Central Utah Project Completion Act; Notice of Intent To Accept Proposals, Select a Potential Lessee, and Contract for Hydroelectric Power Development at the Spanish Fork Flow Control Structure, 27342-27344 [2011-11525]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
27342
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2011 / Notices
meet affordable housing needs within
Native American communities.
Recipients of Native American
Housing Block Grants (NAHBG) funds
under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2008 are required
to submit annually the Annual
Performance Report (HUD–52735–AS)
to describe (1) the use of NAHBG funds
during the prior 12-month period; (2)
the actual outcomes and outputs
achieved; (3) program accomplishments;
and (4) jobs supported by NAHBGfunded activities. (Since NAHBG was
authorized under the auspices of
NAHASDA, §§ 102 and 404 apply).
Participants in the IHBG program are
responsible for notifying HUD of
changes to the Formula Current Assisted
Stock (FCAS) component of the IHBG
formula. HUD is notified of changes in
the FCAS through a Formula Response
Form (HUD–4117), as defined at 24 CFR
1000.302. A Tribe, TDHE, or HUD may
challenge the data from the U.S.
Decennial Census or provide an
alternative source of data by submitting
the Guidelines for Challenging U.S.
Decennial Census Data Document
(HUD–4119). Census challenges are due
June 15 of each fiscal year, as defined
at 24 CFR 1000.336. This information
collection is required of participants in
the IHBG program to demonstrate
compliance with eligibility and other
requirements of NAHASDA; provision
of correction or challenge
documentation of the formula
calculation; and provision of data for
HUD’s annual report to Congress. The
information gathered will be used to
allocate funds under the IHBG program.
The quality assurance of data reported
is a very important issue in maintaining
HUD’s databases used to monitor
participant’s proposed plans,
accomplishments, determine program
compliance, and to ensure fair and
equitable allocations. In some cases, the
FCAS information addressing the
conveyances and conversions of units
has resulted in the recouping of funds.
The information collected will allow
HUD to accurately audit the program.
Agency form numbers: HUD–52737,
HUD–52735–AS, HUD–4117, HUD–
4119.
Members of affected public: Native
American Tribes and Tribally
Designated Housing Entities, Alaska
Natives and Corporations, and Native
Hawaiians.
Estimation of the total number of
hours needed to prepare the information
collection including number of
respondents, frequency of response, and
hours of response: The estimated
number of respondents is 579; the
frequency of response is once per year;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 May 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
and the total reporting burden is
estimated at 54,578 hours.
Status of the proposed information
collection: Extension.
Authority: Section 3506 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35,
as amended.
Dated: May 3, 2011.
Merrie Nichols-Dixon,
Deputy Director for Office of Policy, Programs,
and Legislative Initiatives.
[FR Doc. 2011–11518 Filed 5–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Act;
Notice of Intent To Accept Proposals,
Select a Potential Lessee, and Contract
for Hydroelectric Power Development
at the Spanish Fork Flow Control
Structure
Office of the Assistant
Secretary—Water and Science,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Current Federal policy
encourages non-Federal development of
environmentally sustainable
hydropower potential on Federal water
resource projects. The Department of the
Interior (Interior), in consultation with
the Department of Energy, Western Area
Power Administration (Western), will
consider proposals for non-Federal
development of hydroelectric power at
the Spanish Fork Flow Control
Structures of the Central Utah Project
(CUP). Interior is considering such
hydroelectric power development under
a lease of power privilege. No Federal
funds will be available for such
hydroelectric power development.
Western would have the first
opportunity to purchase and/or market
the power that would be generated by
such development under a lease of
power privilege. The CUP is a Federal
Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation)
project under the administration of the
Assistant Secretary for Water and
Science. This notice presents
background information, proposal
content guidelines, and information
concerning selection of a non-Federal
entity to develop hydroelectric power at
the Spanish Fork Flow Control
Structure, and power purchasing and/or
marketing considerations. Interested
entities are invited to submit a proposal
for hydroelectric power development at
the Spanish Fork Flow Control
Structure site for consideration by
Interior.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A written proposal and seven
copies must be submitted on or before
5 p.m. (MST), on October 14, 2011. A
proposal will be considered timely only
if it is received in the office of the
Program Director by or before 5 p.m. on
the designated date. Interested entities
are cautioned that delayed delivery to
this office due to failures or
misunderstandings of the entity and/or
of mail, overnight, or courier services
will not excuse lateness and,
accordingly, are advised to provide
sufficient time for delivery. Late
proposals will not be considered.
ADDRESSES: Send written proposals and
seven copies to Mr. Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Central Utah Project
Completion Act, Department of the
Interior, 302 East 1860 South, Provo, UT
84606–7317. Requests for technical data
should also be sent to Mr. Murray. Any
release of such data will be subject to
applicable Homeland Security laws and
policy.
A copy of the proposal should also be
sent to Ms. LaVerne Kyriss, CRSP
Manager, Western Area Power
Administration, 150 Social Hall
Avenue, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, UT
84111–1580. Information related to
Western’s purchasing and/or marketing
the power may also be obtained from
Ms. Kyriss at the address above, or by
calling (801) 524–6372.
Information related to the operation
and maintenance of the Spanish Fork
Flow Control Structure may be obtained
from Mr. Rich Tullis, Central Utah
Water Conservancy District, 355 West
University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058–
7303; or by calling (801) 226–7122.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Lynn Hansen, (801) 379–1238.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information: The CUP,
Bonneville Unit, located in northern
Utah, was originally authorized for
construction, including hydroelectric
power, by the Colorado River Storage
Project (CRSP) Act of April 11, 1956 (ch.
203, 70 Stat. 105) (CRSP Act). The
Spanish Fork Flow Control Structure
was constructed under the Central Utah
Project Completion Act (CUPCA),
comprised of Titles II–VI of the Act of
October 30, 1992 (106 Stat. 4600, Pub.
L. 102–575). CUPCA also authorized the
construction of other features of the
Bonneville Unit. Section 208 of CUPCA
provides that power generation facilities
associated with the CUP be developed
and operated in accordance with the
CRSP Act, which explicitly embodies all
Reclamation law except as otherwise
provided in the CRSP Act. Section 208
also specifies that water diverted for
power purposes shall only be incidental
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2011 / Notices
to the delivery of water for other
authorized project purposes. The
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
(District), under its contracts with the
United States and under CUPCA has
certain responsibilities and obligations
for the CUP and specifically for the
Spanish Fork Flow Control Structure
including operation, maintenance,
replacement, and repayment.
Interior, in consultation with Western,
is considering hydroelectric power
development at the Spanish Fork Flow
Control Structure through a lease of
power privilege. A lease of power
privilege is an alternative to Federal
hydroelectric power development. A
lease of power privilege is a contractual
right given to a non-Federal entity to use
a Reclamation facility for electric power
generation consistent with Reclamation
project purposes. Leases of power
privilege have terms not to exceed 40
years. The general authority for lease of
power privilege under Reclamation law
includes, among others, Section 5 of the
Town Sites and Power Development Act
of 1906 (43 U.S.C. 522) and Section 9(c)
of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939
(43 U.S.C. 485h(c)) (1939 Act). Interior
will be the lead Federal agency for
ensuring compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
any lease of power privilege considered
in response to this notice. Leases of
power privilege may be issued only
when Interior, upon completion of the
NEPA process, determines that the
affected hydroelectric power sites are
environmentally acceptable. Any lease
of power privilege at the Spanish Fork
Flow Control Structure must
accommodate existing contractual
commitments related to operation and
maintenance of such existing facilities.
The potential lessee (i.e., successful
proposing entity) would be required to
coordinate with the District in the
operation and maintenance of any
proposed hydropower developments
with existing project features.
Western would have the first
opportunity to purchase and/or market
the power that would be generated
under any lease of power privilege.
Under this process, Western would
either purchase and market the power as
Salt Lake City Area—Integrated Projects
(SLCA–IP) power or market the power
independently by first offering it to
preference entities and secondly to nonpreference entities. Western would have
60 days from the date of notification of
selection of a potential lessee in which
to decide whether to purchase and/or
market the power.
All costs incurred by the United
States related to development and
operation and maintenance under a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 May 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
lease of power privilege, including
NEPA compliance and development of
the lease of power privilege, would be
the expense of the lessee. In addition,
the lessee would be required to make
annual payments to the United States
for the use of a Government facility.
Depending on the economic capability
of the proposed hydroelectric
development, this amount will not be
less than 3 mills per kilowatt-hour of
generation. If conditions provide
opportunity for substantial benefit to
accrue to the lessee, then the United
States will benefit proportionally. Also,
under the lease of power privilege,
provisions will be included for inflation
of the annual payment with time. Such
annual payments to the United States
would be deposited as a credit to the
Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.
Interested Parties: Interior will be
available to meet with interested entities
only upon written request to the
Program Director at the above address.
Interior reserves the right to schedule a
single meeting and/or visit to address at
once the questions of all entities that
have submitted questions or requested
site visits. Western will also be available
to meet with Interior and interested
entities to discuss Western’s potential
marketing of hydropower.
Proposal Content Guidelines:
Interested parties should submit a
proposal explaining in as precise detail
as is practicable how the hydropower
potential at the site would be
developed. Factors which a proposal
should consider and address include,
but are not limited to, the following:
A. Provide all information relevant to
the qualifications of the proposing
entity to plan and implement such a
project, including, but not limited to,
information about preference status,
type of organization, length of time in
business, experience in funding, design
and construction of similar projects,
industry rating(s) that indicate financial
soundness and/or technical and
managerial capability, experience of key
management personnel, history of any
reorganizations or mergers with other
companies, and any other information
that demonstrates the interested entity’s
organizational, technical and financial
ability to perform all aspects of the
work. Include a discussion of past
experience in operating and maintaining
similar facilities and provide references
as appropriate. The term ‘‘preference
entity,’’ as applied to a lease of power
privilege, means an entity qualifying for
preference under Section 9(c) of the
Reclamation Project Act of 1939, as a
municipality, public corporation or
agency, or cooperative or other
nonprofit organization financed in
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27343
whole or in part by loans made pursuant
to the Rural Electrification Act of 1936,
as amended.
B. Provide geographical locations and
describe principal structures and other
important features of the proposed
development including roads and
transmission lines. Estimate and
describe installed capacity and the
capacity of the power facilities under
dry, average, and wet hydrological
conditions. Also describe seasonal or
annual generation patterns. Include
estimates of the amount of electrical
energy that would be produced from the
facility for each month of average, dry,
and wet water years. If capacity and
energy can be delivered to another
location, either by the proposing entity
or by potential wheeling agents, specify
where capacity and energy can be
delivered. Include concepts for power
sales and contractual arrangements,
involved parties and the proposed
approach to wheeling if required. To
determine the marketability of the
generated hydropower, Western requires
the following information: cost of
delivered generation in $/megawatthour, including any variations in cost
(on-peak, off-peak, seasonal), including
escalation factors and any other charges;
delivery point and voltage of generation
plus any arrangements the lessee has to
wheel power to an alternate location(s);
the daily, weekly, monthly, and annual
pattern of expected generation under
average, wet, and dry hydrological
conditions; ability of generation to
provide ancillary services such as
regulation, spinning reserves, and voltampere reactive support; and
information on the reliability of the
generation, potential maintenance
outage schedule, and duration.
C. Indicate title arrangements and the
ability for acquiring title to or the right
to occupy and use lands necessary for
the proposed development(s), including
such additional lands as may be
required during construction.
D. Discuss any studies necessary to
adequately define impacts on the CUP
and the environment of the
development. Describe any significant
environmental issues associated with
the development and the proposing
entity’s approach for gathering relevant
data and resolving such issues to protect
and enhance the quality of the
environment. Explain any proposed use
of the hydropower development for
conservation and utilization of the
available water resources in the public
interest.
E. Describe any contractual
arrangements with the entity having
operation and maintenance
responsibility for the CUP feature(s) that
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
27344
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2011 / Notices
are proposed for utilization in the
hydropower development under
consideration. Define how the
hydropower development would
operate in harmony with the CUP and
existing applicable contracts related to
operation and maintenance of CUP
feature(s) being considered for
modification.
F. Identify plans for assuming liability
for damage to the operational and
structural integrity of the CUP caused by
construction, operation, and/or
maintenance of the hydropower
development.
G. Identify the organizational
structure planned for the long-term
operation and maintenance of any
proposed hydropower development.
H. Provide a management plan to
accomplish such activities as planning,
NEPA compliance, lease of power
privilege development, design,
construction, facility testing, and start of
hydropower production. Prepare
schedules of these activities as is
applicable. Describe what studies are
necessary to accomplish the
hydroelectric power development and
how the studies would be implemented.
I. Estimate development cost. This
cost should include all investment costs
such as the cost of studies to determine
feasibility, NEPA compliance, design,
construction, and financing as well as
the amortized annual cost of the
investment; also, the annual operation,
maintenance, and replacement expense
for the hydropower development; lease
payments to the United States; and
expenses that may be associated with
the CUP; and the anticipated return on
investment. If there are additional
transmission or wheeling expenses
associated with the development of the
hydropower development, these should
be included. Identify proposed methods
of financing the hydropower
development. An economic analysis
should be presented that compares the
present worth of all benefits and costs
of the hydropower development.
Selection of the Potential Lessee:
Interior, in consultation with Western,
will evaluate proposals received in
response to this published notice.
Interior may request additional
information from individual proposing
entities and/or all proposing entities
after proposals are submitted, but prior
to making a selection of a potential
lessee.
Interior will give more favorable
consideration to proposals that (1)
utilize water and natural resources in an
environmentally and economically
sound manner: (2) improve ecosystem
function; (3) clearly demonstrate that
the offeror is qualified to develop the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 May 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
hydropower facility and provide for
long-term operation and maintenance,
and (4) best share the economic benefits
of the hydropower development among
parties (including the United States) to
the lease of power privilege. A proposal
will be deemed unacceptable if it is
inconsistent with CUP purposes, as
determined by Interior. Interior will give
preference to those entities that qualify
as preference entities (as defined under
Proposal Content Guidelines, item A.),
provided that their proposal is at least
as well-adapted to developing,
conserving, and utilizing the water and
natural resources as other submitted
proposals and that the preference entity
is well qualified. Through written
notice, all preference entities would be
allowed 90 days to improve their
proposals, if necessary, to be made at
least equal to a proposal(s) that may
have been submitted by a nonpreference entity.
Power Purchasing and/or Marketing
Considerations: Western would have the
first opportunity to purchase and/or
market the power that would be
generated by the project under a lease(s)
of power privilege. Western will consult
with Interior on such power purchasing
and/or marketing considerations.
Western may market the power
available from the project as part of its
Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects
(SLCA/IP) or on a stand-alone basis, first
to preference entities qualified under
criteria established by Western and
second to non-preference entities, by
developing an individual marketing
plan for this power. This marketing plan
would be developed through a separate
subsequent public process beginning
with a notice in the Federal Register of
Western’s intent to market the power.
The marketing plan would include all
aspects of marketing the power,
including assignment of power to
qualified preference and/or nonpreference entities, pricing,
transmission, and delivery of power.
Western would recover the costs it
would incur in purchasing and/or
marketing the power through the rates
charged for the power. Firm power rates
would be established through a public
process, initiated by a notice in the
Federal Register, separate from the
marketing plan.
In the event Western elects to not
purchase and/or market the power
generated by the hydropower
development or such a decision cannot
be made within 60 days of notification
of selection of a potential lessee, the
lessee(s) would be responsible for
marketing the power generated by the
project with priority given to preference
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
entities as heretofore defined in
Proposal Content Guidelines, item A.
Notice and Time Period to Enter Into
Lease of Power Privilege: Interior will
notify, in writing, all entities submitting
proposals of Interior’s decision
regarding selection of the potential
lessee(s). The selected potential lessee(s)
will have five years from the date of
such notification to enter into a lease(s)
of power privilege for the site or sites
identified in the proposal. This period
may only be extended by the United
States in writing.
Dated: May 4, 2011.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2011–11525 Filed 5–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–PWR–PWRO–0215–6786; 8381–1001–
NZW]
Water Resources Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement,
Mojave National Preserve, San
Bernardino County, CA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Intent to Prepare a
Water Resources Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement for
Mojave National Preserve.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with
§ 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
Mojave National Preserve is initiating
the conservation planning and
environmental impact analysis process
needed to inform preparation of a Water
Resources Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement
(WRMP/EIS). This plan is intended to
guide future management of ground and
surface water sources within Mojave
National Preserve. Through this process
the National Park Service (NPS) will
identify and assess potential impacts of
a range of alternatives to management of
water resources. As part of the EIS
process, the NPS will evaluate different
approaches for water resources
management to determine the potential
impacts on land use, water quality,
geology, biological and cultural
resources, human health and safety,
aesthetics, visitor experience,
Wilderness, and other stewardship
considerations.
Mojave National Preserve (Preserve) is
a 1.6 million-acre unit of the National
Park System, established by Congress on
October 31, 1994, by the California
Desert Protection Act. The Act protected
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27342-27344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11525]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Act; Notice of Intent To Accept
Proposals, Select a Potential Lessee, and Contract for Hydroelectric
Power Development at the Spanish Fork Flow Control Structure
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary--Water and Science,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Current Federal policy encourages non-Federal development of
environmentally sustainable hydropower potential on Federal water
resource projects. The Department of the Interior (Interior), in
consultation with the Department of Energy, Western Area Power
Administration (Western), will consider proposals for non-Federal
development of hydroelectric power at the Spanish Fork Flow Control
Structures of the Central Utah Project (CUP). Interior is considering
such hydroelectric power development under a lease of power privilege.
No Federal funds will be available for such hydroelectric power
development. Western would have the first opportunity to purchase and/
or market the power that would be generated by such development under a
lease of power privilege. The CUP is a Federal Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) project under the administration of the Assistant
Secretary for Water and Science. This notice presents background
information, proposal content guidelines, and information concerning
selection of a non-Federal entity to develop hydroelectric power at the
Spanish Fork Flow Control Structure, and power purchasing and/or
marketing considerations. Interested entities are invited to submit a
proposal for hydroelectric power development at the Spanish Fork Flow
Control Structure site for consideration by Interior.
DATES: A written proposal and seven copies must be submitted on or
before 5 p.m. (MST), on October 14, 2011. A proposal will be considered
timely only if it is received in the office of the Program Director by
or before 5 p.m. on the designated date. Interested entities are
cautioned that delayed delivery to this office due to failures or
misunderstandings of the entity and/or of mail, overnight, or courier
services will not excuse lateness and, accordingly, are advised to
provide sufficient time for delivery. Late proposals will not be
considered.
ADDRESSES: Send written proposals and seven copies to Mr. Reed R.
Murray, Program Director, Central Utah Project Completion Act,
Department of the Interior, 302 East 1860 South, Provo, UT 84606-7317.
Requests for technical data should also be sent to Mr. Murray. Any
release of such data will be subject to applicable Homeland Security
laws and policy.
A copy of the proposal should also be sent to Ms. LaVerne Kyriss,
CRSP Manager, Western Area Power Administration, 150 Social Hall
Avenue, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, UT 84111-1580. Information related
to Western's purchasing and/or marketing the power may also be obtained
from Ms. Kyriss at the address above, or by calling (801) 524-6372.
Information related to the operation and maintenance of the Spanish
Fork Flow Control Structure may be obtained from Mr. Rich Tullis,
Central Utah Water Conservancy District, 355 West University Parkway,
Orem, UT 84058-7303; or by calling (801) 226-7122.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Lynn Hansen, (801) 379-1238.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information: The CUP, Bonneville Unit, located in
northern Utah, was originally authorized for construction, including
hydroelectric power, by the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) Act
of April 11, 1956 (ch. 203, 70 Stat. 105) (CRSP Act). The Spanish Fork
Flow Control Structure was constructed under the Central Utah Project
Completion Act (CUPCA), comprised of Titles II-VI of the Act of October
30, 1992 (106 Stat. 4600, Pub. L. 102-575). CUPCA also authorized the
construction of other features of the Bonneville Unit. Section 208 of
CUPCA provides that power generation facilities associated with the CUP
be developed and operated in accordance with the CRSP Act, which
explicitly embodies all Reclamation law except as otherwise provided in
the CRSP Act. Section 208 also specifies that water diverted for power
purposes shall only be incidental
[[Page 27343]]
to the delivery of water for other authorized project purposes. The
Central Utah Water Conservancy District (District), under its contracts
with the United States and under CUPCA has certain responsibilities and
obligations for the CUP and specifically for the Spanish Fork Flow
Control Structure including operation, maintenance, replacement, and
repayment.
Interior, in consultation with Western, is considering
hydroelectric power development at the Spanish Fork Flow Control
Structure through a lease of power privilege. A lease of power
privilege is an alternative to Federal hydroelectric power development.
A lease of power privilege is a contractual right given to a non-
Federal entity to use a Reclamation facility for electric power
generation consistent with Reclamation project purposes. Leases of
power privilege have terms not to exceed 40 years. The general
authority for lease of power privilege under Reclamation law includes,
among others, Section 5 of the Town Sites and Power Development Act of
1906 (43 U.S.C. 522) and Section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of
1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)) (1939 Act). Interior will be the lead Federal
agency for ensuring compliance with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of any lease of power privilege considered in response to
this notice. Leases of power privilege may be issued only when
Interior, upon completion of the NEPA process, determines that the
affected hydroelectric power sites are environmentally acceptable. Any
lease of power privilege at the Spanish Fork Flow Control Structure
must accommodate existing contractual commitments related to operation
and maintenance of such existing facilities. The potential lessee
(i.e., successful proposing entity) would be required to coordinate
with the District in the operation and maintenance of any proposed
hydropower developments with existing project features.
Western would have the first opportunity to purchase and/or market
the power that would be generated under any lease of power privilege.
Under this process, Western would either purchase and market the power
as Salt Lake City Area--Integrated Projects (SLCA-IP) power or market
the power independently by first offering it to preference entities and
secondly to non-preference entities. Western would have 60 days from
the date of notification of selection of a potential lessee in which to
decide whether to purchase and/or market the power.
All costs incurred by the United States related to development and
operation and maintenance under a lease of power privilege, including
NEPA compliance and development of the lease of power privilege, would
be the expense of the lessee. In addition, the lessee would be required
to make annual payments to the United States for the use of a
Government facility. Depending on the economic capability of the
proposed hydroelectric development, this amount will not be less than 3
mills per kilowatt-hour of generation. If conditions provide
opportunity for substantial benefit to accrue to the lessee, then the
United States will benefit proportionally. Also, under the lease of
power privilege, provisions will be included for inflation of the
annual payment with time. Such annual payments to the United States
would be deposited as a credit to the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.
Interested Parties: Interior will be available to meet with
interested entities only upon written request to the Program Director
at the above address. Interior reserves the right to schedule a single
meeting and/or visit to address at once the questions of all entities
that have submitted questions or requested site visits. Western will
also be available to meet with Interior and interested entities to
discuss Western's potential marketing of hydropower.
Proposal Content Guidelines: Interested parties should submit a
proposal explaining in as precise detail as is practicable how the
hydropower potential at the site would be developed. Factors which a
proposal should consider and address include, but are not limited to,
the following:
A. Provide all information relevant to the qualifications of the
proposing entity to plan and implement such a project, including, but
not limited to, information about preference status, type of
organization, length of time in business, experience in funding, design
and construction of similar projects, industry rating(s) that indicate
financial soundness and/or technical and managerial capability,
experience of key management personnel, history of any reorganizations
or mergers with other companies, and any other information that
demonstrates the interested entity's organizational, technical and
financial ability to perform all aspects of the work. Include a
discussion of past experience in operating and maintaining similar
facilities and provide references as appropriate. The term ``preference
entity,'' as applied to a lease of power privilege, means an entity
qualifying for preference under Section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project
Act of 1939, as a municipality, public corporation or agency, or
cooperative or other nonprofit organization financed in whole or in
part by loans made pursuant to the Rural Electrification Act of 1936,
as amended.
B. Provide geographical locations and describe principal structures
and other important features of the proposed development including
roads and transmission lines. Estimate and describe installed capacity
and the capacity of the power facilities under dry, average, and wet
hydrological conditions. Also describe seasonal or annual generation
patterns. Include estimates of the amount of electrical energy that
would be produced from the facility for each month of average, dry, and
wet water years. If capacity and energy can be delivered to another
location, either by the proposing entity or by potential wheeling
agents, specify where capacity and energy can be delivered. Include
concepts for power sales and contractual arrangements, involved parties
and the proposed approach to wheeling if required. To determine the
marketability of the generated hydropower, Western requires the
following information: cost of delivered generation in $/megawatt-hour,
including any variations in cost (on-peak, off-peak, seasonal),
including escalation factors and any other charges; delivery point and
voltage of generation plus any arrangements the lessee has to wheel
power to an alternate location(s); the daily, weekly, monthly, and
annual pattern of expected generation under average, wet, and dry
hydrological conditions; ability of generation to provide ancillary
services such as regulation, spinning reserves, and volt-ampere
reactive support; and information on the reliability of the generation,
potential maintenance outage schedule, and duration.
C. Indicate title arrangements and the ability for acquiring title
to or the right to occupy and use lands necessary for the proposed
development(s), including such additional lands as may be required
during construction.
D. Discuss any studies necessary to adequately define impacts on
the CUP and the environment of the development. Describe any
significant environmental issues associated with the development and
the proposing entity's approach for gathering relevant data and
resolving such issues to protect and enhance the quality of the
environment. Explain any proposed use of the hydropower development for
conservation and utilization of the available water resources in the
public interest.
E. Describe any contractual arrangements with the entity having
operation and maintenance responsibility for the CUP feature(s) that
[[Page 27344]]
are proposed for utilization in the hydropower development under
consideration. Define how the hydropower development would operate in
harmony with the CUP and existing applicable contracts related to
operation and maintenance of CUP feature(s) being considered for
modification.
F. Identify plans for assuming liability for damage to the
operational and structural integrity of the CUP caused by construction,
operation, and/or maintenance of the hydropower development.
G. Identify the organizational structure planned for the long-term
operation and maintenance of any proposed hydropower development.
H. Provide a management plan to accomplish such activities as
planning, NEPA compliance, lease of power privilege development,
design, construction, facility testing, and start of hydropower
production. Prepare schedules of these activities as is applicable.
Describe what studies are necessary to accomplish the hydroelectric
power development and how the studies would be implemented.
I. Estimate development cost. This cost should include all
investment costs such as the cost of studies to determine feasibility,
NEPA compliance, design, construction, and financing as well as the
amortized annual cost of the investment; also, the annual operation,
maintenance, and replacement expense for the hydropower development;
lease payments to the United States; and expenses that may be
associated with the CUP; and the anticipated return on investment. If
there are additional transmission or wheeling expenses associated with
the development of the hydropower development, these should be
included. Identify proposed methods of financing the hydropower
development. An economic analysis should be presented that compares the
present worth of all benefits and costs of the hydropower development.
Selection of the Potential Lessee: Interior, in consultation with
Western, will evaluate proposals received in response to this published
notice. Interior may request additional information from individual
proposing entities and/or all proposing entities after proposals are
submitted, but prior to making a selection of a potential lessee.
Interior will give more favorable consideration to proposals that
(1) utilize water and natural resources in an environmentally and
economically sound manner: (2) improve ecosystem function; (3) clearly
demonstrate that the offeror is qualified to develop the hydropower
facility and provide for long-term operation and maintenance, and (4)
best share the economic benefits of the hydropower development among
parties (including the United States) to the lease of power privilege.
A proposal will be deemed unacceptable if it is inconsistent with CUP
purposes, as determined by Interior. Interior will give preference to
those entities that qualify as preference entities (as defined under
Proposal Content Guidelines, item A.), provided that their proposal is
at least as well-adapted to developing, conserving, and utilizing the
water and natural resources as other submitted proposals and that the
preference entity is well qualified. Through written notice, all
preference entities would be allowed 90 days to improve their
proposals, if necessary, to be made at least equal to a proposal(s)
that may have been submitted by a non-preference entity.
Power Purchasing and/or Marketing Considerations: Western would
have the first opportunity to purchase and/or market the power that
would be generated by the project under a lease(s) of power privilege.
Western will consult with Interior on such power purchasing and/or
marketing considerations.
Western may market the power available from the project as part of
its Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects (SLCA/IP) or on a stand-
alone basis, first to preference entities qualified under criteria
established by Western and second to non-preference entities, by
developing an individual marketing plan for this power. This marketing
plan would be developed through a separate subsequent public process
beginning with a notice in the Federal Register of Western's intent to
market the power. The marketing plan would include all aspects of
marketing the power, including assignment of power to qualified
preference and/or non-preference entities, pricing, transmission, and
delivery of power. Western would recover the costs it would incur in
purchasing and/or marketing the power through the rates charged for the
power. Firm power rates would be established through a public process,
initiated by a notice in the Federal Register, separate from the
marketing plan.
In the event Western elects to not purchase and/or market the power
generated by the hydropower development or such a decision cannot be
made within 60 days of notification of selection of a potential lessee,
the lessee(s) would be responsible for marketing the power generated by
the project with priority given to preference entities as heretofore
defined in Proposal Content Guidelines, item A.
Notice and Time Period to Enter Into Lease of Power Privilege:
Interior will notify, in writing, all entities submitting proposals of
Interior's decision regarding selection of the potential lessee(s). The
selected potential lessee(s) will have five years from the date of such
notification to enter into a lease(s) of power privilege for the site
or sites identified in the proposal. This period may only be extended
by the United States in writing.
Dated: May 4, 2011.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2011-11525 Filed 5-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P
