Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District (NSCAPCD) and Mendocino County Air Quality Management District (MCAQMD), 26224-26225 [2011-11035]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
26224
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
commercial grid power extending
beyond a month, it is likely that water
in spent fuel pools would heat up and
boil off, fuel rods would become
uncovered by water, zirconium cladding
would catch fire, and large amounts of
dangerous radionuclides would be
released into the atmosphere.’’
The petitioner states that ‘‘a primary
rationale for this proposed amendment
is a recently documented vulnerability
of the North American power grids to
severe space weather which could cause
multiple-year power outages.’’ In
addition, the petitioner states that ‘‘a
government-sponsored study of secondorder effects of commercial grid failure
on petrochemical fuel and food supplies
shows that any assumption of outside
assistance to nuclear power plants,
including resupply of diesel fuel and
food, may not be valid.’’ The risks to the
North American commercial grids from
space weather and geomagnetic
disturbance, and the effects of a
commercial outage on the petrochemical
fuel resupply and food and water
supply are discussed in the petition.
The petition also expresses the
petitioner’s views on: (1) The necessity
for the Department of Homeland
Security to include in its National
Security Guidelines a scenario for
severe space weather and geomagnetic
disturbance and the associated longterm and widespread commercial grid
outage; (2) the August 1988 Oak Ridge
National Laboratory (ORNL) and NRC
Report ORNL/NRC/LTR–98/12,
‘‘Evaluation of the Reliability for the
Offsite Power Supply as a Contributor to
the Risk of Nuclear Plants’’; (3) the
regulatory actions after the 2003
northeastern blackout; (4) the necessity
for the North American Electric
Reliability Council to publish a
reliability standard for geomagnetic
disturbance; and (5) the role of other
Government agencies in protecting
‘‘public health and safety in regard to
geomagnetic disturbance.’’
In addition, the petitioner discusses
the NRC’s probabilistic risk assessment
(PRA) in NUREG–1738, ‘‘Technical
Study of Spent Fuel Pool Accident Risk
at Decommissioning Nuclear Power
Plants,’’ February 2001, and proposes a
‘‘PRA to more precisely gauge the
probability of zirconium fires at spent
fuel pools due to geomagnetic
disturbance and resulting long-term
Loss of Outside Power (LOOP).’’ The
petitioner stated that the purpose of the
PRA is ‘‘to show that an amendment to
the CFR is required.’’
The Petition
The petitioner requests that the NRC
amend its regulations in 10 CFR Part 50
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 May 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
to require licensees to provide reliable
emergency systems to assure long-term
cooling and water makeup for spent fuel
pools using only onsite power sources.
Specifically, the petitioner proposes
amending 10 CFR Part 50 to require that
the emergency systems be able to
operate for a period of 2 years without
human operator intervention and
without offsite fuel resupply and that
backup power systems for spent fuel
pools be electrically isolated from other
plant electrical systems during normal
and emergency operation. In addition,
the petitioner requests the NRC revise
its requirements to state if weatherdependent power sources are used,
sufficient water or power storage must
be provided to maintain continual
cooling during weather conditions
which may temporarily constrict power
generation.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of May 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–11112 Filed 5–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0302; FRL–9292–5]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Northern
Sonoma County Air Pollution Control
District (NSCAPCD) and Mendocino
County Air Quality Management
District (MCAQMD)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Northern Sonoma
County Air Pollution Control District
(NSCAPCD) and Mendocino County Air
Quality Management District
(MCAQMD) portions of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). Both
districts are required under Part C of
title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to
adopt and implement SIP-approved
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) permit programs. These proposed
revisions update the definitions used in
the districts’ PSD permit programs.
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by June 6, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2011–0302, by one of the
following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. E-mail: R9airpermits@epa.gov
3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air3), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: EPA has established a docket
for this action under EPA–R09–OAR–
2011–0302. Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed at
https://www.regulations.gov, some
information may be publicly available
only at the hard copy location (e.g.,
copyrighted material, large maps, multivolume reports) and some may not be
available in either location (e.g.,
confidential business information
(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal addresses the following local
rules: Northern Sonoma County Air
Pollution Control District (NSCAPCD)
Rule 130—Definitions and Mendocino
County Air Quality Management District
(MCAQMD) Rule 130—Definitions. In
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, we are approving
these local rules in a direct final action
without prior proposal because we
believe these SIP revisions are not
controversial. If we receive adverse
comments, however, we will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this
proposed rule. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: March 31, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2011–11035 Filed 5–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0630; FRL–8871–7]
RIN 2070–AJ71
Elemental Mercury Used in
Barometers, Manometers,
Hygrometers/Psychrometers;
Significant New Use Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing a significant
new use rule (SNUR) under section
5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) for elemental mercury for
use in barometers, manometers, and
hygrometers/psychrometers. This action
would require persons who intend to
manufacture (including import) or
process elemental mercury for an
activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this proposed
rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity. The required
notification would provide EPA with
the opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
that activity before it occurs. Not
included in this proposed SNUR is
mercury use in barometers, manometers,
and hygrometers/psychrometers when
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 May 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
they are in service as of the publication
date of this proposed rule and mercury
use in portable battery-powered motoraspirated psychrometers that contain
fewer than seven grams of elemental
mercury because they are currently
manufactured. For this proposed rule,
the general SNUR exemption for
persons that import or process chemical
substances as part of an article at
§ 721.45(f) would not apply.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0630, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0630.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2010–0630. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26225
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm.
3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Docket visitors are required
to show photographic identification,
pass through a metal detector, and sign
the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are
processed through an X-ray machine
and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times in the building and
returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Sue
Slotnick, National Program Chemicals
Division (7404T), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (202) 556–
1973; e-mail address:
slotnick.sue@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; e-mail address:
TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture (defined
by statute to include import) or process
elemental mercury used in barometers,
manometers, or hygrometers/
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26224-26225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11035]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0302; FRL-9292-5]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Northern
Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District (NSCAPCD) and Mendocino
County Air Quality Management District (MCAQMD)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Northern Sonoma
County Air Pollution Control District (NSCAPCD) and Mendocino County
Air Quality Management District (MCAQMD) portions of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). Both districts are required under Part
C of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to adopt and implement SIP-
approved Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit programs.
These proposed revisions update the definitions used in the districts'
PSD permit programs.
DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by June 6, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2011-0302, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
2. E-mail: R9airpermits@epa.gov
3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air-3), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: EPA has established a docket for this action under EPA-R09-
OAR-2011-0302. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports)
and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential
business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules: Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District (NSCAPCD)
Rule 130--Definitions and Mendocino County Air Quality Management
District (MCAQMD) Rule 130--Definitions. In
[[Page 26225]]
the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are
approving these local rules in a direct final action without prior
proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial.
If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.
Dated: March 31, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2011-11035 Filed 5-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P