Final Environmental Assessment and Mitigated Finding of No Significant Impact; Giant Miscanthus in Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, 30639-30641 [2011-13094]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
• Commodity Credit Corporation
• Farm Service Agency

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30639-30641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13094]



[[Page 30639]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Commodity Credit Corporation

Farm Service Agency


Final Environmental Assessment and Mitigated Finding of No 
Significant Impact; Giant Miscanthus in Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and 
Pennsylvania

AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation and Farm Service Agency, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; Mitigated Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the final environmental assessment (EA) 
that includes a mitigated finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for 
the proposed establishment and production of giant miscanthus 
(Miscanthus X giganteus) as a dedicated energy crop to be grown in the 
Aloterra Energy and MFA Oil Biomass Company (project sponsors) proposed 
project areas in Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania as part of 
the Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP). Based on comments received 
on the draft and in consultation with NRCS and ARS, FSA developed and 
included a finalized mitigation and monitoring plan as a part of the 
final EA.

ADDRESSES: For a copy of mitigated FONSI, which is in the final EA, by 
any following methods:
     Through the FSA home page at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=ecrc&topic=nep-cd;
     E-mail: rschneider@intenvsol.com, with the following 
subject line: ``Request for copy FONSI and final Giant Miscanthus EA'';
     Write to: Giant Miscanthus EA Copies, Integrated 
Environmental Solutions, LLC, 2150 S Central Expy, Ste 110, McKinney, 
TX 75070.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Ponish, (202) 720-6853. 
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for 
communication (braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact 
the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    The Aloterra Energy and MFA Oil Biomass Company submitted a 
proposal to the Farm Service Agency (FSA) to establish BCAP project 
areas in Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The proposal is to 
establish and produce giant miscanthus as a dedicated energy crop. FSA 
analyzed the potential environmental impacts of growing giant 
miscanthus in those areas in the final EA. FSA reviewed and considered 
all comments submitted on the draft EA in response to the notice 
published in the Federal Register on April 8, 2011 (76 FR 19741) and 
used additional inputs from the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
(NRCS) and the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in developing the 
final EA and the mitigation and monitoring plan as described in this 
notice. In the final EA, FSA has issued a mitigated FONSI on the 
proposal.
    The final EA and mitigation and monitoring plan for the proposed 
BCAP project areas supporting the establishment and production of Giant 
Miscanthus (Miscanthus X giganteus) in Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and 
Pennsylvania sponsored by Aloterra Energy LLC and MFA Oil Biomass LLC 
is now available.

Comments Received

    FSA received 54 comments on the draft EA from Federal agencies, 
State agencies, non-governmental organizations, and individuals. Of 
those comments, 37 commenters supported the proposal and 10 were 
against the proposal. In the comments, 280 issues were raised 
concerning many resource topics, National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA) requirements, and BCAP issues. Multiple commenters included air 
quality; biodiversity; invasiveness; land use changes; long-term 
monitoring and mitigation; mitigation measures; pests and diseases; 
seed sterility; species of concern and State-listed protected species; 
water quality; and water use. The comments were addressed and are 
included as an appendix to the Final EA.
    The comments, as well as consultation with NRCS and ARS, provided 
the basis for the mitigation measures and monitoring activities that 
will occur within each project area. More site-specific measures, which 
may be more stringent than the overall project area measures, depending 
upon the individual contract acreage and the project area, will be 
identified during the development of the individual producer's 
conservation plan, developed with the assistance of a qualified 
technical service provider.
    The Record of Decision for the Final BCAP Programmatic 
Environmental Impact Statement published in the Federal Register on 
October 27, 2010 (75 FR 65995-66007) is incorporated by reference in 
the EA. FSA considered the conditions specified in the record of 
decision and comments to the draft EA, as a result, FSA determined that 
it should do an EA to make a determination about whether there could be 
significant environmental impacts. The findings of the Final EA and 
mitigation and monitoring plan are summarized below.

Decision

    FSA, on behalf of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), has 
prepared an EA to evaluate the environmental consequences associated 
with establishing BCAP project areas that support the establishment and 
production of giant miscanthus (Miscanthus X giganteus) on 50,000 acres 
per proposed project area (200,000 acres total) by 2014. BCAP is a 
program authorized by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 
(Pub. L. 110-246, commonly referred to as the 2008 Farm Bill) that 
provides financial assistance to contract producers in approved project 
areas for the establishment and production of perennial bioenergy crops 
and annual bioenergy crops that show exceptional promise for producing 
bioenergy or biofuels that preserve natural resources and that are not 
primarily grown for food or animal feed.
    The purpose of the Proposed Action is to support the establishment 
and production of giant miscanthus as a crop for energy production to 
be grown by BCAP participants in the project areas proposed in 
Arkansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The need for the Proposed 
Action is to provide renewable biomass feedstock to a Biomass 
Conversion Facility (BCF) for use in energy production with and 
potentially outside the immediate region(s).

Proposed Action

    Aloterra Energy LLC and MFA Oil Biomass LLC (project sponsors) are 
proposing that FSA establishes BCAP project areas that support the 
establishment and production of giant miscanthus on 50,000 acres per 
proposed project area (200,000 total acres) by 2014, with crop 
longevity of 20 to 30 years. The acreage projected to be enrolled 
within the proposed project areas are marginal croplands and 
pastureland.
    The proposed project areas are located in four States in four 
distinct proposed project areas. Missouri contains two proposed project 
areas: Columbia and Aurora. Arkansas contains one proposed project 
area: Paragould. Ohio and Pennsylvania contain the final proposed 
project area: Ashtabula. Each proposed project area is named for the 
approximate location of the BCF that will be used to process the giant 
miscanthus biomass into pellets to be shipped to other location. Each 
proposed project area was developed at

[[Page 30640]]

an approximate 50-mile radius from the approximate BCAP location in 
that area.
    The establishment and production of giant miscanthus would begin 
with centralized propagation acres on each farm, which would be 
distributed to plantation acres during the next growing season. During 
the 2011 planting season, the initial establishment would require a 
centralized location within each proposed project area with center-
pivot irrigation due to the timing of planting and current climatic 
conditions occurring during the growing season. The centralized 
propagation area for the entire proposed project area would only occur 
for the 2011 planting season; all other planting seasons would follow 
the on-farm model with the initial establishment of propagation acres, 
followed by plantation acres the following growing season.
    Equipment to be used to establish giant miscanthus would be 
modified equipment from existing perennial grass industries. Equipment 
used to harvest and bale giant miscanthus would be similar to existing 
types of agricultural machinery used for hay crops; however, they would 
need to be more heavy-duty due to the increased biomass amounts being 
harvested and baled.

Reasons for Mitigated Finding of No Significant Impact

    In consideration of the analysis documented in the EA and the 
reasons outlined in the FONSI, the Proposed Action would not constitute 
a major Federal action that would significantly affect the human 
environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) will 
not be prepared. The determination is based on the following:
    1. The Proposed Action as outlined in the EA would provide minor 
beneficial effects to socioeconomics, soil resources, and water quality 
and quantity of the local areas due to diversified agricultural 
production, establishment of perennial vegetation on highly erodible 
soils, and estimated higher water use efficiency of the species to be 
established.
    2. The Proposed Action could result in minor negative effects from 
land use changes associated with marginal and idle croplands and 
pasturelands returning to agricultural production; vegetation 
composition on pasturelands, which in turn could alter wildlife 
habitat, and water quantity due to increased water use of the species 
when compared to annual species, such as traditional row crops. The 
potential negative effects would be minimized through the use of the 
mitigation and monitoring plan, described below and in the EA.
    3. The Proposed Action would require site specific environmental 
screening for each producer contract initiated with FSA for inclusion 
as a producer within the proposed project areas. The environmental 
screening would identify either the field level resources that would be 
needed to be avoided or the effects could be minimized through 
mitigation efforts as described in the EA.
    4. The potential beneficial and adverse impacts of implementing the 
Proposed Action have been fully considered within the EA. No 
significant adverse direct or indirect effects were identified, based 
on the resource analyses provided.
    5. The Proposed Action would not involve effects to the quality of 
the human environment that are likely to be highly controversial.
    6. The Proposed Action would not establish a precedent for future 
actions with significant effects and does not represent a decision in 
principle about a future consideration.
    7. The Proposed Action does not result in cumulative significant 
impacts when considered with other actions that also individually have 
insignificant impacts. Cumulative impacts of implementing the Proposed 
Action were determined to be not significant.
    8. The Proposed Action would not have adverse effects on threatened 
or endangered species or designated critical habitat since site 
specific analyses would be undertaken for each producer contract within 
each proposed BCAP project area to avoid adverse effects to the 
protected species.
    9. The Proposed Action does not threaten a violation of Federal, 
State, or local law or requirements imposed for the protection of the 
environment.

Overview of the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan

    To avoid more than minor adverse effects to the human and natural 
environment, a mitigation and monitoring plan was developed to address 
each of the resource areas analyzed in detail within the EA. One of the 
primary components of the mitigation and monitoring plan is producer 
education. The education component, to be held twice annually for 
active producers with an orientation program for new producers, 
outlines best practice standards across an array of resource areas and 
topics to ensure effective establishment and management of the giant 
miscanthus fields. In addition to the educational component, producers 
will be required to submit annual reports to the Project Sponsors 
detailing many aspects of production and allows for a greater 
understanding of how this species will grow in a production setting. 
More specifically, FSA, with cooperation from NRCS, ARS and the project 
sponsors, is proposing the following mitigation and monitoring 
measures. The following mitigation and monitoring measures have been 
developed based on the current literature and in some cases, 
conservative estimates relating to existing standards for other 
conservation programs and practices, but not specified to giant 
miscanthus.
     Biannual producer meetings to discuss new developments in 
production, management, pest and disease treatment, and eradication.
     New producer orientation to discuss production methods; 
management activities; potential for spread of giant miscanthus, 
treatment methods, and responsibilities; pest and disease 
identification, treatment methods, and responsibilities; eradication 
methods, if necessary; and reporting requirements.
     Producer Conservation Plans to include site specific best 
management practices (BMPs), which could include, but not be limited 
to, NRCS Conservation Practice Standards (CPS) for soil erosion, 
pesticide use and application, fertilizer use and application, and 
other relevant areas for each specific site.
     Setbacks and buffers to manage the giant miscanthus stand 
and to prevent unintentional spread of the giant miscanthus follow all 
local, state, or Federal regulations for containment of biomass 
plantings in the existence at the time of development of the producer's 
conservation plan or through an amendment of the conservation plan 
initiated by the producer and approved by FSA and NRCS, if determined 
appropriate for the site-specific conditions. If no such guidance 
exists, minimum procedures to prevent unintentional spread of giant 
miscanthus include the following:
     [cir] Establish or maintain a minimum 25 feet of setback or border 
around a giant miscanthus stand, unless the field is adjacent to 
existing cropland or actively managed pasture with the same operator.
     [cir] Setback or border areas may be planted to an annual row crop 
such as corn or soybeans; may be planted to a site-adapted, perennial 
cool-season or warm-season forage or turf grass; may be kept in 
existing vegetation; or kept clear by disking, rotovating, or treating 
with a non-selective burn down herbicide at least once a year. The 
method used may

[[Page 30641]]

be dependent on slope and the potential for erosion.
     Use only the sterile variety of giant miscanthus cultivar 
known as the ``Illinois Clone'' within the proposed project areas; all 
Illinois Clone cultivars must be approved for planting under Aloterra's 
membership through the Ohio Seed Improvement Association's Quality 
Assurance program.
     Initiate a seed sampling program to determine the on-going 
sterility of seeds produced from the acres within the project areas. 
The seed sampling program includes recommended actions specified in the 
mitigation and monitoring plan, including eradication, if a seed sample 
returns viable seed.
     Exclusion of planting giant miscanthus on certain acreage 
within the project areas, depending upon certain site-specific 
conditions specified in the mitigation and monitoring plan, like those 
lands subject to frequest flooding events.
     Develop monitoring program to identify:
    (1) Notify both United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and 
the project sponsors of any spread of giant miscanthus outside of 
planted fields as soon as possible after identification of the spread,
    (2) Notify the project sponsors of the identification of diseases 
and pests as soon as possible after identification and;
    (3) Include wildlife use or changes in use in the annual producer 
report specify all; a USDA representative will conduct an annual field 
visit to monitor the site and to look for potential spread of 
Miscanthus beyond the site and;
    (4) USDA will work with local weed control districts to provide 
additional monitoring and evaluation of the sites as appropriate.
     Annual producer reporting, to include land use tracking 
with the average and total size of enrolled fields; prior land use; 
rationale for land use change; spread of giant miscanthus outside of 
planted fields; any pests or diseases identification; the use of 
pesticides or herbicides to control unwanted spread of giant miscanthus 
or pests or diseases; BMP and CPS incorporated into field management, 
such as erosion control structures or materials, vegetative barriers, 
etc.; fertilizer usage and application methods; and cost data.

Determination

    In accordance with NEPA and FSA environmental regulations at 7 CFR 
part 799 that implemented the regulation of the Council on 
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), I find that the 
Proposed Action and associated mitigation measures do not constitute a 
major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment. Therefore, no environmental impact statement will be 
prepared.
    I make these findings and determination today, May 23, 2011, in 
Washington, DC, effective immediately. This notice will be published on 
our Web site and in the Federal Register.

    Signed: May 20, 2011.
Bruce Nelson,
Acting Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation, and 
Acting Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-13094 Filed 5-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P