EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Guidance Regarding Identification of Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act, 24479-24480 [2011-10565]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$1,356,320, includes $20 in annualized
capital or O&M costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a
decrease of 1,667 hours in the total
estimated burden currently identified in
the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens. This decrease reflects EPA’s
updating of burden estimates. The
decrease is due to an increase in
computer-generated product transfer
documents.
Dated: April 25, 2011.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–10425 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9300–9]
In the Matter of the Taylor Lumber and
Treating Superfund Site, Sheridan,
Oregon, Amendment to Agreement and
Covenant Not To Sue, Pacific Wood
Preserving of Oregon
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
This Amendment to
Agreement and Covenant Not to Sue
(‘‘Amendment’’) amends the 2002
Agreement and Covenant Not To Sue,
Docket CERCLA–10–2002–0034
(‘‘Original Agreement’’), entered into by
and between the United States on behalf
of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’) and Pacific Wood
Preserving of Oregon (‘‘PWPO’’). In
accordance with the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, 42
U.S.C. 9601 et seq. (‘‘CERCLA’’), notice
is hereby given of the proposed
Agreement between the EPA and PWPO,
subject to the final review and approval
of the EPA and the U.S. Department of
Justice.
The 2002 Original Agreement with
PWPO provided a covenant not to sue
for response costs at the Taylor Lumber
and Treating Site, which PWPO was
acquiring, in exchange for several
obligations related to site operation and
a commitment not to use certain
hazardous products, including
pentachlorophenol, at the Site. This
Amendment removes the restriction on
pentachlorophenol use and extends
PWPO’s commitment to collect and treat
groundwater and maintain the asphalt
cap until January 31, 2022, or for as long
as PWPO owns or operates on the
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Property, whichever is later. This
Amendment includes additional
commitments including submittal of
annual environmental audit reports;
implementation of institutional
controls; payment of EPA future
oversight costs; and, a revised Statement
of Work for future work to be performed
by PWPO.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 16, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is
available for public inspection at the
U.S. EPA Region 10 office, located at
1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. A copy of the proposed
settlement may be obtained from Sharon
Eng, Paralegal, U.S. EPA Region 10,
Mail Stop ORC–158, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, Washington
98101; 206–553–0705. Comments
should reference the Taylor Lumber and
Treating Superfund Site in Sheridan,
Oregon, EPA Docket No. CERCLA–10–
2002–0034 and should be addressed to
Jennifer Byrne, Assistant Regional
Counsel, U.S. EPA Region 10, Mail Stop
ORC–158, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite
900, Seattle, Washington 98101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Byrne, Office of Regional
Counsel, Mail Stop: ORC–158,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA,
98101; telephone number: 206–553–
0050; fax number: 206–553–0163; email address: byrne.jennifer@epa.gov.
Dated: April 25, 2011.
Daniel D. Opalski,
Director, Office of Environmental Cleanup.
[FR Doc. 2011–10567 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Deaprtment of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
[EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0409; FRL–9300–6]
EPA and Army Corps of Engineers
Guidance Regarding Identification of
Waters Protected by the Clean Water
Act
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA); and U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Department of the Army,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (the Corps) are publishing
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24479
for public comment proposed guidance
that describes how the agencies will
identify waters protected by the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act
Amendments of 1972 (Clean Water Act
or CWA or Act) and implement the
Supreme Court’s decisions on this topic
(i.e., Solid Waste Agency of Northern
Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (SWANCC) (531 U.S. 159
(2001)) and Rapanos v. United States
(547 U.S. 715 (2006)) (Rapanos)). The
agencies believe that under this
proposed guidance the number of
waters identified as protected by the
Clean Water Act will increase compared
to current practice and this
improvement will aid in protecting the
Nation’s public health and aquatic
resources.
The proposed guidance is consistent
with the principles established by the
Supreme Court cases and is supported
by the agencies’ scientific
understanding of how waterbodies and
watersheds function.
In addition, the agencies believe that
when the revised guidance is finalized
and goes into effect, it will improve
CWA program predictability and clarity
regarding the scope of ‘‘waters of the
United States’’ protected under the Act
and that this improvement will have
benefits for both the government and
regulated parties. When finalized, this
guidance would supersede previously
issued guidance on this matter. This
guidance will apply to all CWA
programs, including section 303 water
quality standards, section 311 oil spill
prevention and response, section 401
water quality certification, section 402
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permits, and section
404 permits for discharges of dredged or
fill material. The agencies seek public
comment on all aspects of the proposed
guidance, including interpretations and
scientific underpinnings.
In addition to this guidance, the
agencies expect to propose revisions of
existing regulations to further clarify
which waters are subject to CWA
jurisdiction, consistent with the
Supreme Court’s decisions. Public
comment on any such revisions will be
requested at the time they are proposed.
Comments must be received on
or before July 1, 2011.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2011–0409 by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
24480
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Notices
• E-mail: owdocket@epa.gov. Include
EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0409 in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Send the original and three
copies of your comments to: Water
Docket, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, Attention:
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–
0409.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Deliver
your comments to EPA Docket Center,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0409. Such
deliveries are accepted only during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation,
which are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The telephone number for
the Water Docket is 202–566–2426.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–
0409. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov,including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise
protected, through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail directly to EPA
without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA might not be
able to consider your comment. Avoid
the use of special characters and any
form of encryption, and ensure that
electronic files are free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Some
information, however, is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Water Docket, EPA Docket Center,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is 202–566–1744,
and the telephone number for the Water
Docket is 202–566–2426.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Donna Downing, Office of Water
(4502–T), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington DC 20460; telephone
number 202–566–1783; e-mail address:
CWAwaters@epa.gov. Mr. David Olson,
Regulatory Community of Practice
(CECW–CO–R), U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, 441 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20314; telephone
number 202–761–4922; email address:
david.b.olson@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA and
the Corps are seeking public comment
on proposed joint agency guidance
regarding identification of waters
protected by the Clean Water Act. The
agencies intention is that the final joint
guidance will supersede the ‘‘Joint
Memorandum’’ providing clarifying
guidance on SWANCC, dated Jan. 15,
2003 (68 FR 1991, 1995), and ‘‘Clean
Water Act Jurisdiction Following the
U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in
Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v.
United States,’’ dated December 2, 2008,
and available at https://water.epa.gov/
lawsregs/guidance/wetlands/
CWAwaters.cfm. Until that final
guidance is issued, both the 2003 and
2008 CWA jurisdiction guidance remain
in effect.
Congress enacted the Clean Water Act
(CWA) ‘‘to restore and maintain the
chemical, physical, and biological
integrity of the Nation’s waters’’ (33
U.S.C. 1251(a)). One of the mechanisms
adopted by Congress to achieve that
purpose is a prohibition on the
discharge of any pollutants into
‘‘navigable waters’’ except in compliance
with other specified sections of the
CWA (33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and
1362(12)(A)). In most cases, this means
compliance with a permit issued
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
pursuant to CWA section 402 (33 U.S.C.
1342) or section 404 (33 U.S.C. 1344).
The CWA provides that ‘‘[t]he term
‘navigable waters’ means the waters of
the United States, including the
territorial seas’’ (33 U.S.C. 1362(7)). EPA
and the Corps have further defined the
term ‘‘waters of the United States’’ in
regulations (40 CFR 230.3(s) and 33 CFR
328.3(a); substantively similar
regulatory definitions appear at 40 CFR
110.1, 112.2, 116.3, 117.1, 122.2, 232.2,
300.5, part 300 App. E, 302.3 and
401.11).
The U.S. Supreme Court has
addressed the scope of waters of the
United States protected by the CWA in
three cases, two of which are
specifically addressed by the draft
guidance. In SWANCC, the Court
addressed the question of CWA
jurisdiction over isolated ponds, and
concluded that CWA jurisdiction could
not be based solely on the presence of
migratory birds. In Rapanos, the Court
addressed CWA protections for
wetlands adjacent to tributaries, and
issued five opinions with no single
opinion commanding a majority of the
Court. Neither SWANCC nor the
opinions in Rapanos invalidated any of
the regulatory provisions defining
‘‘waters of the United States.’’ The Court
also addressed the question of CWA
jurisdiction in an earlier case, Riverside
Bayview Homes. While not specifically
addressed in the current guidance, this
case informed the Court’s decisions in
the latter two cases.
The agencies believe it is advisable to
replace existing guidance documents
interpreting SWANCC and Rapanos in
order to implement the CWA in a
manner that is consistent with those
opinions, reflects the best available
science, and recognizes recent field
implementation experience. By
reflecting such developments, the
proposed guidance made available
today for public comment is expected,
once it is finalized after considering all
comments received, to provide clearer
direction to field staff in implementing
the Court decisions and reduce
uncertainty in the regulated community.
EPA and Army Corps of Engineers
Guidance Regarding Identification of
Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act
Dated: April 25, 2011.
Nancy K. Stoner,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Water
Environmental Protection Agency.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
Jo Ellen Darcy,
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works),
Department of the Army.
[FR Doc. 2011–10565 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24479-24480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10565]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Deaprtment of the Army, Corps of Engineers
[EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0409; FRL-9300-6]
EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Guidance Regarding Identification
of Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Department of the Army, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (the Corps) are publishing for public comment
proposed guidance that describes how the agencies will identify waters
protected by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972
(Clean Water Act or CWA or Act) and implement the Supreme Court's
decisions on this topic (i.e., Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook
County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC) (531 U.S. 159 (2001))
and Rapanos v. United States (547 U.S. 715 (2006)) (Rapanos)). The
agencies believe that under this proposed guidance the number of waters
identified as protected by the Clean Water Act will increase compared
to current practice and this improvement will aid in protecting the
Nation's public health and aquatic resources.
The proposed guidance is consistent with the principles established
by the Supreme Court cases and is supported by the agencies' scientific
understanding of how waterbodies and watersheds function.
In addition, the agencies believe that when the revised guidance is
finalized and goes into effect, it will improve CWA program
predictability and clarity regarding the scope of ``waters of the
United States'' protected under the Act and that this improvement will
have benefits for both the government and regulated parties. When
finalized, this guidance would supersede previously issued guidance on
this matter. This guidance will apply to all CWA programs, including
section 303 water quality standards, section 311 oil spill prevention
and response, section 401 water quality certification, section 402
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits, and section
404 permits for discharges of dredged or fill material. The agencies
seek public comment on all aspects of the proposed guidance, including
interpretations and scientific underpinnings.
In addition to this guidance, the agencies expect to propose
revisions of existing regulations to further clarify which waters are
subject to CWA jurisdiction, consistent with the Supreme Court's
decisions. Public comment on any such revisions will be requested at
the time they are proposed.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2011-0409 by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
[[Page 24480]]
E-mail: owdocket@epa.gov. Include EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0409 in
the subject line of the message.
Mail: Send the original and three copies of your comments
to: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention: Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0409.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Deliver your comments to EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0409. Such deliveries
are accepted only during the Docket's normal hours of operation, which
are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The telephone number for the Water Docket is 202-566-2426.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-
0409. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov,including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI, or otherwise protected, through https://www.regulations.gov or
e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail directly to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA might not be able to
consider your comment. Avoid the use of special characters and any form
of encryption, and ensure that electronic files are free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Some information, however, is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available
docket materials are available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Water Docket, EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is 202-566-1744, and the telephone number for the
Water Docket is 202-566-2426.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna Downing, Office of Water
(4502-T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington DC 20460; telephone number 202-566-1783; e-mail address:
CWAwaters@epa.gov. Mr. David Olson, Regulatory Community of Practice
(CECW-CO-R), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20314; telephone number 202-761-4922; email address:
david.b.olson@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA and the Corps are seeking public comment
on proposed joint agency guidance regarding identification of waters
protected by the Clean Water Act. The agencies intention is that the
final joint guidance will supersede the ``Joint Memorandum'' providing
clarifying guidance on SWANCC, dated Jan. 15, 2003 (68 FR 1991, 1995),
and ``Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court's
Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States,''
dated December 2, 2008, and available at https://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/wetlands/CWAwaters.cfm. Until that final guidance is issued,
both the 2003 and 2008 CWA jurisdiction guidance remain in effect.
Congress enacted the Clean Water Act (CWA) ``to restore and
maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the
Nation's waters'' (33 U.S.C. 1251(a)). One of the mechanisms adopted by
Congress to achieve that purpose is a prohibition on the discharge of
any pollutants into ``navigable waters'' except in compliance with
other specified sections of the CWA (33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and
1362(12)(A)). In most cases, this means compliance with a permit issued
pursuant to CWA section 402 (33 U.S.C. 1342) or section 404 (33 U.S.C.
1344). The CWA provides that ``[t]he term `navigable waters' means the
waters of the United States, including the territorial seas'' (33
U.S.C. 1362(7)). EPA and the Corps have further defined the term
``waters of the United States'' in regulations (40 CFR 230.3(s) and 33
CFR 328.3(a); substantively similar regulatory definitions appear at 40
CFR 110.1, 112.2, 116.3, 117.1, 122.2, 232.2, 300.5, part 300 App. E,
302.3 and 401.11).
The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed the scope of waters of the
United States protected by the CWA in three cases, two of which are
specifically addressed by the draft guidance. In SWANCC, the Court
addressed the question of CWA jurisdiction over isolated ponds, and
concluded that CWA jurisdiction could not be based solely on the
presence of migratory birds. In Rapanos, the Court addressed CWA
protections for wetlands adjacent to tributaries, and issued five
opinions with no single opinion commanding a majority of the Court.
Neither SWANCC nor the opinions in Rapanos invalidated any of the
regulatory provisions defining ``waters of the United States.'' The
Court also addressed the question of CWA jurisdiction in an earlier
case, Riverside Bayview Homes. While not specifically addressed in the
current guidance, this case informed the Court's decisions in the
latter two cases.
The agencies believe it is advisable to replace existing guidance
documents interpreting SWANCC and Rapanos in order to implement the CWA
in a manner that is consistent with those opinions, reflects the best
available science, and recognizes recent field implementation
experience. By reflecting such developments, the proposed guidance made
available today for public comment is expected, once it is finalized
after considering all comments received, to provide clearer direction
to field staff in implementing the Court decisions and reduce
uncertainty in the regulated community.
EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Guidance Regarding Identification
of Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act
Dated: April 25, 2011.
Nancy K. Stoner,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Water Environmental Protection
Agency.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
Jo Ellen Darcy,
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), Department of the Army.
[FR Doc. 2011-10565 Filed 4-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P