Butte County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC), 26240-26241 [2011-11079]

Download as PDF 26240 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2011 / Notices Purpose and Need for Action The Purpose and Need for the Cobbler II Timber Sale and Fuels Reduction SEIS is the same as identified within the Cobbler II Timber Sale and Fuels Reduction Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on pages 1–4 and 1–5. The Forest Service is preparing this Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to clarify and revise sections of the environmental analysis conducted for the original October 2010 Cobbler II FEIS. Proposed Action The actions proposed and analyzed in the Cobbler II FEIS will not change in the SEIS. The Umatilla National Forest proposes to supplement the following analysis to that which was originally presented in the Cobbler II Timber Sale and Fuels Reduction FEIS (October 2010). • Chapter 1 Æ Minor editorial changes and additional clarifying information. • Chapter 2 Æ Minor editorial changes and additional clarifying information. • Chapter 3 Æ Clarification of cumulative effects analysis for all resources . Æ Revision of wildlife environmental effects section. Æ Revision of vegetation environmetal effects section. Æ Other editorial changes and additional clarifying information. The supplemental information presented within the SEIS will replace the corresponding information found in the October 2010 Cobbler II FEIS. For example, the revised wildlife environmental effects section of the SEIS will replace the wildlife environmental effects section of the FEIS. All other areas of the anlaysis that are not identified for supplementation within the SEIS will remain unaltered from its presentation in the FEIS. In this manner the SEIS and FEIS will be companion documents. Responsible Official Forest Supervisor for the Umatilla National Forest, Kevin Martin. emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Nature of Decision To Be Made The decisions to be made include: 1. Whether a Forest Plan amendment should occur at this time? 2. Whether harvest and prescribed landscape fire along with associated activities should occur, and if so, how much and where? 3. Whether other vegetation management activities (hardwood restoration, meadow restoration, and VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:26 May 05, 2011 Jkt 223001 non-commercial thinning) and their associated activities should occur and when should they occur? 4. What monitoring or mitigation measures should be taken or needed? Opportunity to Comment This notice is for a supplemental EIS, and therefore no further scoping is necessary (40 CFR 1502.9 (ii)(4)). The public has had several formal opportunities to comment on this project prior to the initiation of this SEIS. The public will be provided a formal opportunity to comment when the Draft SEIS is released in June 2011. Comments received in response to this notice, including names and addresses of those who comment, will become part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent administrative review or judicial review. Dated: April 28, 2011. Kevin Martin, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2011–11097 Filed 5–5–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Big Horn County Resource Advisory Committee Forest Service, USDA. Notice of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: The Big Horn County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Greybull, Wyoming. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110– 343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose is to hold the fourth meeting and to vote on project proposals. DATES: The meeting will be held on June 2, 2011, and will begin at 10 a.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Big Horn County Weed and Pest Building, 4782 Highway 310, Greybull, Wyoming. Written comments about this meeting should be sent to Laurie Walters-Clark, Bighorn National Forest, 2013 Eastside 2nd Street, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to comments-bighorn@ fs.fed.us, with the words Big Horn County RAC in the subject line. Facsimilies may be sent to 307–674– 2668. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for public inspection and copying. The public may inspect comments received at Bighorn National Forest, 2013 Eastside 2nd Street, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 307–674–2600 to facilitate entry into the building. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurie Walters-Clark, RAC Coordinator, USDA, Bighorn National Forest, 2013 Eastside 2nd Street, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801; (307) 674–2627. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the hearing impaired may call 1–307–674– 2604 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Mountain time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The following business will be conducted: (1) Introductions of all committee members and Forest Service personnel, (2) Finalization and approval of Project Evaluation Criteria, (3) Project reviews, and (4) Public Comment, and (5) Project voting for recommendation. Persons who wish to bring related matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Dated: April 29, 2011. William T. Bass, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2011–11093 Filed 5–5–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Butte County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) Forest Service, USDA. Notice of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: The Butte County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold a meeting on May 23, 2011 in Oroville, CA. The purpose of the meeting is to: Review Secure Rural Schools legislation, Sec. 204 (f) and discuss the 50% watershed restoration/road maintenance funding goal; discuss developing a process for providing partial funding; discuss requiring a maximum request amount; review and discuss examples of watershed/stream restoration and road maintenance projects along with monitoring projects such as GPS/GIS mapping; review funding Cycle 2 application and instructions and discuss improvements as necessary; review a timeline for Cycle SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2011 / Notices 2 project funding and schedule out meeting(s). The funding is made available under Title II provisions of the Secure Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000. DATE AND ADDRESS: The meeting will take place from 6:30–9 p.m. at the Feather River Ranger District Office, 875 Mitchell Avenue, Oroville, CA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (or for special needs): Lee Anne Schramel Taylor, Forest Coordinator, USDA, Plumas National Forest, P.O. Box 11500/159 Lawrence Street, Quincy, CA 95971; (530) 283–7850; or by E-MAIL eataylor@fs.fed.us. Other RAC information may be obtained at https:// www.fs.usda.gov and https:// www.fs.fed.us/srs. Dated: April 29, 2011. Matt Janowiak, Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2011–11079 Filed 5–5–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–822] Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Administrative Review Pursuant to Court Decision Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 26, 2011, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) sustained the Department of Commerce’s (the Department’s) results of redetermination pursuant to the CIT’s remand order in Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United States, 675 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (CIT 2010). The Department is notifying the public that the final CIT judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s final results and is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Thailand covering the period of review (POR) of February 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007. DATES: Effective Date: May 6, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration—International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:26 May 05, 2011 Jkt 223001 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202) 482–4929. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 29, 2008, the Department published its final results in the antidumping duty administrative review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Thailand covering the POR of February 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 50933 (August 29, 2008) (Final Results). In the Final Results, the Department determined that the Rubicon Group 1 was not entitled to a constructed export price (CEP) offset. On October 24, 2008, the Rubicon Group filed a complaint with the Court challenging the Department’s determination that the Rubicon Group was not entitled to a CEP offset. On July 17, 2009, the Department requested a voluntary remand to reconsider and further explain the CEP offset issue. On December 29, 2009, the Court granted the Department’s request to reconsider and further explain its decision as to whether the Rubicon Group is entitled to a CEP offset. On June 18, 2010, the Department issued its final results of redetermination. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, dated June 18, 2010 (Remand Results) (available at https:// ia.ita.doc.gov/remands). The remand redetermination explained that, pursuant to the Court’s remand order, the Department reconsidered the CEP offset issue with respect to the Rubicon Group and determined that the Rubicon Group was entitled to a CEP offset adjustment to normal value in the 2006– 2007 administrative review. On April 26, 2011, the CIT sustained the Remand Results. See Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Court No. 08– 00330, Slip Op. 11–46 (April 26, 2011). Timken Notice Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F. 2d 337 (CAFC 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F. 3d 1374 (CAFC 2010), pursuant to section 516A(c) of the Tariff 1 This group is comprised of the following companies: Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd., Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Chanthaburi Seafoods Co., Ltd., Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd., Phatthana Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Thailand Fishery Cold Storage Public Co., Ltd., Thai International Seafood Co., Ltd., and Rubicon Resources, LLC (collectively, the Rubicon Group). PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26241 Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s April 26, 2011, judgment sustaining the Department’s Remand Results with respect to the Rubicon Group constitutes a final decision of that court that is not in harmony with the Departments Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly, the Department will continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision. Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court decision with respect to the Rubicon Group, the Department amends its Final Results, and the weighted-average margin for the Rubicon Group for the period February 1, 2006, through January 31, 2007, is 3.00 percent. In the event the CIT’s ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on entries of the subject merchandise exported during the POR from the Rubicon Group based on the revised assessment rates calculated by the Department. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 2, 2011. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2011–11119 Filed 5–5–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–821] Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: May 6, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dustin Ross, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26240-26241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Butte County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Butte County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold a 
meeting on May 23, 2011 in Oroville, CA. The purpose of the meeting is 
to: Review Secure Rural Schools legislation, Sec. 204 (f) and discuss 
the 50% watershed restoration/road maintenance funding goal; discuss 
developing a process for providing partial funding; discuss requiring a 
maximum request amount; review and discuss examples of watershed/stream 
restoration and road maintenance projects along with monitoring 
projects such as GPS/GIS mapping; review funding Cycle 2 application 
and instructions and discuss improvements as necessary; review a 
timeline for Cycle

[[Page 26241]]

2 project funding and schedule out meeting(s).
    The funding is made available under Title II provisions of the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000.

Date and Address: The meeting will take place from 6:30-9 p.m. at the 
Feather River Ranger District Office, 875 Mitchell Avenue, Oroville, 
CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (or for special needs): Lee Anne 
Schramel Taylor, Forest Coordinator, USDA, Plumas National Forest, P.O. 
Box 11500/159 Lawrence Street, Quincy, CA 95971; (530) 283-7850; or by 
E-MAIL eataylor@fs.fed.us. Other RAC information may be obtained at 
https://www.fs.usda.gov and https://www.fs.fed.us/srs.

    Dated: April 29, 2011.
Matt Janowiak,
Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-11079 Filed 5-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.