimated total
cost to respondents is $84,739 (rounded). [1,238 hours divided by 2,080
hours \2\ per year, times $142,372 \3\ equals $84,739]. The average
cost per respondent is $305 (rounded).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Number of hours an employee works each year.
\3\ Average annual salary, benefits, and overhead per employee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5)
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of
information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities, which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: May 20, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-13153 Filed 5-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P