Modification of the Significant New Uses of 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)-, 27910-27914 [2011-11435]
Download as PDF
27910
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Dated: April 29, 2011.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
1.
RIN 2070–AB27
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009–0669; FRL–8871–5]
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart W—Massachusetts
2. Section 52.1132 is amended by
adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1132 Control strategy: Carbon
Monoxide.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Approval—On April 14, 2010, the
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection submitted a
modification to the Lowell maintenance
plan approved in paragraph (c) of this
section. Massachusetts will not conduct
CO monitoring in Lowell, but instead
commits to continue to collect and
review CO monitoring data from nearby
Worcester, MA on an on-going basis. In
the event the second highest CO
concentration in any calendar year
monitored in Worcester reaches 75
percent of the federal 1-hour or 8-hour
national ambient air quality standard for
CO, Massachusetts will, within
9 months of recording such
concentrations, re-establish a CO
monitoring site in Lowell consistent
with EPA citing criteria, and resume
analyzing and reporting those data.
Massachusetts commits to implement its
contingency program in Lowell in the
event that a CO violation is monitored
at the re-established Lowell monitoring
site at any time during the maintenance
period. If the Worcester CO monitor
measures a violation of either the
federal 1-hour or 8-hour NAAQS for CO,
contingency measures will be
implemented in Lowell as well, until a
re-established CO monitor in Lowell
shows that the area is in attainment of
the CO standard.
[FR Doc. 2011–11722 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
15:13 May 12, 2011
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing an
amendment to the significant new use
rule (SNUR) under the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) for 2–Propen-1-one,
1-(4-morpholinyl)- (CAS No. 5117–12–
4). This action requires persons who
intend to manufacture, import, or
process the chemical substance for a use
that is designated as a significant new
use by this final rule to notify EPA at
least 90 days before commencing that
activity. EPA believes that this action is
necessary because the chemical
substance may be hazardous to human
health. The required notification would
provide EPA with the opportunity to
evaluate the intended use and, if
necessary, to prohibit or limit that
activity before it occurs.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPPT–2009–0669. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm.
3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Docket visitors are required
to show photographic identification,
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Modification of the Significant New
Uses of 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4morpholinyl)-
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
pass through a metal detector, and sign
the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are
processed through an X-ray machine
and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times in the building and
returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Tracey
Klosterman, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–2209; e-mail address:
klosterman.tracey@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA–Hotline, ABVI–Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; e-mail address: TSCA–
Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, import,
process, or use 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4morpholinyl)-(CAS No. 5117–12–4).
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
• Manufacturers, importers, or
processors of the subject chemical
substance (NAICS codes 325 and
324110), e.g., chemical manufacturing
and petroleum refineries.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
§ 721.5. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
12.118 through 12.127; see also 19 CFR
127.28. Chemical importers must certify
that the shipment of the chemical
substance complies with all applicable
rules and orders under TSCA. Importers
of chemicals subject to a modified
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
SNUR must certify their compliance
with the SNUR requirements. The EPA
policy in support of import certification
appears at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B.
In addition, any persons who export or
intend to export the chemical substance
that is the subject of a final rule are
subject to the export notification
provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15
U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see § 721.20), and must
comply with the export notification
requirements in 40 CFR part 707,
subpart D.
II. Background
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
A. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is finalizing an amendment to
the SNUR for the chemical substance
identified as 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4morpholinyl)- (PMN P–95–169; CAS No.
5117–12–4) codified at § 721.5185. This
final action requires persons who intend
to manufacture, import, or process the
subject chemical substance for an
activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this final rule to
notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity.
In addition, EPA is revising the name
of the chemical substance as it appears
at § 721.5185 to reflect the correct
Chemical Abstracts (CA) Index name.
2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)- is
the correct CA Index name for the
chemical substance represented by CAS
No. 5117–12–4 as it appears on the
TSCA Inventory. The chemical name
Morpholine, 4-(1-oxo-2-propenyl)-,
which currently appears at § 721.5185,
is a synonym for CAS No. 5117–12–4.
This rule was proposed in the Federal
Register of November 5, 2010 (75 FR
68306) (FRL–8849–7). EPA received no
public comments in response to the
proposal. Therefore, the Agency is
issuing a final SNUR as proposed that:
1. Revises the CA Index name for the
chemical substance represented by CAS
No. 5117–12–4 from Morpholine, 4-(1oxo-2-propenyl)- to 2-Propen-1-one,
1-(4-morpholinyl)-.
2. Identifies those forms of the PMN
substance that are exempt from the
provisions of the SNUR. These
exemptions apply to quantities of the
PMN substance after it has been
completely reacted (cured).
3. Revises the protection in the
workplace requirements under § 721.63
to remove all requirements for
respiratory protection.
4. Revises the hazard communication
requirements under § 721.72 to remove
all requirements pertaining to
respiratory protection.
5. Revises the industrial, commercial,
and consumer requirements under
§ 721.80 to remove all requirements
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
pertaining to domestic manufacture, and
aggregate manufacture and import
volumes.
6. Removes all disposal requirements
under § 721.85.
7. Removes all release to water
requirements under § 721.90.
8. Revises the recordkeeping
requirements under § 721.125 to reflect
the aforementioned modified SNUR
requirements.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.″ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
including the four bulleted TSCA
section 5(a)(2) factors listed in Unit IV.
of this document. Once EPA determines
that a use of a chemical substance is a
significant new use, TSCA section
5(a)(1)(B) requires persons to submit a
significant new use notice (SNUN) to
EPA at least 90 days before they
manufacture, import, or process the
chemical substance for that use. Persons
who must report are described in
§ 721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear
in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A. These
provisions describe persons subject to
the rule, recordkeeping requirements,
exemptions to reporting requirements,
and applicability of the rule to uses
occurring before the effective date of the
final rule. Provisions relating to user
fees appear at 40 CFR part 700.
According to § 721.1(c), persons subject
to these SNURs must comply with the
same notice requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as submitters of
PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In
particular, these requirements include
the information submission
requirements of TSCA section 5(b) and
5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by
TSCA section 5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and
(h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR
part 720. Once EPA receives a SNUN,
EPA may take regulatory action under
TSCA section 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control
the activities for which it has received
the SNUN. If EPA does not take action,
EPA is required under TSCA section
5(g) to explain in the Federal Register
its reasons for not taking action.
Chemical importers are subject to the
TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612)
import certification requirements
codified at 19 CFR 12.118 through
12.127; see also 19 CFR 127.28 (the
corresponding EPA policy appears at 40
CFR part 707, subpart B). Chemical
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27911
importers must certify that the shipment
of the chemical substance complies with
all applicable rules and orders under
TSCA. Importers of chemical substances
subject to a modified SNUR must certify
their compliance with the SNUR
requirements. In addition, any persons
who export or intend to export a
chemical substance identified in a
modified SNUR are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see § 721.20)
and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part
707, subpart D.
III. Rationale and Objectives of the Rule
A. Rationale
Under the terms of the TSCA section
5(e) consent order for P–95–0169, the
PMN submitter completed and
submitted required testing for EPA
review. Based on these new data,
concerns remain for possible effects to
the liver, testes, kidney, and blood from
dermal exposure. However, EPA no
longer has substantial human health
concerns for mutagenicity and
neurotoxicity. In addition, based on
these data, Agency concerns for
carcinogenicity by inhalation were
reduced, and further mitigated by
retaining the original consent order
prohibition of industrial processing and
use in a non-enclosed process and any
use application methods that generate a
vapor, mist, or aerosol form of the PMN
substance. Finally, the Agency rereviewed the environmental toxicity
profile for the PMN substance and as a
result of this evaluation could no longer
make a ‘‘may present unreasonable risk″
finding for releases of the PMN
substance to surface waters. As a result
of the aforementioned review, EPA
issued a modified TSCA section 5(e)
consent order, which became effective
on May 9, 2006. These modifications to
the consent order are the same being
made to this SNUR and are described in
Unit II.A.
In addition, the Agency received a
SNUN (S–08–07) for the subject
chemical substance. The significant new
use identified in the notice was release
to water for the generic (nonconfidential) use of ‘‘contained use in
energy production.″ The 90-day review
period for the SNUN expired with the
Agency not taking action on the
‘‘significant new use″ of release of the
substance to water. This decision by the
Agency is consistent with the
modifications made to the consent order
for P–95–169 and today’s SNUR.
Pursuant to § 721.185(a)(5) and as
described in Unit II. of the proposed
rule (see the Federal Register of
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
27912
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
November 5, 2010 (75 FR 68306)), the
Agency has examined new information
and reexamined the test data and other
information supporting its finding
under section 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) of TSCA
for the chemical substance 2–Propen-1one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)-. EPA
determined that existing data no longer
supports a finding that certain activities
involving the substance ‘‘may present an
unreasonable risk″ of injury to human
health and the environment required
under section 5(e)(1)(A) of TSCA.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
B. Objectives
EPA is issuing this modified SNUR
for 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)(PMN P–95–169; CAS No. 5117–12–4)
because the Agency wants to achieve
the following objectives with regard to
the significant new uses designated in
this final rule:
• EPA will receive notice of any
person’s intent to manufacture, import,
or process a listed chemical substance
for the described significant new use
before that activity begins.
• EPA will have an opportunity to
review and evaluate data submitted in a
SNUN before the notice submitter
begins manufacturing, importing, or
processing a listed chemical substance
for the described significant new use.
• EPA will be able to regulate
prospective manufacturers, importers,
or processors of a listed chemical
substance before the described
significant new use of that chemical
substance occurs, provided that
regulation is warranted pursuant to
TSCA sections 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7.
• EPA will ensure that all
manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the same chemical
substance that is subject to a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order are subject to
similar requirements.
IV. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that
EPA’s determination that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use must be made after consideration of
all relevant factors, including:
• The projected volume of
manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
• The extent to which a use changes
the type or form of exposure of human
beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
• The extent to which a use increases
the magnitude and duration of exposure
of human beings or the environment to
a chemical substance.
• The reasonably anticipated manner
and methods of manufacturing,
processing, distribution in commerce,
and disposal of a chemical substance.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
In addition to these factors
enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2), the
statute authorizes EPA to consider any
other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a
significant new use for 2–Propen-1-one,
1-(4-morpholinyl)- subject to this
modified SNUR, EPA considered
relevant information about the toxicity
of the chemical substance, likely human
exposures and environmental releases
associated with possible uses, taking
into consideration the four bulleted
TSCA section 5(a)(2) factors listed in
this unit.
V. Applicability of Rule to Uses
Occurring Before Effective Date of the
Final Rule
As discussed in the Federal Register
of April 24, 1990 (55 FR 17376), EPA
has decided that the intent of TSCA
section 5(a)(1)(B) is best served by
designating a use as a significant new
use as of the date of publication of the
proposed SNUR rather than as of the
effective date of the final rule. If uses
begun after publication were considered
ongoing rather than new, it would be
difficult for EPA to establish SNUR
notice requirements because a person
could defeat the SNUR by initiating the
proposed significant new use before the
rule became effective, and then argue
that the use was ongoing before the
effective date of the final rule.
Any person who began commercial
manufacture, import, or processing of
the chemical substance 2–Propen-1-one,
1-(4-morpholinyl)- (CAS No. 5117–12–
4) for any of the significant new uses
designated in the proposed SNUR
modification after the date of
publication of the proposed SNUR must
stop that activity before the effective
date of this final rule. Persons who
ceased those activities will have to meet
all SNUR notice requirements and wait
until the end of the notification review
period, including all extensions, before
engaging in any activities designated as
significant new uses. If, however,
persons who began manufacture,
import, or processing of the chemical
substance between the date of
publication of the proposed SNUR
modification and the effective date of
this modified SNUR meet the conditions
of advance compliance as codified at
§ 721.45(h), those persons would be
considered to have met the modified
SNUR requirements for those activities.
VI. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5
does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of
a SNUN. There are two exceptions:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. Development of test data is
required where the chemical substance
subject to the SNUR is also subject to a
test rule under TSCA section 4 (see
TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be
necessary where the chemical substance
has been listed under TSCA section
5(b)(4) (see TSCA section 5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4
test rule or a TSCA section 5(b)(4)
listing covering the chemical substance,
persons are required only to submit test
data in their possession or control and
to describe any other data known to or
reasonably ascertainable by them (see
§ 720.50). However, upon review of
PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing.
In this case, EPA recommends persons,
before performing any testing, to consult
with the Agency pertaining to protocol
selection.
The recommended testing specified in
Unit II.A. of the proposed rule may not
be the only means of addressing the
potential risks of the chemical
substance. However, SNUNs submitted
without any test data may increase the
likelihood that EPA will respond by
taking action under TSCA section 5(e),
particularly if satisfactory test results
have not been obtained from a prior
PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA
recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so
that they will be able to conduct the
appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware
that EPA will be better able to evaluate
SNUNs which provide detailed
information on the following:
• Human exposure and
environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the
chemical substance.
• Potential benefits of the chemical
substance.
• Information on risks posed by the
chemical substance compared to risks
posed by potential substitutes.
VII. SNUN Submissions
According to 40 CFR 721.1(c), persons
submitting a SNUN must comply with
the same notice requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as persons
submitting a PMN, including
submission of test data on health and
environmental effects as described in
§ 720.50. SNUNs must be on EPA Form
No. 7710–25, generated using e-PMN
software, and submitted to the Agency
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in §§ 721.25 and 720.40. E–PMN
software is available electronically at
https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
VIII. Economic Analysis
EPA evaluated the potential costs of
establishing SNUN requirements for
potential manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the chemical substance
during the development of the direct
final rule. The Agency’s complete
Economic Analysis is available in the
docket under docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPPT–2009–0669.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
A. Executive Order 12866
This action modifies a SNUR for a
chemical substance that is the subject of
a PMN and TSCA section 5(e) consent
order. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
that requires OMB approval under PRA,
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
of the CFR, after appearing in the
Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if
applicable.
The information collection
requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB
pursuant to PRA under OMB control
number 2070–0012 (EPA ICR No. 574).
This action does not impose any burden
requiring additional OMB approval. If
an entity were to submit a SNUN to the
Agency, the annual burden is estimated
to average between 30 and 170 hours
per response. This burden estimate
includes the time needed to review
instructions, search existing data
sources, gather and maintain the data
needed, and complete, review, and
submit the required SNUN.
Send any comments about the
accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection
techniques, to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division, Office of
Environmental Information (2822T),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. Please remember to
include the OMB control number in any
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
correspondence, but do not submit any
completed forms to this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby
certifies that promulgation of this SNUR
will not have a significant adverse
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The rationale
supporting this conclusion is discussed
in this unit. The requirement to submit
a SNUN applies to any person
(including small or large entities) who
intends to engage in any activity
described in the final rule as a
‘‘significant new use.″ Because these
uses are ‘‘new,″ based on all information
currently available to EPA, it appears
that no small or large entities presently
engage in such activities. A SNUR
requires that any person who intends to
engage in such activity in the future
must first notify EPA by submitting a
SNUN. Although some small entities
may decide to pursue a significant new
use in the future, EPA cannot presently
determine how many, if any, there may
be. However, EPA’s experience to date
is that, in response to the promulgation
of over 1,400 SNURs, the Agency
receives on average only 5 notices per
year. Of those SNUNs submitted from
2006–2008, only one appears to be from
a small entity. In addition, the estimated
reporting cost for submission of a SNUN
(see Unit VIII.) is minimal regardless of
the size of the firm. Therefore, EPA
believes that the potential economic
impacts of complying with this SNUR
are not expected to be significant or
adversely impact a substantial number
of small entities. In a SNUR that
published in the Federal Register of
June 2, 1997 (62 FR 29684) (FRL–5597–
1), the Agency presented its general
determination that modified SNURs are
not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, which was
provided to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Based on EPA’s experience with
proposing and finalizing SNURs, State,
local, and Tribal governments have not
been impacted by these rulemakings,
and EPA does not have any reasons to
believe that any State, local, or Tribal
government will be impacted by this
final rule. As such, EPA has determined
that this final rule does not impose any
enforceable duty, contain any unfunded
mandate, or otherwise have any affect
on small governments subject to the
requirements of sections 202, 203, 204,
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27913
or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4).
E. Executive Order 13132
This action will not have a substantial
direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This final rule does not have Tribal
implications because it is not expected
to have substantial direct effects on
Indian Tribes. This final rule does not
significantly nor uniquely affect the
communities of Indian Tribal
governments, nor does it involve or
impose any requirements that affect
Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this final rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866, and this action does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
In addition, since this action does not
involve any technical standards, section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), does not
apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special
considerations of environmental justice
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
27914
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
related issues as delineated by
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ‘‘major rule″
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 29, 2011.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 721 is
amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
2. Amend § 721.5185 as follows:
a. Revise the section heading.
b. Revise paragraphs (a)(1) and
(a)(2)(i).
■ c. Add paragraph (a)(2)(ii).
■ d. Revise paragraph (a)(2)(iii).
■ e. Remove paragraphs (a)(2)(iv),
(a)(2)(v), and (a)(2)(vi).
■ f. Revise paragraph (b)(1).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
[FR Doc. 2011–11435 Filed 5–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 721.5185 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4morpholinyl)-.
47 CFR Part 73
(a) * * *
(1) The chemical substance identified
as 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)(PMN P–95–169; CAS No. 5117–12–4) is
subject to reporting under this section
for the significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The
requirements of this rule do not apply
to quantities of the PMN substance after
it has been completely reacted (cured).
(2) * * *
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in § 721.63
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 May 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(iv), (a)(3)(i),
(a)(3)(ii), (a)(4), (a)(6)(v), (b)
(concentration set at 1.0 percent), and
(c). Safety 4/4H EVOH/PE laminate,
Ansell Edmont Neoprene number 865,
and Solvex Nitrile Rubber number 275
gloves have been tested in accordance
with the American Society for Testing
Materials (ASTM) F739 method and
found by EPA to satisfy the consent
orders and § 721.63(a)(2)(i) requirements
for dermal protection to 100 percent
PMN substance. Gloves and other
dermal protection may not be used for
a time period longer than they are
actually tested and must be replaced at
the end of each work shift. For
additional dermal protection materials,
a company must submit all test data to
the Agency and must receive written
Agency approval for each type of
material tested prior to use of that
material as worker dermal protection.
However, for the purposes of
determining the imperviousness of
gloves, up to 1 year after the
commencement of commercial
manufacture or import, the employer
may use the method described in
§ 721.63(a)(3)(ii), thereafter, they must
use the method described in
§ 721.63(a)(3)(i).
(ii) Hazard communication program.
Requirements as specified in § 721.72
(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) (concentration set at
1.0 percent), (f), (g)(1)(iv), (g)(1)(vi),
(g)(2)(v), and (g)(5).
(iii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80 (a), (c), and (y)(1).
(b) * * *
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a) through (i) are applicable to
manufacturers, importers, and
processors of this chemical substance.
*
*
*
*
*
[MB Docket No. 11–20; RM–11619, DA 11–
750]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Kalispell, MT
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission has before it
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued
in response to a petition for rulemaking
filed by Montana State University
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(‘‘MSU″) requesting that channel *46 be
transferred from the Pre-Transition DTV
Table of Allotments, 47 CFR 73.622(b),
to the Post-Transition Table of DTV
Allotments, 47 CFR 73.622(i). MSU
states that the grant of its rulemaking
petition and application will serve the
public interest by eliminating a
substantial noncommercial educational
white space area in northwest Montana
and will further the Congressional
mandate in Section 396(a)(9) of the
Communications Act to ensure that all
citizens have access to public
telecommunications services.
DATES: This rule is effective June 13,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Y. Denysyk,
adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media
Bureau, (202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Report
and Order, MB Docket No. 11–20,
adopted April 26, 2011, and released
April 28, 2011. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/). This document
may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone
1–800–478–3160 or via the company’s
Web site, https://www.bcipweb.com. To
request materials in accessible formats
for people with disabilities (braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format), send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty).
This document does not contain
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
information collection burden ‘‘for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees,″ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding.
The Commission will send a copy of
this Report and Order in a report to be
sent to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27910-27914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11435]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0669; FRL-8871-5]
RIN 2070-AB27
Modification of the Significant New Uses of 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-
morpholinyl)-
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing an amendment to the significant new use rule
(SNUR) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 2-Propen-1-
one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)- (CAS No. 5117-12-4). This action requires
persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process the chemical
substance for a use that is designated as a significant new use by this
final rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that
activity. EPA believes that this action is necessary because the
chemical substance may be hazardous to human health. The required
notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the
intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity
before it occurs.
DATES: This final rule is effective June 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0669. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation
are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Tracey Klosterman, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-2209; e-mail address: klosterman.tracey@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; e-mail address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
import, process, or use 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)-(CAS No.
5117-12-4). Potentially affected entities may include, but are not
limited to:
Manufacturers, importers, or processors of the subject
chemical substance (NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g., chemical
manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Sec. 721.5. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This action may also affect certain entities through pre-existing
import certification and export notification rules under TSCA. Chemical
importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612) import
certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through 12.127;
see also 19 CFR 127.28. Chemical importers must certify that the
shipment of the chemical substance complies with all applicable rules
and orders under TSCA. Importers of chemicals subject to a modified
[[Page 27911]]
SNUR must certify their compliance with the SNUR requirements. The EPA
policy in support of import certification appears at 40 CFR part 707,
subpart B. In addition, any persons who export or intend to export the
chemical substance that is the subject of a final rule are subject to
the export notification provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15 U.S.C.
2611(b)) (see Sec. 721.20), and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
II. Background
A. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is finalizing an amendment to the SNUR for the chemical
substance identified as 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)- (PMN P-95-
169; CAS No. 5117-12-4) codified at Sec. 721.5185. This final action
requires persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process the
subject chemical substance for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this final rule to notify EPA at least 90 days
before commencing that activity.
In addition, EPA is revising the name of the chemical substance as
it appears at Sec. 721.5185 to reflect the correct Chemical Abstracts
(CA) Index name. 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)- is the correct CA
Index name for the chemical substance represented by CAS No. 5117-12-4
as it appears on the TSCA Inventory. The chemical name Morpholine, 4-
(1-oxo-2-propenyl)-, which currently appears at Sec. 721.5185, is a
synonym for CAS No. 5117-12-4.
This rule was proposed in the Federal Register of November 5, 2010
(75 FR 68306) (FRL-8849-7). EPA received no public comments in response
to the proposal. Therefore, the Agency is issuing a final SNUR as
proposed that:
1. Revises the CA Index name for the chemical substance represented
by CAS No. 5117-12-4 from Morpholine, 4-(1-oxo-2-propenyl)- to 2-
Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)-.
2. Identifies those forms of the PMN substance that are exempt from
the provisions of the SNUR. These exemptions apply to quantities of the
PMN substance after it has been completely reacted (cured).
3. Revises the protection in the workplace requirements under Sec.
721.63 to remove all requirements for respiratory protection.
4. Revises the hazard communication requirements under Sec. 721.72
to remove all requirements pertaining to respiratory protection.
5. Revises the industrial, commercial, and consumer requirements
under Sec. 721.80 to remove all requirements pertaining to domestic
manufacture, and aggregate manufacture and import volumes.
6. Removes all disposal requirements under Sec. 721.85.
7. Removes all release to water requirements under Sec. 721.90.
8. Revises the recordkeeping requirements under Sec. 721.125 to
reflect the aforementioned modified SNUR requirements.
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to
determine that a use of a chemical substance is a ``significant new
use.'' EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all
relevant factors, including the four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2)
factors listed in Unit IV. of this document. Once EPA determines that a
use of a chemical substance is a significant new use, TSCA section
5(a)(1)(B) requires persons to submit a significant new use notice
(SNUN) to EPA at least 90 days before they manufacture, import, or
process the chemical substance for that use. Persons who must report
are described in Sec. 721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A.
These provisions describe persons subject to the rule, recordkeeping
requirements, exemptions to reporting requirements, and applicability
of the rule to uses occurring before the effective date of the final
rule. Provisions relating to user fees appear at 40 CFR part 700.
According to Sec. 721.1(c), persons subject to these SNURs must comply
with the same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as
submitters of PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In particular, these
requirements include the information submission requirements of TSCA
section 5(b) and 5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by TSCA section
5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR part
720. Once EPA receives a SNUN, EPA may take regulatory action under
TSCA section 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control the activities for which it
has received the SNUN. If EPA does not take action, EPA is required
under TSCA section 5(g) to explain in the Federal Register its reasons
for not taking action.
Chemical importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C.
2612) import certification requirements codified at 19 CFR 12.118
through 12.127; see also 19 CFR 127.28 (the corresponding EPA policy
appears at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B). Chemical importers must certify
that the shipment of the chemical substance complies with all
applicable rules and orders under TSCA. Importers of chemical
substances subject to a modified SNUR must certify their compliance
with the SNUR requirements. In addition, any persons who export or
intend to export a chemical substance identified in a modified SNUR are
subject to the export notification provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15
U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see Sec. 721.20) and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
III. Rationale and Objectives of the Rule
A. Rationale
Under the terms of the TSCA section 5(e) consent order for P-95-
0169, the PMN submitter completed and submitted required testing for
EPA review. Based on these new data, concerns remain for possible
effects to the liver, testes, kidney, and blood from dermal exposure.
However, EPA no longer has substantial human health concerns for
mutagenicity and neurotoxicity. In addition, based on these data,
Agency concerns for carcinogenicity by inhalation were reduced, and
further mitigated by retaining the original consent order prohibition
of industrial processing and use in a non-enclosed process and any use
application methods that generate a vapor, mist, or aerosol form of the
PMN substance. Finally, the Agency re-reviewed the environmental
toxicity profile for the PMN substance and as a result of this
evaluation could no longer make a ``may present unreasonable risk''
finding for releases of the PMN substance to surface waters. As a
result of the aforementioned review, EPA issued a modified TSCA section
5(e) consent order, which became effective on May 9, 2006. These
modifications to the consent order are the same being made to this SNUR
and are described in Unit II.A.
In addition, the Agency received a SNUN (S-08-07) for the subject
chemical substance. The significant new use identified in the notice
was release to water for the generic (non-confidential) use of
``contained use in energy production.'' The 90-day review period for
the SNUN expired with the Agency not taking action on the ``significant
new use'' of release of the substance to water. This decision by the
Agency is consistent with the modifications made to the consent order
for P-95-169 and today's SNUR.
Pursuant to Sec. 721.185(a)(5) and as described in Unit II. of the
proposed rule (see the Federal Register of
[[Page 27912]]
November 5, 2010 (75 FR 68306)), the Agency has examined new
information and reexamined the test data and other information
supporting its finding under section 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I) of TSCA for the
chemical substance 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)-. EPA determined
that existing data no longer supports a finding that certain activities
involving the substance ``may present an unreasonable risk'' of injury
to human health and the environment required under section 5(e)(1)(A)
of TSCA.
B. Objectives
EPA is issuing this modified SNUR for 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-
morpholinyl)- (PMN P-95-169; CAS No. 5117-12-4) because the Agency
wants to achieve the following objectives with regard to the
significant new uses designated in this final rule:
EPA will receive notice of any person's intent to
manufacture, import, or process a listed chemical substance for the
described significant new use before that activity begins.
EPA will have an opportunity to review and evaluate data
submitted in a SNUN before the notice submitter begins manufacturing,
importing, or processing a listed chemical substance for the described
significant new use.
EPA will be able to regulate prospective manufacturers,
importers, or processors of a listed chemical substance before the
described significant new use of that chemical substance occurs,
provided that regulation is warranted pursuant to TSCA sections 5(e),
5(f), 6, or 7.
EPA will ensure that all manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the same chemical substance that is subject to a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order are subject to similar requirements.
IV. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that EPA's determination that a use
of a chemical substance is a significant new use must be made after
consideration of all relevant factors, including:
The projected volume of manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
The extent to which a use changes the type or form of
exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical substance.
The extent to which a use increases the magnitude and
duration of exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
The reasonably anticipated manner and methods of
manufacturing, processing, distribution in commerce, and disposal of a
chemical substance.
In addition to these factors enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2),
the statute authorizes EPA to consider any other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a significant new use for 2-
Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)- subject to this modified SNUR, EPA
considered relevant information about the toxicity of the chemical
substance, likely human exposures and environmental releases associated
with possible uses, taking into consideration the four bulleted TSCA
section 5(a)(2) factors listed in this unit.
V. Applicability of Rule to Uses Occurring Before Effective Date of the
Final Rule
As discussed in the Federal Register of April 24, 1990 (55 FR
17376), EPA has decided that the intent of TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) is
best served by designating a use as a significant new use as of the
date of publication of the proposed SNUR rather than as of the
effective date of the final rule. If uses begun after publication were
considered ongoing rather than new, it would be difficult for EPA to
establish SNUR notice requirements because a person could defeat the
SNUR by initiating the proposed significant new use before the rule
became effective, and then argue that the use was ongoing before the
effective date of the final rule.
Any person who began commercial manufacture, import, or processing
of the chemical substance 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)- (CAS No.
5117-12-4) for any of the significant new uses designated in the
proposed SNUR modification after the date of publication of the
proposed SNUR must stop that activity before the effective date of this
final rule. Persons who ceased those activities will have to meet all
SNUR notice requirements and wait until the end of the notification
review period, including all extensions, before engaging in any
activities designated as significant new uses. If, however, persons who
began manufacture, import, or processing of the chemical substance
between the date of publication of the proposed SNUR modification and
the effective date of this modified SNUR meet the conditions of advance
compliance as codified at Sec. 721.45(h), those persons would be
considered to have met the modified SNUR requirements for those
activities.
VI. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5 does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of a SNUN. There are two
exceptions:
1. Development of test data is required where the chemical
substance subject to the SNUR is also subject to a test rule under TSCA
section 4 (see TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be necessary where the chemical
substance has been listed under TSCA section 5(b)(4) (see TSCA section
5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4 test rule or a TSCA section
5(b)(4) listing covering the chemical substance, persons are required
only to submit test data in their possession or control and to describe
any other data known to or reasonably ascertainable by them (see Sec.
[emsp14]720.50). However, upon review of PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has
the authority to require appropriate testing. In this case, EPA
recommends persons, before performing any testing, to consult with the
Agency pertaining to protocol selection.
The recommended testing specified in Unit II.A. of the proposed
rule may not be the only means of addressing the potential risks of the
chemical substance. However, SNUNs submitted without any test data may
increase the likelihood that EPA will respond by taking action under
TSCA section 5(e), particularly if satisfactory test results have not
been obtained from a prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA recommends that
potential SNUN submitters contact EPA early enough so that they will be
able to conduct the appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware that EPA will be better able to
evaluate SNUNs which provide detailed information on the following:
Human exposure and environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the chemical substance.
Potential benefits of the chemical substance.
Information on risks posed by the chemical substance
compared to risks posed by potential substitutes.
VII. SNUN Submissions
According to 40 CFR 721.1(c), persons submitting a SNUN must comply
with the same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as
persons submitting a PMN, including submission of test data on health
and environmental effects as described in Sec. 720.50. SNUNs must be
on EPA Form No. 7710-25, generated using e-PMN software, and submitted
to the Agency in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. Sec.
721.25 and 720.40. E-PMN software is available electronically at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
[[Page 27913]]
VIII. Economic Analysis
EPA evaluated the potential costs of establishing SNUN requirements
for potential manufacturers, importers, and processors of the chemical
substance during the development of the direct final rule. The Agency's
complete Economic Analysis is available in the docket under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0669.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This action modifies a SNUR for a chemical substance that is the
subject of a PMN and TSCA section 5(e) consent order. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information that requires OMB
approval under PRA, unless it has been approved by OMB and displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if applicable.
The information collection requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB control number
2070-0012 (EPA ICR No. 574). This action does not impose any burden
requiring additional OMB approval. If an entity were to submit a SNUN
to the Agency, the annual burden is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden estimate includes the time needed
to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and
maintain the data needed, and complete, review, and submit the required
SNUN.
Send any comments about the accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including
through the use of automated collection techniques, to the Director,
Collection Strategies Division, Office of Environmental Information
(2822T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. Please remember to include the OMB control
number in any correspondence, but do not submit any completed forms to
this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby certifies that promulgation
of this SNUR will not have a significant adverse economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The rationale supporting this
conclusion is discussed in this unit. The requirement to submit a SNUN
applies to any person (including small or large entities) who intends
to engage in any activity described in the final rule as a
``significant new use.'' Because these uses are ``new,'' based on all
information currently available to EPA, it appears that no small or
large entities presently engage in such activities. A SNUR requires
that any person who intends to engage in such activity in the future
must first notify EPA by submitting a SNUN. Although some small
entities may decide to pursue a significant new use in the future, EPA
cannot presently determine how many, if any, there may be. However,
EPA's experience to date is that, in response to the promulgation of
over 1,400 SNURs, the Agency receives on average only 5 notices per
year. Of those SNUNs submitted from 2006-2008, only one appears to be
from a small entity. In addition, the estimated reporting cost for
submission of a SNUN (see Unit VIII.) is minimal regardless of the size
of the firm. Therefore, EPA believes that the potential economic
impacts of complying with this SNUR are not expected to be significant
or adversely impact a substantial number of small entities. In a SNUR
that published in the Federal Register of June 2, 1997 (62 FR 29684)
(FRL-5597-1), the Agency presented its general determination that
modified SNURs are not expected to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities, which was provided to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Based on EPA's experience with proposing and finalizing SNURs,
State, local, and Tribal governments have not been impacted by these
rulemakings, and EPA does not have any reasons to believe that any
State, local, or Tribal government will be impacted by this final rule.
As such, EPA has determined that this final rule does not impose any
enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or otherwise have any
affect on small governments subject to the requirements of sections
202, 203, 204, or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
E. Executive Order 13132
This action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This final rule does not have Tribal implications because it is not
expected to have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes. This
final rule does not significantly nor uniquely affect the communities
of Indian Tribal governments, nor does it involve or impose any
requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this final rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an economically
significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866, and
this action does not address environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because this action
is not expected to affect energy supply, distribution, or use and
because this action is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
In addition, since this action does not involve any technical
standards, section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15
U.S.C. 272 note), does not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special considerations of environmental
justice
[[Page 27914]]
related issues as delineated by Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 29, 2011.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 721 is amended as follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
0
2. Amend Sec. 721.5185 as follows:
0
a. Revise the section heading.
0
b. Revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)(i).
0
c. Add paragraph (a)(2)(ii).
0
d. Revise paragraph (a)(2)(iii).
0
e. Remove paragraphs (a)(2)(iv), (a)(2)(v), and (a)(2)(vi).
0
f. Revise paragraph (b)(1).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 721.5185 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-morpholinyl)-.
(a) * * *
(1) The chemical substance identified as 2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-
morpholinyl)-(PMN P-95-169; CAS No. 5117-12-4) is subject to reporting
under this section for the significant new uses described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section. The requirements of this rule do not apply to
quantities of the PMN substance after it has been completely reacted
(cured).
(2) * * *
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63 (a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(iv), (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), (a)(4),
(a)(6)(v), (b) (concentration set at 1.0 percent), and (c). Safety 4/4H
EVOH/PE laminate, Ansell Edmont Neoprene number 865, and Solvex Nitrile
Rubber number 275 gloves have been tested in accordance with the
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) F739 method and found by
EPA to satisfy the consent orders and Sec. 721.63(a)(2)(i)
requirements for dermal protection to 100 percent PMN substance. Gloves
and other dermal protection may not be used for a time period longer
than they are actually tested and must be replaced at the end of each
work shift. For additional dermal protection materials, a company must
submit all test data to the Agency and must receive written Agency
approval for each type of material tested prior to use of that material
as worker dermal protection. However, for the purposes of determining
the imperviousness of gloves, up to 1 year after the commencement of
commercial manufacture or import, the employer may use the method
described in Sec. 721.63(a)(3)(ii), thereafter, they must use the
method described in Sec. 721.63(a)(3)(i).
(ii) Hazard communication program. Requirements as specified in
Sec. 721.72 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) (concentration set at 1.0
percent), (f), (g)(1)(iv), (g)(1)(vi), (g)(2)(v), and (g)(5).
(iii) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80 (a), (c), and (y)(1).
(b) * * *
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125 (a) through (i) are applicable to manufacturers, importers, and
processors of this chemical substance.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-11435 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P