Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of Existing Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf-Acquire a Lease Noncompetitively, 28178-28180 [2011-11908]
Download as PDF
28178
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
provisions of the Arms Export Control
Act and the ITAR.
(c) The end-user or consignee may
satisfy the condition in paragraph (b) of
this section, prior to transferring defense
articles, by requiring:
(1) A security clearance approved by
the host nation government for its
employees, or
(2) The end-user or consignee to have
in place a process to screen its
employees and to have executed a NonDisclosure Agreement that provides
assurances that the employee will not
transfer any defense articles to persons
or entities unless specifically authorized
by the consignee or end-user. The enduser or consignee must screen its
employees for substantive contacts with
restricted or prohibited countries listed
in § 126.1. Substantive contacts include
regular travel to such countries, recent
or continuing contact with agents,
brokers, and nationals of such countries,
continued demonstrated allegiance to
such countries, maintenance of business
relationships with persons from such
countries, maintenance of a residence in
such countries, receiving salary or other
continuing monetary compensation
from such countries, or acts otherwise
indicating a risk of diversion. Although
nationality does not, in and of itself,
prohibit access to defense articles, an
employee who has substantive contacts
with persons from countries listed in
§ 126.1(a) shall be presumed to raise a
risk of diversion, unless DDTC
determines otherwise. End-users and
consignees must maintain a technology
security/clearance plan that includes
procedures for screening employees for
such substantive contacts and maintain
records of such screening for five years.
The technology security/clearance plan
and screening records shall be made
available to DDTC or its agents for civil
and criminal law enforcement purposes
upon request.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–11697 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
Regulation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 285
[Docket ID: BOEM–2010–0045]
RIN 1010–AD71
Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of
Existing Facilities on the Outer
Continental Shelf—Acquire a Lease
Noncompetitively
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOEMRE), Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule revises
BOEMRE regulations that pertain to
noncompetitive acquisition of an Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) renewable
energy lease. We are taking this action
because under the current regulations
the process for acquiring a lease
noncompetitively that is initiated by an
unsolicited request is inconsistent with
the process for acquiring a lease
noncompetitively that is initiated by
BOEMRE. By revising regulations which
govern the lease acquisition process
starting with submission of an
unsolicited request, and regulations
which govern the lease acquisition
process starting with BOEMRE issuance
of a Request for Interest (RFI) or a Call
for Information and Nomination (Call),
this rulemaking will make the two
processes consistent with each other.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective June 15, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Redding at (703) 787–1219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
As originally written, § 285.231
allowed the award of a noncompetitive
lease after BOEMRE received an
unsolicited request for a noncompetitive
lease if BOEMRE determined that there
was no competitive interest after
publishing a single notice of a request
for interest relating to the unsolicited
request for a noncompetitive lease. As
originally written, § 285.232 provided
that if BOEMRE published an RFI or
Call resulting in a single expression of
interest in a discrete portion within the
RFI or Call area, BOEMRE could offer a
lease for that area through a
noncompetitive process only if it also
issued a notice of request for interest as
required by § 285.231(b) and
subsequently determined that there was
no competitive interest based on
responses to that notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BOEMRE believes that the
requirement for another notice
following an RFI or Call was redundant
and was at odds with the
noncompetitive process prescribed for
cases in which a party submitted an
unsolicited request for an OCS
renewable energy lease, where BOEMRE
is required to publish only a single
notice. The final rule revises
§ 285.232(c) to refer to the process
outlined in § 285.231(d) through (i)
rather than § 285.231(b) through (i),
thereby eliminating this discrepancy by
requiring only one RFI notice for
determining competitive interest in all
cases. This will make BOEMRE’s leasing
processes more streamlined and
efficient while maintaining BOEMRE’s
obligations to notify the public of areas
that may be leased, to solicit public
input regarding those areas, and to
determine whether competitive interest
exists in acquiring leases in those areas.
Comments on the Proposed Rule
BOEMRE published a proposed rule
on February 16, 2011 (76 FR 8962), and
received a total of 76 comments.
The Offshore Wind Development
Coalition, the National Hydropower
Association, Offshore MW LLC, the
American Wind Energy Association,
and the National Wildlife Federation
expressed support for revising the rule
as proposed and endorsed BOEMRE’s
rationale for doing so.
The Alliance to Protect Nantucket
Sound (APNS) and the Oceans Public
Trust Initiative (OPTI) objected to
revising the rule and objected to
BOEMRE’s rationale. The APNS stated
that the proposed rule would promote a
land rush attitude, diminish
competition, and marginalize public
review by shortening the environmental
review process for OCS wind
developers. The OPTI stated that it
appears that the sole purpose for
revising the regulations appears to be to
make leasing move more quickly, which
could be at the expense of more careful
and balanced review. The OPTI also
stated that revising the rule as proposed
promotes collusion among industry
participants. Defenders of Wildlife did
not explicitly offer an opinion in favor
of or in opposition to the proposed rule
revision. However, it stated that, ‘‘In
proposing to arbitrarily set a new
criteria for an expedited accelerated
permitting process solely on the basis of
the number of applicants for a lease at
a particular location, BOEMRE appears
to ignore in this rulemaking any and all
parameters that make a particular
location unique * * *.’’
BOEMRE received 68 comments from
private citizens, 3 that expressed
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
support for revising the rule, 55 that
expressed opposition (including 50 form
letters), and 10 that were not germane to
the rulemaking. The comments
supporting the rule revision stated that
it will promote more efficient
noncompetitive leasing processes
without curtailing public input and
environmental review procedures. The
comments opposing the rule revision
asserted that it will reduce or eliminate
competition, thereby promoting an
offshore land rush for renewable energy
leases, and will marginalize the public
review process.
After reviewing the comments on the
proposed rule, BOEMRE has concluded
that there is no compelling reason not
to promulgate the final rule. As we have
maintained throughout this rulemaking,
the revision of the regulations will
eliminate inefficiency and provide
consistency while preserving adequate
opportunity for public notice and
review in BOEMRE noncompetitive
leasing processes. The final rule will
have no effect on the environmental
review process carried out pursuant to
the requirements in the National
Environmental Policy Act. In response
to concerns that the proposed rule will
diminish competition, the final rule will
have no effect on competition and is
fully consistent with BOEMRE’s
obligations under subsection 8(p) of the
OCS Lands Act, as amended, to offer
OCS renewable energy leases on a
competitive basis unless we determine,
after public notice of a proposed lease,
that there is no competitive interest.
BOEMRE leasing processes under the
renewable energy regulatory framework,
as revised by this final rule, will
continue to provide for thorough
BOEMRE review of all relevant
environmental and cultural criteria, as
well as public participation.
Consequently, we believe the final rule
will have no effect whatsoever on
potential collusion among offshore
renewable energy developers.
Regulatory Requirements
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This final rule is not a significant rule
as defined by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) and is not subject to
review under E.O. 12866.
(1) This final rule will not have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect
in a material way the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
(2) This final rule will not create a
serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency. The final
rule will eliminate unnecessary
redundancy and inefficiency.
(3) This final rule will not alter the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients.
(4) This final rule will not raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The Department
prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
for 30 CFR part 285 and concluded that
the regulations will impact a substantial
number of small entities, but will not
have a significant economic impact on
the small entities in comparison to the
impacts on large entities. That analysis
was discussed in detail in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking for 30 CFR part
285 published in the Federal Register
on July 9, 2008 (73 FR 39376).
The North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code for
the industries affected by this rule is
221119 (Other Electric Power
Generation). The definition for this code
is:
‘‘This U.S. industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
operating electric power generation
facilities (except hydroelectric, fossil
fuel, nuclear). These facilities convert
other forms of energy, such as solar,
wind, or tidal power, into electrical
energy. The electric energy produced in
these establishments is provided to
electric power transmission systems or
to electric power distribution systems.’’
It is possible that this final rule could
eventually affect entities that produce
hydrogen and fall under NAICS Code
325120 (Industrial Gas Manufacturing).
The definition for this code is:
‘‘This industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
manufacturing industrial organic and
inorganic gases in compressed, liquid,
or solid forms.’’
Given the original findings of the
regulatory flexibility analysis done for
30 CFR part 285, as well as the minor
adjustment to the renewable energy
leasing process that is accomplished,
this final rule will not have a significant
effect on a substantial number of small
entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28179
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This final rule is not a major rule
under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.). This final rule:
a. Will not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Will not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The requirements will apply
indiscriminately to entities intending to
acquire a renewable energy lease on the
OCS pursuant to 30 CFR part 285.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995
This final rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
final rule will not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) is not
required.
Takings Implication Assessment (E.O.
12630)
Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this
final rule does not have significant
takings implications. The final rule is
not a governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally
protected property rights. A Takings
Implication Assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this
final rule does not have federalism
implications. This final rule will not
substantially and directly affect the
relationship between the Federal and
State Governments. To the extent that
State and local governments have a role
in OCS activities, this final rule will not
affect that role. A Federalism
Assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This final rule complies with the
requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this final rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
28180
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated this final rule and
determined that it has no substantial
effects on Federally recognized Indian
Tribes.
This final rule is not a significant
energy action under the definition in
E.O. 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This final rulemaking does not
contain new information collection
requirements; therefore, an OMB
submission under the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required. The PRA
provides that an agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Until OMB approves a collection of
information and assigns a control
number, you are not required to
respond. The revisions in this final
rulemaking refer to, but will not change,
information collection requirements in
30 CFR part 285. The OMB approved
the information collection requirements
contained in 30 CFR part 285 under
OMB Control Number 1010–0176
(expiration 3/31/2013).
Dated: April 28, 2011.
Ned Farquhar,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and
Minerals Management.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 285
Continental shelf, Environmental
protection, Public lands.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969
This final rule does not constitute a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment. BOEMRE has analyzed
this final rule under the criteria of the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and the Department’s
regulations implementing NEPA. This
final rule meets the criteria set forth at
43 CFR 46.210(i) for a Departmental
Categorical Exclusion in that this final
rule is ‘‘* * * of an administrative,
financial, legal, technical, or procedural
nature; or whose environmental effects
are too broad, speculative, or conjectural
to lend themselves to meaningful
analysis * * *.’’ Further, BOEMRE has
analyzed this final rule to determine if
it meets any of the extraordinary
circumstances that will require an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement as set
forth in 43 CFR 46.215 and concluded
that this final rule, being purely
procedural, does not meet any of the
criteria for extraordinary circumstances.
Data Quality Act
In developing this final rule, BOEMRE
did not conduct or use a study,
experiment, or survey requiring peer
review under the Data Quality Act (Pub.
L. 106–554, app. C § 515, 114 Stat. 2763,
2763A–153–154).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:45 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOEMRE) amends 30 CFR
part 285 as follows:
PART 285—RENEWABLE ENERGY
ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING
FACILITIES ON THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
1. The authority citation for part 285
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 43 U.S.C.
1337.
2. Amend § 285.231 by revising the
section heading and paragraph (d)(1) to
read as follows:
■
§ 285.231 How will BOEMRE process my
unsolicited request for a noncompetitive
lease?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) We will publish in the Federal
Register a notice that there is no
competitive interest; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 285.232 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 285.232 May I acquire a lease
noncompetitively after responding to a
Request for Interest or Call for Information
and Nominations under § 285.213?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) After receiving the acquisition fee,
BOEMRE will follow the process
outlined in § 285.231(d) through (i).
[FR Doc. 2011–11908 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Final rule; correcting
amendment.
ACTION:
In the Federal Register of
April 21, 2011, the Department of the
Navy (DoN) published a final rule
concerning certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS). That
document contained incorrect
information concerning side lights arc of
visibility; rule 21(b). This correcting
amendment corrects that information.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: May 16, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Jaewon Choi, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Admiralty Attorney, (Admiralty
and Maritime Law), Office of the Judge
Advocate General, Department of the
Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE, Suite
3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR Part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS MICHIGAN (SSBN 727) and USS
Georgia (SSBN 729) are vessels of the
Navy which, due to their special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with specific provisions of 72
COLREGS without interfering with their
special function as naval ships. The
vessels have been converted from
SSBN’s to SSGN’s and this amendment
will edit the classification of the vessels
to accurately reflect their new
designation as SSGN’s. This amendment
does not change the vessels’ previously
noted deviations from 72 COLREGS.
The DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law) has also certified that the lights
involved are located in closest possible
compliance with the applicable 72
COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on previous and unchanged
technical findings that the placement of
lights on these vessels in a manner
differently from that prescribed herein
will adversely affect the vessel’s ability
to perform its military functions.
Furthermore, this amendment merely
changes the classification of these
vessels and does not reflect any changes
to the placement of lights on any of
these vessels.
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28178-28180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11908]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 285
[Docket ID: BOEM-2010-0045]
RIN 1010-AD71
Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of Existing Facilities on the
Outer Continental Shelf--Acquire a Lease Noncompetitively
AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement
(BOEMRE), Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule revises BOEMRE regulations that pertain to
noncompetitive acquisition of an Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
renewable energy lease. We are taking this action because under the
current regulations the process for acquiring a lease noncompetitively
that is initiated by an unsolicited request is inconsistent with the
process for acquiring a lease noncompetitively that is initiated by
BOEMRE. By revising regulations which govern the lease acquisition
process starting with submission of an unsolicited request, and
regulations which govern the lease acquisition process starting with
BOEMRE issuance of a Request for Interest (RFI) or a Call for
Information and Nomination (Call), this rulemaking will make the two
processes consistent with each other.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective June 15, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Redding at (703) 787-1219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As originally written, Sec. 285.231 allowed the award of a
noncompetitive lease after BOEMRE received an unsolicited request for a
noncompetitive lease if BOEMRE determined that there was no competitive
interest after publishing a single notice of a request for interest
relating to the unsolicited request for a noncompetitive lease. As
originally written, Sec. 285.232 provided that if BOEMRE published an
RFI or Call resulting in a single expression of interest in a discrete
portion within the RFI or Call area, BOEMRE could offer a lease for
that area through a noncompetitive process only if it also issued a
notice of request for interest as required by Sec. 285.231(b) and
subsequently determined that there was no competitive interest based on
responses to that notice.
BOEMRE believes that the requirement for another notice following
an RFI or Call was redundant and was at odds with the noncompetitive
process prescribed for cases in which a party submitted an unsolicited
request for an OCS renewable energy lease, where BOEMRE is required to
publish only a single notice. The final rule revises Sec. 285.232(c)
to refer to the process outlined in Sec. 285.231(d) through (i) rather
than Sec. 285.231(b) through (i), thereby eliminating this discrepancy
by requiring only one RFI notice for determining competitive interest
in all cases. This will make BOEMRE's leasing processes more
streamlined and efficient while maintaining BOEMRE's obligations to
notify the public of areas that may be leased, to solicit public input
regarding those areas, and to determine whether competitive interest
exists in acquiring leases in those areas.
Comments on the Proposed Rule
BOEMRE published a proposed rule on February 16, 2011 (76 FR 8962),
and received a total of 76 comments.
The Offshore Wind Development Coalition, the National Hydropower
Association, Offshore MW LLC, the American Wind Energy Association, and
the National Wildlife Federation expressed support for revising the
rule as proposed and endorsed BOEMRE's rationale for doing so.
The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound (APNS) and the Oceans
Public Trust Initiative (OPTI) objected to revising the rule and
objected to BOEMRE's rationale. The APNS stated that the proposed rule
would promote a land rush attitude, diminish competition, and
marginalize public review by shortening the environmental review
process for OCS wind developers. The OPTI stated that it appears that
the sole purpose for revising the regulations appears to be to make
leasing move more quickly, which could be at the expense of more
careful and balanced review. The OPTI also stated that revising the
rule as proposed promotes collusion among industry participants.
Defenders of Wildlife did not explicitly offer an opinion in favor of
or in opposition to the proposed rule revision. However, it stated
that, ``In proposing to arbitrarily set a new criteria for an expedited
accelerated permitting process solely on the basis of the number of
applicants for a lease at a particular location, BOEMRE appears to
ignore in this rulemaking any and all parameters that make a particular
location unique * * *.''
BOEMRE received 68 comments from private citizens, 3 that expressed
[[Page 28179]]
support for revising the rule, 55 that expressed opposition (including
50 form letters), and 10 that were not germane to the rulemaking. The
comments supporting the rule revision stated that it will promote more
efficient noncompetitive leasing processes without curtailing public
input and environmental review procedures. The comments opposing the
rule revision asserted that it will reduce or eliminate competition,
thereby promoting an offshore land rush for renewable energy leases,
and will marginalize the public review process.
After reviewing the comments on the proposed rule, BOEMRE has
concluded that there is no compelling reason not to promulgate the
final rule. As we have maintained throughout this rulemaking, the
revision of the regulations will eliminate inefficiency and provide
consistency while preserving adequate opportunity for public notice and
review in BOEMRE noncompetitive leasing processes. The final rule will
have no effect on the environmental review process carried out pursuant
to the requirements in the National Environmental Policy Act. In
response to concerns that the proposed rule will diminish competition,
the final rule will have no effect on competition and is fully
consistent with BOEMRE's obligations under subsection 8(p) of the OCS
Lands Act, as amended, to offer OCS renewable energy leases on a
competitive basis unless we determine, after public notice of a
proposed lease, that there is no competitive interest. BOEMRE leasing
processes under the renewable energy regulatory framework, as revised
by this final rule, will continue to provide for thorough BOEMRE review
of all relevant environmental and cultural criteria, as well as public
participation. Consequently, we believe the final rule will have no
effect whatsoever on potential collusion among offshore renewable
energy developers.
Regulatory Requirements
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This final rule is not a significant rule as defined by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and is not subject to review under E.O.
12866.
(1) This final rule will not have an annual effect of $100 million
or more on the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities.
(2) This final rule will not create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
The final rule will eliminate unnecessary redundancy and inefficiency.
(3) This final rule will not alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or
obligations of their recipients.
(4) This final rule will not raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the
principles set forth in E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The Department prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis for 30 CFR
part 285 and concluded that the regulations will impact a substantial
number of small entities, but will not have a significant economic
impact on the small entities in comparison to the impacts on large
entities. That analysis was discussed in detail in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking for 30 CFR part 285 published in the Federal
Register on July 9, 2008 (73 FR 39376).
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for
the industries affected by this rule is 221119 (Other Electric Power
Generation). The definition for this code is:
``This U.S. industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in
operating electric power generation facilities (except hydroelectric,
fossil fuel, nuclear). These facilities convert other forms of energy,
such as solar, wind, or tidal power, into electrical energy. The
electric energy produced in these establishments is provided to
electric power transmission systems or to electric power distribution
systems.''
It is possible that this final rule could eventually affect
entities that produce hydrogen and fall under NAICS Code 325120
(Industrial Gas Manufacturing). The definition for this code is:
``This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in
manufacturing industrial organic and inorganic gases in compressed,
liquid, or solid forms.''
Given the original findings of the regulatory flexibility analysis
done for 30 CFR part 285, as well as the minor adjustment to the
renewable energy leasing process that is accomplished, this final rule
will not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This final rule is not a major rule under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). This final
rule:
a. Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Will not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The
requirements will apply indiscriminately to entities intending to
acquire a renewable energy lease on the OCS pursuant to 30 CFR part
285.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995
This final rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. The final rule will not have a significant or unique
effect on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) is not required.
Takings Implication Assessment (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this final rule does not have
significant takings implications. The final rule is not a governmental
action capable of interference with constitutionally protected property
rights. A Takings Implication Assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this final rule does not have
federalism implications. This final rule will not substantially and
directly affect the relationship between the Federal and State
Governments. To the extent that State and local governments have a role
in OCS activities, this final rule will not affect that role. A
Federalism Assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This final rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this final rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written
[[Page 28180]]
in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we have evaluated this final rule
and determined that it has no substantial effects on Federally
recognized Indian Tribes.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This final rulemaking does not contain new information collection
requirements; therefore, an OMB submission under the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required. The PRA provides that an agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. Until OMB approves a collection of
information and assigns a control number, you are not required to
respond. The revisions in this final rulemaking refer to, but will not
change, information collection requirements in 30 CFR part 285. The OMB
approved the information collection requirements contained in 30 CFR
part 285 under OMB Control Number 1010-0176 (expiration 3/31/2013).
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
This final rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. BOEMRE
has analyzed this final rule under the criteria of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Department's regulations
implementing NEPA. This final rule meets the criteria set forth at 43
CFR 46.210(i) for a Departmental Categorical Exclusion in that this
final rule is ``* * * of an administrative, financial, legal,
technical, or procedural nature; or whose environmental effects are too
broad, speculative, or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful
analysis * * *.'' Further, BOEMRE has analyzed this final rule to
determine if it meets any of the extraordinary circumstances that will
require an environmental assessment or an environmental impact
statement as set forth in 43 CFR 46.215 and concluded that this final
rule, being purely procedural, does not meet any of the criteria for
extraordinary circumstances.
Data Quality Act
In developing this final rule, BOEMRE did not conduct or use a
study, experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Data
Quality Act (Pub. L. 106-554, app. C Sec. 515, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-
153-154).
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This final rule is not a significant energy action under the
definition in E.O. 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 285
Continental shelf, Environmental protection, Public lands.
Dated: April 28, 2011.
Ned Farquhar,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) amends 30 CFR part 285
as follows:
PART 285--RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING FACILITIES ON
THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
0
1. The authority citation for part 285 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1337.
0
2. Amend Sec. 285.231 by revising the section heading and paragraph
(d)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 285.231 How will BOEMRE process my unsolicited request for a
noncompetitive lease?
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) We will publish in the Federal Register a notice that there is
no competitive interest; and
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 285.232 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 285.232 May I acquire a lease noncompetitively after responding
to a Request for Interest or Call for Information and Nominations under
Sec. 285.213?
* * * * *
(c) After receiving the acquisition fee, BOEMRE will follow the
process outlined in Sec. 285.231(d) through (i).
[FR Doc. 2011-11908 Filed 5-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P