Special Local Regulation; Partnership in Education, Dragon Boat Race; Maumee River, Toledo, OH, 27284-27287 [2011-11543]
Download as PDF
27284
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2011–0187; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NE–07–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by June 27,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) CF34–10E2A1; CF34–10E5,
CF34–10E5A1; CF34–10E6; CF34–10E6A1;
CF34–10E7; and CF34–10E7–B turbofan
engines, with a fan rotor spinner part number
(P/N) 2050M34G03; 2050M34G04;
2050M34G05; 2050M34G06; 2437M60G01; or
2437M60G02, installed.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by a fan rotor
spinner support found cracked at the
attachment lugs. We are issuing this AD to
prevent high-cycle fatigue cracking of the fan
rotor spinner support attachment lugs,
leading to separation of the fan rotor spinner
assembly, uncontained failure of the engine,
and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within 1,800
hours-in-service after the effective date of
this AD, unless already done.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
16:26 May 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
Related Information
(k) For more information about this AD,
contact John Frost, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7756; fax: 781–238–
7199; e-mail: john.frost@faa.gov.
(l) Refer to GE Service Bulletin No. CF34–
10E–S/B 72–0186, dated January 31, 2011, for
related information. Contact GE-Aviation,
M/D Rm. 285, One Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215, telephone 513–552–
3272; e-mail: geae.aoc@ge.com, for a copy of
this service information. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
April 28, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–11481 Filed 5–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0211]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Partnership
in Education, Dragon Boat Race;
Maumee River, Toledo, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a permanent Special Local
Regulation on the Maumee River,
Toledo, Ohio. This regulation is
intended to restrict vessels from
portions of the Maumee River during
the Dragon Boat Races which take place
during the third or fourth weekend in
July each year. This special local
regulated area is necessary to protect
race participants from other vessel
traffic.
SUMMARY:
Removal of Fan Rotor Spinner Support
(g) Remove from service the fan rotor
spinner support that operated with the fan
rotor blade retainers removed in paragraph (f)
of this AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
AGENCY:
Removal of Fan Rotor Blade Retainers
(f) Remove from service the 24 fan rotor
blade retainers, P/N 2050M56P02.
Installation Prohibition
(h) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install any fan rotor blade retainer, P/N
2050M56P02, into any engine. Do not
attempt to repair, make serviceable, or reinstall, this part.
(i) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install any fan rotor spinner support
removed in paragraph (g) of this AD, into any
engine. Do not attempt to repair, make
serviceable, or re-install, this part.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0211 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BM1 Tracy Girard,
Response Department, MSU Toledo,
Coast Guard; telephone (419) 418–6036,
e-mail Tracy.M.Girard@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0211),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when the comment is successfully
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
transmitted; a comment submitted via
fax, hand delivery, or mail, will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when the comment is
received at the Docket Management
Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu,
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0211’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0211’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
This special local regulated area is
necessary to protect race participants
from other vessel traffic. The Captain of
the Port Detroit has determined dragon
boat races in close proximity to
watercraft and in the shipping channel
pose a significant risk to public safety
and property. Establishing a Special
Local Regulation around the location of
the race’s course will help ensure the
safety of persons and property at these
events and help minimize the associated
risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to
ensure safety of the public and vessels
during the Dragon Boat Races. This
proposed rule will become effective 30
days after the final rule is published in
the Federal Register. However, the
Special Local Regulation will only be
enforced annually on the third or fourth
Saturday in July from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m.
Vessels seeking to transit through the
area of the race should contact the
Captain of the Port or his or her onscene representative. The on-scene
representative may be present on any
Coast Guard, state or local law
enforcement, or sponsor provided vessel
assigned to patrol the event. The onscene representatives may permit
vessels to transit the area when no race
activity is occurring. Vessel traffic may
proceed down the West side of the river
at a no wake speed during racing. The
races will stop for oncoming freighter or
commercial traffic.
This Special Local Regulation will
encompass all navigable waters of the
United States on the Maumee River,
Toledo, OH, bound by a line extending
from a point on land just south of the
Cherry Street bridge at position
41°39′04.00″ N; 083°31′35.78″ W
straight across the river along the Cherry
Street bridge to position 41°39′11.44″ N;
083°31′44.36″ W and a line extending
from a point of land just north of the
bow of the SS Boyer museum ship at
position 41°38′37.26″ N; 083°31′ 53.86″
W straight across the river to the shore
adjacent to the Owens Corning building
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27285
at position 41°38′38.943″ N;
083°32′3.980″ W.
The Captain of the Port will notify the
affected segments of the public of the
enforcement of this Special Local
Regulation by all appropriate means.
Means of notification may include
publication of Notice of Enforcement
(NOE) in the Federal Register,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and Local
Notice to Mariners.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
that those Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’
under the regulatory policies and
procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude
that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The Special
Local Regulation will be relatively small
and exist for a relatively short time.
Thus, restrictions on vessel movement
within that particular area are expected
to be minimal. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still
transit through the area when permitted
by the Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
27286
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the portion of the Maumee River
discussed above between 6 a.m. and 6
p.m. on Saturdays in July.
This Special Local Regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: This rule will
be enforced for approximately twelve
hours during the one day each year that
it is enforced. In addition, on-scene
representatives will allow vessels to
transit along the Western side of the
river at a slow speed. The race
committee will stop the races to allow
commercial traffic to transit.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact BM1 Tracy
Girard, Response Department, MSU
Toledo, Coast Guard; telephone
(419) 418–6036, e-mail
Tracy.m.girard@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
involves the establishment of a Special
Local Regulation and is therefore
categorically excluded under figure 2–1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction.
During the permitting process for this
Dragon Boat Race event an
environmental analysis is conducted,
and thus, no preliminary environmental
analysis checklist or Categorical
Exclusion Determination (CED) are
required for this rulemaking action. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
2. Add § 100.902 to read as follows:
§ 100.902 Partnership in Education Dragon
Boat Festival, Toledo, OH.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
includes all U.S. navigable waters of the
Maumee river, Toledo, OH, within an
area bound on the north by a line
extending from a point on land just
south of the Cherry Street bridge at
position 41°39′04.00″ N; 083°31′35.78″
W straight across the river along the
Cherry Street bridge to position
41°39′11.44″ N; 083°31′44.36″ W and
bound on the south by a line extending
from a point of land just north of the
bow of the SS Boyer museum ship at
position 41°38′37.26″ N; 083°31′53.86″
W straight across the river to the shore
adjacent to the Owens Corning building
at position 41°38′38.943″ N;
083°32′3.980″ W. (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Special local regulations. The
regulations of § 100.901 apply. No
vessel may enter, transit through, or
anchor within the regulated area
without the permission of the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander.
(c) Enforcement period. These Special
Local Regulations will be enforced
annually on the third or fourth Saturday
of July from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 167
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
[USCG–2010–0833]
Port Access Route Study: In the Bering
Strait; Extension of Comment Period
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of extension of public
comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On November 8, 2010, USCG
published a Notice of Study and request
for comments for the Port Access Route
Study: In the Bering Strait. In this
Jkt 223001
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this notice of
study, call or e-mail Lieutenant Faith
Reynolds, Project Officer, Seventeenth
Coast Guard District, telephone 907–
463–2270; e-mail
Faith.A.Reynolds@uscg.mil; or George
Detweiler, Office of Waterways
Management, Coast Guard, telephone
202–372–1566, e-mail
George.H.Detweiler@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Ms. Renee K.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0833 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2011–11543 Filed 5–10–11; 8:45 am]
16:26 May 10, 2011
Comments and related material
must either be submitted to our online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before September 6, 2011, or reach
the Docket Management Facility by that
date.
DATES:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
action, USCG is providing notice that
the public comment period is extended
until September 6, 2011. This action
will provide the public with additional
time and opportunity to provide the
Coast Guard with information regarding
the Port Access Route Study: In the
Bering Strait.
On
November 8, 2010, USCG published a
Notice of Study and request for
comments for the Port Access Route
Study: In the Bering Strait (75 FR
68568). The comment period in that
document closed May 9, 2011. In this
action, USCG is providing notice that
the public comment period is extended
until September 6, 2011.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27287
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this study by submitting comments and
related materials. All comments
received will be posted, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal information you
have provided.
Submitting comments: If you submit
comments, please include the docket
number for this notice (USCG–2010–
0833), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Notices’’ and insert ‘‘USCG–
2010–0833’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box. Click
‘‘Search’’ then click on the balloon shape
in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you submit
your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit your comments by
mail or hand delivery, submit them in
an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2
by 11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period.
Viewing comments and documents:
To view comments and documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, click on the ‘‘read
comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0833’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. If you do not have access to the
Internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27284-27287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11543]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0211]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Partnership in Education, Dragon Boat
Race; Maumee River, Toledo, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a permanent Special
Local Regulation on the Maumee River, Toledo, Ohio. This regulation is
intended to restrict vessels from portions of the Maumee River during
the Dragon Boat Races which take place during the third or fourth
weekend in July each year. This special local regulated area is
necessary to protect race participants from other vessel traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0211 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BM1 Tracy Girard, Response Department, MSU Toledo,
Coast Guard; telephone (419) 418-6036, e-mail Tracy.M.Girard@uscg.mil.
If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0211), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when the comment is successfully
[[Page 27285]]
transmitted; a comment submitted via fax, hand delivery, or mail, will
be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when the
comment is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail address, or
a telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu, select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0211'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0211'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
This special local regulated area is necessary to protect race
participants from other vessel traffic. The Captain of the Port Detroit
has determined dragon boat races in close proximity to watercraft and
in the shipping channel pose a significant risk to public safety and
property. Establishing a Special Local Regulation around the location
of the race's course will help ensure the safety of persons and
property at these events and help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to ensure safety of the public and
vessels during the Dragon Boat Races. This proposed rule will become
effective 30 days after the final rule is published in the Federal
Register. However, the Special Local Regulation will only be enforced
annually on the third or fourth Saturday in July from 6 a.m. until 6
p.m. Vessels seeking to transit through the area of the race should
contact the Captain of the Port or his or her on-scene representative.
The on-scene representative may be present on any Coast Guard, state or
local law enforcement, or sponsor provided vessel assigned to patrol
the event. The on-scene representatives may permit vessels to transit
the area when no race activity is occurring. Vessel traffic may proceed
down the West side of the river at a no wake speed during racing. The
races will stop for oncoming freighter or commercial traffic.
This Special Local Regulation will encompass all navigable waters
of the United States on the Maumee River, Toledo, OH, bound by a line
extending from a point on land just south of the Cherry Street bridge
at position 41[deg]39'04.00'' N; 083[deg]31'35.78'' W straight across
the river along the Cherry Street bridge to position 41[deg]39'11.44''
N; 083[deg]31'44.36'' W and a line extending from a point of land just
north of the bow of the SS Boyer museum ship at position
41[deg]38'37.26'' N; 083[deg]31' 53.86'' W straight across the river to
the shore adjacent to the Owens Corning building at position
41[deg]38'38.943'' N; 083[deg]32'3.980'' W.
The Captain of the Port will notify the affected segments of the
public of the enforcement of this Special Local Regulation by all
appropriate means. Means of notification may include publication of
Notice of Enforcement (NOE) in the Federal Register, Broadcast Notice
to Mariners, and Local Notice to Mariners.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under that those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that
it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with
other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or
loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The Special Local Regulation will be relatively small and exist for a
relatively short time. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within
that particular area are expected to be minimal. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the area when
permitted by the Captain of the Port.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule
[[Page 27286]]
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the portion of the Maumee River discussed above
between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays in July.
This Special Local Regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: This rule will be enforced for approximately twelve hours
during the one day each year that it is enforced. In addition, on-scene
representatives will allow vessels to transit along the Western side of
the river at a slow speed. The race committee will stop the races to
allow commercial traffic to transit.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact BM1 Tracy Girard, Response
Department, MSU Toledo, Coast Guard; telephone (419) 418-6036, e-mail
Tracy.m.girard@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a Special Local Regulation and is therefore
categorically excluded under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction. During the permitting process for this Dragon Boat Race
event an environmental analysis is conducted, and thus, no preliminary
environmental analysis checklist or Categorical Exclusion Determination
(CED) are required for this rulemaking action. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
[[Page 27287]]
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add Sec. 100.902 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.902 Partnership in Education Dragon Boat Festival, Toledo,
OH.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area includes all U.S. navigable
waters of the Maumee river, Toledo, OH, within an area bound on the
north by a line extending from a point on land just south of the Cherry
Street bridge at position 41[deg]39'04.00'' N; 083[deg]31'35.78'' W
straight across the river along the Cherry Street bridge to position
41[deg]39'11.44'' N; 083[deg]31'44.36'' W and bound on the south by a
line extending from a point of land just north of the bow of the SS
Boyer museum ship at position 41[deg]38'37.26'' N; 083[deg]31'53.86'' W
straight across the river to the shore adjacent to the Owens Corning
building at position 41[deg]38'38.943'' N; 083[deg]32'3.980'' W.
(DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Special local regulations. The regulations of Sec. 100.901
apply. No vessel may enter, transit through, or anchor within the
regulated area without the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
(c) Enforcement period. These Special Local Regulations will be
enforced annually on the third or fourth Saturday of July from 6 a.m.
until 6 p.m.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2011-11543 Filed 5-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P