Paperwork Reduction Act; Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 24537-24538 [2011-10481]

Download as PDF 24537 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Notices I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of April 11, 2011 through April 15, 2011. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: April 20, 2011. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2011–10526 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 12, 2011. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 12, 2011. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of April 2011. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX [11 TAA petitions instituted between 4/11/11 and 4/15/11] Subject firm (petitioners) Location Wilton Brands Inc. (Workers) ............................................... R Squared Circuits (Workers) .............................................. JPMorgan Chase (State/One-Stop) ..................................... HIRel Systems LLC (State/One-Stop) .................................. Sullivan Carson (Company) ................................................. United Carving Inc. (Company) ............................................ Delphi (Workers) ................................................................... Muller Martini Manufacturing (Workers) ............................... Hartford Financial (State/One-Stop) ..................................... Coupled Products LLC (Company) ...................................... Callaway Golf Ball Operations, Inc. (Company) .................. Cloverdale, CA ...................... Folsom, CA ........................... Fort Worth, TX ...................... Duluth, MN ............................ York, SC ................................ Hickory, NC ........................... El Paso, TX ........................... Newport News, VA ................ Simsbury, CT ........................ Columbia City, IN .................. Chicopee, MA ....................... TA–W 80100 80101 80102 80103 80104 80105 80106 80107 80108 80109 80110 ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ [FR Doc. 2011–10528 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY Paperwork Reduction Act; Proposed Collection; Comment Request Office of National Drug Control Policy. ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments. New Information Collection Request: Drug Free Communities Support Program National Evaluation. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6 AGENCY: The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) intends to submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget for review and SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Apr 29, 2011 Jkt 223001 approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act. DATES: ONDCP encourages and will accept public comments 60 days after the date of this publication. ADDRESSES: Address all comments in writing within 60 days to Shannon D. Weatherly. Facsimile and email are the most reliable means of communication. Ms. Weatherly’s facsimile number is (202) 395–6841, and her e-mail address is sweatherly@ondcp.eop.gov. Mailing address is: Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Drug-Free Communities (DFC) Support Program, 750 17th Street, Washington, DC 20503. For further information, contact Ms. Weatherly at (202) 395–6774. Abstract: ONDCP directs the Drug Free Communities (DFC) Program in PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Date of institution 04/11/11 04/11/11 04/11/11 04/12/11 04/13/11 04/13/11 04/14/11 04/14/11 04/15/11 04/15/11 04/15/11 Date of petition 04/11/11 04/11/11 04/11/11 04/11/11 04/12/11 04/13/11 04/05/11 04/13/11 04/05/11 04/14/11 04/14/11 partnership with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. The DFC Program has two primary goals: To reduce youth substance abuse, and to support community anti-drug coalitions by establishing, strengthening, and fostering collaboration among public and private agencies. Congress mandated an evaluation of the DFC Program to determine effectiveness in meeting objectives. In 2009, the DFC Program awarded a contract to build upon the results of an earlier evaluation and make use of an existing web-based performance system, called the Coalition Online Management and Evaluation Tool (COMET) and the Coalition Classification Tool (CCT), to gather information from DFC grantees. E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6 24538 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Notices COMET and CCT are being revised to reduce the burden of information collection on grantees, increase the quality of the data, and facilitate the monitoring and tracking of grantee progress. In addition to the information collected from the COMET and CCT system, the new evaluation will include a case study component to document coalition practices. This element of the evaluation will involve interviews with coalition leaders and surveys of coalition partners from a number of agencies. Each year, nine DFC grantees will be evaluated and the information from the case studies will be shared other grantees. Type of Information Collection: Webbased data collection, surveys and interviews of DFC and Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking (STOP) Act grantees. Title: Drug Free Communities Support Program National Evaluation. Frequency: Semi-annually by DFC and Stop Act Program Directors via COMET, and annually for DFC Program Directors and selected coalition members via the CCT. Interviews and electronic surveys of Program Directors and electronic surveys of selected coalition members will be accomplished one time. Affected Public: DFC and STOP Act grantees. Estimated Burden: ONDCP expects that the time required to complete each semi-annual report via COMET will be approximately five hours, and each CCT report will take approximately one hour to complete. Face to face interviews will take 1.5–2 hours and surveys will take approximately .25 hours each to complete. The estimated total amount of time required by all respondents over one year, including Program Directors and grantees to complete COMET, CCT, surveys, and interviews, is 9,680 hours. Goals: ONDCP intends to use the data of the DFC National Evaluation to assess the DFC Program’s effectiveness in preventing and reducing youth substance use. Two primary objectives of the evaluation are to: (1) Support an effective grant monitoring mechanism that provides the Federal government with the expertise, system, functions, and products to collect, analyze, and report data collectively, and (2) regularly monitor and measure data in order to demonstrate the progress of the DFC program and its grantees. Comment Request: ONDCP especially invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed data are proper for the functions of the agency; (2) whether the information will have practical utility; (3) the accuracy of ONDCP’s estimate of VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Apr 29, 2011 Jkt 223001 the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions; (4) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and, (5) ways to ease the burden on proposed respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments will be accepted for sixty days. Dated: April 26, 2011. Daniel R. Petersen, Deputy General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2011–10481 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3180–02–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50–413 and 50–414; NRC– 2011–0100; Docket Nos. 50–369 and 50–370; Docket Nos. 50–269, 50–270, and 50–287] Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has granted the request by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (the licensee), to withdraw its April 26, 2010, application for proposed amendments to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses NPF–35 and NPF–52 for the Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, located in York County, South Carolina; Renewed Facility Operating Licenses NPF–9 and NPF–17, for the McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; and Renewed Facility Operating Licenses DPR–38, DPR–47, and DPR–55 for the Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 located in Oconee County, South Carolina. The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical Specifications (TSs) and Licenses by making organizational changes. The Commission has previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on September 7, 2010 (75 FR 54392). However, the licensee has chosen not to pursue the proposed change. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated April 26, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML101250042), and the PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 NRC staff’s letters dated April 18, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML11094A029), and April 26, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML11109A079). Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of April 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. John Stang, Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II–1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011–10558 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2011–0097] Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, Availability Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Issuance and Availability of Draft Regulatory Guide, DG–1264, ‘‘Thermal Overload Protection for Electric Motors On Motor-Operated Valves.’’ AGENCY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darrell Murdock, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–251– 7629 or e-mail Darrell.Murdock@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment a draft guide in the agency’s ‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series was developed to describe and make available to the public such information as methods that are acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the NRC’s regulations, techniques that the staff uses in evaluating specific problems or E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24537-24538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10481]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY


Paperwork Reduction Act; Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy.

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments. New Information 
Collection Request: Drug Free Communities Support Program National 
Evaluation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) intends to 
submit the following information collection request to the Office of 
Management and Budget for review and approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act.

DATES: ONDCP encourages and will accept public comments 60 days after 
the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments in writing within 60 days to Shannon D. 
Weatherly. Facsimile and email are the most reliable means of 
communication. Ms. Weatherly's facsimile number is (202) 395-6841, and 
her e-mail address is sweatherly@ondcp.eop.gov. Mailing address is: 
Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control 
Policy, Drug-Free Communities (DFC) Support Program, 750 17th Street, 
Washington, DC 20503. For further information, contact Ms. Weatherly at 
(202) 395-6774.
    Abstract: ONDCP directs the Drug Free Communities (DFC) Program in 
partnership with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration's Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. The DFC Program 
has two primary goals: To reduce youth substance abuse, and to support 
community anti-drug coalitions by establishing, strengthening, and 
fostering collaboration among public and private agencies.
    Congress mandated an evaluation of the DFC Program to determine 
effectiveness in meeting objectives. In 2009, the DFC Program awarded a 
contract to build upon the results of an earlier evaluation and make 
use of an existing web-based performance system, called the Coalition 
Online Management and Evaluation Tool (COMET) and the Coalition 
Classification Tool (CCT), to gather information from DFC grantees.

[[Page 24538]]

COMET and CCT are being revised to reduce the burden of information 
collection on grantees, increase the quality of the data, and 
facilitate the monitoring and tracking of grantee progress.
    In addition to the information collected from the COMET and CCT 
system, the new evaluation will include a case study component to 
document coalition practices. This element of the evaluation will 
involve interviews with coalition leaders and surveys of coalition 
partners from a number of agencies. Each year, nine DFC grantees will 
be evaluated and the information from the case studies will be shared 
other grantees.
    Type of Information Collection: Web-based data collection, surveys 
and interviews of DFC and Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking 
(STOP) Act grantees.
    Title: Drug Free Communities Support Program National Evaluation.
    Frequency: Semi-annually by DFC and Stop Act Program Directors via 
COMET, and annually for DFC Program Directors and selected coalition 
members via the CCT. Interviews and electronic surveys of Program 
Directors and electronic surveys of selected coalition members will be 
accomplished one time.
    Affected Public: DFC and STOP Act grantees.
    Estimated Burden: ONDCP expects that the time required to complete 
each semi-annual report via COMET will be approximately five hours, and 
each CCT report will take approximately one hour to complete. Face to 
face interviews will take 1.5-2 hours and surveys will take 
approximately .25 hours each to complete. The estimated total amount of 
time required by all respondents over one year, including Program 
Directors and grantees to complete COMET, CCT, surveys, and interviews, 
is 9,680 hours.
    Goals: ONDCP intends to use the data of the DFC National Evaluation 
to assess the DFC Program's effectiveness in preventing and reducing 
youth substance use. Two primary objectives of the evaluation are to: 
(1) Support an effective grant monitoring mechanism that provides the 
Federal government with the expertise, system, functions, and products 
to collect, analyze, and report data collectively, and (2) regularly 
monitor and measure data in order to demonstrate the progress of the 
DFC program and its grantees.
    Comment Request: ONDCP especially invites comments on: (1) Whether 
the proposed data are proper for the functions of the agency; (2) 
whether the information will have practical utility; (3) the accuracy 
of ONDCP's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions; 
(4) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and, (5) ways to ease the burden on 
proposed respondents, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments will be 
accepted for sixty days.

    Dated: April 26, 2011.
Daniel R. Petersen,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-10481 Filed 4-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3180-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.