Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, 27048-27049 [2011-11346]
Download as PDF
27048
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
using an improperly operating HEPA
vacuum, and dry sweeping in the work
area.
• Proper handling and transporting of
waste.
• Final visual inspection and post
renovation cleaning verification using
prescribed protocol.
Renovation Recordkeeping
Requirements
Recordkeeping requirements for
renovations are described in detail at
WAC 365–230–340. The renovation
company must maintain records of its
regulated activities for 3 years,
including:
• Any paint testing results.
• Copies of signed pamphlet
acknowledgements forms or other
documentation of delivery.
• Documentation and certification
that renovation requirements were
followed.
• Individual worker training records.
IV. Federal Overfiling
Section 404(b) of TSCA makes it
unlawful for any person to violate, or
fail or refuse to comply with, any
requirement of an approved State
program. Therefore, EPA reserves the
right to exercise its enforcement
authority under TSCA against a
violation of, or a failure or refusal to
comply with, any requirement of an
authorized State program.
V. Withdrawal of Authorization
Pursuant to section 404(c) of TSCA,
the EPA Administrator may withdraw
authorization of a State or Indian Tribal
renovation, repair and painting
program, and/or a lead-based paint prerenovation education program, after
notice and opportunity for corrective
action, if the program is not being
administered or enforced in compliance
with standards, regulations, and other
requirements established under the
authorization. The procedures U.S. EPA
will follow for the withdrawal of an
authorization are found at 40 CFR
745.324(i).
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
List of Subjects
Department of Commerce, State of
Washington, Ecology, Lead, Renovation,
Renovation work practice standards,
Renovation training, Renovation
certification, Renovation notification,
Reporting and record keeping
requirements.
Dated: May 2, 2011.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2011–11437 Filed 5–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission
Federal Communication
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burden invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are
requested concerning: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimate; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) ways to further reduce the
information burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control
Number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid OMB Control
Number.
SUMMARY:
Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2011. If
you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Leslie F. Smith, Federal
Communications Commission (FCC), via
e-mail PRA@fcc.gov or to
Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov.
DATES:
For
additional information the information
collection, contact Leslie F. Smith at
(202) 418–0217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has requested approval of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
this information collection under the
emergency processing provisions of the
PRA, 5 CFR Sections 1320.5, 1320.8(d),
and 1320.13 by May 17, 2011.
OMB Control Number: 3060–0430.
Title: Section 1.1206, Permit-butDisclose Proceedings.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Individuals or
households; Business or other for-profit;
Not-for-profit institutions; Federal
Government; and State, local, or tribal
governments.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 11,500 respondents; 11,500
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 45
minutes (0.75 hours).
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirements; third party
disclosure.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Total Annual Burden: 25,875 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $0.00.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
Impact(s).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Consistent with the Commission’s rules
on confidential treatment of
submissions, under 47 CFR Section
0.459, a presenter may request
confidential treatment of ex parte
presentations. In addition, the
Commission will permit parties to
remove metadata containing
confidential or privileged information,
and the Commission will also not
require parties to file electronically ex
parte notices that contain confidential
information. The Commission will,
however, require a redacted version to
be filed electronically at the same time
the paper filing is submitted, and that
the redacted version must be machinereadable whenever technically possible.
Needs and Uses: The Commission’s
rules, under 47 CFR Section 1.1206,
require that a public record be made of
ex parte presentations (i.e., written
presentations not served on all parties to
the proceeding or oral presentations as
to which all parties have not been given
notice and an opportunity to be present)
to decision-making personnel in
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceedings, such
as notice-and-comment rulemakings and
declaratory ruling proceedings. Persons
making such presentations must file two
copies of written presentations and two
copies of memoranda reflecting new
data or arguments in oral presentations
no later than the next business day after
the presentation; alternatively, in
proceedings in which electronic filing is
permitted, a copy may be filed
electronically.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Notices
On February 2, 2011, the FCC released
a Report and Order and Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, CG Docket
Number 10–43, FCC 11–11, which
amends and reforms the Commission’s
rules on ex parte presentations (47 CFR
Section 1.1206(b)(2)) made in the course
of Commission rulemakings and other
permit-but-disclose proceedings. The
modifications to the existing rules
adopted in this Report and Order
address these problems by requiring that
parties file more descriptive summaries
of their ex parte contacts, by ensuring
that other parties and the public have an
adequate opportunity to review and
respond to information submitted ex
parte, and by improving the FCC’s
oversight and enforcement of the ex
parte rules. The modified ex parte rules
provide as follows: (1) Ex parte notices
will be required for all oral ex parte
presentations in permit-but-disclose
proceedings, not just for those
presentations that involve new
information or arguments not already in
the record; (2) If an oral ex parte
presentation is limited to material
already in the written record, the notice
must contain either a succinct summary
of the matters discussed or a citation to
the page or paragraph number in the
party’s written submission(s) where the
matters discussed can be found; (3)
Notices for all ex parte presentations
must include the name of the person(s)
who made the ex parte presentation as
well as a list of all persons attending or
otherwise participating in the meeting at
which the presentation was made; (4)
Notices of ex parte presentations made
outside the Sunshine period must be
filed within two business days of the
presentation; (5) The Sunshine period
will begin on the day (including
business days, weekends, and holidays)
after issuance of the Sunshine notice,
rather than when the Sunshine Agenda
is issued (as the current rules provide);
(6) If an ex parte presentation is made
on the day the Sunshine notice is
released, an ex parte notice must be
submitted by the next business day, and
any reply would be due by the following
business day. If a permissible ex parte
presentation is made during the
Sunshine period (under an exception to
the Sunshine period prohibition), the ex
parte notice is due by the end of the
same day on which the presentation was
made, and any reply would need to be
filed by the next business day. Any
reply must be in writing and limited to
the issues raised in the ex parte notice
to which the reply is directed; (7)
Commissioners and agency staff may
continue to request ex parte
presentations during the Sunshine
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:02 May 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
27049
period, but these presentations should
be limited to the specific information
required by the Commission; (8) Ex
parte notices must be submitted
electronically in machine-readable
format. PDF images created by scanning
a paper document may not be
submitted, except in cases in which a
word-processing version of the
document is not available. Confidential
information may continue to be
submitted by paper filing, but a redacted
version must be filed electronically at
the same time the paper filing is
submitted. An exception to the
electronic filing requirement will be
made in cases in which the filing party
claims hardship. The basis for the
hardship claim must be substantiated in
the ex parte filing; (9) To facilitate
stricter enforcement of the ex parte
rules, the Enforcement Bureau is
authorized to levy forfeitures for ex
parte rule violations; (10) Copies of
electronically filed ex parte notices
must also be sent electronically to all
staff and Commissioners present at the
ex parte meeting so as to enable them
to review the notices for accuracy and
completeness. Filers may be asked to
submit corrections or further
information as necessary for compliance
with the rules; and (11) Minor
conforming and clarifying rule changes
proposed in the Notice are adopted. The
only changes entailing increased
information collection are the
requirement that parties making
permissible ex parte presentations in
restricted proceedings file an ex parte
notice, and that ex parte notices contain
either a summary of the presentation or
a reference to where the information can
be found in the written record, and that
ex parte notices list all persons
attending the presentation
The information is used by parties to
permit-but-disclose proceedings,
including interested members of the
public, to respond to the arguments
made and data offered in the
presentations. The responses may then
be used by the Commission in its
decision-making. The availability of the
ex parte materials ensures that the
Commission’s decisional processes are
fair, impartial, and comport with the
concept of due process in that all
interested parties can know of and
respond to the arguments made to the
decision-making officials.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2011–11346 Filed 5–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Information Collection Being
Submitted for Review by the Federal
Communications Commission
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and Request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burden and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal
Communications Commission invites
the general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on the following
information collection. Comments are
requested concerning: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimate; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) ways to further reduce the
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid OMB control
number.
SUMMARY:
Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2011. If
you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
the Federal Communications
Commission. To submit your PRA
comments by e-mail send them to:
PRA@fcc.gov.
DATES:
Paul
Laurenzano, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418–1359 or via Internet
at Paul.Laurenzano@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0410.
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27048-27049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11346]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission
AGENCY: Federal Communication Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on the respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to further reduce the information
burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid OMB Control
Number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2011. If you anticipate that you will
be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the
period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC
contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Leslie F. Smith, Federal
Communications Commission (FCC), via e-mail PRA@fcc.gov or to
Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information the
information collection, contact Leslie F. Smith at (202) 418-0217.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has requested approval of
this information collection under the emergency processing provisions
of the PRA, 5 CFR Sections 1320.5, 1320.8(d), and 1320.13 by May 17,
2011.
OMB Control Number: 3060-0430.
Title: Section 1.1206, Permit-but-Disclose Proceedings.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Individuals or households; Business or other for-
profit; Not-for-profit institutions; Federal Government; and State,
local, or tribal governments.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 11,500 respondents; 11,500
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 45 minutes (0.75 hours).
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirements; third
party disclosure.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Total Annual Burden: 25,875 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $0.00.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No Impact(s).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Consistent with the
Commission's rules on confidential treatment of submissions, under 47
CFR Section 0.459, a presenter may request confidential treatment of ex
parte presentations. In addition, the Commission will permit parties to
remove metadata containing confidential or privileged information, and
the Commission will also not require parties to file electronically ex
parte notices that contain confidential information. The Commission
will, however, require a redacted version to be filed electronically at
the same time the paper filing is submitted, and that the redacted
version must be machine-readable whenever technically possible.
Needs and Uses: The Commission's rules, under 47 CFR Section
1.1206, require that a public record be made of ex parte presentations
(i.e., written presentations not served on all parties to the
proceeding or oral presentations as to which all parties have not been
given notice and an opportunity to be present) to decision-making
personnel in ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings, such as notice-and-
comment rulemakings and declaratory ruling proceedings. Persons making
such presentations must file two copies of written presentations and
two copies of memoranda reflecting new data or arguments in oral
presentations no later than the next business day after the
presentation; alternatively, in proceedings in which electronic filing
is permitted, a copy may be filed electronically.
[[Page 27049]]
On February 2, 2011, the FCC released a Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CG Docket Number 10-43, FCC 11-
11, which amends and reforms the Commission's rules on ex parte
presentations (47 CFR Section 1.1206(b)(2)) made in the course of
Commission rulemakings and other permit-but-disclose proceedings. The
modifications to the existing rules adopted in this Report and Order
address these problems by requiring that parties file more descriptive
summaries of their ex parte contacts, by ensuring that other parties
and the public have an adequate opportunity to review and respond to
information submitted ex parte, and by improving the FCC's oversight
and enforcement of the ex parte rules. The modified ex parte rules
provide as follows: (1) Ex parte notices will be required for all oral
ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings, not just for
those presentations that involve new information or arguments not
already in the record; (2) If an oral ex parte presentation is limited
to material already in the written record, the notice must contain
either a succinct summary of the matters discussed or a citation to the
page or paragraph number in the party's written submission(s) where the
matters discussed can be found; (3) Notices for all ex parte
presentations must include the name of the person(s) who made the ex
parte presentation as well as a list of all persons attending or
otherwise participating in the meeting at which the presentation was
made; (4) Notices of ex parte presentations made outside the Sunshine
period must be filed within two business days of the presentation; (5)
The Sunshine period will begin on the day (including business days,
weekends, and holidays) after issuance of the Sunshine notice, rather
than when the Sunshine Agenda is issued (as the current rules provide);
(6) If an ex parte presentation is made on the day the Sunshine notice
is released, an ex parte notice must be submitted by the next business
day, and any reply would be due by the following business day. If a
permissible ex parte presentation is made during the Sunshine period
(under an exception to the Sunshine period prohibition), the ex parte
notice is due by the end of the same day on which the presentation was
made, and any reply would need to be filed by the next business day.
Any reply must be in writing and limited to the issues raised in the ex
parte notice to which the reply is directed; (7) Commissioners and
agency staff may continue to request ex parte presentations during the
Sunshine period, but these presentations should be limited to the
specific information required by the Commission; (8) Ex parte notices
must be submitted electronically in machine-readable format. PDF images
created by scanning a paper document may not be submitted, except in
cases in which a word-processing version of the document is not
available. Confidential information may continue to be submitted by
paper filing, but a redacted version must be filed electronically at
the same time the paper filing is submitted. An exception to the
electronic filing requirement will be made in cases in which the filing
party claims hardship. The basis for the hardship claim must be
substantiated in the ex parte filing; (9) To facilitate stricter
enforcement of the ex parte rules, the Enforcement Bureau is authorized
to levy forfeitures for ex parte rule violations; (10) Copies of
electronically filed ex parte notices must also be sent electronically
to all staff and Commissioners present at the ex parte meeting so as to
enable them to review the notices for accuracy and completeness. Filers
may be asked to submit corrections or further information as necessary
for compliance with the rules; and (11) Minor conforming and clarifying
rule changes proposed in the Notice are adopted. The only changes
entailing increased information collection are the requirement that
parties making permissible ex parte presentations in restricted
proceedings file an ex parte notice, and that ex parte notices contain
either a summary of the presentation or a reference to where the
information can be found in the written record, and that ex parte
notices list all persons attending the presentation
The information is used by parties to permit-but-disclose
proceedings, including interested members of the public, to respond to
the arguments made and data offered in the presentations. The responses
may then be used by the Commission in its decision-making. The
availability of the ex parte materials ensures that the Commission's
decisional processes are fair, impartial, and comport with the concept
of due process in that all interested parties can know of and respond
to the arguments made to the decision-making officials.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-11346 Filed 5-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P