Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Cooperative Agreement Proposals; English Language Fellow Program for Academic Year (AY) 2012-2013, 27143-27149 [2011-11430]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011–11434 Filed 5–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA–2010–0038]
Future Systems Technology Advisory
Panel Meeting
AGENCY:
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
Notice of Eleventh Panel
Meeting.
ACTION:
May 24, 2011, 10 a.m.–5 p.m.
Location: Hyatt Regency Crystal City,
Arlington, VA, Regency B.
ADDRESSES: 2799 Jefferson Davis
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Type of meeting: The meeting is open
to the public.
Purpose: The Panel, under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972, as
amended, (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the
FACA’’) shall report to and provide the
Commissioner of Social Security
independent advice and
recommendations on the future of
systems technology and electronic
services at the agency five to ten years
into the future. The Panel will
recommend a road map to aid SSA in
determining what future systems
technologies may be developed to assist
in carrying out its statutory mission.
Advice and recommendations can relate
to our systems in the area of internet
application, customer service, or any
other arena that would improve SSA’s
ability to serve the American people.
Agenda: The Panel will meet on
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 from 10 a.m.
until 5 p.m. The agenda will be
available on the Internet at https://
www.ssa.gov/fstap/index.htm or
available by e-mail or fax on request,
one week prior to the starting date.
During the meeting, the Panel may
have experts address items of interest
and other relevant topics to the Panel.
This additional information will further
the Panel’s deliberations and the effort
of the Panel subcommittees.
The Panel will hear Public comments
on Tuesday, May 24, 2011, from 4:30
p.m. until 5 p.m. Individuals interested
in providing comments in person
should contact the Panel staff as
outlined below to schedule a time slot.
Members of the public must schedule a
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
time slot in order to comment. In the
event public comments do not take the
entire scheduled time period, the Panel
may use that time to deliberate or
conduct other Panel business. Each
individual providing public comment
will be acknowledged by the Chair in
the order in which they are scheduled
to testify. Individuals providing public
comment are limited to a maximum
five-minute, verbal presentation. In lieu
of public comments provided in person,
individuals may provide written
comments to the panel for their review
and consideration. Comments in written
or oral form are for informational
purposes only for the Panel. Public
comments will not be specifically
addressed or receive a written response
by the Panel.
For individuals that are hearing
impaired and in need of sign language
services please contact the Panel staff as
outlined below at least 10 business days
prior to the meeting so that timely
arrangements can be made to provide
this service.
Contact Information: Records are kept
of all proceedings and will be available
for public inspection by appointment at
the Panel office. Anyone requiring
information regarding the Panel should
contact the staff by:
Mail addressed to SSA, Future
Systems Technology Advisory Panel,
Room 500, Altmeyer Building, 6401
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21235–0001; Telephone at 410–966–
2203; Fax at 410–966–7474; or E-mail to
FSTAP@ssa.gov.
Dated: May 4, 2011.
Karen Palm,
Designated Federal Officer, Future Systems
Technology Advisory Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011–11240 Filed 5–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7448]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Cooperative
Agreement Proposals; English
Language Fellow Program for
Academic Year (AY) 2012–2013
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/L–12–01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.421.
Key Program Dates: N/A.
Application Deadline: June 24, 2011.
The Office of English Language
Programs of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs announces an open
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27143
competition for proposals to advance
the Bureau’s objectives through support
of academic exchanges that will result
in the improvement of English teaching
capacity around the world and the
enhancement of mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and those of other countries through
exchanges of U.S. English language
educators to all regions of the world.
The English Language Fellow (EL
Fellow) Program sends U.S. educators in
the field of Teaching English as a
Foreign Language (TEFL) on ten-month
fellowships to overseas academic
institutions. The Program brings foreign
English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
Educators to the U.S. for a three-week
workshop/institute including
participation in the annual Teachers of
English to Speakers of Other Languages
(TESOL) Convention. Pending the
availability of Fiscal Year FY 2012
funds, the Bureau anticipates the
placement of approximately 112 English
Language Fellows overseas in AY 2012–
2013. Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code,
Section 26 U.S.C. 501 (c) (3) may submit
proposals to administer and manage the
EL Fellow Program for AY 2012–2013.
I. Funding Opportunity Description:
Authority
Overall Grant and Agreement-making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * * ; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose
The English Language Fellow Program
fosters mutual understanding between
the people of the United States and
those of other countries through
exchanges of U.S. English language
educators. The EL Fellow Program
sends talented, highly qualified U.S.
educators in the field of Teaching
English to Speakers of Other Languages
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
27144
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
(TESOL) on ten-month assignments to
academic institutions in all regions of
the world. Through projects
recommended by U.S. embassies, EL
Fellows share their expertise, hone their
skills, gain international experience,
and learn about other cultures. Upon
returning to the United States, they
share their experiences and acquired
knowledge with their communities and
professional colleagues. Projects are
carried out with host-country ministries
of education, universities, teachertraining institutions, NGOs, binational
centers, and other English language
teaching institutions.
The EL Fellow Program allows
students and teachers at host
institutions to benefit from the EL
Fellows’ expertise and to gain a better
understanding of American values,
representative government, free
enterprise, and the rule of law. EL
Fellows provide foreign educators,
professionals, and students with
communications skills they need to
participate in the global economy and to
improve their access to diverse
perspectives on a broad variety of
issues.
During the program, EL Fellows
typically serve as full-time (up to 20
classroom contact hours per week)
educators assigned to foreign host
institutions and may be engaged in
teacher training, curriculum and
materials development, English for
Specific Purposes (ESP) instruction,
assessment, evaluation, research,
English club or American Corner
programming, summer camps, and other
outreach projects.
The overarching goals of the EL
Fellow Program are to:
• Advance the Department of State’s
mutual understanding objectives;
• Enhance English teaching capacity
overseas in order to provide foreign
teachers and students with the
communication skills they need to
participate in the global economy;
• Allow students and teachers at host
institutions to benefit from the EL
Fellows’ expertise and to gain a better
understanding of American values,
representative government, free
enterprise, and the rule of law; and
• Provide an opportunity for U.S.
English language educators to share
their expertise, hone their skills, and
learn about other cultures, so that upon
returning to the United States, they can
share their experiences and acquired
knowledge with their communities and
professional colleagues.
EL Fellow Eligibility Requirements
• U.S. citizenship;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Master’s degree with focus on
Teaching English as a Foreign or Second
Language (TEFL/TESL), Applied
Linguistics, or relevant field, conferred
no later than end of 2012 spring
semester;
• Minimum of three years of
professional experience in the field of
teaching English to non-native speakers
(one year of experience equals two
semesters of 15–16 hours per week); and
• Teacher training experience (Senior
EL Fellows should have at least four
years of teacher training experience and
one full year of international teaching
experience).
Background
The Bureau seeks to award a
Cooperative Agreement to an applicant
with the ability to achieve these
objectives and that has the necessary
infrastructure and experience
conducting academic exchange
programs. The timing of the award and
the amount of funding for the EL Fellow
Program are subject to the availability of
funds in FY 2012.
EL Fellow Program Guidelines
With the approval of the Office of
English Language Programs, the roles
and responsibilities of the Recipient
administering the EL Fellow Program
are to:
• Design and develop promotional
materials to support advertisement and
recruitment for the EL Fellow Program.
• Conduct an extensive,
comprehensive, and ongoing
promotional and advertising campaign
to recruit qualified and experienced
candidates for the EL Fellow Program.
• Identify and review with the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Office of English Language Programs,
and U.S. embassies, candidates for
approximately 112 EL Fellow projects
selected by the U.S. Department of
State. Qualified staff must interview
candidates and match candidates’ skills
to the needs of specific projects. The
recruitment, selection, and placement
process shall be completed by May 1,
2012.
• Plan and conduct a pre-departure
orientation in Washington, DC in
August 2012.
• Conduct all financial management
aspects of the EL Fellow Program,
including processing of all EL Fellow
grant payments electronically to EL
Fellows’ designated bank accounts.
Maintain an EL Fellow Program budget
spreadsheet.
• Provide fiscal management for EL
Fellows’ professional development
activities during the assignment. These
activities are selected by the Bureau and
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are supported by U.S. embassies and the
Public Diplomacy Offices of the U.S.
Department of State’s Regional
Geographic Bureaus.
• Make all necessary travel
arrangements for the EL Fellows
including reservations and issuance of
tickets.
• Enroll the selected EL Fellows in
the Bureau Accident and Sickness
Program for Exchanges (ASPE) Benefit
Plan.
• Collect EL Fellows’ health
verification forms and arrange for
proper medical clearance by a qualified
medical practitioner.
• Monitor the EL Fellow Program
activities and the EL Fellows, including
emergencies, project performance,
housing, security, terminations, and
making regional site visit(s).
• Prepare and enter into a fellowship
agreement which establishes the terms
and conditions of the 10-month
fellowship including communications,
project performance, terminations, and
other program-related issues.
• Communicate directly with EL
Fellows with regard to fellowshiprelated issues including, in consultation
with the relevant U.S. embassy and host
institution(s), project performance,
emergencies, terminations, reporting,
highlights, and successes.
• Notify and consult with the Office
of English Language Programs (ECA/A/
L) immediately in regard to EL Fellows’
emergencies, evacuations, project
performance, terminations, etc., and act
in accordance to guidance from the
Bureau.
• Develop evaluation and implement
strategies designed to measure the
impact and outcome of the EL Fellow
Program and the effectiveness of each
individual EL Fellow’s professional
activities at his/her designated host
institution(s).
• Maintain information sharing tools
(e.g., Web site/listserv, database, and
social networking media) and provide
EL Fellow information to the Bureau’s
Alumni Office.
• Organize and implement activities
related to the annual TESOL
Convention, including: conducting a
one-week Exchange EFL (English as a
Foreign Language) Educators Fellow
workshop/institute for foreign
participants chosen by the State
Department; arranging for the
workshop/institute participants to
attend the annual TESOL Convention;
and, making all provisions for the Office
of English Language Programs’
networking event at the TESOL
Convention for the workshop/institute
participants and EL Fellow Program
alumni;
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
• Prepare Form DS–2019 and send
the Form to each selected Exchange EFL
Educator Fellow at least 60 days before
his/her departure from his/her home
country for the workshop/institute.
The responsibilities of the Recipient
are clearly detailed in the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI). Due to the diverse
responsibilities involved in
administering the Cooperative
Agreement, the Bureau welcomes the
submission of proposals involving
partnering organizations. In addition to
the primary grantee, these other
organizations may be sub-grantees
responsible for carrying out specific
activities or components of the EL
Fellow Program, such as recruitment,
financial and logistical management,
reporting requirements, pre-departure
orientation, evaluations, clearance of
health verification records, TESOL 2012
related activities, etc. Applicants should
include a minimum of two management
staff with qualifications and experience
in TEFL/TESL or Applied Linguistics.
Applications involving partnering
organizations, if applicable, must clearly
delineate the role each partnering
organization will play and its
responsibilities. Letters of commitment
from any potential partnering
organization(s) must be included.
In a Cooperative Agreement, ECA/A/
L is substantially involved in the
program activities above and beyond
routine monitoring. ECA/A/L activities
and responsibilities for this program are
as follows:
• Providing overall program and
policy design and direction;
• Inviting U.S. embassies to submit
EL Fellow proposals;
• Reviewing and analyzing the ability
of projects to raise the academic
standards of English language teaching
and to promote the Bureau’s public
diplomacy and exchanges goals;
• Analyzing the prospective impact of
projects on host-country English
teaching institutions and the likelihood
of projects meeting host-country
institutional needs;
• Prioritizing and finalizing selection
of projects for which the Recipient will
recruit EL Fellow candidates;
• Reviewing candidates’
´
´
qualifications and resumes;
• Monitoring participants and
program activities;
• Communicating and working with
U.S. embassies to resolve EL Fellow
issues (academic, health, security, etc.);
and
• Reviewing reports of EL Fellow
activities and projects in host countries.
U.S. embassies submit proposals to
the Bureau identifying opportunities for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
27145
placement of Fellows in host-country
institutions in accordance with the
guidance provided by the Bureau. U.S.
embassies are responsible for managing
the EL Fellow Program in-country. The
role of the U.S. embassies includes:
• Selecting host institutions,
including evaluating the security of
prospective sites;
• Establishing viable partnerships
with prospective in-country host
institutions that have critical English
language programming needs;
• Developing project proposals in
consultation with in-country host
institutions to be implemented by EL
Fellows;
• Reviewing applicants’
qualifications and making final
selections of EL Fellow candidates in
consultation with in-country host
institutions;
• Contacting EL Fellows prior to their
arrival to answer questions about workrelated issues, and to ensure that they
have accurate information regarding
housing, visa requirements, security,
etc.;
• Conducting an EL Fellows’ incountry arrival orientation and ensuring
that the EL Fellows receive a security
briefing by the embassy’s Regional
Security Officer;
• Working to maximize participants’
safety and well-being, locating and
securing quality housing, ensuring that
the EL Fellows’ visa/residency status is
adjusted immediately after arrival in
host country to comply with hostcountry immigration regulations, and
acting as the EL Fellows’ and Bureau’s
direct point of contact;
• Conducting site visits and jointly
monitoring EL Fellows’ programs and
activities with the recipient and sharing
of information with the recipient; and
• Selecting nominees (foreign
teachers of English as a Foreign
language) for participation in the 46th
Annual TESOL Convention (TESOL
2012) and related activities in the U.S.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
March 31, 2014.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of the EL
Fellow Program and the availability of
funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is the
Bureau’s intent to renew this
Cooperative Agreement for two
additional fiscal years before openly
competing it again.
II. Award Information
Bureau Cooperative Agreement
guidelines require that organizations
with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding.
ECA anticipates awarding one
Cooperative Agreement in an amount up
to $8,500,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The
Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing
and funding in support of its programs.
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement.
Bureau’s level of involvement in the
EL Fellow Program is listed under
number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2012 (pending
availability of funds).
Approximate Total Funding:
$8,500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award:
$8,500,000.
Floor of Award Range: N/A.
Ceiling of Award Range: N/A.
Anticipated Award Date: October 1,
2011, pending availability of funds.
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost sharing or matching funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
Cooperative Agreement. Cost sharing
may be in the form of allowable direct
or indirect costs. For accountability, the
applicant must maintain written records
to support all costs which are claimed
as contribution, as well as costs to be
paid by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event the applicant
does not provide the minimum amount
of cost sharing as stipulated in the
approved budget, the Bureau’s
contribution will be reduced in like
proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
27146
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
IV. Application and Submission of
Information
Note: Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the
RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Office of English
Language Programs, ECA/A/L, U.S.
Department of State, SA–5, 4th Floor,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20522, telephone (202) 632–9267, fax:
(202) 632–9267, e-mail
williamsoncj@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
L–12–01 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from Grants.gov. Please see section IV.2
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals, and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria, and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify ECA/A/L Program
Officer, Catherine Williamson, and refer
to Funding Opportunity Number ECA/
A/L–12–01 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. Applicant is required to have a
Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a Grant or Cooperative
Agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that the
applicant’s DUNS number is included
in the appropriate box of the SF–424,
which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative,
and budget. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for formatting and
technical requirements. The package
contains the mandatory Proposal
Submission Instructions (PSI) document
and the Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) document.
IV.3c. All Federal award recipients
and sub-recipients must maintain
current registrations in the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) database
and have a Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number. Recipients and sub-recipients
must maintain accurate and up-to-date
information in the CCR until all
program and financial activity and
reporting have been completed. All
entities must review and update the
information at least annually after the
initial registration and more frequently
if required information changes or
another award is granted. Applicant
must have nonprofit status with the IRS
at the time of application. Please note:
Effective March 14, 2008, all applicants
for ECA Federal assistance awards must
include with their application, a copy of
page 5, Part V–A, ‘‘Current Officers,
Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees’’
of their most recent Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax.’’ If the organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a
Grant or Cooperative Agreement from
ECA in the past three years, or if the
applicant organization has received
nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, the applicant must
submit the necessary documentation to
verify nonprofit status as directed in the
PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause the proposal to be declared
technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing the proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critical emphases
on the security and proper
administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) programs and adherence by the
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Recipient and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting, and
other requirements.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: Office of Designation, Private
Sector Programs Division, U.S.
Department of State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA–
5, 5th Floor, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20037.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom, and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into the proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above not have inappropriate influence
in the selection process. Proposals
should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the
full extent deemed feasible.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that the proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire, or
other technique, plus a description of a
methodology to be used to link
outcomes to original project objectives.
The Bureau expects that the Recipient
will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation
questions, including satisfaction with
the program, learning as a result of the
program, changes in behavior as a result
of the program, and effects of the
program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
The evaluation plan should include a
description of the project’s objectives,
the anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when the Recipient intends to
measure these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable time frame), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. The
Recipient should also show how the
project objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP. The
monitoring and evaluation plan should
clearly distinguish between program
outputs and outcomes. Outputs are
products and services delivered, often
stated as an amount. Output information
is important to show the scope or size
of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes, i.e., the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific intended project results to
achieve, and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage the applicant to assess
the following four levels of outcomes as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; such as greater
participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and
explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts
between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of the monitoring
and evaluation plan will be judged on
how well it (1) specifies intended
outcomes; (2) gives clear descriptions of
how each outcome will be measured; (3)
identifies when particular outcomes
will be measured; and (4) provides a
clear description of the data collection
strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups).
(Please note that evaluation plans that
deal only with the first level of
outcomes [satisfaction] will be deemed
less competitive under the present
evaluation criteria.)
The Recipient will be required to
provide reports analyzing the evaluation
findings to the Bureau in the regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV. 3d.4. Describe plans for
sustainability, e.g., overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and embassies.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing the budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The budget request may not
exceed $8,500,000. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. For allowable costs for the
program and complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions,
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27147
please refer to the Solicitation Package
and POGI.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: June 24,
2011.
Reference Number: ECA/A/L–12–01.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals, shipped after
the established deadline, are ineligible
for consideration under this
competition. ECA will not notify the
applicant upon receipt of application. It
is each applicant’s responsibility to
ensure that each package is marked with
a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages
may not be made via local courier
service or in person for this
competition. Faxed documents will not
be accepted at any time. Only proposals
submitted as stated above will be
considered.
Important note: When preparing the
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM.’’
The original and 11 copies of the
application should be sent to: Program
Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM,
Ref: ECA/A/L–12–01, SA–5, Floor 4,
U.S. Department of State, 2200 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20037.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
27148
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Please note: ECA bears no responsibility
for applicant timeliness of submission or data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes for proposals submitted
via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks to complete. Therefore,
applicants should check with
appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connectivity.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting
from transmission or conversion
processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to:
Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the Grants.gov
system and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference
between a submission receipt and a
submission validation. Applicants will
receive a validation e-mail from
Grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau Grant and
Agreement panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other
Department elements. Final funding
decisions are at the discretion of the
Department of State’s Assistant
Secretary for Educational and Cultural
Affairs. Final technical authority for a
Cooperative Agreement resides with the
Bureau’s Grants Officer.
V.2. Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea/
program planning: Proposals should
exhibit originality, substance, precision,
and relevance to the Bureau’s mission.
Detailed agenda and relevant work plan
should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity.
Agenda and plan should adhere to the
program overview and guidelines
described above. Proposal should
clearly demonstrate how the applicant
will meet the program’s objectives and
plan.
2. Ability to achieve program
objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible.
Proposals should clearly demonstrate
how the institution will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
4. Support of diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue, and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials, and follow-up activities).
5. Institutional capacity: Proposed
personnel and institutional resources
should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project’s goals.
6. Institution’s record/ability:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau
Cooperative Agreements as determined
by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior
Recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants.
7. Follow-on activities: Proposals
should provide a plan for continued
follow-on activity (without Bureau
support), ensuring that Bureau
supported programs are not isolated
events.
8. Project evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activities’ success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire, or other
technique, plus description of a
methodology to be used to link
outcomes to original project objectives
is recommended.
9. Cost-effectiveness and Cost
Sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other budgeted items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
10. Professional expertise in teaching
English as a Foreign/Second Language
(TEFL/TESL): The proposal should
demonstrate a publicity and recruitment
plan that allows for the greatest
dissemination of information to
professionals in the areas of teaching
English as a foreign language, Applied
Linguistics, and related fields.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated, and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
documents between the Recipient and
the U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer
and mailed to the Recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
The Recipient shall insert the
foregoing provision in all subagreements under the award.
This provision includes express terms
and conditions of the agreement and
any violation of it shall be grounds for
unilateral termination of the agreement
by the Department of State prior to the
end of its term.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local, and Indian
Governments.’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
‘‘Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations.’’
OMB Circular No. A–102, ‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.’’
OMB Circular No. A–133, ‘‘Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following
reports:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
1. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
2. A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
3. A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
4. A Quarterly Program Report: A
narrative program report describing and
evaluating the activities shall be
submitted within 30 days following
each calendar year quarter.
5. A Quarterly Financial Report: A
financial report using SF 425–FFR to
reflect expenditures shall be submitted
within 30 days following each calendar
year quarter. The report must be
certified by the Recipient’s Chief Fiscal
Officer or an officer of comparable rank.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing evaluation
findings to the Bureau in the regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information).
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Optional Program Data
Requirements: Organizations awarded a
Cooperative Agreement will be required
to maintain specific data on program
participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information, and biographic sketch of
all persons who travel internationally
on funds provided by the Cooperative
Agreement or who benefit from the
Cooperative Agreement funding but do
not travel. (2) Itineraries of international
and domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27149
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Catherine
Williamson, Office of English Language
Programs, ECA/A/L, U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20522, telephone
(202)632–9267, fax (202) 632–9464, email williamsoncj@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/L–
12–01.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: May 3, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–11430 Filed 5–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7449]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals; Access Teacher
Development Online Program
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/L–11–05.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.421.
Key Dates: Application Deadline: June
4, 2011.
Executive Summary: The Office of
English Language Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA/A/L) announces an open
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27143-27149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11430]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7448]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Cooperative Agreement Proposals; English Language Fellow Program for
Academic Year (AY) 2012-2013
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/L-12-01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.421.
Key Program Dates: N/A.
Application Deadline: June 24, 2011.
The Office of English Language Programs of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open competition for
proposals to advance the Bureau's objectives through support of
academic exchanges that will result in the improvement of English
teaching capacity around the world and the enhancement of mutual
understanding between the people of the United States and those of
other countries through exchanges of U.S. English language educators to
all regions of the world.
The English Language Fellow (EL Fellow) Program sends U.S.
educators in the field of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL)
on ten-month fellowships to overseas academic institutions. The Program
brings foreign English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Educators to the
U.S. for a three-week workshop/institute including participation in the
annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL)
Convention. Pending the availability of Fiscal Year FY 2012 funds, the
Bureau anticipates the placement of approximately 112 English Language
Fellows overseas in AY 2012-2013. Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue
Code, Section 26 U.S.C. 501 (c) (3) may submit proposals to administer
and manage the EL Fellow Program for AY 2012-2013.
I. Funding Opportunity Description:
Authority
Overall Grant and Agreement-making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * * ; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose
The English Language Fellow Program fosters mutual understanding
between the people of the United States and those of other countries
through exchanges of U.S. English language educators. The EL Fellow
Program sends talented, highly qualified U.S. educators in the field of
Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
[[Page 27144]]
(TESOL) on ten-month assignments to academic institutions in all
regions of the world. Through projects recommended by U.S. embassies,
EL Fellows share their expertise, hone their skills, gain international
experience, and learn about other cultures. Upon returning to the
United States, they share their experiences and acquired knowledge with
their communities and professional colleagues. Projects are carried out
with host-country ministries of education, universities, teacher-
training institutions, NGOs, binational centers, and other English
language teaching institutions.
The EL Fellow Program allows students and teachers at host
institutions to benefit from the EL Fellows' expertise and to gain a
better understanding of American values, representative government,
free enterprise, and the rule of law. EL Fellows provide foreign
educators, professionals, and students with communications skills they
need to participate in the global economy and to improve their access
to diverse perspectives on a broad variety of issues.
During the program, EL Fellows typically serve as full-time (up to
20 classroom contact hours per week) educators assigned to foreign host
institutions and may be engaged in teacher training, curriculum and
materials development, English for Specific Purposes (ESP) instruction,
assessment, evaluation, research, English club or American Corner
programming, summer camps, and other outreach projects.
The overarching goals of the EL Fellow Program are to:
Advance the Department of State's mutual understanding
objectives;
Enhance English teaching capacity overseas in order to
provide foreign teachers and students with the communication skills
they need to participate in the global economy;
Allow students and teachers at host institutions to
benefit from the EL Fellows' expertise and to gain a better
understanding of American values, representative government, free
enterprise, and the rule of law; and
Provide an opportunity for U.S. English language educators
to share their expertise, hone their skills, and learn about other
cultures, so that upon returning to the United States, they can share
their experiences and acquired knowledge with their communities and
professional colleagues.
EL Fellow Eligibility Requirements
U.S. citizenship;
Master's degree with focus on Teaching English as a
Foreign or Second Language (TEFL/TESL), Applied Linguistics, or
relevant field, conferred no later than end of 2012 spring semester;
Minimum of three years of professional experience in the
field of teaching English to non-native speakers (one year of
experience equals two semesters of 15-16 hours per week); and
Teacher training experience (Senior EL Fellows should have
at least four years of teacher training experience and one full year of
international teaching experience).
Background
The Bureau seeks to award a Cooperative Agreement to an applicant
with the ability to achieve these objectives and that has the necessary
infrastructure and experience conducting academic exchange programs.
The timing of the award and the amount of funding for the EL Fellow
Program are subject to the availability of funds in FY 2012.
EL Fellow Program Guidelines
With the approval of the Office of English Language Programs, the
roles and responsibilities of the Recipient administering the EL Fellow
Program are to:
Design and develop promotional materials to support
advertisement and recruitment for the EL Fellow Program.
Conduct an extensive, comprehensive, and ongoing
promotional and advertising campaign to recruit qualified and
experienced candidates for the EL Fellow Program.
Identify and review with the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, and U.S.
embassies, candidates for approximately 112 EL Fellow projects selected
by the U.S. Department of State. Qualified staff must interview
candidates and match candidates' skills to the needs of specific
projects. The recruitment, selection, and placement process shall be
completed by May 1, 2012.
Plan and conduct a pre-departure orientation in
Washington, DC in August 2012.
Conduct all financial management aspects of the EL Fellow
Program, including processing of all EL Fellow grant payments
electronically to EL Fellows' designated bank accounts. Maintain an EL
Fellow Program budget spreadsheet.
Provide fiscal management for EL Fellows' professional
development activities during the assignment. These activities are
selected by the Bureau and are supported by U.S. embassies and the
Public Diplomacy Offices of the U.S. Department of State's Regional
Geographic Bureaus.
Make all necessary travel arrangements for the EL Fellows
including reservations and issuance of tickets.
Enroll the selected EL Fellows in the Bureau Accident and
Sickness Program for Exchanges (ASPE) Benefit Plan.
Collect EL Fellows' health verification forms and arrange
for proper medical clearance by a qualified medical practitioner.
Monitor the EL Fellow Program activities and the EL
Fellows, including emergencies, project performance, housing, security,
terminations, and making regional site visit(s).
Prepare and enter into a fellowship agreement which
establishes the terms and conditions of the 10-month fellowship
including communications, project performance, terminations, and other
program-related issues.
Communicate directly with EL Fellows with regard to
fellowship-related issues including, in consultation with the relevant
U.S. embassy and host institution(s), project performance, emergencies,
terminations, reporting, highlights, and successes.
Notify and consult with the Office of English Language
Programs (ECA/A/L) immediately in regard to EL Fellows' emergencies,
evacuations, project performance, terminations, etc., and act in
accordance to guidance from the Bureau.
Develop evaluation and implement strategies designed to
measure the impact and outcome of the EL Fellow Program and the
effectiveness of each individual EL Fellow's professional activities at
his/her designated host institution(s).
Maintain information sharing tools (e.g., Web site/
listserv, database, and social networking media) and provide EL Fellow
information to the Bureau's Alumni Office.
Organize and implement activities related to the annual
TESOL Convention, including: conducting a one-week Exchange EFL
(English as a Foreign Language) Educators Fellow workshop/institute for
foreign participants chosen by the State Department; arranging for the
workshop/institute participants to attend the annual TESOL Convention;
and, making all provisions for the Office of English Language Programs'
networking event at the TESOL Convention for the workshop/institute
participants and EL Fellow Program alumni;
[[Page 27145]]
Prepare Form DS-2019 and send the Form to each selected
Exchange EFL Educator Fellow at least 60 days before his/her departure
from his/her home country for the workshop/institute.
The responsibilities of the Recipient are clearly detailed in the
Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI). Due to the
diverse responsibilities involved in administering the Cooperative
Agreement, the Bureau welcomes the submission of proposals involving
partnering organizations. In addition to the primary grantee, these
other organizations may be sub-grantees responsible for carrying out
specific activities or components of the EL Fellow Program, such as
recruitment, financial and logistical management, reporting
requirements, pre-departure orientation, evaluations, clearance of
health verification records, TESOL 2012 related activities, etc.
Applicants should include a minimum of two management staff with
qualifications and experience in TEFL/TESL or Applied Linguistics.
Applications involving partnering organizations, if applicable, must
clearly delineate the role each partnering organization will play and
its responsibilities. Letters of commitment from any potential
partnering organization(s) must be included.
In a Cooperative Agreement, ECA/A/L is substantially involved in
the program activities above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/A/L
activities and responsibilities for this program are as follows:
Providing overall program and policy design and direction;
Inviting U.S. embassies to submit EL Fellow proposals;
Reviewing and analyzing the ability of projects to raise
the academic standards of English language teaching and to promote the
Bureau's public diplomacy and exchanges goals;
Analyzing the prospective impact of projects on host-
country English teaching institutions and the likelihood of projects
meeting host-country institutional needs;
Prioritizing and finalizing selection of projects for
which the Recipient will recruit EL Fellow candidates;
Reviewing candidates' qualifications and
r[eacute]sum[eacute]s;
Monitoring participants and program activities;
Communicating and working with U.S. embassies to resolve
EL Fellow issues (academic, health, security, etc.); and
Reviewing reports of EL Fellow activities and projects in
host countries.
U.S. embassies submit proposals to the Bureau identifying
opportunities for placement of Fellows in host-country institutions in
accordance with the guidance provided by the Bureau. U.S. embassies are
responsible for managing the EL Fellow Program in-country. The role of
the U.S. embassies includes:
Selecting host institutions, including evaluating the
security of prospective sites;
Establishing viable partnerships with prospective in-
country host institutions that have critical English language
programming needs;
Developing project proposals in consultation with in-
country host institutions to be implemented by EL Fellows;
Reviewing applicants' qualifications and making final
selections of EL Fellow candidates in consultation with in-country host
institutions;
Contacting EL Fellows prior to their arrival to answer
questions about work-related issues, and to ensure that they have
accurate information regarding housing, visa requirements, security,
etc.;
Conducting an EL Fellows' in-country arrival orientation
and ensuring that the EL Fellows receive a security briefing by the
embassy's Regional Security Officer;
Working to maximize participants' safety and well-being,
locating and securing quality housing, ensuring that the EL Fellows'
visa/residency status is adjusted immediately after arrival in host
country to comply with host-country immigration regulations, and acting
as the EL Fellows' and Bureau's direct point of contact;
Conducting site visits and jointly monitoring EL Fellows'
programs and activities with the recipient and sharing of information
with the recipient; and
Selecting nominees (foreign teachers of English as a
Foreign language) for participation in the 46th Annual TESOL Convention
(TESOL 2012) and related activities in the U.S.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement.
Bureau's level of involvement in the EL Fellow Program is listed
under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2012 (pending availability of funds).
Approximate Total Funding: $8,500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award: $8,500,000.
Floor of Award Range: N/A.
Ceiling of Award Range: N/A.
Anticipated Award Date: October 1, 2011, pending availability of
funds.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: March 31, 2014.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of the EL
Fellow Program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal
years, it is the Bureau's intent to renew this Cooperative Agreement
for two additional fiscal years before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost sharing or matching funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs. When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an
approved Cooperative Agreement. Cost sharing may be in the form of
allowable direct or indirect costs. For accountability, the applicant
must maintain written records to support all costs which are claimed as
contribution, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal government.
Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value
of cash and in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB
Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost Sharing and Matching. In
the event the applicant does not provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, the Bureau's contribution
will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
Bureau Cooperative Agreement guidelines require that organizations
with less than four years experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
awarding one Cooperative Agreement in an amount up to $8,500,000 to
support program and administrative costs required to implement this
exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its
programs.
[[Page 27146]]
IV. Application and Submission of Information
Note: Please read the complete Federal Register announcement
before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact the Office of English Language Programs, ECA/A/L,
U.S. Department of State, SA-5, 4th Floor, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20522, telephone (202) 632-9267, fax: (202) 632-9267, e-
mail williamsoncj@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/L-12-01 located at the top of
this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from Grants.gov. Please see section IV.2 for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria,
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify ECA/A/L Program Officer, Catherine Williamson, and
refer to Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/L-12-01 located at the top of
this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm or from
the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. Applicant is required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a Grant or
Cooperative Agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-
digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business
entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To
obtain a DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-
866-705-5711. Please ensure that the applicant's DUNS number is
included in the appropriate box of the SF-424, which is part of the
formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative, and budget. Please refer to the Solicitation Package for
formatting and technical requirements. The package contains the
mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the
Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI) document.
IV.3c. All Federal award recipients and sub-recipients must
maintain current registrations in the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) database and have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number. Recipients and sub-recipients must maintain
accurate and up-to-date information in the CCR until all program and
financial activity and reporting have been completed. All entities must
review and update the information at least annually after the initial
registration and more frequently if required information changes or
another award is granted. Applicant must have nonprofit status with the
IRS at the time of application. Please note: Effective March 14, 2008,
all applicants for ECA Federal assistance awards must include with
their application, a copy of page 5, Part V-A, ``Current Officers,
Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees'' of their most recent Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990, ``Return of Organization Exempt From
Income Tax.'' If the organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a Grant or Cooperative Agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if the applicant organization has received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years, the applicant must submit the
necessary documentation to verify nonprofit status as directed in the
PSI document. Failure to do so will cause the proposal to be declared
technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing the proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critical
emphases on the security and proper administration of Exchange Visitor
(J visa) programs and adherence by the Recipient and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing
the administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22
CFR 62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting, and other requirements.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, Private Sector
Programs Division, U.S. Department of State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA-5, 5th
Floor, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom, and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
`Support for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into the proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above not have inappropriate influence in the
selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals
in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
[[Page 27147]]
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that the proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire, or other technique, plus a description of a methodology
to be used to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the Recipient will track participants or partners and be
able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction
with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. The evaluation
plan should include a description of the project's objectives, the
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when the Recipient intends to
measure these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes
are ``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. The Recipient should also show how the project
objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP. The
monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes, i.e., the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific intended project results to achieve, and is usually
measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and outcomes
should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage the applicant to assess the following four levels of
outcomes as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP
(listed here in increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; such as greater participation and responsibility in
civic organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and
new knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants,
community members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of the monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
The Recipient will be required to provide reports analyzing the
evaluation findings to the Bureau in the regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV. 3d.4. Describe plans for sustainability, e.g., overall program
management, staffing, coordination with ECA and embassies.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing the budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The budget request may not exceed $8,500,000. There
must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets. Applicants may provide separate
sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to
provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. For allowable costs for the program and complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions, please refer to the
Solicitation Package and POGI.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: June 24, 2011.
Reference Number: ECA/A/L-12-01.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals, shipped after the established deadline,
are ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify the applicant upon receipt of application. It is each
applicant's responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a
legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important note: When preparing the submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM.''
The original and 11 copies of the application should be sent to:
Program Management Division, ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref: ECA/A/L-12-01, SA-5,
Floor 4, U.S. Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20037.
[[Page 27148]]
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please note: ECA bears no responsibility for applicant
timeliness of submission or data errors resulting from transmission
or conversion processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks to complete. Therefore, applicants should check with
appropriate staff within their organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or determine their registration status
with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your Internet connectivity. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to:
Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726.
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
Grants.gov system and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from Grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau Grant and Agreement panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the
Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding decisions
are at the discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary
for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for a
Cooperative Agreement resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
V.2. Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea/program planning: Proposals should
exhibit originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the
Bureau's mission. Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda
and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described
above. Proposal should clearly demonstrate how the applicant will meet
the program's objectives and plan.
2. Ability to achieve program objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue, and program evaluation) and program
content (orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource
materials, and follow-up activities).
5. Institutional capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or
project's goals.
6. Institution's record/ability: Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau Cooperative Agreements as determined by
Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of
prior Recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
7. Follow-on activities: Proposals should provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (without Bureau support), ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not isolated events.
8. Project evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activities' success, both as the activities unfold and at the end
of the program. A draft survey questionnaire, or other technique, plus
description of a methodology to be used to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended.
9. Cost-effectiveness and Cost Sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other budgeted items
should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-
sharing through other private sector support as well as institutional
direct funding contributions.
10. Professional expertise in teaching English as a Foreign/Second
Language (TEFL/TESL): The proposal should demonstrate a publicity and
recruitment plan that allows for the greatest dissemination of
information to professionals in the areas of teaching English as a
foreign language, Applied Linguistics, and related fields.
[[Page 27149]]
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated, and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing documents between the Recipient and the U.S. Government.
The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer and mailed to
the Recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
The Recipient shall insert the foregoing provision in all sub-
agreements under the award.
This provision includes express terms and conditions of the
agreement and any violation of it shall be grounds for unilateral
termination of the agreement by the Department of State prior to the
end of its term.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), ``Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.''
OMB Circular No. A-102, ``Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-133, ``Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations.''
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following reports:
1. A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
2. A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
3. A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
4. A Quarterly Program Report: A narrative program report
describing and evaluating the activities shall be submitted within 30
days following each calendar year quarter.
5. A Quarterly Financial Report: A financial report using SF 425-
FFR to reflect expenditures shall be submitted within 30 days following
each calendar year quarter. The report must be certified by the
Recipient's Chief Fiscal Officer or an officer of comparable rank.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
evaluation findings to the Bureau in the regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information).
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Optional Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded a
Cooperative Agreement will be required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an electronically accessible
database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a
minimum, the data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information, and biographic sketch of
all persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the
Cooperative Agreement or who benefit from the Cooperative Agreement
funding but do not travel. (2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of travel and cities in which any
exchange experiences take place. Final schedules for in-country and
U.S. activities must be received by the ECA Program Officer at least
three work days prior to the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Catherine
Williamson, Office of English Language Programs, ECA/A/L, U.S.
Department of State, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522,
telephone (202)632-9267, fax (202) 632-9464, e-mail
williamsoncj@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/L-12-01.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: May 3, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-11430 Filed 5-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P