Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Severn River, Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD, 27890-27892 [2011-11729]
Download as PDF
27890
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
assumptions in effect for May 2011,
these interest assumptions are
unchanged.
PBGC has determined that notice and
public comment on this amendment are
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This finding is based on the
need to determine and issue new
interest assumptions promptly so that
the assumptions can reflect current
market conditions as accurately as
possible.
Because of the need to provide
immediate guidance for the payment of
benefits under plans with valuation
dates during June 2011, PBGC finds that
good cause exists for making the
assumptions set forth in this
Rate set
For plans with a valuation
date
On or after
*
Before
amendment effective less than 30 days
after publication.
PBGC has determined that this action
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action″
under the criteria set forth in Executive
Order 12866.
Because no general notice of proposed
rulemaking is required for this
amendment, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980 does not apply. See 5 U.S.C.
601(2).
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4022
Employee benefit plans, Pension
insurance, Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, 29
CFR part 4022 is amended as follows:
7–1–11
3. In appendix C to part 4022, Rate Set
212, as set forth below, is added to the
table.
On or after
*
Before
*
212
[FR Doc. 2011–11846 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
2.50
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Severn River, Spa Creek and
Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing special local regulations
SUMMARY:
15:13 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
*
*
*
*
n1
*
*
4.00
n2
*
7
8
n1
n2
*
Deferred annuities
(percent)
i1
i2
*
4.00
4.00
i3
*
during the swim segment of the
‘‘TriRock Annapolis″ triathlon, a marine
event to be held on the waters of Spa
Creek and Annapolis Harbor on May 14,
2011. These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to temporarily
restrict vessel traffic in a portion of Spa
Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the
event.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2011–0046 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2011–0046 in the ‘‘Keyword″ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.″ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
ADDRESSES:
[USCG–2011–0046; 1625–AA08]
*
4.00
This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
until 9 a.m. on May 14, 2011.
33 CFR Part 100
Appendix B to Part 4022—Lump Sum
Interest Rates for PBGC Payments
i3
DATES:
Coast Guard
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
Immediate
annuity rate
(percent)
7–1–11
Issued in Washington, DC, on this 10th day
of May 2011.
Laricke Blanchard,
Deputy Director for Policy, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION:
*
*
6–1–11
2. In appendix B to part 4022, Rate Set
212, as set forth below, is added to the
table.
■
Appendix C to Part 4022—Lump Sum
Interest Rates for Private-Sector
Payments
*
For plans with a valuation
date
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302, 1322, 1322b,
1341(c)(3)(D), and 1344.
i2
*
4.00
2.50
■
Rate set
i1
*
6–1–11
1. The authority citation for part 4022
continues to read as follows:
■
Deferred annuities
(percent)
Immediate
annuity rate
(percent)
*
212
PART 4022—BENEFITS PAYABLE IN
TERMINATED SINGLE-EMPLOYER
PLANS
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
4.00
*
7
8
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald Houck,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD;
telephone 410–576–2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 17, 2011, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ‘‘Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; Severn
River, Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor,
Annapolis, MD″ in the Federal Register
(76 FR 33). We received no comments
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect life, property and
the environment against the hazards
associated with vessels operating in the
immediate vicinity of a large group of
swimmers on confined navigable
waters. Such hazards include injuries or
death caused by vessel strikes and
navigational obstructions and hazards
caused by swimmers in the navigable
channel. Delaying this already-planned
and already-announced event to
accommodate a 30-day delayed effective
date is contrary to the public interest. In
addition, during the 30-day comment
period on the proposed rule, no
comments were received. Delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
regulated area’s intended objectives of
protecting persons and vessels involved
in the event, and enhancing public and
maritime safety.
Basis and Purpose
On Saturday, May 14, 2011,
Competitor Group Inc. of San Diego,
California, will sponsor the ‘‘TriRock
Annapolis″ triathlon in Annapolis,
Maryland. The swim segment of the
event will occur from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and will be located in Spa Creek and
Annapolis Harbor. Up to 2,000
swimmers will operate on a 500-meter
course located between the Annapolis
City Dock and the confluence of the Spa
Creek with the Severn River. The
swimmers will be supported by
sponsor-provided watercraft. The start
and finish will be located at the
Annapolis City Dock. A portion of the
swim course will impede the federal
navigation channel. Due to the need for
vessel control during the event, the
Coast Guard will temporarily restrict
vessel traffic in the event area to provide
for the safety of participants, spectators
and other transiting vessels.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none
was held.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
27891
Regulatory Planning and Review
Assistance for Small Entities
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders.
Although this regulation will prevent
traffic from transiting a portion of the
Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during
the event, the effect of this regulation
will not be significant due to the limited
duration that the regulated area will be
in effect and the extensive advance
notifications that will be made to the
maritime community via the Local
Notice to Mariners and marine
information broadcasts, so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities″ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the affected portions of the Spa Creek
and Annapolis Harbor during the event.
Although this regulation prevents
traffic from transiting a portion of the
Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during
the event, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: Though the
regulated area extends across the entire
width of the waterway, this proposed
rule would be in effect for only a limited
period; and before the enforcement
period, we will issue maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly. All Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this regulated area can
be contacted on marine band radio
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
27892
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action″ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action″
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule
involves implementation of regulations
within 33 CFR Part 100 applicable to
organized marine events on the
navigable waters of the United States
that could negatively impact the safety
of waterway users and shore side
activities in the event area. The category
of water activities includes but is not
limited to sail boat regattas, boat
parades, power boat racing, swimming
events, crew racing, canoe and sail
board racing. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
38°58′21″ N, longitude 076°28′26″ W.
All coordinates reference Datum NAD
1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated
by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The
Coast Guard Patrol Commander may
forbid and control the movement of all
vessels and persons in the regulated
area. When hailed or signaled by an
official patrol vessel, a vessel or person
in the regulated area shall immediately
comply with the directions given.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion
from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
(2) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this regulated area can be contacted on
marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz).
(3) The Coast Guard will publish a
notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District
Local Notice to Mariners and issue a
marine information broadcast on VHF–
FM marine band radio announcing
specific event date and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section
will be enforced from 6 a.m. until 9 a.m.
on May 14, 2011.
Dated: April 20, 2011.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2011–11729 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary section, § 100.35–
T05–0046 to read as follows:
■
§ 100.35–T05–0046 Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; Severn
River, Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor,
Annapolis, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following
location is a regulated area: All waters
of the Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor,
within lines connecting the following
positions: from position latitude
38°58′34″ N, longitude 076°29′05″ W,
thence to position latitude 38°58′27″ N,
longitude 076°28′55″ W, and from
position latitude 38°58′53″ N, longitude
076°28′34″ W to position latitude
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0160]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Allegheny
River, Pittsburgh, PA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary special local
regulation from the Point State Park
(mile marker 0.0) to the River Rescue
station (mile marker 0.5) on the
Allegheny River, extending 200 feet out
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27890-27892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11729]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[USCG-2011-0046; 1625-AA08]
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Severn River, Spa
Creek and Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing special local regulations
during the swim segment of the ``TriRock Annapolis'' triathlon, a
marine event to be held on the waters of Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor
on May 14, 2011. These special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to temporarily restrict vessel traffic in a
portion of Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. until 9 a.m. on May 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2011-0046 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0046 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, MD; telephone 410-576-2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 17, 2011, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Severn
River, Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD'' in the Federal
Register (76 FR 33). We received no comments
[[Page 27891]]
on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was
held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life,
property and the environment against the hazards associated with
vessels operating in the immediate vicinity of a large group of
swimmers on confined navigable waters. Such hazards include injuries or
death caused by vessel strikes and navigational obstructions and
hazards caused by swimmers in the navigable channel. Delaying this
already-planned and already-announced event to accommodate a 30-day
delayed effective date is contrary to the public interest. In addition,
during the 30-day comment period on the proposed rule, no comments were
received. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
regulated area's intended objectives of protecting persons and vessels
involved in the event, and enhancing public and maritime safety.
Basis and Purpose
On Saturday, May 14, 2011, Competitor Group Inc. of San Diego,
California, will sponsor the ``TriRock Annapolis'' triathlon in
Annapolis, Maryland. The swim segment of the event will occur from 7
a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and will be located in Spa Creek and Annapolis
Harbor. Up to 2,000 swimmers will operate on a 500-meter course located
between the Annapolis City Dock and the confluence of the Spa Creek
with the Severn River. The swimmers will be supported by sponsor-
provided watercraft. The start and finish will be located at the
Annapolis City Dock. A portion of the swim course will impede the
federal navigation channel. Due to the need for vessel control during
the event, the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in
the event area to provide for the safety of participants, spectators
and other transiting vessels.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none was held.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
Although this regulation will prevent traffic from transiting a
portion of the Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the event, the
effect of this regulation will not be significant due to the limited
duration that the regulated area will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made to the maritime community via
the Local Notice to Mariners and marine information broadcasts, so
mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the affected portions of the Spa Creek and
Annapolis Harbor during the event.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of the Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the event, this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: Though the regulated area extends
across the entire width of the waterway, this proposed rule would be in
effect for only a limited period; and before the enforcement period, we
will issue maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can
be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
[[Page 27892]]
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction. This rule involves implementation of regulations
within 33 CFR Part 100 applicable to organized marine events on the
navigable waters of the United States that could negatively impact the
safety of waterway users and shore side activities in the event area.
The category of water activities includes but is not limited to sail
boat regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew
racing, canoe and sail board racing. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add a temporary section, Sec. 100.35-T05-0046 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-0046 Special Local Regulations for Marine Events;
Severn River, Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All
waters of the Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, within lines connecting
the following positions: from position latitude 38[deg]58'34'' N,
longitude 076[deg]29'05'' W, thence to position latitude 38[deg]58'27''
N, longitude 076[deg]28'55'' W, and from position latitude
38[deg]58'53'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'34'' W to position latitude
38[deg]58'21'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'26'' W. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol vessel, a
vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with
the directions given. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
(2) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date
and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
until 9 a.m. on May 14, 2011.
Dated: April 20, 2011.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2011-11729 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P