Regulatory Review Schedule, 26967-26968 [2011-11284]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules Bulletin A300–53–229: At the applicable time specified in Table 6 of this AD, or within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do a detailed inspection of the fuselage bonded inner doublers of the longitudinal lap joints in Sections 13 through 18 (except Sections 16 and 17 at Stringer 31 left-hand and righthand) for disbonding and cracking, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. If no disbonding and no cracking is found, repeat the inspection at the applicable intervals specified in Table 6 of this AD. (1) If no cracking is found and ‘‘minor’’ disbonding, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, is found: Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1 year for areas below stringer 22, and at intervals not to exceed 2 years for areas above and including stringer 22. (2) If no cracking is found and ‘‘major’’ disbonding, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, is found: Within 1,000 flight cycles after doing the inspection, repair, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. (3) If any cracking is found, repair prior to further flight, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. (n) For airplanes on which any inspections of the fuselage bonded inner doublers of the longitudinal lap joints in Sections 16 and 17 at Stringer 31 left-hand and right-hand for disbonding and cracking have not been done as of the effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229: Prior to the accumulation of 24,000 total flight cycles or within 12 years since new, whichever occurs first; or within 60 days after the effective date of this AD; whichever occurs later, do a detailed inspection of the fuselage bonded inner doubles of the longitudinal lap joints in Sections 16 and 17 at Stringer 31 left-hand and right-hand for disbonding and cracking, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. If no disbonding and no cracking is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 7 years or 12,000 flight cycles, whichever occurs first. (1) If no cracking is found and ‘‘minor’’ disbonding, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, is found: Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1 year for areas below stringer 22, and at intervals not to exceed 2 years for areas above and including stringer 22. Doing a repair in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997, terminates the repetitive inspections required by this paragraph for that area. (2) If no cracking is found and ‘‘major’’ disbonding, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, is found: Within 1,000 flight cycles after doing the inspection, repair, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:24 May 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 (3) If any cracking is found, repair prior to further flight, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. (o) For airplanes on which any inspections of the fuselage bonded inner doublers of the longitudinal lap joints in Sections 16 and 17 at Stringer 31 left-hand and right-hand for disbonding and cracking have been done as of the effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229; except airplanes on which a repair of that area has been done in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229: Within 7 years or 12,000 flight cycles after doing the inspection, whichever occurs first; or within 60 days after the effective date of this AD; whichever occurs later, do a detailed inspection of the fuselage bonded inner doubles of the longitudinal lap joints in Sections 16 and 17 at Stringer 31 left-hand and right-hand for disbonding and cracking in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– 53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. If no disbonding and corrosion are found, repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 7 years or 12,000 flight cycles, whichever occurs first. (1) If no cracking is found and ‘‘minor’’ disbonding, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, is found: Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1 year for areas below stringer 22, and at intervals not to exceed 2 years for areas above and including stringer 22. Doing a repair in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997, terminates the repetitive inspections required by this paragraph for that area. (2) If no cracking is found and ‘‘major’’ disbonding, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, is found: Within 1,000 flight cycles after doing the inspection, repair, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. (3) If any cracking is found, repair prior to further flight, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997. (p) Although Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–53–0211, Revision 07, dated December 1, 2006; specify to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement. FAA AD Differences Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: (1) Although the MCAI or service information allows further flight after cracks are found during compliance with the required action, this AD requires that you repair the crack(s) before further flight. (2) The MCAI or service information does not include enforceable compliance times for certain actions; however, this AD requires that those actions be done at the enforceable times specified in this AD. (3) Although the MCAI or service information tells you to submit information PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 26967 to the manufacturer, paragraph (p) of this AD specifies that such submittal is not required. Other FAA AD Provisions (q) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 3356; telephone (425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. Related Information (r) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2007–0091, dated April 10, 2007, corrected June 23, 2008; Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–229, Revision 5, dated April 8, 1997; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–53–0211, Revision 07, dated December 1, 2006; for related information. Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28, 2011. Kalene C. Yanamura, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2011–11335 Filed 5–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Indian Gaming Commission 25 CFR Chapter III Regulatory Review Schedule National Indian Gaming Commission. ACTION: Notice of comment periods on preliminary drafts. AGENCY: On November 18, 2010, the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) issued a Notice of Inquiry and SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM 10MYP1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS 26968 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules Notice of Consultation advising the public that the NIGC was conducting a comprehensive review of its regulations and requesting public comment on the process for conducting the regulatory review. On April 4, 2011, after holding eight consultation meetings and reviewing all comments, NIGC published a Notice of Regulatory Review Schedule setting out detailed consultation schedules and review processes. NIGC divided the regulations to be reviewed into five groups, and each group will be reviewed in three phases, the Drafting Phase, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking phase, and the Notice of Final Rule Phase. The purpose of this document is to establish a May 31, 2011, deadline for submittal of written comments on the preliminary draft of the fee regulation and to inform the public that the Commission will provide at least 30 days for written comments on any preliminary drafts circulated by the Commission during the Drafting Phase of the Regulatory Review. DATES: Submit comments on the preliminary draft of the fee regulation by May 31, 2011. ADDRESSES: Comments sent by electronic mail are strongly encouraged. Electronic submissions should be directed to reg.review@nigc.gov. See File Formats and Required Information for Submitting Comments under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, below, for instructions. Submissions sent by regular mail should be addressed to Lael Echo-Hawk, Counselor to the Chair, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lael Echo-Hawk, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100 Washington, DC 20005. Telephone: 202–632–7009; e-mail: reg.review@nigc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 2010, NIGC issued a Notice of Inquiry and Notice of Consultation advising the public that the NIGC was conducting a comprehensive review of all regulations promulgated to implement 25 U.S.C. 2701–2721 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and requesting public comment on the process for conducting the regulatory review. On April 4, 2011, NIGC published a Notice of Regulatory Review Schedule setting out detailed consultation schedules and review processes. The Commission’s regulatory review process establishes three phases of review: A Drafting Phase, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Phase, and a VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:24 May 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 Notice of Final Rule Phase. The Drafting Phase is intended to provide for tribal participation early in the drafting or amendment of any rule with tribal implications. During the drafting phase, the Commission may circulate a preliminary draft, preliminary proposed amendments to a current regulation, or preliminary proposals provided by Tribes or tribal organizations. The Drafting Phase includes an opportunity for the public to provide written comments on preliminary drafts. On April 22, 2011, the Commission released a preliminary draft of amendments to 25 CFR Part 514. This document establishes a May 31, 2011 deadline to provide written comments on the preliminary draft of Part 514. This document also advises the public that any future preliminary drafts of regulations or amendments released by the Commission will include a deadline for the submittal of written comments to the Commission. The Commission intends to provide the public at least 30 days for the submittal of written comments on preliminary drafts. File Formats and Required Information for Submitting Comments If submitting by electronic mail: send to reg.review@nigc.gov a message containing the name of the person making the submission, his or her title and organization (if the submission of an organization), mailing address, telephone number, fax number (if any), and e-mail address. The document itself must be sent as an attachment and must be in a single file and in recent, if not current, versions of: (1) Adobe Portable Document File (PDF) format (preferred); or (2) Microsoft Word file formats. If submitting by print only: Anyone who is unable to submit a comment in electronic form should submit an original and two paper copies by hand or by mail to the address listed above. Use of surface mail is strongly discouraged owing to the uncertainty of timely delivery. Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706(b)(10); E.O. 13175. Tracie L. Stevens, Chairwoman. Steffani A. Cochran, Vice-Chairwoman. Daniel J. Little, Associate Commissioner. [FR Doc. 2011–11284 Filed 5–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7565–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency 44 CFR Part 67 [Docket ID FEMA–2011–0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1192] Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: Comments are requested on the proposed Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed BFE modifications for the communities listed in the table below. The purpose of this proposed rule is to seek general information and comment regarding the proposed regulatory flood elevations for the reach described by the downstream and upstream locations in the table below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are a part of the floodplain management measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, these elevations, once finalized, will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the contents in those buildings. DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before August 8, 2011. ADDRESSES: The corresponding preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each community is available for inspection at the community’s map repository. The respective addresses are listed in the table below. You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–1192, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (e-mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (e-mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM 10MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26967-26968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11284]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Indian Gaming Commission

25 CFR Chapter III


Regulatory Review Schedule

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Notice of comment periods on preliminary drafts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 18, 2010, the National Indian Gaming Commission 
(NIGC) issued a Notice of Inquiry and

[[Page 26968]]

Notice of Consultation advising the public that the NIGC was conducting 
a comprehensive review of its regulations and requesting public comment 
on the process for conducting the regulatory review. On April 4, 2011, 
after holding eight consultation meetings and reviewing all comments, 
NIGC published a Notice of Regulatory Review Schedule setting out 
detailed consultation schedules and review processes. NIGC divided the 
regulations to be reviewed into five groups, and each group will be 
reviewed in three phases, the Drafting Phase, the Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking phase, and the Notice of Final Rule Phase.
    The purpose of this document is to establish a May 31, 2011, 
deadline for submittal of written comments on the preliminary draft of 
the fee regulation and to inform the public that the Commission will 
provide at least 30 days for written comments on any preliminary drafts 
circulated by the Commission during the Drafting Phase of the 
Regulatory Review.

DATES: Submit comments on the preliminary draft of the fee regulation 
by May 31, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Comments sent by electronic mail are strongly encouraged. 
Electronic submissions should be directed to reg.review@nigc.gov. See 
File Formats and Required Information for Submitting Comments under 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, below, for instructions. Submissions sent by 
regular mail should be addressed to Lael Echo-Hawk, Counselor to the 
Chair, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 
9100, Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lael Echo-Hawk, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100 Washington, DC 20005. 
Telephone: 202-632-7009; e-mail: reg.review@nigc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 2010, NIGC issued a Notice 
of Inquiry and Notice of Consultation advising the public that the NIGC 
was conducting a comprehensive review of all regulations promulgated to 
implement 25 U.S.C. 2701-2721 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 
(IGRA) and requesting public comment on the process for conducting the 
regulatory review. On April 4, 2011, NIGC published a Notice of 
Regulatory Review Schedule setting out detailed consultation schedules 
and review processes.
    The Commission's regulatory review process establishes three phases 
of review: A Drafting Phase, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Phase, and 
a Notice of Final Rule Phase. The Drafting Phase is intended to provide 
for tribal participation early in the drafting or amendment of any rule 
with tribal implications. During the drafting phase, the Commission may 
circulate a preliminary draft, preliminary proposed amendments to a 
current regulation, or preliminary proposals provided by Tribes or 
tribal organizations. The Drafting Phase includes an opportunity for 
the public to provide written comments on preliminary drafts. On April 
22, 2011, the Commission released a preliminary draft of amendments to 
25 CFR Part 514. This document establishes a May 31, 2011 deadline to 
provide written comments on the preliminary draft of Part 514.
    This document also advises the public that any future preliminary 
drafts of regulations or amendments released by the Commission will 
include a deadline for the submittal of written comments to the 
Commission. The Commission intends to provide the public at least 30 
days for the submittal of written comments on preliminary drafts.

File Formats and Required Information for Submitting Comments

    If submitting by electronic mail: send to reg.review@nigc.gov a 
message containing the name of the person making the submission, his or 
her title and organization (if the submission of an organization), 
mailing address, telephone number, fax number (if any), and e-mail 
address. The document itself must be sent as an attachment and must be 
in a single file and in recent, if not current, versions of: (1) Adobe 
Portable Document File (PDF) format (preferred); or (2) Microsoft Word 
file formats.
    If submitting by print only: Anyone who is unable to submit a 
comment in electronic form should submit an original and two paper 
copies by hand or by mail to the address listed above. Use of surface 
mail is strongly discouraged owing to the uncertainty of timely 
delivery.

    Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706(b)(10); E.O. 13175.

Tracie L. Stevens,
Chairwoman.
Steffani A. Cochran,
Vice-Chairwoman.
Daniel J. Little,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2011-11284 Filed 5-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.