Requiring Residents Who Live Outside the United States To File Petitions According to Form Instructions, 28303-28305 [2011-11997]
Download as PDF
28303
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 95
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 204
[CIS No. 2502–11, DHS Docket No. USCIS–
2011–0002]
RIN 1615–AB93
Requiring Residents Who Live Outside
the United States To File Petitions
According to Form Instructions
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule with a request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) is amending its
regulations to establish the location
where a Petition for Alien Relative,
Form I–130, or a Petition for Amerasian,
Widow(er), or Special Immigrant, Form
I–360, may be filed, accepted, processed
and approved through form
instructions. DHS is promulgating this
rule to reduce DHS costs by reducing
filings of a Petition for Alien Relative at
non-U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) international
locations, such as United States
consulates and embassies, and to
increase USCIS’s flexibility in
administering this program. DHS is
removing references to offices, form
numbers, approval authorities, and
internal procedures from the regulation.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is
effective on August 15, 2011,
Comment period: Written comments
must be submitted on or before July 18,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DHS Docket No. USCIS–
2011–0002 by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:18 May 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Mail: Sunday Aigbe, Chief,
Regulatory Products Division, Office of
the Executive Secretariat, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Department of Homeland Security, 20
Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Suite
5012, Washington, DC 20529–2020. To
ensure proper handling, please
reference DHS Docket No. USCIS–2011–
0002 on your correspondence. This
mailing address may also be used for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Sunday
Aigbe, Chief Regulatory Products
Division, Office of the Executive
Secretariat, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts
Avenue, NW., Suite 5012, Washington,
DC 20529–2020. Contact Telephone
Number (202) 272–8377.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Klein, Office of Policy and
Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts
Avenue, NW., Suite 1100, Washington,
DC 20529–2020. Contact Telephone
Number (202) 272–1474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
All interested parties are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of this final
rule. To provide the most assistance to
USCIS comments should refer to a
specific portion of the final rule, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include data, information,
or authority that support that
recommended change.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and DHS
Docket No. USCIS–2011–0002 for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
II. Background
DHS is removing regulatory
restrictions on where a Petition for
Alien Relative, Form I–130, and a
Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or
Special Immigrant, Form I–360, on
behalf of a widow or widower may be
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
filed, as well as any prescription of the
location or jurisdiction of the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) or the U.S. Department of State
(DOS) with regard to the acceptance,
processing, and approval of those
petitions. A relative petition is used for
a citizen or lawful permanent resident
(LPR) of the United States to establish
the relationship to certain alien relatives
who wish to immigrate to the United
States. A Petition for Amerasian,
Widow(er), or Special Immigrant is used
by an Amerasian, widow(er), or special
immigrant to classify an alien as such
where the alien wishes to immigrate to
the United States. After approval of
either petition, the eligible family
member or alien may apply for an
immigrant visa or for adjustment of
status to that of an LPR once a visa
number becomes available. See
Immigration and Nationality Act, as
amended (INA), section 203, 245(a), 8
U.S.C. 1153 and 1255(a); 22 CFR 42.41;
8 CFR 245.1(a). No changes are made to
regulations pertaining to the eligibility
of alien relatives to immigrate to the
United States.
III. Reason for This Change
DHS regulations currently provide
that certain petitioners residing in
countries where USCIS does not have an
international office may file a relative
petition or petition by a widow or
widower at a U.S. consulate abroad and
that these petitions may be accepted and
approved by a consular officer. See 8
CFR 204.1(e). DHS is amending the
regulations to require that all petitioners
who reside outside the United States file
a relative petition or petition by a
widow or widower according to the
form instructions. See new 8 CFR
204.1(b). USCIS will amend the form
instructions for relative petitions
concurrently with this rulemaking to
provide the option of either mailing the
petition to the USCIS Chicago Lockbox,
or filing at the USCIS international
office if the petitioner resides in a
country where USCIS has an office.
USCIS will not be amending form
instructions relative to a petition by a
widow or widowers at this time. USCIS
may change these form instructions in
the future as the USCIS transformation
progresses or as necessary to shift filings
among USCIS offices for processing
efficiency.
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
28304
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
This rule represents another step DHS
is taking to remove unnecessary internal
USCIS procedures from regulations and
to transition toward an electronic
environment and away from the filing in
a paper-based environment. See
Removing References to Filing Locations
and Obsolete References to Legacy
Immigration and Naturalization Service;
Adding a Provision To Facilitate the
Expansion of the Use of Approved
Electronic Equivalents of Paper Forms,
74 FR 26933 (June 5, 2009). Further,
USCIS is modernizing its processes and
systems to accommodate and encourage
greater use of electronic data
submission, including e-filing and
electronic interaction. Regulations that
prescribe filing locations and
adjudicative jurisdictions undermine
this transformation process, and this
rule will help alleviate that problem.
DHS will achieve cost-savings by
changing the location of filing Petitions
for Alien Relatives. The current practice
of requiring or permitting petitioners
who live outside the United States to
file a relative petition at DOS consular
offices is inefficient and requires
reimbursement. USCIS has reached an
agreement, as required by law, with the
DOS Consular Service for the provision
of lockbox and receipting services and
must reimburse DOS for the costs of
those services. See 31 U.S.C. 1535.
USCIS is able to receive these petitions
at a lower cost than DOS charges USCIS.
USCIS cannot realize these cost
savings until the regulations eliminate
the option of filing with DOS consular
offices by petitioners who live outside
the United States. See 8 CFR 204.1(e).
This final rule removes those filing
provisions. This change will reduce
inefficiencies, improve the ability of
USCIS to manage its workload, and
reduce the burden on DOS. After this
rule takes effect, petitioners residing
outside of the United States will file
their petitions as directed by the form
instructions. USCIS will alter its form
instructions to provide for the filing of
Petition for Alien Relative with the incountry USCIS office or by mail to a
lockbox in the United States if there is
no in-country USCIS office. Filing
locations and procedures will remain
available on USCIS forms and the
USCIS Web site. Customer service will
remain available where USCIS has an
international presence and through
email. Internal USCIS procedures will
govern who accepts, adjudicates, and
approves petitions.
DHS is revising 8 CFR 204.1 to
remove paragraphs (c), (d), and (e), and
revising paragraph (b) to cross reference
8 CFR 103.2. New 8 CFR 204.1(b). DHS
is removing current paragraphs (c), (d),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:18 May 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
and (e), because they are redundant
with 8 CFR 103.2 and contain
unnecessary internal procedures. DHS is
making those revisions to standardize
what is considered proper filing among
all benefit types, and increase flexibility
by removing form numbers, form titles,
USCIS and DHS job titles, specific
duties assigned to personnel, and
internal operational procedures. DHS is
systematically removing references to
form numbers and form titles in all
USCIS regulations. Mandating a specific
form number reduces USCIS’s flexibility
to modify its business processes to
change filing procedures.
By removing 8 CFR 204.1(e) DHS is
also removing the requirement in that
section that a self-petitioning spouse or
child of an abusive United States citizen
or lawful permanent resident file the
petition with a USCIS office in the
United States. Nevertheless, DHS is
making no substantive changes in this
rule that affect potential filers of either
alien relative or widow(er) petitions.
USCIS may change the Petition for
Amerasian, Widow(er) or Special
Immigrant in the future after complying
with the applicable public notice
requirements and obtaining Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval.
IV. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) requires DHS to provide public
notice and seek public comment on
regulations with limited exceptions,
including ‘‘* * * rules of agency
organization, procedure or practice.’’ 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A). Under this rule, USCIS
will no longer accept hand delivery of
petitions at a United States consulate by
DOS officers. International postal or
delivery costs may slightly increase
filing expenses for a relative petition
filed by some individuals residing
outside the United States. These minor
changes, however, do not substantially
affect a substantive right. See, e.g.,
James V. Hurson Associates, Inc. v.
Glickman, 229 F.3d 277 (DC Cir. 2000)
(‘‘[A]n otherwise-procedural rule does
not become a substantive one, for
notice-and-comment purposes, simply
because it imposes a burden on
regulated parties.’’); see also JEM Broad.
Co. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 320, 326 (DC Cir.
1994). Nonetheless, DHS believes that
public input may be valuable and
invites the public to comment on this
change.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
mandates that DHS conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis when it publishes
any general notice of proposed
rulemaking. 5 U.S.C. 603(a). RFA
analysis is not required when a rule is
exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking. DHS has determined that
this rule is exempt from the notice-andcomment requirements in 5 U.S.C.
553(a), and, therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required. This
procedural rule will impact only
individuals, not small entities as
defined by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
D. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
E. Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
DHS does not consider this rule to be
a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Accordingly, this rule has not
been submitted to the OMB for review.
DHS has considered the benefits and
costs associated with the changes made
in this rule and has determined that the
benefits justify the potential costs.
DHS is taking this action to increase
operational efficiency and to control
USCIS costs for processing relative
petitions. In fiscal year (FY) 2010, a total
of 697,162 relative petitions were
processed by USCIS, 8,135 of them by
USCIS international offices. In that same
year, DOS accepted and processed 9,497
relative petitions in countries where
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
USCIS has no overseas office and 6,576
in countries where USCIS is located.1 In
FY 2010, DOS began charging USCIS for
services rendered in accepting or
processing relative petitions. As a feefunded agency, USCIS is statutorily
authorized to collect fees at a level that
will ensure recovery of the full costs of
providing adjudication and
naturalization services, including
administrative costs and services
provided without charge to certain
applicants and petitioners. See INA
section 286(m), 8 U.S.C. 1356(m). The
current fee of $420 for a relative petition
does not cover the DOS charges.
Therefore, DHS will adjust its internal
processes to avoid the DOS charge,
thereby maintaining the integrity of the
current fee schedule for relative
petitions.
Instructions for filing relative
petitions will be amended concurrently
with this final rule. Instructions for
filing relative petitions will provide the
option of either mailing the petition to
the USCIS Chicago Lockbox, or filing at
the USCIS international office if the
petitioner resides in a country where
USCIS has an office. Depending upon
the unique circumstances of the United
States citizen or lawful permanent
resident petitioner, this rule could result
in a cost savings or additional burden to
the petitioner. Travel costs and mailing
costs vary widely among individual
petitioners. Thus, DHS cannot precisely
estimate the costs or savings impacts of
the rule. For example, when a petitioner
resides in a country with no USCIS
presence, the rule could provide a cost
savings if mailing the petition is less
expensive than the cost of traveling to
the nearest DOS office, or vice versa.
DHS believes that the benefits of
streamlining USCIS operations in
processing alien relative petitions to
avoid DOS charges justifies the potential
cost impact on petitioners residing in
international locations.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
F. Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
1 It is not always clear to what extent DOS
processes each alien relative petition from
examining the volume data. In some cases, DOS is
able to fully adjudicate and process the petition,
while more complex adjudicative cases are
forwarded to USCIS for processing and decision.
Thus, DHS is hesitant to draw statistical
comparisons between DOS and DHS processing
data, especially in cases where there is a USCIS
international office.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:18 May 16, 2011
Jkt 223001
Order 13132, DHS has determined that
this rule does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary
impact statement.
G. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), DHS submits to OMB for
review and approval any reporting or
recordkeeping requirements inherent in
a regulatory action. 44 U.S.C. 3506. The
information collection burden for the
Petition for Alien Relative has been
approved by OMB and assigned OMB
control number 1615–0012. This rule
does not impose any new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
PRA. However, USCIS is making minor
changes to the Petition for Alien
Relative (Form I–130) instructions to
instruct petitioners about where to file.
Accordingly, USCIS will submit a
Correction Worksheet, Form OMB 83–C,
and amended instructions to OMB for
review and approval in accordance with
the PRA.
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 204
Administrative practice and
procedures, Immigration, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, DHS is amending part
204 of chapter I of title 8 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 204—IMMIGRANT PETITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 204
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1151,
1153, 1154, 1182, 1184, 1186a, 1255; 1641; 8
CFR part 2.
Subpart A—Immigrant Visa Petitions
2. Section 204.1 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) and removing and
reserving paragraphs (c), (d), and (e).
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 204.1 General information about
immediate relative and family-sponsored
petitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Proper filing. A petition for alien
relative and a petition for Amerasian,
widow(er), or special immigrant must be
filed on the form prescribed by USCIS
in accordance with the form
instructions, and will be considered
properly filed when the petition is filed
in accordance with 8 CFR 103.2. The
filing date of a petition is the date it is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28305
properly filed and received by USCIS.
That date will constitute the priority
date.
*
*
*
*
*
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–11997 Filed 5–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1264; Airspace
Docket No. 10–AWP–23]
Amendment of Class D and Class E
Airspace; Livermore, CA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends existing
Class E airspace at Livermore, CA, to
accommodate aircraft using new
Instrument Landing System (ILS)
Localizer (LOC) standard instrument
approach procedures at Livermore
Municipal Airport, and also corrects the
airspace designation. This action also
corrects a typographical error in the
airspace description for Class D
airspace. This improves the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC, August
25, 2011. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
History
On February 14, 2011, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend
controlled airspace at Livermore, CA (76
FR 8322). Interested parties were invited
to participate in this rulemaking effort
by submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received.
Class D and Class E airspace
designations are published in paragraph
5000 and 6005, respectively, of FAA
Order 7400.9U dated August 18, 2010,
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28303-28305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11997]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 28303]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 204
[CIS No. 2502-11, DHS Docket No. USCIS-2011-0002]
RIN 1615-AB93
Requiring Residents Who Live Outside the United States To File
Petitions According to Form Instructions
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule with a request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is amending its
regulations to establish the location where a Petition for Alien
Relative, Form I-130, or a Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or
Special Immigrant, Form I-360, may be filed, accepted, processed and
approved through form instructions. DHS is promulgating this rule to
reduce DHS costs by reducing filings of a Petition for Alien Relative
at non-U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) international
locations, such as United States consulates and embassies, and to
increase USCIS's flexibility in administering this program. DHS is
removing references to offices, form numbers, approval authorities, and
internal procedures from the regulation.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is effective on August 15, 2011,
Comment period: Written comments must be submitted on or before
July 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DHS Docket No. USCIS-
2011-0002 by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Sunday Aigbe, Chief, Regulatory Products Division,
Office of the Executive Secretariat, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services, Department of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue,
NW., Suite 5012, Washington, DC 20529-2020. To ensure proper handling,
please reference DHS Docket No. USCIS-2011-0002 on your correspondence.
This mailing address may also be used for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Sunday Aigbe, Chief Regulatory
Products Division, Office of the Executive Secretariat, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security,
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Suite 5012, Washington, DC 20529-2020.
Contact Telephone Number (202) 272-8377.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Klein, Office of Policy and
Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Suite 1100,
Washington, DC 20529-2020. Contact Telephone Number (202) 272-1474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
All interested parties are invited to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written data, views, or arguments on all
aspects of this final rule. To provide the most assistance to USCIS
comments should refer to a specific portion of the final rule, explain
the reason for any recommended change, and include data, information,
or authority that support that recommended change.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and DHS
Docket No. USCIS-2011-0002 for this rulemaking. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
II. Background
DHS is removing regulatory restrictions on where a Petition for
Alien Relative, Form I-130, and a Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or
Special Immigrant, Form I-360, on behalf of a widow or widower may be
filed, as well as any prescription of the location or jurisdiction of
the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) or the U.S.
Department of State (DOS) with regard to the acceptance, processing,
and approval of those petitions. A relative petition is used for a
citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR) of the United States to
establish the relationship to certain alien relatives who wish to
immigrate to the United States. A Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or
Special Immigrant is used by an Amerasian, widow(er), or special
immigrant to classify an alien as such where the alien wishes to
immigrate to the United States. After approval of either petition, the
eligible family member or alien may apply for an immigrant visa or for
adjustment of status to that of an LPR once a visa number becomes
available. See Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (INA),
section 203, 245(a), 8 U.S.C. 1153 and 1255(a); 22 CFR 42.41; 8 CFR
245.1(a). No changes are made to regulations pertaining to the
eligibility of alien relatives to immigrate to the United States.
III. Reason for This Change
DHS regulations currently provide that certain petitioners residing
in countries where USCIS does not have an international office may file
a relative petition or petition by a widow or widower at a U.S.
consulate abroad and that these petitions may be accepted and approved
by a consular officer. See 8 CFR 204.1(e). DHS is amending the
regulations to require that all petitioners who reside outside the
United States file a relative petition or petition by a widow or
widower according to the form instructions. See new 8 CFR 204.1(b).
USCIS will amend the form instructions for relative petitions
concurrently with this rulemaking to provide the option of either
mailing the petition to the USCIS Chicago Lockbox, or filing at the
USCIS international office if the petitioner resides in a country where
USCIS has an office. USCIS will not be amending form instructions
relative to a petition by a widow or widowers at this time. USCIS may
change these form instructions in the future as the USCIS
transformation progresses or as necessary to shift filings among USCIS
offices for processing efficiency.
[[Page 28304]]
This rule represents another step DHS is taking to remove
unnecessary internal USCIS procedures from regulations and to
transition toward an electronic environment and away from the filing in
a paper-based environment. See Removing References to Filing Locations
and Obsolete References to Legacy Immigration and Naturalization
Service; Adding a Provision To Facilitate the Expansion of the Use of
Approved Electronic Equivalents of Paper Forms, 74 FR 26933 (June 5,
2009). Further, USCIS is modernizing its processes and systems to
accommodate and encourage greater use of electronic data submission,
including e-filing and electronic interaction. Regulations that
prescribe filing locations and adjudicative jurisdictions undermine
this transformation process, and this rule will help alleviate that
problem.
DHS will achieve cost-savings by changing the location of filing
Petitions for Alien Relatives. The current practice of requiring or
permitting petitioners who live outside the United States to file a
relative petition at DOS consular offices is inefficient and requires
reimbursement. USCIS has reached an agreement, as required by law, with
the DOS Consular Service for the provision of lockbox and receipting
services and must reimburse DOS for the costs of those services. See 31
U.S.C. 1535. USCIS is able to receive these petitions at a lower cost
than DOS charges USCIS.
USCIS cannot realize these cost savings until the regulations
eliminate the option of filing with DOS consular offices by petitioners
who live outside the United States. See 8 CFR 204.1(e). This final rule
removes those filing provisions. This change will reduce
inefficiencies, improve the ability of USCIS to manage its workload,
and reduce the burden on DOS. After this rule takes effect, petitioners
residing outside of the United States will file their petitions as
directed by the form instructions. USCIS will alter its form
instructions to provide for the filing of Petition for Alien Relative
with the in-country USCIS office or by mail to a lockbox in the United
States if there is no in-country USCIS office. Filing locations and
procedures will remain available on USCIS forms and the USCIS Web site.
Customer service will remain available where USCIS has an international
presence and through email. Internal USCIS procedures will govern who
accepts, adjudicates, and approves petitions.
DHS is revising 8 CFR 204.1 to remove paragraphs (c), (d), and (e),
and revising paragraph (b) to cross reference 8 CFR 103.2. New 8 CFR
204.1(b). DHS is removing current paragraphs (c), (d), and (e), because
they are redundant with 8 CFR 103.2 and contain unnecessary internal
procedures. DHS is making those revisions to standardize what is
considered proper filing among all benefit types, and increase
flexibility by removing form numbers, form titles, USCIS and DHS job
titles, specific duties assigned to personnel, and internal operational
procedures. DHS is systematically removing references to form numbers
and form titles in all USCIS regulations. Mandating a specific form
number reduces USCIS's flexibility to modify its business processes to
change filing procedures.
By removing 8 CFR 204.1(e) DHS is also removing the requirement in
that section that a self-petitioning spouse or child of an abusive
United States citizen or lawful permanent resident file the petition
with a USCIS office in the United States. Nevertheless, DHS is making
no substantive changes in this rule that affect potential filers of
either alien relative or widow(er) petitions. USCIS may change the
Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er) or Special Immigrant in the future
after complying with the applicable public notice requirements and
obtaining Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval.
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires DHS to provide
public notice and seek public comment on regulations with limited
exceptions, including ``* * * rules of agency organization, procedure
or practice.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). Under this rule, USCIS will no
longer accept hand delivery of petitions at a United States consulate
by DOS officers. International postal or delivery costs may slightly
increase filing expenses for a relative petition filed by some
individuals residing outside the United States. These minor changes,
however, do not substantially affect a substantive right. See, e.g.,
James V. Hurson Associates, Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277 (DC Cir.
2000) (``[A]n otherwise-procedural rule does not become a substantive
one, for notice-and-comment purposes, simply because it imposes a
burden on regulated parties.''); see also JEM Broad. Co. v. FCC, 22
F.3d 320, 326 (DC Cir. 1994). Nonetheless, DHS believes that public
input may be valuable and invites the public to comment on this change.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) mandates that DHS conduct a
regulatory flexibility analysis when it publishes any general notice of
proposed rulemaking. 5 U.S.C. 603(a). RFA analysis is not required when
a rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking. DHS has determined
that this rule is exempt from the notice-and-comment requirements in 5
U.S.C. 553(a), and, therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. This procedural rule will impact only individuals, not small
entities as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect of $100 million or more on the
economy; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
E. Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
DHS does not consider this rule to be a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning
and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Accordingly, this
rule has not been submitted to the OMB for review. DHS has considered
the benefits and costs associated with the changes made in this rule
and has determined that the benefits justify the potential costs.
DHS is taking this action to increase operational efficiency and to
control USCIS costs for processing relative petitions. In fiscal year
(FY) 2010, a total of 697,162 relative petitions were processed by
USCIS, 8,135 of them by USCIS international offices. In that same year,
DOS accepted and processed 9,497 relative petitions in countries where
[[Page 28305]]
USCIS has no overseas office and 6,576 in countries where USCIS is
located.\1\ In FY 2010, DOS began charging USCIS for services rendered
in accepting or processing relative petitions. As a fee-funded agency,
USCIS is statutorily authorized to collect fees at a level that will
ensure recovery of the full costs of providing adjudication and
naturalization services, including administrative costs and services
provided without charge to certain applicants and petitioners. See INA
section 286(m), 8 U.S.C. 1356(m). The current fee of $420 for a
relative petition does not cover the DOS charges. Therefore, DHS will
adjust its internal processes to avoid the DOS charge, thereby
maintaining the integrity of the current fee schedule for relative
petitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ It is not always clear to what extent DOS processes each
alien relative petition from examining the volume data. In some
cases, DOS is able to fully adjudicate and process the petition,
while more complex adjudicative cases are forwarded to USCIS for
processing and decision. Thus, DHS is hesitant to draw statistical
comparisons between DOS and DHS processing data, especially in cases
where there is a USCIS international office.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instructions for filing relative petitions will be amended
concurrently with this final rule. Instructions for filing relative
petitions will provide the option of either mailing the petition to the
USCIS Chicago Lockbox, or filing at the USCIS international office if
the petitioner resides in a country where USCIS has an office.
Depending upon the unique circumstances of the United States citizen or
lawful permanent resident petitioner, this rule could result in a cost
savings or additional burden to the petitioner. Travel costs and
mailing costs vary widely among individual petitioners. Thus, DHS
cannot precisely estimate the costs or savings impacts of the rule. For
example, when a petitioner resides in a country with no USCIS presence,
the rule could provide a cost savings if mailing the petition is less
expensive than the cost of traveling to the nearest DOS office, or vice
versa. DHS believes that the benefits of streamlining USCIS operations
in processing alien relative petitions to avoid DOS charges justifies
the potential cost impact on petitioners residing in international
locations.
F. Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of
Executive Order 13132, DHS has determined that this rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism summary impact statement.
G. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), DHS submits to OMB
for review and approval any reporting or recordkeeping requirements
inherent in a regulatory action. 44 U.S.C. 3506. The information
collection burden for the Petition for Alien Relative has been approved
by OMB and assigned OMB control number 1615-0012. This rule does not
impose any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the PRA.
However, USCIS is making minor changes to the Petition for Alien
Relative (Form I-130) instructions to instruct petitioners about where
to file. Accordingly, USCIS will submit a Correction Worksheet, Form
OMB 83-C, and amended instructions to OMB for review and approval in
accordance with the PRA.
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 204
Administrative practice and procedures, Immigration, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, DHS is amending part 204 of chapter I of title 8 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 204--IMMIGRANT PETITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 204 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1151, 1153, 1154, 1182, 1184,
1186a, 1255; 1641; 8 CFR part 2.
Subpart A--Immigrant Visa Petitions
0
2. Section 204.1 is amended by revising paragraph (b) and removing and
reserving paragraphs (c), (d), and (e).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 204.1 General information about immediate relative and family-
sponsored petitions.
* * * * *
(b) Proper filing. A petition for alien relative and a petition for
Amerasian, widow(er), or special immigrant must be filed on the form
prescribed by USCIS in accordance with the form instructions, and will
be considered properly filed when the petition is filed in accordance
with 8 CFR 103.2. The filing date of a petition is the date it is
properly filed and received by USCIS. That date will constitute the
priority date.
* * * * *
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-11997 Filed 5-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P