Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision, 28125-28127 [2011-11792]
Download as PDF
28125
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Notices
Brief Description of Projects Approved
for Collection and Use:
Asphalt pavement replacement-runway
19/1.
Construct taxiway A extension.
Rehabilitate taxiway B2, north end of
taxiway B, taxiway C, and taxiway E1.
General aviation connector taxiway and
site development of north terminal.
Terminal entrance walkways.
General aviation taxiways 4 and 5
shoulder edge lights.
Implementation and administrative
costs for PFC no. 8, amendment No.
1 to PFC No. 7, and amendment No.
2 to PFC No. 6.
Environmental assessment north
development.
Surface painted holding position signs.
Two valet bag belt systems.
Airport operations area obstruction
survey.
Closed circuit television system
replacement.
Interactive employee training upgrade.
Pre-conditioned air hose upgrade (five
boarding bridges).
Brief Description of Projects Partially
Approved for Collection and Use: Public
address system replacement.
Determination: The approval is
limited to that portion of the project
needed to make required automatic
security announcements and to feed
these announcements into the public
address system.
Lighting and reseal joints to runways:
Add two airport operations area access
gates; and replace failed taxiways and
ramp concrete paving slabs.
Determination: The approval is
limited to the cost associated with the
runway lights. The public agency failed
to provide any justification for the other
project components.
Brief Description of Projects Approved
for Collection:
Site mitigation.
Realign and construct Gulfstream Road/
tunnel construction.
Taxiway A extension northconstruction.
Electrical vault.
Taxiway H construction.
Storm water update.
Gulfstream Road/tunnel design.
Taxiway A design.
Taxiway H design.
Airfield electrical vault design.
Decision Date: March 17, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Marshall, Atlanta Airports District
Office, (404) 305–7153.
AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS
Amendment
approved date
Amendment No., city, state
04–07–C–04–JNU Juneau, AK ............................................
09–05–C–01–BRO Brownsville, TX .....................................
02–06–C–10–MSY New Orleans, LA ..................................
06–08–C–02–MSY New Orleans, LA ..................................
09–10–C–02–MSY New Orleans, LA ..................................
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2011.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger
Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2011–11574 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2011–0024]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice of final disposition.
FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 16 individuals from
the vision requirement in the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). The exemptions will enable
these individuals to operate commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate
commerce without meeting the
prescribed vision standard. The Agency
has concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
02/25/11
03/03/11
03/11/11
03/11/11
03/11/11
Original
approved net
PFC revenue
$3,566,606
3,055,366
287,977,095
1,023,858
52,805,580
level of safety maintained without the
exemptions for these CMV drivers.
DATES: The exemptions are effective
May 13, 2011. The exemptions expire
on May 13, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
FDMS is available 24 hours each day,
365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Amended
approved net
PFC revenue
$3,575,162
3,485,972
293,951,336
1,000,000
40,592,406
Original estimated charge
exp. date
Amended estimated charge
exp. date
03/01/08
07/01/18
12/01/19
10/01/18
06/01/26
03/01/08
04/01/20
06/01/20
07/01/25
02/01/26
comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or of the person signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s Privacy Act
Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register on January 17,
2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/
E8–785.pdf.
Background
On March 29, 2011, FMCSA
published a notice of receipt of
exemption applications from certain
individuals, and requested comments
from the public (76 FR 17481). That
notice listed 16 applicants’ case
histories. The 16 individuals applied for
exemptions from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
28126
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period.
Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the
16 applications on their merits and
made a determination to grant
exemptions to each of them.
Vision and Driving Experience of the
Applicants
The vision requirement in the
FMCSRs provides:
A person is physically qualified to
drive a commercial motor vehicle if that
person has distant visual acuity of at
least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye
without corrective lenses or visual
acuity separately corrected to 20/40
(Snellen) or better with corrective
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least
20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or
without corrective lenses, field of vision
of at least 70° in the horizontal meridian
in each eye, and the ability to recognize
the colors of traffic signals and devices
showing standard red, green, and amber
(49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)).
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers
do not meet the vision standard, but
have adapted their driving to
accommodate their vision limitation
and demonstrated their ability to drive
safely. The 16 exemption applicants
listed in this notice are in this category.
They are unable to meet the vision
standard in one eye for various reasons,
including amblyopia, complete loss of
vision, optic atrophy, macular scar,
macular degeneration, cataract, retinal
detachment and prosthesis. In most
cases, their eye conditions were not
recently developed. 10 of the applicants
were either born with their vision
impairments or have had them since
childhood. The 6 individuals who
sustained their vision conditions as
adults have had them for periods
ranging from 13 to 40 years.
Although each applicant has one eye
which does not meet the vision standard
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at
least 20/40 corrected vision in the other
eye, and in a doctor’s opinion, has
sufficient vision to perform all the tasks
necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors’
opinions are supported by the
applicants’ possession of valid
commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) or
non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to
knowledge and skills tests designed to
evaluate their qualifications to operate a
CMV.
All of these applicants satisfied the
testing standards for their State of
residence. By meeting State licensing
requirements, the applicants
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
demonstrated their ability to operate a
commercial vehicle, with their limited
vision, to the satisfaction of the State.
While possessing a valid CDL or nonCDL, these 16 drivers have been
authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate
commerce, even though their vision
disqualified them from driving in
interstate commerce. They have driven
CMVs with their limited vision for
careers ranging from 2 to 58 years. In the
past 3 years, two of the drivers were
involved in crashes or convicted of
moving violations in a CMV.
The qualifications, experience, and
medical condition of each applicant
were stated and discussed in detail in
the March 29, 2011 notice (76 FR
17481).
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the vision standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely
to achieve an equivalent or greater level
of safety than would be achieved
without the exemption. Without the
exemption, applicants will continue to
be restricted to intrastate driving. With
the exemption, applicants can drive in
interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis
focuses on whether an equal or greater
level of safety is likely to be achieved by
permitting each of these drivers to drive
in interstate commerce as opposed to
restricting him or her to driving in
intrastate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered not only the medical reports
about the applicants’ vision, but also
their driving records and experience
with the vision deficiency.
To qualify for an exemption from the
vision standard, FMCSA requires a
person to present verifiable evidence
that he/she has driven a commercial
vehicle safely with the vision deficiency
for the past 3 years. Recent driving
performance is especially important in
evaluating future safety, according to
several research studies designed to
correlate past and future driving
performance. Results of these studies
support the principle that the best
predictor of future performance by a
driver is his/her past record of crashes
and traffic violations. Copies of the
studies may be found at Docket Number
FMCSA–1998–3637.
We believe we can properly apply the
principle to monocular drivers, because
data from the Federal Highway
Administration’s (FHWA) former waiver
study program clearly demonstrate the
driving performance of experienced
monocular drivers in the program is
better than that of all CMV drivers
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345,
March 26, 1996). The fact that
experienced monocular drivers
demonstrated safe driving records in the
waiver program supports a conclusion
that other monocular drivers, meeting
the same qualifying conditions as those
required by the waiver program, are also
likely to have adapted to their vision
deficiency and will continue to operate
safely.
The first major research correlating
past and future performance was done
in England by Greenwood and Yule in
1920. Subsequent studies, building on
that model, concluded that crash rates
for the same individual exposed to
certain risks for two different time
periods vary only slightly (See Bates
and Neyman, University of California
Publications in Statistics, April 1952).
Other studies demonstrated theories of
predicting crash proneness from crash
history coupled with other factors.
These factors—such as age, sex,
geographic location, mileage driven and
conviction history—are used every day
by insurance companies and motor
vehicle bureaus to predict the
probability of an individual
experiencing future crashes (See Weber,
Donald C., ‘‘Accident Rate Potential: An
Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,’’ Journal
of American Statistical Association,
June 1971). A 1964 California Driver
Record Study prepared by the California
Department of Motor Vehicles
concluded that the best overall crash
predictor for both concurrent and
nonconcurrent events is the number of
single convictions. This study used 3
consecutive years of data, comparing the
experiences of drivers in the first 2 years
with their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these
studies to the past 3-year record of the
16 applicants, one of the applicants was
convicted for moving violations and one
of the applicants was involved in a
crash. All the applicants achieved a
record of safety while driving with their
vision impairment, demonstrating the
likelihood that they have adapted their
driving skills to accommodate their
condition. As the applicants’ ample
driving histories with their vision
deficiencies are good predictors of
future performance, FMCSA concludes
their ability to drive safely can be
projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants’
intrastate driving experience and history
provide an adequate basis for predicting
their ability to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Intrastate driving, like
interstate operations, involves
substantial driving on highways on the
interstate system and on other roads
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Notices
built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas
exposes the driver to more pedestrian
and vehicular traffic than exists on
interstate highways. Faster reaction to
traffic and traffic signals is generally
required because distances between
them are more compact. These
conditions tax visual capacity and
driver response just as intensely as
interstate driving conditions. The
veteran drivers in this proceeding have
operated CMVs safely under those
conditions for at least 3 years, most for
much longer. Their experience and
driving records lead us to believe that
each applicant is capable of operating in
interstate commerce as safely as he/she
has been performing in intrastate
commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds
that exempting these applicants from
the vision standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption. For this reason, the
Agency is granting the exemptions for
the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to the 16 applicants
listed in the notice of March 29, 2011
(76 FR 17481).
We recognize that the vision of an
applicant may change and affect his/her
ability to operate a CMV as safely as in
the past. As a condition of the
exemption, therefore, FMCSA will
impose requirements on the 16
individuals consistent with the
grandfathering provisions applied to
drivers who participated in the
Agency’s vision waiver program.
Those requirements are found at 49
CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following: (1) That each individual be
physically examined every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who
attests that the vision in the better eye
continues to meet the standard in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10), and (b) by a medical
examiner who attests that the individual
is otherwise physically qualified under
49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (3) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:22 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this
proceeding. The comment was
considered and discussed below.
The Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation is in favor of granting a
Federal vision exemption to David
Kibble, they indicated that they have
reviewed the driving histories of this
applicant and have no objections to
FMCSA granting him a vision
exemption.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 16
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts, David W. Bennett, Toby L.
Carson, Fredrick M. DeHoff, Jr., Raul
Donozo, Rick A. Ervin, Clifford D.
Johnson, Dionicio Mendoza, David
Kibble, Raymond J. Paiz, Tyler R.
Peebles, Alfredo Reyes, Ronald M.
Robinson, J. Bernando Rodriguez,
Esequiel Rodriguez, Jr., David I. Sosby
and Donald E. Stone from the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
subject to the requirements cited above
(49 CFR 391.64(b)).
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each exemption will be valid
for 2 years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the
end of the 2-year period, the person may
apply to FMCSA for a renewal under
procedures in effect at that time.
Issued on: May 9, 2011.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–11792 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2010–0162]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of title 49
of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the
public notice that by a document dated
October 15, 2010, the Union Pacific
Railroad Company (UP), has petitioned
the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) for a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of the Federal
railroad safety regulations contained at
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28127
Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) part 231 (Safety Appliance
Standards). FRA assigned the petition
Docket Number FRA–2010–0162.
Specifically § 231.24(b)(3) End
platforms (3) Location. One (1) on each
end of car not more than eight (8) inches
above center sill. UP requests relief on
cars where the dimensional
requirements of eight inches above the
center sill are not in compliance and
contend all other measurements are in
compliance within Plate ‘‘U’’ of
Appendix D of the Motive Power and
Equipment Compliance Manual.
UP stated twenty-one different car
owners are affected by this requirement
with the potential of exceeding 18,000
cars that are involved to correct the
problem for cars constructed in 49 CFR
231.24. UP contends that in order to
correct the problem, many cars require
extensive modifications which are time
consuming and labor intensive.
Additionally, UP stated that private car
owners are concerned with service
delays associated with the necessary car
modifications and repairs. In addition,
UP believes its review of safety and
personal injury records indicated no
underlying safety issues that would
prevent the requested provided relief.
UP states that other dimensional
requirements for end platforms cover
other cars beyond 49 CFR 231.24(b)(3).
UP respectfully restates the waiver
request to grant relief from the
provisions of 49 CFR 231 Safety
Appliance Standards with reference to
end platforms be not more than eight
inches above the car center sill.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
https://www.regulations.gov and in
person at the Department of
Transportation’s Docket Operations
Facility, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Operations Facility is open from
9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28125-28127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11792]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2011-0024]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 16 individuals from the
vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce without meeting
the prescribed vision standard. The Agency has concluded that granting
these exemptions will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to,
or greater than, the level of safety maintained without the exemptions
for these CMV drivers.
DATES: The exemptions are effective May 13, 2011. The exemptions expire
on May 13, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64-224, Washington,
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 365
days each year. If you want acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register on January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
Background
On March 29, 2011, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of exemption
applications from certain individuals, and requested comments from the
public (76 FR 17481). That notice listed 16 applicants' case histories.
The 16 individuals applied for exemptions from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety
[[Page 28126]]
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the Agency to
renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. Accordingly, FMCSA
has evaluated the 16 applications on their merits and made a
determination to grant exemptions to each of them.
Vision and Driving Experience of the Applicants
The vision requirement in the FMCSRs provides:
A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor
vehicle if that person has distant visual acuity of at least 20/40
(Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or visual acuity
separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with corrective
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen) in both
eyes with or without corrective lenses, field of vision of at least
70[deg] in the horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability to
recognize the colors of traffic signals and devices showing standard
red, green, and amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)).
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision standard,
but have adapted their driving to accommodate their vision limitation
and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The 16 exemption
applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They are unable
to meet the vision standard in one eye for various reasons, including
amblyopia, complete loss of vision, optic atrophy, macular scar,
macular degeneration, cataract, retinal detachment and prosthesis. In
most cases, their eye conditions were not recently developed. 10 of the
applicants were either born with their vision impairments or have had
them since childhood. The 6 individuals who sustained their vision
conditions as adults have had them for periods ranging from 13 to 40
years.
Although each applicant has one eye which does not meet the vision
standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at least 20/40 corrected
vision in the other eye, and in a doctor's opinion, has sufficient
vision to perform all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors'
opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of valid
commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to knowledge and skills tests
designed to evaluate their qualifications to operate a CMV.
All of these applicants satisfied the testing standards for their
State of residence. By meeting State licensing requirements, the
applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a commercial vehicle,
with their limited vision, to the satisfaction of the State. While
possessing a valid CDL or non-CDL, these 16 drivers have been
authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate commerce, even though their
vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. They have
driven CMVs with their limited vision for careers ranging from 2 to 58
years. In the past 3 years, two of the drivers were involved in crashes
or convicted of moving violations in a CMV.
The qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each
applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the March 29, 2011
notice (76 FR 17481).
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is
likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would
be achieved without the exemption. Without the exemption, applicants
will continue to be restricted to intrastate driving. With the
exemption, applicants can drive in interstate commerce. Thus, our
analysis focuses on whether an equal or greater level of safety is
likely to be achieved by permitting each of these drivers to drive in
interstate commerce as opposed to restricting him or her to driving in
intrastate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered not only the medical reports about the applicants' vision,
but also their driving records and experience with the vision
deficiency.
To qualify for an exemption from the vision standard, FMCSA
requires a person to present verifiable evidence that he/she has driven
a commercial vehicle safely with the vision deficiency for the past 3
years. Recent driving performance is especially important in evaluating
future safety, according to several research studies designed to
correlate past and future driving performance. Results of these studies
support the principle that the best predictor of future performance by
a driver is his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations.
Copies of the studies may be found at Docket Number FMCSA-1998-3637.
We believe we can properly apply the principle to monocular
drivers, because data from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA)
former waiver study program clearly demonstrate the driving performance
of experienced monocular drivers in the program is better than that of
all CMV drivers collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, March 26, 1996).
The fact that experienced monocular drivers demonstrated safe driving
records in the waiver program supports a conclusion that other
monocular drivers, meeting the same qualifying conditions as those
required by the waiver program, are also likely to have adapted to
their vision deficiency and will continue to operate safely.
The first major research correlating past and future performance
was done in England by Greenwood and Yule in 1920. Subsequent studies,
building on that model, concluded that crash rates for the same
individual exposed to certain risks for two different time periods vary
only slightly (See Bates and Neyman, University of California
Publications in Statistics, April 1952). Other studies demonstrated
theories of predicting crash proneness from crash history coupled with
other factors. These factors--such as age, sex, geographic location,
mileage driven and conviction history--are used every day by insurance
companies and motor vehicle bureaus to predict the probability of an
individual experiencing future crashes (See Weber, Donald C.,
``Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,'' Journal of American Statistical
Association, June 1971). A 1964 California Driver Record Study prepared
by the California Department of Motor Vehicles concluded that the best
overall crash predictor for both concurrent and nonconcurrent events is
the number of single convictions. This study used 3 consecutive years
of data, comparing the experiences of drivers in the first 2 years with
their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these studies to the past 3-year record of
the 16 applicants, one of the applicants was convicted for moving
violations and one of the applicants was involved in a crash. All the
applicants achieved a record of safety while driving with their vision
impairment, demonstrating the likelihood that they have adapted their
driving skills to accommodate their condition. As the applicants' ample
driving histories with their vision deficiencies are good predictors of
future performance, FMCSA concludes their ability to drive safely can
be projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and
history provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive
safely in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate
operations, involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate
system and on other roads
[[Page 28127]]
built to interstate standards. Moreover, driving in congested urban
areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian and vehicular traffic than
exists on interstate highways. Faster reaction to traffic and traffic
signals is generally required because distances between them are more
compact. These conditions tax visual capacity and driver response just
as intensely as interstate driving conditions. The veteran drivers in
this proceeding have operated CMVs safely under those conditions for at
least 3 years, most for much longer. Their experience and driving
records lead us to believe that each applicant is capable of operating
in interstate commerce as safely as he/she has been performing in
intrastate commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds that exempting these
applicants from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is likely
to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption. For this reason, the Agency is granting the exemptions for
the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to the 16
applicants listed in the notice of March 29, 2011 (76 FR 17481).
We recognize that the vision of an applicant may change and affect
his/her ability to operate a CMV as safely as in the past. As a
condition of the exemption, therefore, FMCSA will impose requirements
on the 16 individuals consistent with the grandfathering provisions
applied to drivers who participated in the Agency's vision waiver
program.
Those requirements are found at 49 CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following: (1) That each individual be physically examined every year
(a) by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in
the better eye continues to meet the standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is
otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each
individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's
report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical
examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's
qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification
file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must also have a copy of
the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement official.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this proceeding. The comment was
considered and discussed below.
The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation is in favor of
granting a Federal vision exemption to David Kibble, they indicated
that they have reviewed the driving histories of this applicant and
have no objections to FMCSA granting him a vision exemption.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 16 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts, David W. Bennett, Toby L. Carson, Fredrick M. DeHoff, Jr.,
Raul Donozo, Rick A. Ervin, Clifford D. Johnson, Dionicio Mendoza,
David Kibble, Raymond J. Paiz, Tyler R. Peebles, Alfredo Reyes, Ronald
M. Robinson, J. Bernando Rodriguez, Esequiel Rodriguez, Jr., David I.
Sosby and Donald E. Stone from the vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR
391.64(b)).
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption
will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the
terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted
in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the
goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in
effect at that time.
Issued on: May 9, 2011.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-11792 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P