Office of Biotechnology Activities; Recombinant DNA Research: Action Under the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines), 27653-27655 [2011-11668]

Download as PDF wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2011 / Notices Contact Person: Weihua Luo, MD, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5114, MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435– 1170, luow@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group, Molecular Genetics C Study Section. Date: June 23–24, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. Contact Person: Michael M. Sveda, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2204, MSC 7890, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435– 3565, svedam@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Bioengineering Sciences & Technologies Integrated Review Group, Gene and Drug Delivery Systems Study Section. Date: June 23–24, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: St. Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036. Contact Person: Amy L. Rubinstein, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5152, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–408– 9754, rubinsteinal@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Population Sciences and Epidemiology Integrated Review Group, Social Sciences and Population Studies Study Section. Date: June 23, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Loews Annapolis Hotel, 126 West Street, Annapolis, MD 21401. Contact Person: Bob Weller, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3160, MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435– 0694, wellerr@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Small Business: Risk Prevention and Health Behavior. Date: June 23–24, 2011. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: West Chicago Lakeshore, 644 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611. Contact Person: Claire E.Gutkin, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3106, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–594– 3139, gutkincl@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Member Conflict: Environmental Causes for Retinopathy. Date: June 23–24, 2011. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:49 May 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 Time: 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting). Contact Person: Raya Mandler, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5217, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–402– 8228, rayam@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Cancer Etiology Overflow. Date: June 24, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015. Contact Person: Elaine Sierra-Rivera, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6184, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435– 1779, riverase@csr.nih.gov. Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, RFA Panel: Understanding and Promoting Health Literacy. Date: June 24, 2011. Time: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Crowne Plaza Hotel—Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Contact Person: Rebecca Henry, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3222, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435– 1717, henryrr@mail.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844, 93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: May 5, 2011. Jennifer S. Spaeth, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 27653 provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Mitochondrial Biomarkers Review Meeting. Date: June 2, 2011. Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: Hilton Garden Inn Durham Southpoint, 7007 Fayetteville Road, Durham, NC 27713. Contact Person: Linda K. Bass, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, Nat. Institute Environmental Health Sciences, P. O. Box 12233, MD EC–30, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 541–1307, bass@niehs.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, Biometry and Risk Estimation—Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances—Basic Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: May 5, 2011. Jennifer S. Spaeth, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–11662 Filed 5–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES [FR Doc. 2011–11661 Filed 5–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P National Institutes of Health DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Office of Biotechnology Activities; Recombinant DNA Research: Action Under the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines) National Institutes of Health National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 National Institutes of Health (NIH), PHS, DHHS. ACTION: Notice of final actions under the NIH Guidelines and notice of an addition to Appendix D of the NIH Guidelines. AGENCY: A proposal to certify Kluyveromyces lactis as a host-vector 1 system has been reviewed by the NIH SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1 27654 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2011 / Notices Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) and approved by the NIH Director. This decision is based upon the determination that the K. lactis hostvector 1 system affords a moderate degree of biological containment equal to other certified host-vector 1 systems presently listed in the NIH Guidelines. Moreover, it has been determined that certain research with this host-vector system does not present a significant risk to health and the environment and therefore will be exempt from the NIH Guidelines (See Section III–F–6 and Appendix C). Appendix C has been modified to indicate the nature of the research that is exempt when performed in a K. lactis certified host-vector 1 system. In addition, the Office of Biotechnology Activities is updating Appendix D of the NIH Guidelines to include additional lines of experimentation approved by the NIH Director; in this case an experiment involving the introduction of tetracycline resistance into Chlamydia trachomatis that falls under Section III– A–1–a of the NIH Guidelines. DATES: The final action regarding certification of a new host-vector 1 system is effective April 14, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background documentation and additional information can be obtained from the Office of Biotechnology Activities, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, MSC 7985, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; e-mail at oba@od.nih.gov, or telephone at 301– 496–9838. The NIH OBA Web site is located at: https://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/. SUPPLEMENTARY INORMATION: Under the NIH Guidelines, certification of a hostvector 1 system is based on assessment of the biological containment provided by the recombinant DNA vector (plasmid or virus) and the host (bacterial or lower eukaryote) in which the vector is propagated in the laboratory. Per the NIH Guidelines, a combination of vector and host can be certified based on the ability of this system to provide biological containment so that ‘‘the following types of ‘escape’ are minimized: (i) Survival of the vector in its host outside of the laboratory and (ii) transmission of the vector from the propagation host to other non-laboratory hosts’’ (see Appendix I–I). Host-vector 1 systems provide a moderate level of containment (Appendix I). Most low volume (< 10 liters) research with host-vector 1 systems is exempt from the NIH Guidelines and therefore does not require registration with the IBC. High volume (> than 10 liters) research with VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:49 May 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 a certified host-vector 1 system requires IBC review; however, the required containment practices are not as comprehensive as those required for similar research not involving a hostvector 1 system. For example, because of the biological containment provided by the host-vector 1 system, large volume research in a host-vector 1 system does not require all recombinant material to be handled in a closed system. In making a determination regarding whether a host-vector combination provides moderate biological containment and therefore can appropriately be certified as a hostvector 1 system, the following information is considered: the host’s natural habitat and growth requirements; its physiologic properties, particularly reproduction, survival, and mechanisms for exchange of genetic information; and the history of the particular strains and vectors to be used, including mutations that render this organism less able to survive or transmit genetic information. The Office of Biotechnology Activities received a request from New England BioLabs (NEB) to certify K. lactis as a host-vector 1 system under the NIH Guidelines and to exempt certain research with this host-vector system. Specifically, NEB requested certification of two parental, laboratory-adapted lineages of K. lactis. One is a strain selected by the K. lactis research community for genome sequencing and the second is a K. lactis strain originally isolated in the 1980s from a dairy process. This latter strain has been used as a host strain in the food industry for heterologous protein expression. In addition, NEB has created host strains that are genetically modified through deletion of one or more genes, including genes involved in the synthesis of cellular components (e.g., those involved in biosynthetic activities and modification of host proteins: proteases and glycosylases). Most of the vectors proposed by NEB are plasmids derived from pGBN1, a K. lactis-Escherichia coli shuttle plasmid containing selectable markers for growth in both organisms. The pGBN1-derived plasmids stably integrate into the LAC4 region of the K. lactis chromosome. Other available plasmids for use in K. lactis are derived from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2micron plasmid and remain stable in an episomal state with a copy number of about 50. NEB noted that K. lactis has a 20+ year history of safe use as an expression system in regulated food industry processes. NEB further stated that they had found K. lactis to provide an PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 excellent system for heterologous protein expression. With regards to its appropriateness for certification as a host-vector 1 system, K. lactis is closely related to S. cerevisiae, which is certified as a host-vector 1 system. K. lactis, however, is unable to exchange genetic material with this closely related yeast. K. lactis can exchange genetic material only with itself and in rare cases with other Kluyveromyces species, thus affording an additional degree of biologic containment. On November 15, 2010, background information on these actions and instructions for submitting public comment were published in the Federal Register (75 FR 69687). No public comments were received regarding the proposal to certify K. lactis as a hostvector 1 system. On December 7, 2010, the RAC discussed whether there are sufficient data as outlined in Appendix I–II–B–1 of the NIH Guidelines to certify K. lactis and its associated plasmids as a host-vector 1 system. In its assessment of the request, the RAC considered a number of factors, including that: (1) K. lactis is a natural and indispensable component of cultured dairy processes (including yogurt, cheese and buttermilk) and has been used widely in the food industry to express heterologous proteins (e.g. lactase which has been used to treat lactose intolerance); (2) its optimum growth is at 30 °C, thereby limiting its survival within humans and most other warm-blooded animals; (3) genetic exchange is limited to a few Kluyveromyces species, which rarely cause any disease in humans (with the exception of rare reports of superficial skin disease with K. marxianus, a closely related yeast), and (4) there are no documented cases of disease or toxicity attributed to K. lactis. With regard to the plasmids proposed for certification, the Committee noted that plasmids that can replicate in K. lactis exist in low copy number, will not be efficiently transferred between K. lactis strains, and are not transferrable to other yeast via mating (K. lactis is unable to mate with other yeast). In sum, it was determined that K. lactis meets the requirements of a host-vector 1 system. The RAC recommended that laboratory-adapted strains of K. lactis should be certified as a host-vector 1 system, as it was the Committee’s assessment that laboratory adapted strains grown under optimized laboratory conditions will be at a selective disadvantage, and thus less competitive compared to strains isolated from the wild. Of note, even wild-type K. lactis has a limited natural habitat and growth requirement, mainly E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2011 / Notices restricted to lactose-rich environments. Plasmids that can be used in K. lactis are not capable of replicating to high copy numbers. Due to the additional containment and corresponding vastly reduced risk to either human health or the environment afforded by host-vector 1 systems, research with this system will be exempt from the NIH Guidelines unless the system is: (i) Capable of producing a molecule that is toxic to vertebrates; (ii) contains DNA from a Risk Group 3 or 4 organism (see Appendix B of the NIH Guidelines); or (iii) will be employed for large scale (> 10 liters) experimentation. The following new appendix (C–IV) will be added to Appendix C of the NIH Guidelines. The current Appendices C– IV through C–VIII (and sub-appendices) will be renumbered to Appendices C–V through C–IX, respectively. wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1 Appendix C–IV Kluyveromyces HostVector Systems Experiments involving Kluyveromyces lactis host-vector systems, with the exception of experiments listed in Appendix C–IV–A, are exempt from the NIH Guidelines provided laboratoryadapted strains are used (i.e. strains that have been adapted to growth under optimal or defined laboratory conditions). For these exempt experiments, BL1 physical containment is recommended. For large-scale fermentation experiments, the appropriate physical containment conditions need be no greater than those for the host organism unmodified by recombinant DNA techniques; the Institutional Biosafety Committee may specify higher containment if deemed necessary. Appendix C–IV–A Exceptions The following categories are not exempt from the NIH Guidelines: (i) Experiments described in Section III–B, which require NIH/OBA and Institutional Biosafety Committee approval before initiation; (ii) experiments involving DNA from Risk Groups 3, 4, or restricted organisms (see Appendix B, Classification of Human Etiologic Agents on the Basis of Hazard, and Sections V–G and V–L, Footnotes and References of Sections I through IV) or cells known to be infected with these agents may be conducted under containment conditions specified in Section III–D–2 with prior Institutional Biosafety Committee review and approval; (iii) large-scale experiments (e.g., more than 10 liters of culture), and (v) experiments involving the deliberate cloning of genes coding for the biosynthesis of molecules toxic for vertebrates (see Appendix F, VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:49 May 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 Containment Conditions for Cloning of Genes Coding for the Biosynthesis of Molecules Toxic for Vertebrates). Additions to Appendix D of the NIH Guidelines In accordance with Section III–A of the NIH Guidelines, Appendix D of the NIH Guidelines will be modified as follows to reflect a recent approval for the transfer of a drug resistance trait to a microorganism. Appendix D–118. Dr. Harlan Caldwell at the Rocky Mountain Laboratories may conduct experiments to deliberately introduce a gene encoding tetracycline resistance into Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2. This approval is specific to Dr. Caldwell and research with this resistant organism may only occur under the conditions as specified by the NIH Director. This approval was effective as of April 26, 2010. Dated: May 6, 2011. Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, Acting Director, Office of Biotechnology Activities, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc. 2011–11668 Filed 5–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Transportation Security Administration [Docket No. TSA–2001–11120] Intent To Request Renewal From OMB of One Current Public Collection of Information; Imposition and Collection of Passenger Civil Aviation Security Service Fees 27655 Comments may be e-mailed to TSAPRA@dhs.gov or delivered to the TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information Technology (OIT), TSA–11, Transportation Security Administration, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598–6011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanna Johnson at the above address, or by telephone (571) 227–3651. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: Comments Invited In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The ICR documentation is available at https://www.reginfo.gov. Therefore, in preparation for OMB review and approval of the following information collection, TSA is soliciting comments to— (1) Evaluate whether the proposed information requirement is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including using appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. AGENCY: Information Collection Requirement The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) invites public comment on one currently approved Information Collection Request (ICR), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number 1652–0001, abstracted below that we will submit to OMB for renewal in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. The collection involves air carriers maintaining an accounting system to account for the passenger civil aviation security service fees collected and reporting this information to TSA on a quarterly basis, as well as retaining the data used for these reports for a six-year rolling period. DATES: Send your comments by July 11, 2011. OMB Control Number 1652–0001; Imposition and Collection of Passenger Civil Aviation Security Service Fees. In accordance with the Aviation Transportation Security Act (ATSA) (49 U.S.C. 44940) and relevant TSA Regulations (49 CFR part 1510), TSA imposes a Passenger Civil Aviation Security Service Fee (September 11th Security Fee) on passengers of both foreign and domestic air carriers (‘‘air carriers’’) on flights originating at airports in the United States to assist with aviation security costs. The September 11th Security Fee is used to help defray the costs of providing Federal civil aviation security services. This information collection requires air carriers to submit to TSA the amount of September 11th Security Fees they have imposed, collected, remitted, and refunded. The retention of this data is necessary for TSA to impose, collect, and regulate the Security Fee. Transportation Security Administration, DHS. ACTION: 60-day Notice. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27653-27655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of Biotechnology Activities; Recombinant DNA Research: 
Action Under the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA 
Molecules (NIH Guidelines)

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health (NIH), PHS, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice of final actions under the NIH Guidelines and notice of 
an addition to Appendix D of the NIH Guidelines.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A proposal to certify Kluyveromyces lactis as a host-vector 1 
system has been reviewed by the NIH

[[Page 27654]]

Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC) and approved by the NIH 
Director. This decision is based upon the determination that the K. 
lactis host-vector 1 system affords a moderate degree of biological 
containment equal to other certified host-vector 1 systems presently 
listed in the NIH Guidelines.
    Moreover, it has been determined that certain research with this 
host-vector system does not present a significant risk to health and 
the environment and therefore will be exempt from the NIH Guidelines 
(See Section III-F-6 and Appendix C). Appendix C has been modified to 
indicate the nature of the research that is exempt when performed in a 
K. lactis certified host-vector 1 system.
    In addition, the Office of Biotechnology Activities is updating 
Appendix D of the NIH Guidelines to include additional lines of 
experimentation approved by the NIH Director; in this case an 
experiment involving the introduction of tetracycline resistance into 
Chlamydia trachomatis that falls under Section III-A-1-a of the NIH 
Guidelines.

DATES: The final action regarding certification of a new host-vector 1 
system is effective April 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Background documentation and 
additional information can be obtained from the Office of Biotechnology 
Activities, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 
750, MSC 7985, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; e-mail at oba@od.nih.gov, or 
telephone at 301-496-9838. The NIH OBA Web site is located at: https://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INORMATION: Under the NIH Guidelines, certification of a 
host-vector 1 system is based on assessment of the biological 
containment provided by the recombinant DNA vector (plasmid or virus) 
and the host (bacterial or lower eukaryote) in which the vector is 
propagated in the laboratory. Per the NIH Guidelines, a combination of 
vector and host can be certified based on the ability of this system to 
provide biological containment so that ``the following types of 
`escape' are minimized: (i) Survival of the vector in its host outside 
of the laboratory and (ii) transmission of the vector from the 
propagation host to other non-laboratory hosts'' (see Appendix I-I). 
Host-vector 1 systems provide a moderate level of containment (Appendix 
I). Most low volume (< 10 liters) research with host-vector 1 systems 
is exempt from the NIH Guidelines and therefore does not require 
registration with the IBC. High volume (> than 10 liters) research with 
a certified host-vector 1 system requires IBC review; however, the 
required containment practices are not as comprehensive as those 
required for similar research not involving a host-vector 1 system. For 
example, because of the biological containment provided by the host-
vector 1 system, large volume research in a host-vector 1 system does 
not require all recombinant material to be handled in a closed system.
    In making a determination regarding whether a host-vector 
combination provides moderate biological containment and therefore can 
appropriately be certified as a host-vector 1 system, the following 
information is considered: the host's natural habitat and growth 
requirements; its physiologic properties, particularly reproduction, 
survival, and mechanisms for exchange of genetic information; and the 
history of the particular strains and vectors to be used, including 
mutations that render this organism less able to survive or transmit 
genetic information.
    The Office of Biotechnology Activities received a request from New 
England BioLabs (NEB) to certify K. lactis as a host-vector 1 system 
under the NIH Guidelines and to exempt certain research with this host-
vector system. Specifically, NEB requested certification of two 
parental, laboratory-adapted lineages of K. lactis. One is a strain 
selected by the K. lactis research community for genome sequencing and 
the second is a K. lactis strain originally isolated in the 1980s from 
a dairy process. This latter strain has been used as a host strain in 
the food industry for heterologous protein expression. In addition, NEB 
has created host strains that are genetically modified through deletion 
of one or more genes, including genes involved in the synthesis of 
cellular components (e.g., those involved in biosynthetic activities 
and modification of host proteins: proteases and glycosylases). Most of 
the vectors proposed by NEB are plasmids derived from pGBN1, a K. 
lactis-Escherichia coli shuttle plasmid containing selectable markers 
for growth in both organisms. The pGBN1-derived plasmids stably 
integrate into the LAC4 region of the K. lactis chromosome. Other 
available plasmids for use in K. lactis are derived from the 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2-micron plasmid and remain stable in an 
episomal state with a copy number of about 50.
    NEB noted that K. lactis has a 20+ year history of safe use as an 
expression system in regulated food industry processes. NEB further 
stated that they had found K. lactis to provide an excellent system for 
heterologous protein expression. With regards to its appropriateness 
for certification as a host-vector 1 system, K. lactis is closely 
related to S. cerevisiae, which is certified as a host-vector 1 system. 
K. lactis, however, is unable to exchange genetic material with this 
closely related yeast. K. lactis can exchange genetic material only 
with itself and in rare cases with other Kluyveromyces species, thus 
affording an additional degree of biologic containment.
    On November 15, 2010, background information on these actions and 
instructions for submitting public comment were published in the 
Federal Register (75 FR 69687). No public comments were received 
regarding the proposal to certify K. lactis as a host-vector 1 system. 
On December 7, 2010, the RAC discussed whether there are sufficient 
data as outlined in Appendix I-II-B-1 of the NIH Guidelines to certify 
K. lactis and its associated plasmids as a host-vector 1 system.
    In its assessment of the request, the RAC considered a number of 
factors, including that: (1) K. lactis is a natural and indispensable 
component of cultured dairy processes (including yogurt, cheese and 
buttermilk) and has been used widely in the food industry to express 
heterologous proteins (e.g. lactase which has been used to treat 
lactose intolerance); (2) its optimum growth is at 30 [deg]C, thereby 
limiting its survival within humans and most other warm-blooded 
animals; (3) genetic exchange is limited to a few Kluyveromyces 
species, which rarely cause any disease in humans (with the exception 
of rare reports of superficial skin disease with K. marxianus, a 
closely related yeast), and (4) there are no documented cases of 
disease or toxicity attributed to K. lactis. With regard to the 
plasmids proposed for certification, the Committee noted that plasmids 
that can replicate in K. lactis exist in low copy number, will not be 
efficiently transferred between K. lactis strains, and are not 
transferrable to other yeast via mating (K. lactis is unable to mate 
with other yeast). In sum, it was determined that K. lactis meets the 
requirements of a host-vector 1 system.
    The RAC recommended that laboratory-adapted strains of K. lactis 
should be certified as a host-vector 1 system, as it was the 
Committee's assessment that laboratory adapted strains grown under 
optimized laboratory conditions will be at a selective disadvantage, 
and thus less competitive compared to strains isolated from the wild. 
Of note, even wild-type K. lactis has a limited natural habitat and 
growth requirement, mainly

[[Page 27655]]

restricted to lactose-rich environments. Plasmids that can be used in 
K. lactis are not capable of replicating to high copy numbers. Due to 
the additional containment and corresponding vastly reduced risk to 
either human health or the environment afforded by host-vector 1 
systems, research with this system will be exempt from the NIH 
Guidelines unless the system is: (i) Capable of producing a molecule 
that is toxic to vertebrates; (ii) contains DNA from a Risk Group 3 or 
4 organism (see Appendix B of the NIH Guidelines); or (iii) will be 
employed for large scale (> 10 liters) experimentation.
    The following new appendix (C-IV) will be added to Appendix C of 
the NIH Guidelines. The current Appendices C-IV through C-VIII (and 
sub-appendices) will be renumbered to Appendices C-V through C-IX, 
respectively.

Appendix C-IV Kluyveromyces Host-Vector Systems

    Experiments involving Kluyveromyces lactis host-vector systems, 
with the exception of experiments listed in Appendix C-IV-A, are exempt 
from the NIH Guidelines provided laboratory-adapted strains are used 
(i.e. strains that have been adapted to growth under optimal or defined 
laboratory conditions). For these exempt experiments, BL1 physical 
containment is recommended. For large-scale fermentation experiments, 
the appropriate physical containment conditions need be no greater than 
those for the host organism unmodified by recombinant DNA techniques; 
the Institutional Biosafety Committee may specify higher containment if 
deemed necessary.

Appendix C-IV-A Exceptions

    The following categories are not exempt from the NIH Guidelines: 
(i) Experiments described in Section III-B, which require NIH/OBA and 
Institutional Biosafety Committee approval before initiation; (ii) 
experiments involving DNA from Risk Groups 3, 4, or restricted 
organisms (see Appendix B, Classification of Human Etiologic Agents on 
the Basis of Hazard, and Sections V-G and V-L, Footnotes and References 
of Sections I through IV) or cells known to be infected with these 
agents may be conducted under containment conditions specified in 
Section III-D-2 with prior Institutional Biosafety Committee review and 
approval; (iii) large-scale experiments (e.g., more than 10 liters of 
culture), and (v) experiments involving the deliberate cloning of genes 
coding for the biosynthesis of molecules toxic for vertebrates (see 
Appendix F, Containment Conditions for Cloning of Genes Coding for the 
Biosynthesis of Molecules Toxic for Vertebrates).

Additions to Appendix D of the NIH Guidelines

    In accordance with Section III-A of the NIH Guidelines, Appendix D 
of the NIH Guidelines will be modified as follows to reflect a recent 
approval for the transfer of a drug resistance trait to a 
microorganism.
    Appendix D-118. Dr. Harlan Caldwell at the Rocky Mountain 
Laboratories may conduct experiments to deliberately introduce a gene 
encoding tetracycline resistance into Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2. 
This approval is specific to Dr. Caldwell and research with this 
resistant organism may only occur under the conditions as specified by 
the NIH Director. This approval was effective as of April 26, 2010.

    Dated: May 6, 2011.
Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay,
Acting Director, Office of Biotechnology Activities, National 
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-11668 Filed 5-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.