Willamette Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Benton, Linn, Marion, and Polk Counties, OR, 30382-30384 [2011-12964]
Download as PDF
30382
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 25, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 2—SUMMARY OF 32 SPECIES IN CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA FOR WHICH 5-YEAR REVIEWS WERE COMPLETED
BETWEEN APRIL 1, 2010 AND MARCH 16, 2011—Continued
Common name
Recommendation
Scientific name
Lead Fish and
Wildlife Office
Contact
Bradd BaskervilleBridges (760)
431–9440.
Bradd BaskervilleBridges (760)
431–9440.
Josh Hull (916) 414–
6600.
Josh Hull (916) 414–
6600.
Connie Rutherford
(805) 644–1766.
Bradd BaskervilleBridges (760)
431–9440.
Bradd BaskervilleBridges (760)
431–9440.
Josh Hull (916) 414–
6600.
Josh Hull (916) 414–
6600.
Connie Rutherford
(805) 644–1766.
Josh Hull (916) 414–
6600.
San Diego button celery .............................
Eryngium aristulatum var.
parishii.
No status change ....
Carlsbad ..................
San Diego mesa mint .................................
Pogogyne abramsii ...............
No status change ....
Carlsbad ..................
San Joaquin woolly-threads .......................
No status change ....
Sacramento .............
No status change ....
Sacramento .............
Santa Cruz Island malacothrix ...................
Monolopia (=Lembertia)
congdonii.
Acanthomintha obovata ssp.
duttonii.
Malacothrix indecora .............
No status change ....
Ventura ....................
Slender-horned spineflower .......................
Dodecahema leptoceras .......
No status change ....
Carlsbad ..................
Slender-petaled mustard (thelypodium) .....
Thelypodium stenopetalum ...
No status change ....
Carlsbad ..................
Sonoma spineflower ...................................
Chorizanthe valida ................
No status change ....
Sacramento .............
Tiburon jewelflower ....................................
Streptanthus niger ................
No status change ....
Sacramento .............
Ventura marsh milk-vetch ..........................
Astragalus pycnostachyus
var. lanosi.
Pentachaeta bellidiflora ........
No status change ....
Ventura ....................
No status change ....
Sacramento .............
San Mateo thornmint ..................................
White-rayed pentachaeta ...........................
X. Authority
We publish this notice under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: May 18, 2011.
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–12861 Filed 5–24–11; 8:45 am]
public review and comment. The refuge
complex is made up of Ankeny, Baskett
Slough, and William L. Finley National
Wildlife Refuges (refuges), located in
Benton, Linn, Marion, and Polk
Counties, Oregon. In the DCCP and EA,
we describe and evaluate alternatives,
including our preferred alternative, for
managing the refuge complex for the 15
years following approval of the final
CCP.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 24, 2011.
Fish and Wildlife Service
ADDRESSES:
DATES:
[FWS–R1–R–2010–N125; 1265–0000–10137–
S3]
Willamette Valley National Wildlife
Refuge Complex, Benton, Linn, Marion,
and Polk Counties, OR
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan (DCCP) and
environmental assessment (EA) for the
Willamette Valley National Wildlife
Refuge Complex (refuge complex) for
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 May 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
You may submit comments,
requests for more information, or
requests for copies of the DCCP/EA, by
any of the following methods:
E-mail:
FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Willamette Valley NWRC
DCCP/EA’’ in the subject line.
Fax: Attn: Doug Spencer, Project
Leader, (541) 757–4450.
U.S. Mail: Doug Spencer, Project
Leader, Willamette Valley National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 26208 Finley
Refuge Road, Corvallis, OR 97333–9533.
Web site: https://www.fws.gov/
WillametteValley/complex/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Spencer, Project Leader, (541)
757–7236.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Introduction
The complex includes three refuges:
William L. Finley, Baskett Slough, and
Ankeny. Together, the three refuges
encompass approximately 11,110 acres
in western Oregon. Habitats on the
refuges include seasonal,
semipermanent, and permanent
wetlands; wet prairies, upland prairie/
oak savannas, oak woodlands, mixed
deciduous-coniferous forests, riparian,
and riverine and stream habitats.
Agricultural lands, the majority
managed as grass fields, are also present
on the refuges. The refuges were
established under the Migratory Bird
Conservation Act ‘‘for use as an inviolate
sanctuary or for any other management
purpose, for migratory birds . . . to
conserve and protect migratory birds
. . . and to restore or develop adequate
wildlife habitat’’ with emphasis on
protecting dusky Canada geese. In the
last four decades, these refuges have
provided not only an important
wintering grounds for the dusky and
thousands of other wintering geese and
ducks—but have been recognized more
recently as increasingly important areas
for conservation of the remaining
fragments of the native Valley habitats
and biota. The refuges support key
populations of federally listed species,
including Oregon chub, Fender’s blue
butterfly, Bradshaw’s desert-parsley,
Kincaid’s lupine, Nelson’s checker-
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 25, 2011 / Notices
mallow, and Willamette daisy, and
provide migration habitat for listed
Chinook salmon and steelhead. Several
other rare species are also found on the
refuges.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Refuge Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires us to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge.
The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Public Outreach
We began public outreach by
publishing a Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register (73 FR 11137; February
29, 2008), announcing our intent to
complete a CCP and EA and inviting
public comments. In January 2008, we
distributed Planning Update 1 to our
mailing list and public outlets. On
February 7 and 13, 2008, we held public
scoping meetings in Salem and
Corvallis, Oregon, respectively, to meet
the public and identify issues for
evaluation. The meetings were
announced through local media outlets,
on the refuges’ Web site, and in
Planning Update 1. In September 2008,
we distributed Planning Update 2,
which included a summary of the
comments we received, a planning
schedule, and a description of the CCP’s
scope. In September 2009, we
distributed Planning Update 3; in it we
summarized our preliminary draft
alternatives, and invited public
comments.
DCCP/EA Alternatives We Are
Considering
We identified and evaluated three
alternatives for managing the refuges,
including a No Action Alternative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 May 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
(Alternative 1). Brief descriptions of the
alternatives follow:
Alternative 1 (No Action)
Under Alternative 1, the refuges
would continue to maintain cultivated
grass fields under a cooperative farming
program to provide forage for wintering
Canada geese. Other goose management
activities, such as managing wetland
habitats and providing sanctuary, would
continue. The refuges would also
continue to manage and enhance native
habitats but no further habitat
restoration work would occur.
Endangered species management would
continue. Existing public uses would
continue with the current facilities and
programs in place. No new public use
facilities would be developed. The
current areas closed to public access
would remain in effect to provide
sanctuary during the wintering
waterfowl season. The refuges would
not pursue any additional land
protection measures under the no
change alternative.
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Under Alternative 2, an emphasis on
providing habitat for wintering geese
would remain. Forage would continue
to be provided primarily via cooperative
farming. The refuges would pursue
measures to help retain the services of
cooperative farmers, such as providing
enhanced irrigation capabilities;
providing additional lure crops such as
corn or other grains; the refuges taking
over farming on certain high goose use
fields; the Service offsetting a portion of
the costs to cooperative farmers, etc.
Wetland habitat management and
restoration would also be intensified to
improve habitat for geese and other
wildlife.
Management and enhancement would
continue in remnant native habitats and
recently restored areas. In addition,
approximately 479 additional acres on
the three refuges would be restored to
wetland, wet prairie, riparian, or upland
prairie/oak savannah habitats over the
next 15 years.
Threatened and endangered species
management would continue to be a
priority, guided by recovery plans
where applicable. Existing populations
of several threatened and endangered
species would be strengthened, and
several new populations would be
established on the refuges.
Wildlife observation and
interpretation would continue to be
emphasized as the cornerstone of the
public use program. Several new trails
and observation facilities would be
added. Additional interpretive signs and
materials, including on-line materials,
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30383
would be developed. Major special
events would occur at a frequency of
about 3–4 per year, and monthly
weekend interpretive programs would
be developed.
Environmental education efforts
would be expanded with an objective of
reaching more students and schools,
particularly at William L. Finley Refuge.
Outdoor class shelters would be added.
Funding would be sought to construct
an Environmental Education Center,
including indoor classroom facilities
and a small exhibit area.
A new option to hunt antlerless deer
would be added. In addition, new
upland locations would be available for
hunting during a portion of the shotgun
season; this will require closure of two
hiking trails for a week in November.
The shotgun season would be shortened
and shifted to later in the State season.
A youth waterfowl hunt and a
September goose hunt would be
provided at Baskett Slough Refuge.
Fishing would be promoted at the
Willamette River by providing a canoe
launch at Snag Boat Bend. The current
area closed to public access would
remain in effect to provide sanctuary
during the wintering waterfowl season.
Together with Oregon Department of
Fish and Wildlife, the refuges would
develop an elk management plan after
completion of the CCP. The refuges
would continue to expand conservation
partnerships, volunteer programs, and
outreach to local communities.
Proactive cultural resource management
would occur by repairing/maintaining
the historic structures on William L.
Finley Refuge and by adding associated
interpretive facilities.
This alternative also proposes
protection, conservation, and
management of additional lands within
the Willamette Valley that could
contribute to the refuges’ purposes and
goals by providing wintering habitat and
forage for Canada geese; providing
protection, enhancement, and
restoration of native habitats and rare
Willamette Valley species; and
providing opportunity for additional
wildlife-dependent public use. The
refuges would undertake a subsequent
land protection planning process to
identify specific tracts of lands for these
purposes.
Alternative 3
This alternative involves a major shift
in management for wintering Canada
geese. Forage would be provided either
through contract farming (paying
farmers to grow crops on the refuges)
and/or force account farming (refuge
staff doing the farming). The refuges
would only farm fields that have been
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
30384
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 25, 2011 / Notices
receiving moderate to high goose use.
Refuge farming program costs would
increase and goose use would likely
decrease.
This alternative would create the
opportunity to restore approximately
1,436 acres of cropland to native habitat
since the amount of farmland would be
reduced. However, the fields to be
restored would likely lie fallow and
could become weedy while awaiting
staff time and funding for restoration.
Wildlife observation and
interpretation would continue to be
emphasized as the cornerstone of the
public use program, but this alternative
does little to expand these programs
further. Interpretive signs would be
developed or updated for existing
facilities where needed, but major new
developments and new interpretive
methods would generally not occur.
One or two special events would be
held each year. The current area closed
to public access on all three refuges
would remain in effect to provide
sanctuary during the wintering
waterfowl season.
Deer hunting, threatened and
endangered species management,
environmental education, fishing, elk
management, cultural resources,
subsequent land protection planning,
and conservation partnership activity
would occur as under Alternative 2.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Public Availability of Documents
In addition to the information in
ADDRESSES, you can view or obtain
documents in the following ways: by
calling the refuge complex at (541) 757–
7236 or visiting our Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/WillametteValley/finley/
refuge_planning.html. Printed copies
will be available for review at the
following libraries:
• Corvallis-Benton County Public
Library, 645 NW. Monroe Avenue,
Corvallis, OR 97330, 541–766–6926.
• Albany Public Library, 2450 14th
Avenue SE., Albany, OR 97231, 541–
917–7580.
• Dallas Public Library, 950 Main
Street, Dallas, OR 97338, 503–623–2633.
• Jefferson Public Library, 128 South
Main Street, Jefferson, OR 97352, 541–
327–3826.
Next Steps
After this comment period ends, we
will analyze the comments and address
them in the final CCP and decision
document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 May 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
become publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your identifying
information from the public, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Dated: April 28, 2011.
Robyn Thorson,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011–12964 Filed 5–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2011–N096; 30120–1112–000–
F2]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for a
Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan
and Incidental Take Permit
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), advise the
public that we intend to prepare a draft
environmental impact statement (EIS) to
evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives relating to the proposed
issuance of an Endangered Species Act
Permit to Fowler Ridge Wind Farm LLC,
Fowler Ridge Wind Farm II LLC, Fowler
Ridge Wind Farm III LLC, and Fowler
Ridge Wind Farm IV LLC (Applicant)
for incidental take of the Indiana bat
(Myotis sodalis), a Federal endangered
species, from activities associated with
the operation of Fowler Ridge Wind
Farm in Benton County, Indiana. We
also announce a public comment
period.
DATES: The public scoping period begins
with publication of this notice in the
Federal Register and will continue
through June 23, 2011. The Service will
consider all comments defining the
scope of the EIS that are received or
postmarked by this date. Comments
received or postmarked after this date
will be considered to the extent
practicable. The Service will conduct a
public scoping meeting in Fowler, IN,
on June 7, 2011. The scoping meeting
will provide the public with an
opportunity to present comments, ask
questions, and discuss issues with
Service staff regarding the EIS.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to Mr.
Scott Pruitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 621 South Walker St.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bloomington, Indiana, 47403; electronic
mail: FowlerRidgeHCP@fws.gov; or fax:
(812) 334–4273 (Attention: Scott Pruitt).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Scott Pruitt at (812) 334–4261.
Individuals who are hearing-impaired or
speech-impaired may call the Federal
Relay Service at (800) 877–8337 for TTY
assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
publish this notice in compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), and its implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1501.7, 1506.6, and
1508.22), and Section 10(c) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (the
Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1539(c)).
We intend to gather the information
necessary to determine impacts and
alternatives to support a decision
regarding the potential issuance of an
incidental take permit to the Applicant,
and the implementation of the
supporting draft habitat conservation
plan (HCP). We intend to prepare an EIS
to evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives relating to the proposed
issuance of an incidental take permit
(ITP) under the Act. The applicant
proposes to apply for an incidental take
permit through development and
implementation of an HCP. The
proposed HCP will cover take of the
Indiana bat that is incidental to
activities associated with the operation
of Fowler Ridge Wind Farm, and will
include measures necessary to minimize
and mitigate impacts to the Indiana bat
and its habitat to the maximum extent
practicable.
Request for Information
The Service requests data, comments,
new information, or suggestions from
the public, other concerned
governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any
other interested party on this notice.
These comments will be considered in
the development of a draft EIS, in the
development of a draft HCP by the
applicant, and in the determination of
whether to issue an ITP. We particularly
seek comments concerning:
(1) Biological information concerning
the Indiana bat;
(2) Relevant data concerning wind
power and bat interactions;
(3) Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, population size,
and population trends of the Indiana
bat;
(4) Current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts
on the Indiana bat;
(5) Any information identified in the
aforementioned as it relates to other bat
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30382-30384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12964]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2010-N125; 1265-0000-10137-S3]
Willamette Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Benton, Linn,
Marion, and Polk Counties, OR
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (DCCP) and
environmental assessment (EA) for the Willamette Valley National
Wildlife Refuge Complex (refuge complex) for public review and comment.
The refuge complex is made up of Ankeny, Baskett Slough, and William L.
Finley National Wildlife Refuges (refuges), located in Benton, Linn,
Marion, and Polk Counties, Oregon. In the DCCP and EA, we describe and
evaluate alternatives, including our preferred alternative, for
managing the refuge complex for the 15 years following approval of the
final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by June 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, requests for more information, or
requests for copies of the DCCP/EA, by any of the following methods:
E-mail: FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov. Include ``Willamette Valley
NWRC DCCP/EA'' in the subject line.
Fax: Attn: Doug Spencer, Project Leader, (541) 757-4450.
U.S. Mail: Doug Spencer, Project Leader, Willamette Valley National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 26208 Finley Refuge Road, Corvallis, OR 97333-
9533.
Web site: https://www.fws.gov/WillametteValley/complex/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Spencer, Project Leader, (541)
757-7236.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The complex includes three refuges: William L. Finley, Baskett
Slough, and Ankeny. Together, the three refuges encompass approximately
11,110 acres in western Oregon. Habitats on the refuges include
seasonal, semipermanent, and permanent wetlands; wet prairies, upland
prairie/oak savannas, oak woodlands, mixed deciduous-coniferous
forests, riparian, and riverine and stream habitats. Agricultural
lands, the majority managed as grass fields, are also present on the
refuges. The refuges were established under the Migratory Bird
Conservation Act ``for use as an inviolate sanctuary or for any other
management purpose, for migratory birds . . . to conserve and protect
migratory birds . . . and to restore or develop adequate wildlife
habitat'' with emphasis on protecting dusky Canada geese. In the last
four decades, these refuges have provided not only an important
wintering grounds for the dusky and thousands of other wintering geese
and ducks--but have been recognized more recently as increasingly
important areas for conservation of the remaining fragments of the
native Valley habitats and biota. The refuges support key populations
of federally listed species, including Oregon chub, Fender's blue
butterfly, Bradshaw's desert-parsley, Kincaid's lupine, Nelson's
checker-
[[Page 30383]]
mallow, and Willamette daisy, and provide migration habitat for listed
Chinook salmon and steelhead. Several other rare species are also found
on the refuges.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of
fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Refuge Administration Act.
Public Outreach
We began public outreach by publishing a Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register (73 FR 11137; February 29, 2008), announcing our
intent to complete a CCP and EA and inviting public comments. In
January 2008, we distributed Planning Update 1 to our mailing list and
public outlets. On February 7 and 13, 2008, we held public scoping
meetings in Salem and Corvallis, Oregon, respectively, to meet the
public and identify issues for evaluation. The meetings were announced
through local media outlets, on the refuges' Web site, and in Planning
Update 1. In September 2008, we distributed Planning Update 2, which
included a summary of the comments we received, a planning schedule,
and a description of the CCP's scope. In September 2009, we distributed
Planning Update 3; in it we summarized our preliminary draft
alternatives, and invited public comments.
DCCP/EA Alternatives We Are Considering
We identified and evaluated three alternatives for managing the
refuges, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1). Brief
descriptions of the alternatives follow:
Alternative 1 (No Action)
Under Alternative 1, the refuges would continue to maintain
cultivated grass fields under a cooperative farming program to provide
forage for wintering Canada geese. Other goose management activities,
such as managing wetland habitats and providing sanctuary, would
continue. The refuges would also continue to manage and enhance native
habitats but no further habitat restoration work would occur.
Endangered species management would continue. Existing public uses
would continue with the current facilities and programs in place. No
new public use facilities would be developed. The current areas closed
to public access would remain in effect to provide sanctuary during the
wintering waterfowl season. The refuges would not pursue any additional
land protection measures under the no change alternative.
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Under Alternative 2, an emphasis on providing habitat for wintering
geese would remain. Forage would continue to be provided primarily via
cooperative farming. The refuges would pursue measures to help retain
the services of cooperative farmers, such as providing enhanced
irrigation capabilities; providing additional lure crops such as corn
or other grains; the refuges taking over farming on certain high goose
use fields; the Service offsetting a portion of the costs to
cooperative farmers, etc. Wetland habitat management and restoration
would also be intensified to improve habitat for geese and other
wildlife.
Management and enhancement would continue in remnant native
habitats and recently restored areas. In addition, approximately 479
additional acres on the three refuges would be restored to wetland, wet
prairie, riparian, or upland prairie/oak savannah habitats over the
next 15 years.
Threatened and endangered species management would continue to be a
priority, guided by recovery plans where applicable. Existing
populations of several threatened and endangered species would be
strengthened, and several new populations would be established on the
refuges.
Wildlife observation and interpretation would continue to be
emphasized as the cornerstone of the public use program. Several new
trails and observation facilities would be added. Additional
interpretive signs and materials, including on-line materials, would be
developed. Major special events would occur at a frequency of about 3-4
per year, and monthly weekend interpretive programs would be developed.
Environmental education efforts would be expanded with an objective
of reaching more students and schools, particularly at William L.
Finley Refuge. Outdoor class shelters would be added. Funding would be
sought to construct an Environmental Education Center, including indoor
classroom facilities and a small exhibit area.
A new option to hunt antlerless deer would be added. In addition,
new upland locations would be available for hunting during a portion of
the shotgun season; this will require closure of two hiking trails for
a week in November. The shotgun season would be shortened and shifted
to later in the State season. A youth waterfowl hunt and a September
goose hunt would be provided at Baskett Slough Refuge. Fishing would be
promoted at the Willamette River by providing a canoe launch at Snag
Boat Bend. The current area closed to public access would remain in
effect to provide sanctuary during the wintering waterfowl season.
Together with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the refuges
would develop an elk management plan after completion of the CCP. The
refuges would continue to expand conservation partnerships, volunteer
programs, and outreach to local communities. Proactive cultural
resource management would occur by repairing/maintaining the historic
structures on William L. Finley Refuge and by adding associated
interpretive facilities.
This alternative also proposes protection, conservation, and
management of additional lands within the Willamette Valley that could
contribute to the refuges' purposes and goals by providing wintering
habitat and forage for Canada geese; providing protection, enhancement,
and restoration of native habitats and rare Willamette Valley species;
and providing opportunity for additional wildlife-dependent public use.
The refuges would undertake a subsequent land protection planning
process to identify specific tracts of lands for these purposes.
Alternative 3
This alternative involves a major shift in management for wintering
Canada geese. Forage would be provided either through contract farming
(paying farmers to grow crops on the refuges) and/or force account
farming (refuge staff doing the farming). The refuges would only farm
fields that have been
[[Page 30384]]
receiving moderate to high goose use. Refuge farming program costs
would increase and goose use would likely decrease.
This alternative would create the opportunity to restore
approximately 1,436 acres of cropland to native habitat since the
amount of farmland would be reduced. However, the fields to be restored
would likely lie fallow and could become weedy while awaiting staff
time and funding for restoration.
Wildlife observation and interpretation would continue to be
emphasized as the cornerstone of the public use program, but this
alternative does little to expand these programs further. Interpretive
signs would be developed or updated for existing facilities where
needed, but major new developments and new interpretive methods would
generally not occur. One or two special events would be held each year.
The current area closed to public access on all three refuges would
remain in effect to provide sanctuary during the wintering waterfowl
season.
Deer hunting, threatened and endangered species management,
environmental education, fishing, elk management, cultural resources,
subsequent land protection planning, and conservation partnership
activity would occur as under Alternative 2.
Public Availability of Documents
In addition to the information in ADDRESSES, you can view or obtain
documents in the following ways: by calling the refuge complex at (541)
757-7236 or visiting our Web site at https://www.fws.gov/WillametteValley/finley/refuge_planning.html. Printed copies will be
available for review at the following libraries:
Corvallis-Benton County Public Library, 645 NW. Monroe
Avenue, Corvallis, OR 97330, 541-766-6926.
Albany Public Library, 2450 14th Avenue SE., Albany, OR
97231, 541-917-7580.
Dallas Public Library, 950 Main Street, Dallas, OR 97338,
503-623-2633.
Jefferson Public Library, 128 South Main Street,
Jefferson, OR 97352, 541-327-3826.
Next Steps
After this comment period ends, we will analyze the comments and
address them in the final CCP and decision document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may become publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your identifying information from
the public, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Dated: April 28, 2011.
Robyn Thorson,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011-12964 Filed 5-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P