Solicitation for Public Comment on Potential Alternatives To Resolve Generic Safety Issue 191, Pressurized Water Reactor Sump Performance, 24925-24926 [2011-10712]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2011 / Notices
notice. Comments submitted in writing
or in electronic form will be made
available for public inspection. Because
your comments will not be edited to
remove any identifying or contact
information, the NRC cautions you
against including any information in
your submission that you do not want
to be publicly disclosed. Comments
submitted should reference Docket No.
NRC–2011–0059. You may submit your
comments by any of the following
methods.
Electronic comments: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
Docket No. NRC–2011–0059. Mail
comments to NRC Clearance Officer,
Tremaine Donnell (T–5 F53), U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001. Questions
about the information collection
requirements may be directed to the
NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine
Donnell (T–5 F53), U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, by telephone at 301–
415–6258, or by e-mail to
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day
of April 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tremaine Donnell,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–10648 Filed 5–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2011–0090]
Solicitation for Public Comment on
Potential Alternatives To Resolve
Generic Safety Issue 191, Pressurized
Water Reactor Sump Performance
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Solicitation of public comment.
AGENCY:
The NRC is seeking public
comment on potential alternatives for
risk informing the path forward to
resolve Generic Safety Issue (GSI) 191,
Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Sump
Performance.
DATES: Submit comments by July 5,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2011–0090 in the subject line of
your comments. Comments submitted in
writing or in electronic form will be
posted on the NRC Web site and on the
Federal rulemaking Web site, https://
www.regulations.gov. Because your
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:39 May 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
the NRC cautions you against including
any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party
soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for
submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their
comments to remove any identifying or
contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in
their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed. You may submit
comments by any one of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2011–0090. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301–492–3668; e-mail:
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
• Fax comments to: RADB at 301–
492–3446.
You can access publicly available
documents related to this notice using
the following methods:
• NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR): The public may examine and
have copied, for a fee, publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, O1–F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
created or received at the NRC are
available online in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this page, the public
can gain entry into ADAMS, which
provides text and image files of the
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s
PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site:
Public comments and supporting
materials related to this notice can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching on Docket ID NRC–2011–
0090.
Mr.
Stewart Bailey, Chief of Safety Issue
Resolution Branch, telephone (301)
415–1321, e-mail:
Stewart.Bailey@nrc.gov, or in writing at
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24925
the Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
Background
The NRC identified a potential
susceptibility of PWR emergency core
cooling system (ECCS) recirculation
sump screens and associated flow paths
to debris blockage during design basis
accidents that require recirculation
operation. As a result, all operating
PWR licensees were requested in
Generic Letter (GL) 2004–02, Potential
Impact of Debris Blockage on
Emergency Recirculation during Design
Basis Accidents at Pressurized-Water
Reactors, to perform a mechanistic
evaluation of the recirculation functions
and, as appropriate, to take additional
actions (e.g., plant modifications) to
ensure system functionality.
An overview of licensee and NRC staff
actions to address GSI–191 can be found
in Policy Issue Notation Vote Paper
(SECY–10–0113) which presented to the
Commission the regulatory path forward
options for closure. In a Staff
Requirement Memorandum (SRM) dated
December 23, 2010, the Commission
directed the staff, in part, to explore
alternative paths forward for resolving
GSI–191.
Discussion
While GSI–191 has not yet been fully
resolved, the NRC believes that
measures taken thus far in response to
the sump-clogging issue have
contributed greatly to the safety of US
nuclear power plants. Given the vastly
enlarged advanced strainers installed,
compensatory measures already taken,
and the low probability of challenging
pipe breaks, adequate levels of safety
and defense-in-depth are currently
being maintained. In light of these
factors, the Commission directed that
the staff should take the time needed to
consider all options to a risk-informed,
safety conscious resolution to GSI–191.
The SRM to SECY–10–0113 stated
that the staff should employ innovation
and creativity in fully exploring the
policy and technical implications of all
available alternatives for risk informing
the path forward. These alternatives
were to include, but not be limited to,
how proposed rule for Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, Section
50.46a might impact this issue, and how
the application of a ‘‘no-transition-breaksize’’ approach might work. SECY–10–
0113 is publically available in the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) under
accession No. ML101820296. The SRM
to SECY–10–0113 is also publically
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
24926
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2011 / Notices
available in ADAMS under accession
No. ML103570354. Stakeholders and
interested parties are encouraged to
introduce other options, issues, and
information for the NRC’s consideration.
In an effort to facilitate public
involvement, the staff previously
solicited public input during the 2011
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
(RIC), held in Rockville, MD. During the
RIC, GSI–191 was the subject of one of
the RIC technical sessions. Information
concerning the 2011 RIC is available at
https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
conference-symposia/ric. The GSI–191
technical session agenda and links to all
presentation documents can be found at
https://ric.nrcgateway.gov/docs/
abstracts/SessionAbstract_7.htm.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of April 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Sher Bahadur,
Acting Director, Division of Safety Systems,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–10712 Filed 5–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2011–0095]
Biweekly Notice; Applications and
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses Involving No Significant
Hazards Considerations
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
Pursuant to Section 189a.(2) of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission or NRC)
is publishing this regular biweekly
notice. The Act requires the
Commission publish notice of any
amendments issued, or proposed to be
issued and grants the Commission the
authority to issue and make
immediately effective any amendment
to an operating license upon a
determination by the Commission that
such amendment involves no significant
hazards consideration, notwithstanding
the pendency before the Commission of
a request for a hearing from any person.
This biweekly notice includes all
notices of amendments issued, or
proposed to be issued from April 7,
2011, to April 20, 2011. The last
biweekly notice was published on April
19, 2011 (76 FR 21917 to 21928).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:39 May 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses, Proposed No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
and Opportunity for a Hearing
The Commission has made a
proposed determination that the
following amendment requests involve
no significant hazards consideration.
Under the Commission’s regulations in
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) 50.92, this means
that operation of the facility in
accordance with the proposed
amendment would not (1) Involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of
a new or different kind of accident from
any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. The basis for this
proposed determination for each
amendment request is shown below.
The Commission is seeking public
comments on this proposed
determination. Any comments received
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be
considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license
amendment before expiration of the 60day period provided that its final
determination is that the amendment
involves no significant hazards
consideration. In addition, the
Commission may issue the amendment
prior to the expiration of the 30-day
comment period should circumstances
change during the 30-day comment
period such that failure to act in a
timely way would result, for example in
derating or shutdown of the facility.
Should the Commission take action
prior to the expiration of either the
comment period or the notice period, it
will publish in the Federal Register a
notice of issuance. Should the
Commission make a final No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
any hearing will take place after
issuance. The Commission expects that
the need to take this action will occur
very infrequently.
Written comments may be submitted
by mail to the Chief, Rules,
Announcements and Directives Branch
(RADB), TWB–05–B01M, Division of
Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, and should cite the publication
date and page number of this Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Register notice. Written comments may
also be faxed to the RADB at 301–492–
3446. Documents may be examined,
and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR), located
at One White Flint North, Room O1–
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, any person(s)
whose interest may be affected by this
action may file a request for a hearing
and a petition to intervene with respect
to issuance of the amendment to the
subject facility operating license.
Requests for a hearing and a petition for
leave to intervene shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission’s
‘‘Rules of Practice for Domestic
Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10 CFR part
2. Interested person(s) should consult a
current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is
available at the Commission’s PDR,
located at One White Flint North, Room
O1–F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first
floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Publicly available records will be
accessible from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System’s (ADAMS) Public NRC Library
on the Internet at the NRC Web site,
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/. If a request for a hearing
or petition for leave to intervene is filed
by the above date, the Commission or a
presiding officer designated by the
Commission or by the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will
rule on the request and/or petition; and
the Secretary or the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board will issue a
notice of a hearing or an appropriate
order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a
petition for leave to intervene shall set
forth with particularity the interest of
the petitioner in the proceeding, and
how that interest may be affected by the
results of the proceeding. The petition
should specifically explain the reasons
why intervention should be permitted
with particular reference to the
following general requirements: (1) The
name, address, and telephone number of
the requestor or petitioner; (2) the
nature of the requestor’s/petitioner’s
right under the Act to be made a party
to the proceeding; (3) the nature and
extent of the requestor’s/petitioner’s
property, financial, or other interest in
the proceeding; and (4) the possible
effect of any decision or order which
may be entered in the proceeding on the
requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The
petition must also identify the specific
contentions which the requestor/
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24925-24926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10712]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2011-0090]
Solicitation for Public Comment on Potential Alternatives To
Resolve Generic Safety Issue 191, Pressurized Water Reactor Sump
Performance
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Solicitation of public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NRC is seeking public comment on potential alternatives
for risk informing the path forward to resolve Generic Safety Issue
(GSI) 191, Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Sump Performance.
DATES: Submit comments by July 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID NRC-2011-0090 in the subject line
of your comments. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form
will be posted on the NRC Web site and on the Federal rulemaking Web
site, https://www.regulations.gov. Because your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC
cautions you against including any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their comments to remove any
identifying or contact information, and therefore, they should not
include any information in their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed. You may submit comments by any one of the following
methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC-
2011-0090. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301-492-3668; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
Fax comments to: RADB at 301-492-3446.
You can access publicly available documents related to this notice
using the following methods:
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine
and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC's
PDR, O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC
are available online in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain entry into ADAMS,
which provides text and image files of the NRC's public documents. If
you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's PDR reference staff
at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and
supporting materials related to this notice can be found at https://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID NRC-2011-0090.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Stewart Bailey, Chief of Safety
Issue Resolution Branch, telephone (301) 415-1321, e-mail:
Stewart.Bailey@nrc.gov, or in writing at the Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001.
Background
The NRC identified a potential susceptibility of PWR emergency core
cooling system (ECCS) recirculation sump screens and associated flow
paths to debris blockage during design basis accidents that require
recirculation operation. As a result, all operating PWR licensees were
requested in Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris
Blockage on Emergency Recirculation during Design Basis Accidents at
Pressurized-Water Reactors, to perform a mechanistic evaluation of the
recirculation functions and, as appropriate, to take additional actions
(e.g., plant modifications) to ensure system functionality.
An overview of licensee and NRC staff actions to address GSI-191
can be found in Policy Issue Notation Vote Paper (SECY-10-0113) which
presented to the Commission the regulatory path forward options for
closure. In a Staff Requirement Memorandum (SRM) dated December 23,
2010, the Commission directed the staff, in part, to explore
alternative paths forward for resolving GSI-191.
Discussion
While GSI-191 has not yet been fully resolved, the NRC believes
that measures taken thus far in response to the sump-clogging issue
have contributed greatly to the safety of US nuclear power plants.
Given the vastly enlarged advanced strainers installed, compensatory
measures already taken, and the low probability of challenging pipe
breaks, adequate levels of safety and defense-in-depth are currently
being maintained. In light of these factors, the Commission directed
that the staff should take the time needed to consider all options to a
risk-informed, safety conscious resolution to GSI-191.
The SRM to SECY-10-0113 stated that the staff should employ
innovation and creativity in fully exploring the policy and technical
implications of all available alternatives for risk informing the path
forward. These alternatives were to include, but not be limited to, how
proposed rule for Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section
50.46a might impact this issue, and how the application of a ``no-
transition-break-size'' approach might work. SECY-10-0113 is publically
available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS) under accession No. ML101820296. The SRM to SECY-10-0113 is
also publically
[[Page 24926]]
available in ADAMS under accession No. ML103570354. Stakeholders and
interested parties are encouraged to introduce other options, issues,
and information for the NRC's consideration.
In an effort to facilitate public involvement, the staff previously
solicited public input during the 2011 NRC Regulatory Information
Conference (RIC), held in Rockville, MD. During the RIC, GSI-191 was
the subject of one of the RIC technical sessions. Information
concerning the 2011 RIC is available at https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/conference-symposia/ric. The GSI-191 technical session agenda
and links to all presentation documents can be found at https://ric.nrcgateway.gov/docs/abstracts/SessionAbstract_7.htm.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of April 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Sher Bahadur,
Acting Director, Division of Safety Systems, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-10712 Filed 5-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P