Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Increase in Desirable Carryout Used To Compute Trade Demand, 27921-27924 [2011-11715]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
In addition, the recommended late
charge and interest rate were considered
reasonable by industry members who
participated in the discussion of this
issue. Since the proposed late payment
charge and interest rate are percentages
of amounts due, the costs, when
applicable, are proportionate and would
not place an extra burden on small
entities as compared to large entities. In
addition, the industry overall would
benefit if handler reports and
assessments were collected on time and
the Committee’s compliance costs were
reduced regardless of entity size.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this change, including not making a
change to the delinquent assessment
requirements. However, a number of
members commented that if some
handlers were not paying on time, a
change was necessary. The Committee
also considered increasing the interest
rate accrual to daily rather than
monthly, but this option could result in
an interest charge that was
disproportionately large and was
considered to be beyond the scope of
what is reasonable and customary under
marketing order programs. Thus, these
alternatives were rejected.
The proposed action would not
impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large Vidalia onion handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E–Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this proposed rule.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Vidalia onion industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the
February 17, 2011, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on
this issue. Finally, interested persons
are invited to submit comments on this
proposed rule, including the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
27921
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously mentioned address in the
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
[Docket No. AMS–FV–11–0013; FV11–989–
1 PR]
section.
A 15-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Fifteen days is deemed
appropriate because this rule would
need to be in place as soon as possible
as the Committee’s fiscal period began
in January 2011 and handlers began
shipping onions in April. Further,
handlers are aware of the action, which
was unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting on
February 17, 2011. All written
comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination
is made on this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 955
Marketing agreements, Onions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 955 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 955—VIDALIA ONIONS GROWN
IN GEORGIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 955 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 955.142 is amended by
designating the first paragraph as (a) and
the second, (b), and revising newly
designated paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
§ 955.142
Delinquent assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Each handler shall pay interest of
1.5 percent per month on any
assessments levied pursuant to § 955.42
and on any accrued unpaid interest
beginning the day immediately after the
date the monthly assessments were due,
until the delinquent handler’s
assessments, plus applicable interest,
have been paid in full. In addition to the
interest charge, the Committee shall
impose a late payment charge on any
handler whose assessment payment has
not been received within 10 days of the
due date. The late payment charge shall
be 10 percent of the late assessments.
Dated: May 9, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–11711 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown
in California; Increase in Desirable
Carryout Used To Compute Trade
Demand
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This rule would increase the
desirable carryout used to compute the
yearly trade demand for Natural (sundried) Seedless (NS) raisins covered
under the Federal marketing order for
California raisins (order). The order
regulates the handling of raisins
produced from grapes grown in
California and is administered locally
by the Raisin Administrative Committee
(committee). This rule would increase
the amount of tonnage available early in
the season when volume regulation is
implemented, and is expected to help
the industry meet its market needs.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this rule will
be included in the record and will be
made available to the public. Please be
advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street,
Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906; or E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
27922
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
DC 20250–0237; Telephone (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 989 (7 CFR part 989),
both as amended, regulating the
handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction in equity to review USDA’s
ruling on the petition, provided an
action is filed not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the desirable
carryout used to compute the yearly
trade demand for NS raisins regulated
under the order. ‘‘Trade demand’’ is
computed based on a formula specified
in the order, and is used to determine
volume regulation percentages for each
crop year, if necessary. ‘‘Desirable
carryout,’’ one component of this
formula, is the amount of tonnage
carried in from the prior crop year
which is considered necessary to meet
market needs, before raisins from the
new crop year are available.
Currently, the desirable carryout for
NS raisins is defined as: the total
shipments of free tonnage during
August and September of each of the
past 5 crop years, converted to a natural
condition basis, dropping the high and
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
low figures, and dividing the remaining
sum by three, or 60,000 natural
condition tons, whichever is higher.
This rule would increase the desirable
carryout to 85,000 natural condition
tons, with no further calculations
required. This action was unanimously
recommended by the committee at a
meeting held on February 23, 2011.
It should be noted that the desirable
carryout for raisin varieties other than
NS are not impacted by this proposal.
The order provides authority for
volume regulation designed to promote
orderly marketing conditions, stabilize
prices and supplies, and improve
producer returns. When volume
regulation is in effect, a certain
percentage of the California raisin crop
may be sold by handlers to any market
(free tonnage) while the remaining
percentage must be held by handlers in
a reserve pool (reserve) for the account
of the committee.
Reserve raisins are disposed of
through certain programs authorized
under the order. For instance, reserve
raisins may be sold by the committee to
handlers for free use or to replace part
of the free tonnage raisins they
exported; used in diversion programs;
carried over as a hedge against a short
crop the following year; or disposed of
in other outlets not competitive with
those for free tonnage raisins, such as
government purchase, distilleries, or
animal feed. Funds generated from sales
of reserve raisins are also used to
support handler sales to export markets.
Net proceeds from sales of reserve
raisins are ultimately distributed to the
reserve pool’s equity holders, primarily
producers.
Section 989.54 of the order prescribes
procedures to be followed in
establishing volume regulation and
includes methodology used to calculate
volume regulation percentages. Trade
demand is based on a computed formula
specified in this section, and is also part
of the formula used to determine
volume regulation percentages. Trade
demand is equal to 90 percent of the
prior year’s shipments, adjusted by the
carryin and desirable carryout
inventories.
At one time, § 989.54(a) also specified
actual tonnages for desirable carryout
for each varietal type regulated.
However, in 1989, these tonnages were
suspended from the order, and
flexibility was added so that the
committee could adopt other methods
for arriving at a desirable carryout in the
order’s rules and regulations. The
current formula has allowed the
committee to periodically adjust the
desirable carryout to better reflect
changes in marketing conditions, as
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
they have since 1989, most recently in
2000 and 2002.
The formula for desirable carryout has
been specified since 1989 in § 989.154.
Initially, the formula was established so
that desirable carryout was based on
shipments for the first 3 months of the
prior crop year—August, September,
and October (the crop year runs from
August 1 through July 31). The formula
has been changed over the years because
the committee believed that an
excessive supply of raisins was
available early in a new crop year,
which contributed to unstable market
conditions.
However, given recent worldwide
shortages of NS raisins, a favorable
monetary exchange rate, and the
extremely low inventory carried in by
the industry at the beginning of the
2010–11 crop year, the committee
determined that the current trade
demand formula would not provide
enough raisins to meet market demands
when volume regulation is
implemented, especially in the early
part of the crop year when supplies can
be tight. Thus, the committee
recommended increasing the desirable
carryout component of the formula. This
change would also allow desirable
carryout of NS raisins to more
accurately reflect the amount of NS
raisins that handlers actually hold in
inventory at the end of a crop year, or
about 100,000 tons.
The Committee’s Recommendation
At a meeting on February 23, 2011,
the committee reviewed the desirable
carryout level. Most committee
members believe that the supply of free
tonnage raisins on the market has
become tight, and the carryout balance
has resulted in market shortages and
missed marketing opportunities in the
early part of the season. The following
table illustrates handler inventories for
NS raisins have generally been
declining in recent years, with the
exception of 2009–10.
CARRYOUT INVENTORY OVER PAST 6
YEARS
Crop year
2010–11
2009–10
2008–09
2007–08
2006–07
2005–06
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
NS carryout
inventory
(natural condition tons)
83,143
126,824
106,249
105,430
111,444
114,792
Committee staff estimated that this
change to the desirable carryout level
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
would increase the 2011–12 trade
demand for NS raisins by 15,000 tons.
Increasing the trade demand will
increase the free tonnage percentage,
making more free tonnage available to
handlers for immediate use. The effect
of increased free tonnage would be to
decrease any reserve pool which might
be established.
NS raisins are the major commercial
varietal type of raisin produced in
California. With the exception of the
1998–99, 2003–04, and 2010–11 crop
years, volume regulation has been
implemented for NS raisins every year
since 1983.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 28 handlers
of California raisins who are subject to
regulation under the order and
approximately 3,000 raisin producers in
the regulated area. The Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201)
defines small agricultural service firms
as those having annual receipts of less
than $7,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000.
Based upon shipment data and other
information provided by the committee,
it may be concluded that a majority of
producers and approximately 18
handlers of California raisins may be
classified as small entities.
This rule would increase the desirable
carryout used to compute the yearly
trade demand for raisins regulated
under the order. ‘‘Trade demand’’ is
computed based on a formula specified
under § 989.54(a) of the order. It is also
part of another formula used to
determine volume regulation
percentages for each crop year, if
necessary. ‘‘Desirable carryout,’’ one
component of this formula, is the
amount of tonnage from the prior crop
year needed during the first part of the
next crop year to meet market needs,
before new crop raisins are available.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Currently, the desirable carryout for
Natural (sun-dried) Seedless (NS)
raisins is defined as: the total shipments
of free tonnage during August and
September of each of the past 5 crop
years, converted to a natural condition
basis, dropping the high and low
figures, and dividing the remaining sum
by three, or 60,000 natural condition
tons, whichever is higher.
This rule would increase the desirable
carryout to 85,000 natural condition
tons, with no calculations required. This
action was unanimously recommended
by the committee at a meeting held on
February 23, 2011.
The desirable carryout level applies
uniformly to all handlers in the
industry, whether small or large, and
there are no known additional costs
incurred by small handlers. As
previously mentioned, increasing the
desirable carryout will increase the
trade demand and free tonnage
percentage, thus making more raisins
available to handlers early in the season.
This action is expected to provide more
raisins at the beginning of each crop
year to meet early demand, thereby
improving market conditions at a time
period when optimum shipments are
advantageous—in time for the holidays.
Holiday shipments begin in August,
before new-crop raisins are available,
and continue through October, and have
traditionally been the highest shipment
period, as buyers prepare for increased
holiday sales of raisins and goods
containing raisins.
The committee has an appointed
subcommittee, the Administrative
Issues Subcommittee (subcommittee),
which periodically holds public
meetings to discuss changes to the order
and other issues. The subcommittee met
on February 1, 2011, and discussed
desirable carryout, considering a
number of alternative levels of desirable
carryout. While there was no opposition
to increasing the desirable carryout,
some industry members supported
making the NS desirable carryout 90,000
natural condition tons, while some
suggested that 80,000 natural condition
tons was a good alternative. Still others
suggested that the ideal number might
be closer to 100,000 natural condition
tons, in keeping with the average of the
last several years’ actual inventory
carried in at the beginning of the crop
year, 106,000 natural condition tons.
The 85,000 natural condition tons
ultimately recommended was a
compromise reached during
subcommittee deliberations of the
alternatives.
On February 23, 2011, the
subcommittee met again and further
discussed desirable carryout before
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27923
recommending to the full committee
that the desirable carryout be increased
for NS raisins from the current formula
or 60,000 natural condition tons,
whichever is greater, to simply 85,000
natural condition tons. Ultimately, the
full committee adopted the
subcommittee’s recommendation, and
unanimously recommended the change
to USDA.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
raisin handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, the subcommittee’s
meetings on February 1, 2011, and
February 23, 2011; and the committee’s
meeting on February 23, 2011, were
public meetings, widely publicized
throughout the raisin industry. All
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and encouraged to
participate in the industry’s
deliberations. Finally, all interested
persons are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at the following web site:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to comment
on this rule. Thirty days is deemed
appropriate because the committee must
meet to compute trade demand on or
before August 15, and desirable carryout
is one component needed for the trade
demand formula.
This rule invites comments on
increasing the desirable carryout level
specified under the order’s regulations.
All written comments timely received
will be considered before a final
determination is made on this matter.
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
27924
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 989 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 989 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 989.154, the first sentence of
paragraph (a) is revised to read as
follows:
§ 989.154
Marketing policy computations.
(a) * * * The desirable carryout level
to be used in computing and
announcing a crop year’s marketing
policy for Natural (sun-dried) Seedless
raisins shall be 85,000 natural condition
tons. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 9, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–11715 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 2 and 52
[NRC–2011–0102]
RIN 3150–AI77
Draft Regulatory Guide, Guidance for
ITAAC Closure
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft regulatory guide; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public
comment Draft Regulatory Guide (DG)–
1250, ‘‘Guidance for ITAAC Closure
Under 10 CFR Part 52.’’ The DG–1250
describes a method that the staff of the
NRC considers acceptable for use in
satisfying the requirements for
documenting the completion of
inspections, tests, analyses, and
acceptance criteria (ITAAC).
DATES: Submit comments on Draft
Regulatory Guide, DG–1250 by July 25,
2011. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the NRC is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
received on or before this date.
Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or
improvements in all published guides
are encouraged at any time.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2011–0102 in the subject line of
your comments. Comments submitted in
writing or in electronic form will be
posted on the NRC Web site and on the
Federal rulemaking Web site, https://
www.regulations.gov. Because your
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
the NRC cautions you against including
any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party
soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for
submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their
comments to remove any identifying or
contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in
their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed. You may submit
comments by any one of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2011–0102. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301–492–3668; e-mail:
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
• Fax comments to: RADB at 301–
492–3446.
You can access publicly available
documents related to this notice using
the following methods:
• NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR): The public may examine and
have copied, for a fee, publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
created or received at the NRC are
available online in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this page, the public
can gain entry into ADAMS, which
provides text and image files of the
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s
PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Electronic copies
of DG–1250 are available through the
NRC’s public Web site under Draft
Regulatory Guides in the ‘‘Regulatory
Guides’’ collection of the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/. Electronic copies are also
available in ADAMS (https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html),
under Accession No. ML102530401.
The regulatory analysis may be found in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML102530440.
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site:
Public comments and supporting
materials related to this notice can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching on Docket ID NRC–2011–
0102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
R.A. Jervey, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, telephone: 301–251–7404; e-mail:
Richard.Jervey@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The NRC is issuing for public
comment a draft guide in the agency’s
‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series
was developed to describe and make
available to the public such information
as methods that are acceptable to the
NRC staff for implementing specific
parts of the NRC’s regulations,
techniques that the staff uses in
evaluating specific problems or
postulated accidents, and data that the
staff needs in its review of applications
for permits and licenses.
The draft regulatory guide is
temporarily identified by its task
number, DG–1250, which should be
mentioned in all related
correspondence. The DG–1250 is
proposed Revision 1 of Regulatory
Guide 1.215, dated October 2010.
This guide describes a method that
the staff of the NRC considers
acceptable for use in satisfying the
requirements for documenting the
completion of ITAAC. Since the ITAAC
process has yet to be used for a
combined license review under Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) Part 52, this revision includes
refinements in the ITAAC process as the
NRC develops experience with expected
practices by licensees. Further changes
may be recommended following
additional experience with this process.
In general, this revision provides
clarifying information sufficient to
endorse the methodologies described in
the industry guidance document,
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 08–01,
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27921-27924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11715]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. AMS-FV-11-0013; FV11-989-1 PR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Increase in
Desirable Carryout Used To Compute Trade Demand
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the desirable carryout used to
compute the yearly trade demand for Natural (sun-dried) Seedless (NS)
raisins covered under the Federal marketing order for California
raisins (order). The order regulates the handling of raisins produced
from grapes grown in California and is administered locally by the
Raisin Administrative Committee (committee). This rule would increase
the amount of tonnage available early in the season when volume
regulation is implemented, and is expected to help the industry meet
its market needs.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey
Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487-
5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or E-mail: Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
[[Page 27922]]
DC 20250-0237; Telephone (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-
mail: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 989 (7 CFR part 989), both as amended,
regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction in equity to review USDA's ruling on the
petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the desirable carryout used to compute the
yearly trade demand for NS raisins regulated under the order. ``Trade
demand'' is computed based on a formula specified in the order, and is
used to determine volume regulation percentages for each crop year, if
necessary. ``Desirable carryout,'' one component of this formula, is
the amount of tonnage carried in from the prior crop year which is
considered necessary to meet market needs, before raisins from the new
crop year are available.
Currently, the desirable carryout for NS raisins is defined as: the
total shipments of free tonnage during August and September of each of
the past 5 crop years, converted to a natural condition basis, dropping
the high and low figures, and dividing the remaining sum by three, or
60,000 natural condition tons, whichever is higher. This rule would
increase the desirable carryout to 85,000 natural condition tons, with
no further calculations required. This action was unanimously
recommended by the committee at a meeting held on February 23, 2011.
It should be noted that the desirable carryout for raisin varieties
other than NS are not impacted by this proposal.
The order provides authority for volume regulation designed to
promote orderly marketing conditions, stabilize prices and supplies,
and improve producer returns. When volume regulation is in effect, a
certain percentage of the California raisin crop may be sold by
handlers to any market (free tonnage) while the remaining percentage
must be held by handlers in a reserve pool (reserve) for the account of
the committee.
Reserve raisins are disposed of through certain programs authorized
under the order. For instance, reserve raisins may be sold by the
committee to handlers for free use or to replace part of the free
tonnage raisins they exported; used in diversion programs; carried over
as a hedge against a short crop the following year; or disposed of in
other outlets not competitive with those for free tonnage raisins, such
as government purchase, distilleries, or animal feed. Funds generated
from sales of reserve raisins are also used to support handler sales to
export markets. Net proceeds from sales of reserve raisins are
ultimately distributed to the reserve pool's equity holders, primarily
producers.
Section 989.54 of the order prescribes procedures to be followed in
establishing volume regulation and includes methodology used to
calculate volume regulation percentages. Trade demand is based on a
computed formula specified in this section, and is also part of the
formula used to determine volume regulation percentages. Trade demand
is equal to 90 percent of the prior year's shipments, adjusted by the
carryin and desirable carryout inventories.
At one time, Sec. 989.54(a) also specified actual tonnages for
desirable carryout for each varietal type regulated. However, in 1989,
these tonnages were suspended from the order, and flexibility was added
so that the committee could adopt other methods for arriving at a
desirable carryout in the order's rules and regulations. The current
formula has allowed the committee to periodically adjust the desirable
carryout to better reflect changes in marketing conditions, as they
have since 1989, most recently in 2000 and 2002.
The formula for desirable carryout has been specified since 1989 in
Sec. 989.154. Initially, the formula was established so that desirable
carryout was based on shipments for the first 3 months of the prior
crop year--August, September, and October (the crop year runs from
August 1 through July 31). The formula has been changed over the years
because the committee believed that an excessive supply of raisins was
available early in a new crop year, which contributed to unstable
market conditions.
However, given recent worldwide shortages of NS raisins, a
favorable monetary exchange rate, and the extremely low inventory
carried in by the industry at the beginning of the 2010-11 crop year,
the committee determined that the current trade demand formula would
not provide enough raisins to meet market demands when volume
regulation is implemented, especially in the early part of the crop
year when supplies can be tight. Thus, the committee recommended
increasing the desirable carryout component of the formula. This change
would also allow desirable carryout of NS raisins to more accurately
reflect the amount of NS raisins that handlers actually hold in
inventory at the end of a crop year, or about 100,000 tons.
The Committee's Recommendation
At a meeting on February 23, 2011, the committee reviewed the
desirable carryout level. Most committee members believe that the
supply of free tonnage raisins on the market has become tight, and the
carryout balance has resulted in market shortages and missed marketing
opportunities in the early part of the season. The following table
illustrates handler inventories for NS raisins have generally been
declining in recent years, with the exception of 2009-10.
Carryout Inventory Over Past 6 Years
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS carryout
inventory
Crop year (natural
condition
tons)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-11................................................. 83,143
2009-10................................................. 126,824
2008-09................................................. 106,249
2007-08................................................. 105,430
2006-07................................................. 111,444
2005-06................................................. 114,792
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee staff estimated that this change to the desirable
carryout level
[[Page 27923]]
would increase the 2011-12 trade demand for NS raisins by 15,000 tons.
Increasing the trade demand will increase the free tonnage percentage,
making more free tonnage available to handlers for immediate use. The
effect of increased free tonnage would be to decrease any reserve pool
which might be established.
NS raisins are the major commercial varietal type of raisin
produced in California. With the exception of the 1998-99, 2003-04, and
2010-11 crop years, volume regulation has been implemented for NS
raisins every year since 1983.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 28 handlers of California raisins who are
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 3,000 raisin
producers in the regulated area. The Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) defines small agricultural service firms as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
Based upon shipment data and other information provided by the
committee, it may be concluded that a majority of producers and
approximately 18 handlers of California raisins may be classified as
small entities.
This rule would increase the desirable carryout used to compute the
yearly trade demand for raisins regulated under the order. ``Trade
demand'' is computed based on a formula specified under Sec. 989.54(a)
of the order. It is also part of another formula used to determine
volume regulation percentages for each crop year, if necessary.
``Desirable carryout,'' one component of this formula, is the amount of
tonnage from the prior crop year needed during the first part of the
next crop year to meet market needs, before new crop raisins are
available. Currently, the desirable carryout for Natural (sun-dried)
Seedless (NS) raisins is defined as: the total shipments of free
tonnage during August and September of each of the past 5 crop years,
converted to a natural condition basis, dropping the high and low
figures, and dividing the remaining sum by three, or 60,000 natural
condition tons, whichever is higher.
This rule would increase the desirable carryout to 85,000 natural
condition tons, with no calculations required. This action was
unanimously recommended by the committee at a meeting held on February
23, 2011.
The desirable carryout level applies uniformly to all handlers in
the industry, whether small or large, and there are no known additional
costs incurred by small handlers. As previously mentioned, increasing
the desirable carryout will increase the trade demand and free tonnage
percentage, thus making more raisins available to handlers early in the
season. This action is expected to provide more raisins at the
beginning of each crop year to meet early demand, thereby improving
market conditions at a time period when optimum shipments are
advantageous--in time for the holidays. Holiday shipments begin in
August, before new-crop raisins are available, and continue through
October, and have traditionally been the highest shipment period, as
buyers prepare for increased holiday sales of raisins and goods
containing raisins.
The committee has an appointed subcommittee, the Administrative
Issues Subcommittee (subcommittee), which periodically holds public
meetings to discuss changes to the order and other issues. The
subcommittee met on February 1, 2011, and discussed desirable carryout,
considering a number of alternative levels of desirable carryout. While
there was no opposition to increasing the desirable carryout, some
industry members supported making the NS desirable carryout 90,000
natural condition tons, while some suggested that 80,000 natural
condition tons was a good alternative. Still others suggested that the
ideal number might be closer to 100,000 natural condition tons, in
keeping with the average of the last several years' actual inventory
carried in at the beginning of the crop year, 106,000 natural condition
tons. The 85,000 natural condition tons ultimately recommended was a
compromise reached during subcommittee deliberations of the
alternatives.
On February 23, 2011, the subcommittee met again and further
discussed desirable carryout before recommending to the full committee
that the desirable carryout be increased for NS raisins from the
current formula or 60,000 natural condition tons, whichever is greater,
to simply 85,000 natural condition tons. Ultimately, the full committee
adopted the subcommittee's recommendation, and unanimously recommended
the change to USDA.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large raisin handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, the subcommittee's meetings on February 1, 2011, and
February 23, 2011; and the committee's meeting on February 23, 2011,
were public meetings, widely publicized throughout the raisin industry.
All interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and
encouraged to participate in the industry's deliberations. Finally, all
interested persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at the
following web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
comment on this rule. Thirty days is deemed appropriate because the
committee must meet to compute trade demand on or before August 15, and
desirable carryout is one component needed for the trade demand
formula.
This rule invites comments on increasing the desirable carryout
level specified under the order's regulations. All written comments
timely received will be considered before a final determination is made
on this matter.
[[Page 27924]]
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 989 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 989 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. In Sec. 989.154, the first sentence of paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 989.154 Marketing policy computations.
(a) * * * The desirable carryout level to be used in computing and
announcing a crop year's marketing policy for Natural (sun-dried)
Seedless raisins shall be 85,000 natural condition tons. * * *
* * * * *
Dated: May 9, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-11715 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P