Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Libya, 30001-30002 [2011-12621]
Download as PDF
30001
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Country
License
requirement
Entity
License review policy
—Vserossiyskiy
Nauchno-Issledovatelskiy
Institut Eksperimentalnoy Fiziki;
Federal Register
citation
***76 FR [INSERT FR
PAGE NUMBER], 5/
24/11.
—Russian Federal Nuclear Center-VNIIEF
(RFNC–VNIIEF);
—Institute of Experimental Physics;
—ARIEP (All Russian Institute for Experimental
Physics);
—Khariton Institute;
—Sarov Nuclear Weapons Plant;
—Avangard Electromechanical Plant;
—Federal State Unitary Enterprise Russian
Federal Nuclear Center—All Russian Scientific
Research Institute of Experimental Physics
(FGUPRFNCs VNIIEF)
—Arzamas-16, (Address: 37 Mira Ave. Sarov,
Nizhny Novgorod Region, 607188 Russia); and
any nuclear-related entities, institutes or centers
located in Sarov (Kremlev)
*
*
*
Dated: May 19, 2011.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–12803 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 126
RIN 1400–AC83
[Public Notice 7466]
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Libya
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State is
amending the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) to update the
policy regarding Libya to reflect the
United Nations Security Council arms
embargoes adopted in February and
March.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: This rule is
effective May 24, 2011.
DATES:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Memos, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Policy, Department of
State, by telephone: (202) 663–2804; fax:
(202) 261–8199; or e-mail:
memosni@state.gov. Attn: Part 126,
Libya.
On
February 26, 2011, the United Nations
Security Council adopted Resolution
1970, paragraph 9 of which provides
that U.N. member states shall
immediately take the necessary
measures to prevent the sale, supply or
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 May 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
*
*
*
*
transfer of arms and related materiel of
all types to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya,
with certain exceptions. Additionally,
on March 17, 2011, the U.N. Security
Council adopted Resolution 1973,
paragraph 4 of which authorizes
member states to take all necessary
measures, notwithstanding the arms
embargo established by paragraph 9 of
Resolution 1970, to protect civilians and
civilian populated areas under threat of
attack in Libya. This rulemaking
implements the Security Council’s
actions within the ITAR by adding
Libya to § 126.1(c) and revising the
previous policy on Libya contained in
§ 126.1(k) to announce a policy of denial
for all requests for licenses or other
approvals to export or otherwise transfer
defense articles and services to Libya,
except where not prohibited under
UNSC embargo and determined to be in
the interests of the national security and
foreign policy of the United States.
and public procedure on this rule would
be impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest. See 5
U.S.C. 808(2).
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Executive Order 13175
The Department has determined that
this rule will not have tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply to this rule.
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from § 553 (Rulemaking) and § 554
(Adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act. Since this rule is exempt
from 5 U.S.C. 553, it is the view of the
Department of State that the provisions
of § 553(d) do not apply to this
rulemaking. Therefore, this rule is
effective upon publication. The
Department also finds that, given the
national security issues surrounding
U.S. policy towards Libya, that notice
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this amendment is not subject
to the notice-and-comment procedures
of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not require
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This amendment does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This amendment has been found not
to be a major rule within the meaning
of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This amendment will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
30002
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this amendment
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this amendment.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department of State does not
consider this rule to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory
Planning and Review. The Department
is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles
and services is a foreign affairs function
of the United States Government and
that rules governing the conduct of this
function are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Because this rulemaking concerns a
foreign affairs function of the United
States, the Department of State has
determined that public participation in
this rulemaking under Section 2 of
Executive Order 13563 is not required.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
the amendment in light of sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, part 126, is amended as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
PART 126—GENERAL POLICIES AND
PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub.
L. 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2780, 2791 and 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p.79; 22 U.S.C.
2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR
28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.899; Sec. 1225,
Pub. L. 108–375.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 May 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
2. Section 126.1 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c) and (k) to read
as follows:
■
§ 126.1 Prohibited exports and sales to
certain countries.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Exports and sales prohibited by
United Nations Security Council
embargoes. Whenever the United
Nations Security Council mandates an
arms embargo, all transactions that are
prohibited by the embargo and that
involve U.S. persons (see § 120.15 of
this chapter) anywhere, or any person in
the United States, and defense articles
or services of a type enumerated on the
United States Munitions List (22 CFR
part 121), irrespective of origin, are
prohibited under the ITAR for the
duration of the embargo, unless the
Department of State publishes a notice
in the Federal Register specifying
different measures. This would include,
but is not limited to, transactions
involving trade by U.S. persons who are
located inside or outside of the United
States in defense articles or services of
U.S. or foreign origin that are located
inside or outside of the United States.
United Nations Arms Embargoes
include, but are not necessarily limited
to, the following countries:
(1) Cote d’Ivoire.
(2) Democratic Republic of Congo (see
also paragraph (i) of this section).
(3) Iraq.
(4) Iran.
(5) Lebanon.
(6) Liberia.
(7) Libya (see also paragraph (k) of
this section).
(8) North Korea.
(9) Sierra Leone.
(10) Somalia.
(11) Sudan.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Libya. It is the policy of the United
States to deny licenses or other
approvals for exports or imports of
defense articles and defense services
destined for or originating in Libya,
except where it determines, upon caseby-case review, that the transaction (or
activity) is not prohibited under
applicable U.N. Security Council
resolutions and that the transaction (or
activity) is in furtherance of the national
security and foreign policy of the United
States.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 17, 2011.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–12621 Filed 5–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2010–0005; T.D. TTB–93;
Ref: Notice No. 108]
RIN 1513–AB55
Establishment of the Antelope Valley
of the California High Desert
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
This Treasury decision
establishes the 665-square mile
‘‘Antelope Valley of the California High
Desert’’ American viticultural area in
Los Angeles and Kern Counties,
California. The Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: Effective Date: June 23, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elisabeth C. Kann, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G St., NW.,
Room 200E, Washington, DC 20220;
phone 202–453–2002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
requires that these regulations, among
other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the regulations
promulgated under the FAA Act.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) allows the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the
list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
E:\FR\FM\24MYR1.SGM
24MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30001-30002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12621]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 126
RIN 1400-AC83
[Public Notice 7466]
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Libya
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is amending the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to update the policy regarding Libya to
reflect the United Nations Security Council arms embargoes adopted in
February and March.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective May 24, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Memos, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, by telephone: (202) 663-
2804; fax: (202) 261-8199; or e-mail: memosni@state.gov. Attn: Part
126, Libya.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 26, 2011, the United Nations
Security Council adopted Resolution 1970, paragraph 9 of which provides
that U.N. member states shall immediately take the necessary measures
to prevent the sale, supply or transfer of arms and related materiel of
all types to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, with certain exceptions.
Additionally, on March 17, 2011, the U.N. Security Council adopted
Resolution 1973, paragraph 4 of which authorizes member states to take
all necessary measures, notwithstanding the arms embargo established by
paragraph 9 of Resolution 1970, to protect civilians and civilian
populated areas under threat of attack in Libya. This rulemaking
implements the Security Council's actions within the ITAR by adding
Libya to Sec. 126.1(c) and revising the previous policy on Libya
contained in Sec. 126.1(k) to announce a policy of denial for all
requests for licenses or other approvals to export or otherwise
transfer defense articles and services to Libya, except where not
prohibited under UNSC embargo and determined to be in the interests of
the national security and foreign policy of the United States.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States Government and that rules implementing
this function are exempt from Sec. 553 (Rulemaking) and Sec. 554
(Adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act. Since this rule is
exempt from 5 U.S.C. 553, it is the view of the Department of State
that the provisions of Sec. 553(d) do not apply to this rulemaking.
Therefore, this rule is effective upon publication. The Department also
finds that, given the national security issues surrounding U.S. policy
towards Libya, that notice and public procedure on this rule would be
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. See 5
U.S.C. 808(2).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this amendment is not subject to the notice-and-comment
procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not require analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This amendment does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13175
The Department has determined that this rule will not have tribal
implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Section 5 of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rule.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This amendment has been found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This amendment will not have substantial direct effects on the
States,
[[Page 30002]]
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132, it is determined that this amendment does not have sufficient
federalism implications to require consultations or warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this
amendment.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department of State does not consider this rule to be a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section
3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. The Department is of the opinion
that controlling the import and export of defense articles and services
is a foreign affairs function of the United States Government and that
rules governing the conduct of this function are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866. Because this rulemaking concerns
a foreign affairs function of the United States, the Department of
State has determined that public participation in this rulemaking under
Section 2 of Executive Order 13563 is not required.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed the amendment in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and
reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I,
Subchapter M, part 126, is amended as follows:
PART 126--GENERAL POLICIES AND PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90
Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780, 2791 and 2797); E.O. 11958,
42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p.79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C.
287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.899; Sec. 1225,
Pub. L. 108-375.
0
2. Section 126.1 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) and (k) to read
as follows:
Sec. 126.1 Prohibited exports and sales to certain countries.
* * * * *
(c) Exports and sales prohibited by United Nations Security Council
embargoes. Whenever the United Nations Security Council mandates an
arms embargo, all transactions that are prohibited by the embargo and
that involve U.S. persons (see Sec. 120.15 of this chapter) anywhere,
or any person in the United States, and defense articles or services of
a type enumerated on the United States Munitions List (22 CFR part
121), irrespective of origin, are prohibited under the ITAR for the
duration of the embargo, unless the Department of State publishes a
notice in the Federal Register specifying different measures. This
would include, but is not limited to, transactions involving trade by
U.S. persons who are located inside or outside of the United States in
defense articles or services of U.S. or foreign origin that are located
inside or outside of the United States. United Nations Arms Embargoes
include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following countries:
(1) Cote d'Ivoire.
(2) Democratic Republic of Congo (see also paragraph (i) of this
section).
(3) Iraq.
(4) Iran.
(5) Lebanon.
(6) Liberia.
(7) Libya (see also paragraph (k) of this section).
(8) North Korea.
(9) Sierra Leone.
(10) Somalia.
(11) Sudan.
* * * * *
(k) Libya. It is the policy of the United States to deny licenses
or other approvals for exports or imports of defense articles and
defense services destined for or originating in Libya, except where it
determines, upon case-by-case review, that the transaction (or
activity) is not prohibited under applicable U.N. Security Council
resolutions and that the transaction (or activity) is in furtherance of
the national security and foreign policy of the United States.
* * * * *
Dated: May 17, 2011.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-12621 Filed 5-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P