Southwest Health Alliances, Inc., Doing Business as BSA Provider Network; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment, 28226-28228 [2011-11885]
Download as PDF
28226
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Notices
(‘‘Receiver’’). In complying with its
statutory duty to resolve the institution
in the method that is least costly to the
deposit insurance fund (see 12 U.S.C.
1823(c)(4)), the FDIC facilitated a
transaction in which MB Financial
Bank, N.A., Chicago, Illinois, assumed
all of the deposits and a portion of the
assets of the failed institution.
Section 11(d)(11)(A) of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C.
1821(d)(11)(A), sets forth the order of
priority for distribution of amounts
realized from the liquidation or other
resolution of an insured depository
institution to pay claims. Under the
statutory order of priority,
administrative expenses and deposit
liabilities must be paid in full before
any distribution may be made to general
unsecured creditors or any lower
priority claims.
As of December 31, 2010, the value of
assets available for distribution by the
Receiver, together with anticipated
recoveries, was $1,485,477,307. As of
the same date, administrative expenses
and depositor liabilities equaled
$2,599,960,134, exceeding available
assets and potential recoveries by at
least $1,114,482,827. Accordingly, the
FDIC has determined that insufficient
assets exist to make any distribution on
general unsecured creditor claims (and
any lower priority claims) and therefore
all such claims, asserted or unasserted,
will recover nothing and have no value.
Dated: May 11, 2011.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–11890 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 11–08]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Ndahendekire Barbara v. African
Shipping; Njoroge Muhia; Alco
Logistics, Llc; Brenda Alexander; and
AIR 7 Seas Transportlogistics, Inc.;
Notice of Filing of Complaint and
Assignment
Notice is given that a complaint has
been filed with the Federal Maritime
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) by
Ndahendekire Barbara, hereinafter
‘‘Complainant,’’ against African
Shipping; Njoroge Muhia, ALCO
Logistics, LLC; Brenda Alexander; and
Air 7 Seas Transport Logistics, Inc.;
hereinafter ‘‘Respondents’’. Complainant
asserts that she is acting agent for
Ndahendekire Foundation located in
Mbarara, Uganda. Complainant alleges
that: Respondent African Shipping
specializes in international cargo
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
shipping; Respondent Njoroge Muhia is
Chief Executive Officer for African
Shipping; Respondent ALCO Logistics,
LLC, is a freight forwarding and logistics
company; Respondent Brenda
Alexander is an acting agent for ALCO
Logistics, LLC; and Respondent Air 7
Seas Transport Logistics, Inc., is a
freight forwarding company.
Complainant alleges that
Respondents, in connection with the
shipment of two containers and chassis
to Mombasa Kenya, violated Section
10(d)(1) of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C.
41102(c), by ‘‘failing to ensure that Ms.
Barbara[‘s] (sic) container was delivered
safely, securely and on time to the
required destination.’’ Specifically,
Complainant alleges that Respondents
‘‘Mr. Muhia and African Shipping are in
full breach of contract by contracting
with other shippers and not paying the
shippers, allowing the containers and
chassis to be delivered to the wrong
location, not notifying Ms. Barbara of
the delivery, allowing demurrages to
incur, requesting additional payments
for delivery and release of the chassis
and containers.’’ Complainant also
alleges that Respondents thereby caused
‘‘Ms. Barbara additional shipping cost as
well as the loss of her contract for
supplying medical supplies and
equipment.’’
Complainant asks ‘‘that respondent be
required to answer the charges herein;
that after due hearing, an order be made
commanding said respondent (and each
of them); to cease and deist (sic) from
the aforesaid violations of said act(s); to
establish and put in force such practices
as the Commission determines to be
lawful and reasonable; to pay said
complainant by way of reparations for
the unlawful conduct * * * the sum of
One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
and zero cents ($150,000), with interest
and attorney’s fees or such sum as the
Commission may determine to be
proper as an award of reparation; and
that such other and further order or
orders be made as the Commission
determines to be proper in the
premises.’’
This proceeding has been assigned to
the Office of Administrative Law Judges.
Hearing in this matter, if any is held,
shall commence within the time
limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,
and only after consideration has been
given by the parties and the presiding
officer to the use of alternative forms of
dispute resolution. The hearing shall
include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the
presiding officer only upon proper
showing that there are genuine issues of
material fact that cannot be resolved on
the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
depositions, or other documents or that
the nature of the matter in issue is such
that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the
development of an adequate record.
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR
502.61, the initial decision of the
presiding officer in this proceeding shall
be issued by May 9, 2012 and the final
decision of the Commission shall be
issued by September 6, 2012.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–11888 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 091 0013]
Southwest Health Alliances, Inc.,
Doing Business as BSA Provider
Network; Analysis of Agreement
Containing Consent Order To Aid
Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed Consent Agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices or unfair
methods of competition. The attached
Analysis To Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
draft complaint and the terms of the
consent order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Southwest Health, File
No. 091 0013’’ on your comment, and
file your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
southwesthealthalliances, by following
the instructions on the Web-based form.
If you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
P. Wiegand (415–848–5174), FTC,
Western Region, San Francisco, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Notices
Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and § 2.34 the Commission Rules
of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis To Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for May 10, 2011), on the
World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/
os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be
obtained from the FTC Public Reference
Room, Room 130–H, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580,
either in person or by calling (202) 326–
2222.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before June 10, 2011. Write ‘‘Southwest
Health Alliances, File No. 091 0013’’ on
your comment. Your comment—
including your name and your state—
will be placed on the public record of
this proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the public Commission
Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals’ home contact
information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web
site.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment doesn’t
include any sensitive personal
information, like anyone’s Social
Security number, date of birth, driver’s
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment
doesn’t include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, don’t include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is obtained
from any person and which is privileged
or confidential,’’ as provided in Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2).
In particular, don’t include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you have to follow the procedure
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
southwesthealthalliances by following
the instructions on the web-based form.
If this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Southwest Health Alliances, File
No. 091 0013’’ on your comment and on
the envelope, and mail or deliver it to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before June 8 2011. You can find more
information, including routine uses
permitted by the Privacy Act, in the
Commission’s privacy policy, at https://
www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has
accepted, subject to final approval, an
agreement containing a proposed
Consent Order with Southwest Health
Alliances, Inc., dba BSA Provider
Network (‘‘BSA Provider Network’’ or
‘‘Respondent’’). The agreement settles
charges that BSA Provider Network
1 In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must
include the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record. See
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28227
violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45, by fixing
prices charged to those offering coverage
for health care services (‘‘payors’’) in the
Amarillo, Texas, area. The proposed
Consent Order has been placed on the
public record for 30 days to receive
comments from interested persons.
Comments received during this period
will become part of the public record.
After 30 days, the Commission will
review the agreement and the comments
received, and will decide whether it
should withdraw from the agreement or
make the proposed Consent Order final.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed Consent Order. The analysis is
not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the agreement and
proposed Consent Order or to modify
their terms in any way. Further, the
proposed Consent Order has been
entered into for settlement purposes
only and does not constitute an
admission by Respondent that it
violated the law or that the facts alleged
in the Complaint (other than
jurisdictional facts) are true.
The Complaint’s Allegations
BSA Provider Network is a multispecialty independent practice
association consisting of multiple,
independent medical practices with a
total of approximately 900 physician
members, of which approximately 300
are devoted to primary care, in the
Amarillo, Texas, area.
Since at least 2000, BSA Provider
Network has acted to restrain
competition by facilitating, entering
into, and implementing agreements to
fix the prices and other terms at which
it would contract with payers; and to
engage in collective negotiations over
terms and conditions of dealing with
payers.
BSA Provider Network did not engage
in any activity that might justify
collective agreements on the prices its
members would accept for their
services. For example, the physicians in
BSA Provider Network have not
clinically or financially integrated their
practices to create efficiencies sufficient
to justify their acts and practices. The
Respondent’s actions have restrained
price and other forms of competition
among physicians in the Amarillo,
Texas, area and thereby harmed
consumers (including health plans,
employers, and individual consumers)
by increasing the prices for physician
services.
The Proposed Consent Order
The proposed Consent Order is
designed to prevent the continuance
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
28228
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Notices
and recurrence of the illegal conduct
alleged in the complaint while it allows
BSA Provider Network to engage in
legitimate, joint conduct. The proposed
Consent Order does not affect BSA
Provider Network’s activities in
contracting with payers on a capitated
basis.
Paragraph II.A prohibits Respondent
from entering into or facilitating
agreements between or among any
health care providers: (1) To negotiate
on behalf of any physician with payer;
(2) to negotiate with any physician as a
payer; (3) to deal, refuse to deal, or
threaten to refuse to deal with any
payer; (4) regarding any term, condition,
or requirement upon which any
physician deals, or is willing to deal,
with any payer, including, but not
limited to price terms; or (5) not to deal
individually with any payer, or not to
deal with any payer except through BSA
Provider Network.
The other parts of Paragraph II
reinforce these general prohibitions.
Paragraph II.B prohibits Respondent
from facilitating exchanges of
information between health care
providers concerning whether, or on
what terms, to contract with a payer.
Paragraph II.C bars attempts to engage in
any action prohibited by Paragraph II.A
or II.B, and Paragraph II.D proscribes
encouraging, suggesting, advising,
pressuring, inducing, or attempting to
induce any person to engage in any
action that would be prohibited by
Paragraphs II.A through II.C.
As in other Commission orders
addressing health care providers’
collective bargaining with health care
purchasers, certain kinds of agreements
are excluded from the general bar on
joint negotiations. Paragraph II does not
preclude BSA Provider Network from
engaging in conduct that is reasonably
necessary to form or participate in
legitimate ‘‘qualified risk-sharing’’ or
‘‘qualified clinically-integrated’’ joint
arrangements, as defined in the
proposed Consent Order. Also,
Paragraph II would not bar agreements
that only involve physicians who are
part of the same medical group practice,
defined in Paragraph I.B, because it is
intended to reach agreements between
and among independent competitors.
Paragraphs III–VI require BSA
Provider Network to notify the
Commission before it initiates certain
contacts regarding contracts with
payers. Paragraphs III and IV apply to
arrangements under which BSA
Provider Network would be acting as a
messenger on behalf of its member
physicians. Paragraphs V and VI apply
to arrangements under which BSA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 May 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
Provider Network plans to achieve
financial or clinical integration.
Paragraph VII.A requires BSA
Provider Network to send a copy of the
Complaint and Consent Order to its
physician members, its management
and staff, and any payers who
communicated with BSA Provider
Network, or with whom BSA Provider
Network communicated, with regard to
any interest in contracting for physician
services.
Paragraph VII.B allows for contract
termination if a payer voluntarily
submits a request to BSA Provider
Network to terminate its contract.
Pursuant to such a request, Paragraph
VII.B requires BSA Provider Network to
terminate, without penalty, any payer
contracts that they had entered into
since it began its alleged restraint of
trade in 2000. This provision is
intended to eliminate the effects of BSA
Provider Network’s joint price setting
behavior. Paragraph VII.C requires that
BSA Provider Network send a copy of
any payer’s request for termination to
every physician who participates in
each group.
Paragraph VII.D contains notification
provisions relating to future contact
with physicians, payers, management,
and staff. These provisions require BSA
Provider Network to distribute a copy of
the Complaint and Consent Order to
each physician who begins participating
in each group; each payer who contacts
each group regarding the provision of
physician services; and each person
who becomes an officer, director,
manager, or employee for three years
after the date on which the Consent
Order becomes final. In addition,
Paragraph VII.D requires BSA Provider
Network to publish a copy of the
Complaint and Consent Order, for three
years, in any official publication that it
sends to its participating physicians.
Paragraphs VII.E and VIII–IX impose
various obligations on BSA Provider
Network to report or to provide access
to information to the Commission to
facilitate monitoring its compliance
with the Consent Order.
Pursuant to Paragraph X, the
proposed Consent Order will expire 20
years from the date it is issued.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–11885 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[VSI–Notice 2011–01; Docket 2011–0005;
Sequence 11]
Notice Pursuant to Executive Order
12600 of Receipt of Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) Requests for
Access to the Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) Database
General Services
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice provides
submitters notice pursuant to Executive
Order 12600 that the General Services
Administration, Office of
Governmentwide Policy, Acquisition
Systems Division (ASD) has received
several FOIA requests for certain data
elements (CCR extracts) within the
Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
database. This notice describes each
data element contained in CCR, and its
exemption status under FOIA.
The following information applies to
CCR data fields 250 through 254 only,
which are marked with a ‘‘*’’:
Information posted in data fields 250
to 254 prior to April 15, 2011, regardless
of which Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) provision or clause it is posted
under, will be subject to release in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act procedures at 5 U.S.C.
552, including, where appropriate,
procedures promulgated under E.O.
12600, ‘‘Predisclosure Notification
Procedures for Confidential Commercial
Information.’’
Information posted in data fields 250
to 254 (or subsequently on the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)), on or
after April 15, 2011, will be available to
the public, as required by Section 3010
of Public Law 111–212 (see 41 U.S.C.
417b, as codified, 41 U.S.C. 2313) and
in accordance with FAR clause 52.209–
9 (version dated JAN 2011).
Federal contractors must NOT post
information required under FAR clause
52.209–7 (version dated JAN 2011) on or
after April 15, 2011. Any contractors
with a contract containing clause
52.209–7 (version dated JAN 2011) that
requires update of information on or
after April 15, 2011, should contact
their contracting officer immediately to
discuss a modification.
The following information applies to
CCR data fields 255 through 260, which
are marked with ‘‘**’’:
Any information entered in data fields
255 to 260 before April 15, 2011, is only
available to authorized individuals in
accordance with the Freedom of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28226-28228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11885]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 091 0013]
Southwest Health Alliances, Inc., Doing Business as BSA Provider
Network; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public
Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis To
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent
agreement--that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Southwest Health, File
No. 091 0013'' on your comment, and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/southwesthealthalliances, by following
the instructions on the Web-based form. If you prefer to file your
comment on paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113
(Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John P. Wiegand (415-848-5174), FTC,
Western Region, San Francisco, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade
[[Page 28227]]
Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Sec. 2.34 the
Commission Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that
the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to
cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a
period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis To Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page
(for May 10, 2011), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before June 10, 2011.
Write ``Southwest Health Alliances, File No. 091 0013'' on your
comment. Your comment--including your name and your state--will be
placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the
extent practicable, on the public Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the
Commission tries to remove individuals' home contact information from
comments before placing them on the Commission Web site.
Because your comment will be made public, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your comment doesn't include any
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number,
date of birth, driver's license number or other state identification
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your comment doesn't include any
sensitive health information, like medical records or other
individually identifiable health information. In addition, don't
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information
which is obtained from any person and which is privileged or
confidential,'' as provided in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, don't
include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales
statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\ Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and
legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions
of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule
4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/southwesthealthalliances by following the instructions on the web-
based form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper, write ``Southwest Health
Alliances, File No. 091 0013'' on your comment and on the envelope, and
mail or deliver it to the following address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to
the Commission by courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that
it receives on or before June 8 2011. You can find more information,
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the
Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final
approval, an agreement containing a proposed Consent Order with
Southwest Health Alliances, Inc., dba BSA Provider Network (``BSA
Provider Network'' or ``Respondent''). The agreement settles charges
that BSA Provider Network violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45, by fixing prices charged to those
offering coverage for health care services (``payors'') in the
Amarillo, Texas, area. The proposed Consent Order has been placed on
the public record for 30 days to receive comments from interested
persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the
public record. After 30 days, the Commission will review the agreement
and the comments received, and will decide whether it should withdraw
from the agreement or make the proposed Consent Order final.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed Consent Order. The analysis is not intended to constitute an
official interpretation of the agreement and proposed Consent Order or
to modify their terms in any way. Further, the proposed Consent Order
has been entered into for settlement purposes only and does not
constitute an admission by Respondent that it violated the law or that
the facts alleged in the Complaint (other than jurisdictional facts)
are true.
The Complaint's Allegations
BSA Provider Network is a multi-specialty independent practice
association consisting of multiple, independent medical practices with
a total of approximately 900 physician members, of which approximately
300 are devoted to primary care, in the Amarillo, Texas, area.
Since at least 2000, BSA Provider Network has acted to restrain
competition by facilitating, entering into, and implementing agreements
to fix the prices and other terms at which it would contract with
payers; and to engage in collective negotiations over terms and
conditions of dealing with payers.
BSA Provider Network did not engage in any activity that might
justify collective agreements on the prices its members would accept
for their services. For example, the physicians in BSA Provider Network
have not clinically or financially integrated their practices to create
efficiencies sufficient to justify their acts and practices. The
Respondent's actions have restrained price and other forms of
competition among physicians in the Amarillo, Texas, area and thereby
harmed consumers (including health plans, employers, and individual
consumers) by increasing the prices for physician services.
The Proposed Consent Order
The proposed Consent Order is designed to prevent the continuance
[[Page 28228]]
and recurrence of the illegal conduct alleged in the complaint while it
allows BSA Provider Network to engage in legitimate, joint conduct. The
proposed Consent Order does not affect BSA Provider Network's
activities in contracting with payers on a capitated basis.
Paragraph II.A prohibits Respondent from entering into or
facilitating agreements between or among any health care providers: (1)
To negotiate on behalf of any physician with payer; (2) to negotiate
with any physician as a payer; (3) to deal, refuse to deal, or threaten
to refuse to deal with any payer; (4) regarding any term, condition, or
requirement upon which any physician deals, or is willing to deal, with
any payer, including, but not limited to price terms; or (5) not to
deal individually with any payer, or not to deal with any payer except
through BSA Provider Network.
The other parts of Paragraph II reinforce these general
prohibitions. Paragraph II.B prohibits Respondent from facilitating
exchanges of information between health care providers concerning
whether, or on what terms, to contract with a payer. Paragraph II.C
bars attempts to engage in any action prohibited by Paragraph II.A or
II.B, and Paragraph II.D proscribes encouraging, suggesting, advising,
pressuring, inducing, or attempting to induce any person to engage in
any action that would be prohibited by Paragraphs II.A through II.C.
As in other Commission orders addressing health care providers'
collective bargaining with health care purchasers, certain kinds of
agreements are excluded from the general bar on joint negotiations.
Paragraph II does not preclude BSA Provider Network from engaging in
conduct that is reasonably necessary to form or participate in
legitimate ``qualified risk-sharing'' or ``qualified clinically-
integrated'' joint arrangements, as defined in the proposed Consent
Order. Also, Paragraph II would not bar agreements that only involve
physicians who are part of the same medical group practice, defined in
Paragraph I.B, because it is intended to reach agreements between and
among independent competitors.
Paragraphs III-VI require BSA Provider Network to notify the
Commission before it initiates certain contacts regarding contracts
with payers. Paragraphs III and IV apply to arrangements under which
BSA Provider Network would be acting as a messenger on behalf of its
member physicians. Paragraphs V and VI apply to arrangements under
which BSA Provider Network plans to achieve financial or clinical
integration.
Paragraph VII.A requires BSA Provider Network to send a copy of the
Complaint and Consent Order to its physician members, its management
and staff, and any payers who communicated with BSA Provider Network,
or with whom BSA Provider Network communicated, with regard to any
interest in contracting for physician services.
Paragraph VII.B allows for contract termination if a payer
voluntarily submits a request to BSA Provider Network to terminate its
contract. Pursuant to such a request, Paragraph VII.B requires BSA
Provider Network to terminate, without penalty, any payer contracts
that they had entered into since it began its alleged restraint of
trade in 2000. This provision is intended to eliminate the effects of
BSA Provider Network's joint price setting behavior. Paragraph VII.C
requires that BSA Provider Network send a copy of any payer's request
for termination to every physician who participates in each group.
Paragraph VII.D contains notification provisions relating to future
contact with physicians, payers, management, and staff. These
provisions require BSA Provider Network to distribute a copy of the
Complaint and Consent Order to each physician who begins participating
in each group; each payer who contacts each group regarding the
provision of physician services; and each person who becomes an
officer, director, manager, or employee for three years after the date
on which the Consent Order becomes final. In addition, Paragraph VII.D
requires BSA Provider Network to publish a copy of the Complaint and
Consent Order, for three years, in any official publication that it
sends to its participating physicians.
Paragraphs VII.E and VIII-IX impose various obligations on BSA
Provider Network to report or to provide access to information to the
Commission to facilitate monitoring its compliance with the Consent
Order.
Pursuant to Paragraph X, the proposed Consent Order will expire 20
years from the date it is issued.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-11885 Filed 5-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P