Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Mr. Erik Erb and 91 Cosigners, 28191-28192 [2011-11941]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
sanitization procedures. To the
maximum extent practicable, the
transferring agency must remove data
using a means that does not remove,
disable, destroy, or otherwise render
unusable the excess computers or other
technical equipment or components. It
is imperative that agencies take the
necessary steps to ensure that no
personal computer, server, external
storage device, or related electronic
component is transferred that might
contain sensitive or confidential
information. See Departmental Manual
3575–001, Security Controls in the
System Life Cycle/System Development
Life Cycle, for additional guidance.
§ 3201.5
Dollar limitation.
There is no dollar limitation on excess
computers or other technical equipment
obtained under this part.
§ 3201.6
Restrictions.
(a) Only an authorized USDA official
may approve the transfer of excess
computers or other technical equipment
under this part.
(b) Excess computers or other
technical equipment may be transferred
for the purpose of cannibalization,
provided that the requestor submits a
statement clearly indicating that
cannibalization of the requested
property will have greater benefit than
utilization of the item in its existing
form. Cannibalization is a secondary use
of equipment and, therefore, these
requests are considered subordinate to
requests for primary use.
(c) Organizations will only receive
property for cannibalization when it has
been specifically requested by the
recipient and the cannibalized parts
must only be used in computers or other
technical equipment destined for
eligible recipients.
§ 3201.7
Title.
Title of ownership to excess
computers or other technical equipment
transferred under this part shall
automatically pass to the recipient once
the transferring agency and recipient or
designated organization sign the transfer
form indicating that the organization
has received the property.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 3201.8
Costs.
The organization must pay any costs
associated with packaging and
transportation of the property unless it
has made other arrangements. The
organization must remove property from
the USDA agency’s premises within 15
calendar days after being notified that
the property is available for pickup,
unless otherwise coordinated with the
USDA agency. If the recipient decides
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:27 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
prior to picking up or removing the
property that it no longer wants the
property, it must notify the USDA
agency that approved the transfer
request that the property is no longer
needed.
§ 3201.9 Accountability and
recordkeeping.
(a) USDA requires all excess
computers or other technical equipment
received by an eligible recipient
pursuant to this part be placed into use
within one year of receipt of the
property and used for at least one year
thereafter. The recipient’s PMO must
maintain accountable records for such
property during this time period.
(b) GSA requires that all excess
personal property given to non-Federal
recipients be reported each fiscal year.
USDA agencies that transfer property
under this part must report the transfers
in their annual reports to OPPM and
include both the recipient and
organization names. OPPM will review
the reports for accuracy, as well as fair
and equitable distribution of the excess
computers or other technical
equipment, before submitting to GSA.
§ 3201.10
Disposal.
When property received under this
part is no longer needed by the
recipient, it must be disposed of in an
environmentally sound manner that is
not detrimental or dangerous to public
health or safety and in accordance with
all Federal, state and local laws.
§ 3200.11
Liabilities and losses.
USDA assumes no liability with
respect to accidents, bodily injury,
illness, or any other damages or loss
related to excess computers or other
technical equipment transferred under
this part. The recipient/designated
organization is advised to insure or
otherwise protect itself and others as
appropriate.
Dated: May 6, 2011.
Lisa M. Wilusz,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–11601 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–TX–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. PRM–26–6; NRC–2010–0310]
Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by
Mr. Erik Erb and 91 Cosigners
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28191
Petition for rulemaking;
consideration in the rulemaking
process.
ACTION:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has decided to
consider the issues raised in a petition
for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by Erik
Erb, the petitioner, and 91 cosigners, in
the planned ‘‘Quality Control/Quality
Verification’’ (QC/QV) rulemaking
(Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090). The
petitioner requested that the NRC
amend its regulations to decrease the
minimum days off requirement for
security officers working 12 hour shifts
from an average of 3 days per week to
2.5 or 2 days per week.
ADDRESSES: Further NRC action on the
issues raised by this petition will be
accessible at the Federal rulemaking
Web site, https://www.regulations.gov, by
searching on the QC/QV rulemaking
Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090.
You can access publicly available
documents related to the petition using
the following methods:
• NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR): The public may examine and
have copied, for a fee, publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
created or received at the NRC are
available electronically at the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
From this page, the public can gain
entry into ADAMS, which provides text
and image files of the NRC’s public
documents. If you do not have access to
ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site:
Public comments and supporting
materials related to this petition can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching on the QC/QV rulemaking
Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher, telephone: 301–492–3668;
e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 23, 2010, (75 FR 71368), the
NRC published a Notice of Receipt of a
PRM filed on August 17, 2010, by Erik
Erb and 91 cosigners, and request for
public comment. The comment period
closed on February 7, 2011. The NRC
received five public comments.
The NRC determined that the issues
raised in PRM–26–6 are appropriate for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28192
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
consideration, and will consider them
in the planned QC/QV rulemaking. The
NRC staff will address the comments
filed in PRM–26–6 as part of the QC/QV
rulemaking. This PRM docket is closed.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of April 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Martin J. Virgilio,
Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and
Preparedness Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–11941 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. PRM–26–3]
[NRC–2009–0482]
Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by
the Professional Reactor Operator
Society
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Petition for rulemaking;
consideration in the rulemaking
process.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has decided to
consider the issues raised in a petition
for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by
Robert Meyer, on behalf of the
Professional Reactor Operator Society
(PROS), the petitioner, in the planned
‘‘Quality Control/Quality Verification’’
(QC/QV) rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC–
2009–0090). The petitioner asked the
NRC to amend the regulations that
govern fitness-for-duty programs.
Specifically, the petitioner asked the
NRC to change the term ‘‘unit outage’’ to
‘‘site outage’’ and that the definition of
‘‘site outage’’ read ‘‘up to one week prior
to disconnecting the reactor unit from
the grid and up to 75-percent turbine
power following reconnection to the
grid.’’
SUMMARY:
Further NRC action on the
issues raised by this petition will be
accessible at the Federal rulemaking
Web site, https://www.regulations.gov, by
searching on the QC/QV rulemaking
Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090.
You can access publicly available
documents related to the petition using
the following methods:
• NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR): The public may examine and
have copied, for a fee, publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:27 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
created or received at the NRC are
available electronically at the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
From this page, the public can gain
entry into ADAMS, which provides text
and image files of the NRC’s public
documents. If you do not have access to
ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public
comments and supporting materials
related to this petition can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID:
NRC–2009–0090. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301–492–3668; e-mail:
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. PRM–26–5; NRC–2010–0304]
Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by
the Nuclear Energy Institute
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Petition for rulemaking;
consideration in the rulemaking
process.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has decided to
consider the issues raised in a petition
for rulemaking (PRM) submitted by
Anthony R. Pietrangelo, on behalf of the
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), the
petitioner, in the planned ‘‘Quality
Control/Quality Verification’’ (QC/QV)
rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC–2009–
0090). The petitioner requested that the
NRC amend its regulations regarding its
fitness-for-duty programs to refine
existing requirements based on
experience gained since the regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara were last amended in 2008.
Inverso, Office of Nuclear Reactor
ADDRESSES: Further NRC action on the
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
issues raised by this petition will be
Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
accessible at the Federal rulemaking
telephone: 301–415–1024; e-mail:
Web site, https://www.regulations.gov, by
tara.inverso@nrc.gov or Tim Reed,
searching on the QC/QV rulemaking
Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
You can access publicly available
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555; telephone: 301– documents related to the petition using
415–1462; e-mail: timothy.reed@nrc.gov. the following methods:
• NRC’s Public Document Room
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
(PDR): The public may examine and
November 27, 2009 (74 FR 62257), the
have copied, for a fee, publicly available
NRC published Notice of Receipt of a
documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21,
PRM filed by Robert Meyer, on behalf of One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
the PROS, and request for public
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
comment. The comment period closed
Access and Management System
on February 10, 2010, and the NRC
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
received four comments.
created or received at the NRC are
The NRC determined that the issues
available electronically at the NRC’s
raised in PRM–26–3 are appropriate for
Electronic Reading Room at https://
consideration and will consider them in www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
the planned QC/QV rulemaking. The
From this page, the public can gain
NRC staff will address the comments
entry into ADAMS, which provides text
filed in PRM–26–3 as part of the QC/QV and image files of the NRC’s public
rulemaking. This PRM docket is closed. documents. If you do not have access to
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in
of April 2011.
ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
Martin J. Virgilio,
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Preparedness Programs.
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site:
[FR Doc. 2011–11946 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
Public comments and supporting
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
materials related to this petition can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching on the QC/QV rulemaking
Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28191-28192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11941]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. PRM-26-6; NRC-2010-0310]
Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Mr. Erik Erb and 91
Cosigners
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking
process.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has decided to
consider the issues raised in a petition for rulemaking (PRM) submitted
by Erik Erb, the petitioner, and 91 cosigners, in the planned ``Quality
Control/Quality Verification'' (QC/QV) rulemaking (Docket ID: NRC-2009-
0090). The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations to
decrease the minimum days off requirement for security officers working
12 hour shifts from an average of 3 days per week to 2.5 or 2 days per
week.
ADDRESSES: Further NRC action on the issues raised by this petition
will be accessible at the Federal rulemaking Web site, https://www.regulations.gov, by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID:
NRC-2009-0090.
You can access publicly available documents related to the petition
using the following methods:
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine
and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC's
PDR, O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC
are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public
can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of the
NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there
are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the
NRC's PDR reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and
supporting materials related to this petition can be found at https://www.regulations.gov by searching on the QC/QV rulemaking Docket ID:
NRC-2009-0090. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301-492-3668; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 23, 2010, (75 FR 71368), the NRC
published a Notice of Receipt of a PRM filed on August 17, 2010, by
Erik Erb and 91 cosigners, and request for public comment. The comment
period closed on February 7, 2011. The NRC received five public
comments.
The NRC determined that the issues raised in PRM-26-6 are
appropriate for
[[Page 28192]]
consideration, and will consider them in the planned QC/QV rulemaking.
The NRC staff will address the comments filed in PRM-26-6 as part of
the QC/QV rulemaking. This PRM docket is closed.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of April 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Martin J. Virgilio,
Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-11941 Filed 5-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P