Hours of Service Exception for Railroad Signal Employees, 25588-25590 [2011-11018]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
25588
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(i) The pipeline is a Category 1 rural
low-stress pipeline;
(ii) The pipeline carries crude oil from
a production facility;
(iii) The pipeline, when in operation,
operates at a flow rate less than or equal
to 14,000 barrels per day; and
(iv) The operator determines it would
abandon or shut-down the pipeline as a
result of the economic burden to comply
with the assessment requirements in
§ 195.452(d) or 195.452(j).
(2) A notification submitted under
this provision must include, at
minimum, the following information
about the pipeline: its operating,
maintenance and leak history; the
estimated cost to comply with the
integrity assessment requirements (with
a brief description of the basis for the
estimate); the estimated amount of
production from affected wells per year,
whether wells will be shut in or
alternate transportation used, and if
alternate transportation will be used, the
estimated cost to do so.
(3) When an operator notifies PHMSA
in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of
this Section, PHMSA will stay
compliance with §§ 195.452(d) and
195.452(j)(3) until it has completed an
analysis of the notification. PHMSA will
consult the Department of Energy, as
appropriate, to help analyze the
potential energy impact of loss of the
pipeline. Based on the analysis, PHMSA
may grant the operator a special permit
to allow continued operation of the
pipeline subject to alternative safety
requirements.
(e) Changes in unusually sensitive
areas.
(1) If, after June 3, 2008, for Category
1 rural low-stress pipelines or October
1, 2011 for Category 2 rural low-stress
pipelines, an operator identifies a new
USA that causes a segment of pipeline
to meet the criteria in paragraph (b) of
this Section as a Category 1 or Category
2 rural low-stress pipeline, the operator
must:
(i) Comply with the IM program
requirement in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)
or (c)(2)(iii)(A) of this Section, as
appropriate, within 12 months
following the date the area is identified
regardless of the prior categorization of
the pipeline; and
(ii) Complete the baseline assessment
required by paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(C) or
(c)(2)(iii)(C) of this Section, as
appropriate, according to the schedule
in § 195.452(d)(3).
(2) If a change to the boundaries of a
USA causes a Category 1 or Category 2
pipeline segment to no longer be within
one-half mile of a USA, an operator
must continue to comply with
paragraph (c)(1)(iii) or paragraph
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 May 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
(c)(2)(iii) of this section, as applicable,
with respect to that segment unless the
operator determines that a release from
the pipeline could not affect the USA.
(f) Record Retention. An operator
must maintain records demonstrating
compliance with each requirement
applicable to the category of pipeline
according to the following schedule.
(1) An operator must maintain the
segment identification records required
in paragraph (c)(1)(i), (c)(2)(i) or (c)(3)(i)
of this Section for the life of the pipe.
(2) Except for the segment
identification records, an operator must
maintain the records necessary to
demonstrate compliance with each
applicable requirement set forth in
paragraph (c) of this Section according
to the record retention requirements of
the referenced Section or Subpart.
4. Section 195.48 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 195.48
Scope.
This Subpart prescribes requirements
for periodic reporting and for reporting
of accidents and safety-related
conditions. This Subpart applies to all
pipelines subject to this Part. An
operator of a Category 3 rural low-stress
pipeline meeting the criteria in § 195.12
is not required to complete those parts
of the hazardous liquid annual report
form PHMSA F 7000–1.1 associated
with IM or high consequence areas.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 28,
2011.
Cynthia L. Quarterman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–10778 Filed 5–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 395
[Docket ID. FMCSA–2010–0032]
RIN 2126–AB36
Hours of Service Exception for
Railroad Signal Employees
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration (FMCSA) amends
its hours-of-service (HOS) regulations to
adopt regulatory language consistent
with the statutory exemption for certain
railroad signal employees operating
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in
connection with railroad signal work.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This is in accordance with the Rail
Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA
of 2008), which took effect July 16,
2009. This action will ensure that
Federal, State and local motor carrier
enforcement officials are aware of the
statutory exemption applicable to signal
employees and eliminate the potential
for issuance of improper citations.
DATES: This action is effective on May
5, 2011.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents identified
by docket number FMCSA–2010–0032
or RIN 2126–AB36 go to Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov at any time, or
visit the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s Docket Management
Facility at West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Thomas Yager, Chief, Driver and Carrier
Operations Division, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, (202) 366–4325.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background/Overview
This exception to FMCSA’s hours-ofservice (HOS) regulations is mandated
by the RSIA of 2008. This law provides
that ‘‘signal employees’’ who operate
motor vehicles and who are regulated
under 49 U.S.C. 21101, et seq., are not
subject to HOS rules promulgated by
any other Federal authority, including
FMCSA. See 49 U.S.C. 21104(e). Thus,
FMCSA amends its regulations to state
that FMCSA’s HOS regulations do not
apply to a signal employee who is
regulated under 49 U.S.C. 21101–21109.
This amendment will clarify the current
exception applicable to signal
employees for industry and for Federal,
State and local law enforcement and
eliminate the potential for issuance of
improper citations.
FMCSA is also amending the
authority citation for 49 CFR part 395 to
add appropriate statutory references and
eliminate references that are either
erroneous or unnecessary.
II. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This final rule is based on FMCSA’s
authority to implement statutory
directives enacted by several provisions
of the RSIA of 2008, Public Law 110–
432, 122 Stat. 4848, 49 U.S.C. 21101, et
seq. Section 108 of the RSIA of 2008
substantively amends the law applicable
to employees engaged in signal work for
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
railroad operations, effective July 16,
2009. Section 108(a) amends the
definition of ‘‘signal employee’’ to
eliminate the words ‘‘employed by a
railroad carrier.’’ See 49 U.S.C. 21101(4).
As a result, employees of railroad
contractors and subcontractors who are
engaged in installing, repairing, or
maintaining signal systems (the
functions within the definition of signal
employee) will also be covered by the
HOS laws administered by the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA). Section
108(c) modifies the HOS restrictions
applicable to covered employees. See 49
U.S.C. 21104(a)–(d).
Finally, section 108(c) provides that
the HOS, duty hours, and rest periods
of signal employees are governed
exclusively by the HOS laws
administered by FRA. It also provides
that signal employees operating
applicable motor vehicles are not
subject to other HOS, duty hours, or rest
period rules besides the FRA’s
requirements. See 49 U.S.C. 21104(e).
The statutory provision may be
incorporated in regulations adopted by
FMCSA under the authority of the
Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (49 U.S.C.
31502(b)) and the Motor Carrier Safety
Act of 1984 (49 U.S.C. 31136). FMCSA
is authorized to implement these
statutory provisions by delegation from
the Secretary of Transportation in 49
CFR part 1.73.
Congress gave the Agency no
discretion with respect to
implementation of these RSIA of 2008
provisions. While the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) ordinarily requires
the issuance of a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) and opportunity for
public comment, the APA provides an
exception when an ‘‘agency for good
cause finds * * * that notice and public
procedure * * * are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Because
this rule is technical and simply
conforms FMCSA rules with current
statutory provisions, the Agency deems
notice and comment procedures
‘‘unnecessary’’ under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
The promulgation of this final rule is a
nondiscretionary ministerial act
required by a statute. It is also contrary
to the public interest to delay
clarification of this requirement and
FMCSA’s lack of authority to enforce
regulations in light of the FRA’s
authority of this area. Thus, the Agency
finds that this rule may be adopted
without issuing an NPRM and receiving
public comment.
Similarly, the Agency finds the
normal 30-day delayed effective date
following publication of a rule does not
apply. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). The APA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 May 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
exempts from the delayed effective date
requirement ‘‘a substantive rule which
grants or recognizes an exemption or
relieves a restriction.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(1). Pursuant to the RSIA of 2008,
persons covered by the statutory
provision have not been subject to
FMCSA’s HOS requirements since the
enactment of the legislation. This rule
simply makes FMCSA rules consistent
with the statute. Therefore, a 30-day
delay in the effective date would serve
no purpose as the Agency amends its
rule to eliminate confusion among
enforcement officials. The Agency
further finds good cause for this rule to
take effect upon publication under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) because, given that the
rule results in no substantive change in
the law, there is no need for the affected
industry to prepare for its
implementation.
Although the RSIA of 2008 uses the
term ‘‘exemption’’ to cover signal
employees, in order to avoid confusion
with the process that FMCSA uses to
grant time-limited exemptions under 49
CFR part 381, today’s final rule creates
an ‘‘exception.’’ This exception, unlike
an exemption, is permanent in nature,
subject to our legal authority.
III. RSIA of 2008 Provisions
Implemented by the Final Rule
We implement section 108(c) of the
RSIA of 2008 by adding paragraph (r) to
§ 395.1, exempting signal employees
who operate CMVs, but who are covered
by laws applicable to railroad
operations, from FMCSA HOS
regulations.
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review) and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
FMCSA has determined that this
action does not meet the criteria for a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ either as
specified in Executive Order (E.O.)
12866 as supplemented by E.O. 13563
issued by the President on January 18,
2011 (76 FR 3821), or within the
meaning of the Department of
Transportation regulatory policies and
procedures (44 FR 11034, Feb. 26,
1979). Therefore, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). There is no
economic impact to this rule that would
necessitate conducting a full regulatory
evaluation. The rule simply codifies the
elimination of FMCSA jurisdiction over
railroad signal employees, pursuant to
the RSIA of 2008. The RSIA of 2008
section 108(c) delegates the jurisdiction
over the HOS, duty hours, and rest
periods of signal employees exclusively
to the FRA. See 49 U.S.C. 21104(a)–(e).
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
25589
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104–121, 110 Stat. 857),
FMCSA is not required to prepare a
final regulatory flexibility analysis
under 5 U.S.C. 604(a) for this final rule
because the Agency has not issued an
NPRM prior to this action. This final
rule also complies with the President’s
memorandum of January 18, 2011,
entitled Regulatory Flexibility, Small
Business, and Job Creation (76 FR 3827).
As discussed above, promulgation of
this final rule is a nondiscretionary
ministerial act required by a statute and
it creates a regulatory exception.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions.
However, as noted above, this is a nondiscretionary action mandated by
statute, and such actions do not require
preparation of a statement under 2
U.S.C. 1532. In addition, FMCSA is not
required to prepare a statement for this
final rule because the Agency has not
issued an NPRM prior to this action. 2
U.S.C. 1532.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing E.O.
12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this action.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Given FRA’s
authority under the RSIA of 2008 to
regulate the HOS for certain carriers
previously regulated by FMCSA under
49 CFR part 395, FMCSA expects the
population of affected entities subject to
its HOS paperwork burden may be
reduced slightly. However, due to the
total number of entities covered, the
impact to the burden from this change
is expected to be de minimis. Therefore,
FMCSA has not modified its burden
estimate based on this final rule.
FMCSA will consider this impact
during its next planned update to the
associated Information Collection
Request.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Agency analyzed this final rule in
accordance with all statutory and
regulatory policies under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
25590
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
determined under FMCSA
environmental procedures Order 5610.1,
published March 1, 2004 (69 FR 9680),
that the provision of this rule is
categorically excluded (CE) based on
Appendix 2, section 6(b) of the FMCSA
order. This is a technical amendment
needed to conform the regulations to a
statutory mandate. In addition to the
NEPA requirements to examine impacts
on air quality, the Clean Air Act (CAA)
as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) also
requires FMCSA to analyze the potential
impact of its actions on air quality and
to ensure that FMCSA actions conform
to State and local air quality
implementation plans. The additional
contributions to air emissions from this
action are expected to fall within the
CAA de minimis standards and are not
expected to be subject to the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
General Conformity Rule (40 CFR parts
51 and 93).
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This action meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
FMCSA has analyzed this action
under E.O. 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. We determined
that this final rule does not pose an
environmental risk to health or safety
that may disproportionately affect
children.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
This final rule does not effect a taking
of private property or otherwise have
taking implications under E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in E.O. 13132,
Federalism Assessment, and it has been
determined that this rulemaking does
not have a substantial direct effect or
sufficient federalism implications for
States that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the States.
Nothing in this document directly
preempts any State law or regulation.
This final rule does not impose
additional costs or burdens on the
States.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 May 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FMCSA has analyzed this final rule
under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We
have determined that it is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under that
Executive Order because it would not be
likely to have an adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Issued on: May 2, 2011.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–11018 Filed 5–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 395
50 CFR Part 17
Highway safety, Motor carriers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration amends 49 CFR
part 395 as follows:
[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2011–0032;
92220–1113–0000; ABC Code: C6]
PART 395—HOURS OF SERVICE OF
DRIVERS
1. The authority citation for part 395
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 31133, 31136,
31137, and 31502; sec. 113, Pub. L. 103–311,
108 Stat. 1673, 1676; sec. 229, Pub. L. 106–
159 (as transferred by sec. 4115 and amended
by secs. 4130–4132, Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat.
1144, 1726, 1743, 1744); sec. 4133, Pub. L.
109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1744; sec. 108, Pub.
L. 110–432. 122 Stat. 4860–4866; and 49 CFR
1.73.
2. Amend § 395.1 to revise paragraph
(a)(1) and add paragraph (r) to read as
follows:
■
§ 395.1
Scope of the rules in this part.
(a) * * *
(1) The rules in this part apply to all
motor carriers and drivers, except as
provided in paragraphs (b) through (r) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) Railroad signal employees. The
provisions of this part shall not apply to
a signal employee, as defined in § 395.2,
who operates a commercial motor
vehicle, is engaged in installing,
repairing, or maintaining signal systems,
is employed by a railroad carrier or a
contractor or subcontractor to a railroad
carrier, while regulated by the Federal
Railroad Administration.
3. Amend § 395.2 by adding the
definition ‘‘signal employee’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
■
§ 395.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Signal employee, as defined in 49
U.S.C. 21101(4), means an individual
who is engaged in installing, repairing,
or maintaining signal systems.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1018–AX81
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Reissuance of Final Rule
To Identify the Northern Rocky
Mountain Population of Gray Wolf as a
Distinct Population Segment and To
Revise the List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
On April 15, 2011, President
Obama signed the Department of
Defense and Full-Year Appropriations
Act, 2011. A section of that
Appropriations Act directs the Secretary
of the Interior to reissue within 60 days
of enactment the final rule published on
April 2, 2009, that identified the
Northern Rocky Mountain population of
gray wolf (Canis lupus) as a distinct
population segment (DPS) and to revise
the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife by removing most of the gray
wolves in the DPS. This rule complies
with that directive.
DATES: This action is effective May 5,
2011.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. It will also be
available for inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Montana Ecological Services Field
Office, 585 Shepard Way, Helena, MT
59601; telephone (406) 449–5225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on wolves in the northern
Rocky Mountains, see https://
www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/
mammals/wolf/, or contact U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Montana
Ecological Services Field Office (see
ADDRESSES) or telephone (406) 449–
5225. Individuals who are hearingimpaired or speech-impaired may call
the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8337 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25588-25590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11018]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 395
[Docket ID. FMCSA-2010-0032]
RIN 2126-AB36
Hours of Service Exception for Railroad Signal Employees
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) amends
its hours-of-service (HOS) regulations to adopt regulatory language
consistent with the statutory exemption for certain railroad signal
employees operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in connection with
railroad signal work. This is in accordance with the Rail Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA of 2008), which took effect July 16,
2009. This action will ensure that Federal, State and local motor
carrier enforcement officials are aware of the statutory exemption
applicable to signal employees and eliminate the potential for issuance
of improper citations.
DATES: This action is effective on May 5, 2011.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents
identified by docket number FMCSA-2010-0032 or RIN 2126-AB36 go to
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov at any time, or
visit the U.S. Department of Transportation's Docket Management
Facility at West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Thomas Yager, Chief, Driver and
Carrier Operations Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-4325.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background/Overview
This exception to FMCSA's hours-of-service (HOS) regulations is
mandated by the RSIA of 2008. This law provides that ``signal
employees'' who operate motor vehicles and who are regulated under 49
U.S.C. 21101, et seq., are not subject to HOS rules promulgated by any
other Federal authority, including FMCSA. See 49 U.S.C. 21104(e). Thus,
FMCSA amends its regulations to state that FMCSA's HOS regulations do
not apply to a signal employee who is regulated under 49 U.S.C. 21101-
21109. This amendment will clarify the current exception applicable to
signal employees for industry and for Federal, State and local law
enforcement and eliminate the potential for issuance of improper
citations.
FMCSA is also amending the authority citation for 49 CFR part 395
to add appropriate statutory references and eliminate references that
are either erroneous or unnecessary.
II. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
This final rule is based on FMCSA's authority to implement
statutory directives enacted by several provisions of the RSIA of 2008,
Public Law 110-432, 122 Stat. 4848, 49 U.S.C. 21101, et seq. Section
108 of the RSIA of 2008 substantively amends the law applicable to
employees engaged in signal work for
[[Page 25589]]
railroad operations, effective July 16, 2009. Section 108(a) amends the
definition of ``signal employee'' to eliminate the words ``employed by
a railroad carrier.'' See 49 U.S.C. 21101(4). As a result, employees of
railroad contractors and subcontractors who are engaged in installing,
repairing, or maintaining signal systems (the functions within the
definition of signal employee) will also be covered by the HOS laws
administered by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Section
108(c) modifies the HOS restrictions applicable to covered employees.
See 49 U.S.C. 21104(a)-(d).
Finally, section 108(c) provides that the HOS, duty hours, and rest
periods of signal employees are governed exclusively by the HOS laws
administered by FRA. It also provides that signal employees operating
applicable motor vehicles are not subject to other HOS, duty hours, or
rest period rules besides the FRA's requirements. See 49 U.S.C.
21104(e).
The statutory provision may be incorporated in regulations adopted
by FMCSA under the authority of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (49
U.S.C. 31502(b)) and the Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (49 U.S.C.
31136). FMCSA is authorized to implement these statutory provisions by
delegation from the Secretary of Transportation in 49 CFR part 1.73.
Congress gave the Agency no discretion with respect to
implementation of these RSIA of 2008 provisions. While the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) ordinarily requires the issuance of
a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and opportunity for public
comment, the APA provides an exception when an ``agency for good cause
finds * * * that notice and public procedure * * * are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Because this rule is technical and simply conforms FMCSA rules with
current statutory provisions, the Agency deems notice and comment
procedures ``unnecessary'' under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The promulgation
of this final rule is a nondiscretionary ministerial act required by a
statute. It is also contrary to the public interest to delay
clarification of this requirement and FMCSA's lack of authority to
enforce regulations in light of the FRA's authority of this area. Thus,
the Agency finds that this rule may be adopted without issuing an NPRM
and receiving public comment.
Similarly, the Agency finds the normal 30-day delayed effective
date following publication of a rule does not apply. 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
The APA exempts from the delayed effective date requirement ``a
substantive rule which grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a
restriction.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1). Pursuant to the RSIA of 2008,
persons covered by the statutory provision have not been subject to
FMCSA's HOS requirements since the enactment of the legislation. This
rule simply makes FMCSA rules consistent with the statute. Therefore, a
30-day delay in the effective date would serve no purpose as the Agency
amends its rule to eliminate confusion among enforcement officials. The
Agency further finds good cause for this rule to take effect upon
publication under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) because, given that the rule
results in no substantive change in the law, there is no need for the
affected industry to prepare for its implementation.
Although the RSIA of 2008 uses the term ``exemption'' to cover
signal employees, in order to avoid confusion with the process that
FMCSA uses to grant time-limited exemptions under 49 CFR part 381,
today's final rule creates an ``exception.'' This exception, unlike an
exemption, is permanent in nature, subject to our legal authority.
III. RSIA of 2008 Provisions Implemented by the Final Rule
We implement section 108(c) of the RSIA of 2008 by adding paragraph
(r) to Sec. 395.1, exempting signal employees who operate CMVs, but
who are covered by laws applicable to railroad operations, from FMCSA
HOS regulations.
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
FMCSA has determined that this action does not meet the criteria
for a ``significant regulatory action'' either as specified in
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 as supplemented by E.O. 13563 issued by
the President on January 18, 2011 (76 FR 3821), or within the meaning
of the Department of Transportation regulatory policies and procedures
(44 FR 11034, Feb. 26, 1979). Therefore, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). There is no
economic impact to this rule that would necessitate conducting a full
regulatory evaluation. The rule simply codifies the elimination of
FMCSA jurisdiction over railroad signal employees, pursuant to the RSIA
of 2008. The RSIA of 2008 section 108(c) delegates the jurisdiction
over the HOS, duty hours, and rest periods of signal employees
exclusively to the FRA. See 49 U.S.C. 21104(a)-(e).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121,
110 Stat. 857), FMCSA is not required to prepare a final regulatory
flexibility analysis under 5 U.S.C. 604(a) for this final rule because
the Agency has not issued an NPRM prior to this action. This final rule
also complies with the President's memorandum of January 18, 2011,
entitled Regulatory Flexibility, Small Business, and Job Creation (76
FR 3827). As discussed above, promulgation of this final rule is a
nondiscretionary ministerial act required by a statute and it creates a
regulatory exception.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. However, as noted above, this is a non-
discretionary action mandated by statute, and such actions do not
require preparation of a statement under 2 U.S.C. 1532. In addition,
FMCSA is not required to prepare a statement for this final rule
because the Agency has not issued an NPRM prior to this action. 2
U.S.C. 1532.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing E.O. 12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this
action.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). Given FRA's
authority under the RSIA of 2008 to regulate the HOS for certain
carriers previously regulated by FMCSA under 49 CFR part 395, FMCSA
expects the population of affected entities subject to its HOS
paperwork burden may be reduced slightly. However, due to the total
number of entities covered, the impact to the burden from this change
is expected to be de minimis. Therefore, FMCSA has not modified its
burden estimate based on this final rule. FMCSA will consider this
impact during its next planned update to the associated Information
Collection Request.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Agency analyzed this final rule in accordance with all
statutory and regulatory policies under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
[[Page 25590]]
determined under FMCSA environmental procedures Order 5610.1, published
March 1, 2004 (69 FR 9680), that the provision of this rule is
categorically excluded (CE) based on Appendix 2, section 6(b) of the
FMCSA order. This is a technical amendment needed to conform the
regulations to a statutory mandate. In addition to the NEPA
requirements to examine impacts on air quality, the Clean Air Act (CAA)
as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) also requires FMCSA to analyze the
potential impact of its actions on air quality and to ensure that FMCSA
actions conform to State and local air quality implementation plans.
The additional contributions to air emissions from this action are
expected to fall within the CAA de minimis standards and are not
expected to be subject to the Environmental Protection Agency's General
Conformity Rule (40 CFR parts 51 and 93).
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
FMCSA has analyzed this action under E.O. 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. We
determined that this final rule does not pose an environmental risk to
health or safety that may disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
This final rule does not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under E.O. 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in E.O. 13132, Federalism Assessment, and it has
been determined that this rulemaking does not have a substantial direct
effect or sufficient federalism implications for States that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States. Nothing in this
document directly preempts any State law or regulation. This final rule
does not impose additional costs or burdens on the States.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FMCSA has analyzed this final rule under E.O. 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that Executive Order because it would not be
likely to have an adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 395
Highway safety, Motor carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration amends 49 CFR part 395 as follows:
PART 395--HOURS OF SERVICE OF DRIVERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 395 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 504, 31133, 31136, 31137, and 31502; sec.
113, Pub. L. 103-311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1676; sec. 229, Pub. L. 106-
159 (as transferred by sec. 4115 and amended by secs. 4130-4132,
Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1726, 1743, 1744); sec. 4133, Pub.
L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, 1744; sec. 108, Pub. L. 110-432. 122
Stat. 4860-4866; and 49 CFR 1.73.
0
2. Amend Sec. 395.1 to revise paragraph (a)(1) and add paragraph (r)
to read as follows:
Sec. 395.1 Scope of the rules in this part.
(a) * * *
(1) The rules in this part apply to all motor carriers and drivers,
except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (r) of this section.
* * * * *
(r) Railroad signal employees. The provisions of this part shall
not apply to a signal employee, as defined in Sec. 395.2, who operates
a commercial motor vehicle, is engaged in installing, repairing, or
maintaining signal systems, is employed by a railroad carrier or a
contractor or subcontractor to a railroad carrier, while regulated by
the Federal Railroad Administration.
0
3. Amend Sec. 395.2 by adding the definition ``signal employee'' in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 395.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Signal employee, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 21101(4), means an
individual who is engaged in installing, repairing, or maintaining
signal systems.
* * * * *
Issued on: May 2, 2011.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-11018 Filed 5-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P