Notice of Intent To Prepare Draft Environmental Impact Statements/Environmental Impact Reports for the Sutter Basin Feasibility Study and the Section 408 Permission for the Feather River West Levee Project, Sutter and Butte Counties, CA, 29215-29217 [2011-12510]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare Draft
Environmental Impact Statements/
Environmental Impact Reports for the
Sutter Basin Feasibility Study and the
Section 408 Permission for the Feather
River West Levee Project, Sutter and
Butte Counties, CA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers; DoD.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 May 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Notice of intent.
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended, and the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
intends to prepare a separate
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
for each of the following related flood
risk management study efforts in northcentral California: a Feasibility Study of
flood risk management and related
water resources problems in the Sutter
Basin conducted by USACE under the
authority of the Flood Control Act of
1962 (Pub. L. 87–874); and under
Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
BILLING CODE 5001–06–C
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
EN20MY11.065
[FR Doc. 2011–12405 Filed 5–19–11; 8:45 am]
29215
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
29216
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2011 / Notices
of 1899 (as amended) (33 U.S.C. 408),
and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(33 U.S.C. 1344), the proposed Feather
River West Levee Project (FRWLP),
sponsored by the Sutter Butte Flood
Control Agency (SBFCA) as a locally
driven flood management improvement
project. The two projects are being
studied in close coordination because
they partially overlap in their study
areas, purpose, potential improvements,
potential effects, and involved parties.
Therefore, a joint scoping process is
being conducted for the two projects to
explain the relationship between the
two efforts and obtain public input in a
manner that is convenient, efficient, and
integrated. Figures of the two project
areas can be viewed at the SBFCA Web
site at: https://www.sutterbutteflood.org/
index.php/notices_documents.
Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. On
March 20, 2000, the State of California
entered into a feasibility cost-sharing
agreement (FCSA) with USACE to
initiate a feasibility study. An
amendment to the FCSA was signed in
2010, which included SBFCA as a nonFederal sponsor. The purpose of the
study is to address flood risk, ecosystem
restoration and recreation-related issues
in the study area. If a Federal interest is
determined, the study would result in a
decision document, a General
Investigation Feasibility Study report
and EIS/EIR, which would be the basis
for a recommendation to Congress for
authorization. The Central Valley Flood
Protection Board (CVFPB) and SBFCA
are coordinating with USACE on the
feasibility study. USACE, as the Federal
lead agency under NEPA, and SBFCA,
as the state lead agency under CEQA in
coordination with CVFPB, have
determined that an EIS/EIR will be
prepared to describe alternatives,
potential environmental effects, and
mitigation measures.
FRWLP. SBFCA is planning the
FRWLP to construct improvements to
the west levee of the Feather River from
Thermalito Afterbay to the Sutter
Bypass confluence to meet Federal,
state, and local flood protection criteria
and goals. In 2010, an assessment
district was enacted to provide local
funding toward flood management
improvements. These funds may be
matched with those from the Early
Implementation Program (funded
through previous state bonds)
administered by the California
Department of Water Resources (DWR).
In order to implement the project, the
sponsor must acquire permission from
USACE to alter the Federal project
under Section 14 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 (as amended) (33
U.S.C. 408 or, Section 408). USACE also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 May 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
has authority under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) over
activities involving the discharge of
dredged or fill material to waters of the
United States, which are known to be in
the project area. The purpose of the
FRWLP would be to construct
improvements as quickly as possible in
advance of and compatible with the
Sutter Basin Project. USACE, acting as
the Federal lead agency under NEPA,
and SBFCA, acting as the state lead
agency under the CEQA in coordination
with CVFPB, have determined that an
EIS/EIR will be prepared to describe
alternatives, potential environmental
effects, and mitigation measures.
DATES: Public scoping meetings will be
held on Monday, June 27 at 3:30 p.m.
and 6:30 p.m. at the Veterans Memorial
Community Building, 1425 Veterans
Memorial Circle, Yuba City, CA and on
Tuesday, June 28 at 3:30 p.m. and 6:30
p.m. at the Veterans Memorial Hall, 245
Sycamore Street, Gridley, CA. Send
written comments by July 8, 2011 (see
ADDRESSES).
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
suggestions concerning the scope and
content of the environmental
information may be submitted to Mr.
Matt Davis, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Sacramento District, Attn:
Planning Division (CESPK–PD–R), 1325
J Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Requests to be placed on the mailing list
also should be sent to this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed actions
and environmental review process
should be addressed to Matt Davis at
(916) 557–6708, e-mail:
Matthew.G.Davis@usace.army.mil (see
ADDRESSES).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action. Sutter Basin
Feasibility Study. USACE is conducting
a feasibility study to evaluate structural
and non-structural flood-riskmanagement measures, including reoperation of existing reservoirs;
improvements to existing levees;
construction of new levees; and other
storage, conveyance, and non-structural
options. The Sutter Basin study area
covers approximately 285 square miles
and is roughly bounded by the Feather
River, Sutter Bypass, Wadsworth Canal,
Sutter Buttes, and Cherokee Canal.
Flood waters potentially threatening the
study area originate from the Feather
River watershed and/or the upper
Sacramento River watershed, above
Colusa Weir. The study area is
essentially encircled by project levees
and the high ground of Sutter Buttes.
Geotechnical analysis and historical
performance during past floods
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
indicates the project levees are at risk of
failure due to underseepage. The risk of
levee failure coupled with the
consequence of deep flooding presents a
threat to public safety and property.
Considering the collective changes to
riparian and aquatic ecosystems brought
about by agriculture, urbanization,
mining, and flood risk management and
water supply infrastructure, and the
national concern for environmental
quality and protection, every
opportunity to restore and protect
natural resources should be taken
whenever changes in the water
management system are being
contemplated. Ecosystem restoration
measures likely would include
restoration of floodplain function and
habitat. Recreation measures include
those outdoor recreation opportunities
associated with sustainable water
resource development. The feasibility
phase of this project is cost-shared 50%
Federal, 50% non-Federal with the
project sponsors, the State of California
CVFPB and the SBFCA. The study will
focus on alternatives in the study area
that comprise flood risk management,
ecosystem restoration, and recreation
management measures. As part of the
study, an EIS/EIR will be prepared with
USACE as the lead agency under NEPA
and SBFCA in cooperation with CVFPB
as the lead agency under CEQA.
FRWLP. SBFCA is proposing a levee
improvement project along the Feather
River west levee under the California
DWR’s Early Implementation Program to
expeditiously complete flood-risk
reduction measures in advance of the
Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. Known
as the FRWLP, the project proposes to
construct levee improvements between
the Thermalito Afterbay and the Feather
River/Sutter Bypass confluence. Primary
deficiencies of the levee include
through-seepage, under-seepage, and
embankment instability (e.g., overly
steepened slopes). Alternatives
considered may include measures such
as slurry cutoff walls, seepage berms,
stability berms, internal drains, relief
wells, sheet-pile walls, slope flattening,
and potential new levee alignments. As
part of the project, an EIS/EIR is being
prepared. USACE has authority under
Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1899 (as amended) (33 U.S.C. 408),
over alterations to Federal flood control
project levees and any such alterations
as proposed by SBFCA are subject to
approval by USACE. USACE also has
authority under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) over
activities involving the discharge of
dredged or fill material to waters of the
United States, which are known to be in
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2011 / Notices
the project area. Due to these
authorities, USACE is acting as the lead
agency for the EIS pursuant to NEPA.
SBFCA will be acting as the lead agency
for the EIR according to CEQA as an
agency of the State of California with
delegated authority to approve the
project.
2. Alternatives. The EIS/EIRs will
consider several alternatives for
reducing flood damage. Alternatives
analyzed during the investigation will
consist of a combination of one or more
measures to reduce the risk of flooding.
These measures include installing cutoff
walls, and constructing seepage berms.
3. Scoping Process.
a. A series of public scoping meetings
will be held on June 27 and 28, 2011,
to present information to the public and
to receive comments from the public on
both the feasibility study and the
FRWLP. These meetings are intended to
initiate the process to involve concerned
individuals, and local, state, and
Federal agencies.
b. Significant issues to be analyzed in
depth in the environmental documents
include effects on hydraulics, wetlands
and other waters of the U.S., vegetation
and wildlife resources, special-status
species, aesthetics, cultural resources,
recreation, land use, fisheries, water
quality, air quality, transportation, and
socioeconomics; and cumulative effects
of related projects in the study area.
c. USACE is consulting with the State
Historic Preservation Officer to comply
with the National Historic Preservation
Act and with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and National Marine Fisheries
Service to comply with the Endangered
Species Act. USACE also is coordinating
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
to comply with the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act.
d. A 45-day public review period will
be provided for individuals and
agencies to review and comment on the
draft environmental documents. All
interested parties are encouraged to
respond to this notice and provide a
current address if they wish to be
notified of the draft EIS/EIR circulation.
4. Availability. The draft EIS/EIR for
the FRWLP is scheduled to be available
for public review and comment in late
2011. The draft EIS/EIR for the Sutter
Basin Feasibility Study is scheduled to
be available for public review and
comment in mid 2012.
Dated: May 12, 2011.
Andrew B. Kiger,
LTC, EN, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2011–12510 Filed 5–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 May 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Availability of the Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for the Mechanical and
Artificial Creation and Maintenance of
Emergent Sandbar Habitat in the
Riverine Segments of the Upper
Missouri River, Missouri River Basin,
United States
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers intends to file a Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (FPEIS) for the Mechanical
and Artificial Creation and Maintenance
of Emergent Sandbar Habitat on the
Riverine Segments of the Upper
Missouri River with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. The
FEIS is available for final public review.
Details on the proposed action, location
and areas of environmental concern
addressed in the FPEIS are provided
below under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
DATES: The review period will be open
30 days from the date of this notice. The
Record of Decision is anticipated to be
issued in August, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to: Department of the Army;
Corps of Engineers, Omaha District;
CENWO–PM–AC; ATTN: Emergent
Sandbar Habitat Programmatic EIS; 1616
Capitol Avenue; Omaha, NE 68102–
4901, or e-mailed to:
Cynthia.s.upah@usace.army.mil.
Comments must be postmarked,
e-mailed, or otherwise submitted no
later than June 13, 2011. Copies of the
FPEIS have been sent to all agencies and
individuals who participated in the
scoping process or public hearings and
to those requesting copies. The FEIS is
available online at: https://
www.moriverrecovery.org/mrrp/MRRP_
PUB_DEV.download_documentation_
peis. To obtain a copy, please contact
Ms. Cynthia Upah.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cynthia Upah, Project Manager, by
telephone: (402) 995–2672, by mail:
1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE
68102–4901, or by e-mail:
Cynthia.s.upah@usace.army.mil. For
inquires from the media, please contact
the USACE Omaha District Public
Affairs Officer (PAO), Ms. Monique
Farmer by telephone: (402) 995–2416,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29217
by mail: 1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha,
NE 68102, or by e-mail:
Monique.l.farmer@usace.army.mil.
1.
Background. The Emergent Sandbar
Habitat (ESH) program is being
implemented by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) for the benefit of the
interior population of the Interior least
tern (least tern) and the northern Great
Plains piping plover (piping plover).
This implementation program resulted
from a Biological Opinion (BiOp) issued
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) in which the Reasonable and
Prudent Alternative (RPA) called for the
Corps to provide sufficient ESH acreage
in order to meet biological metrics
(fledge ratios) to avoid jeopardizing
continued existence of the species, as
defined by the Endangered Species Act
(ESA).
The FPEIS is needed to provide
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) coverage for the mechanical and
artificial construction of ESH in the
riverine segments of the Upper Missouri
River, pursuant to the 2003 BiOp
Amendment RPA IV(b) 3, and to
compare impacts among a range of
alternatives. The goal is to inform the
selection of a preferred alternative that
allows for the creation and replacement
of sufficient habitat to support tern and
plover populations on the Missouri
River in a safe, efficient and costeffective manner that minimizes
negative environmental consequences.
Alternatives to the proposed project
that are considered in the FPEIS include
(1) no action, including existing
program activities and no action; (2) and
6 action alternatives of various acreage
creation. Environmental issues
addressed in the FPEIS include
hydrology, water quality, aggradation
and degradation, biological resources,
air quality, noise and recreation.
After detailed consideration of the
environmental and social impacts, and
cumulative effects, of the Alternatives,
the Corps has identified an Adaptive
Management Implementation Process
(AMIP) as the preferred alternative, and
not one of the specific acreage
alternatives. The key aspect of the AMIP
is that, rather than selecting a specific
acreage alternative and pursuing such
construction, actions would be
progressively implemented with the
focus on monitoring a combination of
biological and physical metrics
(measurements). Implementation of
progressively larger acreage amounts of
habitat would continue until the desired
biological response is attained and
sustained.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29215-29217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12510]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare Draft Environmental Impact
Statements/Environmental Impact Reports for the Sutter Basin
Feasibility Study and the Section 408 Permission for the Feather River
West Levee Project, Sutter and Butte Counties, CA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) intends to prepare a separate
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
for each of the following related flood risk management study efforts
in north-central California: a Feasibility Study of flood risk
management and related water resources problems in the Sutter Basin
conducted by USACE under the authority of the Flood Control Act of 1962
(Pub. L. 87-874); and under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
[[Page 29216]]
of 1899 (as amended) (33 U.S.C. 408), and Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), the proposed Feather River West Levee
Project (FRWLP), sponsored by the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency
(SBFCA) as a locally driven flood management improvement project. The
two projects are being studied in close coordination because they
partially overlap in their study areas, purpose, potential
improvements, potential effects, and involved parties. Therefore, a
joint scoping process is being conducted for the two projects to
explain the relationship between the two efforts and obtain public
input in a manner that is convenient, efficient, and integrated.
Figures of the two project areas can be viewed at the SBFCA Web site
at: https://www.sutterbutteflood.org/index.php/notices_documents.
Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. On March 20, 2000, the State of
California entered into a feasibility cost-sharing agreement (FCSA)
with USACE to initiate a feasibility study. An amendment to the FCSA
was signed in 2010, which included SBFCA as a non-Federal sponsor. The
purpose of the study is to address flood risk, ecosystem restoration
and recreation-related issues in the study area. If a Federal interest
is determined, the study would result in a decision document, a General
Investigation Feasibility Study report and EIS/EIR, which would be the
basis for a recommendation to Congress for authorization. The Central
Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB) and SBFCA are coordinating with
USACE on the feasibility study. USACE, as the Federal lead agency under
NEPA, and SBFCA, as the state lead agency under CEQA in coordination
with CVFPB, have determined that an EIS/EIR will be prepared to
describe alternatives, potential environmental effects, and mitigation
measures.
FRWLP. SBFCA is planning the FRWLP to construct improvements to the
west levee of the Feather River from Thermalito Afterbay to the Sutter
Bypass confluence to meet Federal, state, and local flood protection
criteria and goals. In 2010, an assessment district was enacted to
provide local funding toward flood management improvements. These funds
may be matched with those from the Early Implementation Program (funded
through previous state bonds) administered by the California Department
of Water Resources (DWR). In order to implement the project, the
sponsor must acquire permission from USACE to alter the Federal project
under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (as amended) (33
U.S.C. 408 or, Section 408). USACE also has authority under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) over activities involving the
discharge of dredged or fill material to waters of the United States,
which are known to be in the project area. The purpose of the FRWLP
would be to construct improvements as quickly as possible in advance of
and compatible with the Sutter Basin Project. USACE, acting as the
Federal lead agency under NEPA, and SBFCA, acting as the state lead
agency under the CEQA in coordination with CVFPB, have determined that
an EIS/EIR will be prepared to describe alternatives, potential
environmental effects, and mitigation measures.
DATES: Public scoping meetings will be held on Monday, June 27 at 3:30
p.m. and 6:30 p.m. at the Veterans Memorial Community Building, 1425
Veterans Memorial Circle, Yuba City, CA and on Tuesday, June 28 at 3:30
p.m. and 6:30 p.m. at the Veterans Memorial Hall, 245 Sycamore Street,
Gridley, CA. Send written comments by July 8, 2011 (see ADDRESSES).
ADDRESSES: Written comments and suggestions concerning the scope and
content of the environmental information may be submitted to Mr. Matt
Davis, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Attn:
Planning Division (CESPK-PD-R), 1325 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Requests to be placed on the mailing list also should be sent to this
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed actions
and environmental review process should be addressed to Matt Davis at
(916) 557-6708, e-mail: Matthew.G.Davis@usace.army.mil (see ADDRESSES).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action. Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. USACE is
conducting a feasibility study to evaluate structural and non-
structural flood-risk-management measures, including re-operation of
existing reservoirs; improvements to existing levees; construction of
new levees; and other storage, conveyance, and non-structural options.
The Sutter Basin study area covers approximately 285 square miles and
is roughly bounded by the Feather River, Sutter Bypass, Wadsworth
Canal, Sutter Buttes, and Cherokee Canal. Flood waters potentially
threatening the study area originate from the Feather River watershed
and/or the upper Sacramento River watershed, above Colusa Weir. The
study area is essentially encircled by project levees and the high
ground of Sutter Buttes. Geotechnical analysis and historical
performance during past floods indicates the project levees are at risk
of failure due to underseepage. The risk of levee failure coupled with
the consequence of deep flooding presents a threat to public safety and
property. Considering the collective changes to riparian and aquatic
ecosystems brought about by agriculture, urbanization, mining, and
flood risk management and water supply infrastructure, and the national
concern for environmental quality and protection, every opportunity to
restore and protect natural resources should be taken whenever changes
in the water management system are being contemplated. Ecosystem
restoration measures likely would include restoration of floodplain
function and habitat. Recreation measures include those outdoor
recreation opportunities associated with sustainable water resource
development. The feasibility phase of this project is cost-shared 50%
Federal, 50% non-Federal with the project sponsors, the State of
California CVFPB and the SBFCA. The study will focus on alternatives in
the study area that comprise flood risk management, ecosystem
restoration, and recreation management measures. As part of the study,
an EIS/EIR will be prepared with USACE as the lead agency under NEPA
and SBFCA in cooperation with CVFPB as the lead agency under CEQA.
FRWLP. SBFCA is proposing a levee improvement project along the
Feather River west levee under the California DWR's Early
Implementation Program to expeditiously complete flood-risk reduction
measures in advance of the Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. Known as the
FRWLP, the project proposes to construct levee improvements between the
Thermalito Afterbay and the Feather River/Sutter Bypass confluence.
Primary deficiencies of the levee include through-seepage, under-
seepage, and embankment instability (e.g., overly steepened slopes).
Alternatives considered may include measures such as slurry cutoff
walls, seepage berms, stability berms, internal drains, relief wells,
sheet-pile walls, slope flattening, and potential new levee alignments.
As part of the project, an EIS/EIR is being prepared. USACE has
authority under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (as
amended) (33 U.S.C. 408), over alterations to Federal flood control
project levees and any such alterations as proposed by SBFCA are
subject to approval by USACE. USACE also has authority under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) over activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill material to waters of the United
States, which are known to be in
[[Page 29217]]
the project area. Due to these authorities, USACE is acting as the lead
agency for the EIS pursuant to NEPA. SBFCA will be acting as the lead
agency for the EIR according to CEQA as an agency of the State of
California with delegated authority to approve the project.
2. Alternatives. The EIS/EIRs will consider several alternatives
for reducing flood damage. Alternatives analyzed during the
investigation will consist of a combination of one or more measures to
reduce the risk of flooding. These measures include installing cutoff
walls, and constructing seepage berms.
3. Scoping Process.
a. A series of public scoping meetings will be held on June 27 and
28, 2011, to present information to the public and to receive comments
from the public on both the feasibility study and the FRWLP. These
meetings are intended to initiate the process to involve concerned
individuals, and local, state, and Federal agencies.
b. Significant issues to be analyzed in depth in the environmental
documents include effects on hydraulics, wetlands and other waters of
the U.S., vegetation and wildlife resources, special-status species,
aesthetics, cultural resources, recreation, land use, fisheries, water
quality, air quality, transportation, and socioeconomics; and
cumulative effects of related projects in the study area.
c. USACE is consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer
to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act and with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service to
comply with the Endangered Species Act. USACE also is coordinating with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to comply with the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act.
d. A 45-day public review period will be provided for individuals
and agencies to review and comment on the draft environmental
documents. All interested parties are encouraged to respond to this
notice and provide a current address if they wish to be notified of the
draft EIS/EIR circulation.
4. Availability. The draft EIS/EIR for the FRWLP is scheduled to be
available for public review and comment in late 2011. The draft EIS/EIR
for the Sutter Basin Feasibility Study is scheduled to be available for
public review and comment in mid 2012.
Dated: May 12, 2011.
Andrew B. Kiger,
LTC, EN, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2011-12510 Filed 5-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P