Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Mr. Erik Erb and 91 Cosigners, 28191-28192 [2011-11941]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules sanitization procedures. To the maximum extent practicable, the transferring agency must remove data using a means that does not remove, disable, destroy, or otherwise render unusable the excess computers or other technical equipment or components. It is imperative that agencies take the necessary steps to ensure that no personal computer, server, external storage device, or related electronic component is transferred that might contain sensitive or confidential information. See Departmental Manual 3575–001, Security Controls in the System Life Cycle/System Development Life Cycle, for additional guidance. § 3201.5 Dollar limitation. There is no dollar limitation on excess computers or other technical equipment obtained under this part. § 3201.6 Restrictions. (a) Only an authorized USDA official may approve the transfer of excess computers or other technical equipment under this part. (b) Excess computers or other technical equipment may be transferred for the purpose of cannibalization, provided that the requestor submits a statement clearly indicating that cannibalization of the requested property will have greater benefit than utilization of the item in its existing form. Cannibalization is a secondary use of equipment and, therefore, these requests are considered subordinate to requests for primary use. (c) Organizations will only receive property for cannibalization when it has been specifically requested by the recipient and the cannibalized parts must only be used in computers or other technical equipment destined for eligible recipients. § 3201.7 Title. Title of ownership to excess computers or other technical equipment transferred under this part shall automatically pass to the recipient once the transferring agency and recipient or designated organization sign the transfer form indicating that the organization has received the property. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 § 3201.8 Costs. The organization must pay any costs associated with packaging and transportation of the property unless it has made other arrangements. The organization must remove property from the USDA agency’s premises within 15 calendar days after being notified that the property is available for pickup, unless otherwise coordinated with the USDA agency. If the recipient decides VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 May 13, 2011 Jkt 223001 prior to picking up or removing the property that it no longer wants the property, it must notify the USDA agency that approved the transfer request that the property is no longer needed. § 3201.9 Accountability and recordkeeping. (a) USDA requires all excess computers or other technical equipment received by an eligible recipient pursuant to this part be placed into use within one year of receipt of the property and used for at least one year thereafter. The recipient’s PMO must maintain accountable records for such property during this time period. (b) GSA requires that all excess personal property given to non-Federal recipients be reported each fiscal year. USDA agencies that transfer property under this part must report the transfers in their annual reports to OPPM and include both the recipient and organization names. OPPM will review the reports for accuracy, as well as fair and equitable distribution of the excess computers or other technical equipment, before submitting to GSA. § 3201.10 Disposal. When property received under this part is no longer needed by the recipient, it must be disposed of in an environmentally sound manner that is not detrimental or dangerous to public health or safety and in accordance with all Federal, state and local laws. § 3200.11 Liabilities and losses. USDA assumes no liability with respect to accidents, bodily injury, illness, or any other damages or loss related to excess computers or other technical equipment transferred under this part. The recipient/designated organization is advised to insure or otherwise protect itself and others as appropriate. Dated: May 6, 2011. Lisa M. Wilusz, Director. [FR Doc. 2011–11601 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–TX–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 26 [Docket No. PRM–26–6; NRC–2010–0310] Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Mr. Erik Erb and 91 Cosigners Nuclear Regulatory Commission. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 28191 Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process. ACTION: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has decided to consider the issues raised in a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by Erik Erb, the petitioner, and 91 cosigners, in the planned ‘‘Quality Control/Quality Verification’’ (QC/QV) rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090). The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations to decrease the minimum days off requirement for security officers working 12 hour shifts from an average of 3 days per week to 2.5 or 2 days per week. ADDRESSES: Further NRC action on the issues raised by this petition will be accessible at the Federal rulemaking Web site, http://www.regulations.gov, by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. You can access publicly available documents related to the petition using the following methods: • NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are available electronically at the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at http:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of the NRC’s public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301– 415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. • Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and supporting materials related to this petition can be found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher, telephone: 301–492–3668; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 23, 2010, (75 FR 71368), the NRC published a Notice of Receipt of a PRM filed on August 17, 2010, by Erik Erb and 91 cosigners, and request for public comment. The comment period closed on February 7, 2011. The NRC received five public comments. The NRC determined that the issues raised in PRM–26–6 are appropriate for SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM 16MYP1 28192 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules consideration, and will consider them in the planned QC/QV rulemaking. The NRC staff will address the comments filed in PRM–26–6 as part of the QC/QV rulemaking. This PRM docket is closed. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of April 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Martin J. Virgilio, Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs. [FR Doc. 2011–11941 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 26 [Docket No. PRM–26–3] [NRC–2009–0482] Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by the Professional Reactor Operator Society Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has decided to consider the issues raised in a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by Robert Meyer, on behalf of the Professional Reactor Operator Society (PROS), the petitioner, in the planned ‘‘Quality Control/Quality Verification’’ (QC/QV) rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC– 2009–0090). The petitioner asked the NRC to amend the regulations that govern fitness-for-duty programs. Specifically, the petitioner asked the NRC to change the term ‘‘unit outage’’ to ‘‘site outage’’ and that the definition of ‘‘site outage’’ read ‘‘up to one week prior to disconnecting the reactor unit from the grid and up to 75-percent turbine power following reconnection to the grid.’’ SUMMARY: Further NRC action on the issues raised by this petition will be accessible at the Federal rulemaking Web site, http://www.regulations.gov, by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. You can access publicly available documents related to the petition using the following methods: • NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 ADDRESSES: VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 May 13, 2011 Jkt 223001 • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are available electronically at the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at http:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of the NRC’s public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and supporting materials related to this petition can be found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher, telephone: 301–492–3668; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 26 [Docket No. PRM–26–5; NRC–2010–0304] Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by the Nuclear Energy Institute Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has decided to consider the issues raised in a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by Anthony R. Pietrangelo, on behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), the petitioner, in the planned ‘‘Quality Control/Quality Verification’’ (QC/QV) rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC–2009– 0090). The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations regarding its fitness-for-duty programs to refine existing requirements based on experience gained since the regulations FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara were last amended in 2008. Inverso, Office of Nuclear Reactor ADDRESSES: Further NRC action on the Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory issues raised by this petition will be Commission, Washington, DC 20555; accessible at the Federal rulemaking telephone: 301–415–1024; e-mail: Web site, http://www.regulations.gov, by tara.inverso@nrc.gov or Tim Reed, searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, You can access publicly available U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; telephone: 301– documents related to the petition using 415–1462; e-mail: timothy.reed@nrc.gov. the following methods: • NRC’s Public Document Room SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On (PDR): The public may examine and November 27, 2009 (74 FR 62257), the have copied, for a fee, publicly available NRC published Notice of Receipt of a documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21, PRM filed by Robert Meyer, on behalf of One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville the PROS, and request for public Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents comment. The comment period closed Access and Management System on February 10, 2010, and the NRC (ADAMS): Publicly available documents received four comments. created or received at the NRC are The NRC determined that the issues available electronically at the NRC’s raised in PRM–26–3 are appropriate for Electronic Reading Room at http:// consideration and will consider them in www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. the planned QC/QV rulemaking. The From this page, the public can gain NRC staff will address the comments entry into ADAMS, which provides text filed in PRM–26–3 as part of the QC/QV and image files of the NRC’s public rulemaking. This PRM docket is closed. documents. If you do not have access to Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in of April 2011. ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, Martin J. Virgilio, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Preparedness Programs. • Federal Rulemaking Web Site: [FR Doc. 2011–11946 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am] Public comments and supporting BILLING CODE 7590–01–P materials related to this petition can be found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM 16MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28191-28192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11941]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 26

[Docket No. PRM-26-6; NRC-2010-0310]


Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Mr. Erik Erb and 91 
Cosigners

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking 
process.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has decided to 
consider the issues raised in a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted 
by Erik Erb, the petitioner, and 91 cosigners, in the planned ``Quality 
Control/Quality Verification'' (QC/QV) rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC-2009-
0090). The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations to 
decrease the minimum days off requirement for security officers working 
12 hour shifts from an average of 3 days per week to 2.5 or 2 days per 
week.

ADDRESSES: Further NRC action on the issues raised by this petition 
will be accessible at the Federal rulemaking Web site, http://www.regulations.gov, by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: 
NRC-2009-0090.
    You can access publicly available documents related to the petition 
using the following methods:
     NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine 
and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC's 
PDR, O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland 20852.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC 
are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public 
can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of the 
NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there 
are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the 
NRC's PDR reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail 
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
     Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and 
supporting materials related to this petition can be found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID: 
NRC-2009-0090. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher, 
telephone: 301-492-3668; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 23, 2010, (75 FR 71368), the NRC 
published a Notice of Receipt of a PRM filed on August 17, 2010, by 
Erik Erb and 91 cosigners, and request for public comment. The comment 
period closed on February 7, 2011. The NRC received five public 
comments.
    The NRC determined that the issues raised in PRM-26-6 are 
appropriate for

[[Page 28192]]

consideration, and will consider them in the planned QC/QV rulemaking. 
The NRC staff will address the comments filed in PRM-26-6 as part of 
the QC/QV rulemaking. This PRM docket is closed.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of April 2011.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Martin J. Virgilio,
Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-11941 Filed 5-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P