Land Disposal Restrictions: Site-Specific Treatment Variance for Hazardous Selenium-Bearing Waste Treated by U.S. Ecology Nevada in Beatty, NV and Withdrawal of Site-Specific Treatment Variance for Hazardous Selenium-Bearing Waste Treatment Issued to Chemical Waste Management in Kettleman Hills, CA, 30027 [2011-12783]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rules, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Parties with objections to this direct
final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the Proposed Rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: April 25, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(378)(i)(B) and (C)
to read as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(378) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Placer County Air Pollution
Control District.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 May 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
(1) Rule 245, ‘‘Surface Coating of
Metal Parts and Products,’’ amended on
August 20, 2009.
(C) Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Rule 74.12, ‘‘Surface Coating of
Metal Parts and Products,’’ adopted on
April 8, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–12611 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 268
[EPA–HQ–RCRA–2010–0851; FRL–9310–2]
Land Disposal Restrictions: SiteSpecific Treatment Variance for
Hazardous Selenium-Bearing Waste
Treated by U.S. Ecology Nevada in
Beatty, NV and Withdrawal of SiteSpecific Treatment Variance for
Hazardous Selenium-Bearing Waste
Treatment Issued to Chemical Waste
Management in Kettleman Hills, CA
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule.
AGENCY:
Because EPA received
adverse comment, we are withdrawing
the Direct Final rule that granted a sitespecific treatment variance to U.S.
Ecology Nevada in Beatty, Nevada and
withdrew an existing site-specific
treatment variance issued to Chemical
Waste Management, Inc. in Kettleman
Hills, California. The Direct Final rule
pertains to the treatment of a hazardous
waste generated by the OwensBrockway Glass Container Company in
Vernon, California that is unable to meet
the concentration-based treatment
standard for selenium established under
the Land Disposal Restrictions program.
EPA also issued a parallel proposal to be
used as the basis for the final action in
the event that EPA received any adverse
comments on the Direct Final rule.
DATES: Effective May 24, 2011, EPA
withdraws the Direct Final rule
published at 76 FR 18921 on April 6,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
more information, contact Jesse Miller,
Materials Recovery and Waste
Management Division, Office of
Resource Conservation and Recovery
(MC 5304 P), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone (703) 308–1180; fax (703)
308–0522; or miller.jesse@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because
EPA received adverse comment, we are
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30027
withdrawing the Direct Final rule that
amended the Land Disposal Restrictions
treatment standards (40 CFR part
268.44(o)) by granting a site-specific
treatment variance to U.S. Ecology
Nevada in Beatty, Nevada and
withdrawing an existing site-specific
treatment variance issued to Chemical
Waste Management, Inc. in Kettleman
Hills, California, published on April 6,
2011 at 76 FR 18921. We stated in that
Direct Final rule that if we received
adverse comment by May 6, 2011, the
Direct Final rule would not take effect
and we would publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register. We
subsequently received adverse comment
on that Direct Final rule. We will
address those comments in any
subsequent final action, which will be
based on the parallel proposed rule also
published on April 6, 2011 at 76 FR
18921. As stated in the Direct Final rule
and the parallel proposed rule, we will
not institute a second comment period
on this action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 268
Environmental protection, Hazardous
waste, and Variances.
Dated: May 17, 2011.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
Accordingly, the amendments to the
rule published on April 6, 2011 (76 FR
18921) are withdrawn as of May 24,
2011.
[FR Doc. 2011–12783 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002; FRL–9310–8]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 8 is publishing a
direct final Notice of Partial Deletion of
the remaining portions of Operable Unit
9 (OU9), the Residential Populated
Areas, of the California Gulch
Superfund Site (Site), located in Lake
County, Colorado, from the National
Priorities List (NPL). The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12783]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 268
[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2010-0851; FRL-9310-2]
Land Disposal Restrictions: Site-Specific Treatment Variance for
Hazardous Selenium-Bearing Waste Treated by U.S. Ecology Nevada in
Beatty, NV and Withdrawal of Site-Specific Treatment Variance for
Hazardous Selenium-Bearing Waste Treatment Issued to Chemical Waste
Management in Kettleman Hills, CA
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Because EPA received adverse comment, we are withdrawing the
Direct Final rule that granted a site-specific treatment variance to
U.S. Ecology Nevada in Beatty, Nevada and withdrew an existing site-
specific treatment variance issued to Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
in Kettleman Hills, California. The Direct Final rule pertains to the
treatment of a hazardous waste generated by the Owens-Brockway Glass
Container Company in Vernon, California that is unable to meet the
concentration-based treatment standard for selenium established under
the Land Disposal Restrictions program. EPA also issued a parallel
proposal to be used as the basis for the final action in the event that
EPA received any adverse comments on the Direct Final rule.
DATES: Effective May 24, 2011, EPA withdraws the Direct Final rule
published at 76 FR 18921 on April 6, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information, contact Jesse
Miller, Materials Recovery and Waste Management Division, Office of
Resource Conservation and Recovery (MC 5304 P), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone (703) 308-1180; fax (703) 308-0522; or miller.jesse@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because EPA received adverse comment, we are
withdrawing the Direct Final rule that amended the Land Disposal
Restrictions treatment standards (40 CFR part 268.44(o)) by granting a
site-specific treatment variance to U.S. Ecology Nevada in Beatty,
Nevada and withdrawing an existing site-specific treatment variance
issued to Chemical Waste Management, Inc. in Kettleman Hills,
California, published on April 6, 2011 at 76 FR 18921. We stated in
that Direct Final rule that if we received adverse comment by May 6,
2011, the Direct Final rule would not take effect and we would publish
a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register. We subsequently received
adverse comment on that Direct Final rule. We will address those
comments in any subsequent final action, which will be based on the
parallel proposed rule also published on April 6, 2011 at 76 FR 18921.
As stated in the Direct Final rule and the parallel proposed rule, we
will not institute a second comment period on this action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 268
Environmental protection, Hazardous waste, and Variances.
Dated: May 17, 2011.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
Accordingly, the amendments to the rule published on April 6, 2011
(76 FR 18921) are withdrawn as of May 24, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2011-12783 Filed 5-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P