Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge, Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico; Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment, 24511-24512 [2011-10547]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Notices
Dated: April 26, 2011.
Robert C. Ryan,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Housing—
Acting Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2011–10445 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2010–N277; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge,
Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico; Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of our draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Cabo
Rojo National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) for
public review and comment. In the Draft
CCP/EA, we describe the alternative we
propose to use to manage this refuge for
the 15 years following approval of the
final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the Draft CCP/EA by contacting Ms.
Laura Housh, Regional Planner,
Okefenokee NWR, 2700 Suwannee
Canal Road, Folkston, GA 31537.
Alternatively, you may download the
document from our Internet Site at
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning under
‘‘Draft Documents.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Laura Housh, at 912/496–6273
(telephone) or laura_housh@fws.gov
´
(e-mail); or Mr. Oscar Dıaz, at 787/851–
7258, extension 312 (telephone), or
oscar_diaz@fws.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
SUMMARY:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Cabo Rojo NWR. We started
the process through a notice of intent in
the Federal Register on March 12, 2007
(72 FR 11047). For more about the
refuge, its purposes, and our CCP
process, please see that notice.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act), as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Administration Act.
The refuge lies along a coastal plain
and has a few gently rolling hills
overlooking the southwestern tip of
Puerto Rico. The establishment of the
refuge was justified for the potential
value that the habitat held for migratory
birds and also for its value in providing
habitat for resident birds, particularly
doves and pigeons. The area is one of
the few blocks of land in southwestern
´
Puerto Rico west of the Guanica
Commonwealth Forest remaining in
public ownership. The native vegetation
is classified as subtropical dry forest
under the Holdridge classification of
world life zones. At least 245 plant
species and 145 bird species have been
identified on the refuge.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our
Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for
managing the refuge and chose
Alternative C as the proposed
alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We
summarize each alternative below.
Alternative A (Current Management, No
Action)
Under this alternative, we would
continue to restore and maintain
existing sub-tropical dryland forests,
salt lagoons, and grassland habitats.
Active habitat wetland management
would be implemented by continuing
water level manipulations for
management of the saltwater lagoons
through a special use permit with a
commercial salt production company.
We would continue to accommodate
environmental education and
interpretation programs and wildlife
observation and photography. The
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24511
˜
friends group, Caborrojenos, would
continue to partner with us in providing
limited visitor services. The law
enforcement program for the protection
of wildlife and visitors would continue
at current levels.
Alternative B (Resource Emphasis)
Under this alternative, we would
provide greater management of habitats
and associated plant communities for
the benefit of wildlife.
Activities that would be expanded or
introduced under this alternative would
include: Managing endangered plant
populations and reducing the
occurrence of exotic species; exploring
opportunities and alternatives to assume
direct control of managing water levels
in the saltwater lagoons; establishing
and managing a larger nursery to
increase reforestation of native tree
species in upland areas; restoring
additional freshwater and saltwater
ponds to increase avian habitat;
expanding the volunteer base to
increase habitat restoration activities;
and proactively expanding research
collaboration with universities.
Additional staff would be required to
implement this alternative. Such staff
would likely include a biologist, a
volunteer coordinator, and additional
support staff.
Alternative C (Habitat and Public Use
Emphasis, Proposed)
Under this alternative, our emphasis
would be on improving refuge resources
for habitat and wildlife. We would
provide greater support for the visitor
service program, including emphasis on
the following: Developing a curriculumbased environmental education
program; expanding the role of the
friends group to include providing
staffing and interpreting services at the
new visitor services center; reviewing
and updating our brochures and
website, including offering a Spanish
version of the website; updating current
kiosks and building new kiosks along
the trail system; expanding the
volunteer program to also provide
assistance with public use activities;
seeking and developing new
partnerships, particularly with regard to
trail maintenance; and adding
additional signage to clarify refuge uses.
Additional staff required to
implement Alternative C would include
an additional visitor services/
environmental education specialist and
a volunteer coordinator. Additional
infrastructure would also be required to
expand activities under this alternative,
including developing volunteer housing
and acquiring one or more additional
vehicles.
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
24512
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Notices
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we
will analyze the comments and address
them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the
authority of the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, Public Law 105–57.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2010–N276; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife
Refuge, Lajas, Puerto Rico; Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of our draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Laguna
Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR) for public review and comment.
In the Draft CCP/EA, we describe the
alternative we propose to use to manage
this refuge for the 15 years following
approval of the final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the Draft CCP/EA by contacting Ms.
Laura Housh, Regional Planner,
Okefenokee NWR, 2700 Suwannee
Canal Road, Folkston, GA 31537.
Alternatively, you may download the
document from our Internet Site at
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:48 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Ms.
Laura Housh, at 912/496–6273
(telephone) or laura_housh@fws.gov
(e-mail); or Mr. Oscar Diaz, at 787/851–
7258, extension 312 (telephone), or
oscar_diaz@fws.gov (e-mail).
Under this alternative, our
management actions would continue to
be directed towards achieving the
refuge’s primary purposes. These
purposes include restoring and
enhancing native wildlife and plants,
particularly the endangered yellowshouldered blackbird; increasing the
level of environmental awareness
among residents and visitors; and
protecting one of the most important
shorebird habitats in the Caribbean. We
would continue to restore and maintain
existing subtropical dryland forest, the
Cartagena Lagoon, and grassland
habitats. Management programs would
continue to be developed and
implemented with limited baseline
biological information. Active habitat
wetland management would be
implemented by continuing water-level
management of the lagoon and
conducting opportunistic removal of
cattails to try and create more open
water. Current visitor facilities, which
are somewhat limited, would be
maintained, but no additional facilities
would be added, except for perhaps a
new information kiosk. Law
enforcement of refuge regulations and
for protection of wildlife and visitors
would continue at current levels, which
is done through sharing the resource of
a single law enforcement officer who is
based at Cabo Rojo National Wildlife
Refuge.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Laguna Cartagena NWR. We
started the process through a notice of
intent in the Federal Register on May
16, 2007 (72 FR 27588). For more about
the refuge, its purposes, and our CCP
process, please see that notice.
The CCP Process
[FR Doc. 2011–10547 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
Alternative A (Current Management, No
Action)
Background
Dated: January 5, 2011.
Mark J. Musaus,
Acting Regional Director.
AGENCY:
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning under
‘‘Draft Documents.’’
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act), as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Administration Act.
The establishment of the refuge was
justified to rehabilitate the lagoon for
resident and migratory water birds and
to provide increased wildlife-dependent
public use. To date, 164 species of birds
have been recorded in the area,
including 25 first-records for Puerto
Rico.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our
Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for
managing the refuge and chose
Alternative B as the proposed
alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We
summarize each alternative below.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alternative B (Wildlife Diversity and
Habitat Restoration, Proposed)
Under this alternative, our emphasis
would be on improving refuge resources
for wildlife. We would provide greater
enhancement and management of all
habitats and associated plant
communities for the greater benefit of
wildlife. We would also work to
reintroduce native fish to the lagoon and
actively help to support birds that are
threatened, endangered, or of
management interest, including West
Indian whistling ducks and kestrels.
Specific activities that would be
expanded or introduced under this
alternative would include: Actively
managing endangered plant
populations, increasing native
vegetative planting in the uplands,
reducing the occurrence of exotic
species, and better managing the
lagoon’s water quality and open-water
restoration effort. In addition, we would
expand the visitor services program,
including facilities.
Additional staff would be required to
implement this alternative. Such staff
would likely include a biologist, a
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24511-24512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10547]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2010-N277; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
Cabo Rojo National Wildlife Refuge, Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico; Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our draft comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Cabo Rojo National Wildlife
Refuge (NWR) for public review and comment. In the Draft CCP/EA, we
describe the alternative we propose to use to manage this refuge for
the 15 years following approval of the final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by June 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the Draft CCP/EA by contacting Ms.
Laura Housh, Regional Planner, Okefenokee NWR, 2700 Suwannee Canal
Road, Folkston, GA 31537. Alternatively, you may download the document
from our Internet Site at https://southeast.fws.gov/planning under
``Draft Documents.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laura Housh, at 912/496-6273
(telephone) or laura_housh@fws.gov (e-mail); or Mr. Oscar D[iacute]az,
at 787/851-7258, extension 312 (telephone), or oscar_diaz@fws.gov (e-
mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Cabo Rojo NWR. We
started the process through a notice of intent in the Federal Register
on March 12, 2007 (72 FR 11047). For more about the refuge, its
purposes, and our CCP process, please see that notice.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop
a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and
wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration
Act.
The refuge lies along a coastal plain and has a few gently rolling
hills overlooking the southwestern tip of Puerto Rico. The
establishment of the refuge was justified for the potential value that
the habitat held for migratory birds and also for its value in
providing habitat for resident birds, particularly doves and pigeons.
The area is one of the few blocks of land in southwestern Puerto Rico
west of the Gu[aacute]nica Commonwealth Forest remaining in public
ownership. The native vegetation is classified as subtropical dry
forest under the Holdridge classification of world life zones. At least
245 plant species and 145 bird species have been identified on the
refuge.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for managing the refuge and chose
Alternative C as the proposed alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We summarize each alternative
below.
Alternative A (Current Management, No Action)
Under this alternative, we would continue to restore and maintain
existing sub-tropical dryland forests, salt lagoons, and grassland
habitats. Active habitat wetland management would be implemented by
continuing water level manipulations for management of the saltwater
lagoons through a special use permit with a commercial salt production
company. We would continue to accommodate environmental education and
interpretation programs and wildlife observation and photography. The
friends group, Caborroje[ntilde]os, would continue to partner with us
in providing limited visitor services. The law enforcement program for
the protection of wildlife and visitors would continue at current
levels.
Alternative B (Resource Emphasis)
Under this alternative, we would provide greater management of
habitats and associated plant communities for the benefit of wildlife.
Activities that would be expanded or introduced under this
alternative would include: Managing endangered plant populations and
reducing the occurrence of exotic species; exploring opportunities and
alternatives to assume direct control of managing water levels in the
saltwater lagoons; establishing and managing a larger nursery to
increase reforestation of native tree species in upland areas;
restoring additional freshwater and saltwater ponds to increase avian
habitat; expanding the volunteer base to increase habitat restoration
activities; and proactively expanding research collaboration with
universities.
Additional staff would be required to implement this alternative.
Such staff would likely include a biologist, a volunteer coordinator,
and additional support staff.
Alternative C (Habitat and Public Use Emphasis, Proposed)
Under this alternative, our emphasis would be on improving refuge
resources for habitat and wildlife. We would provide greater support
for the visitor service program, including emphasis on the following:
Developing a curriculum-based environmental education program;
expanding the role of the friends group to include providing staffing
and interpreting services at the new visitor services center; reviewing
and updating our brochures and website, including offering a Spanish
version of the website; updating current kiosks and building new kiosks
along the trail system; expanding the volunteer program to also provide
assistance with public use activities; seeking and developing new
partnerships, particularly with regard to trail maintenance; and adding
additional signage to clarify refuge uses.
Additional staff required to implement Alternative C would include
an additional visitor services/environmental education specialist and a
volunteer coordinator. Additional infrastructure would also be required
to expand activities under this alternative, including developing
volunteer housing and acquiring one or more additional vehicles.
[[Page 24512]]
Next Step
After the comment period ends, we will analyze the comments and
address them.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
This notice is published under the authority of the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law 105-57.
Dated: January 5, 2011.
Mark J. Musaus,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-10547 Filed 4-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P